Professional Documents
Culture Documents
MAJOR ASSIGNMENT
MALAIKA GHUFRAN
10470 SECTION A
SUBMITTED TO
SIR SHARJEEL
[SHORTENED TITLE UP TO 50 CHARACTERS] 2
MAJOR ASSIGNMENT
SUMMARY
This research paper is about the methodology that was developed as part of studies
conducted by the Naval Research Laboratory (NRL) and by NASA's Software Engineering
Laboratory (SEL).
This research paper is all about an effective data collection method for evaluating
software development methodologies and for studying the software development process. Data
can be collected at the same time using software development process in a software production
environment. As long as we keep the developmental process in a controlled manner, the resulted
data will be more accurate and complete. For every project validating the data is necessary even
interviews with project managers. Results from using the methodology show that data validation
is a necessary part of change data collection. If these things are not kept in mid then as much as
The purpose of this paper was to tell us how to obtain valid data that may be used both to
learn more about the software development process and to evaluate software development
The methodology explained in this paper has been used in two different environments to
study five software projects developed by groups with different backgrounds, using very
different software developmental methods. There are some basics steps which need to be kept in
software engineering experimentation are important courses in the light of this paper.
Certain attributes must be in data collection methodology to make it accurate and best.
For its accuracy we need to proceed data collection and validation at the same time in
development. Validating the data very carefully means that the data which is collected must be
very specified so that everyone can see the consistent view of the data that is collected.
For greatest usefulness, projects from software production environments involving teams
of programmers would be very approachable.it is also very important to specify the goals
because without them we can be at high risk of collecting the unrelated and meaningless data.
If the goals are specified for data collection then we can create a list of questions to be
answered by the study further. Both interviews and questionnaires are very important on asking a
series of questions. To use these two attributes interviews and questionnaires effectively,
questions and forms must be crafted carefully to ensure that the data collected is meaningful.
4. Conclusion.
From this research paper I have draw the following conclusions as a result in main points.
a) After studying all cases we came to known that we can collect data at the
environment.
[SHORTENED TITLE UP TO 50 CHARACTERS] 4
c) For every project validating the data is necessary even interviews with project
managers.
d) As long as we defined the methodology very well, we can get the goals of data
In this research paper there has been comparison of data collection in two different
environment there are some points which seriously need to be avoid or if they happened then
they need to be encountered which includes Clearly understanding the working environment and
change to be made will result in misclassification which needs to be not done in future. The
nature of the data collection methodology and its target environments do not generally permit
References
B. Boehm, "Software and its impact: A quantitative assessment", Datamation, vol. 19,