You are on page 1of 1

HISTORY AS THE SUBJECTIVE

PROCESS OF RE-CREATION 

From the incomplete evidence, historians strive to restore the total past of

mankind. They do it from the point of view that human beings live in different times and

that their experiences maybe somehow comparable, or that their experiences may have

significantly differed contingent on the place and time. For the historian, history

becomes only that part of the human past which can be meaningfully reconstructed

from the available records and from inferences regarding their setting. 

In short, the historian's aim is verisimilitude (the truth, authenticity, plausibility)

about a past. Unlike the study of the natural science that has objectively measurable

phenomena, the study of history is a subjective process as documents and relics are

scattered and do not together comprise the total object that the historian is studying.

Some of the natural scientists, such as geologists and paleo-zoologists who study

fossils from the traces of a perished past, greatly resemble historians in this regard, but

they differ at certain points since historians deal with human testimonies as well as

physical traces. 

You might also like