REFERENCES

Abdullah, A. M. 2011. Individual and technological factors effecting perceived ease of

use of web-based learning technologies in a developing country. Elec. J. Inf. Sys.
Dev. Count. 6:146-158
Adunola, 2011. Smart board made teaching more visual and learning more interactive in

turn encouraging greater participation from students improving their motivation.

J. Edu. Res. 1:23-76.

Agnihotri, R. K. 2014. The role of s, 11: 3, 364-379.elf determination theory in

explaining teachers motivation to continue to use On-line learning. Int. J. Com.
Edu. 54: 1177-1187.
Ahmad, K. 2009. An Analysis of young people's use of and attitudes towards smart

boards . J. Telem. Infor. 2 :349-364.

Ahmad. M., T. M. Khan. 2012. Investigating students perceived satisfaction , behavioral

intention and effectiveness of on-line learning: A case study of the Blackboard
System. 10:35-46.
Akhtar, K., L. Ebi., M. Hauengue., R.S. Kovats., B. Revich and A. Woodward. 2007.
Impacts, adaptation of electronic learning tools, contribution of working group II
to the fourth, assesssment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate
change. J. Uk. Camb. Uni. Press. 2:112-134.
Aleman,E.H. 2011. Teachers opinion survey on the use of ICT tools to support

attendance based teaching. J. Comp. Edu. 5:911-915.

Alexander, C. 2020. Proposing Core Practical for Social Studies Teacher for online
teaching. A Qualitative Content Analysis. J. Tea. Elec. 2:3.12-45.
Ali. M., A. Norhidayah., S. Jusoff., K. Ali., S. Mokhtar., T. Najah and S. Andin. 2009.
‘Gender difference in perceptions and relationships among dominants of on-line
learning acceptance. Canadian Reacher. J. Cent. Sci. Tech. 3:113-145.
Al-Qirim, M.R.2011. Critical Issue: Using Technology to Improve Students

Achievements. New York: Nor. Reg. Edu. Lab. 1: 5112-134.

Anene, G.U. 2005. Factors effecting e- collaboration technology use among management
students. J. Eco. Reach. 6:99-100.
Angelo, T. 2013. Pre-test assessment and non-graded assessment for validation of
research instrument. Ame. J. Bus. Edu. 1-54.
Angus, S. 2010. Analysis of utility and use of a web based tool for digital processing
teaching by means of a technological acceptance model. J. Hum. Com. Stud.
3:89-101.
Arasteh, W.C. 2013. Improving Online Courses: What is Interaction and Why Use It?
(Undetermined). Distance Learning, 2: 22-28.
Arbaugh, J. B. 2005. Is there an optimal design for on-line MBA courses? Academy of
Management Learning and Education, 4, 135-149.
Archer, E. 2014. Learning theory and online technologies. Open Learning. J. Ope. Dis. e-
Lea. 29: 89-92.
Aremu, A. 2002. Multi casual evaluation of online learning system and performance of
Nigerian learners. Issues and Implications for electronic devices. J. Euro. Indu.
Trai. 1:123-145.
Ashaver, S. 2011.Innovating teaching and learning practices: Key elements for

developing creative classroom in Europe. Luxembourg: Pub. Off. Euro. Uni. 1:1-

99.

Averis,V. 2005. The interactive whiteboard: A literature survey. Tech. Ped. Edu. 14, 155-

170.

Ayeni, I. 2011. Being a smart teacher in a "smart classroom" Assessing teacher

professional development for incorporating Interactive White Boards. J. Com.

Edu. 1:1-45.

Ayoo, S. J. 2002. Critical success factors for On-line learning acceptance. Confirmatory
factor model. J. Soc. Sci. and Edu. Res. 1:12-32.
Bacconi. T. 2012. Integrated smart board technology in the elementary class room
essentials. Int. J. Edu. 7:321-335.
Bailystok, E. 2001. Bilingualism in Development in online teaching.: Language, literacy
and cognition. J. Child Dev. 70: 636-644.
Ballara, M. 2009. Application report: Instructional design of a computer assisted work
related literacy program. J. Com. Bas. Edu. 1:231-245.
Barbard, J., M. Broach, S. Potter and D. Prior. 2002. The state of online learning- what
the online world needs now: Quality in on-line learning handbook. J. Edu. Res.
11:123-134.
Barnes, G.E. 2012. Why online learners drop out. J. Edu. Reach. 1:12-34.
Barron, L. 2007. Issues in distance learning. Int. J. Edu. Tel. 1: 337–365.
Bartley, S. J. and J. H. Golek. 2004. Evaluating the Cost Effectiveness of Online and
Face-to-Face Instruction. J. Edu. Tech. Soc. 7: 167–175
Bearse, C. and M. Dejong. 2008.. A constructivist approach to online training for online
teachers. J. Asyn. Lear. Net. 41: 325-340.
Beauchamp, H. J. 2008. Analysis the use of Interactive Technology to Implement

Interactive Teaching. Ass. Learn. J. Comp. 4: 61-73.

Bell, B. S. and J. E. Fedeman. 2013. On-line learning in postsecondary education. The

Future of Children. 23: 165–185.
Bennett, S., A. Bishop, A. Dalgarno, B. Waycott and G. Kennedy. 2012. Implementing
Web 2.0 technologies in higher education: A collective case study. J. Com. Edu.
59: 524–534
Bernard, A. 2002. Effects of computer based instructions on students learning of
psychophysiological. J. Child. You. Serv. 2:37-61.
Berrett, D. 2012. How flipping the classroom can improve the traditional lecture. The
Chronicle of Higher Education, 58:16-18.
Bhardwaj, A. D. 2016. Effects of connections of ability on anxiety, self efficacy and
learning in online system. Int. J. Sci. Con. 2:23-28.
Bibler, A, 2018. Ron-line learning through On-line learning : Changing conceptions of
learning through online experience. Int. Con. Edu. Exp. 31:26-47.
Bixler, B. and L. Spotts .2000. Screen design and levels of interactivity in web-based
training. J. Res. Tra. 7:65-90.
Blevins, B.M. 2009. Effects of On-line learning status on academic performance in
missouri public schools. J. Edu. Reach. 11:125-134.
Bonus, D. H. 2016. A comparative analysis of online communication performance of
public and private junior high schools in the basic Edu. Certificate in
sekondi/takoradi. Euro. J. Bas. Apli. Sci. 3:21-47.
Borgonjon, J., M. Soetaert and T. Schellens. 2010. Students perceptions about the use of
vedio games in the classroom. Int. J. Edu. 54: 490-510.
Borna , M. and K. Fouladchand. 2018. The effectiveness of instructional method with
computer on students academic engagement in EFFL. Mod. J. Lan. Teac. Met. 9:
2251-2276.
Bostjan, S., H. Marjan and P. Maja. 2007. A meta analysis of On-line learning
technology acceptance: The role of user types and On-line learning technology
types. J. Com. Hum. Beh. 27:123-156.
Bowen, W. G. 2013. Higher education in the digital age. Princeton University Press.
Bukhauser, S. and M. Bacon. 2017.Impacts of on-line learning on students knowledge,
skills and satisfaction. A systematic review and meta analysis. Int. J. Nur. Stud.
54: 282-310.
Caldas, S J. 2007. The effect of online communication on socio economic status on
individual student academic achievement. J. Amer. Edu. Res. 4:269-277.
Campbell, S. J. A. 2009. Integration of SMART boards in EFL classroom. Inter. J. Edu.

Liter. Stud. 2:20-23.

Canals, L. 2016. Collecting, transcribing, analysing and pretesting interactional data. J.

Plur. Res. 9:321-347.
Carle, J. and R. Liquanti. 2012. Issues and opportunities in strengthening large scale
assessment systems for online learning. Edu. J. Reach. 7:176-185
Carlson, S. M. and A. N. Meltzoff. 2008. The effects of computer assisted learning versus
conventional methods on the acquisition and retention of theory and skills in
students. J. Med. Com. Edu. 11: 282-297.
Castillo, J. C. 2007. Futuristic model of teacher training through comparative study of

teacher competency standard for smart board in education. A. Paci. Collab. Edu.

J. 1: 43-53.

Catherine, O. 2015. Factors contributing to the current online communication

performance of both private schools and public schools. J. Edu. Prac. 6:1-8.
Cenoz, J. 2003. Instructional design variations in internet based learning for health
profession education: a systematic review and meta analysis. J. Bil. Edu. 7:1-87.
Chambers, E. A. 2004. Girls’ academic achievement varying associations of online
communicational activities. J. Gen. Edu. 16:327-346.
Chaney E. G. 2001. Web-based instruction in a Rural High School: A Collaborative
Inquiry into Its Effectiveness and Desirability. NASSP Bulletin. 85: 20-35.
Chansarkar, B. A. 2001. A controlled evaluation of web based training for teachers and
public health practitioners on prevention of eating disorders. J. Heal. Sci. 32: 97-
104.
Chapman, G. 2005. '' Federal Support for Technology in K-12 Education.'' Brookings

Clark, R. C. and R. E. Mayer .2008. On-line learning and the science of instruction:
proven guidelines for consumers and designers of multimedia learning (3rd ed.):
Pfeiffer
Cuban, C. M., Schifter, C. C. and M. E.Selverian. 2001.Teaching and learning with
technology: Beyond Constructivism. Routledge
Dallimore, E., T. Cullin. and D. William. 2005. Effects of online teaching on critical
thinking and easy writing among gifted adolescents. J. Sec. Gif. Edu. 19:180- 202.
Darabi, A., E. Sikorski and R. Harvey. 2006. Validated competencies for distance
teaching. Distance Education 27:105–122. 
Davis , N. 2007.Determinants of interactive white board success in teaching in higher

education institutions. J. Comp. Edu. 3: 823-832.

Dede,J.K. 2009. Robust designs for scalability. In L. Moller, J. B. Huett, and D. M.

Harvey (Eds), Learning and instructional technologies for the 21 century. Int. J.

Edu. Res. 3:27-48.

Deeriz, K. A. 2009. The Effect of Using Smart Board in Mathematic Course on the

Learning of Equation Solving, Hacettepe University. Inter. Edu. Sci. Conf. 6:

500-506.

Deniz, L. H. and R. Tezer. 2008. High access and low use of smart boards in high

classrooms: explaining on apparent paradox. Am. Edu. Res. J. 8: 813-834.

Dignath, W., L.Chingos, K. Lack and. I. Nygren. 2014. Interactive Learning Online at
Public Universities: Evidence from a Six-Campus Randomized Trial. J. Pol. Anal.
Mana. 33: 94-111
Dixon, F., J. Cassidy, T. Cross and D. William. 2005. Effects of smart board on critical
thinking and easy writing among gifted adolescents. J. Sec. Gif. Edu. 16: 180-
192.
Donlevy, J. (2003). Teachers, technology and training: Online learning in virtual high
school. Int. J. Ins. Med. 30: 117-121.
Dowens.,L.O. 2004. Interactive whiteboards : A powerful learning tool. Principal. The

Embattled Principal. Tech Support. 8: 63-84.

Easton, S. S. 2003. Clarifying the instructor’s role in online distance learning. J. Com.
Educ. 52: 87–105.
Ekici ,E. L. 2009. Smart board rock. Science and children. Interactive White Board in

teaching and learning-An evaluation of the smart Classroom Pilot Project. Inter. J.

Learn. Obj. 7: 249-273.

Erickso, J.A. 2008. Jordannian pre-service teachers and technology integration: a human

resources development approach. J. Edu. Tech. Soc. 1: 77-87.

Farinella, J., A. Hobbs and H. S. Weeks. 2000. Distance delivery: The faculty
perspective. J. Fin. Pra. Edu. 10: 184–194.
Felder, K. 2005. Examining the effectiveness of technology use in classroom: A tertiary

meta-analysis. J. Com. Edu. 7: 140-149.

Finch, D. and K. Jacobs. 2012. Online education: Best practices to promote learning.
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics 56th Annual Meeting.
Flynn, C. and L. Crabtree. 2013. Smart boards in elementary school: Students
engagement in high order thinking. J. Edu. Mult. Hyp. 18: 125-144.
Fullen, B. C., D.J. Colter, B. Marsh and R. Sisco. 2003. Student achievement in digital
classrooms. Paper presented at the meeting of the America. J. Edu. Reach. Ass.
Chic. 23: 6-9.
Gebre, A.S., E. T. Lwoga and C. Sanga. 2014. New Technologies for Teaching and
Learning Challenges for Higher Learning Institutions in Developing Countries.
Int. J. Edu. Development Sma. Boa. 3: 22-28.
Gikas, D. A. 2001. The impact of cognitive absorption on perceived usefulness and
perceived ease of use in on-line learning. J. Apli. Psch. 6:126-135.
Glover, D. and S. Miler. 2001. Running with technology: The pedagogic impact of the
large- scale introduction of smart boards in secondary schools, J. Infor. Tech.
Teac. Edu. 10:257-276.
Gorder, D.W 2008. Measuring on-line learning systems success in an organizational
context: Scale development and validation. 3:12-42.
Gotschall, M. 2000. On-line learning strategies for executive education and corporate
training. Fortune. 141:5-59.
Govindasamy, T. 2002. Successful implementation of On-line learning pedagogical
considerations. Int. J. Hig. Edu. 4: 287–299
Greenho, B. S. 2014. Understanding On-line learning continuance intention: An
extension of the technology acceptance model. World J. Edu. 4:55-60.
Hall, B. 2000. How to embark on your On-line learning adventure: Making sense of the
environment. On-line learning, January-March.
Hightway, A. E., J. C. Harmes and K. Kemker. 2011. Smart board in the elementary

classroom: Authentic instruction with at-risk students. J. Edu. M. Int. 4:305-312.

Hinostroza and Mellar, K. 2000. Technology Enhanced Learning Environment for self-
regulated learning a framework for research Technology, Pedagogy and
Education. 17: 221-232.
Hnadler, M 2005.An empirical examination of factors contributing to the creation of
successful On-line learning environment. Pakistan. J. Ele. Reach. 19:105-121.
Hsuil, A. 2005. Convergent and discriminant validation by multi trait and multimethod of
using internet. J. Rev. Edu. Reach. 75:247-284.
Jacobson, L. A. and M. Cakula 2013. Distance education: Definition and glossary of
terms (3rd ed.). 736 Charlotte, NC: Information Age
Jamieson, F. 2009.Acceptance of internet based learning medium: The role of extrinsic
and intrinsic motivation. J. Inf. Mana. 2:28-40.
Kamaruzman, J. E. and H. Azhari, 2009. An assessment on academic stress among
ungraduated students for on-line learning: The case of University of Botswana.
Khamis, I. E. and J. Wafa. 2014. Grade change. Tracking Online Education in the United
States. Babson Survey Research Group and Quahog Research Group, LLC
Khattak, M., S. R. J. 2015. The impacts of smart board on the students performance: A

Review of access to Information. Res. Hum. Soc. Sci. 5: 85-94.

Kirtman, L. 2009. Online versus in-class courses: An examination of differences in

learning outcomes. Issues in Teacher Education. 18: 103-116.
Knowlton, D. S. 2000. A theoretical framework for the online classroom: A defense and
delineation of a student-centered pedagogy. New Directions for Teaching and
Learning. 84: 5-14
Kochtanek, T. R. and K. K. Hein. 2000. Creating and nurturing distributed asynchronous
learning environments. Online Information Review. 24: 280-293.
Kokotsaki, S. 2014. Digital media and students learning impact of electronic books and

smart board on motivation and achievements. J. N. Eng. R. A. 9:35-39.

Komis, A.V. 2008. Examining Teachers Beliefs about Smart Board in Education:

Implications of a Teacher Preparation Programme. J. Teach. Dev. 11: 149-173.

Krupa, L. C.2007. Impact of smart board technology: An investigation of sight word

reading and observational learning. J. Aust. Dev. Dis. 36:1869-1882

Lage, M. L., G. J. Platt and M. Treglia. 2000. Inverting the Classroom: A gateway to
creating an inclusive learning environment. J. Eco. Edu. 31: 30-43.
Laval, L. F. 2004. Technology in Schools Education, ICT and the Knowledge Society.

Int. J. Edu. Res.1:1-50.

Leftwich, F. 2009. The Effects of Using Smart Boards on Elementary School Students

mathematics Achievement. J. Edu. Res. 1:1-60.

Lim, C. and L. Tay. 2003. Online learning in elementary school: Students engagement in
high order thinking. J. Edu. Multi. Hype. 12: 425-444.
Lopez, L. 2009. The Importance of Educational Technology in Teaching. Inter. J. Cog.
Res. Sci. Eng. and Edu. 3:11-114.
Lorenzetti, J. 2013. Academic Administration - Running a MOOC: Secrets of the
World’s Largest Distance Education Classes - Magna Publications.
Lou, M. L. 2001. Small group computer assisted instruction with smart board technology.

J. Rem. Spec. Edu. 30:47-57.

Lucas, A. 2000. Cultural perceptions: the missing element in the implementation of smart

board in developing countries. Int. J. Edu. Dev. 1:49-65.

Lueman,U.K. 2008. The Future of higher education: How technology will shape learning.

The Economist. Eco. Uni. N. Med. Cons. 2:1-45.

Luftglass, P. A. 2003. Teacher technology change: How knowledge, confidence, beliefs

and cultural interest. J. Res. Tech. Edu. 4: 255-284.

Macghee, K.L. 2008. Comparison of the effects of SMART Board technology and flash

card instruction on sight word recognition and obser1vational learning. J. Sp. Edu.

Tech. 1: 34-46.

Mari, S. and K. Heli. 2001. The quality of On-line learning for secondary educaion
department. The Quarterly. J. Eco. Edu. 116: 681-704.
Martins, G., A. Oswaid, S. Cosmasseto, J. Keiling and C. Goncalves. 2006. A package of
interventions to reduce school drop out in public schools in developing country. A
feasibility study. Euro. Child. Adol. Psy. 8: 442-449.
Masadeh, U. 2014. Research design and methodology in studies. J. Wal. Nat.67-87.

Masud, A. H. and X. Huang (2012). An On-line learning System Architecture based on

Cloud Computing. World Academy of Science. Engineering and Technology. 62:
74-78
Mata, L., I. Lazar and D. Lazar. 2012. The current framework of On-line learning
concept representation. Paper presented at the International Conference
“Education and Creativity for a knowledge based society.
McGonigal, K. 2005. Teaching for Transformation: From Learning Theory to Teaching
Strategies. Speaking of Teaching. 14: 1-3.
McLean, L. 2015. Depression and stress symptoms in third grade teachers Relations to
classroom quality and students achievements. J. Child. Dev. 6:945-954.
Mcloyd, B. and T. Toyokawa. 2004. The influence of On-line learning quality on
adolescents’ education values and school efforts. J. Adol. Reach. 19:716-739.
Michel, J. and L. Sandra. 2019. The Contribution of Teacher Student Relationships to
Preseverance, Dropout Prevention and Motivation for Change in Students
Attitude in Second Chance in High School. J. Soc. Beh. Sci. 2:470-475.
Michel, J. and L. Sandra. 2019. The Contribution of Teacher Student Relationships to
Preseverance, Dropout Prevention and Motivation for Change in Students
Attitude in ‘’ Second Chance’’ High School. J. Soc. Beh. Sci. 20: 470-475.
Miller, J. M. 2011. Effects of alternate teaching methods on self efficacy and
performance in computer soft ware training. J. App. Psy. 6:21-35.
Moher, V. 2012. A review of evaluation outcomes of web based continuing education.
Int. Med. Edu. 25: 312-320.
Naaji, A., Mustea, A., Holotescu, C. and C. Herman. 2015. How to Mix the Ingredients
for a Blended Course Recipe. BRAIN. Broad Research in Artificial Intelligence
and Neuroscience. 6: 106-116.
Naidu, S. 2006. On-line learning. A Guidebook of Principles, Procedures and Practices:
Commonwealth Educational Media Center for Asia (CEMCA).
Nam, C. S. and T. L. Smith-Jackson. 2007. Web-based learning environment: A theory-
based design process for development and evaluation. J. Info. Tech. Edu. 6:23-43.
Nduo, A., A. 2000. Surveying instructors and learners attitudes towards on-line learning.
J. Edu. Stu. 7:31-39.
Nedelea, A. M. and M. Costea. 2016. The Presence and Activity on Facebook of the
Informative Travel Organizations in Romania. BRAIN. Broad Research in
Artificial Intelligence and Neuroscience. 7: 41-48.
Neil Harrison, M.. 2013. Using interactive white boards to scaffold a meta language in
online teaching : Teaching higher order thinking skills in pre service teacher
education. Australian J. Edu. Tech. 29: 1:54-65.
Norman, T. 2015. Nature of research in social sciences. Int. J. Res. 32-90.
Ogori, J. A. 2009. Integrated technology into pre-service literacy instruction: A survey of

elementary education students attitude toward computers. J. Res. Comp. Edu. 3:

149-161.

Ozga, J. 2003. Two nations’ Edu. verbal and nonverbal communication

inclusion/exclusion in UK. British Edu. Reach. Association, Annual Conference
Edinburgh. 2:110-125.
Paap, K. R., J. Darrow, C. Dalibar, H. Johnson. 2014. Effects of script similarity on
online language advantages and disadvantages in executive control are likely to
be negligible or null. Frontiers in Psch.. 5:1539-1544.
Palamer, D. K., 2008. Building and destroying students “academic identities”: The power
of discourse in a two-way immersion class room. Inter. J. Qual. Stu. of Edu. 21:
647-667.
Pataker, B 2005. The influence of system characteristics on On-line learning use. J.
Coms. Res. 6:136-155.
Patricia, S. and T. Riska. 2010. Assessing technology integration in mentoring practices

during teaching: Multi-case analyses. Intern. J. Techn. Teach. Learn. Edu. 3: 66-

82.

Peak,U.N. 2001. High access and low use of smart boards in high classrooms: explaining

on apparent paradox. Am. Edu. Res. J. 8: 813-834.

Peirce, A. 2017.Privacy enhanced personalized in On-line learning.(Working Paper).

Anchorage, AK: University of Alaska Anchorage. 9: 1-53.
Pelgrum, W. J. 2001. Obstacles to the Integration of smart board in Education: Results
from a Worldwide Educational Assessment. Technology and Education. 37:2,
1630-178.
Piskurich, M. G. 2003. Preparing learners for On-line learning. San Francisco, CA:
Jossey- Bass/Pfeiffer.
Pokay, N. L. 2013. Impact of media richness and flow on on-line learning technology
acceptance. Current issues in educational planning for on-line teaching, 14:73-92.
Pollucks, R. 2009. Historical, Social and cultural influences on smart board development

in Education. Eur. J. Edu. 4: 178-192.

Reid, S. 2002. The integration of smart board into classroom teaching. Alb. J. Edu. Res.
48: 30-46.
Riel, M. and K. Fulton. 2001. The role of technology in supporting learning communities.
Phi Delta Kappan. 82: 518-523.
Roghayeh, A. and M. Sharifi. 2014. The Influence of Using Interactive Whiteboard on
Writings of EFL Students Regarding Adverbs. Procedia- Social and Behavioural
Scien 98: 242-250.
Ross, S. M. and D.L. Lowther. 2009. Effectively using technologies in education. Better
Evidence- Based Education. 2: 20-21.
Rovai, A., P. Wighting and J. Liu. 2005. SCHOOL CLIMATE: Sense of classroom and
school communities in online and on-campus higher education courses. Quarterly
Review of Distance Education. 6: 361-374
Sabir, J.S. 2004. '' Foreword'' in Information and Communication Technology in

Education - A Curriculum for Schools and Programme for Teachers

Development. Paris. Int. J. Edu. Res. 1:1-112.

Salaberry, U. 2013. Research design and methodology in studies. J. Wal. Nat.67-87.

Saleh Alshaikhi, T. 2016. The obstacles of using Smart board in teaching English at
Tabuk secondary schools. Asia. J. Edu. Res. 4: 22-39.
Saleh, T. and T. Hani Al-Anizi. 2016.The impact of using smart board in teaching
English at Tabuk secondary schools. J. Edu. Res. 4: 22-39.
Sancherz, S.2012. The Impact of Instructional Digital Technologies on Learning. A

summary for the Education Endowment Foundation. J. Edu. Soc. Res. 9 : 93-109.

Saroyan,R. B. 2014. Student's engagements in technology rich classrooms and its

relationship to professor's conceptions of effective teaching. Brit. J. Edu. Tech. 5: 83-96.

Saroyan,R. B. 2014. Student's engagements in technology rich classrooms and its

relationship to professor's conceptions of effective teaching. Brit. J. Edu. Tech. 5: 83-96.

Şaucier, A. 2009. A study of technology integration in the classroom. Int. J. Inst .M.

5:381-387.

Savenye, W.C. 2005. Improving Online Courses: What is Interaction and Why Use It?
(Undetermined). Distance Learning. 2: 22-28.
Schlosser, L. A. and M. Simonsom 2009. Distance education: Definition and glossary of
terms (3rd ed.). 736 Charlotte, NC: Information Age
Shaw ,E. L. 2011. Smart board rock. Science and children. Interactive White Board in

teaching and learning-An evaluation of the smart Classroom Pilot Project. Inter. J. Learn.

Obj. 7: 249-273.
Sherry, L. 2005. Issues in distance learning. Int. J. Edu. Tel. 1: 337–365.
Shung, D.W 2004. Measuring on-line learning systems success in an organizational
context: Scale development and validation. 3:12-42.
Sife, A.S., E. T. Lwoga and C. Sanga. 2007. New Technologies for Teaching and
Learning Challenges for Higher Learning Institutions in Developing Countries.
Int. J. Edu. Development Sma. Boa. 3: 22-28.
Singh, E. 2014. Learning theory and online technologies. Open Learning. J. Ope. Dis. e-
Lea. 29: 89-92.
Smith, F., F. Hardman and S. Higgins. 2006. The impact of the interactive smart board
on teacher pupil interaction in the national literacy and numeracy
strategies. J. Bri. Edu. Res.32: 443-457.
Smith, F., F. Hardman and S. Higgins. 2006. The impact of the interactive smart board
on teacher pupil interaction in the national literacy and numeracy
strategies. J. Bri. Edu. Res.32: 443-457.
Soori, S. J. A. 2014. Integration of SMART boards in EFL classroom. Inter. J. Edu. Liter.

Stud. 2:20-23.

Spiehogel, M.R.2005. Critical Issue: Using Technology to Improve Students

Achievements. New York: Nor. Reg. Edu. Lab. 1: 5112-134.

Steffens, K. 2008. Technology Enhanced Learning Environment for self- regulated

learning a framework for research Technology, Pedagogy and Education. 17:3,
221-232.
Stephanie Anne Ferris. 2010. The impact of smart board on the literacy teaching and
learning in an inclusion third grade classrooms.
Sternbary, L. H. 2008. High access and low use of smart boards in high classrooms:

explaining on apparent paradox. Am. Edu. Res. J. 8: 813-834.

Stewart, C. M., Schifter, C. C. and M. E.Selverian. 2010.Teaching and learning with

technology: Beyond Constructivism. Routledge
Stipek, I. E. and J. Seaman. 2014. Grade change. Tracking Online Education in the
United States. Babson Survey Research Group and Quahog Research Group. J.
Edu. Res. 45:89-91.
Stokes- Jones. T. 2010. Integrated smart board technology in the elementary class room
essentials. Int. J. Edu. 7:321-335.
Stostic, L. 2015. The Importance of Educational Technology in Teaching. Inter. J. Cog.
Res. Sci. Eng. and Edu. 3:11-114.
Strudler, S. 2008. Assessing technology integration in mentoring practices during

teaching: Multi-case analyses. Intern. J. Techn. Teach. Learn. Edu. 3: 66-82.

Swat, J. M. 2002. Effects of alternate teaching methods on self efficacy and performance
in computer soft ware training. J. App. Psy. 6:21-35.
Tara, J. and N. Leffingwell. 2016. The Benefits of Reading Racetrack with Flash cards, a
Smart Board and Time Delay Using in Increasing Sight word Recognition and
Fluency with Special Education Students.
Tarhini, A. 2014. A study of technology integration in the classroom. Int. J. Inst .M.

5:381-387.

Tebabal, M. L. 2002. Small group computer assisted instruction with smart board

technology. J. Rem. Spec. Edu. 30:47-57.

Tenekeci, E. 2011. Preliminary study for technology enhanced learning: comparative

study of England and Northern Cyprus. Tur. Online. J. Edu. Tech. 10: 300-310.
Tercan, E. 2012. Preliminary study for technology enhanced learning: comparative study
of England and Northern Cyprus. Tur. Online. J. Edu. Tech. 10: 4, 300-310.
Termit K. and M. Rashid . 2012. Secondary students perspectives on the use of mobile
phone for teaching and learning of Science in Malaysia. J. Edu. Prac. 3: 9-14.
Tezer J.S. 2002. '' Foreword'' in Information and Communication Technology in

Education - A Curriculum for Schools and Programme for Teachers

Development. Paris. Int. J. Edu. Res. 1:1-112.

Thomson, L. D. 2010. Beyond the Classroom Walls: Teachers’ and Students’
Perspectives on How Online Learning Can Meet the Needs of Gifted Students. J.
Adv. Aca. 21:662-712.
Turel, M. 2006. Creating successful On-line learning - A rapid system for getting it right
first time, every time. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer.
Umanuma, K. 2014. Producing knowledge about qualitative approaches in social

education. 129-149.

Umoren, G. 2006. Information and Communication Technology and Curriculum. Nigeria

of Curriculum Studies. Calabar Chapter. 2 : 57-83.
Uzunboylu, H. K. 2012. The trends in technology supported collaborative learning

studiesin 21th century. W. J. Edu. Tech. 3:103-119.

Veiluf, J.H. 2003. Using computer technology in learning : Building an infrastructure for
learning. Amer. J. Com. Edu. 2:21-45.
Verma, L. M., E. Crais and L. Vernon-Feagns. 2013. Predicting secondary school
teachers acceptance and the use of digital learning environment: A cross sectional
study. J. Com. Hum. Beh. 22: 71-83.
Volman, M. 2005. A variety of roles for a new type of teacher educational technology
and teaching profession. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21:13-15.
Wafa, M. N. M. 2014. The effect of using smart board on mathematics achievement

and retention of seventh grade students. Int. J. Edu. 6:107-110.

Waxman, H. and S. Huang. 2006. Difference by level of technology use on students

motivation, anxiety and classroom learning environment in mathematics. J. Edu.
Tech. 25:66-67.
Wazman, J. and N. Haung. 2006. The Benefits of Reading Racetrack with Flash cards, a
Smart Board and Time Delay Using in Increasing Sight word Recognition and
Fluency with Special Education Students.
Welsh, E., T. Wanberg, C. Brown K. and M. Simmering. 2003. On-line learning:
Emerging uses, empirical results and future directions. Int. J. Trai. Dev. 7:245–
258.
White, W. K. and J. J. Baker. 2003. The Student Guide to Successful Online Learning: A
handbook of Tips, Strategies and Techniques. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Allyn and
Bacon.
Wilson, S.2014. The Impact of Instructional Digital Technologies on Learning. A

summary for the Education Endowment Foundation. J. Edu. Soc. Res. 9 : 93-109.

Wyche, R. and T. Glym. 2004.How to keep e- learner from e- scaping. J Edu. Dep. 7:21-
22.
You, J. W. and M. Kang. 2014.The role of academic emotions in the relationship between
perceived academic control and self-regulated learning in online learning. J. Com.
Edu. 77:125-133.
Zaber, S. 2010. Strategy for socio-economic development. J. Cen. Nat. Con. 20-76.
Zakria, E. F. Craik and G. Luk. 2012. Issues of On-line learning standards and identity
management for mobility and collaboration in higher education. J. Pak. Edu.
16:240-250.
Zeepak, T. 2018. Online learning and its effects on cognitive skills development. Int . J.
Lea. Edu. 9:56-70.
Zhang, E. and F. Craik. 2010. Effectiveness and cost of education using computer
mediated communication. Amer. J. Dis. Edu 19:12-23.
Zimmerman, B. J. and P. O. Schunk. 2001. Self-regulated learning and academic
achievement: Theoretical perspectives. J. Edu. Res. 3:76-79.
Zorman,D.U. 2011. Using interactive White Board in teaching and learning. An

evaluation of the smart classroom Pilot Project. Inter. J. Lear. Obj. 7: 249-273.

==========

Hotocom, E. 2015. “Online learning”. In Annual Review of Information Science and

Technology. 36: 503–589.
Tarhini, R. 2014. Information systems and developing countries: Failure, success, and
local improvisations. J. Inf. Soc. 18:101-112.
Koohang, E. 2012. Development of instructional tools for online learning: what do users
Want. Online Information Review. 6:22-29.
Khan, A. 2010. The impact of electronic instructional resources on scholarly
communication: challenges and opportunities for university libraries in
Pakistan. J. Inf. Tec.9: 34-37.
Stansfield, T.. 2009. The people in digital learning: Multifaceted approaches to assessing
needs and impact. Digital library use: Social practice in design and evaluation.
119-160.
Fischer, L. S. 2009. A user‐oriented evaluation of digital libraries: An application of the
Technology Acceptance Model. Inter. J. Inf. Man. 29:196-209.

Mothibi, N. K. 2009. Undergraduate students’ perceptions of online learning: A case

study. The International Information and Library Review. 42:149-153.
Scholtz, F., and T. Kapeso. 2008. Applying the technology acceptance model to Iranian
engineering faculty libraries. Int. J. Elec. Edu. 57:215-242.

Skochelak, A. M. 2008. User perceptions of digital libraries: a case study in

Italy. Performance measurement and metrics.
Draus, P. 2008. Perceived influence of the use of electronic information resources on
scholarly work and publication productivity. J. Soc. Inf. Sci. Tech. 59:602-612.
Shafieiosgouei, V., M.G. Morris, D.B. Davis and F.D. Davis. 2007. User acceptance of
information technology.7: 425-478.
Stewart, W. 2008. Digital library services: perceptions and expectations of user
communities and librarians in a New Zealand academic library. J. Aus. Aca. Res.
Lib. 1: 56-70.
Mueller Y. M. 2006. Individual differences, perceived ease of use, and perceived
usefulness in the e-Library usage. J. Com. Inf. Sci. 2: 76-83.
Ellaway, L. S. and M.L. Masters. 2006. Virtual reference services: On the trail of the
elusive non‐user: What research in virtual reference environments reveals.  Int. J.
Ame. Soc. Tec. 34:25-28.
Maseleno, F.D. 2005. User acceptance of information technology: system characteristics,
user perceptions and behavioral impacts. Int. J. Mac. Stu. 38:475-487.
Salaberry, M. 2013. The role of technology acceptance model in explaining effect on e-
commerce application system. Inter. J. Man. Inf. Tec. 3:1-14.
Norman, O. 2014. Resistance to change and the adoption of digital libraries: An
integrative model. J. Soc. Inf. Sci. Tec. 60:1702-1708.