You are on page 1of 51

Feedback of The CT QC

Name: BAUNIA ABDUL JALIL HIGH SCHOOL ID: 4677271139-sub Date: 2021 - 8 - 8

1-Feedback for the Str Drawing


Sub-C
NO Subject JV QC Comment Remark
Desk
1 Is Project Name & ID correctly provided in the Drawings? 1
2 Is ID presented in all pages and if it is correct? 1
3 Is North direction presented and is corect? 1
4 Are at least two levels of dimension lines provided for plan? 1
5 Check the column orientation and if have brick column, mark it with its identification like BC1, BC2 1
6 Column types should be according to rebar number not just dimention. 0
7 Is separation joint identified in plan and compatible with its picture.
8 Is scales correctly provided for all drawings? 1
9 Are lintel rebar arrangements provided? 0
10 Are all columns and beams named in layout plan? 1
11 Check Grid distance and compare with Arch Plan grid 1

12 Are gridlines and column orientation compatible in all Str plans ad also are they compatible with Arch plan? 1

13 Stair section with details with detailing of landing beam.


14 Are all column, beam and slab details are based on Ferro results 0
15 over all compatibility with Arch Plan 1
Section of Columns
16 Are all columns long sections and cross sections given in column schedule? 1
17 Are longitudinal rebars (size, number, and spacing) matches with Ferro Scan and exposure Results 1
18 Ties (size, number and spacing) with reference to Ferro in middle portion 0
19 Ties (size, number and spacing) with reference to Ferro in Bottom portion and exposure results 0
20 Is concrete cover matches with ferro and exposure?
Is long section of column consistent with each column section and footing. (dimension and longitudinal rebar
21 1
and ties)?
22 Are orientation of columns OK? (according o field sketches) 1
23 Is there any soil investigation report ? 0
24 Are dimensions of all columns given in column schedule properly ? 1
Section of footing
25 Dimension of footing present on drawing (level, grade beam, thickness, depth, etc.) 1
26 Check footing measurement with checklist 0
27 Are the dimensions of the footing same in all drawings (plan, elevation, section) 1
Section of slab
28 Are stair slab details provided and match with Ferro? 1
29 Is long section of slab presenting rebar in both direction? 1
30 Is long section of slab matches with Ferro and exposure? 1
31 Is section of slab and stair slab presented in all sections and compatible with their own section? 1
32 Is the beam section correctly presented in the Slab section? 1
Section of Beams
33 Are the grade Beam details presented? 1
34 Are all beams long sections and cross sections given in beam schedule and compatible with layout? 1
35 Is beam naming and dimensions in all drawings match? 1
36 Are beam rebar details match the ferro scan result and exposure? 0
37 Is long section of beam consistent with each beam section (dimension and rebar long and stirrups) 1
2.Feed Back in Site Plan
38 Is Site Plan matches with google earth photo? 0
39 Six photos (included two insides, two out sides , front side,and google earth) are provided? 0
40 Is the shape of building in site plan and Arch drawing matches? 0
41 Is distance between all buildings are presented in site plan? 0
42 Is tin shed shown in roof top layout plan? (if exist) N/A
43 Is the boundary wall include in site plan with height, length and materials section? 0
44 Is project details information tabel provided in site plan? and if it is correct? 1
45 Are Sewarage system located in site plan with proper direction? 0
46 Are two section for each building included with site plan marking with section cut lines? 0
47 Is the north direction presented in site plan? 0
3-Feedback for the Documentations
48 Are Project Name & ID correct in the report? 1
49 Are ID in all checklists and test results correct? 1
50 Are all columns and beams named in layout plan? 1
51 Is different construction phases mentioned ? 1
52 Are PDF files same as DWG files? 1
53 Are all texts in PDF format legible? 1
54 Are all checklists provided (Str and Arch layout should be signed by supervisrs)? 1
55 Naming should be based on template provided 1
4-Feedback for the Floor Plan
56 Is North direction presented in the plan and all North symbols match together? 0
57 Are all columns and beams named in layout plan? 1
58 Are thickness of all walls presented? 1
59 Are floor finishing details compatible with exposure pictures? 1
60 Are gridlines and column orientation compatible in all Arch plans? 1
Are the level of storied presented in title of plan match with other dimentions? (in elevation, section,
61 1
foundation data, etc)
62 Is separation joint and slab connection presented in the plan with notes? 0
63 Is dimension plans for all floors 1/100 scale presented? 0
64 Is detailed information table provided? (Floor Finishing Schedule table) 0
65 Is Details information about window (with sill height and size) presented for all windows? 1
66 Is details information about door with sill height and size presented? 1
67 Is detailed information about wall, floor and ceiling in each room presented? 1
68 Is the level changes in every floor presented? 1
69 Are the wall sections in plan and section hatched?
5-Feedback for the Section
70 Are the wall sections in section hatched and sections are provided?
71 Are all room number and code and use presented in the sction?
72 Is the number of stairs presented correctly on plan and section? 1
73 Are thickness of Walls match the plan? 1
74 Are landing beam details are presented in stair case? N/A
76 Are the location of cut lines displayed in all plans? 1
Section X-X
77 Is name of section being correct (X-X)? 1
78 Are drop walls correctly presented? 1
79 Is the beam dimension and slab dimensions presented correctly and match with frame layout? 1
80 Is the section containing foundation and grade beam witth details information? 1
81 Is the foundation section and grade beam matched with their section? 0
82 Are parapet dimensions correctly presented? N/A
83 Are window openings in plan and elevation and section match? N/A
84 Are door openings in plan and elevation and section match? 1
85 Are parapet wall and water tank and roof access presented correctly? 1
86 Are elevation levels (height) in section match with plan? 1
87 Roof Details information provided? 0
Section Y-Y
88 Is name of section being correct (Y-Y)? 1
89 Are drop walls correctly presented? N/A
90 Is the beam dimension and slab dimensions presented correctly and match with frame layout? 0
91 Is the section containing foundation and grade beam witth details information? 1
92 Is the foundation section and grade beam matched with their section? 0
93 Are parapet dimensions correctly presented? N/A
94 Are window openings in plan and elevation and section match? 0
95 Are door openings in plan and elevation and section match? 0
96 Are parapet wall and water tank and roof access presented correctly? N/A
97 Are elevation levels (height) in section match with plan? 1
98 Roof Details information provided? 1
6-Feedback for the Elevation
99 Is different construction phases presented in plan and elevation?
100 Are at least two levels of dimension lines provided in at least two sides for plan and elevation? 1
101 Are exposed pipes presented in Elevation?
102 Are elevation symbols presented in all plans? 0
103 Are window and door openings in plan and elevation match? 0
104 Are levels (heights) in elevation match with plan? 1
105 Are naming of elevations correct? (North, South…) 0
106 Are parapet wall and water tank and roof access presented correctly? 0
107 Are elevations match with pictures?
108 Are stair slab elevations mentioned correctly in both plan and section? 1
109 Is Ground level Shown in elevation? 1
7-Feedback for the Lintel Section/False Slab/ Counter slab
110 Are Lintel Id Name Lintel Type presented? 0
111 Is the size of sun shade presented? 0
112 Is Sill height of counter slab with thickness 0
113 Is Sill height of false slab with thickness presented? 0
8-Feedback for the NDT and DT Test
114 Are Locations and IDs of NDTs and Destructive tests correct? 1
115 Check
Check the
theimage scan pointpoint
rebar exposure in layout withthree
(at least Image ID. and image scan point and cross check the rebar dia with
points) 1
116 exposer report 1
117 Check the 20% ferro scan point in column, beam in all floors 1
9-Feedback for the MEP
Water Distribution Plan
118 Exposed water piping route, and size shall be shown. 1
119 Material & specification (uPVC,PVC,PPR,CPVC,GI) of piping shall be clarified. 1
120 Inlet (From WASA) of water piping of building shall be identified and clearly depicted in the drawings. 1
121 Exposed pipe route should be shown in elevation.
122 Elevation (heigjht) of piping shall be clarified.
123 Material & specification of all piping shall be clarified.
124 Water piping inlet and outlet of wet are like toilets shall be clearly presented in the drawings with picture 1
125 If mechanical room exists, a plan of the mechanical room shall be provided with pictures. N/A

126 Show the location of reservoir tank (if exists) with picture. Show the inlet point with picture at reservoir tank N/A
(if possible)

127
Show the pump with specifications and pictures. If there is a submersible pump show the location with picture.

128 Show the route of piping to over head tank from reservoir with pictures and elevation. Show the route of piping
in elevation drawing
129 1
Show each
Show the distribution lineat(if
point of inlet wetexposed) to every
areas with heightwet areaspoint,
(basin of each floor (washrooms,
bib-cock, push showerbasins) with
etc) from pictures.
floor level with
130 pictures.
Sewage Plan
Horizontal piping over each bathroom where both sewage line connected
131 A sewage plan shall be provided in autocad format in elevation. (both vertical and horizontal piping) with each other with long trap, bend and TEE then horizontally connected
with vertical line which passes sludge to soil stack.

132 Show the sewage line which enters at septic tank with pictures. 1
133 Show the septic tank location with pictures. 1
134 Show the point of each sewage line and waste water evacuation line with pictures at every washroom.
135 A sewage plan shall be provided in autocad format with pictures.
136 Exposed sewage pipes and size shall be shown with pictures. 1
137 Outlet of sewage of building shall be identified and clearly depicted in the drawings 1
138 Material & specification (size) of all swage pipes shall be clarified
139 Sewage inlet and outlet of wet are like toilets shall be clearly presented in the drawings 1
140 Location of specification of sewage pump shall be shown with picture (if exists) N/A
Down Pipes and rain piping systems (Drainage Plan)
141 Location of all floors drain & rain drain shall be shown with pictures.
142 Location & material and specification of all rain drain piping shall be clarified
Horizontal piping over each bathroom is missing. No detailing of horizontal
143 0
piping.
A complete plan of drainage system at the site for both rain and sewage system shall be provided.
144 Location of clean outs shall be shown with photos 1
Cooling, Heating and Fire Fighting N/A
145 If exists, the plans for cooling and heating systems shall be provided including HVAC
146 Location of indoor and outdoor AC units, condensers, splits etc… shall be shown (if exist)
147 Location and size of all ceiling fans shall be clarified
148 Exhaust system of toilets shall be clarified
149 Location & size of fire box shall be shown in each floor
EL Drawings
150 Cable routes (In exposed condition) shall be demonstrated in the autocad drawings with pictures.
151 Technical specifications of cables such as the size and watt shall be presented (Cable Picture)
Outlet and inlet of SDB not given. Not even in legend table. No
152 Outlet and inlet of cables of building and MDB SDB shall be presented in the drawings with pictures 0
technical specification given for SDB.
153 Outlet and inlet of cables of wet area like toilet shall be presented in the drawings with cable size
154 Socket outlet plan shall be presented in the drawings with pictures. 0 No socket outlet plan given in drawing.
155 If any more hazerd materials exist mention with picture & location. N/A
156 Fire detection/alarm plan shall be presented through autocad drawings. (if exist) N/A
SDB numbering not done and need specific identification of picture
157 0
All the MDB, SDB picture mention in drawing by locating in layout. of each SDB. Mentioned MDB size in legend not exists.
158 Have sound system and CC camera with picture & location. N/A
159 All electro-mechanical equipments have to show with picture in details
10-Feedback for the NSE
160 NSEs should be provided in excel format and number of the items should be presented 1
161 Compatibility between the Number of the NSEs and the photos 1
162 All the photos should be stored in floor-wise aproach 1
photos should be taken at the locations of anchorage if the elements are not anchored, photos of the gap
163 1
between nonstructural element and the wall/floor should be taken
164 NSE Checklist have to fill up with proper guidline 0
The number of items of each NSE component found in each story should be noted down in the checklist under
165 1
the columns of 1st Floor, 2nd Floor, 3rd Floor and so on.
The dimensions of each component should be measured and incorporated in the checklist in the appropriate
166 box. For example, length,width and height of a table, bench could be measured for dimensions 0

167 The weight of each item should be estimated based on visual observation. 1
Height of the NSEs should be measured either from the ceiling or from the floor and incorporated into the
168 1
checklist in appropriate box.
11-Feedback for the Photos
169 Photograph taken from each side of the structure 1
170 Photograph taken from foundation with measurement 1
171 Photograph taken from All test with grid number and separation joint (if any) with measurement 1
172 Photos of Damaged members and other critical places of the structure 0
Photograph taken from NSEs in each room from six position with mentioning the particular room number in
173 0
each floor
12-Feedback for the FERRO-SCAN
174 For column give all doc : like all scan image, picture of data takeing, gride no in a separet folder 0
175 For beam give all doc : like all scan image, picture of data, gride no in a separet folder 0
176 For slab give all doc : like all scan image, picture of data, gride no in a separet folder 0
177 In structural drawing marks scaning position and give note 20% or type base 1
178 Ferro scan checklist is signed by JV and PIU 1
13-Feedback for the REABER EXPOSE
179 Scan Image data of Rebar exposure position , checklist and picture in a folder. 0
180 All picture must be clear for measurment observation. 1
181 Incorporate the exposure area in structure drawing 1
14-Feedback for the Foundation
182 All picture of foundation must be clear with measurment in a folder 1
183 If excavation is not possible than attach the existing drawing in a folder and give note in footing drawing
184 Check checklist information with section of footing 0
Explanation of QC

Name: BAUNIA ABDUL JALIL HIGH SCHOOL ID: 4677271139-sub


Date: 2

1-Feedback for the ARCH. Drawing


status
NO Subject (Red: Not Location
OK)
3

1 Is Site Plan matches with google earth photo? 0

Six photos (included two insides, two out sides , front side,and google
2 0
earth) are provided?
3 Is the shape of building in site plan and Arch drawing matches? 0

4 Is distance between all buildings are presented in site plan? 0

Is the boundary wall include in site plan with height, length and materials
5
section? 0

6 Are Sewarage system located in site plan with proper direction? 0 LOOK 3/4
Are two section for each building included with site plan marking with
7
section cut lines? 0

8 Is the north direction presented in site plan? 0

LOOK 1/2

Is North direction presented in the plan and all North symbols match
9 0
together?
10 Is separation joint and slab connection presented in the plan with notes? 0

11 Is dimension plans for all floors 1/100 scale presented? 0

12 Is detailed information table provided? (Floor Finishing Schedule table) 0


13 Is the foundation section and grade beam matched with their section? 0

14 Roof Details information provided? 0

Is the beam dimension and slab dimensions presented correctly and match
15
with frame layout? 0
16 Is the foundation section and grade beam matched with their section? 0

17 Are window openings in plan and elevation and section match? 0

18 Are door openings in plan and elevation and section match? 0

19 Are elevation symbols presented in all plans? 0


20 Are window and door openings in plan and elevation match? 0

21 Are naming of elevations correct? (North, South…) 0


22 Are parapet wall and water tank and roof access presented correctly? 0

23 OTHERS-1 0

24 OTHERS-2 0
25 OTHERS-3 0

26 OTHERS-4 0
27 OTHERS-5 0

28 OTHERS-6 0
29 OTHERS-7 0

30 OTHERS-8 0

31 OTHERS-9 0
32 OTHERS-10 0

33 OTHERS-11 0
34 OTHERS-12 0

35 OTHERS-13 0
36 OTHERS-14 0

37 OTHERS-15 0
38 OTHERS-16 0

39 OTHERS-17 0

40 OTHERS-18 0

0
NSE
32 NSE Checklist have to fill up with proper guidline 0

The dimensions of each component should be measured and incorporated


34 in the checklist in the appropriate box. For example, length,width and 0
height of a table, bench could be measured for dimensions

LINTEL
37 Are Lintel Id Name Lintel Type presented? 0

38 Is the size of sun shade presented? 0


39 Is Sill height of counter slab with thickness 0

40 Is Sill height of false slab with thickness presented? 0


Date: 2021-08-08

g
JV Explanation

NOT VISIBLE PHOTOS


SURVEY BUILDING AREA NOT CLEAR.

NEAREST BUILDING DISTANCE NOT CLEAR.

PROVIDE BOUNDARY WALL WITH DETAIL

PROVIDE SEWARAGE SYSTEM CLEARLY


NOT VISIBLE SECTION DRAWINGS

PROVID MAP PHOTO


PROVIDE SEPARATION JOINT DRAWING IN ALL
FLOOR PLANS

PROVIDE DIMENSION PLANS AS LIKE WORKING


DRAWING

FLOOR FINISHING SHEDULETABLE ARE NOT


READEBLE
FPROVIDE GROUND FLOOR SLAB DRAWIG
MATCHED WITH PROVIDED DETAIL SECTION &
THICKNESS

PROVIDE ROOF DETAIL I EACH SECTION

FPROVIDE GROUND FLOOR SLAB DRAWIG


MATCHED WITH PROVIDED DETAIL SECTION &
THICKNESS
PROVIDE HATCHED ALL CUTTING POSITIONS

PROVIDE BOTH SIDE PICTURE TO ACH ROOMS.


WE ARE NOT FIND ANY PHOTOS IN ROO ENTRY
SIDE FOR QC.

PROVIDE INSIDE DOOR & WINDOWS


RECHECK ALL WINDOWS IN STAIRCASE

WE FOUND ONLY ONE PHOTO OF ELV. PROVIDE


MORE PHOTOS IN FOLDER & EACH ELV's
DRAWING TITLE BOXES
DRAW ALL SYMBOLS ARE PERFECTLY

PROVIDE PROJECT ID IN EVERY TITLE BOX.

REMOVE UNNECESSERY DRAWINGS


PROVIDE ALL INFORMATION CORRECTLY.

USE PROPER HATCHES LINE WEIGHT


REMOVE UNNECESSERY SYMBOLS

PROVIDE ALL SYMBOLS CAREFULLY


REMOVE BLANK DAMMAGE TABLE

REMOVE REAPETED INFORMATIONS

USE FORMAL & POPULER TEXT FORMATES. TRY


TO USE MORE VISSIBLE COLORIN SECTION CUT
LINE WITH STANDARD SYMBOLE
USE FORMAL & POPULER TEXT FORMATES IN
DIMENSION. REPLACE THE DIMENSION LINES A
LITTLE DISTANCE AWAY.

USE ARCHITECTURAL & ENGINEERING


SYMBOLES FOR ALL DRAWINGS
AS-PER ELV PROVIDE IN ALL SECTION
DRAWINGS

MATCH COLOR TO SAME OBJECTS


MATCH TEXTURE LINEWEIGHT

PROVIDE ONE ZIP FILE WITH INCLUDE ALL QC


INFORMATIONS
DAMMAGE PHOTOS ADD IN PHOTO FOLDER

PROVIDE MORE ELV PHOTOS & REMOVE


UNNECESSARY PHOTO FOLDER

STAIR PHOTO PROVIDE STORIED WISE.


PROVIDE ALL IREQUIRED INFORMATIONS & FILL
UP WITH PROPER GUIDLINE

LINTEL ID NOT MATCHED & RE-CHECK ALL


WALLS THICKNESS
LINTEL ID NOT MATCHED & RE-CHECK ALL
WALLS THICKNESS
Explanation of QC

Name: Baunia Abdul Jalil High School ID: 4677271139-sub

Feedback for the STRUCTURAL Drawing


status
NO Subject (Red: Not Location/ Reference
OK)

1 Column 0

2 Column longsection 0
3 Beam 0

4 Beam and Exposure 0

5 Column abd Exposure 0


6 Foundation 0

7 Foundation 0
of QC

Date: 2021-08-08

CTURAL Drawing
ation/ Reference JV Explanation

Ferro scan report and column schedule does not match.


Rebar arrangement totally change according to ferro
scan report. So check all the data in column schedule
and incorporate the Ferro scan data

Try to give more details in long section like the sample


one(Right side) .
The beam schedule do not match with Ferro report, so
incorporate the Ferro report and exposure with beam
schedule.

At FB-7 in third floor the rebar does not match with


exposure and beam schedule and I did not find the
scanning folder for that portion ferro scan before
exposure. Every Items should be in different folder
based which is mentioned in checklist. So check all the
beam schedule according to ferro scan and compare
with exposure and if findings any different than give
notes.

Column schedule and exposure and Ferro scanning


report do not match. Check all the related items.
Check the footing dimension with filed sketch, I found
both footing dimension is almost same but the field
sketch is not same.

Input the missing mesurement in mark position


Explanation of QC

Name: Baunia Abdul Jalil High School ID: 4677271139-sub

1-Feedback for the MEP Drawing


status
NO Subject (Red: Not Location/ Reference
OK)

1 Elevation (heigjht) of piping shall be clarified. 0

Show each point of inlet at wet areas with height (basin


2 point, bib-cock, push shower etc) from floor level with 0
pictures.

A sewage plan shall be provided in autocad format in


3 0
elevation. (both vertical and horizontal piping)

A sewage plan shall be provided in autocad format with


4 0
pictures.
A complete plan of drainage system at the site for both
5 0
rain and sewage system shall be provided.

6 Others corrections. 0

Explanation of QC

Cable routes (In exposed condition) shall be


1
demonstrated in the autocad drawings with pictures. 0

Technical specifications of cables such as the size and


2
watt shall be presented (Cable Picture) 0
Outlet and inlet of cables of building and MDB SDB shall
3
be presented in the drawings with pictures 0

Outlet and inlet of cables of wet area like toilet shall be


4
presented in the drawings with cable size 0

Socket outlet plan shall be presented in the drawings


5
with pictures. 0

All the MDB, SDB picture mention in drawing by locating


6 0
in layout.
tion of QC

Date: 2021-08-08

he MEP Drawing
ation/ Reference JV Explanation

Elevation of inlet of OHWT from roof floor not shown.

No detailing of basin water inlet and basin height. There is detailing in


legend table but the basin sign and colour doesn't match with plan
drawing. Bathroom floors are up from usual floor level. So lifted portion
need to mention in drawing and it is related with the other points (bib-
cock, water inlet) height.

Horizontal piping over each bathroom where both sewage line connected
with each other with long trap, bend and TEE then horizontally connected
with vertical line which passes sludge to soil stack.

Horizontal piping over each bathroom is missing. No detailing of


horizontal piping.
Horizontal piping over each bathroom is missing. No detailing of
horizontal piping.

1. Pipes spreaded on roof are water distribution pipe. 2. Cleaning


out route is not clear. Does it exposed to outside or does it clear manually
and periodically.

Exposed wire route not shown in any place whereas there are lots of
exposed wire as per pictures.

No detailing of energy meter. Inlet at energy meter and outlet from energy
meter not given. Technical specification of SDB has not given. Need to
demonstrate in diagram format. SDB need numbering as there are many
SDB.
Outlet and inlet of SDB not given. Not even in legend table. No
technical specification given for SDB.

Inlet or light point or any other electric point not shown in


drawing.

No socket outlet plan given in drawing.

SDB numbering not done and need specific identification of


picture of each SDB. Mentioned MDB size in legend not exists.

You might also like