EDUC-612 (CALCULUS FOR MATHEMATICS TEACHERS)

2nd Trimester, Academic Year 2021- 2022

EVALUATION AND RATING GUIDE

For the Group-Related Work
Ratee from Group No.

Legend:
4 points -> when the item was fully observable from the group’s output
3 points -> when the item was moderately observable from the group’s output
2 points -> when the item was fairly observable from the group’s output
1 point -> when the item was poorly or not observable from the group’s output

PART-1 Points
Item INTRODUCTION (10%) 4 3 2 1
1 It let the readers know what they expect from such notes.
2 It attracts the readers’ attention as it was written with a “hook” that grabs their
interest.
3 It opens with a general overview of the assigned unit, chapter, or lesson(s).
4 It briefly fill in some essential details for the learner-readers to reflect on.
5 It points out what the learner-readers may expect from a chapter or lesson(s) to
used for.
6 Other salient matters that are vital to such unit, chapter or lessons have been
considered by the group in writing this part.
SUM

PART-2 Points
Item LEARNING OUTCOMES (5%) 4 3 2 1
1 The behavioral verbs being used have satisfied the SMART principle (Specific,
Measureable, Attainable, Realistic, and Time-bounded)
2 The domains on knowledge, skills, and attitude/values have been well-taken during
the crafting of such learning outcomes.
SUM 6

PART-3 Points
Item PRETEST AND POSTTEST (10%) 4 3 2 1
1 The prepared pretest has initially determined the level of proficiency of each
student/group.
2 The pretest has gauged the degree to which the students or groups meet
expectations using prior knowledge.
3 At least 3-5 items for such pre-assessment have been provided.
4 The group has fully complied the instruction that a teacher-made pretest for this
work is not encouraged. Hence, all of the items were takeb from various references
(e.g. books, compilations, modules, or internet-reliable sources)
5 The pretest has guaranteed that such preliminary appraisal shall include majority, if
not all, of the possible lessons in this unit/chapter.
SUM
 PART-4 Points
Item CONTENT INPUTS AND DISCUSSIONS (65%) 4 3 2 1
1
2 Writing the contents has considered an appropriately-identified number of pages
which serves the underlying objective in the engagement on this graduate teacher
education–for mastery of knowledge and skills-honing sake of the students.
3 Discussion of the intended curriculum contents (i.e. subject matters or lessons)
must be made worth reading, interesting, informative, engaging, motivating, etc.
4 Inputs have been written to respond the need of being a graduate studies student
who needs to upgrade/advance one’s knowledge & competencies of the lessons).
5 Inputs have been written to be equally responsive to the need of being a
knowledge-facilitator to either the junior/senior/tertiarylevel students.
6 Illustrative examples are definitely vital and necessitated; hence, the group has
indeed included the same in the prentation or discussions of the lessons.
7 In writing the fragments, phrases, statements, and paragraphs, the group has
avoided to “cut and paste” any of these mentioned English structures.
8 It was very apparent that the group did cite the author(s) of a particular fragment,
phrase, or statement upon its adoption (in compliance of Item-7).
9 Used of an “End-Note” in citing a particular statement(s) that is not your own at the
part of the Content Inputs and Discussions has been fully made by the group as
required.
SUM

PART-5 Points
Item REINFORCEMENT ACTIVITY (5%) 4 3 2 1
1 The group has clearly provided a reinforcement activity for the students to further
read and study using either books, compilations, modules, internet-reliable sources
or other learning materials as possible reference.
2 A reinforcement activity has been embedded by the group in this part to allow the
students to further study and/or work (e.g. assignment, homework, or expanded
activity like critiquing a research article, crafting slide presentation, etc.)
SUM

PART-6 Points
Item REFERENCES (5%) 4 3 2 1
1 The group has cited the reference(s) being used at the part on “Content Inputs and
Discussions” such as those from the published books with ISBN#, workbooks,
compilations, modules/manuals with ISSN#, and other reliable and valid sources.
2 Books/authors to be cited may consider between these publication years 2000–
2020 (i.e. under this new normal, the probable usage of the internet sources is so
permitted using the url as basis).
3 In writing the references, the group has fully followed the APA-format for any type
of citations.
SUM

Rated by:

Name of the Rater (i.e. Group Leader) with e-signature

Group Number