Professional Documents
Culture Documents
- Introduction:
1. What is the study all about (1-2 paragraphs)
2. What other authors say about the topic? (2 or more paragraphs)
3. What is the gap in knowledge (missing link/unknown)? (1-2 paragraphs)
4. How do you plan to address the gap (state your main rationale or purpose in this
part)? (1-2 paragraphs)
- Theoretical Background:
➢ Look for a theory that relates with the concept of the study
✓ Preferably a theory specific to the profession
✓ Can be borrowed theories for as long as the concepts are related
➢ Discuss the what the theory is all about
➢ Discuss how the theory, specifically its variables, are related to the variables or concepts
of the current study at hand
➢ Create a schematic diagram of the framework (variables in theory WITH the variables of
your present study). A box for recommendation is placed at the last/bottom part of the
schematic diagram
➢ The schematic diagram should be placed on a separate page, without any discussion
- The Problem:
Statement of the problem:
❖ Make a general problem statement (major problem)
❖ Usually reiterates the title and includes four important parts:
1. P- Purpose (what do you plan to study)
2. L- Location (where will you get your data)
3. O- Object (who are involved in the study)
4. T- Time frame (what is the time scope of your study)
❖ This is stated in declarative form
Sub-problems (Research questions)
❖ These are the specific questions of the study
❖ Stated interrogatively and should be related to the main problem
❖ Avoid questions on profiling—go directly to main points or problems
❖ Categories (or sub-variables) should be numbered as 1.1, 2.1, etc.
- Statement of Hypothesis:
➢ Make use of null hypothesis (represented by Ho)
➢ Can be used only for quantitative studies that predicts relationship (comparative and
correlational studies) and not for survey type topics
➢ One hypothesis is required for every sub-problem that denotes relationship (either
comparative or correlation)
-Related Literatures:
❖ These are taken from books, articles, encyclopedia, periodicals and other reference
materials (except research journals, thesis, and dissertations)
❖ Read the entire article then rewrite the review using your own words if possible. This
should not compromise the meaning of the original statements or article.
❖ Use references and citations within the last five years (most preferable) or those from
year 2000 and beyond (less preferable but still acceptable)
❖ Use both local and foreign reference articles.
❖ Take note of the following for your reference guide:
✓ Article title
✓ Author’s name
✓ Page number
✓ Name of the book
✓ Year the article was written
✓ Year the book was published (see cover)
✓ Edition number of the book
✓ Publishing press (with country)
✓ URL for internet references
✓ Date when internet references were retrieved
❖ Arrange related literatures by variable or topically. For every topical presentation,
arrange the articles in chronological order from the most current to the past.
-Related Studies:
❖ These are taken from research journals, theses and dissertations (either published or
unpublished)
❖ The reference should be related to the current study in terms of the:
✓ Study objectives
✓ Participants involved
✓ Methods (or designs) used
✓ General findings
✓ Conclusion
❖ Do not copy the whole study. Include only the five (5) important parts mentioned above
❖ Use both local and foreign reference articles
❖ Take note of the following:
✓ Name/s of the authors (enumerate even if they are too numerous)
✓ Title of the study
✓ Name of the journal or book (or any) where the study was published
✓ Year when the study was conducted
✓ Year when the study was published
✓ Publishing press and country of publisher
✓ Volume number; issue number; page number of reference
✓ URL for internet references
✓ Date when the internet references were retrieved
❖ Use references and citations within the last five years (most preferable) or those from
year 2000 and beyond (less preferable but still acceptable)
❖ Arrange related literatures by variable or topically. For every topical presentation,
arrange the articles in chronological order from the most current to the past.
General guidelines for citations (IN-TEXT CITATIONS):
For one author only:
a. Serad (2010) stated that…….----if the statement comes after the author
b. Research is a vital component…….(Serad, 2010)---if the author comes after the
statement. The period should be after the close parenthesis.
For two authors:
a. Serad and Tan (2010) stated that……
b. Research is a vital component of education and …….. (Serad & Tan, 2010).
For 3-6 authors (first occurrence):
a. Serad, Tan, and Lim (2010) stated that …………..
b. Research is life and it is the …….. (Serad, Tan, ……., & Lim, 2010).
For 3-6 authors (subsequent occurrence)
a. Serad, et. al. (2010) further stated that….
b. It is strictly practiced in the country (Serad, et. al., 2010).
For 7 or more authors (first and subsequent occurrences)
a. Serad, et. al. (2010) stated that…..
b. Divorce is strictly prohibited (Serad, et. al., 2010)
-Design:
➢ This is method used in the study.
➢ Common designs are the following:
o For quantitative studies:
- Descriptive Correlational
- Descriptive Comparative
- Experimental
- Quasi-experimental
- Survey designs and evaluations
❖ Discuss the research design or method of choice
❖ Discuss how the design will be applied in the current study
- Environment:
❖ Presents the setting where the study will be conducted and include a deeper description
of such setting
❖ Include discussion on mission-vision; history; practices; services; people among others
❖ May provide a schematic diagram to be appended at the back of the study
- Participants:
❖ Present who will be involved in the study from whom you will acquire your data
❖ Describe the participants
❖ How many participants are involved? How is the number computed or determined? And
how are they selected (discuss sampling technique that will be used)?
Sampling Techniques:
NON-PROBABILITY/NON-RANDOM SAMPLING:
1. Convenience Sampling- accidental or based on available respondents.
2. Snowball Sampling- based on referral or networking.
3. Consecutive Sampling- based on time lapse or time frame.
4. Purposive Sampling- based on specified set of criteria.
5. Quota Sampling- based in a target or computed number or size.
6. Self-Selection- based on whoever a unit or group or organization wish to send as
participants.
- Instrument:
❖ Discuss what research tool will be used
❖ If it is a questionnaire (for survey purposes), discuss where it was taken or where it was
based. Discuss also how the questionnaire is formulated
❖ How will the items in the questionnaire be answered or scored?
❖ What validation methods are used to validate the questionnaire?
Validation by Experts: Instrument is checked by at least three experts on the subject
matter/ field of discipline on face validation/content validation/criterion validation
❖ For qualitative studies, use a scheduled interview guide.
❖ Discuss what are the bases for the questions in the interview guide
❖ Discuss how the questions in the interview guide will be asked for every participant
❖ NOTE: Please formulate your questionnaire before the design hearing and bring it to the
panel for evaluation and revision during the design hearing.
-Data Analysis:
❖ This will depend on the types of data to be collected and the nature of the problem
❖ The Center for Research and Development will help you out on this. While doing
your paper for proposal (design hearing), you may send me a copy of your complete
manuscript including your questionnaire at joelserad@gmail.com so that I can help
you decide what statistical treatment to use.
❖ For qualitative studies, you may also do the same (send me a copy of your
manuscript) so that I can help you decide what qualitative data analysis method will
be used for your study.
Ethical Considerations…
______________________________________________________________________________
PRESENTATION OF DATA:
- Data can be presented using tables, graphs, or other figures.
- An introductory paragraph should be written before data is presented.
- Tables should be clear and complete. Factor means should be provided in needed.
- No vertical lines. Only top, 2nd, and bottom horizontal lines.
ANALYSIS OF DATA:
- This is the objective analysis of data.
- Data should be explained and discussed based on its context.
INTERPRETATION OF DATA:
- This is the subjective explanation of the data.
- Data should be discussed based on what the researcher thinks about the findings,
meaning, it can be opinionated and based on researcher’s perception.
- Implication of the findings should also be written on this part.
_____________________________________________________________________________
CHAPTER 5: SUMMARY of FINDINGS, CONCLUSION, RECOMMENDATIONS
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS:
- This provides a summary of the results and presented by variable or problem.
- This is presented in paragraph form per variable or problem.
- Figures or numbers should not anymore reflect in this portion.
CONCLUSION:
- This is the generalization of the findings of the study.
- The researcher transcends the findings into one general statement.
- The conclusion is then related to the theory if it supports or negates the latter.
- Note: Do not repeat the findings in this part.
RECOMMENDATION:
- This provides the researcher’s proposals or suggestions based on the findings.
- Recommendations are “should” statements and indicate the need to do something
based on the findings of the study.
- This targets the findings that need attention or are low or weak.
______________________________________________________________________________
REFERENCES
APPENDICES
CURRICULUM VITAE