LRIZAL

Submitted To: Mrs. Vilma Deponio

Submitted By:

Group Leader: All members

Group members: Mr. Joshua Galangan

Mr. Jan Ritz Laoyan
Mr. Neiljanson Humiwat
Mr. Chris Ignas
Mr. Dhane Jhaye Laboreda

Introduction Of Dr. Jose Rizal’s Life

Jose Rizal (1861-1896) was a national hero of the Philippines and the
first Asian nationalist. He expressed the growing national consciousness
of many Filipinos who opposed Spanish colonial tyranny and aspired to
attain democratic rights.
Activity 4.
RA NO.1425

They both stand for what they fight for, and they have reasonable/valid
opinion, only same way on how they’re working on act that they most
trust, and they always keep God inside them.

Those who are favor of RA NO.1425 particularly includes the novels of

Rizal in the curricula of all schools to promulgate rules and regulations,
including those of disciplinary nature; to carry out and enforce the
provision of the act. They comprised those who studied the biography
and the work studies regarding to DR. Jose Rizal, they said our
nationality identity embraced by both catholic and non- catholic
Filipinos and they want it passed as law, this law must learn buy the
students to increase nationalism to improve individual identity.

Those are said against RA NO.1425, said Rizal law violates the Catholic
rights to conscience and religion and would lead to the degradation of
Catholic values and morality of it is passed, the board shall promulgate
rule and regulations providing for the exemption of students for reasons
of religious belief stated in a sworn written statement, its shall be
construed as amendment or repealing section nine hundred twenty-
seven of the administrative code. They didn’t accept Rizal and his
works, which critical to the Catholic church. Claims that Rizal violated
the cannon law 1399, which forbids books from attacking the Catholic
Church.
Activity 5.
Parallelism of Rizal Law and RH Law

The catholic hierarchy are not willing to approved the RA NO.1425 and
RH law cause they both passed into law, they intended to draw a
parallelism with the equality fevered battle to pass the Rizal law in the
1950’s; the law which mandated that all educational institution in the
country offer about Rizal and his works, was vehemently opposed by the
catholic hierarchy when it was proposed in 1955.
In a line now echoed by anti-RH legislator, opponents of the Rizal law
argued that the legislation violated the “freedom of conscience and
religion” of Filipino Catholics. This was because of Rizal’s writings,
specifically his Novels. This act was call for an increase sense of
nationalism from the Filipinos during the time of dwindling Filipino
identity. Certainly, catholic churches not indicate RA NO.1425 as their
will of law because of hierarchy that they pass through, historic step
forward for all women in the Philippines, empowering them to make
their own decisions about their health and families and participate more
fully and equally in their society.