Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Sample Pamphlet - Freshman Orientation 2
Sample Pamphlet - Freshman Orientation 2
HANDBOOK
Hello Freshman!
Congratulations, you’re on the right track in the pursuit
of the Study of Law.
This handbook is a basic guide on how to appease the
jealous mistress, Law School. We encourage you to acquaint
yourselves to the contents of this lifesaver as you start your
journey in the Study of Law.
In this handbook, you will learn:
o The general DOs and DON’Ts of Law School;
o The course outline of the Study of Law;
o The pre-requisite subjects as mandated by the
LEB;
o The proper dress code and sanctions for violation
thereof;
o How to:
o Make case digests
o Ideally answer exam questions;
o General Calendar of Activities.
Best of luck and welcome to the Liceo de Cagayan
University College of Law.
- The Law Student Organization
What to do? What NOT to do?
“Intelligence plus character – that is the goal
of true education.”.
- Martin Luther King, Jr.
SCHEDULE:
Mondays, Tuesdays, and Thursdays
N.B.: Spartan slippers, tattered jeans, sleeveless [ignore the model above]
tops/dresses, skirts/shorts more than three (3) inches above-the-
knee short are not allowed.
MORE CLARIFICATIONs on the Dress Code
“The first thing you do is to get the Proper Citation and then proceed to
retrieve the entire text of the decision either through the following ways:
1. Photocopy the decision from the SCRA [Supreme Court Reports
Annotated];
2. Download a copy from the internet available from several websites.
[There’s LawPhil, ChanRobles, sc.judiciary.gov, eSCRA,
elibrary.judiciary.gov]
Upon securing a copy of the entire text, read the decision first. Do not
peak at the dispositive portion so as to allow you to appreciate the manner and
approach utilized by the Supreme Court in resolving the issue raised before it.
Atty. David Robert Aquino, CSEE, believes that it takes at least two
readings. The first reading should at least give you a gist of the case as well as
familiarize you with the issues raised. The second reading, done more slowly this
time, allows you to appreciate the novelty of the issues, the arguments presented
as well as how the Supreme Court resolves the same. After reading you are now
ready to begin digesting your case.
First, list down the material and pertinent facts. Disregard unnecessary
information as they will just clutter your work. If the assignment is about the
relationship between the employer-employee – then focus on facts that have a
bearing on the same.
Second, list down the issues raised as well as the arguments that support
it.
Finally, note down how the Supreme Court resolved each issued raised
taking into consideration the pertinent law and applicable jurisprudence it used.
Once you have done all the above, you are now ready to begin your
summary. The style, however, is unique to each individual. For new students, it is
highly advised that you follow as a guide the writing styles of your judicial writer.
So long as you have aptly digested a case in an orderly and presentable manner –
it doesn’t matter if your style is different from your classmate. Each one of us has
our own way of telling a story and digesting cases is one of them. “
The general format for case digests that is usually followed goes like this:
Title of the case: [ex. Chi Ming Tsoi vs. Court of Appeals and Gina
Lao-Tsoi]
Docket No.: [ex. G.R. 119190]
Date: [ex. 16 January 1997]
Topic: Psychological Incapacity
Example
Question: Joe was 17 years old when he committed homicide in 2005. The
crime is punishable by reclusion temporal. After two years in hiding, he was
arrested and appropriately charged in May 2007. Since R.A. 9344 (Juvenile
Justice and Welfare act of 2006) was already in effect, Joe moved to avail
of the process of intervention or diversion.
Suppose Joe’s motion for intervention or diversion was denied, and
he was convicted two (2) years later when Joe was already 21 years old.
Should the judge apply the suspension of sentence? Explain.
Plausible Answer:
[Categorical and direct answer] No, the application of
sentence may only be availed of BEFORE the accused turns 21
years old. [Legal basis] Although it is stated in Sec. 38 of R.A. 9344
that suspension of sentence may be availed even if the accused
is beyond 18 years old PROVIDED that the accused was a minor
when he committed the offense; however, recent jurisprudence
has provided that once these kind of offenders turn the age of 21,
they can no longer avail suspension of sentence. [Application of
the rule] In the situation presented, Joe may have been a minor
when he committed homicide and at the time of his arrest, RA 9344
already took effect and he was no longer a minor. [Conclusion]
Thus, on the basis of recent jurisprudence, the judge should not
apply the suspension of sentence on Joe’s case.