Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Contents: This section introduces the term Flood Resilience and Flood Resilience
Management and gives an overview of their main aspects. It also gives a comparison
to the traditional Flood (Resistance) Management measures.
Flood Management-overview
In order to define the resilience, we are coming to the definition of RISK. The risk is
defined as the probability or as a hazard that occurs and that creates a certain loss.
Or:
Figure 3 ResilienceVSResistance
In the last years many countries have released a new water policy to cope with
floods, e.g. (LAWA 1995, BMU 2004, IRMA 2003). Instead of fighting floods it gives
preference to strategies of living with floods which covers all measures of flood risk
management by which the negative impact of flood is minimized. This change of
paradigm is essential to find the optimal solution to flood problem nowadays.
These measures can be subdivided into four main groups:
• land use control
• risk awareness
• flood preparedness
• financial preparedness
Building codes and standards regulate the design, construction, use of building
materials and maintenance of buildings in order to protect the users of a
building.Building codes set the minimum acceptable requirements necessary for
protecting people and their properties.
I) Spatial Planning
Flood risk adapted land use
Land Use Control Public Responsiblity
II) Building regulations
Building codes
zoning ordinances
I) Information:
Inundation maps
Public and Private
Risk Awareness Risk maps
Responsibility
II) Education
Learning Groups
Brochures
Financial
Obligatory insurance Private Responsibility
Preparedness
Private insurance of the
remaining risk
As it has already been shortly induced, integrative approach is the key word for
deciding on flood resilience measures.
For example, without land use control and risk awareness the efficiency of flood
preparedness will be limited. Without risk awareness the readiness of stakeholders to
invest in an improved flood resistance of their building is limited. Inconsistent land
use can lead to inefficiency of flood preparedness or higher investments to
accomplish flood resistance of the building.
In England even a Kitemarking institution for approving techniques and materials of
flood resilience has been established. In Germany many Governmental agencies and
municipalities have delivered brochures to the stakeholders in which they inform
about the risks of flood and possibilities to adapt their buildings to flood. However
little is known about the efficiency of those measures either for individual properties
or groups and total urban districts of communities. On this basis the benefit of flood
resilience can not be evaluated in an economic way. The economic soundness of
flood resilience compared to alternative flood defence concepts (e.g. conventional
methods of defence by dikes and walls) can not be proved and stakeholders have
difficulties to realize the payback and limits of their investments. Thus the Technical
University of Hamburg, Germany has carried out an investigation in which the
observed damages have been analysed in 9 communities along the river Rhine,
Elbe, Danube and their tributaries with the objective to quantify the damage due to
insufficient flood resilience. The work was done by order of the International
Commission for the Protection of the River Rhine (ICPR) which published some of
the results in (IKSR, 2003). For the first time it could be quantified in what way flood
awareness influences the construction of the fabric and interior of buildings and what
damage can be reduced by different measures of flood resistance at buildings.
In order to get better overview of the main characteristics of resistance and resilience
strategies, a short summary is given in Table 2.
Table 2: Comparison between Resistance and Resilience Strategies
Resistance strategies Resilience strategies
One design discharge is applied for the whole
Focus on reducing the impact of floods by
area, implying that all land use types (e.g.
"living with floods" instead of "fighting
cities, agricultural areas and nature reserves)
floods", as in the traditional strategy. They
have the same probability of flooding.
aim at giving room to the floods but with
Applying one safety level also means that it is
concurrent impact minimalization.
unknown which area will be flooded.
Little attention is given to the consequences
of possible floods. As a result of economic
development, the potential flood damage has Consider measures to reduce the impacts of
increased significantly. The resistance flooding, such as the design of warning
strategy creates a false sense of safety which systems and evacuation plans and the
explains why large investments are still being application of spatial planning and building
made in the area. As a consequence, the regulations.
economic value at risk of flooding still
increases steadily
It causes an endless need for raising and
improving the water defence structures, thus May also include measures to accelerate the
restricting the natural dynamics of a river recovery after a flood, such as damage
system and spoiling landscape qualities such compensation regulations and insurances
as cultural heritage and scenery.