ASES - Chapterwise Micro level Action plan Closure summary & Timeline

Timeline for June & July-2021

Total Closure
Chapter Items Open Closed W3 W4
points Percentage
14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24

Completed
1 Quality Policy and Assurance System 11 11 0 0%

Analysis of the quality concerns for

2
current products
20 3 17 85%

Completed
3 Project Management 20 18 2 10%
A
S
E 4 Process Design and Pre production 12 12 0 0%
S

C
H 5 Ramp up Activity 1 1 0 0% Partially
A completed
P
T
E
R
6 Operator Training 8 0 8 100%
S

Completed
7 Shop Floor Management 39 10 29 74%

8 Change Management 14 10 4 29%

9 Sub-suppliers Management 6 0 6 100%

Total 65 66 50.38%

RNTBCI Name

Ankit , Gaurav,
Reviewed by
Sanjeev

Approv Mahesh Kumar C

ed by & Pardeep Taneja

# 000000Confidential C
 Doc. No. IQMS-C060-F-0003

re summary & Timeline Revision 1

Rev. Date 3/1/2019

Timeline for June & July-2021

Status (Points to be Closed per
W4 W5 & W1 W2
week )
25 28 29 30 1 2 3 5 6 7 8 9 10

Completed
W4=5 closed
W5& W1=6 closed

W4=3 closed

W4=6 closed
W5& W1=6 closed
W2=6 closed
W4=4 closed
W5& W1=4 closed
W2=4 closed

Partially W3=1 closed

completed

W3=4 closed
W5&W1=4 closed

W3=13 closed
W5&W1=13 closed
W2=14 closed

W4=5 closed
W5 & W1=5 closed
W2=4 closed

W3=3 closed
W2=3 closed

# 000000Confidential C
# Chapter 1: Quality policy and quality assurance system Supplier Name Function Date

Open Prepared by Gaurav QMS Incharge 21.09.20

Close Approved by Mahesh Kumar Plant Head 21.09.20

Renault Nissan
Question Date Phenomenon Requirement from RNTBCI (From ASES report) Actions from supplier Pilot Target Date Actual Date Technico Status
Status

Next Audit Cycle (Dec'-20) complete store department process shall be covered
1.1 Store department has single process but only BOP store audit is being performed. Gaurav 6/23/2021 Close Open
and schedule to be revised.

1.1 30.04.21 Internal audit NC classification (Major / Minor) & closure timeline Internal audit NC clasification and closure timline to be update Gaurav 6/23/2021 Open Open

1.1 30.04.21 Internal audit NC tracking sheet not updated the current NC status Internal audit NC tracking sheet to be updated Gaurav 6/23/2021 Open Open

1.1 30.04.21 Internal audit NC report not evidenced. Internal audit NC report to be prepared Gaurav 6/23/2021 Open Open

1.1 30.04.21 Process audit NC closure timeline not defined in the procedure Process audit NC clouser timeline to be defined Gaurav 6/23/2021 Open Open

List of process & product auditor not available.

1.1 30.04.21 List of process and product auditor to be prepared Gaurav 6/23/2021 Open Open
Process & product records not evidenced during the review.

1.1 30.04.21 Process parameter verification not evidenced in internal audit Porcess paramter to be verified in internal audit Gaurav 6/29/2021 Open Open

1.1 ASES report IATF Auditors list is available but contingency for auditor not define in it. IATF Auditor list to be update. Gaurav 6/29/2021 Close Open

1.2 ASES report Process Audit Plan available but not updated for the Aug-20 month. Process Audit to be update Gaurav 6/29/2021 Close Open

1.2 ASES report Process Parameter observation for the SDH not evident in the report. Process Audit Report to be cross-verify after audit. Ashwani, Rishu, Vinod 6/29/2021 Open Open

Process Audit performed for the pedal wrt customer complaint, but its
1.2 ASES report Customer Complaint details wrt corrective actions to be considered. Ashwani, Rishu, Vinod 6/29/2021 Close Open
observation define as "OK"

Open 7 11

Close 4 0

Total 11 11

% Action Implemented 36% 0%

# 000000Confidential C
 Warranty - gaurav Pankaj-
Mayank Chaudry- Internal 8D
Gupta QMS analysis

# Chapter 2: Analysis of the quality concerns for current products Supplier Name Function Date

QMS -
Open Prepared by Gaurav 21.09.2020
Incharge

Close Approved by Mahesh Kumar C Plant Head 21.09.2020

Question Date Phenomenon Requirement from RNTBCI (From ASES report) Actions from supplier Pilot Target Date Actual Date Technico Status Renault Nissan Status

1(a&b). Training to be provided to

concern person for the deep drill
analysis.
1. No depth cause analysis for customer concerns. Feb'21 Customer concern Hinge Hood - Nut shift
1c. Other Customer Complaint
a) Quality tools application such as Ishikawa, Cause validation / verification, Fault tree or similar is missing.
Quaity tools like C&E diagram, Verification & Validation, etc not used for the Tracking Sheet to be incorporate
b) Why why analysis is performed but it is not drilled down till final why to identify the real root cause.
2.3 30.04.21 Customr concerns, atleast demonstrate for 2 or 3 concerns with detailed Quality with the same summary sheet. Gaurav & Mayank Close Close
c) Customer complaint tracking sheet only for MSIL. Others not available. Need to have common tracking sheet.
tools analysis as per the defined procuedure. 1d. CAPA Format to be used in
d) Fishbone & Cause validation not followed as per procedure
customer complints as well.
e) Concern effectiveness monitoring not clear - Oct'20 - closed - not to be followed for complaint date/ corrective action
1e. Procedure wrt effective
monitoring to be revised.

Warranty complaint Procedure

Procedure not covers analysis for both Occurrence & non detection.
Procedure not cover the 8D tracking sheet updation
2.2 30.04.21 Procedure not coered the timeline for effectiveness monitoring & each activities. Procedure updated for all key steps Gaurav Close Close
Procedure not covered the key step incase of repeated concerns do analysis with
the helop of Tool / Machine manufacturer/ Coprporate support.
Procedure not covered the Horizontal deployment activity with timeline

QEM contact person list to be

2.2 08.06.21 OEM contact members list for warranty not available. Mayank 6/21/2021 Open
prepared for warranty concerns

Warranty register not covered some of the key activities like Customer, Within
2.2 30.04.21 warranty or not, NTF, 8D report, etc Warranty register to be updated Mayank Close Close
Warranty performance results from customer to be shown for FY21.

Customer complaint Procedure

Procedure not covers analysis for both Occurrence & non detection.
Procedure not cover the 8D tracking sheet updation
2.3 30.04.21 Procedure not coered the timeline for effectiveness monitoring & each activities. Procedure updated for all key steps Gaurav Close Close
Procedure not covered the key step incase of repeated concerns do analysis with
the helop of Tool / Machine manufacturer/ Coprporate support.
Procedure not covered the Horizontal deployment activity with timeline

Procedure defined which includes

2.3 30.04.21 No procedure defined for the internal rejection analysis. top 3 rejection + safety regulatory Gaurav Close Close
defects analysis, etc.

2. Defect selection criteria is not clear for Inhouse cause analysis. No cause analysis / actions available for top inhouse 2.(a,b,&f) Procedure for CAPA to
defect in Mar2020. Ex. Gauge NG - Part: Door hinge YP8 RUL, Qty 70 nos. be be revised considered the
selection criteria for the inhouse
a. Internal rejection Target : not shared cause analysis, the phenomenon
b. Top 3 defect & Top 1 model to be mentioned in procedure analysis and effectiveness
c. Angle NG - Sep'20 - YE3 MC HH LH - Spec 86.5 Deg - 1.5 Deg found 89 Deg monitoring.
2.3 ASES · Valid cause : Shut height variation not analysed. Restrike tool not available Gaurav Close Close
2.(c &d) External Training to be
d. Internal analysis done only for Assy process. Stamping not found. provided to the concern person for
e. Summary sheet for all process need to be aligned. the why-why, root cause analysis.
f. 3 months monitoring not followed for YRA dent issue - followed for 3 lots – Need to update in procedure 2e. Common Pareto and Summary
Sheet Formato to develop and same
to be shared.

000000Confidential C
#
 Warranty - gaurav Pankaj-
Mayank Chaudry- Internal 8D
Gupta QMS analysis

# Chapter 2: Analysis of the quality concerns for current products Supplier Name Function Date

QMS -
Open Prepared by Gaurav 21.09.2020
Incharge

Close Approved by Mahesh Kumar C Plant Head 21.09.2020

Question Date Phenomenon Requirement from RNTBCI (From ASES report) Actions from supplier Pilot Target Date Actual Date Technico Status Renault Nissan Status

* Internal rejection analysis not taken for the top 3 defects in each sections. Ex:
Thread wash out Aswani, Vinod &
11.05.21 Close Close
* Internal rejection analysis not in depth for Gauge not answering. Rishu

ASES/ Phenomenon wise analysis not available based on the customer effect.
2.3 Mayank 6/21/2021 Open Open
11.05.21 Ex: Screw jack
Terminology to be define in the the
CAPA procedure and in the CAPA
Summary for the mandatory
documents (such as PFD, PFMEA,
Control Plan, SOP, WI) shall be
updated during the closure any
4. Affected documents are not identified and updated for Customer / Inhouse CAPA. Ex. PFMEA, Control plan etc.,
customer concern.
Customer Defect Handling:-
a. No training record available for the Maintenance operator, no re-calibration record not available
Customer defect Handling:-
List of affected documents not updated for the customer concern on Feb'21 Nut b. No change in calibration frequency. Calibration date not in-line with analysis report Aswani, Vinod &
2.4 11.05.21 4a. All the record to be attached Close Close
shift in Hood Hinge- PM check sheet not updated. c. Concern effectiveness monitoring not clear - Oct'20 - closed - not to be followed for complaint date/ corrective action. Rishu
with Customer complaints and other
issue closure.
Inhouse handling:-
4b. Re-analysis to be done the
a. Document Update : Restrike process added but Control plan, FMEA, Work instruction not updated
calibration frequency.
4c. Procedure to be revised.

Inhouse Handling:-
4a. Training to be provide for the
5. Horizonal deployment opportunities are not identified through study and not implemented where it is applicable. Ex. document updation wrt CAPA.
Side Door Hinge - YE3, Defect: Flatness NG, Similar parts: 13.
Horizontal Deployment
Customer Defect Handling:-
effectiveness sheet to be developed
a.Horizontal deployment not evident for other riveting machines Aswani, Vinod
2.4 ASES report and linkage to be done with the Close Close
,Rishu & mayank
procedure and same to be verify for
the effectively implementation.
Inhouse Handling:-
a. Horizontal deployment not clear – BDH – K10 identified, but already restrike process exists with that part

6. Past trouble database is not prepared based on past customer / inhouse concerns CAPA.
Past trouble data sheet and lesson
Customer Defect Handling:-
learnt sheet to be develop and
a. PTDB only Tier 1 actions added – PTDB covers only generic data not based on customer or internal analysis - Excess
linkage to be done with the
play not captured. Aswani, Vinod
2.4 ASES report procedure accordingly. Close Close
b. PTDB contents not matching with cause analysis and technical lessons learnt not available ,Rishu & mayank
PDTB for the other program/project
c. No responsible person and last update date available
to be develop and save it in the
record.
Inhouse Handling :-
a. No PTDB followed for Internal cause analysis and no Technical lessons learnt followed for Internal analysis

Lessons Learnt photos not covered photos.

2.4 08.06.21 7. Lesson learnt and data base is not prepared on past customer / inhouse concerns CAPA. Same as above point. Mayank 6/21/2021 Close Open
Lessons Learnt from Bangalore plant / chennai not available.

Repeated concerns monitoring is not defined and special attention is not defined Repeated Issue handling criteria to
2.4 11.05.21 8. Repeated concerns monitoring is not defined and special attention is not defined for repeated concerns. Gaurav Close Close
for repeated concerns. be define in the CAPA procedure.

No list of affected documents not updated for the internal 8D actions. Ex: Apr'21 Aswani, Vinod &
2.4 25.05.21 To be prepared Close Close
Nut Spatter - CP/ PFMEA not updated Rishu

Aswani, Vinod &

2.3 25.05.21 No internal 8D report available for Assy stations rejection top concerns To be prepared Close Close
Rishu

No actual date available for the internal 8D actions iplementation, Document

2.3 25.05.21 CAPA format to be revised Gaurav Close Close
updations, Horizontal deployment, etc,.

No horizontal deployment of internal 8D actions. Ex: Apr'21 Gauge not Aswani, Vinod &
2.4 11.05.21 To be update Close Close
answering / Gap issue, etc.Boss Gauge Out Rishu
No tracking sheet available for the internal 8D report which includes past years Aswani, Vinod &
2.5 11.05.21 To be prepared Close Close
also Rishu

Customer complaint Tracking sheet not covered the timeline with Plan / Actual
2.5 11.05.21 To be update Mayank Close Close
date to track the activities

000000Confidential C
#
 Warranty - gaurav Pankaj-
Mayank Chaudry- Internal 8D
Gupta QMS analysis

# Chapter 2: Analysis of the quality concerns for current products Supplier Name Function Date

QMS -
Open Prepared by Gaurav 21.09.2020
Incharge

Close Approved by Mahesh Kumar C Plant Head 21.09.2020

Question Date Phenomenon Requirement from RNTBCI (From ASES report) Actions from supplier Pilot Target Date Actual Date Technico Status Renault Nissan Status

Open 1 3

Close 18 17

Total 19 20

% Action
95% 85%
Implemented

000000Confidential C
#
# Chapter 3: Project Management Supplier Name Function Date

QMS -
Open Prepared by Gaurav 21.09.2020 Irshad
Incharge

Close Approved by Mahesh Kumar Plant Head 21.09.2020

Question Date Phenomenon Requirement from RNTBCI (From ASES report) Actions from supplier Pilot Target Date Actual Date Status

Phase review meeting timing is not addressed in the Capture the Phase review meeting timeline in the APQP Phase review meetinng timeline to be
3-4 ASES Report Irshad 6/22/2021 Open
APQP time plan time plan. Ex Screw jack updated

Phase review checksheet, control items with quantified Define checksheet, control items with quantified target
3-4 ASES Report Phase review checksheet to be prepared Irshad 6/22/2021 Open
target is not defined. to phase review process.

Conduct the phase review meeting according to the plan

Record for phase review meeting, previous meeting and record the review status. Also, review previous
3-4 ASES Report Phase review meeting to done and recorded Irshad 6/22/2021 Open
open points status is not evidenced meeting open
points status and record the same

Past troubles and lesson learning incorporation / Add Past troubles & lesson learnt incorporation as Past trouble and lesson learnt to be
3-4 ASES Report Irshad 6/22/2021 Open
implementation is not considered for phase approval. criteria for phase approval. incorporated for phase approval

Define and follow the phase approval process. Ex. Top

3-4 ASES Report Phase approval is not defined and followed. management approval based on control items result Phase approval to be defined and followed Irshad 6/22/2021 Open
achievement

Project Organization chart not available for the Screw

3-3 25.05.21 Project organization chart to be prepared Irshad Close
jack - Nissan Project

There is no standard of the project numbers for which

3-3 25.05.21 To be defined in procedure Gaurav Close
one project manager can be in charge of it.

No evidenced for the Feasibility study results &

Feasibility study results with comparision
3-3 25.05.21 comparision study for the PPM target, Ranking target, Sanjeev Anil (Design) 6/29/2021 Open
study to be prepared
Warranty target.

SMS wk details wrongly updated for Screw Jack part

Details to be corrected and review plan to be
3-3 25.05.21 SMS Internal project review meeting plan not updated Irshad 6/29/2021 Open
updated in SMS
in SMS.

Some of the activities got delayed & no revised plan for

3-3 25.05.21 Tool micro level plan to be prepared Irshad 6/29/2021 Open
the tool related activites. Ex: Tool micro level plan.

000000Confidential C
#
# Chapter 3: Project Management Supplier Name Function Date

QMS -
Open Prepared by Gaurav 21.09.2020 Irshad
Incharge

Close Approved by Mahesh Kumar Plant Head 21.09.2020

Question Date Phenomenon Requirement from RNTBCI (From ASES report) Actions from supplier Pilot Target Date Actual Date Status

SMS - Training plan not made for the VC lot/ PT1/ PT2
milestones. Training plan to be made for each milestones
3-3 25.05.21 SMS- Control plan not planned before VC lot & not Sanjeev Control plan activity to be planned Irshad 6/29/2021 Open Closed
prepared yet. Capability study to be planned
SMS- Capability study not planned for the VC lot.

No internal project review meeting & Minutes of Internal project review meeting & Minutes of meeting
3-3 25.05.21 Internal review meeting mom ro be prepared Irshad 6/29/2021 Open
meeting not evidenced for Nissan- Screw jack parts evidenced for Nissan- Screw jack parts to be shown

No project risk assessment carried out for the Nissan Project risk assessment to be shown for the Nissan
3-3 25.05.21 Project risk assessment to be prepared Anil (Design) 6/29/2021 Open
Project - Screw Jack. Project - Screw Jack.

No evidenced for the design review meeting & minutes Evidenced to be shown for the design review meeting
3-3 25.05.21 Design review minutes to be prepared Anil (Design) 6/29/2021 Open
before end of the design milestone. & minutes before end of the design milestone.

Some key activities are not captured in Technico's

APQP timing plan. No micro level activity and timing
Refer ANPQP requirements and add the missing Macro As per ANPQP requirement prepared micro
3-3 ASES Report plan is defined according to Irshad 7/6/2021 Open
and Micro level activities into the APQP timing plan level timing plan to be prepared
ANPQP requirement. Ex. Ramp up activity, Floor plan
layout etc.,

CFT participation for APQP timing plan preparation is

not witnessed. No CFT signature is evidenced. Timing CFT participation & confirmation to be shown for
3-3 ASES Report CFT signoff to be done in APQP timing plan Irshad 7/6/2021 Open
plan revision details are Nissan Screw jack part
not recorded.

Progress review frequency is not defined in the Capture the progress review meeting frequency in the
Process review meeting frequency to be
procedure. Progress review meeting plan vs actual procedure and timeline in the APQP timing plan. Gaurav &
3-3 ASES Report defined in procedure and review meeting 7/6/2021 Open
status is not captured in the Conduct the review Irshad
plan vs actual to be captured in timing plan
APQP timing plan. as per plan and update the status accordingly.

Minutes of Meeting is made for progress review

meeting but activities completion status, recovery plan Activity completion status and recovery plan
3-3 ASES Report MOM to be evidenced for the meeting Irshad 7/6/2021 Open
for delayed activities are not for delayed activity to be prepared
available.

No evidenced for the past troubles & lessons learnt PTDB & Lesson learn for screw jack design
3-3 25.05.21 Anil (Design) 7/6/2021 Open
fedback to Screw jack Design. to be prepared

3-3 25.05.21 No SPPMP evidenced for the Nissan Screw jack parts. Sanjeev SPPMP to be prepared Irshad 7/6/2021 Open

000000Confidential C
#
# Chapter 3: Project Management Supplier Name Function Date

QMS -
Open Prepared by Gaurav 21.09.2020 Irshad
Incharge

Close Approved by Mahesh Kumar Plant Head 21.09.2020

Question Date Phenomenon Requirement from RNTBCI (From ASES report) Actions from supplier Pilot Target Date Actual Date Status

Open 18

Close 2

Total 20

% Action
Implemente 10%
d

000000Confidential C
#
# Chapter 4: Process Design and Pre production Supplier Name Function Date

Open Prepared by Gaurav QMS - Incharge 21.09.2020

Close Approved by Mahesh Kumar C Plant Head 21.09.2020

Question ASES Phenomenon Requirement from RNTBCI (From ASES report) Actions from supplier Pilot Target Date Actual Date Status

Some key information like PFMEA preparation /

4.1 ASES report Capture the PFMEA preparation / review condition in the procedure To be defined procedure / WI Gaurav 6/23/2021 Open
review condition is not captured in the procedure

Some potential failure mode in Projection

welding process are not captured in the PFMEA. FMEA to be reviewed for all
4.1 ASES report Revisit each process PFMEA to add missing potential failure mode Naveen 6/23/2021 Open
Ex. Failure Mode: Reverse nut weld, Nut offset missing failure modes
etc.,.

Effect of failure identified is inappropriate. Ex.

Process: Blanking, Defect: Burr, Next Process Discuss with CFT and Customer to revisit and address the appropriate FMEA to be reviewed for failure
4.1 ASES report Naveen 6/23/2021 Open
effect is mentioned as no discernible effect effect of failure. effects
instead of 100% rework.

Severity rating is not assigned inline to AIAG

FMEA to be reviewed for ranking
4.1 ASES report guideline. Ex. Severity is rated as 2 instead of 6 Refer the AIAG guideline and reassign the Severity rating accordingly Naveen 6/23/2021 Open
as per AIAG guidelines
for Burr and 6 instead of 7 for Crack

Define the period to past rejection data. Collect and formalise the data
No past rejection data is collected and used to Past rejection data to be collected
4.1 ASES report according to AIAG guideline to assign occurrence Naveen 6/30/2021 Open
assign Occurrence rating for assign occurrence rating
rating.

Consolidate the past troubles with root causes / actions and lesson learnt
Review of PTDB and lesson learn
Past troubles / lesson learnt applicability and as data base. Conduct the review during PFMEA
4.1 ASES report for applicability during FMEA Naveen 6/30/2021 Open
deployment status is reviewed preparation to identify the applicability. Follow action plan to deploy the
preparation to be done
applicable past troubles.

Recommended actions are not initiated fas per

Recommende action to be taken as
4.1 ASES report threshold limit. Ex. High RPN - 98 for Crack, Recommended actions to be initiated fas per threshold limit. Naveen 6/30/2021 Open
per defined criteria
Nut missing, Thread damage etc.,

Revision level and revision history details are Revison level and history to be
4.1 ASES report Revision level and revision history details to be captured in the PFMEA Naveen 6/30/2021 Open
not captured in the PFMEA captured in FMEA work sheet

Drawing change level and control plan revision

Drawing change level, control plan
level with change history is not captured in the Capture the latest drawing change level and control plan revision level
4.2 ASES report revision with change history to be Pramod 7/7/2021 Open
control plan. Ex. Drawing revision level is 00 / with change history in the control plan.
capture control sheet
09.09.18

Control method assigning criteria is not

respected against procedure. Ex. Defect: Crack, Revisit the control plan to capture
Revisit the control plan to capture the control method according to criteria
4.2 ASES report Severity - 7, Control method is defined as the control method according to Pramod 7/7/2021 Open
defined in the procedure
Sampling (3nos / 100 nos) instead of 100% criteria defined in the procedure
visual inspection

000000Confidential C
#
# Chapter 4: Process Design and Pre production Supplier Name Function Date

Open Prepared by Gaurav QMS - Incharge 21.09.2020

Close Approved by Mahesh Kumar C Plant Head 21.09.2020

Question ASES Phenomenon Requirement from RNTBCI (From ASES report) Actions from supplier Pilot Target Date Actual Date Status

Some of the process parameters are not captured

Revisit the control plan to include
4.2 ASES report in the control plan. Ex. Process: Blanking, Revisit the control plan to include the missing process parameter Pramod 7/7/2021 Open
the missing process parameter
Process Parameter: Shut height

Some of the drawing requirements are not

Revisit the control plan to add the
4.2 ASES report addressed in the control plan. Ex. Burr allowed Revisit the control plan to add the missing drawing requirements Pramod 7/7/2021 Open
missing drawing requirements
limit is 0.15 mm maximum

Open 12

Close 0

Total 12

% Action Implemented 0%

000000Confidential C
#
# Chapter 5: Ramp up Activity Supplier Name Function Date

Open Prepared by Saurabh Kumar Malhotra QMS - Incharge 21.09.2020

Close Approved by Pardeep Taneja Plant Head 21.09.2020

Question Phenomenon Requirement from RNTBCI (From ASES report) Actions from supplier Pilot Target Date Actual Date Status

5.1 Ramp up activity plan not available for Nissan model Screw Jack Ramp up activity plan to be prepared for Nissan model Screw Jack Ramp up activity plan to be prepared for Nissan model Screw Jack Irshad 6/19/2021 Open

Open 1

Close 0

Total 1

% Action Implemented 0%

# 000000Confidential C
# Chapter 6: Operator Training 6 Supplier Name Function Date

Open Prepared by Gaurav QMS - Incharge 21.09.2020

Close Approved by Mahesh Kumar C Plant Head 21.09.2020

Question Phenomenon Requirement from RNTBCI (From ASES report) Actions from supplier Pilot Target Date Actual Date Status Internal Status

1. New operator training and skill evaluation records are not available for assessed case.
Ex. Mr. Satrugan, Employee code: 600209, Process: Tandum , Mr. Sonu yadav, New Operator Training and skill records to be maintained within the
6.1 Chandra Pal & Indu Yadav Close Close
Employee code: 11873, Process: ASSY, Mr. Ratnesh yadav, Employee code: 46039, HRD.
Process: Tandam - DOJ: 03-01-2020.

2. Training & skill evaluation records are not available for existing operators. Ex. Mr. Training and skill evaluation activity going on and their record to be
6.1 Aditya, Surjeet, Amit Close Close
Shivashankar, Process: Manual projection welding, Skill level as per Skill matrix - L2. verify by the HOD before hand overing it to the HR.

3. Reinforced inspection for new operator produced parts is not defined and followed. Ex.
Rule for the Reinforced inspection for new operator produced to be
6.1 Mr. Satrugan, Employee code: 600209, Process: Tandum , Mr. Sonu yadav, Employee Aditya, Surjeet, Amit 6/16/2021 Open Close
define and training for the same to be given.
code: 11873, DOJ: 03-01-2020.

4. Operator observation plan and records are not available. Ex. Mr. Satrugan, Process: Operator observation plan for the individual section to be develop
6.1 Aditya, Surjeet, Amit Close Close
Tandam, Mr. Shivashankar, Process: Manual projection welding. and followed .

New Project Training plan not covered for the PT1 / PT2 New Project Training plan which should covered for the PT1 / PT2 additional operators,
6.1 11.06.21 New project training plan to be updated Irshad 6/16/2021 Open Close
additional operators, etc. etc.

New project training manual not included in the difference b/w New project training manual which includes the difference b/w existing project & new
11.06.21 existing project & new project Process flow, Defect includes project Process flow, Defect includes appearance, Rework matrix, Appearance defects, Training module to be updated Irshad 6/16/2021 Open Close
appearance, Rework matrix, Appearance defects, etc. etc.

No refreshment training defined for the operators long No refreshment training check sheet to be defined for the operators long absenteeism. Ex:
11.06.21 Refreshment training check sheet to be prepared and implemented Gaurav 6/16/2021 Open Close
absenteeism. Ex: More than 1 month Absent More than 1 month Absent

Operator Training manual not available for the operators which

Operator Training manual which should includes
should includes
1. W.I 2. Management of non-conforming parts;
1. W.I 2. Management of non-conforming parts;
3. unusual situations;
3. unusual situations;
4. How to handle measuring instruments;
4. How to handle measuring instruments;
11.06.21 5. observance items of control plans; New operator training module to be prepared Chandra Pal & Indu Yadav 6/16/2021 Open Close
5. observance items of control plans;
6. Product Knowledge
6. Product Knowledge
7. Rework
7. Rework
8. Environmental and Safety
8. Environmental and Safety
9..Safety and regulation product(if apply)
9..Safety and regulation product(if apply)

New Operator produced parts not cross verified by QA person or

11.06.21 New Operator produced parts to be cross verified by QA person or senior operators. System for cross verification of produces part to be implemented Gaurav 6/16/2021 Open Close
senior operators

New Operator Skill level not decided based on Theoretical +

11.06.21 New Operator Skill level to be decided based on Theoretical + practical test System to be made for preactical evaluation for new operator Gaurav 6/16/2021 Open Close
practical test

000000Confidential C
#
# Chapter 6: Operator Training 6 Supplier Name Function Date

Open Prepared by Gaurav QMS - Incharge 21.09.2020

Close Approved by Mahesh Kumar C Plant Head 21.09.2020

Question Phenomenon Requirement from RNTBCI (From ASES report) Actions from supplier Pilot Target Date Actual Date Status Internal Status

11.06.21 Operator feedback not given based on the operation observation. Operator feedback to be given based on the operation observation. Provison to give feedback to operator after observation to be defined Gaurav 6/16/2021 Open Close

Open 8

Close 3

Total 11

% Action Implemented 27%

000000Confidential C
#
# Chapter 7: Shop Floor 18 Supplier Name Function Date

Open Prepared by Gaurav QMS - Incharge 21.09.2020

Close Approved by Mahesh Kumar C Plant Head 21.09.2020

Requirement from RNTBCI (From

Question Date Phenomenon Actions from supplier Pilot Target Date Actual Date Status Internal status
ASES report)
Rejection register to be prepared
which includes Supplier name, Part
No rejection register available for the parts stored in Rejection register for incoming
7.1 11.06.21 detail, date of received, Qty, Target Dalbir 6/22/2021 Open Closed
Quarantine area rejection to be prepared
date for disposal & actual date of
Some key checkpoints are not defined and confirmed disposal, etc.
Add missing checkpoints in the start
during daily start up check. Ex. Checkpoint: Brake / All key characteristics to be added in
7.2 ASES report up checksheet and educate the Surjeet, Aditya and Vinod 6/22/2021 Open Closed
clutch pressure 4~6 startup check sheet
concerned members.
KG/CM2.
Conduct start up check according to
Start up check is not performed during 2nd shift. Start up check to be ennsured in 2nd
7.2 ASES report the checksheet at 2nd shift start and Surjeet, Aditya and Vinod 6/22/2021 Open Closed
(Followed at 1st shift only). shift
record the results.
Quantity measurement items are not recorded with
measured values, OK tick mark only available. Ex. Record the actual measurement values Actual observation to be recorded for
7.2 ASES report Surjeet, Aditya and Vinod 6/22/2021 Open Closed
Checkpoint: Counter balance for quantified measurement items. all process paramters
pressure 4~6 KG/CM2.
Product dimensions & process
Product dimensions & process parameter not Actual value to be written
7.2 11.06.21 parameter to be verified & Surjeet, Aditya and Vinod 6/22/2021 Open Closed
write the exact value. Ex: Rivet Diameter against the product dimensions
record the actual value.
No specific place defined in the start up checksheet /
Create a provision in the start up
production log to keep track of corrective actions /
checksheet / production log book to Provision to be made for tracking
deviations done for start up Gaurav, Surjeet, Aditya and
7.2 ASES report keep track of corrective actions / correcitve action for start up non 6/22/2021 Open Closed
non conformity. Vinod
deviation done for conformity
No records available after corrective action taken for
start up non conformity
the defects during production Add the checkpoint in startup check
sheet as "Confirm the removal of
During change over, removal of previous model input
previous model input / output parts, Check point to be added in startup Gaurav, Surjeet, Aditya and
7.2 ASES report / output part, tooling, packing etc., is not checked and 6/22/2021 Open Closed
tooling, packing check sheet Vinod
recorded.
from workstation and put them at
Some process parameters are not captured in work specified area".
instruction or set up table and not checked during Add missing process parameters in
model change over. Ex. the work instruction and set up table. Missing process parameters to be
Gaurav, Surjeet, Aditya and
7.3 ASES report Process: Progressive Stamping, Process parameter: Verify the same during model change added in work instruction and setup 6/22/2021 Open Closed
Vinod
Shut height 798+/-1 mm, Part: Side door hinge Male, over and table
Machine: Press 600 ton record the results.
PLNP11.
Check point to be added in start up Check point to be added in start up
Check point to be added in start up check sheet to
check sheet to ensure the red bin is in check sheet to ensure the red bin is in Gaurav, Surjeet, Aditya and
7.3 11.06.21 ensure the red bin is in empty condition before start 6/22/2021 Open Closed
empty condition before start of the empty condition before start of the Vinod
of the shift.
shift. shift.
Define the process adjustment
Adjustment instruction not available in shop floor.
instruction including skill level
Ex: Air pressure, Hydraulic pressure, Welding
requirement. Educate and evaluate the
parameter, etc. Adjustment instructions to be Gaurav, Surjeet, Aditya and
7.3 ASES report members for process 6/22/2021 Open Closed
Process adjustment instruction is not defined. Ex. prepared for process paramters Vinod
adjustment condition. Display the
Projection welding process, Defect: Thread
qualified members list at respective
shrinkage, Nut separation, Assy, etc.,
work station
Restart up rule and evidence for restart up activity is
Define the criteria for restart up along
not available. Ex. Restart up condition: after trial
with reaction plan. Educate the Criteria for restartup with reaction Gaurav, Surjeet, Aditya and
7.3 ASES report production, after breakdown or 6/22/2021 Open Closed
concerned members and follow the plan to be defined Vinod
major disruption, Reaction plan: Start up, Set up,
same
Poka yoke check and First part approval

000000Confidential C
#
# Chapter 7: Shop Floor 18 Supplier Name Function Date

Open Prepared by Gaurav QMS - Incharge 21.09.2020

Close Approved by Mahesh Kumar C Plant Head 21.09.2020

Requirement from RNTBCI (From

Question Date Phenomenon Actions from supplier Pilot Target Date Actual Date Status Internal status
ASES report)

Set up matrix to be prepared

Set up matrix to be prepared with respect to
with respect to different models
different models which includes Die / tool/
which includes Die / tool/ Child Gaurav, Surjeet, Aditya and
7.3 11.06.21 Child parts details/ Process Parameter/ Set up matrix to be prepared 6/22/2021 Open Closed
parts details/ Process Parameter/ Vinod
program selection, etc. in Stamping &
program selection, etc. in
Welding process
Stamping & Welding process
Tea/Lunch break rule to to
No rule displayed for tea / Lunch break- Gaurav, Surjeet, Aditya and
7.6 11.06.21 prepare and to be displayed In Rule to be displayed 6/22/2021 Open Closed
before leaving finish the part Vinod
respective departments
Define the lighting level (lux)
Lighting requirement (Lux level) is not defined and requirement at WIP / FG inspection
LUX level to be defined and Gaurav, Surjeet, Aditya and
7.7 ASES report monitored at work in progress and finished parts station. Monitor the same periodically 6/22/2021 Open Closed
monitored Vinod
inspection area. and record the
Final inspection standard is not inline to control plan results.
(some checkpoints are missing). Ex. Checkpoint: Revisit the final inspection standard Gaurav, Surjeet, Aditya and
7.7 ASES report Final inspection standard to revised 6/22/2021 Open
Forming crack, Bush crack according to control plan. Vinod
etc.,
Modify the final inspection standard
Final inspection standard is not in detail with Detailed final inspection standard to Gaurav, Surjeet, Aditya and
7.7 ASES report to make in detail with clear inspection 6/22/2021 Open
inspection steps, photo, part positioning etc., be prepared Vinod
steps, photos, part positioning etc.,
Educate the inspectors to follow the
Some of the checkpoints are not checked during final
final inspection standard strictly.
inspection according to control plan. Ex. Checkpoint: Final inspection to be inline with Gaurav, Surjeet, Aditya and
7.7 ASES report Ensure their conformance to the 7/1/2021 Open
Forming crack, Bush control plan Vinod
standard through
crack etc.,
Inspector observation
Add missing photos / samples with
Photo / sample with validity is not available for some Photo/ limit sample to be developed Gaurav, Surjeet, Aditya and
7.7 ASES report validity or defects and display at 7/1/2021 Open
defects. Ex. Defect - Forming crack. for each defect Vinod
respective location
Some reaction rule like root cause analysis and
Reaction Rule to be defined incase of Reaction rules to be defined for not ok Gaurav, Surjeet, Aditya and
7.7 ASES report actions incase of Inspection equipment is NOK is not 7/1/2021 Open Closed
Inspection equipment is NOK. equipments Vinod
defined
NC handling procedure is not displayed at Shopfloor.
Display the NC handling procedure at
which includes marking of defect location, put in the NC handling procedure to be Gaurav, Surjeet, Aditya and
7.10 ASES report Shopfloor (easy access to Operators 7/1/2021 Open Closed
red bin, record in register immediately , end of the displayed on the shopfloor. Vinod
and Inspectors).
shift tally the rej qty with register
Add feedback to cause process in the
Feedback to cause process is not defined & followed NC handling procedure with criteria. Feedback to cause process to be Gaurav, Surjeet, Aditya and
7.10 ASES report 7/1/2021 Open
incase of continuous rejection or major rejection Define and follow the feedback defined Vinod
record.
Defect parts are not marked and not recorded
Educate the Operators / Inspectors to
immediately by category of defects. Ex. Process: Defect parts to be marked and
7.10 ASES report mark the defective parts according to Surjeet, Aditya and Vinod 7/1/2021 Open Closed
Riveting, Part: Side Door Hinge recorded
the procedure.
Female, Defect: Plating dull, Quantity: 1 no
Define the rejection parts disposal
Disposal of defective parts from red box is not frequency and follow the same.
followed periodically. Cross checking is not Perform the cross checking at shift Disposal to defective part at the end
7.10 ASES report Surjeet, Aditya and Vinod 7/1/2021 Open Closed
performed at end of the shift against end for actual of the shidt to be ensured
actual quantity in red box and recorded quantity. quantity in red box against recorded
quantity.

000000Confidential C
#
# Chapter 7: Shop Floor 18 Supplier Name Function Date

Open Prepared by Gaurav QMS - Incharge 21.09.2020

Close Approved by Mahesh Kumar C Plant Head 21.09.2020

Requirement from RNTBCI (From

Question Date Phenomenon Actions from supplier Pilot Target Date Actual Date Status Internal status
ASES report)

Rework decision matrix is not defined for process

wise defects. Ex. Part: Door hinge rear upper YP8, Modify the rework decision matrix
Rework decision matrix ti be defined Gaurav, Surjeet, Aditya and
7.11 ASES report Process: Bush fitment Male + for process wise defects according to 7/1/2021 Open Closed
as per control plan Vinod
Bush, Defect: Bush improper fitment, Gap between control plan
male & bush, loose after fitment etc.,
Rework instruction is not defined for some
reworkable defects. Ex. Ex. Part: Door hinge rear
Prepare the rework instruction for Rework instruction to be defined for Gaurav, Surjeet, Aditya and
7.11 ASES report upper YP8, Process: Bush fitment Male 7/1/2021 Open Closed
missing reworkable defects all reworkable defects Vinod
+ Bush, Defect: Bush improper fitment, Gap between
male & bush, loose after fitment etc.,

Rework record is not followed always for all kind of Educate the concerned members to
Rework record to be prepared for all Gaurav, Surjeet, Aditya and
7.11 ASES report rework. Ex. Process: Bush fitment line, Rework: record the rework details when 7/1/2021 Open Closed
kind of reowrk Vinod
Bush improper fitment. rework performed

Some key informations are not captured in the rework

Modify the rework record to capture Gaurav, Surjeet, Aditya and
7.11 ASES report record. Ex. Rework operator name, rework OK Rework record to be updated 7/1/2021 Open Closed
missing key information. Vinod
quantity etc.,
Rule and record for reinspection of reworked parts is
Define the rule for reinspection of Define the rule for reinspection of Gaurav, Surjeet, Aditya and
7.11 ASES report not available. Ex. Process: Stamping, Reworkable 7/1/2021 Open Closed
reworked stamping parts reworked stamping parts Vinod
Defect: Burr.
Define the reworked part
Rework part identification is not defined and Rework part identification to be Gaurav, Surjeet, Aditya and
7.11 ASES report identification rule and follow the 7/1/2021 Open Closed
followed. defined Vinod
same
Skill matrix for rework operation is not exist. Ex. Prepare and display the skill matrix Skill matrix to be prepared for rework Gaurav, Surjeet, Aditya and
7.11 ASES report 7/1/2021 Open Closed
Process: Stamping, Rework: Burr. for rework operators. process Vinod
Some unusual situations related to Equipment and
Add missing unusual situation into
Part is not defined. Ex. Unknown defect, Defect in Abnormality handling rules to be Gaurav, Surjeet, Aditya and
7.12 ASES report the procedure with appropriate 7/1/2021 Open Closed
new location, Spike rejections updated Vinod
reaction rule
etc.,
Unusual situation handling procedure is not known to Educate the concerned members on Gaurav, Surjeet, Aditya and
7.12 ASES report Training to be provided 7/8/2021 Open Closed
concerned members at shopfloor. unusual situation handling procedure Vinod
Fallen parts check details and disposal status are not
Record the fallen part quality check Check details and disposal status to be Gaurav, Surjeet, Aditya and
7.12 ASES report recorded. Ex. Part: Arm R00, Date: 15-07-2020, Qty 7/8/2021 Open Closed
details and disposal status recorded for fallen parts Vinod
3 nos.
Follow the unusual situation handling
Unusual situations other than Fallen part is not procedure and record retroactive Abnormal situation handling rules to
7.12 ASES report Surjeet, Aditya and Vinod 7/8/2021 Open Closed
recorded with retroactive, cause and action details confirmation details, analysis, actions be followed
Poka Yoke failure retroactive
and restart
confirmation to be defined in the
Poka Yoke failure retroactive confirmation Retroactive conformation to be
procedure. Ex: Checking of
7.12' 17.04.21 not clearly defined in the abnormmal situation clealy defined for POKA YOKE Surjeet, Aditya and Vinod 7/8/2021 Open Closed
parts in next station, FG, If
procedure failire
required transit & Customer
end,.
PM is not done as per plan for some machines. No Conduct the PM according to the
deviation approval from QA and reschedule plan is plan. Incase of any delay, make PM to be done as per plan, where
7.17 ASES report available for delayed PM. Ex. reschedule and follow additional schedule is delayed deviation Ramesh Yadav 7/8/2021 Open
Press PWM 26: Frequency is 6 months once, Due on: check to avoid quality approval is required
06/20 - 2nd Week issues.

000000Confidential C
#
# Chapter 7: Shop Floor 18 Supplier Name Function Date

Open Prepared by Gaurav QMS - Incharge 21.09.2020

Close Approved by Mahesh Kumar C Plant Head 21.09.2020

Requirement from RNTBCI (From

Question Date Phenomenon Actions from supplier Pilot Target Date Actual Date Status Internal status
ASES report)
Define target for maintenance KPI's
like MTBF, MTTR etc., based on past
No target for maintenance KPI is defined. Ex. MTBF, data. Monitor the monthly results and
7.17 ASES report KPI targets to be defined Ramesh Yadav 7/8/2021 Open
MTTR etc. initiate the
correction actions incase of
Prepare general spare list with non
achievement
minimum stock of target.
level, reorder qty and
General spare list and its stock level monitoring is not General spare list stock monitoring to
7.17 ASES report lead time. Monitor the spares IN and Ramesh Yadav 7/8/2021 Open
available for Machines be done
OUT to manage
Prepare
the general spare list with
availability.
Life for consuming tools / spares is not defined and
minimum stock level, reorder qty and
monitored. Ex. Die coating life, Piercing punch life, Consumable tool life to be defined
7.17 ASES report lead time. Monitor the spares IN and Surjeet, Aditya and Vinod 7/8/2021 Open
Projection welding electrode and monitored
OUT to manage
life etc.
the availability.
4M change display board to be
4M change display not available in shop floor. Ex:
8.1 ASES report displayed in shop floor. Ex: Assy, 4M change display to be made Surjeet, Aditya and Vinod 7/8/2021 Open
Assy, Stamping, Welding, etc.
Stamping, Welding, etc.

Open 39

Close 0

Total 39

% Action
0%
Implemented

000000Confidential C
#
# Chapter 8: Change Management 5 Supplier Name Function Date

Open Prepared by Gaurav QMS - Incharge 21.09.2020

Close Approved by Mahesh Kumar C Plant Head 21.09.2020

Question ASES report Phenomenon Requirement from RNTBCI (From ASES report) Actions from supplier Pilot Target Date Actual Date Status Internal Status

Countermeasure and responsibility defined in 4M change matrix is inadequate.

8.1 ASES report Ex. Man: Operator change, Countermeasure like Job Revisit 4M change matrix to add appropriate countermeasure and responsibility for each 4M change. 4M Change Matrix to be revised wrt reaction rule. Gaurav 6/23/2021 Open Closed
observation, additional inspection is not addressed

Some CFT members are not communicated for 4M change. Members to be

Gaurav, Aditya, Surjeet &
8.1 ASES report communicated for each 4M change is not clear and no Define the rule to communicate the appropriate members for 4M change. Keep the record for communication Rules for communication to be defined and record to be kept 6/23/2021 Open Closed
Vinod
communication evidence available.

There is no special identification for 4M change affected lot to provide special Gaurav, Aditya, Surjeet &
8.1 ASES report Define and follow the identification method for 4M change affected lot. Special identification for 4M change effected lot to be done 6/23/2021 Open Closed
attention till part delivery. Vinod

Countermeasures are not followed according to the standard during 4M change

adoption.
8.1 ASES report Ex. Case1: Job observation, additional inspection for new operator deployment at Educate the concerned members to respect the 4M change standard rule for each 4M change adoption Countermeasures to be followed Aditya, Surjeet & Vinod 6/23/2021 Open Closed
Reaming process on 20-07-2020.
Case 2: Retroactive, restart up for EOL machine breakdown on 20.07.2020.

Some process changes are not captured in the change definition. Ex. Packaging,
8.2 ASES report Add missing process changes into process change definition. (Refer ANPQP guideline). Missing changes to be added in process change defination Gaurav 6/23/2021 Open
logistics changes, machine deletion etc.,

Change request, Feasibility study, Risk analysis and Activity timing plan is not Educate the concerned members to follow change request, feasibility study, risk analysis and activity timing plan according to
8.2 ASES report Documented to be prepared as per process for process change Sanjeev / Irshad 6/29/2021 Open
available for assessed change. procedure.

Trial report, Before / after comparison interms of quality and productivity is not Perform trial part inspection, before / after comparison for process capability, rejection ratio, change intend, cycle time etc.,
8.2 ASES report Backup data of trail report and before / after comparision to be prepared Sanjeev / Irshad 6/29/2021 Open
available for assessed change. according to the procedure and keep the record

Internal PSW approval or similar and change implementation cut off is not Obtain the internal approval according to 4M change approval criteria and keep the record of change implementation cut off
8.2 ASES report Internal approval to be taken and implementation cutooff to be defined Sanjeev / Irshad 6/29/2021 Open
available for assessed change. details.

Progress of change status is not monitored through change tracking sheet. Case
2: Timer/buzzer controller to be added in pre-treatment process to avoid the
8.2 ASES report Add each 4M change into change tracking sheet to monitor the status of each steps. Process change tracking sheet to be prepared Sanjeev / Irshad 7/5/2021 Open
manual control., Complete Auto control line to be
install for PT line, Pedal Set Brake, YCA, action date: 20-02-2020.

Change request, Feasibility study, Risk analysis and Activity timing plan is not Educate the concerned members to follow change request, feasibility study, risk analysis and activity timing plan according to
8.3 ASES report Documented to be prepared as per process for design change Anil (design) 7/5/2021 Open
evidenced for any design change. procedure. Implemebt the same for latest changes.

Trial report, Before / after comparison interms of quality and productivity is not Perform trial part inspection, before / after comparison for process capability, rejection ratio, change intend, cycle time
8.3 ASES report Backup data of trail report and before / after comparision to be prepared Anil (design) 7/5/2021 Open
presented for any design change. etc., according to the procedure and keep the record.

8.3 ASES report Change approval (Customer PSW) is not presented for any design change Change approval (Customer PSW) evidenced to be recollected & stored. customer approval to be taken Anil (design) 7/5/2021 Open

8.3 ASES report Design change progress tracking sheet is not presented for any design change. Obtain the internal / Customer approval and keep the record of change implementation cut off details. Design change tracking sheet to be prepared Anil (design) 7/5/2021 Open

Add each 4M change into change tracking sheet to monitor the status of each
8.3 ASES report Add each product change into change tracking sheet to monitor the status of each steps. 4M change tracking sheet Aditya, Surjeet & Vinod 7/5/2021 Open
steps

Open 14

Close 0

Total 14

000000Confidential C
#
# Chapter 8: Change Management 5 Supplier Name Function Date

Open Prepared by Gaurav QMS - Incharge 21.09.2020

Close Approved by Mahesh Kumar C Plant Head 21.09.2020

Question ASES report Phenomenon Requirement from RNTBCI (From ASES report) Actions from supplier Pilot Target Date Actual Date Status Internal Status

% Action Implemented 0%

000000Confidential C
#
# Chapter 9: Sub-suppliers management 3 Supplier Name Function Date

Open Prepared by Gaurav QMS - Incharge 21.09.2020

Close Approved by Mahesh Kumar C Plant Head 21.09.2020

Question Phenomenon Requirement from RNTBCI (From ASES report) Actions from supplier Pilot Target Date Actual Date Status

Timeline for some key activities is not addressed in the sub supplier quality
9.4 ASES report concerns handling procedure. Ex. Sub supplier Define timeline for each activities involved for sub supplier quality concerns handling. Timelines to be defined in procedure Gaurav 6/17/2021 Open
communication for quality issues, Containment actions etc.,

Some appearance related defects (<100PPM in Sheet metal and <500PPM in

9.4 ASES report Plating parts) are not communicated to sub supplier Communicate the sub supplier for all quality issues within 24 hours to implement necessary actions to avoid recurrence. Sub Supplier quality Concern procedure to be revised for handling the sub-supplier concerns. Gaurav 6/17/2021 Open
for cause analysis and correction action.

8D report or similar (root cause analysis / action plan) is not available for some
sub supplier concerns reported from Assembly shop.
9.4 ASES report Receive and validate the 8D or similar for all sub supplier concerns to ensure robust actions implementation 8D report to be taken for all sub supplier issues Dalbir 6/17/2021 Open
Ex. Part: ARM hood hinge, Defect: Dimension NG 9.2 +/-0.5mm, actual:
10.5mm, Qty: 200 nos. Month: Mar20.

Root cause analysis is not done using Quality tools like Ishikawa, Cause
verification / validation, Why why analysis etc., Ex.Part: Educate the sub supplier to conduct depth root case analysis using Brainstorming, Ishikawa, Cause validation /
9.4 ASES report Proper analysis to be for done by suppliers Dalbir 7/6/2021 Open
Tube 12x0.75x675mm, Concern: Crack, Supplier: Technico strips & tubes, verification or similar method to find out root causes and initiate concrete countermeasure.
Defect date: 07-07-2020, Qty: 50 nos.

QPIS Monitoring sheet not in detail Main 8D steps status are like containment
QPIS monitoring sheet to be revised considering input as Tartget Vs actual for containment, action plan
9.4 ASES report actions, action plan receipt, action implementation etc Add missing key 8D steps into QPIS Monitoring sheet with timeline to track the status. Dalbir 7/6/2021 Open
receiot, action implementation etc.
is not captured.

8D progress is not monitored through tracking sheet for some sub supplier
9.4 ASES report concerns. Ex. Part: ARM hood hinge, Defect: Dimension Add all sub supplier concerns into QPIS monitoring sheet and monitor the status of 8D steps closure as per time line All the concerns to be adedd in tracking sheet Dalbir 7/6/2021 Open
NG 9.2 +/-0.5mm, actual: 10.5mm, Qty: 200 nos. Month: Mar20.

Open 6

Close 0

Total 6

% Action Implemented 0%

000000Confidential C
#