KISI-KISI TES URAIAN NON OBJEKTIF

UJIAN TENGAH SEMESTER

DEPARTEMEN/PROGRAM STUDI : Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris

MATA KULIAH / SKS/KODE : Academic Writing /2 Credit hours/ENG05209
CAPAIAN PEMBELAJARAN : After learning this subject, students is expected to:
1. have knowledge of writing concepts and theories;
2. develop critical reasoning and problem solving in
the process of writing;
3. self-develop access in conventional and digital
writing as academic writer;
4. demonstrate skills in writing research journal
article.

WAKTU UJIAN : 1 PEKAN

JENIS SOAL TEST : NON OBJEKTIF
SEMESTER : IV (EMPAT)

BENTUK SOAL NON OBJEKTIF

ASPEK BERPIKIR TERTINGGI JML %
CONTENT KNOWLEDGE SOAL
NO.
C2 C3 C4 C5 C6
1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2
1 Understanding critical issues for topic of researchable √
10%
journal article writing discussed.
2 Understanding the designs of academic article in √
academic writing; 15%

3 Applying the strategies in writing abstract-keyword √

20%
and writing introduction;
4 Writing creative, clear, logical, and critical ideas in
text writing, including conclusion; √ 25%

5 Developing critical reasoning in problem solving √

discussion, supported by citations, proper method,
30%
data analysis, results and findings, and reputable
recent research sources and references.
JUMLAH SOAL
100%
PROSENTASE

Mengetahui, Indramayu, 22 April 2021

Kepala Departemen Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris, Dosen Pengampu Mata Kuliah,

Ida Yulianawati, M.Pd. Nasori Efendi, S.S., M.Pd.

 PARAMETER PENILAIAN UTS
MATA KULIAH: ACADEMIC WRITING

NO PARAMETER SCORE NILAI

1 Understanding critical issues for topic of researchable journal article writing 10%
discussed:
1. Title of article is clear written and researchable that indicates critical issue; 10
2. Title of article is not clear written and not researchable issue; 5
3. No title of article is written. 0
2 Understanding the designs of academic article in academic writing: 15%
1. The article has proper and complete designs of academic article in 15
academic writing;
2. The article has incomplete designs of academic article in academic 10
writing;
3. The article has improper designs of academic article in academic writing. 5
3 Applying the strategies in writing abstract-keyword and writing introduction: 20%
1. The strategies in writing abstract and introduction are clearly indicated; 20
2. The strategies in writing abstract and introduction are still in bias written; 10
3. The strategies in writing abstract and introduction are not clear indicated. 5
4 Writing creative, clear, logical, and critical ideas in text writing, including clear and 25%
concise conclusion:
1. The ideas are best written creatively, logically, and critically in text 25
writing, including clear and concise conclusion;
2. The ideas are good written creatively, logically, and critically in text 15
writing, including clear and concise conclusion;
3. The ideas are enough written creatively, logically, and critical in text 10
writing. including conclusion;
4. The ideas are less written creatively, logically, and critically in text 5
writing, and bias conclusion.
5 Developing critical reasoning in problem solving discussion supported by citations, 30%
proper method of research, data analysis, results and findings, supported by
reputable recent research sources and references:
1. Developing clear critical reasoning in problem solving discussion, very 30
good supported completely by citations, proper method, data analysis,
results and findings, and reputable recent research sources and references;
2. Developing quite clear critical reasoning in problem solving discussion, 20
good supported completely by citations, proper method, data analysis,
results and findings, reputable recent research sources and references;
3. Developing less critical reasoning in problem solving discussion, but quite 10
supported by citations, proper method, data analysis, results and findings,
and reputable recent research sources and references;
4. Developing less critical reasoning in problem solving discussion, less 5
supported by citations, method, data analysis, results and findings, and
reputable recent research sources and references.
TOTAL NILAI 100% 0-100

Mengetahui, Indramayu, 22 April 2021

Kepala Departemen Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris, Dosen Pengampu Mata Kuliah,

Ida Yulianawati, M.Pd. Nasori Efendi, SS. MPd.

 RANGE PENILAIAN

RANGE BENTUK NILAI MUTU KETERANGAN

80,00-100 A 4,00 DENGAN PUJIAN
75,00-79,99 AB 3,50 DENGAN PUJIAN
70,00-74,99 B 3,00 SANGAT
MEMUASKAN
(2,75-3,49)
65,00-69,99 BC 2,50 MEMUASKAN
(2,00-2,74)
60,00-64,99 C 2,00 MEMUASKAN
(2,00-2,74)
55,00-59,99 CD 1,50
50,00-54,99 D 1,00
0,00-49,99 E 0
T TIDAK LENGKAP
K KOSONG