TESDA Organizational Excellence Awards Guidelines

TESDA CIRCULAR
Subject: Implementing Guidelines for the TESDA Page 1 of 11 page/s

Organizational Excellence Awards Number WI , series of 2021
Date Issued:
Effectivity: As Indicated Supersedes:
May 14, 2021
In view of TESDA's continuous drive for quality management and excellence in public
service, TESDA shall implement the 2020 TESDA Organizational Awards with the following
implementing guidelines.
I. Rationale
TESDA is mandated to provide relevant, accessible, high quality, and efficient technical
education and skills development. It is a quality organization steered by educated public
servants. Its drive for quality and excellence is evidenced by the ISO 9001:2008 it has
sustained since 2012 and currently the ISO 9001:2015 Certification. TESDA likewise
garnered the Philippine Quality Award Commitment level.
The TESDA management recognizes the efforts particularly of the Field Offices who
have diligently worked hard to pursue the varied and arduous tasks and responsibilities
through the TESDA Program on Awards and Incentives for Service Excellence (TESDA-
PRAISE).
The TESDA-PRAISE aims to encourage, recognize, and reward accomplishments and

other personal efforts of employees on a continuing basis.
Beginning in 2019, TESDA has organized and implemented the Organizational

Excellence Awards to recognize the accomplishments of the Regional, Provincial
Offices and the TESDA training institutions as embodied in the TESDA-PRAISE.
II. Program Description
The TESDA Organizational Excellence Awards (TOEA) is a component of TESDA-

PRAISE which adheres to the principle of providing incentives and awards based on
performance, culture of innovativeness and excellence. The awards incentives are
designed in such a way that there will be "building blocks" or sub-components for
every major category that will be able to align efforts and accomplishments of the
whole organization.
The Organizational Awards include the following:
• Best Regional Office (BRO) Award

The Best Regional Office (BRO) Award shall be given to the Regional Office
that excelled in the effective supervision, coordination, integration and
implementation and monitoring of TVET programs within their region. It shall
also be in line with TESDA's commitment and thrust as a quality-assured and
corrupt-free organization.
TESDA CIRCULAR
Organizational Excellence Awards Number 0(11 , series of 2021
Date Issued:
May 14, 2021
• Galing Probinsya Award

The Galing Probinsya Award shall be given to the Provincial Office that excelled
in the effective supervision, coordination, integration and implementation and
monitoring of TVET programs within their province.
• Best Training Institution Award

The Best Training Institution Award shall be given to the Training Institution that
excelled in the effective administration and implementation of TVET programs
offered by their training institution.
III. Objectives
The TESDA organizational Awards shall seek to:

1. To evaluate the performance of the Regional Offices, Provincial Offices and
TESDA Training Institutions;
2. To identify areas of strengths and weaknesses which shall serve as bases for
strategies and appropriate interventions;
3. To recognize good practices and innovations; and
4. To provide incentives and recognition for organizational excellence
IV. Scope and Coverage
1. The Best Regional Office and Galing Probinsya Awards shall cover the
performance of the Regional Offices and Provincial Offices;
2. The Best Training Institution Awards shall cover TESDA Training Institutions
(TTIs);
3. The Award shall cover regional, provincial and TTIs performance for the
preceding year;
4. The regions and provinces shall be grouped into small, medium and large,
based on the share of overall outputs:
a. Regional Grouping
SMALL MEDIUM LARGE

(6 Regions) (6 Regions) (4 Regions)
CAR Region I Region NCR
Region II Region V Region III
Region IV-B Region VI Region IV-A
Region VIII Region X Region VII
Region IX Region XI
Caraga Region XII
TESDA CIRCULAR
Organizational Excellence Awards Number to, series of 2021
Date Issued:
May 14, 2021
b. Provincial Grouping
SMALL MEDIUM LARGE

Region
(38 Provinces) (25 Provinces) (18 Provinces)
Pasay-Makati CaMaNaVa
Manila
NCR MuntiParLasTaPat
PaMaMaRiSan
Quezon City
Abra Benguet
Apayao
CAR Ifugao
Kalinga
Mt. Province
Ilocos Norte Pangasinan
I !locos Sur
La Union
Batanes Cagayan
II Nueva Vizcaya Isabela
Quirino
Aurora Pampanga Bulacan
III Bataan Tarlac Nueva Ecija
Zambales
Batangas
Cavite
IV-A Laguna
Quezon
Rizal
Marinduque Oriental Mindoro
IV-B Occidental Mindoro Palawan
Romblon
Camarines Norte Albay
Catanduanes Camarines Sur
V
Masbate
Sorsogon
Aklan Iloilo Negros Occidental
Antique
VI
Capiz
Guimaras
TESDA CIRCULAR
Organizational Excellence Awards Number ()Li , series of 2021
Date Issued:
May 14, 2021
Siquijor Bohol Cebu
VII
Negros Oriental
Biliran Leyte
Eastern Samar
VIII Northern Samar
Samar
Southern Leyte
Zamboanga Zamboanga Del
IX Sibugay Norte
Zamboanga Del Sur
Camiguin Bukidnon Misamis Oriental
X Misamis Lanao del Norte
Occidental
Compostela Davao City/Davao
Valley/Davao de del Sur
XI Oro
Davao del Norte
Davao Oriental
North Cotabato
Sarangani
XII
South Cotabato
Sultan Kudarat
Agusan del Norte Surigao del Sur

CARAG Agusan del Sur
A Dinagat Island
Surigao del Norte
Note: The classification of the sizes of the Regional and Provincial Offices into Small,
Medium, and Large categories were based on the study completed by the
Administrative Service in determining the number of plantilla positions per province
and the formulation applied by the TWG in the 2020 TOEA Guidelines. The following
were the indicators utilized in the two analyses: Population, Income Classification,
Number of Legislative Divisions (Congressional Districts), Number of Registered
Programs, and Number of Accredited Qualifications of Assessment Centers.
5. The TTIs shall be grouped as follows:

a. Provincial Training Centers (PTCs)
b. Regional and Specialized Training Centers; and
c. TESDA Administered Schools
TESDA CIRCULAR
Organizational Excellence Awards Number pip , series of 2021
Date Issued:
May 14, 2021
V Eligibility for Organizational Awards
To be eligible for the Award, the Regional and Provincial Offices, TTIs should have
complied with the following:
Good Governance Indicators such as:

o Adherence to Transparency Seal requirements as applicable;
o 100% Submission of Statement of Assets, Liabilities, and Networth of officials
and staff; and
o Posting of Citizen's Charter in conspicuous areas such as entrances,
administrative offices, etc.
All Regional, Provincial Offices, and TTIs that meet all of the above-mentioned
requirements shall be included in the evaluation based on the criteria.
VI. Mechanics of Implementation
1. The Regional and Provincial Offices and TTIs shall be evaluated based on the
following criteria:
A. BRO and Galing Probinsya Award

Good Governance Measures 190 points
Implementation of TESDA Programs 595 points
Administrative and Support Services (PBB Indicators) 125 points
Reporting Efficiency 50 points
Social Media Marketing and Advocacy 40 points
TOTAL 1000 points
B. Best Training Institution Award

Good Governance Measures 190 points
Implementation of TESDA Programs 595 points
Administrative and Support Services (PBB Indicators) 125 points
Reporting Efficiency 50 points
Social Media Marketing and Advocacy 40 points
TOTAL 1000 points
2. The Secretariat shall gather and process the information to come up with the
initial computation of the scores of each Regional Office based on the set criteria.
The evaluation shall be based on documents submitted to the Central Office as
required. Other evidence shall be validated on-site, as necessary.
TESDA CIRCULAR
Organizational Excellence Awards Number ()41 , series of 2021
Date Issued:
May 14, 2021
3. The Regional Office shall gather and process information to come up with the
initial computation of the scores of each Provincial Office and TTIs based on the
set criteria. All evaluation results shall be submitted to the Technical Working
Group (TWG) on TESDA Organizational Excellence Awards. The Regional Office
shall select the Galing Probinsya and Best Training Institution nominees to be
endorsed to the TWG.
4. The TWG, with the assistance of the secretariat, shall evaluate and process the
documents/evidence and provide the initially processed record and documents to
the Third Party evaluators.
5. The Third Party evaluators shall review the record and documents and shall
come up with their recommendations to be forwarded to the National Board of
Judges who shall then select the awardees.
6. Additional points shall be given to the Regions and Provinces with the least
percentage of revoked programs over the total number of registered programs
within each region/province wherein the revocations were the result of the
recommendations of the IIAS.
7. The regions, provinces and TTIs shall be ranked according to points garnered.
8. There shall be one awardee for each group of regions, provinces, and TTIs. The
awardee should have a score of at least 500 points and no zero score in any
major criterion.
9. Special Awards shall be given to regions, provinces, and TTIs with Best Green
Practices, and Best Innovations.
10. The conferment of awardees shall be part of the yearly TESDA Anniversary
Program
11. The awardees shall receive a Plaque of Recognition and cash award, subject to
Civil Service Commission approved TESDA-PRAISE guidelines. Additional
incentives shall be provided over and above these rewards.
TESDA CIRCULAR
Organizational Excellence Awards Number qi, series of 2021
Date Issued:
May 14, 2021
VII. Criteria
A. Best Regional Office (BRO) and Galing Probinsya Award

1. The following are the major requirements with their corresponding point values:
Point
Requirement
Value
A. Good Governance Measures 190
A.1. Compliance to Zero Corruption Policy 40
A.2. Compliance to the TESDA Code of Conduct and Ethical Standards 30
A.3. Customer Satisfaction Results 30
A.4. Compliance to Commission on Audit Rules and Regulations 30
A.5. Compliance to PhiIGEPS requirements 30
A.6. Liquidation of Cash Advances 20
A.7. Compliance to Agency Procurement Compliance Performance
10
Indicator (APCPI)
B. Implementation of TESDA Programs 595
B.1. Implementation of Priority Programs 45
B.2. Accomplishment based on the Government Appropriation Act
260
(GAA) and TESDA OPCR indicators
B.3. Participation and Awards from Skills Competition 25
B.4. Institutional Awards 60
B.5. Accreditation Awards 40
B.6. Enterprise-based programs implemented 15
B.7. Partnerships forged and implemented 15
B.8. Best Practices and Innovations 30 _
B.9. Quality Management System Implementation 20
B.10. Compliance to the Directives of the Secretary 85
C. Administrative and Support Services 125
C.1. Budget Utilization Rate (BUR) 25
C.2. Implementation of Agency Action Plan and Status of
Implementation (AAPSI) on the Prior Years Audit 25
Recommendation
C.3. Green Practices 15
C.4. Staff Development Program 35
C.5. Model Employee Awards 25
D. Reporting Efficiency 50
D.1. Timeliness, Consistency and Accuracy
E. Social Marketing and Advocacy 40
E.1. Communication Program (OPCR)
GRAND TOTAL 1000
TESDA CIRCULAR
Organizational Excellence Awards Number DO, series of 2021
Date Issued:
May 14, 2021
The details of the above-mentioned requirements are in the Scoring Guides
attached herewith as Annexes A and B.
2. For BRO Award:

a) a demerit of 10 points from the total score shall be applied if there are
findings discovered during ISO 9001:2015 TUV SUD audit which were
not addressed;
b) 10 points shall be added to the total score for regional office's initiatives
that are deemed beneficial and contribute to the improvement of the
process.
B. Best Training Institution Award
The following are the major requirements with their corresponding point value:
Point
Requirement
Value
A.1. Compliance to Zero Corruption Policy 40
A.2. Compliance to the TESDA Code of Conduct and Ethical Standards 30
A.3. Customer Satisfaction Results 30
A.4. Compliance to Commission on Audit Rules and Regulations 30
A.S. Compliance to PhiIGEPS requirements 30
A.6. Liquidation of Cash Advances 20
A.7. Compliance to Agency Procurement Compliance Performance
10
Indicator (APCPI)
B. Implementation of TESDA Programs 595
B.2. Accomplishment based on the Government Appropriation Act
255
(GAA) and TESDA OPCR indicators
B.S. Accreditation Awards 40
B.6. Partnerships forged 30
B.7. Best Practices and Innovations 30
B.B. Compliance to the Directives of the Secretary 65
TESDA CIRCULAR
Organizational Excellence Awards Number ty41, series of 2021
Date Issued:
May 14, 2021
C.2. Implementation of Agency Action Plan and Status of
25
Implementation (AAPSI) on the Prior Years Audit Recommendation
C.3. Green Practices 15
D.1. Timeliness, Consistency and Accuracy
E.1. Communication Program
GRAND TOTAL 1000
The details of the above-mentioned requirements are in the Scoring Guide attached
herewith as Annex C.
VIII. Selection Process
1. The TWG members shall deliberate on the nominees (Regional Office,

Galing Probinsya and Best Training Institution) and initially process the
submitted documents/evidence. They shall come up with the list and ranking
of all the nominees in all the categories.
2. The Third Party evaluators shall review the records/documents submitted by

the TVVG and shall provide the National Board of Judges (NBOJ) of their
recommendations.
3. The Third Party is a three-member team composed of representatives from

NGAs and a Quality Management expert.
4. The NBOJ shall deliberate on the listings/records provided by the Third Party
evaluators and select the awardees in all the categories.
5. The National Board of Judges, shall be composed of seven (7) members:
a. Assistant Secretary — Department of Trade and Industry (DTI)

b. Representative from the Department of Interior and Local Government
(DILG)
c. Private Sector Representatives (preferably, TESDA Board Members)
from the following:
i. Employers Group — 1
ii. Labor Group — 1
iii. TVET Institutions — 2
iv. NGOs — 1
The Chairperson and Co-chairperson of the NBOJs shall be chosen from
among the members of the Board.
I
TESDA CIRCULAR
Organizational Excellence Awards Number oqi , series of 2021
Date Issued:
May 14, 2021
IX. Awards and Recognition

1. Awardees
Each awardee for the Best Regional Office shall receive a plaque of
recognition and a cash award/incentive of Php100,000.00. All Galing
Probinsya awardees shall receive a plaque of recognition and a cash
award/incentive of Php75,000.00. The winners of the Best Training
Institutions shall receive a plaque of recognition and a cash
award/incentive of Php75,000.00.
- Other incentives shall be provided over and above these rewards.
2. Special Awards
2.1. The Best Green Practice award shall be given to the Regional Office
(RO), Provincial Office (PO) or Training Institution (TI) that exemplified in the
implementation of greening the TVET. It includes the formulation and
conceptualization of green tvet policies and strategies, promotion of green
jobs and skills, green community and the implementation of green tvet
activities and practices.
2.2. The Best Innovation award shall be given to the RO, PO, or TI that
created and implemented a meaningful change that improved the system of
TVET delivery and/or effectiveness of the services or programs. It involves
the adoption of idea, process, technology, and product that is new to the
previous application to the program or services.
X. Schedule of Implementation
Activity Date Person
Responsible
Finalization of the 2020 May 14, 2021 Technical Working
Implementing Guidelines and Group (TWG)
Criteria for BRO, Galing
Probinsya (GP), and Best
Training Institution Awards
Approval of the Implementing May 17, 2021 Secretary/Director

Guidelines (IG) General
Dissemination of Implementing May 18, 2021 Secretariat

Guidelines to the Regional
Offices
TESDA CIRCULAR
Organizational Excellence Awards Number AL, series of 2021
Date Issued:
30 April 2021
Processing of Reg.onal Office May 21, 2021 TVVG/Secretariat
Performance based on
available/submitted data in 2020
Submission of Provincial Office May 18-June 18, Regional Offices
and TTI nominees to the 2021
Technical Working Group
Processing of nominees for GP June - July 16, 2021 TWG/Secretariat
and Best TI
Review and deliberation of June 25, 2021 Third Party

regional performance evaluators
Deliberation of top scorers 3 August 2021 Third Party
evaluators
Selection of the 2020 awardees 13 August 2021 National Board of
for BRO, GP and Best TI Judges
Awarding of Best Regional TESDA Anniversary Secretary/Director
Office, Galing Probinsya, and August 25, 2021 General
Best Training Institution
Expenses for implementation of this Program shall be charged against the Institutional
Event Funds.
Wide dissemination of this Circular to all concerned is hereby enjoined.
SEC. ISI
i 0 S. LAPENA, PhL)., CSEE
Director General
Annex A - Criteria for Best BRO Award
Requirement Weighted Score Point Value

A. Good. • rnance Measures 11111.1L .1.90._
A.1. Compliance to Zero Corruption Policy weighted score 40
The Region has no personnel with administrative case filed with TESDA Administrative and
40
Complaints Committee (ACC)
The Region has at least one administrative case filed with TESDA Administrative and Complaints
0
Committee (ACC)
A.2. Compliance to the TESDA Code of Conduct and Ethical Standards
Valid Complaints against any Official or Employee on the following specific rules of conduct:
• Fidelity to Duty
• Conflict of Interest
• Solicitation and Acceptance of Gifts
• Outside Employment
• Cronyism
• Confidentiality
• Post-employment
• Procurement of Goods, Consulting Services, and Infrastructure Projects
• Encouraging Reporting of Malpractices, Corruption, and other Protected Disclosures Valid
• Complaints from Presidential Action Center (888) and CSC-Contact Center ng Bayan
Adverse National ISP Findings
*Valid complaints are complaints that are officially filed, received, and verified by the
Administrative and Complaints Committee (ACC)/
Investigation Committee
weighted score 30
There are no valid complaints, findings against any Official and Employee. 30
There are 1-3 complaint/s, findings against any Official and Employee. 20
There are 4-6 complaints, findings against any Official and Employee. 10
There are 10 or more complaints, findings against any Official and Employee. 0
A.3. Customer Satisfaction Results
weighted score 30
Customer Net Satisfaction Rating with minimum of 95%
Customer Net Satisfaction Rating is at 99% and above 30
Customer Net Satisfaction Rating is at 98% 20
Customer Net Satisfaction Rating is below 95% 0
A.4. Compliance to Commission on Audit Rules and Regulations weighted score 30
There are no suspensions and disallowances 30
There are suspensions and disallowances 0
A.5. Compliance to PhiIGEPS requirements weighted score 30
100% compliance from Publication to Notice and Award and notice to proceed 30
Non-compliance from Publication to Notice and Award and notice to proceed 0
A.6. Liquidation of Cash Advances (Foreign and Local Travel Expenses) 20
A.6.A. Liquidation of Foreign Travel Expenses weighted score 10
All Foreign Travel Expenses liquidated within 60 days 10
Partial number of Foreign Travel Expenses liquidated beyond 60 days 0
A.6.B. Liquidation of Local Travel Expenses weighted score 10
All Local Travel Expenses liquidated within 30 days 10
Partial number of Local Travel Expenses liquidated beyond 30 days 0
A.7. Compliance to Agency Procurement Compliance Performance Indicator (APCPI) weighted score 10
The regional office is compliant to APCPI 10
The regional office is not compliant to APCPI 0

B. Implementation of TESDA Programs weighted score 595
B.1.A. Global Competitiveness 15
B.1.A.1. Reintegration of OFWs weighted score 7
The regional office has at least 3-5 programs conducted 7
The regional office has less than 3-5 programs conducted 0
B.1.A.2. Implementation of recognized Diploma Programs weighted score 8
The regional office has at least 3 programs conducted 8
The regional office has less than 3 programs conducted 0
B.1.B. Social Equity 30
B.1.B.1. Skills Training for Drug Dependents weighted score 6
B.1.6.2. Skills Training for Inmates and their Families weighted score 6
B.1.6.3. Special Skills Programs for IPs weighted score 6
B.1.6.4. Expanded Training Program for Women and PWDs weighted score 6
B.1.B.5. Training Programs for Other Specials Clients weighted score 6
B.2. Accomplishment based on the Government Appropriation Act (GAA) and TESDA OPCR
indicators
260
Including Process Cycle Time, Accomplishment Rates, Compliance Rates
All MFOs (PBB Criteria)
6.2.A. Active TESD Committees weighted score 10
The accomplishment rate based on set target is at 100% and above 10
The accomplishment rate based on set target is below 100% 0
B.2.B. Number of Programs Registered weighted score 10
B.2.C. Process Cycle Time for CTPR Issuance (7days) weighted score 15
B.2.D. Number of Programs Audited weighted score 15
B.2.E. 85% compliance of WET Programs to TESDA, Industry, Standards, and requirements weighted score 10
The percentage of compliance to audit breaches is at 1% and below 10
The percentage of compliance to audit breaches is at more than 1% 0
B.2.F. Number of skilled workers assessed for certification weighted score 15
B.2.G. Number of TVET Trainers weighted score 15
B.2.H. Number of Assessors weighted score 15
B.2.I. Number of Assessment Centers weighted score 15

B.2.1. 86% of WET graduates that undergo assessment for certification weighted score 15
B.2.K. 90% of skilled workers issued with Certification within 7 days of their application weighted score 15
B.2.L. Number of Scholarship Programs enrolled weighted score 35
B.2.M. Number of Scholarship Programs graduates weighted score 35
B.2.N. Number of TTIs enrollees weighted score 10
B.2.0. Number of TTIs graduates weighted score 10
B.2.P. TVET enrolment and graduates by delivery mode- institution-based weighted score 5
B.2.Q. WET enrolment and graduates by delivery mode- enterprise-based weighted score 5
B.2.R. WET enrolment and graduates by delivery mode- community-based weighted score 5
B.2.S. Implementation of WCO weighted score 5
B.3.A. Participation weighted score 5
The Region participated in all competitions (PNSC, ASC, and World Skills Competition) 5
The Region participated in PNSC 3
The Region did not participate in any of the competition 0
B.3.B. Awards received at the national level weighted score 10
The Region received award/recognition at the national level 10
The Region did not receive award/recognition 0
B.3.C. Awards received at the international level weighted score 10
The Region received award/recognition at the international level 10
The Region did not receive award/recognition 0
B.4.A. TESDA Idol (Wage-employed) 15
B.4.A.1. Participation weighted score 5
The Region participated in TESDA Idol (Wage-employed) 5
The Region did not participate in TESDA Idol (Wage-employed) 0
B.4.A.2. Awards received weighted score 10
The Region did not receive award/recognition at the national level 0
B.4.B. TESDA Idol (Self-employed) 15
B.4.B.1. Participation weighted score 5
The Region participated in TESDA Idol (self-employed) 5
The Region did not participate in TESDA Idol (self-employed) 0
B.4.B.2. Awards received weighted score 10

6.4.C. Tagsanay 15
B.4.C.1. Participation weighted score 5
The Region participated in Tagsanay Awards 5
The Region did not participate in Tagsanay Awards 0
B.4.C.2. Awards received weighted score 10
B.4.D. Kabalikat Awards 15
6.4.D.1. Participation weighted score 5
The Region participated in Kabalikat Awards 5
The Region did not participate in Kabalikat Awards 0
B.4.D.2. Awards received weighted score 10
B.5. Accreditation Awards (STAR Program, APACC) 40
B.S.A. Asia Pacific Accreditation and Certification Commission (APACC) 15
The region nominated TVI/s for APACC accreditation 5
The region did not nominate any TVI/s for APACC accreditation 0
6.5.A.2. Awards received weighted score 10
The nominated TVI/s of the region received APACC accreditation 10
The nominated TVI/s of the region did not receive APACC accreditation 0
B.5.B. System for TVET Accreditation and Recognition (STAR) Program 25
The Region participated in STAR Program 5
The Region did not participate in STAR Program 0
The region received at least one THREE STAR Level Award 20
The region received at least one TWO STAR Level Award 10
The region received at least one ONE STAR Level Award 5
The region did not receive a STAR Level Award 0
B.6. Enterprise-based programs implemented
• To be measured in terms of resources and increase in program outputs 15
• Dual Training System (DTS) and Apprenticeship/Learnership Programs
Both Dual Training System (DTS), Apprenticeship programs implemented 15
The Dual Training System (DTS) or Apprenticeship program is implemented 10
The Dual Training System (DTS) and Apprenticeship program are not implemented 0
B.7. Partnerships forged and implemented
• to be measured in terms of resources and increase in program outputs 15
• CSR — partnership with private companies
For Large Regions: Partnerships with three (3) or more industries / private companies and with
continuing tie-ups for the last two (2) years with the same industries/companies;
For Medium Regions: Partnerships with two (2) or more industries / private companies and with
15
continuing tie - ups for the last two (2) years with the same industries/companies:
For Small Regions: Partnership with more than one (1) industry / private company and with
continuing tie-ups for the last two (2) years with the same industry/company
For Large Regions: Partnerships with less than three (3) industries / private companies and with
continuing tie-ups for the last two (2) years with the same industries/companies;
For Medium Regions: Partnerships with less than two (2) industries / private companies and
10
with continuing tie - ups for the last two (2) years with the same industries/companies;
For Small Regions: Partnership with one (1) industry / private company and with continuing tie-
ups for the last two (2) years with the same industry/company;
For Large Regions: Partnerships with less than three (3) industries / private companies and with
continuing tie-ups for less than two (2) years with the same industries/companies;
For Medium Regions: Partnerships with less than two (2) industries / private companies and
5
with continuing tie-ups for less than two (2) years with the same industries/companies;
For Small Regions: Partnership with one (1) industry / private company and with continuing tie-
ups for less than two (2) years with the same industries/companies;
No partnership forged. 0

B.8. Best Practices and Innovations (engagement in the creation or design of new process or techniques
30
that help in the improvement of services offered)
The region is engaged in the creation or design of new processes or techniques that helps in the
30
improvement of services offered and is implemented by the regional office
The region is engaged in the creation or design of new processes or techniques that helps in the
improvement of services offered but is not implemented by the regional office 15
The region is not engaged in the creation or design of new processes or techniques in the
0
improvement of services
B.9.A. Number of Active IQA Lead Auditor/s weighted score 8
The region has more than more than four (4) active IQA Lead Auditors/Auditors 8
The region has two (2) to four (4) active IQA Lead Auditors/ Auditors 4
The region has less than two (2) active IQA Lead Auditors/ Auditors 0
B.9.B. Timely Submission of Reports/Documents (e.g. IQA reports, Action Catalog, NAP) weighted score 6
The region submitted report/doc ahead of deadline 6
The region submitted report/docs on set deadline 3
The region submitted report/doc after set deadline 0
B.9.C. Percentage of Personnel Attendance to Central Office initiated QMS-related training
weighted score 6
programs
>80% of regional personnel attended QMS related training programs 6
40% to 80% of regional personnel attended QMS related training programs 3
<40% of regional personnel attended QMS related training programs 0
*Plus (1) Point for ROPO initiated QMS related training programs of personnel 1
B.10. Compliance to Secretary's Directives 85
B.10.A. Program Registration
Note: Included are those TTIs that were recognized until the 1st semester of CY2020 and have the 51
capacity to comply on the various directives on program registration.
6.10.A.1. Agri-Related Courses weighted score 5
100% of full-fledged TTIs in the region have registered and implemented program/s 5
2
100% of full-fledged TTIs in the region have registered program/s but not all have implementation
Not all full-fledged TTIs in the region have registered program/s. 0
B.10.A.2. Construction Related Courses weighted score 5
100% of full-fledged TTIs in the region have registered and implemented program/s 5
2
Not all full-fledged TTIs in the region have registered program/s. 0
B.10.A.3. Driving NC II weighted score 5
100% of full-fledged TTIs in the region have registered and implemented program 5
2
Not all full-fledged TTIs in the region have registered program. 0
B.10.A.4. Contact Tracing II weighted score 12
100% of full-fledged TTIs in the region have registered and implemented program 12
100% of full-fledged TTIs in the region have registered program but not all have implementation 8
at least 70% of full-fledged TTIs in the region have registred program 4
below 70% of full-fledged TTIs in the region have registered program 0
B.10.A.5. Health Care Related weighted score 8
100% of full-fledged TTIs in the region have registered program 8
at least 70% of full-fledged TTIs in the region have registred program/s 4
below 70% of full-fledged TTIs in the region have registered program/s 0
B.10.A.6 Agricultural Surplus weighted score 8
at least 70% of full-fledged Ills in the region have registred program/s 4

B.10.A.7 Produce Organic Concoctions weighted score 8
at least 70% of full-fledged TTIs in the region have registred program/s 4
B.10.B. Establishment of Mini-organic Farms by TTIs weighted score 6
100% of full-fledged TTIs in the region have established mini organic farms 6
Not all full-fledged TTIs in the region have established mini organic farms 0
B.10.C. Establishment of PTCs for those provinces without PTC weighted score 8
All provincial/district provisional training teams have migrated to full fledged PTCs/DTCs 8
Not all provincial/district provisional training teams have migrated to full fledged PTCs/DTCs 0
B.10.D. Establishment of OFW Desk weighted score 6
All field units in the region have established OFW desk, with TESDA focal persons and OFW
6
representative
Not all field units in the region have established OFW desk, with TESDA focal persons and OFW
0
representative
B.10.E. "Meetings with the Association of Barangay Captains (ABCs) weighted score 8
All POs in the region have attended at least 7 monthly ABCs 8
4
at least 70% of the POs in the region have attended at least 4 but not more than 6 monthly ABCs
2
at least 70% of the POs in the region have attended at least 2 but not more than 3 monthly ABCs
B.10.F. Conduct of WET Forum weighted score 6
The region has conducted a regional TVET Forum 6
No regional WET Forum was conducted 0
100% of budget utilized 25
79% and below of budget utilized 0
C.2. Implementation of Agency Action Plan and Status of Implementation (AAPSI) on the Prior
Years Audit Recommendation 25
80% acted upon (either partially or fully implemented)
100% acted upon (either partially or fully implemented) 25
79% and below acted upon (either partially or fully implemented) 0
C.3. Green Practices
15
100% implementation of plans and projects related to Green Practices
100% implementation of plans and projects related to Green Practices 15 15
51-99% implementation of plans and projects related to Green Practices 8
50% and below implementation of plans and projects related to Green Practices 0
C.4.A. Employees who have attended SDP have implemented their RE-Entry Plans as scheduled
weighted score 20
100% of Employees who attended SDP have implemented their Re-Entry Plans as scheduled 20
75%- 99% of Employees who attended SDP have implemented their Re-Entry Plans as scheduled 10
51- 74% of Employees who attended SDP have implemented their Re-Entry Plans as scheduled 5
50% and below of Employees who attended SDP have implemented their Re-Entry Plans as
0
scheduled
C.4.B. Training Opportunities to staff provided for CY 2019 weighted score 15
100% of Employees were provided with training opportunities 15
75%-99% of Employees were provided with training opportunities 8
74% and below of Employees were provided with training opportunities 0

C.5.A. Model Employee for Category I Position 8
C.5.A.1. Participation weighted score 4
The Region submitted nominees for Category I 4
The Region did not submit nominees for Category I 0
C.5.A.2. Awards received weighted score 4
The Region has received recognition/award at national level 4
The Region did not receive award/recognition at national level 0
C.S.B. Model Employee for Category II Position 8
C.5.B.1. Participation weighted score 4
The Region submitted nominees for Category II 4
The Region did not submit nominees for Category II 0
C.5.B.2. Awards received weighted score 4
C.5.C. Model Employee for Category Ill Position 9
C.5.C.1. Participation weighted score 4
The Region submitted nominees for Category III 4
The Region did not submit nominees for Category Ill 0
C.5.C.2. Awards received weighted score 5
D.1. Timeliness, Consistency and Accuracy 50
Reports are accurate and submitted consistently and on time 50
Reports are accurate and submitted consistently but not on time 25
Reports are not accurate and are not submitted on time 0
A Communication Plan was prepared and fully implemented. 40
Number of communication activities is the same as or above the average number of reported
activities (guestings, posts, radio reports, etc.) of the regional group.
A Communication Plan was not prepared but communications activities were fully implemented. 35
activities (guestings, posts, radio reports, etc.) of the regional group.
A Communication Plan was prepared but communications activities were not fully implemented. 25
Number of communication activities is below the average number of reported activities (guestings,
posts, radio reports, etc.) of the regional group.
A Communication Plan was not prepared and communications activities were not fully 20
implemented.
posts, radio reports, etc.) of the regional group.
A Communication Plan was prepared but no communications activities were implemented 5
No Communication Plan was prepared and no communications activities were implemented 0
GRAND TOTAL 1000
Annex B - Criteria for Gating Probinsya Award
Requirement Weighted Store Point Value

The Province has no personnel with administrative case filed with TESDA Administrative and
40
Complaints Committee (ACC)
The Province has at least one administrative case filed with TESDA Administrative and Complaints
0
Committee (ACC)
• Cronyism
• Confidentiality
• Post-employment
weighted score 30
weighted score 30
A.5. Compliance to PhiIGEPS requirements weighted score 30
The provincial office is compliant to APCPI 10
The provincial office is not compliant to APCPI 0
Annex B - Criteria for Galing Probinsya Award

6.1.A. Global Competitiveness 15
6.1.A.1. Reintegration of OFWs weighted score 7
The provincial office has at least 3-5 programs conducted 7
The provincial office has less than 3-5 programs conducted 0
The provincial office has at least 3 programs conducted 8
The provincial office has less than 3 programs conducted 0
B.1.6. Social Equity 30
13.1.6.1. Skills Training for Drug Dependents weighted score 6
B.1.13.2. Skills Training for Inmates and their Families weighted score 6
6.1.13.3. Special Skills Programs for IPs weighted score 6
6.1.6.4. Expanded Training Program for Women and PWDs weighted score 6
B.1.B.5. Training Programs for Other Specials Clients weighted score 6
indicators
260
B.2.A. Active TESD Committees weighted score 10
B.2.B. Number of Programs Registered weighted score 10
6.2.C. Process Cycle Time for CTPR Issuance (7days) weighted score 15
6.2.D. Number of Programs Audited weighted score 15
6.2.E. 85% compliance of TVET Programs to TESDA, Industry, Standards, and requirements weighted score 10
The percentage of compliance to audit breaches is at 1% and below 10
The percentage of compliance to audit breaches is at more than 1% 0
B.2.F. Number of skilled workers assessed for certification weighted score 15
6.2.G. Number of TVET Trainers weighted score 15
B.2.H. Number of Assessors weighted score 15
6.2.1. Number of Assessment Centers weighted score 15

B.2.1. 86% of WET graduates that undergo assessment for certification weighted score 15
B.2.K. 90% of skilled workers issued with Certification within 7 days of their application weighted score 15
B.2.L. Number of Scholarship Programs enrolled weighted score 35
B.2.M. Number of Scholarship Programs graduates weighted score 35
B.2.N. Number of TTIs enrollees weighted score 10
B.2.0. Number of TTIs graduates weighted score 10
B.2.P. WET enrolment and graduates by delivery mode- institution-based weighted score 5
B.2.Q. TVET enrolment and graduates by delivery mode- enterprise-based weighted score 5
B.2.R. TVET enrolment and graduates by delivery mode- community-based weighted score 5
B.2.S. Implementation of WCO weighted score 5
The Province participated in all competitions (PNSC, ASC, and World Skills Competition) 5
The Province participated in PNSC 3
The Province did not participate in any of the competition 0
The Province received award/recognition at the national level 10
The Province did not receive award/recognition 0
The Province received award/recognition at the international level 10
The Province did not receive award/recognition 0
B.4.A. TESDA Idol (Wage-employed) 15
The Province participated in TESDA Idol (Wage-employed) 5
The Province did not participate in TESDA Idol (Wage-employed) 0
The Province did not receive award/recognition at the national level 0
B.4.B. TESDA Idol (Self-employed) 15
The Province participated in TESDA Idol (self-employed) 5
The Province did not participate in TESDA Idol (self-employed) 0
Annex B - Criteria for Ealing Probinsya Award

B.4.C. Tagsa nay 15
B.4.C.1. Participation weighted score 5
The Province participated in Tagsanay Awards 5
The Province did not participate in Tagsanay Awards 0
6.4.C.2. Awards received weighted score 10
B.4.D. Kabalikat Awards 15
6.4.D.1. Participation weighted score 5
The Province participated in Kabalikat Awards 5
The Province did not participate in Kabalikat Awards 0
B.4.D.2. Awards received weighted score 10
B.S. Accreditation Awards (STAR Program, APACC) 40
The province nominated TVI/s for APACC accreditation 5
The province did not nominate any TVI/s for APACC accreditation 0
The nominated TVI/s of the province received APACC accreditation 10
The nominated TVI/s of the province did not receive APACC accreditation 0
B.S.B. System for TVET Accreditation and Recognition (STAR) Program 25
6.5.6.1. Participation weighted score 5
The Province participated in STAR Program 5
The Province did not participate in STAR Program 0
8.5.6.2. Awards received weighted score 20
The province received at least one THREE STAR Level Award 20
The province received at least one TWO STAR Level Award 10
The province received at least one ONE STAR Level Award 5
The province did not receive a STAR Level Award 0
B.E. Enterprise-based programs implemented
• To be measured in terms of resources and increase in program outputs 15
• Dual Training System (DTS) and Apprenticeship/Learnership Programs
Both Dual Training System (DTS), Apprenticeship programs implemented 15
The Dual Training System (DTS) or Apprenticeship program is implemented 10
The Dual Training System (DTS) and Apprenticeship program are not implemented 0
B.7. Partnerships forged and implemented
• to be measured in terms of resources and increase in program outputs 15
• CSR — partnership with private companies
For Large Provinces: Partnerships with three (3) or more industries / private companies and
with continuing tie-ups for the last two (2) years with the same industries/companies;
For Medium Provinces: Partnerships with two (2) or more industries / private companies
and with continuing tie - ups for the last two (2) years with the same industries/companies; 15
For Small Provinces: Partnership with more than one (1) industry / private company and
with continuing tie-ups for the last two (2) years with the same industry/company
For Large Provinces: Partnerships with less than three (3) industries / private companies and
with continuing tie-ups for the last two (2) years with the same industries/companies;
For Medium Provinces: Partnerships with less than two (2) industries / private companies
and with continuing tie - ups for the last two (2) years with the same industries/companies; 10
For Small Provinces: Partnership with one (1) industry / private company and with
continuing tie-ups for the last two (2) years with the same industry/company;

For Large Provinces: Partnerships with less than three (3) industries / private companies and
with continuing tie-ups for less than two (2) years with the same industries/companies:
For Medium Provinces: Partnerships with less than two (2) industries / private companies
and with continuing tie-ups for less than two (2) years with the same industries/companies; 5
For Small Provinces: Partnership with one (1) industry / private company and with
continuing tie-ups for less than two (2) years with the same industries/companies:
No partnership forged. 0
30
B.B. Best Practices and Innovations (engagement of the creation or design of new process or techniques)
The province is engaged in the creation or design of new processes or techniques in the services
30
offered and is implemented by the provincial office
The province is engaged in the creation or design of new processes or techniques in the services
15
offered but is not implemented by the provincial office
There are no creations or designs of new processes or techniques 0
B.9.A. Number of Active IQA Lead Auditor/s weighted score 8
The province has more than more than one (1) active IQA Lead Auditors/Auditors 8
The province has one (1) active IQA Lead Auditors/ Auditors 4
The province has no active IQA Lead Auditors/ Auditors 0
B.9.B. Timely Submission of Reports/Documents (e.g. IQA reports, Action Catalog, NAP) weighted score 6
The province submitted report/doc ahead of deadline 6
The province submitted report/docs on set deadline 3
The province submitted report/doc after set deadline 0
B.9.C. Percentage of Personnel Attendance to Central Office initiated QMS-related training
weighted score 6
programs
>80% of provincial personnel attended QMS related training programs 6
40% to 80% of provincial personnel attended QMS related training programs 3
<40% of provincial personnel attended QMS related training programs 0
*Plus (1) Point for ROPO initiated QMS related training programs of personnel 1
B.10. Compliance to Secretary's Directives 85
B.10.A. Program Registration
Note: Included are those TTIs that were recognized until the 1st semester of CY2020 and have the 51
capacity to comply on the various directives on program registration.
B.10.A.1. Agri-Related Courses weighted score 5
100% of full-fledged TTIs in the province have registered and implemented program/s 5
2
100% of full-fledged TTIs in the province have registered program/s but not all have implementation
Not all full-fledged His in the province have registered program/s 0
B.10.A.2. Construction Related Courses weighted score 5
100% of full-fledged TTIs in the province have registered and implemented program/s 5
100% of full-fledged TTIs in the proviince have registered program/s but not all have
2
implementation
Not all full-fledged TTIs in the province have registered program/s 0
100% of full-fledged Ills in the province have registered and implemented program/s 5
2
100% of full-fledged His in the province have registered program/s but not all have implementation
Not all full-fledged TTIs in the province have registered program/s 0
100% of full-fledged His in the province have registered and implemented program 12
8
100% of full-fledged TTIs in the province have registered program but not all have implementation
at least 70% of full-fledged TTIs in the province have registred program 4
below 70% of full-fledged His in the province have registered program 0
Annex B - Criteria for Gating Probinsya Award
B.10.A.5. Health Care Related weighted score 8
100% of full-fledged TTIs in the province have registered program/s 8
at least 70% of full-fledged TTIs in the province have registred program/s 4
below 70% of full-fledged TTIs in the province have registered program/s 0
B.10.A.6 Agricultural Surplus weighted score 8
100% of full-fledged Ills in the province have registered program/s 8
below 70% of full-fledged TTIs in the province have registered program/s 0
B.10.A.7 Produce Organic Concoctions weighted score 8
100% of full-fledged TTIs in the province have registered program/s 8
below 70% of full-fledged Ills in the province have registered program/s 0
All TTIs in the province have established mini organic farms 6
Not all TTIs in the province have established mini organic farms 0
B.10.C. Establishment of PTCs for those provinces without PTC weighted score 8
All provincial/district provisional training teams have migrated to full fledged PTCs/DTCs 8
Not all provincial/district provisional training teams have migrated to full fledged PTCs/DTCs 0
B.10.D. Establishment of OFW Desk weighted score 6
The PO has established an OFW desk, assigned ESDA focal persons and identified OFW
6
representative
0
The PO has not established an OFW desk, assigned TESDA focal persons and OFW representative
B.10.E. "Meetings with the Association of Barangay Captains (ABCs) weighted score 8
The PO has attended at least 7 monthly ABCs 8
the PO has attended at least 4-6 monthly ABCs 4
the PO has attended at least 2-3 monthly ABCs 2
B.10.F. Conduct of TVET Forum weighted score 6
The PO has conducted a provincial TVET forum 6
No provincial TVET forum was conducted 0
C._Adm inigrativeand Supp_ort Seri/Aces 125
15
100% implementation of plans and projects related to Green Practices 15 15
50% and below implementation of plans and projects related to Green Practices 0
weighted score 20
0
scheduled
Annex B - Criteria for Galing Prob► insya Award

74% and below of Employees were provided with training opportunities 0
C.5.A. Model Employee for Category I Position 8
The Province submitted nominees for Category I 4
The Province did not submit nominees for Category I 0
The Province has received recognition/award at national level 4
The Province did not receive award/recognition at national level 0
C.5.B. Model Employee for Category II Position 8
C.5.6.1. Participation weighted score 4
The Province submitted nominees for Category II 4
The Province did not submit nominees for Category II 0
C.5.6.2. Awards received weighted score 4
C.5.C. Model Employee for Category Ill Position 9
C.5.C.1. Participation weighted score 4
The Province submitted nominees for Category III 4
The Province did not submit nominees for Category III 0
C.5.C.2. Awards received weighted score 5
D. Re .ortin• Efficienc 111/ IL
D.1. Timeliness,
Timeliness, Consistency and Accuracy SO
A Communication Plan was prepared and fully implemented. 40
activities (guestings, posts, radio reports, etc.) of the provincial group.
A Communication Plan was not prepared but communications activities were fully implemented. 35
activities (guestings, posts, radio reports, etc.) of the provincial group.
A Communication Plan was prepared but communications activities were not fully implemented. 25
posts, radio reports, etc.) of the provincial group.
A Communication Plan was not prepared and communications activities were not fully 20
implemented.
posts, radio reports, etc.) of the provincial group.
GRAND TOTAL 1000
Annex C - Criteria for Best Training Institution Award
Requirement Weighted score Point Value

The TTI has no personnel with administrative case filed with TESDA Administrative and Complaints
40
Committee (ACC)
The TTI has at least one administrative case filed with TESDA Administrative and Complaints
0
Committee (ACC)
• Cronyism
• Confidentiality
• Post-employment
weighted score 30
weighted score 30
A.S. Compliance to PhiIGEPS requirements weighted score 30
The TTI is compliant to APCPI 10
The TTI is not compliant to APCPI 0

B.1.A. Global Competitiveness 26
B.1.A.1. Reintegration of OFWs weighted score 8
The TTI has at least two (2) programs conducted 8
The TTI has less than two (2) programs conducted 0
The TTI has at least 2 programs implemented 18
The TTI has less than 2 programs implemented 0
B.1.B. Social Equity 34
B.1.13.1. UAQTEA Scholarship Program weighted score 10
TTI FULLY implemented UAQTEA 2018 Program (Qualification Maps) 10
TTI PARTIALLY implemented UAQTEA 2018 Program (Qualification Maps) 5
TTI not implemented UAQTEA 2018 Program (Qualification Maps) 0
B.1.B.2. Skills Training for Drug Dependents weighted score 6
The TTI has at least 5 programs conducted 6
The TTI has less than 5 programs conducted 0
B.1.B.3. Skills Training for Inmates and their Families weighted score 6
B.1.B.4. Special Skills Programs for IPs weighted score 6
B.1.13.5. Expanded Training Program for Women and PWDs weighted score 6
B.1.C. Career Guidance Program 30
B.1.C.1. Implementation Profiling weighted score 15
100% of TTI enrollees profiled 15
75% - 99.99% of TTI enrollees profiled 10
50% - 74.99% of TTI enrollees profiled 5
49.99% and below of TTI enrollees profiled 0
B.1.C.2. Referred Graduates for Possible Employment weighted score 15
100% of TTI graduates referred 15
75% - 99.99% of TTI graduates referred 10
50% - 74.99% of TTI graduates referred 5
49.99% and below of TTI graduates referred 0
indicators
255
B.2.A. WET Trainers Development Programs - TM Level II weighted score 20
The TTI had at least one (1) certified trainer in TM Level It (any CoCs) 10
The TTI does not have certified Trainer in TM Level II (any CoCs) 0
B.2.B. WET Trainers Development Programs - Industry Immersion weighted score 20
The TTI had send at least 2 trainers for industry immersion 10
The TTI had not send trainers for industry immersion 0
B.2.C. Percentage of TTI Trainers are Accredited National Competency Assessors weighted score 15
70% of the TTI trainers are accredited National Competency Assessors 15
50-69.99% of the TTI trainers are accredited National Competency Assessors 10
49.99% and below of the TTI trainers are accredited National Competency Assessors 0
B.2.D. Percentage of TTI registered Programs (WTR) are Accredited Assessment Center weighted score 15
50% of the TTI trainers are accredited National Competency Assessors 15
30-49.99% of the TTI trainers are accredited National Competency Assessors 10
29.99% and below of the TTI trainers are accredited National Competency Assessors 0

B.2.E. Percentage of TTI Graduates in WTR Programs assessed weighted score 25
100% of the TTI graduates assessed 25
75% - 99.99% of the TTI graduates assessed 15
24.99% and below of the TTI graduates assessed 0
B.2.F. Percentage of graduates in programs with training regulations assessed, certified weighted score 15
85% and above of the TTI graduates assessed, certified 15
75% - 84.99% of the TTI graduates assessed, certified 10
50% - 74.99% of the TTI graduates assessed, certified 0
B.2.G. Graduates of TTI - Institution-based weighted score 35
The accomplishment rate based on set target is 75% - 99.99% 20
B.2.H. Graduates of TTI - Enterprise-based weighted score 35
B.2.I. Graduates of TTI - Community-based weighted score 30
B.2.1. Number of Mobile Training Programs Implemented weighted score 15
The TTI implemented at least 10 Mobile Training Programs 15
The TTI implemented 5-9 Mobile Training Programs 10
The TTI implemented 1-4 Mobile Training Programs 5
The TTI did not implement Mobile Training Program 0
6.2.K. Percentage of TTI graduates trained in Entrepreneurship Training Program weighted score 15
80% and up of the TTI graduates trained on entrepreneurship training program 15
50% - 79.99% of the TTI graduates trained on entrepreneurship training program 10
25% - 49.99% of the TTI graduates trained on entrepreneurship training program 5
24.99% and below of the TTI graduates trained on entrepreneurship training program 0
B.2.L. Preparation of Institutional Development Plan (IDP) 15 15
The TTI prepared and submitted its IDP to the Regional Office 15
The TTI did not prepare its IDP 0
The TTI participated in all competitions (ASC and World Skills Competition) 5
The TTI participated in PNSC 3
The TTI did not participate in any of the competition 0
The TTI received award/recognition at the national level 10
The TTI did not receive award/recognition 0
The TTI received award/recognition at the international level 10
The TTI did not receive award/recognition 0
B.4. Institutional Awards - Tagsanay Awards 60
The TTI participated in Tagsanay Awards 5
The TTI did not participate in Tagsanay Awards 0
B.4.B. Awards received weighted score 40
The TTI received major award/recognition at the national level 40
The TTI received minor/special award/recognition at the national level 20
The TTI did not receive award/recognition at the national level 0

B.S. Accreditation Awards (STAR Program, APACC) 40
6.5.A.1. Participation weighted score 5
The TTI applied for APACC accreditation 5
The TTI did not apply for APACC accreditation 0
The TTI received APACC-Gold accreditation 20
The TTI received APACC-Silver accreditation 10
The TTI received APACC-Bronze accreditation 5
The nominated TVI/s of the region did not receive APACC accreditation 0
B.S.B. System for TVET Accreditation and Recognition (STAR) Program weighted score 25
B.5.B.1. Participation 5 5
The TTI participated in STAR Program 5
The TTI did not participate in STAR Program 0
The TTI received at least one THREE STAR Level Award 20
The TTI received at least one TWO STAR Level Award 10
The TTI received at least one ONE STAR Level Award 5
The TTI did not receive a STAR Level Award 0
B.6. Partnerships forged and implemented (The max. score conferred to the applicant must not exceed
30
30 points)
The Dual Training System (DTS) or Dual Training Program (DTP) is implemented 30
Curriculum of TTI program offering reviewed and updated to current technology and industry
20
practices standards
TTI trainers undergone industry immersion with partner companies/enterprises 15
The Dual Training System (DTS) or Dual Training Program (DTP) is not implemented 0
30
B.7. Best Practices and Innovations (engagement of the creation or design of new process or techniques)
The TTI is engaged in the creation or design of new processes or techniques in the services offered
30
and is implemented by the TTI
The TTI is engaged in the creation or design of new processes or techniques in the services offered
15
but is not implemented by the TTI
There are no creations or designs of new processes or techniques 0
B.S. Compliance to Secretary's Directives 65
B.10.A. Program Registration 60
B.10.A.1. Agri-Related Courses weighted score 5
The TTI has registered program/s and has implemented the program/s 5
The TTI has registered program/s but no implementation 2
The TTI has no registered program/s 0
6.10.A.2. Construction Related Courses weighted score 5
The TTI has registered program/s and has implemented the program/s 5
The TTI has registered program/s but no implementation 2
The TTI has registered program and has implemented the program 5
The TTI has registered program but no implementation 2
The TTI has no registered program 0
The TTI has registered program and has implemented the program 15
The TTI has registered program but no implementation 10
The TTI has no registered program 0
6.10.A.5. Health Care Related weighted score 10
The TTI has registered program/s 10

6.10.A.6 Agricultural Surplus weighted score 10
6.10.A.7 Produce Organic Concoctions weighted score 10
The 111 has no registered program/s 0
The TTI have established mini organic farms 5
The TTI have no established mini organic farms 0
15
100% implementation of plans and projects related to Green Practices 15
50.99% and below implementation of plans and projects related to Green Practices 0
weighted score 20
0
scheduled
74.99% and below of Employees were provided with training opportunities 0
C.S. Model Employee Awards 25
C.S.A. Model Employee for Category I Position 12
The TTI submitted nominees for Category I 5
The TTI did not submit nominees for Category I 0
The TTI has received recognition/award at national level 7
The TTI did not receive award/recognition at national level 0
C.S.B. Model Employee for Category II Position weighted score 13
C.5.6.1. Participation 5 5
The TTI submitted nominees for Category II 5
The TTI did not submit nominees for Category II 0
C.5.B.2. Awards received weighted score 8
The TTI has received recognition/award at national level 8
The TTI did not receive award/recognition at national level 0

_.
...i..-7-traiar/01.111111&
D.1. Timeliness, Consistency and Accuracy SO
E. Social Marketing and Advocacy v v- -, Ali nt a .mmr -7-- mow
E.1. Communication Program (OPCR) 40
A Communication Plan was prepared and fully implemented (with average or above average number of 40
reported activities, guestings, posts, radio reports, etc.)
A Communication Plan was not prepared but communications activities were fully implemented (with 35
average or above average number of reported activities, guestings, posts, etc.)
A Communication Plan was prepared but communications activities were not fully implemented (with 25
below average number of reported activities, guestings, posts, etc.)
A Communication Plan was not prepared and communications activities were not fully implemented 20
(with below average number of reported activities, guestings, posts, etc.)
GRAND TOTAL 1000

TESDA Organizational Excellence Awards Guidelines

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

TESDA Organizational Excellence Awards Guidelines

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

TESDA CIRCULAR

Subject: Implementing Guidelines for the TESDA Page 1 of 11 page/s

The TESDA-PRAISE aims to encourage, recognize, and reward accomplishments and

Beginning in 2019, TESDA has organized and implemented the Organizational

II. Program Description

The TESDA Organizational Excellence Awards (TOEA) is a component of TESDA-

The Organizational Awards include the following:

• Best Regional Office (BRO) Award

• Galing Probinsya Award

• Best Training Institution Award

The TESDA organizational Awards shall seek to:

IV. Scope and Coverage

SMALL MEDIUM LARGE

SMALL MEDIUM LARGE

Agusan del Norte Surigao del Sur

5. The TTIs shall be grouped as follows:

Good Governance Indicators such as:

VI. Mechanics of Implementation

A. BRO and Galing Probinsya Award

B. Best Training Institution Award

A. Best Regional Office (BRO) and Galing Probinsya Award

2. For BRO Award:

B. Best Training Institution Award

1. The TWG members shall deliberate on the nominees (Regional Office,

2. The Third Party evaluators shall review the records/documents submitted by

3. The Third Party is a three-member team composed of representatives from

5. The National Board of Judges, shall be composed of seven (7) members:

a. Assistant Secretary — Department of Trade and Industry (DTI)

IX. Awards and Recognition

Approval of the Implementing May 17, 2021 Secretary/Director

Dissemination of Implementing May 18, 2021 Secretariat

Review and deliberation of June 25, 2021 Third Party

Wide dissemination of this Circular to all concerned is hereby enjoined.

Requirement Weighted Score Point Value

Requirement Weighted Score Point Value

Requirement Weighted Score Point Value

Requirement Weighted Score Point Value

Requirement Weighted Score Point Value

Requirement Weighted Score Point Value

Requirement Weighted Score Point Value

Requirement Weighted Store Point Value

Requirement Weighted Score Point Value

Requirement Weighted Score Point Value

Requirement Weighted Score Point Value

Requirement Weighted Score Point Value

Requirement Weighted Score Point Value

Requirement Weighted score Point Value

Requirement Weighted score Point Value

Requirement Weighted score Point Value

Requirement Weighted score Point Value

Requirement Weighted score Point Value

Requirement Weighted score Point Value

You might also like