Course Title: Technology and Language Learning

Code: 312-ENG-2
Program: BA, English
Department: Department of English, Bisha Female Campus
Institution: University of Bisha
Academic Year: 1441-42
Semester: First Semester
Course Coordinator: Ammar Anas
Date: 15 /5/1442
 Table of Contents
A. Course Identification ................................................................................................ 3
B. Course Delivery .........................................................................................................3
1. Course Contact Hours (per semester) .................................................................................. 3
2. Topics not Covered ............................................................................................................ 3
3. Teaching Strategies ............................................................................................................. 3
4. Activities/Assessment Methods........................................................................................... 4
5. Verification of Credibility of Students’ Results ................................................................... 4
6. Recommendations............................................................................................................... 4
C. Student Results .........................................................................................................4
1. Distribution of Grades......................................................................................................... 4
2. Comment on Student Results .............................................................................................. 5
3.Recommendations ............................................................................................................... 5
D. Course Learning Outcomes ...................................................................................... 5
1. Course Learning Outcomes Assessment Results ................................................................. 5
2. Recommendations............................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined.
E. Course Quality Evaluation ...................................................................................... 5
1. Students Evaluation of the Quality of the Course ................................................................ 5
2. Other Evaluations ............................................................................................................... 6
3.Recommendations : ............................................................................................................. 6
F. Difficulties and Challenges........................................................................................ 6
G. Course Improvement Plan ....................................................................................... 7
1. Course Improvement Actions .............................................................................................. 7
2. Action Plan for Next Semester/Year ................................................................................. 7

2
 A. Course Identification

Number of Students
Number of
No Instructor(s) Location Starting the Completing
Sections
course the course
Department
of English,
Ammar Anas 1 24 24
Bisha Female
Campus

B. Course Delivery
1. Course Contact Hours (per semester)
No. Activity Planned Actual
1 Lecture 30 28
2 Laboratory/Studio NA NA
3 Tutorial NA NA
4 NA 2 hours for
Others(Specify)
midterm exam
Total 30 30

2. Topics not Covered

Extent of their
Reason
Topics Impact on Learning Compensating Action*
for Not Covering Outcomes
NA NA NA NA

*Compensating actions already taken or suggested

3. Teaching Strategies
Were They Difficulties
Planned Teaching Strategies Implemented? Experienced(if any) Suggested Action
Yes No in Implementation
Students were suggested
All lectures were planned
to use fast internet
to be delivered face to
connection. They were
Lectures  face but due to Covid 19
asked to use the recording
restrictions, all lectures
of the lectures for revising
were delivered online.
the teaching points.
A little issue of internet Students were advised to
e-Learning  connectivity use high internet speed
Lectures 
Discussion 
Presentations 

3
 4. Activities/Assessment Methods
Were They Difficulties
Implemented? Experienced(if
Activities/Planned Assessment Methods Suggested Action
Yes No any)in
Implementation
Quizzes Yes NA NA

Midterm Exam Yes NA NA

Activities (Class-Online) Yes NA NA

Assignments Yes NA NA
Students had lack of Teacher modeled the
confidence in participation and
participation in encouraged the
discussion during learners to
Participation Yes the lectures and participation without
online interactive any anxiety of
activities in online making errors.
discussion and
blogs.
Final Exam Yes NA NA

5. Verification of Credibility of Students’ Results

Method(s) of Verification Conclusions
Results were first verified by the reviewers. After that, head of the No mistake was found in the result.
department verified and approved the result.

6.Recommendations

C. Student Results

1. Distribution of Grades
Grades Status Distributions
In Progress

Incomplete

Withdrawn
Denied
Entry

Pass

A+ A B+ B C+ C D+ D F
Fail

Number of
3 2 1 6 5 3 1 2 1 0 0 0 23 1 0
Students
12.5 20.8 12.5 95.8
Percentage %
8.33 4.16 25%
3 %
4.16 8.33 4.16 0 0 0 3
4.16 0

4
 2. Comment on Student Results
(including special factors (if any) affecting the results)

3.Recommendations

D. Course Learning Outcomes

1. Course Learning OutcomesAssessment Results

Assessment
Course learning Outcomes PLOs Assessment Results Comment on
Target
(CLOs) Code Methods Assessment Results
Level/ Actual
Criterion Level
for Success
1 Knowledge and Understanding:
1.1 NA

1.2 NA

2 Skills:
2.1 NA

2.2 NA

2.3 NA

3 Values:
3.1 NA

3.2 NA

3.3 NA

2. Recommendations

E. Course Quality Evaluation

1. Students Evaluation of the Quality of the Course
Number of Percentage of
Date of Survey: Evaluation Result:
Participants: Participation:
Course Coordinator/Instructor
StudentsFeedback
Comments/Response
Strengths:



Areas for improvement:


5
 

Suggestions for Improvement:





2. Other Evaluations
(e.g., Evaluations byfaculty, program leaders, peer reviewers, others)
Evaluation method : Date:
Course Coordinator/Instructor
Evaluator(s)Comments
Comments/Response
Strengths:



Areas for improvement:




Suggestions for Improvement:




* Add separate table for each evaluation

3.Recommendations :

F. Difficulties and Challenges

Difficulties and Challenges Consequences Actions Taken
Administrative Issues

Learning Resources

Facilities

6
 G.Course Improvement Plan

1. Course ImprovementActions
Recommended Actions Taken Results Comments
Actions
a. Previous course Report Recommendations

b. Other Improvement Actions*

* (The developmental measures taken during teaching the course and not included in the development plan of it)

2. Action Plan for Next Semester/Year

Responsibility Time Needed
Recommendations Actions For
Implementation Start End Support
1.
2.
3.