TESDA Circular No. 127-2020

TESDA CIRCULAR
Subject: Implementing Guidelines for the 2019 TESDA Page 1 of 10 page/s

Organizational Awards Number _la, series of 2020
Date Issued:
Effectivity: As Indicated Supersedes:
27 October 2020
In view of TESDA's continuous drive for quality management and excellence in public
service, TESDA shall implement the 2019 TESDA Organizational Awards with the following
implementing guidelines.
I. Rationale
TESDA is mandated to provide relevant, accessible, high quality, and efficient technical
education and skills development. It is a quality organization steered by educated public
servants. Its drive for quality and excellence is evidenced by the ISO 9001:2008 it has
sustained since 2012 and currently the ISO 9001:2015 Certification. TESDA likewise
garnered the Philippine Quality Award Commitment level.
The TESDA management recognizes the efforts particularly of the Field Offices who
have diligently worked hard to pursue the varied and arduous tasks and responsibilities
through the TESDA Program on Awards and Incentives for Service Excellence (TESDA-
PRAISE).
The TESDA-PRAISE aims to encourage, recognize, and reward accomplishments and

other personal efforts of employees on a continuing basis.
Beginning in 2019, TESDA has organized and implemented the Organizational Awards
to recognize the accomplishments of the Regional, Provincial Offices and the TESDA
training institutions as embodied in the TESDA-PRAISE.
II. Program Description
The TESDA Organizational Awards is a component of TESDA-PRAISE which

adheres to the principle of providing incentives and awards based on performance,
culture of innovativeness and excellence. The awards incentives are designed in
such a way that there will be "building blocks" or sub-components for every major
category that will be able to align efforts and accomplishment of the whole
organization.
The Organizational Awards include the following:
• Best Regional Office (BRO) Award

The Best Regional Office (BRO) Award shall be given to the Regional Office
that excelled in the effective supervision, coordination, integration and
implementation and monitoring of TVET programs within their region. It shall
also be in line with TESDA's commitment and thrust as a quality-assured and
corrupt-free organization.
TESDA CIRCULAR
Organizational Awards Number in , series of 2020
Date Issued:
27 October 2020
• Galing Probinsya Award
The Galing Probinsya Award shall be given to the Provincial Office that excelled
in the effective supervision, coordination, integration and implementation and
monitoring of TVET programs within their province.
• Best Training Institution Award

The Best Training Institution Award shall be given to the Training Institution that
excelled in the effective administration and implementation of TVET programs
offered by their training institution.
III. Objectives
The TESDA organizational Awards shall seek to:

1. To evaluate the performance of the Regional Offices, Provincial Offices and
TESDA Training Institutions;
2. To identify areas of strengths and weaknesses which shall serve as bases for
strategies and appropriate interventions;
3. To recognize good practices and innovations; and
4. To provide incentives and recognition for organizational excellence
IV. Scope and Coverage
1. The Best Regional Office and Galing Probinsya Awards shall cover the
performance of the Regional Offices and Provincial Offices;
2. The Best Training Institution Awards shall cover TESDA Training Institutions
(TTIs);
3. The Award shall cover regional, provincial and TTIs performance for the
preceding year;
4. The regions and provinces shall be grouped into small, medium and large,
based on the share of overall outputs:
a. Regional Grouping
SMALL MEDIUM LARGE

(7 Regions) (6 Regions) (4 Regions)
CAR Region I Region NCR
Region II Region V Region III
Region IV-B Region VI Region IV-A
Region VIII Region X Region VII
Region IX Region XI
CARAGA Region XII
BARMM
TESDA CIRCULAR
Organizational Awards Number Ii , series of 2020
Date Issued:
27 October 2020
The sizes of regions were based on 8 criteria — 2018 Population, Number of
Legislative Divisions (17th Congress), Labor Force Population (October 2019), 2018
Gross Regional Domestic Product, Number of Registered Programs (as of December
2019), Number of Accredited Qualifications of Assessment Centers (as of December
2019), Number of TV's (as of December 2019), and Number of Establishments (2018
List).
b. Provincial Grouping
SMALL MEDIUM LARGE

Region
(41 Provinces) (27 Provinces) (18 Provinces)
Pasay-Makati CaMaNaVa
Manila
NCR MuntiParLasTaPat
PaMaMaRiSan
Quezon City
Abra Benguet
Apayao
CAR Ifugao
Kalinga
Mt. Province
Ilocos Norte Pangasinan
I (locos Sur
La Union
Batanes Cagayan
II Nueva Viscaya Isabela
Quirino
Aurora Pampanga Bulacan
III Bataan Tarlac Nueva Ecija
Zambales
Batangas
Cavite
IV-A Laguna
Quezon
Rizal
Marinduque Oriental Mindoro
Occidental Mindoro Palawan
IV-B
Romblon
TESDA CIRCULAR
Organizational Awards Number , series of 2020
Date Issued:
27 October 2020
Camarines Norte Albay

Catanduanes Camarines Sur
V
Masbate
Sorsogon
Aklan Iloilo Negros Occidental
Antique
VI
Capiz
Guimaras
Siquijor Bohol Cebu
VII
Negros Oriental
Biliran Leyte
Eastern Samar
VIII Northern Samar
Samar
Southern Leyte
Zamboanga Zamboanga Del
IX Sibugay Norte
Zamboanga Del Sur
Camiguin Bukidnon Misamis Oriental
X Misamis Lanao del Norte
Occidental
Compostela Davao City/Davao
Valley/Davao de del Sur
XI Oro
Davao del Norte
Davao Oriental
North Cotabato
Sarangani
XII
South Cotabato
Sultan Kudarat
Agusan del Norte Surigao del Sur

CARAG Agusan del Sur
A Dinagat Island
Surigao del Norte
Basilan Lanao del Sur

BARM
Sulu Maguindanao
M
Tawi-Tawi
TESDA CIRCULAR
Organizational Awards Number Iv , series of 2020
Date Issued:
27 October 2020
The sizes of provinces were based on 7 criteria — 2018 Population, Income
Classification, Number of Legislative Divisions (17th Congress), Number of
Registered Programs (as of December 2019), Number of Accredited Qualifications of
Assessment Centers (as of December 2019), Number of TVIs (as of December
2019), and Number of Establishments (2018 List).
5. The TTIs shall be grouped as follows:

a. Provincial Training Centers (PTCs)
b. Regional and Specialized Training Centers; and
c. TESDA Administered Schools
V Eligibility for Organizational Awards
To be eligible for the Award, the Regional and Provincial Offices, TTIs should have
complied with the following:
Good Governance Indicators such as:

o Adherence to Transparency Seal requirements as applicable;
o 100% Submission of Statement of Assets, Liabilities, and Networth of officials
and staff; and
o Posting of Citizen's Charter in conspicuous areas such as entrances,
administrative offices, etc.
All Regional, Provincial Offices, and TTIs that meet all of the above-mentioned
requirements shall be included in the evaluation based on the criteria.
VI. Mechanics of Implementation
1. The Regional and Provincial Offices and TTIs shall be evaluated based on the
following criteria:
A. BRO and Galing Probinsya Award

Good Governance Measures 190 points
Implementation of TESDA Programs 595 points
Administrative and Support Services (PBB Indicators) 125 points
Reporting Efficiency 50 points
Social Media Marketing and Advocacy 40 points
TOTAL 1000 points
TESDA CIRCULAR
Organizational Awards Number n , series of 2020
Date Issued:
27 October 2020
B. Best Training Institution Award
Good Governance Measures 190 points
Implementation of TESDA Programs 595 points
Administrative and Support Services (PBB Indicators) 125 points
Reporting Efficiency 50 points
Social Media Marketing and Advocacy 40 points
TOTAL 1000 points
2. The Secretariat shall gather and process the information to come up with the
initial computation of the scores of each Regional Office based on the set criteria.
The evaluation shall be based on documents submitted to the Central Office as
required. Other evidence shall be validated on-site, as necessary.
3. The Regional Office shall gather and process information to come up with the
initial computation of the scores of each Provincial Office and TTIs based on the
set criteria. All evaluation results shall be submitted to the Technical Working
Group (TWG) on TESDA Organizational Awards. The Regional Office shall select
the Galing Probinsya and Best Training Institution nominees to be endorsed to
the TWG who will decide on the final awardees per group.
4. Failure to submit nominees for Galing Probinsya and Best Training Institution
Awards on set deadline shall be automatically disqualified.
5. The region/s and province/s with the least number of revoked programs over the
total number of registered programs shall receive additional ten (10) points to the
over-all points garnered.
6. The regions, provinces and TTIs shall be ranked according to points garnered.
7. There shall be one awardee for each group of regions, provinces, and TTIs. The
awardee should have a score of at least 500 points and no zero score in any
major criterion.
8. Special Awards shall be given to regions, provinces, and TTIs with Best Green
Practices, and Best Innovations.
9. The awardees shall receive a Plaque of Recognition and cash award, subject to
Civil Service Commission approved TESDA-PRAISE guidelines.
TESDA CIRCULAR
Organizational Awards Number 1.ri , series of 2020
Date Issued:
27 October 2020
VII. Criteria
A. Best Regional Office (BRO) and Galing Probinsya Award

1. The following are the major requirements with their corresponding point values:
Point
Requirement
Value
A. Good Governance Measures 190
A.1. Compliance to Zero Corruption Policy 40
A.2. Compliance to the TESDA Code of Conduct and Ethical Standards 30
A.3. Customer Satisfaction Results 30
A.4. Compliance to Commission on Audit Rules and Regulations 30
A.S. Compliance to PhilGEPS requirements 30
A.6. Liquidation of Cash Advances 20
A.7. Compliance to Agency Procurement Compliance Performance
10
Indicator (APCPI)
B. Implementation of TESDA Programs 595
B.1. Implementation of Priority Programs 45
B.2. Accomplishment based on the Government Appropriation Act
260
(GAA) and TESDA OPCR indicators
B.3. Participation and Awards from Skills Competition 25
B.4. Institutional Awards 60
B.S. Accreditation Awards 40
B.6. Enterprise-based programs implemented 15
B.7. Partnerships forged and implemented 15
B.B. Best Practices and Innovations 30
B.9. Quality Management System Implementation 20
B.10. Compliance to the Directives of the Secretary 85
C. Administrative and Support Services 125
C.1. Budget Utilization Rate (BUR) 25
C.2. Implementation of Agency Action Plan and Status of
Implementation (AAPSI) on the Prior Years Audit 25
Recommendation
C.3. Green Practices 15
C.4. Staff Development Program 35
C.S. Model Employee Awards 25
D. Reporting Efficiency 50
D.1. Timeliness, Consistency and Accuracy
E. Social Marketing and Advocacy 40
E.1. Communication Program (OPCR)
GRAND TOTAL 1000
TESDA CIRCULAR
Organizational Awards Number In , series of 2020
Date Issued:
27 October 2020
The details of the above-mentioned requirements are in the Scoring Guides

attached herewith as Annexes A and B.
2. For BRO Award, a demerit of 10 points from the total score shall be applied if
there are findings found during ISO 9001:2015 TUV SUD audit which were
not addressed.
B. Best Training Institution Award
The following are the major requirements with their corresponding point value:
Point
Requirement
Value
A. Good Governance Measures 190
A.1. Compliance to Zero Corruption Policy 40
A.2. Compliance to the TESDA Code of Conduct and Ethical Standards 30
A.3. Customer Satisfaction Results 30
A.4. Compliance to Commission on Audit Rules and Regulations 30
A.5. Compliance to PhiIGEPS requirements 30
A.6. Liquidation of Cash Advances 20
A.7. Compliance to Agency Procurement Compliance Performance
10
Indicator (APCPI)
B. Implementation of TESDA Programs 595
B.2. Accomplishment based on the Government Appropriation Act
255
(GAA) and TESDA OPCR indicators
B.3. Participation and Awards from Skills Competition 25
B.4. Institutional Awards 60
B.5. Accreditation Awards 40
B.6. Partnerships forged 30
B.7. Best Practices and Innovations 30
B.8. Compliance to the Directives of the Secretary 65
C. Administrative and Support Services 125
C.1. Budget Utilization Rate (BUR) 25
C.2. Implementation of Agency Action Plan and Status of 25
Implementation (AAPSI) on the Prior Years Audit Recommendation
C.3. Green Practices 15
TESDA CIRCULAR
Organizational Awards Number 121 , series of 2020
Date Issued:
27 October 2020
C.4. Staff Development Program 35
C.S. Model Employee Awards 25
D. Reporting Efficiency 50
D.1. Timeliness, Consistency and Accuracy
E. Social Marketing and Advocacy 40
E.1. Communication Program
GRAND TOTAL 1000
The details of the above-mentioned requirements are in the Scoring Guide attached
herewith as Annex C.
VIII. Schedule of Implementation 2020

Activity Date Person
Responsible
Finalization of the 2020 October 28, 2020 Technical Working
Implementing Guidelines and Group
Criteria for BRO, Galing
Probinsya, and Best Training
Institution Awards
Approval of Secretary/Director November 3, 2020
General
Dissemination of Implementing November 4, 2020 Secretariat
Guidelines to the Regional
Offices
Processing of Regional Office November 4-16, 2020 Secretariat
Performance based on
available/submitted data in 2019
Submission of Provincial Office November 16, 2020 Regional Offices
and TTI nominees to the
Technical Working Group
Review and deliberation of November 17 — Technical Working
regional performance December 14, 2020 Group
Deliberation/Conferment December 15-18, Technical Working

2020 Group for
approval of
Executive
Committee
TESDA CIRCULAR
Organizational Awards Number In , series of 2020
Date Issued:
27 October 2020
Awarding of Best Regional Agency's Year End Secretary/Director
Office, Galing Probinsya, and Recognition General
Best Training Institution
Expenses for implementation of this Program shall be charged against the Institutional
Event Funds.
Wide dissemination of this Circular to all concerned is hereby enjoined.
SEC. ISIRCWAPENA, PhD., CSEE/1?)

Director General
Annex A. Best BRO Award
Requirement OPR/basis Weighted Score Point Value

.Governance Mie --—-—--
A.1. Compliance to Zero Corruption Policy AS/Legal weighted score 40
The Region has no personnel with administrative case filed with TESDA Administrative and Complaints Committee (ACC) 40
The Region has at least one administrative case filed with TESDA Administrative and Complaints Committee (ACC) 0
A.2. Compliance to the TESDA Code of Conduct and Ethical Standards
Valid Complaints against any Official or Employee on the following specific rules of conduct:
• Fidelity to Duty
• Conflict of Interest
• Solicitation and Acceptance of Gifts
• Outside Employment
• Cronyism
• Confidentiality
• Post-employment
• Procurement of Goods, Consulting Services, and Infrastructure Projects
• Encouraging Reporting of Malpractices, Corruption, and other Protected Disclosures Valid
• Complaints from Presidential Action Center (888) and CSC-Contact Center ng Bayan Adverse National ISP Findings
*Valid complaints are complaints that are officially filed, received, and verified by the Administrative and Complaints Committee (ACC)/
Investigation Committee weighted score 30
There are no valid complaints, findings against any Official and Employee. 30
There are 1-3 complaint/s, findings against any Official and Employee. 20
There are 4-6 complaints, findings against any Official and Employee. 10
There are 10 or more complaints, findings against any Official and Employee. 0
A.3. Customer Satisfaction Results
ROPOTI (feedbacks) weighted score 30
Customer Net Satisfaction Rating with minimum of 95%
Customer Net Satisfaction Rating is at 99% and above 30
Customer Net Satisfaction Rating is at 98% 20
Customer Net Satisfaction Rating is below 95% 0
A.4. Compliance to Commission on Audit Rules and Regulations FMS weighted score 30
There are no suspensions and disallowances 30
There are suspensions and disallowances 0
A.S. Compliance to Ph1IGEPS requirements PSD/AS weighted score 30
100% compliance from Publication to Notice and Award and notice to proceed 30
Non-compliance from Publication to Notice and Award and notice to proceed 0
A.6. Liquidation of Cash Advances (Foreign and Local Travel Expenses) FMS 20
A.6.A. Liquidation of Foreign Travel Expenses weighted score 10
All Foreign Travel Expenses liquidated within 60 days 10
Partial number of Foreign Travel Expenses liquidated beyond 60 days 0
A.6.8. Liquidation of Local Travel Expenses weighted score 10
All Local Travel Expenses liquidated within 30 days 10
Partial number of Local Travel Expenses liquidated beyond 30 days 0
A.7. CompllailliMency Procurement Compliance Performance Indicator (APCPI) PSD/AS weighted score 10
The regional office Is compliant to APCPI 10
The regional office is not compliant to APCPI
B. Implementation of TESDA Programs weighted score 595
BA. Implementation of Priority Programs 45
6.1.A. Global Competitiveness 15
6.1.A.1. Reintegration of OFWs PLO/ROMO weighted score 7
The regional office has at least 3-5 programs conducted 7
The regional office has less than 3-5 programs conducted 0
B.1.A.2. Implementation of recognized Diploma Programs weighted score 8
The regional office has at least 3 programs conducted 8
The regional office has less than 3 programs conducted 0
B.1.B. Social Equity 30
B.1.B.1. Skills Training for Drug Dependents 2019 OPCR weighted score 6
8.1.B.2. Skills Training for Inmates and their Families weighted score 6
B.1.B.3. Special Skills Programs for IPs weighted score 6
B.1.13.4. Expanded Training Program for Women and PWDs weighted score 6
B.1.B.5. Training Programs for Other Specials Clients weighted score 6
B.Z. Accomplishment based on the Government Appropriation Act (GAA) and TESDA OPCR indicators
Including Process Cycle Time, Accomplishment Rates, Compliance Rates IPCR 2019 260
All MFOs (PBB Criteria)
6.2.A. Active TESD Committees weighted score 10
The accomplishment rate based on set target is at 100% and above 10
The accomplishment rate based on set target is below 100% 0
B.2.B. Number of Programs Registered 1AS weighted score 10
B.2.C. Process Cycle Time for CTPR Issuance (7days) IIAS weighted score 15
B.2.D. Number of Programs Audited weighted score 15
B.2.E. 85% compliance of WET Programs to TESDA, Industry, Standards, and requirements weighted score 10
The percentage of compliance to audit breaches is at 1% and below 10
The percentage of compliance to audit breaches is at more than 1% 0
B.2.F. Number of skilled workers assessed for certification weighted score 15
B.2.G. Number of TVET Trainers NTTA weighted score 15
B.2.H. Number of Assessors CO weighted score 15
B.2.I. Number of Assessment Centers CO weighted score 15
8.2.J. 86% of TVET graduates that undergo assessment for certification CO weighted score 15
8.2.K. 90% of skilled workers issued with Certification within 7 days of their application CO weighted score 15
8.2.L. Number of Scholarship Programs enrolled ROMO weighted score 35
8.2.M. Number of Scholarship Programs graduates ROMO weighted score 35
8.2.N. Number of TTIs enrollees PO weighted score 10
B.2.0. Number of TTIs graduates PO weighted score 10
B.Z.P. TVET enrolment and graduates by delivery mode- institution-based PO weighted score 5
B.2.Q. TVET enrolment and graduates by delivery mode- enterprise-based PO weighted score 5
B.2.R. WET enrolment and graduates by delivery mode- community-based PO weighted score 5
8.2.5. Implementation of WCO NITESD weighted score 5
B.3. Participation and Awards from Skills Competition WSC 25
B.3.A. Participation weighted score 5
The Region participated in all competitions (PNSC, ASC, and World Skills Competition) 5
The Region participated in PNSC 3
The Region did not participate in any of the competition 0
8.3.8. Awards received at the national level weighted score 10
The Region received award/recognition at the national level 10
The Region did not receive award/recognition 0
B.3.C. Awards received at the international level weighted score 10
The Region received award/recognition at the international level 10
The Region did not receive award/recognition 0
B.4. Institutional Awards PLO / NITESD 60
B.4.A. TESDA Idol (Wage-employed) 15
8.4.A.1. Participation weighted score 5
The Region participated in TESDA Idol (Wage-employed) 5
The Region did not participate in TESDA Idol (Wage-employed) 0
8.4.A.2. Awards received weighted score 10
The Region did not receive award/recognition at the national level 0
B.4.B. TESDA Idol (Self-employed) 15
B.4.B.1. Participation weighted score 5
The Region participated in TESDA Idol (self-employed) 5
The Region did not participate in TESDA Idol (self-employed) 0

B.4.B.2. Awards received weighted score 10
B.4.C. Tagsanay NITESD 15
B.4.C.1. Participation weighted score 5

The Region participated in Tagsanay Awards 5
The Region did not participate in Tagsanay Awards 0
B.4.C.2. Awards received weighted score 10
8.4.D. Kabalikat Awards PLO 15
B.4.D.1. Participation weighted score 5
The Region participated in Kabalikat Awards 5
The Region did not participate in Kabalikat Awards 0
B.4.0.2. Awards received weighted score 10
B.5. Accreditation Awards (STAR Program, APACC) CO 40
B.5.A. Asia Pacific Accreditation and Certification Commission (APACC) 15
B.5.A.1. Participation weighted score 5
The region nominated TVI/s for APACC accreditation 5
The region did not nominate any TVI/s for APACC accreditation 0
B.5.A.2. Awards received weighted score 10
The nominated TVI/s of the region received APACC accreditation 10
The nominated TVI/s of the region did not receive APACC accreditation 0
8.5.B. System for WET Accreditation and Recognition (STAR) Program CO 25
B.5.8.1. Participation weighted score 5

The Region participated in STAR Program 5
The Region did not participate in STAR Program 0
The region received at least one THREE STAR Level Award 20
The region received at least one TWO STAR Level Award 10
The region received at least one ONE STAR Level Award 5
The region did not receive a STAR Level Award 0
B.6. Enterprise-based programs implemented
• To be measured in terms of resources and increase in program outputs PLO 15
• Dual Training System (DTS) and Apprenticeship/Learnership Programs
Both Dual Training System (DTS), Apprenticeship programs implemented 15
The Dual Training System (DTS) or Apprenticeship program is implemented 10
The Dual Training System (DTS) and Apprenticeship program are not implemented 0
8.7. Partnerships forged and implemented
• to be measured in terms of resources and increase in program outputs PLO 15
• CSR — partnership with private companies
For Large Regions: Partnerships with three (3) or more industries / private companies and with continuing tie-ups for the last two (2) years with the same industries/companies;
For Medium Regions: Partnerships with two (2) or more industries / private companies and with continuing tie - ups for the last two (2) years with the same industries/companies; 15
For Small Regions: Partnership with more than one (1) industry / private company and with continuing tie-ups for the last two (2) years with the same industry/company
For Large Regions: Partnerships with less than three (3) industries / private companies and with continuing tie-ups for the last two (2) years with the same industries/companies;
For Medium Regions: Partnerships with less than two (2) industries / private companies and with continuing tie - ups for the last two (2) years with the same industries/companies; 10
For Small Regions: Partnership with one (1) industry / private company and with continuing tie-ups for the last two (2) years with the same industry/company;
For Large Regions: Partnerships with less than three (3) industries / private companies and with continuing tie-ups for less than two (2) years with the same industries/companies;
For Medium Regions: Partnerships with less than two (2) industries / private companies and with continuing tie-ups for less than two (2) years with the same industries/companies; 5
For Small Regions: Partnership with one (1) industry / private company and with continuing tie-ups for less than two (2) years with the same industries/companies;
No partnership forged. 0
8.8. Best Practices and Innovations (engagement of the creation or design of new process or techniques) 30
The region is engaged in the creation or design of new processes or techniques in the services offered and is implemented by the regional office 30
The region is engaged in the creation or design of new processes or techniques in the services offered but is not implemented by the regional office 15
There are no creations or designs of new processes or techniques 0
8.9. Quality Management System Implementation FMS 20
B.9.A. Number of Active IQA Lead Auditor/s weighted score 8
The region has more than more than four (4) active IQA Lead Auditors/Auditors 8
The region has two (2) to four (4) active IQA Lead Auditors/ Auditors 4
The region has less than two (2) active IQA Lead Auditors/ Auditors 0
13.9.8. Timely Submission of Reports/Documents (e.g. IQA reports, Action Catalog, NAP) weighted score 6
The region submitted report/doc ahead of deadline 6
The region submitted report/docs on set deadline 3
The region submitted report/doc after set deadline 0
B.9.C. Percentage of Personnel Attendance to Central Office initiated QMS-related training programs weighted score 6
>80% of regional personnel attended QMS related training programs 6
40% to 80% of regional personnel attended QMS related training programs 3
<40% of regional personnel attended QMS related training programs 0
*Plus (1) Point for ROPO initiated QMS related training programs of personnel 1
B.10. Compliance to Secretary's Directives ROMO 85
B.10.A. Program Registration 45
B.10.A.1. Agri-Related Courses weighted score 15
100% of TTIs have registered at least 1 agri/agri-related course 15
75% to 99% of TTIs have registered at least 1 agri/agri-related course 10
<75% of TTIs have registered at least 1 agri/agri-related course 0
B.10.A.2. Construction Related Courses weighted score 15
100% of TTIs have registered at least 1 construction/construction-related course 15
75% to 99% of TTIs have registered at least 1 construction/construction-related course 10
<75% of TTIs have registered at least 1 construction/construction-related course 0
8.10.A.3. Driving NC II weighted score 15
100% of TTIs have registered at least 1 Driving NC II 15
75% to 99% of TTIs have registered at least 1 Driving NC II 10
<75% of -Ms have registered at least 1 Driving NC II 0
8.10.8. Establishment of PTCs for those provinces without PTC weighted score 15
All provinces have established PTC 15
75% to 99% of provinces have established a PTC 8
<75% have no established PTC 0
B.10.C. Creation of Provisional Training Teams for those provinces without PTC yet weighted score 10
All provinces, without PTC yet, have created a PPTT 10
75% to 99% of provinces, without PTC yet, have created a PPTT 5
<75% of provinces, without PTC yet, have no created PPTT 0
8.10.0. Establishment of Mini-organic Farms by TTIs weighted score 15
100% of TTIs have established mini-organic farms 15
75% to 99% of TTIs have established mini-organic farms 8
<75% of TTIs have established mini-organic farms 0
C. Administrative and Support Se
'Il R) FMS 25
100% of budget utilized 25
79% and below of budget utilized 0
C.2. Implementation of Agency Action Plan and Status of Implementation (AAPSI) on the Prior Years Audit Recommendation
25
80% acted upon (either partially or fully implemented)
100% acted upon (either partially or fully implemented) 25
79% and below acted upon (either partially or fully implemented) 0
C.3. Green Practices
GreenTech/NITE5D 15
100% implementation of plans and projects related to Green Practices
100% implementation of plans and projects related to Green Practices 15 15
51-99% implementation of plans and projects related to Green Practices 8
50% and below implementation of plans and projects related to Green Practices 0
C.4. Staff Development Program HR/AS 35
C.4.A. Employees who have attended SDP have implemented their RE-Entry Plans as scheduled weighted score 20
100% of Employees who attended SDP have implemented their Re-Entry Plans as scheduled 20
75%- 99% of Employees who attended SDP have implemented their Re-Entry Plans as scheduled 10
51- 74% of Employees who attended SDP have implemented their Re-Entry Plans as scheduled 5
50% and below of Employees who attended SDP have implemented their Re-Entry Plans as scheduled 0
C.4.B. Training Opportunities to staff provided for CY 2019 weighted score 15
100% of Employees were provided with training opportunities 15
75%-99% of Employees were provided with training opportunities 8
74% and below of Employees were provided with training opportunities 0
C.S. Model Employee Awards HR/AS 25
C.S.A. Model Employee for Category I Position 8
C.5.A.1. Participation weighted score 4
The Region submitted nominees for Category I 4
The Region did not submit nominees for Category I 0
C.5.A.2. Awards received weighted score 4
The Region has received recognition/award at national level 4
The Region did not receive award/recognition at national level 0
C.S.B. Model Employee for Category II Position 8
C.5.8.1. Participation weighted score 4
The Region submitted nominees for Category II 4
The Region did not submit nominees for Category II 0
0.5.8.2. Awards received weighted score 4
C.S.C. Model Employee for Category III Position 9
C.5.C.1. Participation weighted score 4
The Region submitted nominees for Category III 4
The Region did not submit nominees for Category III 0
C.5.C.2. Awards received weighted score 5
The Region did not receive award/reco: nition at national level 0
EOs 50
D.1. Timeliness, Consistency and Accuracy SO
Reports are accurate and submitted consistently and on time 50
Reports are accurate and submitted consistently but not on time 25
Reports are not accurate and are not submitted on time 0
E. Social Marketin and Ade ISSIOIISO,M,911SOOPOr 1O11111.111 111
A Communication Plan is prepared and fully implemented
• Regional Director acting as spokesperson 40
• Promotion and advocacy activities
A Communication Plan is prepared but is not fully implemented (number of promotion and advocacy activities) 25
There is no communication plan prepared but there are promotion and advocacy activities (i.e. TV appearances, radio guesting, etc.) 10
There is no Communication Plan prepared and implemented 0
GRAND TOTAL 1000
Annex B. Galing Probinsya Award
Requirement OPR/basis Weighted Score Point Value

. . ._
'i ernance Measures Allililiiiililialbillailililik 190
The Province has no personnel with administrative case filed with TESDA Administrative and Complaints Committee (ACC) 40
The Province has at least one administrative case filed with TESDA Administrative and Complaints Committee (ACC) 0
• Cronyism
• Confidentiality
• Post-employment
A.S. Compliance to PhiIGEPS requirements PSD/AS weighted score 30
A.6.8. Liquidation of Local Travel Expenses weighted score 10
A.7. Compliance to Agency Procurement Compliance Performance Indicator (APCPI) PSD/AS weighted score 10
The provincial office is compliant to APCPI 10
The provincial office is not compliant to APCPI 0
6.1.A. Global Competitiveness 15
B.1.A.1. Reintegration of OFWs PLO/ROMO weighted score 7
The provincial office has at least 3-5 programs conducted 7
The provincial office has less than 3-5 programs conducted 0
The provincial office has at least 3 programs conducted 8
The provincial office has less than 3 programs conducted 0
8.1.8. Social Equity 30
B.1.13.2. Skills Training for Inmates and their Families weighted score 6
8.1.8.3. Special Skills Programs for IPs weighted score 6
B.1.6.4. Expanded Training Program for Women and PWDs weighted score 6
B.1.B.5. Training Programs for Other Specials Clients weighted score 6
B.2. Accomplishment based on the Government Appropriation Act (GAA) and TESDA OPCR indicators
Including Process Cycle Time, Accomplishment Rates, Compliance Rates IPCR 2019 260
B.2.A. Active TESD Committees weighted score 10
13.2.8. Number of Programs Registered IAS weighted score 10
B.2.C. Process Cycle Time for CTPR Issuance (7days) 11A5 weighted score 15
13.2.D. Number of Programs Audited weighted score 15
B.2.E. 85% compliance of WET Programs to TESDA, Industry, Standards, and requirements weighted score 10
The percentage of compliance to audit breaches is at 1% and below 10
The percentage of compliance to audit breaches is at more than 1% 0
B.2.F. Number of skilled workers assessed for certification weighted score 15
13.2.G. Number of TVET Trainers NTTA weighted score 15
B.2.H. Number of Assessors CO weighted score 15
B.2.I. Number of Assessment Centers CO weighted score 15
B.2.1. 86% of TVET graduates that undergo assessment for certification CO weighted score 15
B.2.K. 90% of skilled workers issued with Certification within 7 days of their application CO weighted score 15
8.2.L. Number of Scholarship Programs enrolled ROMO weighted score 35
B.2.M. Number of Scholarship Programs graduates ROMO weighted score 35
8.2.N. Number of TTIs enrollees PO weighted score 10
8.2.0. Number of TTIs graduates PO weighted score 10
8.2.P. TVET enrolment and graduates by delivery mode- institution-based PD weighted score 5
B.2.Q. TVET enrolment and graduates by delivery mode- enterprise-based RC) weighted score 5
B.2.R. WET enrolment and graduates by delivery mode- community-based PO weighted score 5
8.2.5. Implementation of WCO NITESD weighted score 5
8.3. Participation and Awards from Skills Competition WSC 25
The Province participated in all competitions (PNSC, ASC, and World Skills Competition) 5
The Province participated in PNSC 3
The Province did not participate in any of the competition 0
B.3.B. Awards received at the national level weighted score 10
The Province received award/recognition at the national level 10
The Province did not receive award/recognition 0
The Province received award/recognition at the international level 10
The Province did not receive award/recognition 0
8.4. Institutional Awards PLO / NITESD 60
B.4.A. TESDA Idol (Wage-employed) 15
8.4.A.1. Participation weighted score 5
The Province participated in TESDA Idol (Wage-employed) 5
The Province did not participate in TESDA Idol (Wage-employed) 0
The Province did not receive award/recognition at the national level 0
8.4.8. TESDA Idol (Self-employed) 15
8.4.8.1. Participation weighted score 5
The Province participated in TESDA Idol (self-employed) 5
The Province did not participate in TESDA Idol (self-employed) 0
B.4.C. Tagsa nay NITESD 15
B.4.C.1. Participation weighted score 5
The Province participated in Tagsanay Awards 5
The Province did not participate in Tagsanay Awards 0
B.4.C.2. Awards received weighted score 10
8.4.0. Kabalikat Awards PLO 15
8.4.D.1. Participation weighted score 5
The Province participated in Kabalikat Awards 5
The Province did not participate in Kabalikat Awards 0
B.S. Accreditation Awards (STAR Program, APACC) CO 40
B.S.A. Asia Pacific Accreditation and Certification Commission (APACC) 15
B.S.A.1. Participation weighted score 5
The province nominated TVI/s for APACC accreditation 5
The province did not nominate any TVI/s for APACC accreditation 0
The nominated TVI/s of the province received APACC accreditation 10
The nominated TVI/s of the province did not receive APACC accreditation 0
B.S.B. System for TVET Accreditation and Recognition (STAR) Program CO 25
B.5.8.1. Participation weighted score 5
The Province participated in STAR Program 5
The Province did not participate in STAR Program 0
B.5.8.2. Awards received weighted score 20
The province received at least one THREE STAR Level Award 20
The province received at least one TWO STAR Level Award 10
The province received at least one ONE STAR Level Award 5
The province did not receive a STAR Level Award 0
8.6. Enterprise-based programs implemented
• To be measured in terms of resources and increase in program outputs PIO 15
• Dual Training System (DTS) and Apprenticeship/Learnership Programs
Both Dual Training System (DTS), Apprenticeship programs implemented 15
The Dual Training System (DTS) or Apprenticeship program is implemented 10
The Dual Training System (DTS) and Apprenticeship program are not implemented 0
B.7. Partnerships forged and implemented
• to be measured in terms of resources and increase in program outputs PLO 15
• CSR — partnership with private companies
For Large Provinces: Partnerships with three (3) or more industries / private companies and with continuing tie-ups for the last two (2) years with the same industries/companies;
For Medium Provinces: Partnerships with two (2) or more industries / private companies and with continuing tie - ups for the last two (2) years with the same industries/companies; 15
For Small Provinces: Partnership with more than one (1) industry / private company and with continuing tie-ups for the last two (2) years with the same industry/company
For Large Provinces: Partnerships with less than three (3) industries / private companies and with continuing tie-ups for the last two (2) years with the same industries/companies;
For Medium Provinces: Partnerships with less than two (2) industries / private companies and with continuing tie - ups for the last two (2) years with the same industries/companies; 10
For Small Provinces: Partnership with one (1) industry / private company and with continuing tie-ups for the last two (2) years with the same industry/company;
For Large Provinces: Partnerships with less than three (3) industries / private companies and with continuing tie-ups for less than two (2) years with the same industries/companies;
For Medium Provinces: Partnerships with less than two (2) industries / private companies and with continuing tie-ups for less than two (2) years with the same industries/companies; 5
For Small Provinces: Partnership with one (1) industry / private company and with continuing tie-ups for less than two (2) years with the same industries/companies;
No partnership forged. 0
8.8. Best Practices and Innovations (engagement of the creation or design of new process or techniques) 30
The province is engaged in the creation or design of new processes or techniques in the services offered and is implemented by the provincial office 30
The province is engaged in the creation or design of new processes or techniques in the services offered but is not implemented by the provincial office 15
B.9. Quality Management System Implementation FMS 20
B.9.A. Number of Active IQA Lead Auditor/s weighted score 8
The province has more than more than one (1) active IQA Lead Auditors/Auditors 8
The province has one (1) active IQA Lead Auditors/ Auditors 4
The province has no active IQA Lead Auditors/ Auditors 0
8.9.8. Timely Submission of Reports/Documents (e.g. IQA reports, Action Catalog, NAP) weighted score 6
The province submitted report/doc ahead of deadline 6
The province submitted report/docs on set deadline 3
The province submitted report/doc after set deadline 0
B.9.C. Percentage of Personnel Attendance to Central Office initiated QMS-related training programs weighted score 6
>80% of provincial personnel attended QMS related training programs 6
40% to 80% of provincial personnel attended QMS related training programs 3
<40% of provincial personnel attended QMS related training programs 0
*Plus (1) Point for ROPO initiated QMS related training programs of personnel 1
8.10. Compliance to Secretary's Directives ROMO 85
8.10.A. Program Registration 45
8.10.A.1. Agri-Related Courses weighted score 15
100% of TTIs have registered at least 1 agri/agri-related course 15
75% to 99% of TTIs have registered at least 1 agri/agri-related course 10
<75% of Ills have registered at least 1 agri/agri-related course 0
B.10.A.2. Construction Related Courses weighted score 15
100% of TTIs have registered at least 1 construction/construction-related course 15
75% to 99% of TTIs have registered at least 1 construction/construction-related course 10
<75% of Ills have registered at least 1 construction/construction-related course 0
B.10.A.3. Driving NC II weighted score 15
100% of TTIs have registered at least 1 Driving NC II 15
75% to 99% of Ills have registered at least 1 Driving NC II 10
<75% of TTIs have registered at least 1 Driving NC II 0
6.10.8. Establishment of PTCs for those provinces without PTC weighted score 15
All provinces have established PTC 15
75% to 99% of provinces have established a PTC 8
<75% have no established PTC 0
B.10.C. Creation of Provisional Training Teams for those provinces without PTC yet weighted score 10
All provinces, without PTC yet, have created a PPTT 10
75% to 99% of provinces, without PTC yet, have created a PPTT 5
<75% of provinces, without PTC yet, have no created PPTT 0
B.10.D. Establishment of Mini-organic Farms by TTIs weighted score 15
100% of TTIs have established mini-organic farms 15
75% to 99% of TTIs have established mini-organic farms 8
<75% of TTIshave established miiii=f2Iicfarrris 0
.,., -.
C.1. Budget Utilization Rate (BUR) FMS 25
79% and below of budget utilized 0
25
79% and below acted upon (either partially or fully implemented) 0
GreenTech/NITESD 15
51-99% implementation of plans and projects related to Green Practices 8
50% and below implementation of plans and projects related to Green Practices 0
C.4. Staff Development Program HR/AS 35
100% of Employees who attended SDP have implemented their Re-Entry Plans as scheduled 20
75%- 99% of Employees who attended SDP have implemented their Re-Entry Plans as scheduled 10
51- 74% of Employees who attended SDP have implemented their Re-Entry Plans as scheduled 5
50% and below of Employees who attended SDP have implemented their Re-Entry Plans as scheduled 0
C.4.B. Training Opportunities to staff provided for CY 2019 weighted score 15
100% of Employees were provided with training opportunities 15
75%-99% of Employees were provided with training opportunities 8
74% and below of Employees were provided with training opportunities 0
The Province submitted nominees for Category I 4
The Province did not submit nominees for Category I 0
C.S.A.2. Awards received weighted score 4
The Province has received recognition/award at national level 4
The Province did not receive award/recognition at national level 0
C.S.B. Model Employee for Category II Position 8
C.5.6.1. Participation weighted score 4
The Province submitted nominees for Category II 4
The Province did not submit nominees for Category II 0
C.5.B.2. Awards received weighted score 4
C.S.C. Model Employee for Category III Position 9
C.5.C.1. Participation weighted score
The Province submitted nominees for Category III 4
The Province did not submit nominees for Category III 0
C.5.0 2. Awards received weighted score
D.1. Timeliness, Consistency and Accuracy 50

Reports are accurate and submitted consistently and on time 50
Reports are accurate and submitted consistently but not on time 25
Reports are not accurate and are not submitted on time 0

• Provincial Director acting as spokesperson 40
A Communication Plan is prepared but is not fully implemented (number of promotion and advocacy activities) 25
There is no communication plan prepared but there are promotion and advocacy activities (i.e.TV appearances, radio guesting, etc.) 10
There is no Communication Plan prepared and implemented 0
GRAND TOTAL 1000
Annex C. Best Training Institution Award
Requirement OPR/basis Weighted score Point Value

A. Good Governance Measures .190
The TTI has no personnel with administrative case filed with TESDA Administrative and Complaints Committee (ACC) 40
The TTI has at least one administrative case filed with TESDA Administrative and Complaints Committee (ACC) 0
• Cronyism
• Confidentiality
• Post-employment
A.S. Compliance to PhilGEPS requirements PSD/AS weighted score 30
A.6.B. Liquidation of Local Travel Expenses weighted score 10
A.7. Compliance to Agency Procurement Compliance Performance Indicator (APCPI) PSD/AS weighted score 10
The TTI is compliant to APCPI 10
The TTI is not compliant to APCPI 0
B.1.A. Global Competitiveness 26
B.1.A.1. Reintegration of OFWs PLO/ROMO weighted score 8
The TTI has at least two (2) programs conducted 8
The TTI has less than two (2) programs conducted 0
The TTI has at least 2 programs implemented 18
The TTI has less than 2 programs implemented 0
B.1.B. Social Equity 34
B.1.B.1. UAQTEA Scholarship Program weighted score 10
TTI FULLY implemented UAQTEA 2018 Program (Qualification Maps) 10
TTI PARTIALLY implemented UAQTEA 2018 Program (Qualification Maps) 5
TTI not implemented UAQTEA 2018 Program (Qualification Maps) 0
B.1.B.3. Skills Training for Inmates and their Families weighted score 6
The TTI has at least 2 programs conducted 6
The TTI has less than 2 programs conducted 0
B.1.B.4. Special Skills Programs for IPs weighted score 6
B.1.B.5. Expanded Training Program for Women and PWDs weighted score 6
B.1.C. Career Guidance Program 30
B.1.C.1. Implementation Profiling weighted score 15
100% of TTI enrollees profiled 15
75% - 99.99% of TTI enrollees profiled 10
50% - 74.99% of TTI enrollees profiled 5
49.99% and below of TTI enrollees profiled 0
B.1.C.2. Referred Graduates for Possible Employment weighted score 15
100% of TTI graduates referred 15
75% - 99.99% of TTI graduates referred 10
50% - 74.99% of TTI graduates referred 5
49.99% and below of TTI graduates referred 0
B.2. Accomplishment based on the Government Appropriation Act (GAA) and TESDA OPCR indicators
Including Process Cycle Time, Accomplishment Rates, Compliance Rates 255
B.2.A. WET Trainers Development Programs - TM Level II weighted score 20
The TTI had at least one (1) certified trainer in TM Level II (any CoCs) 10
The TTI does not have certified Trainer in TM Level II (any CoCs) 0
B.2.B. WET Trainers Development Programs - Industry Immersion IAS weighted score 20
The TTI had send at least 2 trainers for industry immersion 10
The TTI had not send trainers for industry immersion 0
B.2.C. Percentage of TTI Trainers are Accredited National Competency Assessors IIAS weighted score 15
70% of the TTI trainers are accredited National Competency Assessors 15
50-69.99% of the TTI trainers are accredited National Competency Assessors 10
49.99% and below of the TTI trainers are accredited National Competency Assessors 0
B.2.D. Percentage of TTI registered Programs (WTR) are Accredited Assessment Center weighted score 15
50% of the TTI trainers are accredited National Competency Assessors 15
30-49.99% of the TTI trainers are accredited National Competency Assessors 10
29.99% and below of the TTI trainers are accredited National Competency Assessors 0
B.2.E. Percentage of TTI Graduates in WTR Programs assessed weighted score 25
100% of the TTI graduates assessed 25
75% - 99.99% of the TTI graduates assessed 15
24.99% and below of the TTI graduates assessed 0
B.2.F. Percentage of graduates in programs with training regulations assessed, certified weighted score 15
85% and above of the TTI graduates assessed, certified 15
75% - 84.99% of the TTI graduates assessed, certified 10
50% - 74.99% of the TTI graduates assessed, certified 0
B.2.G. Graduates of TTI - Institution-based NTTA weighted score 35
The accomplishment rate based on set target is 75% - 99.99% 20
B.2.H. Graduates of TTI - Enterprise-based CO weighted score 35
B.2.I. Graduates of TTI - Community-based CO weighted score 30
B.2.1. Number of Mobile Training Programs Implemented CO weighted score 15
The TTI implemented at least 10 Mobile Training Programs 15
The TTI implemented 5-9 Mobile Training Programs 0
The TTI implemented 1-4 Mobile Training Programs CO 15
The TTI did not implement Mobile Training Program 15
B.2.K. Percentage of TTI graduates trained in Entrepreneurship Training Program CO weighted score 15
80% and up of the TTI graduates trained on entrepreneurship training program 15
50% - 79.99% of the TTI graduates trained on entrepreneurship training program 10
25% - 49.99% of the TTI graduates trained on entrepreneurship training program 5
24.99% and below of the TTI graduates trained on entrepreneurship training program 0
B.2.L. Preparation of Institutional Development Plan (IDP) 15 15
The TTI prepared and submitted its IDP to the Regional Office 15
The TTI did not prepare its IDP 0
8.3. Participation and Awards from Skills Competition WSC 25
The TTI participated in all competitions (ASC and World Skills Competition) 5
The TTI participated in PNSC 3
The TTI did not participate in any of the competition 0
B.3.B. Awards received at the national level weighted score 10
The TTI received award/recognition at the national level 10
The TTI did not receive award/recognition 0
The TTI received award/recognition at the international level 10
The TTI did not receive award/recognition 0
B.4. Institutional Awards - Tagsanay Awards PLO / NITESD 60
8.4.A. Participation weighted score 20
The TTI participated in Tagsanay Awards 5
The TTI did not participate in Tagsanay Awards 0
B.4.B. Awards received weighted score 40
The Region received major award/recognition at the national level 40
The Region received minor/special award/recognition at the national level 20
B.S. Accreditation Awards (STAR Program, APACC) CO 40
8.5.A. Asia Pacific Accreditation and Certification Commission (APACC) 15
B.S.A.1. Participation weighted score 5
The TTI applied for APACC accreditation 5
The TTI did not apply for APACC accreditation 0
B.5.A.2. Awards received weighted score 10
The TTI received APACC-Gold accreditation 20
The TTI received APACC-Silver accreditation 10
The TTI received APACC-Bronze accreditation 5
The nominated TVI/s of the region did not receive APACC accreditation 0
B.5.B. System for WET Accreditation and Recognition (STAR) Program CO weighted score 25
B.5.B.1. Participation 5 5
The TTI participated in STAR Program 5
The TTI did not participate in STAR Program 0
The region received at least one THREE STAR Level Award 20
The region received at least one TWO STAR Level Award 10
The region received at least one ONE STAR Level Award 5
The region did not receive a STAR Level Award 0
B.6. Partnerships forged and implemented (The max. score conferred to the applicant must not exceed 30 points) PLO 30
The Dual Training System (DTS) or Dual Training Program (DTP) is implemented 30
Curriculum of TTI program offering reviewed and updated to current technology and industry practices standards 20
TTI trainers undergone industry immersion with partner companies/enterprises 15
The Dual Training System (DTS) or Dual Training Program (DTP) is not implemented 0
8.7. Best Practices and Innovations (engagement of the creation or design of new process or techniques) PLO 30
The TTI is engaged in the creation or design of new processes or techniques in the services offered and is implemented by the regional office 30
The TTI is engaged in the creation or design of new processes or techniques in the services offered but is not implemented by the regional office 15
B.8. Compliance to Secretary's Directives ROMO 65
B.8.A. Program Registration 0 45
B.8.A.1. Agri-Related Courses weighted score 15
The TTI has registered at least 1 agri/agri-related qualification 15
The TTI has no registered agri/agri-related course 0
B.8.A.2. Construction Related Courses weighted score .15
The TTI has registered at least 1 construction/construction-related qualification 15
The TTI has no registered construction/construction-related qualification 0
B.8.A.3. Driving NC II weighted score 15
The TTI have registered Driving NC II 15
The TTI has no registered Driving NC II 0
B.8.B. Establishment of Mini-organic Farms by TTIs weighted score 20
The TTI has established a mini-organic farm 20
The TTI has not established a mini-organic farm 0
C. Administrative and Support Services 111 illk 125
C.1. Budget Utilization Rate (BUR) FMS 25
100% of budget utilized 25 25
79% and below of budget utilized 0 0
25
100% acted upon (either partially or fully implemented) 25 25
79% and below acted upon (either partially or fully implemented) 0 0
GreenTech/NITESD 15
51-99% implementation of plans and projects related to Green Practices 8 8
50.99% and below implementation of plans and projects related to Green Practices 0 0
CA. Staff Development Program HR/AS 35
100% of Employees who attended SDP have implemented their Re-Entry Plans as scheduled 20 20
75%- 99% of Employees who attended SDP have implemented their Re-Entry Plans as scheduled 10 10
51- 74% of Employees who attended SDP have implemented their Re-Entry Plans as scheduled 5 5
50% and below of Employees who attended SDP have implemented their Re-Entry Plans as scheduled 0 0
C.4.8. Training Opportunities to staff provided for CY 2019 weighted score 15
100% of Employees were provided with training opportunities 15 15
75%-99% of Employees were provided with training opportunities 8 8
74.99% and below of Employees were provided with training opportunities 0 0
The TTI submitted nominees for Category I 5
The TTI did not submit nominees for Category I 0
C.S.A.2. Awards received weighted score 7
C.5.8. Model Employee for Category II Position weighted score 13
C.5.8.1. Participation 5 5
The TTI submitted nominees for Category II 5
The TTI did not submit nominees for Category II 0
C.5.8.2. Awards received weighted score 8
The Re:ion did not receive award/reco:nition at national level 0
D. Repprting Efficiency EOs 50
D.1. Timeliness, Consistency and Accuracy 50
Reports are accurate and submitted consistently and on time 50 50
Reports are accurate and submitted consistently but not on time 25 25
Reports are not accurate and are not submitted on time 0 0
E.Social Marketing and ArItiacy —iillilibiliiiiir
— , PID 40
E.1. Communication Program (OPCR) 40
• TTI Administrator acting as spokesperson 40 40
A Communication Plan is prepared but is not fully implemented (number of promotion and advocacy activities) 25 25
There is no communication plan prepared but there are promotion and advocacy activities (i.e. TV appearances, radio guesting, etc.) 10 10
There is no Communication Plan prepared and implemented 0 0
GRAND TOTAL 1000

TESDA Circular No. 127-2020

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

TESDA Circular No. 127-2020

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

TESDA CIRCULAR

Subject: Implementing Guidelines for the 2019 TESDA Page 1 of 10 page/s

The TESDA-PRAISE aims to encourage, recognize, and reward accomplishments and

II. Program Description

The TESDA Organizational Awards is a component of TESDA-PRAISE which

The Organizational Awards include the following:

• Best Regional Office (BRO) Award

• Best Training Institution Award

The TESDA organizational Awards shall seek to:

IV. Scope and Coverage

SMALL MEDIUM LARGE

SMALL MEDIUM LARGE

Camarines Norte Albay

Agusan del Norte Surigao del Sur

Basilan Lanao del Sur

5. The TTIs shall be grouped as follows:

V Eligibility for Organizational Awards

Good Governance Indicators such as:

VI. Mechanics of Implementation

A. BRO and Galing Probinsya Award

A. Best Regional Office (BRO) and Galing Probinsya Award

The details of the above-mentioned requirements are in the Scoring Guides

B. Best Training Institution Award

VIII. Schedule of Implementation 2020

Deliberation/Conferment December 15-18, Technical Working

Wide dissemination of this Circular to all concerned is hereby enjoined.

SEC. ISIRCWAPENA, PhD., CSEE/1?)

Requirement OPR/basis Weighted Score Point Value

The Region did not participate in TESDA Idol (self-employed) 0

B.4.C.1. Participation weighted score 5

B.5.8.1. Participation weighted score 5

Requirement OPR/basis Weighted Score Point Value

D.1. Timeliness, Consistency and Accuracy 50

E.1. Communication Program (OPCR)

Requirement OPR/basis Weighted score Point Value

You might also like