Course Title: Listening and Speaking 1

Code: LSLA 211

Program: Bachelor’s Program in English
Department: Department of English Language
Institution: University of Jeddah - Alkamil college of science and
Arts
Academic Year: 2021/2022
Semester: First Semester
Course Coordinator: Balqees Alsulami
Date: 28-12-2021
 Table of Contents
A. Course Identification .................................................................................................... 3
B. Course Delivery............................................................................................................. 3
1. Course Contact Hours (per semester)...................................................................................... 3
2. Topics not Covered ................................................................................................................ 3
3. Teaching Strategies ................................................................................................................. 3
4. Activities/Assessment Methods .............................................................................................. 4
5. Verification of Credibility of Students’ Results ...................................................................... 4
6. Recommendations ................................................................................................................... 4
C. Student Results ............................................................................................................. 4
1. Distribution of Grades ............................................................................................................. 4
2. Comment on Student Results .................................................................................................. 4
3.Recommendations .................................................................................................................... 4
D. Course Learning Outcomes ......................................................................................... 5
1. Course Learning Outcomes Assessment Results .................................................................... 5
2. Recommendations ................................................................................................................... 5
E. Course Quality Evaluation ......................................................................................... 5
1. Students Evaluation of the Quality of the Course ................................................................... 5
2. Other Evaluations .................................................................................................................... 6
3.Recommendations : .................................................................................................................. 6
F. Difficulties and Challenges ........................................................................................... 6
G. Course Improvement Plan .......................................................................................... 7
1. Course Improvement Actions.................................................................................................. 7
2. Action Plan for Next Semester/Year ..................................................................................... 7

2
 A. Course Identification

Number of Students
Number of
No Instructor(s) Location Starting the Completing
Sections
course the course
Balqees Naga Alsulami Blackboard 1 15 9

B. Course Delivery
1. Course Contact Hours (per semester)
No. Activity Planned Actual
1 Lecture 3 hours a week 3 hours a week
2 Laboratory/Studio
3 Tutorial
4 Others (Specify)
Total 48 48

2. Topics not Covered

Extent of their
Reason
Topics for Not Covering
Impact on Learning Compensating Action*
Outcomes
Chapters 8-10 Students needed None Provided students with all
extended time to materials needed to
complete a complete the book, and
chapter. emphasized the
importance of self-learning
in order to perform better
in future courses.

*Compensating actions already taken or suggested

3. Teaching Strategies
Were They Difficulties
Planned Teaching Strategies Implemented? Experienced (if any) Suggested Action
Yes No in Implementation
Lectures None
Role-playing None
Group discussions None
Guided and independent practice None
Audiovisual demonstrations None

3
 4. Activities/Assessment Methods
Were They Difficulties
Activities/Planned Assessment Methods Implemented? Experienced (if any) Suggested Action
Yes No in Implementation
Exams
Quizzes
Assignments
Role-Playing
Project

5. Verification of Credibility of Students’ Results

Method(s) of Verification Conclusions
Samples of exam papers were reviewed by independent Level of fairness is high
reviewer from the department.

6. Recommendations

C. Student Results

1. Distribution of Grades
Grades Status Distributions
In Progress

Incomplete

Withdrawn
Denied
Entry

Pass

Fail

A+ A B+ B C+ C D+ D F

Number of
1 1 1 6 3 3 9 3 1
Students
6.6 6.6 6.6 40 20 20 60 20 6.6
Percentage
% % % % % % % % %

2. Comment on Student Results

(including special factors (if any) affecting the results)

4
 3.Recommendations

D. Course Learning Outcomes

1. Course Learning Outcomes Assessment Results

Assessment
Course learning Outcomes PLOs Assessment Results Comment on
Target
(CLOs) Code Methods Assessment Results
Level/ Actual
Criterion Level
for Success
1 Knowledge and Understanding:
Employ knowledge of K1 Assignm 47.5% 35.46%
language skills with high ents,
competency level Quizzes,
1.1
Midterm
and Final
Exam
1.2

1.3

1...

2 Skills:
Practice the language in its S1 Assignm 42.5% 32.52
oral and/or written forms ents, %
and effectively Quizzes,
2.1
communicate by applying Midterm
all the language skills. , Final
Exam.
2.2

2.3

2...

3 Values:
Communicate effectively as C1 Groups 10% 6.9%
a member or leader of a and
team that establishes and individu
3.1 achieves goals, meets al
deadlines, and creates a projects,
conducive learning role-
environment. playing.
3.2

3.3

3...

5
 2. Recommendations

E. Course Quality Evaluation

1. Students Evaluation of the Quality of the Course
Number of Percentage of
Date of Survey: Evaluation Result:
Participants: 7 Participation: 46%
Course Coordinator/Instructor
Students Feedback
Comments/Response
Strengths:
 The pre-established lines (including information
and skills the course aims to develop were clear to
students.
 The course materials were presented in a clear
manner that facilitated understanding.
 The online course platform was updated and
accurate.
 Feedback was provided in a timely manner.

Areas for improvement:



Suggestions for Improvement:





2. Other Evaluations
(e.g., Evaluations by faculty, program leaders, peer reviewers, others)
Evaluation method : Date:
Course Coordinator/Instructor
Evaluator(s) Comments
Comments/Response
Strengths:



Areas for improvement:




Suggestions for Improvement:




* Add separate table for each evaluation

6
 3.Recommendations :

F. Difficulties and Challenges

Difficulties and Challenges Consequences Actions Taken
Administrative Issues
No marks on students Higher percentage of low- Added 5 marks for the Oral
practicing speaking skill in responding students in class Quiz.
class. discussions.

Learning Resources
The books were not easy to The teacher found a soft copy
obtain since they’re older online and sent it to every
versions, while the newer student in class.
versions don’t have any CDs
nor recordings available
online.

Facilities

G. Course Improvement Plan

1. Course Improvement Actions

Recommended
Actions Taken Results Comments
Actions
a. Previous course Report Recommendations

b. Other Improvement Actions*

7
 * (The developmental measures taken during teaching the course and not included in the development plan of it)

2. Action Plan for Next Semester/Year

Responsibility Time Needed
Recommendations Actions For
Implementation Start End Support
1. Check books availability
before the start of the - Course teacher -
semester.
2.
3.