Professional Documents
Culture Documents
V1
The title was clear, accurate, and
Report Title unambiguous. It clearly communicates the
● Is the title clear, accurate, and study's topic and objective, which was to
unambiguous? isolate and identify etiological agents from
clinical samples and assess their susceptibility
to commonly used antibiotics.
V1
V2
The research report logically follows the
phases of the research process. A sufficient
background on the prevalence of E. coli-
caused urinary tract infections (UTI) was
presented to emphasize the importance of
better control treatment of these illnesses. The
authors then went on to discuss the materials
and procedures utilized in the investigation,
with the goal of determining the etiological
agents and evaluating their antibiotic
susceptibility. Per test, the method of data
collecting was thoroughly described. The
results and debate were then presented,
including tables and figures to help with visual
representation. Lastly, the study's findings
were summarized in a concise conclusion.
V3
The literature review is well-organized in the
article. In the introduction, several journals
were used to provide background for UTI, its
causative agents and the prevalence of
antibiotic resistance. Furthermore, the
discussion is also composed by various
studies to support the result of the study.
Overall, the review provides a balanced
critical analysis of the literature.
Theoretical Framework
● Is there an identified conceptual or There is no identified conceptual or theoretical
theoretical framework? framework.
● If yes, was it adequately described
and is the framework appropriate?
V1
Aims/Objectives/Research
Question/Hypotheses The aim of the study, mentioned in the
"Introduction" part, was to "isolate and
● Have aims and objectives, a
research question or hypothesis ✓ determine the etiologic agents from clinical
been clearly identified? samples and evaluate their susceptibility to
● If yes, are they clearly stated and normally used antibiotics". This was explicitly
reflect the information presented in stated, which was also extensively supported
the literature review? by the literature review provided in the study.
Sample/Population V1
● Has the target population been The study mentioned in the materials and
clearly identified? methods that the samples were collected from
● How were the sample selected? patients infected with UTI. The patients were
● Is it of adequate size? registered in the research and the urine
● Are the inclusion/exclusion criteria samples were obtained aseptically for
clearly identified? microbial culture. It was placed in a sterile
containers with properly labelled name, age,
and sex of the patients. They were cultured
immediately after collection.
V2
The target population has been clearly
identified. It was indicated under “Materials
and Methods” that the samples were collected
from 70 UTI infected patients that were
registered in this research. It was also stated
that the urine samples were aseptically
collected in sterile containers and
appropriately labelled with the name, age, and
sex of the patient.
V1
The process of acquiring ethics approval and
informed consent was not explicitly stated in
Ethical Considerations the study although, it was mentioned the
samples were collected from patients that
● Were the participants fully
registered for the study.
informed about the nature of the
research? V2
● Was the confidentiality of the
participants guaranteed? The 70 patients involved in the study were not
● Was ethical permission granted for mentioned to be informed about the nature of
the study? the research. At the same time, the
confidentiality of the participants was not said
to be guaranteed. The ethical permission grant
was not seen in the study.
Study Design The study design was not clearly indicated, but
✓ you can infer that the study design is a
● Is the research design clearly
quantitative, descriptive study design.
identified?
Methodology ✓ The data gathering instrument is appropriate.
The study was conducted at the Tehsil
● Has the data gathering instrument
Headquarter hospital in Pakistan, wherein
been described and is it
appropriate? samples were taken from 70 registered
patients and immediately cultured after
collection. It was discussed in the study how
the specimens were processed. It was first
cultured, then stained to confirm the identity of
the pathogens and bacteria. After it underwent
a biochemical test, then antimicrobial
susceptibility testing, then disk diffusion
technique, then the transfer of inoculums, and
then the reading of the plates and the
interpretation of the result. The results were
then discussed, and figures and tables were
presented to summarize the study's findings.
The discussion and conclusion reflect the
statistics, which were in percentages and
frequencies. They were presented in a tabular
form which made it easier for readers to draw
conclusions from. The findings were also
supported with literature that were sufficient to
form a conclusion.
V2
Yes, the discussion and conclusion of the
study states that females are more prone to
Data Analysis and Results UTI compared to males which is true based
● Do the conclusions and discussion from the results of the study wherein female
reflect the calculated statistics patients have a prevalence rate of 68% with
(example: mean, p values, or ✓ males only at 32%. Both male and female
confidence intervals)? patients were also sensitive to the following
● Were the results presented clearly antibiotics TZP, FOS, F, IMP, AK, and SCF
and sufficiently to enable to draw and resistant to AM, AMC, CFX, SXT, DO,
conclusions? CIP, CEF, and CRO which do reflect the
results of the antibiotic sensitivity of E. coli
among male and female patients with UTI.
References
Coughlan, M., Cronin, P., & Ryan, F. (2007). Step-by-step guide to critiquing research. Part 1: quantitative
research. British Journal of Nursing (Mark Allen Publishing) , 16(11), 658–663.
https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2007.16.11.23681
Sullivan. (2008). Critical Appraisal for Research Papers Appraisal Checklist & Guide Questions .