1.

The speaker wants to imply the ethical principles and the matters pertaining to practically
the beginning up to the end of life for this matter. The students and all people in general
should maintain ethical principles that will serve as a guide for them to make the right
decision. To elaborate all these, the standard that we must follow is called the Natural
Moral Law.
2. Euthanasia > in other words, this is called mercy killing. This is basically eliminating
the sufferer to eliminate the suffering. The speaker does not agree with this because this
is like killing in general. Instead, they practice palliative care. This is to eliminate the
suffering so that they do not need to eliminate the sufferer.

Abortion > abortion is a sin not just to us but also to our creator. the speaker states that
when a woman is raped, she is not the only victim but the child also. When the mother
considers abortion, ultimately, the one who will suffer the death penalty is the innocent
child. So, it is a lie if a doctor proposes abortion to a portion who has been raped in fact,
the trauma will be doubled. No matter how brave a front a woman puts up, she will never
be the same again after abortion. It does not assure women that abortion is pro-women
because it destroys their lives.

Contraceptives > justification of fact to somehow pacify the conscience of conception

that is why it leads to implantation. It is a battle between pro-life and pro-choice. But
there is no such thing as pro-choice because there is only life and death. Being pregnant,
you cannot just say that it is your body because you have another living thing inside you.

3. She used her own knowledge and experiences to further come up with a conclusion about
practicing basic human rights because in the end, it is knowing more about the principles
but more than just knowing is really reflecting on them. It is a dialogue for oneself. She
states about situational ethics being important, but you need to keep it as a secondary
measurement because it is not the main norm of morality. The speaker also states that we
still must ask for life to be able to remove all our biases and own feelings into the matter
we tend to rush ourselves into a decision that will just complicate matters.
4. I believe, none. The speaker already explained everything in a step-by-step solution, and
she has already provided some relative arguments that will make us think before we act.
Her claims are efficient for me because generally, ethics is not just a practice. It is also
our responsibility. It is compelling because she used her own experiences to explain the
topic briefly that is why she has been able to execute her arguments perfectly.