QR 502: QUALITATIVE RESEARCH METHOD

TASK NO. 3

Name of Student: Ms. Mervi C. Badar

Name of Teacher: Dr. Marife M. Lacaba

APPROVED TITLE: Araling Panlipunan in the Pandemic Era: Challenges, Perspective and Learning Interests
RESEARCH INSTRUMENTATION VALIDATION OF SAMPLING DATA GATHERING DATA ANALYSIS ETHICAL
DESIGN ( DATA INSTRUMENT PROCEDURE PROCEDURE CONSIDERATION
COLLECTION)
Hermeneutic
Phenological
It allows For data collection In actual testing is Homogenous I will use two data In qualitative Ethical
collection of using face-to-face recommended. Sampling. It is a collection methods: research, the initial considerations affect
experiences and interviews. When type of purposive appearance of data all phases of the
The main purpose of autobiography and
reflective analysis . using the sampling useful is insignificant, research process,
semi-structured
a actual testing is to
Phenomenological phenomenological when a researcher because layers of from proposal to
interviews
have a panel of
method is employed approach during the wants to study a meanings may be publication. They
experts in the
because the interviews, the main phenomenon or Autobiography will masked; relate to the
profession of the
researcher will ask aim is to gain a trend as it relates to enable me to enquire interpretation is research topics, the
study review the
the Challenges, deeper what are considered into my participants’ essential to decipher questions, the social
research protocol lived experiences and
Perspective and understanding of the "typical" or the multi-layered contexts of the
and interview represent them in a
Learning Interests of nature or meaning of "average" members meanings of human research, the
questions to ensure narrative form that will
Araling Panlipunan everyday of the effected experiences. relationship between
they align to the provide rich data.
in the Pandemic experiences population. the researcher and
Autobiography is a
purpose statement The
Era . (Munhall, 2007). The Homogeneous medium enabling
the researched, and
and research interactional/dialogical
directive of the sampling is used reflection on the the researcher’s own
questions. approach combines
questions and the when the goal of the influences and philosophies. It is
manner in which the research is to vital for the
And participant or changes throughout and extends the
researchers ask them understand and researcher to
respondent his/her experiences. It thematic and structural
during the interview describe a particular acknowledge the
validation, is a approaches. Stories
affects the way the group in depth. gives new meanings possible impact of
do not happen in a
technique for
participants tell their to our past events and the research on the
void but are told and
exploring the The Pi-
stories. This will, in actions and let us heard in settings which participants.
credibility of results. Phenomenon of examine the outcomes
some ways, limit the encompass historical,
Data or results are Interest The Pi- in light of our present The proposed
potential new data dialogical, institutional
returned to Phenomenon of and plan for future research will
given by the and discursive values,
participants to check Interest describes outcomes. and involve people, maintain the highest
participants and
for accuracy and the incident, groups, society and ethical standards.
affect the richness of Predetermined open-
resonance with their activities, process, culture. Participants will be
the information ended questions in
experiences. values, perceptions, provided with a brief
collected. semi-structured It analyses dialogues
attitude, beliefs and information form,
interviews will elicit the to understand the
experiences of respondents’ which will state that
characteristics of
health, illness, underlying attitudes phenomena that go their participation in
healthcare and beliefs. This beyond the mere the research is
treatment, program, flexible method will discourse analysis.
voluntary, before
service (Jack et al., allow me to probe The analysis of text giving informed
2019). A qualitative emerging ideas during and the way it is consent. Privacy will
research question the interview. articulated still has be protected by
must contain the significance, assigning pennames
I will begin by using
phenomenon of to them and their
stimuli – relevant
interest. institutions. They will
reading materials,
be treated
scenarios or
respectfully and
anecdotes – to
prompt participants nonjudgmentally and
to write about of will be able to
their personal and withdraw from the
academic research at any time
experiences
covering one
specific event at a
time. I will re-read
the
autobiographical
accounts in order to
identify gaps and
hence generate
questions for semi-
structured
interviews.
Interviews will
begin with a general
question related to
or extended from
the
autobiographical
data and previous
participants’
questionnaire
responses. Then I
will ask questions to
elaborate on
experiences that
participants
described in their
autobiographies. In
the data collection
process, subjectivity
will inevitably be
present. In
autobiographies,
thoughts and
writings are never
value-free but
rather are situated
in nature.

Autobiographical
data collection will
be influenced by my
thoughts and
perspectives as well
as my roles as
researcher and
participant. My own
life experiences in
terms of statuses,
influences and
teachings will also
add bias. However,
by conforming to
policy guidelines
and ethical codes
and my own values
and ethics, the
credibility of the
research will be
ensured.