Professional Documents
Culture Documents
OCTOBER 2020
WELDING JOURNAL • VOLUME 99 NUMBER 10 • OCTOBER 2020
Cobot
Welding
Welding
Automation
PUBLISHED BY THE AMERICAN WELDING SOCIETY TO ADVANCE THE SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY, AND APPLICATION OF WELDING
AND ALLIED JOINING AND CUTTING PROCESSES WORLDWIDE, INCLUDING BRAZING, SOLDERING, AND THERMAL SPRAYING
Cover 2 Select Arc.qxp_FP_TEMP 9/10/20 3:22 PM Page C2
FP template WJ.qxp_FP_TEMP 9/9/20 5:35 PM Page 1
Page 2 Donaldson.qxp_FP_TEMP 9/9/20 5:46 PM Page 2
October 2020.qxp_Layout 1 9/10/20 3:35 PM Page 3
At the American Welding Society (AWS), we are actively following the Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19) outbreak. The welding and
fabrication industries have been determined to be an essential business, especially as it relates to repair and maintenance
of key infrastructure. The content of the October 2020 issue of the Welding Journal is intended to be accurate when
published, but we recognize that we are in a rapidly changing situation. For AWS’s official statement on COVID-19, as well as
the latest updates and frequently asked questions, please visit aws.org.
DEPARTMENTS
6 Editorial 45 Certification Schedule
7 Press Time News 46 Welding Workbook
8 Washington Watchword 47 Society News
10 News of the Industry 49 Tech Topics
14 Arc-Tist Corner 55 Section News
16 Aluminum Q&A 61 Guide to AWS Services
18 Brazing Q&A 62 Personnel
20 Education Inspiration 67 Classifieds
23 Letters to the Editor 68 Advertiser Index
24 Product & Print Spotlight
On the cover: A cobot lends a hand
to boost weld shop productivity.
(Credit: Universal Robots USA and
Vectis Automation.)
EDITORIAL
The election for president of the United to further their education and training in the
States will take place next month, and it field.
comes at a most challenging time. We have Our Welding Workforce Grant program
tragically lost many lives to COVID-19, but continues to help schools expand training ca-
our country has also shown resilience and a pabilities to create more welders to support
dedication to forging a new path forward. local businesses and the economy. More than
Included in that path forward must be a $850,000 in grants have been awarded since
renewed focus on manufacturing in the Unit- the program began in 2017.
ed States. The COVID-19 pandemic has un- One of our newest initiatives, the Light a
covered the impact from decades of off- Spark Grant, provides starter welding equip-
shoring critical manufacturing and supply ment packages for high schools that did not
chains. Our inability to manufacture impor- previously offer welding. This grant will al-
William Rice tant medical devices, pharmaceuticals, and low hundreds of students each year to expe-
Chair, AWS Foundation protective equipment have put our country rience welding for the first time and open
at greater risk. More importantly, it revealed their eyes to the many opportunities avail-
that a reliance on offshore production by able in the profession.
“Welding many industries can send damaging ripples One of our flagship programs to expose
professionals and through an entire supply chain during a young people to welding, the Careers in
businesses will be global disruption. Welding Mobile Exhibit, has unfortunately
essential to the The two men vying to become president been sidelined this year with the cancellation
reindustrialization have different views on nearly every issue, of most events due to the pandemic. Howev-
but one area of common ground is the need er, the AWS Foundation and partner Lincoln
of America, and it is to reindustrialize America, both to maintain Electric remain committed to this important
critical that we put our resilience and to grow our economy. In- endeavor and look forward to having the
a focus on training vestments need to be made at every level of trailer back on the road in 2021.
and educating the government and throughout the private sec- While we may not have been able to meet
next generation of tor to increase our competitiveness and self- everyone face-to-face this year, we increased
leaders for our reliance. our ability to engage digitally. Articles, blog
A national prioritization of innovation, posts, and videos related to careers in weld-
industry.” manufacturing, and infrastructure will mean ing have regularly been featured on
further demand for skilled tradespeople, in- weldingdigest.com and AWS social media
cluding welders. The need for welding pro- channels, some with views reaching in the
fessionals was high before the pandemic and tens of thousands.
will be even higher if we, as a country, can Careersinwelding.com remains the go-to
commit to this reindustrialization. source for information on careers, salaries,
Aside from the prospects of future de- educational opportunities, and more. We
mand, a career in welding has become an in- continue to add additional content, such as a
triguing option for young people and career page devoted to veterans, and resources for
changers during this pandemic, as most welding educators, a few specifically to assist
states deemed welding organizations as “es- with remote learning. Continued improve-
sential businesses.” Many engineers, techni- ments to the site, as well as new digital ini-
cians, technical sales staff, and other person- tiatives, are planned for 2021.
nel experienced less disruption than their Our country will re-emerge from this pan-
counterparts in industries such as tourism demic under a new normal. Exactly what it
and hospitality. The pandemic has highlight- will look like is yet to be determined. But we
ed the importance of these jobs in keeping do know that it will include a new apprecia-
our country running. tion and commitment to making things with
The American Welding Society (AWS) our own hands here in the United States.
Foundation (aws.org/foundation) remains a Welding professionals and businesses will
driving force to encourage people to see the be essential to the reindustrialization of
opportunity of a career in the welding indus- America, and it is critical that we put a focus
try and to support their path in achieving on training and educating the next genera-
that goal. tion of leaders for our industry. As welders
Last year, we awarded scholarships total- remain essential, so too is the work of the
ing $1.5 million to more than 1000 students AWS Foundation. WJ
Secure Your Spot for the AWS Education 2020 They are providing trade school students scholarship fund-
Virtual Summit ing while teaming up to launch two special-edition boots in-
spired by the legendary rock band. The Wolverine Metallica
Though FABTECH, originally set to take place November Scholars 1000 Mile Axel and Hellcat UltraSpring™ boots are
18–20 in Las Vegas, Nev., has been canceled, interested indi- available, with 100% of the proceeds benefitting AWMH
viduals may take part in the American Welding Society’s Metallica Scholars recipients to support the skilled trades.
(AWS’s) welding education programs during this same The 1000 Mile Axel limited-edition boot is based on the
timeframe. Wolverine 1000 Mile boot silhouette with a Metallica Key
Register to save your seat for AWS Education 2020, the logo-inspired metal heel plate, an AWMH metal toe kicker,
Society’s virtual summit, at aws.org/virtual2020. metal-tipped laces, and a metal guitar pick tag. It uses Chica-
Included among its highlights will be the following features: go-based Horween Chromexcel leather, silver hardware,
• AWS Professional Program, educational programs, and and a Vibram lugged outsole.
seminars The Hellcat UltraSpring boot combines traditional work
• Opportunity to earn professional development hours boot durability with the Wolverine UltraSpring™ cushioning.
for attending educational programs and workshops Its features include a custom-molded Metallica Key logo
• Access to the best of AWS programs stitched on the boot and a custom metal Metallica Scholars
• Live streams of award ceremonies, presentations, and guitar pick tag.
other events. Both boots are sold exclusively on wolverine.com.
The partnership will benefit three community college
DOE Awards Millions to EPRI for Advancing trade programs across the country — Grand Rapids Com-
munity College, Grand Rapids, Mich.; Lone Star College,
Modular-in-Chamber Electron Beam Houston, Tex.; and WSU Tech, Wichita, Kans. — with each
Welding Capabilities receiving a $100,000 joint grant from Wolverine and Metal-
lica Scholars, as well as Wolverine boots to help students get
The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Washington, D.C., started in their career.
has presented an award of $5.1 million to Electric Power Re-
search Institute Inc. (EPRI), headquartered in Palo Alto, Calif.,
for developing modular-in-chamber electron beam welding ca-
Kawasaki Introduces K-EDU Virtual Training
pabilities. These advanced capabilities will be used for a future The Kawasaki Training Center, Wixom, Mich., has made
reactor demonstration project. some of its most popular courses accessible from any loca-
The award came through the Office of Nuclear Energy’s tion using an online training platform. With K-EDU virtual
funding opportunity announcement, U.S. Industry Opportuni- training, students may attend courses such as standard op-
ties for Advanced Nuclear Technology Development. erations and programming (T and E controllers), AS lan-
The project will demonstrate a 10-ft-diameter, 4.375-in.- guage, Cubic-S safety configuration and setup, plus more in
thick vessel electron beam weld in less than 90 min of welding development.
time. Additionally, it will establish the capability of modular- The company’s K-ROSET simulation software is used to
in-chamber electron beam welding to perform major reactor give remote students a realistic robot programming experi-
pressure vessel girth welds for a NuScale Power reactor pres- ence. Through the virtual teaching platform, trainers explain
sure vessel design and develop manufacturing process plans concepts using collaborative white boards and utilize virtual
based on technology and required postweld inspection/heat breakout rooms for individualized attention.
treatment. Contact training@kri-us.com for course dates and availabil-
ity, or visit https://robotics.kawasaki.com/userAssets1/pdf/
Wolverine and Metallica Release Boots to Training_Calendar.pdf.
Provide Funding for Trade Programs
MFG Day 2020 Goes Online
Manufacturing (MFG) Day, and the industry’s month-long
celebration it kicks off, will be different this year. In lieu of stu-
dents touring factories, technical schools, and more in person,
they will have the opportunity to do so virtually. Manufactur-
ers will show parents, teachers, and students what careers in
today’s advanced manufacturing industry look like thanks to
virtual programming.
In advance of this year’s MFG Day, which is October 2, The
All proceeds from the Wolverine Metallica Scholars collab- Manufacturing Institute, the workforce and education partner
oration boots will be used to educate trade students
through the Metallica Scholars Initiative.
of the National Association of Manufacturers, Washington,
D.C., held a webinar to help manufacturers plan virtual events.
It detailed what manufacturers should do, such as reach out to
Wolverine, Rockford, Mich., the 137-year-old boot brand, local associations and regional groups to see if there is an ex-
and heavy metal band Metallica’s nonprofit All Within My isting event they can co-host or participate in; offered advice
Hands (AWMH) are partnering to help build the future Ameri- on how to host their own virtual event; and provided examples
can workforce. from the field. Visit creatorswanted.org to acces the recording. WJ
WASHINGTON WATCHWORD
Tariffs Reinstated on Canadian Aluminum • Increase the standard R&D tax credit from 20 to 40%;
• Increase the alternative simplified credit from 14 to 28%;
The United States has renewed 10% tariffs on imports of • Increase the credit for firms with no history of R&D in
nonalloyed aluminum from Canada. In 2019, the United the past 3 years from 6 to 14%; and
States removed all tariffs on steel and aluminum imports • Increase the startup credit against payroll taxes from
from Canada as part of the United States-Mexico-Canada $250,000 to $500,000.
Agreement (USMCA). However, under the USMCA, if surges
in imports of these steel or aluminum products occur, the
United States may re-impose tariffs on those products. In SEC Revises Proxy Advisory Firm Rule
recent months, that is exactly what has occurred. Canadian
imports of nonalloyed aluminum have increased substan- Responding to long-standing complaints of an outsized
tially and U.S. aluminum consumption has decreased signifi- role played by proxy advisory firms in corporate elections
cantly. In light of this surge, and in keeping with the terms and other matters subject to shareholder votes, the Securi-
of the USMCA, the United States re-imposed the 10% ad ties and Exchange Commission (SEC) has amended its rules
valorem additional duty on imports of nonalloyed aluminum to ensure that clients of proxy voting advice businesses have
from Canada. reasonable and timely access to more transparent, accurate,
and complete information on which to make voting deci-
sions. The amendments aim to facilitate the ability of those
OSHA Announces Final Beryllium Standard for who use proxy voting advice (i.e., investors and others who
General Industry vote on investors’ behalf) to make informed voting deci-
sions.
The U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration
(OSHA) has published a final rule revising the beryllium
standard for general industry. The final rule includes White House Releases Fiscal Year 2022
changes designed to clarify the standard and simplify or R&D Priorities
improve compliance. Additionally, it amends the following
paragraphs of the beryllium standard for general industry: The White House Office of Management and Budget and
definitions, methods of compliance, personal protective the Office of Science and Technology Policy have issued their
clothing and equipment, hygiene areas and practices, house- annual memorandum describing priorities for R&D for fiscal
keeping, medical surveillance, hazard communication, and year 2022. The memorandum is intended to direct federal
recordkeeping. The standard also has a new addendum — agencies as they develop their fiscal year 2022 budget pro-
Appendix A: Operations for Establishing Beryllium Work Ar- posals. The following lists the
eas. The compliance date of this final standard as modified areas of focus.
was September 14, 2020. • Advanced manufacturing: Priorities include smart and
digital manufacturing and advanced industrial robotics, es-
pecially systems enabled by the industrial internet of things.
OSHA Issues Updated FAQs on Masks An area of particular importance is the development of nano
and advanced materials and processes in the biomedical arena.
The U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration • Advanced military capabilities: The focus is on meeting
(OSHA) has updated its series of frequently asked questions emerging threats and protecting American security into the
(FAQs) regarding the use of masks in the workplace. The FAQs future, including offensive and defensive hypersonic
now indicate that OSHA “generally recommends that em- weapons capabilities, resilient national security space
ployers encourage workers to wear face coverings at work” systems, and modernized and flexible strategic and non-
but does not mandate it. The FAQs further state that “face strategic nuclear deterrent capabilities.
coverings are intended to prevent wearers who have COVID- • Semiconductors: Agencies are asked to prioritize invest-
19 without knowing it (i.e., those who are asymptomatic ments to ensure government access to trusted and assured
or presymptomatic) from spreading potentially infectious microelectronics and continued American leadership in
respiratory droplets to others. This is known as “source semiconductor technologies. This includes the underlying
control.” materials, devices, designs, and software, as well as the fab-
rication and characterization tools and facilities, required
for advanced microelectronics.
R&D Tax Credit Bill Introduced for Business • American space leadership: R&D investments should
Startups continue to leverage efforts underway at American universi-
ties and in the private sector. These investments should
Legislation (H.R. 7766) has been added in the House that also focus on ensuring American leadership in space, includ-
would double the R&D tax credit and allow more small busi- ing a return to the Moon’s surface by 2024 for long-term
ness startups to access this credit. In particular, the bill exploration and utilization, as well as future human mis-
would do the following: sions to Mars. WJ
HUGH K. WEBSTER, AWS WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS OFFICE — Contact the AWS Washington Government Affairs Office at 1747
Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20006; email hwebster@wc-b.com; fax (202) 835-0243.
The Cobot Expo Brings Virtual Booth Visits and was free to attend and attracted 7500 registrants. It not
Keynote Sessions to Its Audience only offered American manufacturers flexible automation
solutions but also played host to more than 30 booths,
keynote sessions, interactive Q&As, and live chats.
The COVID-19 pandemic’s social constraints were an im- After connecting to the online event, participants en-
petus for Universal Robots (UR), headquartered in Odense, tered a virtual lobby with the following features:
Denmark, to debut America’s largest virtual collaborative ro- • Welcome Desk. This space was surrounded by interac-
bot expo and conference. Held July 28–30, The Cobot Expo tive guests who moved around and conversed.
Upon joining The Cobot Expo online, attendees could see and This screenshot shows UR’s cobot welding booth. Collabora-
hear a virtual lobby filled with guests, then go to various ex- tive robots can handle gas tungsten arc, laser, gas metal arc,
hibit halls and keynote sessions. ultrasonic, plasma arc, and spot welding.
• Access to Exhibit Halls from UR and Its Partners. • The New Normal in Manufacturing with Collabora-
Clicking on the exhibit hall screens allowed attendees to tive Robots. Led by Joe Campbell, head of marketing in
view booths overhead and up-close to gain insights on the North America for UR, this lecture looked at fundamental
most common cobot applications, such as machine tending, features of collaborative robots, how they are shaping the
packaging and palletizing, product inspection, assembly, factory automation playing field, and connecting those fea-
welding, dispensing, and finishing. Other offerings included tures to the challenge presented by COVID-19.
company descriptions, one-on-one chats with representa- He pointed out three areas of demand, as quoted below.
tives, video vaults for watching products in action, and re- “Companies are struggling to figure out how to deploy
sources with PDFs, which could be added to a “swag bag.” manufacturing lines to ensure worker safety and social dis-
• Admission to Keynote Sessions. Via an auditorium, tancing,” Campbell said. “We see a number of companies
showing more interactive guests, the speeches for each day that are trying to accelerate their reshoring efforts to make
were listed with countdown clocks until their start times. sure they don’t have a single supply chain that can be sev-
The following lists the highlights from two captivating ered by a global issue, such as the COVID crisis. Then we see
talks delivered during the virtual event. many companies that are recognizing that manufacturing
• Keynote from the UR President: Cobot Effective- flexibility is critically important.”
ness. Jürgen von Hollen shared visions and facts about He also detailed recent case studies, including one at All
UR, including its belief that robot automation, especially Axis Machining, Dallas, Tex. To socially distance manual la-
collaborative automation, should be made accessible to all bor and not turn away orders, it deployed eight UR10 cobots
types of companies (small, medium, and large). He re- for machine-tending tasks.
viewed its history and technologies, too. “Their employees feel comfortable going to work with the
“For Universal Robots, one of the most significant dif- social distancing that was enabled by the high productivity
ferences over the last years has been that we’ve moved of the cobots,” Campbell explained.
from being a pure product company to much more of an ap- Additional talks centered on choosing the right cobot
plications company,” von Hollen said. model and peripherals, deciding whether to take a do-it-
He also went over its belief concerning humans. “Our yourself approach or go with an integrator, and more.
human brain is stimulus seeking, so we want to learn, we In conclusion, carrying on during this time hasn’t been
want to discover, and we want to adapt,” von Hollen said. easy, but thanks to modern technology and hardworking
Therefore, not wasting potential is important. staff, certain events have been able to continue virtually.
Later, he touched on increased political/economic volatil- Visit universal-robots.com to learn more about The Cobot
ity and the COVID-19 crisis. “One of the most important Expo and read blogs, including a series on manufacturing in
things we can do is ensure flexibility,” von Hollen said. the age of COVID-19. — Kristin Campbell, managing editor
AWS Launches Professional Development and keep up with advances in their fields by learning from
Training, Debuts New Podcast Episode, and industry experts. They can enroll in a live, in-person semi-
nar or log into a webinar from their home/office while
Certifies Lakeshore Technical College as an ATF earning PDHs and CEUs upon course completion.
Is welding aluminum difficult . . . or just different? This
The American Welding Society (AWS), Miami, Fla., has
is the topic the first training program, Aluminum Welding
unveiled Professional Development Training, released the
for Fabricators, Inspectors, and Engineers, addresses
second episode of “Weld Wednesday with AWS,” and certi-
(aws.org/aluminum). Its six one-hour sessions over two
fied Lakeshore Technical College (LTC), Cleveland, Wis., as
weeks focuses on ways attendees can conduct aluminum
an Accredited Test Facility (ATF).
welding projects.
• AWS has developed a series of webinars. This ef-
“As part of our continuing efforts to address the needs
fort will help participants remain active and earn profes-
of our members, we are developing new, more specialized
sional development hours (PDHs) or continuing education
training opportunities for welders, inspectors, and engi-
units (CEUs). With the AWS Professional Development
neers,” said Alicia Garcia, AWS director of education and
Training sessions, attendees can broaden their skill sets
training. “We are excited to begin offering webinars and
seminars on a variety of topics that will allow industry per-
sonnel to stay current in their field of work and earn PDHs
and CEUs to meet the training requirements of their pro-
fessional certifications and licenses.”
Additional webinars and live seminars will be added
throughout the year (awo.aws.org).
• Listen to the new Weld Wednesday with AWS
podcast. This series, recently launched by AWS and the Arc
Junkies podcast, is accessible at aws.org/podcasts.
Episode 2 has the title “It’s Okay to Screw Things Up.”
Tune in as host Jason Becker interviews Nate Bowman, an
AWS Certified Welding Inspector, Certified Welding Educa-
Schaus Mechanical Welders Tyler Loeh and Trevor Giesler were tor, and Certified Welding Supervisor (CWS). They talk
reported to be among the first welders to become nationally about the process of becoming a CWS, its advantages,
certified at Lakeshore Technical College, Cleveland, Wis. and more.
ARC-TIST CORNER
AWS’s Arc 2 Art project pairs Barbie the Welder (left) and
Stephanie Hoffman in a creative venture to craft a smaller
version of the Statue of Liberty.
man and Barbie enthusiastically discussing the project on “I come from a much more technical, standards-style
Instagram Live — Fig. 2. The event attracted participants background. A lot of pipework, different codes and stan-
from around the world. Hoffman revealed her sketch for the dards. So my art still sometimes has a lot of fabrication in-
sculpture, which was inspired by the artwork on a sticker fluence,” said Hoffman. Her portion of the project includes
she had designed. The two artists also covered technical de- making the base, which will contain the AWS logo; AWS
tails, answered questions, and mused on what the statue D1.2 Structural Welding Code — Aluminum book and welding
means to them. helmet. She plans to try new-to-her techniques such as acid
“I think this sculpture really symbolizes coming together, etching and sculpting aluminum.
and the fact that at our core, [we], as Americans, are strong,” “I’m only going to be using two materials: aluminum and
Hoffman said. “We’re going to get through anything.” copper,” Hoffman said. “I thought it was really important
Barbie’s sentiments also reflected a popular national val- that we incorporate different types of material within this
ue. “[The statue] represents freedom to me. Welding gave project . . . So I wanted to make sure I contributed some-
me the freedom to do so much with my life. It’s given me so thing that is my personal favorite material to work with, and
many opportunities,” she said. that is aluminum.”
Barbie the Welder, as she’s commonly known, is a metal
sculptor from Erin, N.Y., who has been welding for 13 years. A Reveal to Remember
She’s created commissioned artwork for individual and cor-
porate clients, including a sculpture made completely out of The unveiling of the sculpture is planned for mid-Novem-
scrap for Harley Davidson’s 115th anniversary. Her diverse ber. Afterward, it is hoped the welder Lady Liberty will be a
repertoire includes figures of otherworldly creatures with centerpiece inside the Careers in Welding Trailer during its
humanoid bodies. This part of her work lends itself to her 2021 tour across the United States, showing visitors that
role in the project: crafting the body of the statue. The fig- welding goes beyond construction and pipelines.
ure will be framed out in ¼-in. round bar and covered with “Welding is an art before you do anything else with it,”
11-gauge steel sheet. Barbie concluded. “A person can pick up a torch and create
“If you think about a chocolate Easter bunny, how it’s hol- something. Whether it’s from a blueprint or not, they’re
low inside, it’s the same concept but 5 ft tall,” Barbie ex- artists. Fabrication is literally just a creation of art.” WJ
plained. “It’s going to push my skills past anything I’ve ever
done.”
She will also use 1⁄8-in. ER70S filler rod for welder Lady ALEXANDRA QUIÑONES (aquinones@aws.org) is associate editor of
Liberty’s hair, which will be in a ponytail. the Welding Journal.
Hoffman has been welding since her freshman year in
high school and spent her early career working in a shipyard
doing hydraulic pipe repair and anodized aluminum
pipework. She then took her experience from the dock to
the classroom, becoming a vocational school welding in-
structor. These days, she creates metal art from her New
Jersey shop and works as program manager of workforce
development for AWS.
ALUMINUM Q&A
BY TONY ANDERSON
7. In accordance with AWS D1.2/ e) There is no limit specified for this are used to describe the changes in
D1.2M:2014, Structural Welding Code weld. mechanical properties from expo-
— Aluminum, welding shall not be sure to specific heating processes.
performed in a wind exceeding Physically, the changes in the alu-
what speed? 9. Stress-corrosion cracking is a minum metal contributing to the
common issue in 5xxx series alu- strength during heat treating are:
a) 5 mph minum when alloys over 3% Mg are
b) 10 mph exposed to elevated service tem- a) Changes to the aluminum grain
c) 15 mph peratures (between 150° and structure
d) 20 mph 350°F). In the case of 5xxx series b) Precipitate formation and growth
e) Wind speed is not addressed in the weldments, this phenomenon is c) Solute segregation
code. caused by: d) Temperature-induced strain
hardening
a) Galvanic cells between the bulk Al e) None of the above
8. In accordance with AWS and the dissolved Mg
D1.2/D1.2M:2014, Structural Welding b) Secondary phases forming on metal TONY ANDERSON is director of aluminum
Code — Aluminum, when welding grain boundaries technology, ITW Welding North America.
5086 with 5356 using a welding c) Secondary phases forming in metal He is a Fellow of the British Welding
procedure specification (WPS) grain interiors Institute (TWI), is a Registered Chartered
Engineer with the British Engineering
qualified to D1.2, what is the maxi- d) Residual stress on welded joints Council, and holds numerous positions on
mum allowable increase in preheat e) Both a and d AWS technical committees. He is chair of
from that specified on the WPS? f) Both b and d the Aluminum Association Technical
Advisory Committee for Welding and author
of the book Welding Aluminum — Questions
a) An increase of > 25°F and Answers currently available from AWS.
b) An increase of > 50°F 10. When considering 2xxx, 6xxx, Questions may be sent to Tony Anderson
c) An increase of > 100°F and 7xxx series aluminum, the c/o Welding Journal, 8669 NW 36 St., #130,
Miami, FL 33166-6672, or via email at
d) An increase of > 150°F terms “aging” and “heat treatability” tony.anderson@millerwelds.com.
BRAZING Q&A
BY DAN KAY
EDUCATION INSPIRATION
BY JIM GALLOWAY
This college launched two programs to fulfill the increasing demand for welding automation
technicians and technologists
courses in this year. Students have the option of enrolling in courses covering offline programming software, seam track-
a 16-month paid co-op experience and transferring between ing, and vision systems. Support courses such as computer-
these programs up until the end of the second year. aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM),
As its name implies, there is a strong emphasis on au- programmable logic controller (PLC) programming, automa-
tomation in the final year of the MET-W&R program. The tion and tooling, hydraulics and pneumatics, quality assur-
college has invested in six robotic welding cells, in addition ance, and operations management and welding cost analysis
to other fixed automation systems (Table 1). There are in- fill out the specialized curriculum.
troductory courses in robotics and robotic welding in the Another key component of the final year of the MET-
second year, and in the final year there are more advanced W&R program is the technical capstone project, where stu-
dents design, manage, and implement an independent study
project related to the field. These projects are often conduct-
ed in partnership with local employers or other industrial
partners looking for real-world solutions. In this capstone
project, students may implement vision or adaptive control
technologies, develop and qualify a new welding procedure,
or produce and evaluate a product created by wire arc addi-
tive manufacturing in one of the robotic cells — Fig. 2.
Conestoga has responded to the increasing need for quali- welding requires accurate part preparation and fitup, and
fied shop-floor technicians to operate and maintain automat- therefore more end users are seeking skilled welder fitters
ed welding systems by launching a two-year technician level (metal fabricators), as well as robotic welding system opera-
program to support industry. The welding robotics technician tors and support by specialized technologists.
program has been designed to provide a way for one-year Conestoga College has responded by establishing welding
welding technique graduates to continue into the second year programs that are designed to develop a skilled workforce at
with advanced standing using a stacked credential — Fig. 1. all levels. New challenges such as teaching and working in a
This appeals to students seeking a more hands-on entry into COVID-19 environment have appeared in recent months.
the automated welding and fabricaton industry. However, with proper protocols, the most critical aspect of
Although a large part of the program’s focus is on robotic the programs, hands-on labs training, continues.
systems, other forms of welding and fabrication automation Firms implementing welding automation are facing tech-
are also included. Training on the operation of portable arc nological challenges, such as integrating robotic systems
welding and thermal cutting carriages, resistance spot weld- with coordinated motion, seam tracking, vision systems,
ing, orbital gas tungsten arc welding systems, fixed automa- and advanced welding processes; meeting stringent quality
tion such as a column and boom submerged arc welding, and requirements; and dealing with new alloy materials. Added
plasma arc cutting tables is included. This program offers a to this list is the ongoing struggle to recruit competent per-
four-month optional paid co-op term, allowing the students sonnel.
to gain work experience. Institutions developing the workforce to this level, such
This two-year program is appealing to workers seeking a as Conestoga College, require a strong faculty team and a sig-
second career in a field with a more stable future or to nificant investment by the institution in laboratory facilities
experienced welders who have been displaced by automa- and equipment. The ongoing support from industrial part-
tion. The automated system operator may also be expected ners, employers, and the OEM supply base is also critical to
to perform welding visual inspections and repair tasks as maintaining healthy trades and technology programs. WJ
part of the production process.
JIM GALLOWAY (jgalloway@conestogac.on.ca) teaches welding
Conclusion engineering technology at Conestoga College, Kitchener, Ontario,
Canada. He volunteers on several welding technical committees with
the Canadian Standards Association and is a Life Member of the
The undeniable fact is the drive toward welding and fab- American Welding Society.
rication automation is unstoppable. Successful automated
A Historic Look at PAUT sive, tricky to operate and set up, and You are correct in that UT first ap-
there were very few technicians skilled peared as Appendix C in 1969, when the
I would like to comment on the ar- in its application. Like many emerging standard was called Code for Welding in
ticle titled, “Challenges and Opportu- technologies, it was a lab toy for sever- Building Construction. It was moved to
nities for Welding Heavy Structural al years after its inception. Pulse-echo the main body of the code in 1972, when
Steel” by Robert E. Shaw in the April UT took 40 years from its inception it was retitled as Structural Welding
2020 Welding Journal. I would first like and 24 years from the production of Code and included both buildings and
to state that I consider myself a friend practical equipment before it was in- bridges. In the 1969 edition, the num-
of Bob Shaw and immensely respect troduced in the AWS code. bered clauses were considered suitable as
his knowledge and service on the The statement “the acceptance cri- “rules and regulations,” and the appen-
American Welding Society (AWS) D1 teria in AWS D1.1 remain driven by dices were considered as “additional ma-
committee. However, I think he made workmanship and detectability; are terial pertinent to the regulation of weld-
some misstatements in this article limited to scans at 45, 60, and 70 deg; ing.” However, the numbered clauses cited
that merit some commentary and cor- and have not incorporated modern specific appendices with a “shall be,”
rection. structural performance approaches,” making them normative using today’s
In his section on phased array ul- makes it sound like the 13 years of terminology.
trasonic testing (PAUT), “Use of PAUT tireless work of the Inspection Task The improvements to UT in the D1
(and Other Flaw-Sizing Methods) to Group was misdirected and didn’t codes I referenced relate to organization
its Full Potential,” paragraph one, he achieve its goals. and clarity in its application, not to im-
stated the following: “AWS D1.1 The original intent and scope of the provements in acceptance criteria, which
[Structural Welding Code — Steel] intro- inspection language in this code have has remained relatively unchanged for
duced ultrasonic testing to the struc- always been based on workmanship more than 50 years.
tural welding code in 1972 and it has and detectability. Structural perform- I commend the Inspection Task Group
undergone many improvements since ance approaches can be used if there for its work bringing PAUT into the
that time.” Ultrasonic testing (UT) was are a well developed technique and cri- Structural Welding Code. The specific,
actually introduced in the 1969 edi- teria established and the engineer ap- detailed instructions for PAUT have en-
tions of both AWS D1.0 and D2.0 Ap- proves. The code already allows for abled its use on several recent projects
pendix C in both the Building and this and more advanced nondestruc- where its enhanced flaw detection and
Bridge codes so identified at the time. tive testing [examination] techniques, sizing capabilities have enabled engineer-
He is only three years off, no big deal, subject to engineer approval. The In- ing-based decisions to accept, repair, re-
but to say it has undergone many im- spection Task Group’s charge here was place, or reinforce welded joints in critical
provements is debatable. That original to create code language for PAUT that applications. At the same time, it has ex-
indication rating technique is still in could be substituted one-for-one for posed some of the weaknesses and limita-
the code body language today and has the pulse-echo technique in the main tions of using codified UT techniques and
only undergone minor changes over body of the code. We knew we weren’t scan angles, so there is more work to be
the 50 years it has been in the code, using the full capabilities of PAUT and done, as always.
which is a testament of how well it was there was a lot of pushback from many The opportunity I referenced is not di-
developed in the beginning. directions not to. Initial laboratory rected to the Inspection Task Group, but
How do I know this? I was vice testing indicated that more welds rather to those who, as you state, provid-
chair and chair of the Inspection Task would be rejected with this technique ed “pushback from many directions” not
Group for 12 years from 2006–2018. I if we allowed these full capabilities. to use the full capabilities of PAUT. The
also have documentation from previ- This would have rendered the PAUT use of the flaw-sizing capabilities of
ous group leaders during that time language moot and unused in the fab- PAUT, as well as other enhanced UT tech-
that highlighted the few changes that rication community. We didn’t have niques, was first and foremost in our
were made over the years. I can make time or expertise to develop a fitness minds when we introduced flaw-size
these available if needed. for purpose or “modern structural per- based acceptance criteria for moment
In the second paragraph, he stated: formance approach” technique and cri- connection welds in AWS D1.8, Struc-
“Although PAUT has been used suc- teria that would be acceptable to the tural Welding Code — Seismic Supple-
cessfully since its inception, the ac- entire D1 committee that would have ment, first edition in 2005, and they re-
ceptance criteria in AWS D1.1 remain to approve it. main part of that standard today. We
driven by workmanship and de- Please give this due consideration know it can be and has been done.
tectability; are limited to scans at 45, in your deliberations for the next So the opportunity is there, but we
60, and 70 deg; and have not incorpo- actions. should also consider it a challenge to seize
rated modern structural performance this opportunity and use PAUT to its full
approaches.” Here are my issues. Al- Gary Martin potential to build safer and more econom-
though PAUT has been used success- Greenville, SC ical structures. That takes teamwork
fully since its inception, I’m not sure from many, and I hope that the welding
one can say PAUT was successful in its Thank you, Gary, for your thoughtful community, with researchers and design
inception when it took almost 20 years Letter to the Editor. I, too, consider us engineers, will assist in this effort.
to get it in the AWS code. In the begin- friends from our years of service together
ning, the equipment was very expen- on AWS D1 committees. — Bob Shaw
Six-Axis Robot Enables its 1200-mm reach and 10-kg payload. Fume Extractor Developed for
Collaborative Welding Meeting established safety standards Robotic Welding Applications
(TUV and ISO), it also provides power
and force-limiting (PFL) with dual-
channel torque sensors in all joints to
constantly monitor force and quickly
react. It can easily shift between the
collaborative speed in PFL mode or the
full speed in industrial mode to opti-
mize cycle times based on risk assess-
ment and process requirements. The
pinchless cobot can operate without
additional protective measures (de-
pending on risk assessment), such as a
safety fence, resulting in reduced cost
and space requirements. Additionally,
the cobot offers precision hand guid-
ing to facilitate easy programming and
fast implementation of the robot sys- The xFUME™ ROBO fume extractor
tem. The arm utilities hide cabling, fits onto robotic welding torches to
including a Category 6 Ethernet cable capture fumes at the welding arc. Pair-
The six-axis HC10XP human- that enables communications for a va- ing with a portable or centralized fume
collaborative robot (cobot) works with, riety of tooling options. Hiding cables extraction system, it is easier to imple-
or in close proximity to, human work- reduces the risk of snagging or inter- ment than hooded cells or central ven-
ers to add robotic welding capacities to ference with other equipment. tilation systems. Additionally, the
the current production. It supple- Yaskawa Motoman fume extractor utilizes a robust and
ments manual welding or rolling (in- motoman.com durable mounting bracket with a con-
cluding large, heavy workpieces) with (937) 847-3200 tinuously rotating bushing to mimic
the sixth axis movement of the robot. by a machine shop personnel in about How to Choose the Right One provides
This keeps the intake boot close to the a day. guidance on finding the appropriate
weld without compromising perform- robot for a given application from
ance. The high-vacuum fume extractor VersaBuilt Inc. both capability and cost standpoints.
also captures more than 95% of weld- versabuilt.com The ten-page white paper covers the
ing fumes to provide respiratory pro- (208) 906-0814 following topics: history of robotics;
tection and maintain a cleaner work- different types of robot technologies,
ing area within the robot cell. With including articulated, cartesian, selec-
various hose management options and tive compliance articulated robot arm,
a flexible suction boot design, the White Paper Aids Consumers delta, and collaborative robot; benefits
fume extractor integrates into current in Choosing the Right Robot and limitations of each technology;
operations without interfering with and factors to consider in selecting
robot flexibility or access. It works for Robots. There’s One for Every Job — the right robot for the job. The free
all widely used robot original equip-
ment manufacturers and fits onto the
company’s standard robotic welding
torches and necks.
ABICOR BINZEL®
binzel-abicor.com
(800) 542-4867
white paper can be accessed on the quickly and easily automate assembly
company’s website. processes, such as repetitive and uner-
gonomic manual screwdriving. Opera-
Festo Inc. tors can utilize the screwdriver by
festo.com entering the appropriate screw length
(800) 963-3786 and torque value into the user inter-
face that is integrated into the teach
pendant of any leading robot. With
precise torque control and embedded
Robotic Screwdriver Facilitates axis, the screwdriver automatically cal- once the robot arm moves into posi-
Repetitive Assembly Work culates the speed and force required tion, which reduces robot arm move-
for consistent, accurate screwdriving. ment and additional programming.
The intelligent, plug-and-play With its z-axis, screws are retracted in- Screws that are up to 35-mm long are
screwdriver allows manufacturers to side the tool and driven automatically retracted completely inside the screw-
driver when moving until the screw-
driving process is safely initiated, en-
hancing its collaborative capabilities.
The screwdriver can also detect incor-
rect screw length, which can help im-
prove overall quality and reduce scrap.
It handles screw sizes and lengths
from M1.6 to M6 and up to 50 mm
long. With its simple programming
and exchangeable bit system, the
screwdriver can be changed to a differ-
ent screw size, length, or product line
in minutes, thus minimizing down-
time and improving productivity.
OnRobot
onrobot.com
(469) 586-8384
offline programming software for cus- using gas tungsten arc welding and Robotic Torch Brake Keeps
tomers to program robot movements purge gas with various oxygen levels. Welding Wire Stationary
and optimize welding processes from Serving as a color reference, the pho-
their personal computer. There are tographs show a numbered sequence
three types of welding cells that can be of discolorations that engineers can
selected based on the design of the ro- select from and incorporate into their
tary positioners that pick up the com- contract documents. Additionally, the
ponents and swivel them into the standard provides guidance on select-
welding cell. All variants can be ing the appropriate levels of discol-
equipped with different robots. oration, including discoloration toler-
ance for some service conditions.
Fronius International GmbH While these weld discoloration photo-
fronius.com graphs are similar to those in Ameri-
+43 7242 241 0 can Welding Society D18.1, Specifica-
tion for Welding of Austenitic Stainless
Steel Tube and Pipe Systems in Sanitary The robotic torch wire brake locks
(Hygienic) Applications, and the Ameri- the welding wire in place during appli-
Standard Helps Engineers can Society of Mechanical Engineers cations that utilize wire touch sense,
Determine Acceptable Levels Bioprocessing Engineering Code, they such as wire touch sensing for joint de-
of Weld Discoloration were made using a common pickled tection. It works for welding wires up
pipe rather than polished tube. Al- to .062 in. (1.6 mm) in diameter. The
The ES-50, Internal Oxidation for though this standard refers to pipe, it wire brake is air activated and is deac-
Piping Welds, engineering standard is also applicable to welds made using tivated during the welding process.
provides a simple means for specifying tube. Additionally, it can be applied to
the acceptable level of discoloration of welds made using any welding process. American Weldquip
the root side of stainless steel pipe weldquip.com
welds. It achieves this through photo- Pipe Fabrication Institute® (330) 239-0317
graphs that illustrate root-side surface pfi-institute.org
oxidation of stainless steel welds made (514) 634-3434
W
elding automation is not a Getting Ahead with Offline ables a preanalysis of weldments; the
new concept, but the way it is Programming operator can examine which ones will
implemented is constantly be suitable for robotic welding.
evolving. Automation doesn’t elimi- Bottlenecking is a problem that is “The customer can have an addi-
nate the human element or intelli- often experienced in traditional pro- tional license not only for program-
gence — it just uses it in a different gramming. A bottleneck occurs when ming but for the production planning
way. For example, rather than having the capacity of an application or a phase,” Rusi noted. “They can import
the welder climb a scaffolding, balance computer system is limited or slows the piece as a 3D model in the soft-
themselves on a slippery surface, or down. According to Teemu Rusi, robot- ware and see whether the robot can
squeeze into a dangerously tight place ics manager at Pemamek Oy, Loimaa, reach difficult welds or how it should
to fill a groove, he or she can change Finland, the ability to program robotic be attached to the workpiece
the wire feed, heat range, wire diame- applications offline is ideal for low- positioner.”
ter, and much more via a computer volume, high-mix jobs because the The simulation enables collision-
screen while the robot does the physi- next welds are preprogrammed while free paths and an exact-time study al-
cal labor. the robot works on another piece si- ready in the preplanning phase.
This article aims to take the mys- multaneously — Fig. 1. This solves the Large parts and structures can take
tery out of automated welding and bottleneck problems where the opera- time to program and often have irreg-
provide examples of how the process tor needs to be next to the robot to ular groove welds due to the nature of
doesn’t have to be threatening to the control its motions with a teach pen- their geometry and size. Adaptive
welder workforce. dant. Offline programming also en- welding paths can be programmed
offline as well, allowing the software
to adapt those paths to fill grooves of
different depths and sizes. This is
especially suitable when working
with one-off or low-volume jobs in
succession.
“In the case of a ship bulkhead,
which has many intricate parts and
pieces, the first part can be pro-
grammed well before you ever get it to
the point where you can start to weld,”
said Michael Bell, national sales direc-
tor, Pemamek North America. “When
you start to weld the first part, the
second part or section can be pro-
grammed while the first is welding.
You can choose to what degree you
want to program the operation.”
Fig. 3 — The PEMA WeldControl’s offline copy and mirror functions allow operators to create one weld on a piece and copy or
mirror it to the opposite side of the weldment.
can program the robots to do the work.” products and then determine how big
Robots are especially beneficial for Automated welding the welding stations should be, how
back-bending work. Manual welding long the robot arm reach should be,
can be a physically demanding job with technologies take how much movement for the external
workpieces ranging from manageable advantage of the axis do we need, and what the capacity
sizes like those found in automotive welder’s practical should be of our workpiece welding
applications to those requiring scaf- experience and positioner. All of our robotic systems
folding and precarious positioning to knowledge honed over are modular and can be modified ac-
reach a welding area. At some point, cording to customer needs.”
the welder can be put in a precarious
years on the job and give
position that jeopardizes his or her the physically tough Welding of the Future
safety. Automated welding technolo- tasks to an entity that
gies take advantage of the welder’s can’t really get hurt. In the future, Rusi envisions an
practical experience and knowledge all-automated process, from program-
honed over years on the job and give ming to final weld, for seamless,
the physically tough tasks to an entity cles can result in big savings during collision-free movements, while Mäki-
that can’t really get hurt. the manufacturing process and in- talo looks to the integration of differ-
crease efficiency,” said Pemamek CEO ent types of software such as welding
Onshoring the Production Juha Mäkitalo. “Some of our cus- control programs with enterprise re-
Process tomers have realized more than 50% source planning systems so that every
reduction in cycle times by automating aspect of the manufacturing process is
Manufacturing in the era of the their welding operations. In time, you documented. One thing is for certain,
COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted can add another shift using only auto- if accuracy, efficient welding opera-
the weak links in the supply chain mated processes (think preprogram- tions, and the ability to have absolute
from country to country. There is ming) using the same number of peo- control over the manufacturing
much talk about onshoring manufac- ple on the job. I think there are a lot of process is a priority for your shop,
turing, not just in the U.S. but in other opportunities to increase efficiency.” you’ll be adopting automated welding
countries in Europe and beyond. In- Customization of equipment can technologies quite soon. WJ
vestment in automated technologies help speed along processes even more.
goes a long way toward keeping pro- “We always analyze customer pro-
duction in-house for many companies. duction and the products they are JAAKKO HEIKONEN
“It helps you to keep manufacturing planning to use for robotic welding,” (jaakko.heikonen@pemamek.com) is
close to home. Automating welding cy- Rusi said. “We check their portfolio of owner, Pemamek Oy, Loimaa, Finland.
MT Solar, a solar mounting equip- Demand Spikes and when you look at the time and re-
ment manufacturer based in Charlo, sources to get them up and running
Mont., designs and manufactures Labor Shortages Spur and programmed, it was not the route
mounting structures for solar modules Automation Adoption we wanted to take,” Jordan said.
of all sizes. A Vectis Automation Cobot He further noted the company pre-
Welding Tool, powered by Universal MT Solar experiences a 300% jump ferred a solution that wouldn’t require
Robots (UR), now handles a wide in demand for its solar mount prod- safety guarding and that existing oper-
range of MT Solar’s welds (see lead ucts every summer. However, the com- ators could handle.
photo). This move has not only en- pany had been unable to find skilled
abled quick changeovers but also opti- welders workers to handle the season-
mized production. al uptick at its rural manufacturing
Collaborative Robot
To discover even more key details, plant. Takes Center Stage
including how the company conquered Inspired by the welder’s suggestion,
labor shortages and freed current staff Jordan researched conventional weld- The paradigm changed when UR
from repetitive welding tasks, while ing robots, but found them inflexible was found. This provider of robot
successfully handling a 300% surge in and best suited to huge batches of the arms and cobots is headquartered in
demand, continue reading this case same item. Finding a flexible automa- Denmark, with other offices located
study. tion solution was crucial because the worldwide.
company makes many different types “The big difference is the ‘collabora-
of mounting parts, often in high tive robot approach’ of being able to
Unveiling the Unit mix/low volume batches. work with the robot, and it being so
Jordan explained the following: teachable and so easy to run,” Jordan
On the morning MT Solar’s new, “We have many products that go to- said.
do-it-yourself (DIY) Cobot Welding gether — think of us as a ‘Solar IKEA,’ While traditional welding robots re-
Tool arrived at the company’s Charlo if you will — where all the pieces have quire safety cages, cobots offer safe
facility in rural Montana, anticipation to be assembled in the field. If I don’t human-robot collaboration in close
had been building for some time. have all the other parts that go with it, proximity without fences, Jordan not-
“It made for a very interesting first I can’t ship anything.” ed. This helped to increase the appeal
few moments with the robot,” said The cost of conventional automa- of cobot-powered welding solutions.
Travis Jordan, owner and president, MT tion is compounded by the stress asso- “When I zoomed in and discovered
Solar. “The robot shows up on the ciated with programming and setup, Vectis Automation’s Cobot Welding
truck, and of course, I’m all excited he added. Tool, it became obvious that this com-
about it. I walk out of the office, and I’ve “At first, it might look like a good bination was the right way to go,” Jor-
got employees already cutting shrink idea to use traditional robots, but dan said. “You can work right beside
wrap off the robot and getting ready to
set something up. I was like, ‘Hang on! I
want to play!’ We had production parts
running that same afternoon.”
Those first production parts were
the culmination of a process that had
begun some months prior, as the com-
pany was scrambling to deal with sea-
sonal labor shortages. Then one day, a
welder handed Jordan a news article
on welding robots.
“He said, ‘I really think you should
look into this. It would be a good solu-
tion for our team,’” Jordan recalled.
“And I’m like, ‘Well, if you got one of
the operators saying you need to look
into robotics, you’ve got a reason you
should be doing something here.’”
His hiring woes reflect a national
trend. The American Welding Society
predicts a potential shortfall of Fig. 1 — “You can work right beside the cobot as it is moving and welding,” said Travis
400,000 welders by 2025. Jordan, owner and president, MT Solar.
GMAW in 38 Min
Takt Time
Implementing the tool was based on
extensive human-robot collaboration.
Operators set up the cell with jigs,
Fig. 2 — “There’s been a stigma that cobots can’t go into heavy industrial environments, but
supply the parts, and program the sys-
what our customers are saying and seeing is that that’s not true,” said Josh Pawley (left),
cofounder of Vectis Automation. tem through an intuitive 3D interface
directly integrated on the cobot’s teach
pendant through Vectis’ URCap soft-
ware plugin. The pendant includes a
complete weld library developed by
Vectis, providing standard settings for
common weld jobs, including pattern
and tack tools — Fig. 3.
“I am by no means a certified
welder,” Jordan said. “I’ll just grab any
of the guys out of the shop who are
welders, and I’ll say, ‘Okay, I’ll run the
pendant. You go ahead and run the
torch and put it where you want it.
Where do you want the weld to start?
Where do you want it to stop? What
angle do you want it to do?’ And we’ve
thought through some very advanced
welds.”
DIY programming complete, the ro-
bot autonomously runs a full gas met-
al arc welding (GMAW) cycle. The
UR10e collaborative industrial robot
welds six to eight parts in each cycle.
Typically, these are small parts, includ-
ing lock collars, beam clamps, and
weld nuts. The cobot welds these in a
predefined order and completes 4–12
parts per run with no batching.
Fig. 3 — The Vectis Cobot Welding Tool is a ready-to-weld, UR+ certified application kit When welding tasks have been
powered by Universal Robots’ UR10e. It comes with an intuitive interface directly integrated completed, operators can reload parts
to the cobot’s teach pendant (pictured) that allows end users with no robotics experience to and restart the system, if required, or
program the system. quickly program a new welding job
with fresh parts. The cobot is respon-
the cobot as it is moving and welding. some skepticism around cobots and sible for welding specific lists of parts
My guys can have their hood down welding. every 38-min takt time shift. This
and be right there, changing parts out “There’s been a stigma that cobots manufacturing term describes the re-
with no safety guarding and no con- can’t go into heavy industrial environ- quired product assembly duration
cerns about safety. They’ve been very, ments, but what our customers are needed to match the demand (Ref. 1).
very comfortable working with it.” See saying and seeing is that that’s not Operators work collaboratively with
Fig. 1 as a reference. true,” he said — Fig. 2. “They are weld- the cobot, loading and unloading dur-
Josh Pawley, cofounder of Vectis ing thin-gauge materials, all the way ing cycles, maximizing the 51-in. reach
Automation, Loveland, Colo., men- down to 16 gauge, all the way up to of the UR10e cobot arm to cover mul-
tioned his business initially faced half-inch and thicker materials. tiple different fixtures.
Fig. 5 — The system has become a recruitment tool, according to Fig. 6 — “We plan to run six cobots eventually,” Jordan said. They
Jordan. Notice the welds it makes, which can be seen here. will help out in various ways, including new tasks.
and introduce a lot of variance, noted bility with the innovation and the nipulation of heavy and larger parts,
Gillin, especially when it comes to mo- nimbleness of a small company, which which will also alleviate some of the lift-
notonous work as well as relying on we think is an extremely powerful ing performed by employees — Fig. 6.
the calibrated thumb. combination.” “Having a system that’s easy to pro-
“We’ve built up to 7500 small parts gram, very flexible, and doesn’t have to
over a winter. For an operator to sit and Appealing to the Next have guarding and safety restrictions
do that, you can tell where they’ve got- around it is tantamount to being able
ten sick of it, and some of those parts Generation to replace, add to, and work together
end up being scrapped,” Gillin said. with employees,” Jordan concluded. WJ
The cobot currently performs that The cobot stands out to adolescents
as well — Fig. 5.
repetitive work. Reference
Additionally, for Jordan, the system “Attracting younger quality talent is
offers repeatability manufacturers a challenge in rural environments,”
1. Wikipedia. 2020. Takt time.
crave and helps the company maintain Jordan said. “So, it’s really important en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Takt_time
consistent product quality. to have things to bring to the table as
“Furthermore, the consistency and an employer, and we find that there’s a
flexibility of the system enables MT real sparkle in people’s eyes when we
tell them we have a robot on the crew.” JOE CAMPBELL (joca@universal-robots.com) is
Solar to compete with large corpora- senior manager of applications development,
tions,” Jordan said. “Having a robot Universal Robots USA, Ann Arbor, Mich. JOSH
that can quickly be transitioned to dif- What’s Next? PAWLEY (josh.pawley@vectisautomation.com)
ferent jobs and different tasks is para- is director of business development and
founding partner, Vectis Automation, Loveland,
mount to our success. It allows us to MT Solar plans to acquire more Colo.
combine industrial quality and scala- cobots soon for new tasks, such as ma-
Understanding Fixed
Automation Welding
BY UGO OKWUAGWU
W
hen it comes to automating it desirable from a labor perspective —
the welding process, many particularly given the shortage of
companies opt for robotic skilled welders the industry is facing.
welding systems due to the flexibility A fixed automation welding cell can
they provide and their ability to reach be set up in two ways. The first option
and weld multiple joints. These sys- requires tooling that holds the part in
tems offer the advantages of speed place, while a fixed automatic welding
and accuracy and can be repro- gun moves along the weld joint by way
grammed to manage new projects. of a mechanized seam welding ma-
But these robotic systems aren’t chine or a track and carriage that holds
right for every application. In indus- the gun in place. This option would
tries such as oil and gas, railcar, struc- be viable for a long structural beam,
tural steel fabrication, and shipbuild- for example.
ing, joint configurations are often less In the second scenario, the welding
complex, consisting of a single part to gun may be fixed in a single place by
be welded as opposed to full assem- tooling while the part, such as a pipe,
blies. In this case, fixed automation rotates on a lathe or circumferential
welding is generally preferred. fixture during the welding process. In
today’s marketplace, there is equip-
About Fixed Automation ment that can rotate parts that have a
wide range of diameters and weights.
Welding Tooling for fixed automation weld-
ing offers minimal flexibility and can
Fixed automation welding, some- be expensive to adjust for new parts.
times called hard automation welding, This is true particularly in comparison
is commonly used for joining pipes, to a robotic welding system that can be
structural beams, tanks, and vessels in reprogrammed to articulate and weld
a shop environment prior to them be- in different positions along the X, Y,
ing moved to the jobsite where they and Z axes.
will be placed into service — Fig. 1. It When investing in the tooling for
can also be used for welding steel fixed automation welding, it’s impor-
plates for the general fabrication in- tant for companies to determine up-
dustry or in the manufacturing of hot front what their long-term applica-
water heaters and propane tanks. tions will be. Will they continue to
One common factor in these appli- weld parts that are straight or circular
cations is the need for either longitudi- for the foreseeable future?
nal or circular (inside or outside diam-
eter) welds that require repeatability
as opposed to versatility. Other factors Avoiding Pitfalls
that make applications suitable for in the Process
fixed automation welding include the
following: One very important part of the
• A high volume of similar parts fixed automation welding system is the
with low variety, welding gun. It is not uncommon for
• Large parts with very long welds companies to take a do-it-yourself
or several similar welds, and (DIY) approach to this piece of equip-
• Large parts that would be difficult ment, fixturing a semiautomatic gun in
to weld manually. place with various components to
In some cases, fixed automation mimic the performance of a fixed auto-
welding can help companies meet high matic gun. Sometimes this is done out
production goals at a relatively low of convenience, due to the shop having
cost. It is also easy for a single opera- an abundance of semiautomatic guns
tor to oversee and load parts, making or because of a perceived cost savings.
It is important to invest
in a fixed automatic
welding gun that is
designed for the
process. These guns
have consistent
components that can
be sourced from
manufacturers so that
the welds are
repeatable.
W
elding robots were first intro- many manufacturers are still reluctant the user’s job. This mindset can make
duced to automotive produc- to adopt these machines into their even simple programming tasks seem
tion lines in the 1980s and welding processes. One of the biggest daunting.
quickly grew to support a wide range reasons for this is the misconception The reality is that many smaller
of industries and applications in the that robots are too difficult to pro- shops are turning away jobs because
coming years. gram and run. they cannot keep up with demand.
While originally designed and used With the growing shortage of available
for spot welding on large original Dispelling the Myths welders, these robots should be seen
equipment manufacturer (OEM) as- as a supplement rather than a replace-
sembly lines, a number of significant Part of the myth that surrounds ment to experienced professionals.
technological advancements made programming welding robots is not It’s also important to remember
these robots easier to use and enabled unlike that which every other newer that some welders who have used a
small- and mid-sized manufacturers to technology faces. Most of us can re- particular robot have found it difficult
adopt them into their arc welding member being intimidated by all the to switch over to another brand. This
processes — Fig. 1. features offered by our smart phone, perceived difficulty is, more often than
Yet, despite the many obvious ben- but now we don’t think twice about not, because they are not used to the
efits that welding robots provide, like them. This technology is no different. nuances of the new system.
increased production, better quality, Some of the reluctance is also creat- Thanks to improvements in user in-
and safer conditions for workers, ed by the fear that the robot will take terfaces and other technology, most
welding robots have never been easier
to program and use. With our growing
number of daily electronic interac-
tions, from iPhones to video games,
we have never been more prepared to
program robots.
The Technologies
Teach Pendants
Software
Simulation
CHARLES ADAMS (charles.adams@kuka.com) is a welding sales application engineer, KUKA Robotics, Shelby Township, Mich.
CERTIFICATION SCHEDULE
CERTIFICATION SEMINARS, CODE CLINICS, AND EXAMINATIONS
Note: The 2020 schedules for all certifications are posted online at Certified Resistance Welding Technician
awo.aws.org/instructor-led-seminars/seminar-exam-schedule. (CRWT)
A comprehensive two-day seminar to arm attendees with
Certified Welding Inspector (CWI) the knowledge needed to take the exam with confidence.
Seminar covers Parts A, B, and C of the CWI exam. Only Part B More information at awo.aws.org/crwt.
of the exam is taken following the conclusion of the seminar. Location Seminar Dates
Parts A and C are given at Prometric testing centers. Nashville, TN Oct. 27–28
Location Seminar Dates Part B
Exam Date
Orlando, FL Nov. 1–6 Nov. 7
Indianapolis, IN Nov. 1–6 Nov. 7 Certified Welding Supervisor (CWS)
Reno, NV Nov. 1–6 Nov. 7 CWS exams are given at Prometric testing centers. More infor-
Dallas, TX Nov. 1–6 Nov. 7 mation at aws.org/certification/detail/certified-welding-supervisor.
Sacramento, CA Nov. 8–13 Nov. 14
Syracuse, NY Nov. 8–13 Nov. 14
Cleveland, OH Nov. 8–13 Nov. 14
Waco, TX Nov. 15–20 Nov. 21
Norfolk, VA Nov. 15–20 Nov. 21
San Diego, CA Dec. 6–11 Dec. 12 Certified Radiographic Interpreter (CRI)
Miami, FL Dec. 6–11 Dec. 12 The CRI certification can be a stand-alone credential or
St. Louis, MO Dec. 6–11 Dec. 12 can exempt you from your next 9-Year Recertification. More
information at aws.org/certification/detail/certified-
radiographic-interpreter.
WELDING WORKBOOK
DATASHEET 400
Advantages
Because of its versatility, GMAW has become more widely
used and has replaced shielded metal arc welding (SMAW) for
many applications. This increased usage of GMAW can be at- Fig. 2 — Pictured is a typical robotic GMAW installation.
tributed to its many advantages, the most important of which
include the following:
1. It is an efficient consumable-electrode process that can Disadvantages
be used to weld all commercial metals and alloys;
2. It overcomes the restriction of limited electrode length As with any welding process, certain limitations restrict the
encountered with SMAW; use of GMAW. The welding equipment required for GMAW is
3. Welding can be performed in all positions, a capability more complex, more costly, and less portable than that for
submerged arc welding does not have; SMAW, for example. GMAW is also difficult to use in hard-to-
4. Deposition rates are significantly higher than those reach places because the welding gun is larger than a SMAW
obtained with SMAW; electrode holder, and the welding gun must be close to the
5. Welding speeds are higher than those attained with joint (i.e., between 10 and 19 mm [38⁄ and 34⁄ in.] to ensure the
SMAW because of the continuous electrode feed and higher weld metal is properly shielded. Additionally, the welding arc
filler metal deposition rates; must be protected against air drafts in excess of 5 mph, which
6. Long welds can be deposited without intermediate stops may disperse the shielding gas. This limits outdoor applica-
and starts because the electrode (wire feed) is continuous; tions unless protective shields are placed around the welding
7. When spray transfer is used, a deeper penetration is pos- area. Another limitation of GMAW involves the relatively high
sible with GMAW than with SMAW, often permitting the use levels of radiated heat and arc intensity, which can contribute
of smaller-sized fillet welds for equivalent joint strengths; to an operator’s resistance to accept the process. WJ
Excerpted from the Welding Handbook, Ninth Edition, Volume 2, Welding Processes, Part 1.
The members of the American indicated with the proposed amend- Treasurer, and Article IX Section 2
Welding Society will consider any ment in red boldface. — National Nominating Committee
amendments to the Society’s Bylaws at shall not be considered as the board
the Annual Meeting, to be held virtu- service, and calendar year 2020
ally on Monday, November 16. Article IX. Nomination and shall be extended by 12 months to
These Amendments were approved Election of National Officers end on December 31, 2021. In addi-
by the Board of Directors on August and Directors tion, any other Bylaw provision that
11 and are recommended for adoption could prevent, or would be contrary
by the members. The amendment will Section 8. Date to Assume Office to, this 12-month extension of
expire on December 31, 2021, and the terms is hereby suspended.
original language to the Bylaws will For the purposes of terms of
supersede. service, nominations and elections The terms of all officers and Direc-
The Bylaws require that the text of for members of the Board of Direc- tors shall begin on January 1. Officers
any amendment be published in the tors and Committees as defined in and Directors shall continue in their
Welding Journal and mailed at least 30 these Bylaws Article V Section 3 — respective offices or positions until
days before the members take action. Directors-at-Large, Article V Sec- their successors have been elected and
Members are encouraged to vote on tion 4 — District Directors, Article V qualified. Officers’ and Directors’
the proposed amendment at the afore- Section 5 — Past Presidents, Arti- terms of office may be extended/de-
mentioned virtual meeting or through cle VIII Section 2 — President, Arti- creased by the Board of Directors to
the exercise of the proxy published on cle VIII Section 3 — Vice Presi- accommodate any change in the Soci-
the next page. The present wording is dents, Article VIII Section 4 — ety’s fiscal year.
The Nominations Sought for Na- 2022 National Offices. Those individu- serve in 2021, and the National Nomi-
tional Offices notification was previ- als who were to take office and join the nating Committee will convene at a
ously posted in the July and August Board in 2021 will start on January 1, date to be determined between Janu-
Welding Journal. As stated on this 2022. AWS members who wish to ary and April of 2021 to allow ample
page, the American Welding Society nominate candidates for 2023 Presi- time for AWS members to nominate
(AWS) Board of Directors has amend- dent, Vice President, Treasurer, and candidates for President, Vice Presi-
ed the Bylaws to allow the 2020 Board Director-at-Large may do so by July dent, Treasurer, and Director-at-Large
to extend their current terms of serv- 31, 2021, for the National Nominating on the AWS Board of Directors for the
ice for 12 months into 2021. This Committee Meeting to take place dur- term starting January 1, 2022. An ap-
amendment is subject to AWS Mem- ing the September 2021 FABTECH propriate posting with nomination re-
bership approval during the 2020 An- Show in Chicago, Ill. quirements will be provided in the
nual Meeting. If the amendment is ap- In the event that the Bylaw amend- Welding Journal and on the AWS web-
proved by Membership, the 2020 Na- ment is not approved during the 2020 site if the proposed amendment is not
tional Nominating Committee will not Annual Meeting of Members, the orig- approved and the National Nominat-
hold nominations in 2020 for the inally nominated 2021 Board will ing Committee is to convene.
SOCIETY NEWS
TECH TOPICS
New Standards Projects for the Design, Manufacture, and Exami- approved by ANSI, require that all
nation of Critical Brazed Components. standards be open to public review for
Development work has begun on This standard lists the necessary steps comment during the approval process.
the following new or revised stan- to assure the suitability of brazed com- This column also advises of ANSI ap-
dards. Affected individuals are invited ponents for critical applications. Al- proval of documents.
to contribute to their development. though such applications vary widely, A5.10/A5.10M:20XX (ISO 18273:
Participation in AWS technical com- they have certain common considera- 2015 MOD), Specification for Bare Alu-
mittees is open to all persons. tions with respect to materials, design, minum and Aluminum-Alloy Welding
A5.8M/A5.8:20XX, Specification for manufacture, and inspection. It is the Electrodes and Rods. Revised Standard.
Filler Metals for Brazing and Braze Weld- intent of this document to identify and $36.00. ANSI public review expires
ing. This specification prescribes the explain these common considerations 10/5/2020. Contact: G. Gupta, ext. 301,
requirements for the classification of and the best techniques for dealing with gupta@aws.org.
brazing filler metals for brazing and them. It is beyond the scope of this D8.1M:20XX, Specification for Auto-
braze welding. The chemical composi- document to provide specific details motive Weld Quality Resistance Spot
tion, physical form, and packaging of on these techniques, which the user Welding of Steel. Revised Standard.
more than 120 brazing filler metals must adapt to fit each particular appli- $25.00. ANSI public review expired
are specified. The brazing filler metal cation. Stakeholders: brazing engineers, 9/14/2020. Contact: M. Diaz, ext. 310,
groups described include aluminum, educators, and general interest groups. mdiaz@aws.org.
cobalt, copper, gold, magnesium, nick- Revised Standard. Contact: K. Bulger, D8.9M:20XX, Test Methods for Eval-
el, palladium, silver, titanium, and kbulger@aws.org, ext. 306. uating the Resistance Spot Welding Be-
brazing filler metals for vacuum service. C3.15M/C3.15:20XX, Standard havior of Automotive Sheet Steel Materi-
Information is also provided concern- Method for Evaluating the Strength of als. Revised Standard. $40.00. ANSI
ing the liquidus, solidus, brazing tem- Solder Joints. This document establish- public review expired 9/7/2020. Con-
perature range, and general areas of es common methodologies for testing tact: M. Diaz, mdiaz@aws.org, ext. 310.
application recommended for each the strength of structural solder joints
brazing filler metal. Additional re- and the interpretation of strength
quirements are included for manufac- data. The document addresses the fol-
ture, sizes, lengths, and packaging. A lowing: test sample configurations, Opportunities to Contribute to
guide is appended to the specification sample fabrication, test methods, and AWS Technical Committees
as a source of information concerning data interpretation. Stakeholders:
the classification system employed Those involved with structural solder- The following committees welcome
and the intended use of the brazing ing applications as well as those in the new members. Some committees are
filler metals for brazing and braze electronics industry. New Standard. recruiting members with specific
welding. Stakeholders: brazers, manu- Contact: K. Bulger, kbulger@aws.org, interests in regard to the committee’s
facturers, and consumers. Revised ext. 306. scope, as marked below: Producers (P),
Standard. Contact: K. Bulger, ext. 306, D3.9/D3.9M:20XX, Specification for General Interest (G), Educators (E),
kbulger@aws.org. the Classification of Weld-Through Paint Consultants (C), and Users (U). For more
C3.2M/C3.2:20XX, Standard Method Primers. This specification prescribes information, contact the staff member
for Evaluating the Strength of Brazed the requirements for the classification listed or visit aws.org/library/ doclib/
Joints. This standard describes the test of weld-through paint primers. The Technical-Committee-Application.pdf.
methods used to obtain brazed strength classification is based on paint film S. Borrero, sborrero@aws.org, ext.
data of the short-time testing of single- thickness and welding procedure. 334. Definitions and symbols, A2
lap joints in shear, butt-tension, stress- Manufacturers may classify their prod- Committee (E). Titanium and zirco-
rupture, creep-strength, four-point- ucts to different film thicknesses or nium filler metals, A5K Subcommit-
bending, and ceramic-tensile-button welding procedures if they provide tee. Piping and tubing, D10 Com-
specimens. It details specimen prepa- their test details. Stakeholders: marine mittee (C, E, U). Welding practices
ration methods, brazing procedures, construction community. Revised and procedures for austenitic
testing techniques, and methods for Standard. Contact: K. Bulger, ext. 306, steels, D10C Subcommittee. Alu-
data analysis. Sample forms for kbulger@aws.org. minum piping, D10H Subcommittee.
recording data are also presented. A Chromium molybdenum steel pip-
graphical method of data presentation ing, D10I Subcommittee. Welding of
relates shear stress to overlap dis- Standards for Public Review titanium piping, D10K Subcommit-
tance. Stakeholders: brazing engi- tee. Purging and root pass welding,
neers, educators, and general interest AWS was approved as an accredited D10S Subcommittee. Low-carbon
groups. Revised Standard. Contact: K. standards-preparing organization by steel pipe, D10T Subcommittee. Or-
Bulger, kbulger@aws.org, ext. 306. the American National Standards In- bital pipe welding, D10U Subcom-
C3.3:20XX, Recommended Practices stitute (ANSI) in 1979. AWS rules, as mittee. Duplex pipe welding, D10Y
SOCIETY NEWS
Subcommittee. Joining metals and B1 Committee (C, E). Brazing and S. Hedrick, steveh@aws.org, ext. 305.
alloys, G2 Committee (E, G, U). Reac- soldering, C3 Committee (C, E, G). Metric practice, A1 Committee (C, E).
tive alloys, G2D Subcommittee (G). Welding in marine construction, Mechanical testing of welds, B4 Com-
R. Gupta, gupta@aws.org, ext. 301. D3 Committee (C, E, G, U). High en- mittee (E, G, P). Joining of plastics
Filler metals and allied materials, ergy beam welding and cutting, C7 and composites, G1 Committee (C, E,
A5 Committee (E). Magnesium alloy Committee (C, E, G). Hybrid weld- G). Safety and health, SHC Commit-
filler metals, A5L Subcommittee. ing, C7D Subcommittee (G). Welding tee (E, G). Welding in sanitary appli-
P. Portela, pportela@aws.org, ext. of machinery and equipment, D14 cations, D18 Committee.
311. Additive manufacturing, D20 Committee (C, E, G, U). J. Rosario, jrosario@aws.org, ext.
Committee (C, E, G). Titanium M. Diaz, mdiaz@aws.org, ext. 310. 308. Procedure and performance
structural welding, D1N Subcom- Resistance welding, C1 Committee qualification, B2 Committee (E, G).
mittee (C, E, G, P, U). (C, E, G, U). Friction welding, C6 Thermal spraying, C2 Committee (C,
J. Molin, jmolin@aws.org, ext. 304. Committee (C, E). Automotive E, G, U). Oxyfuel gas welding and
Structural welding, D1 Committee welding, D8 Committee (C, E, G, U). cutting, C4 Committee (C, E, G).
(E). Sheet metal welding, D9 Com- Resistance welding equipment, J1 Welding iron castings, D11 (C, E, G,
mittee (C, G, P). Committee (C, E, G, U). Welding in P, U). Railroad welding, D15 (C, E, G,
K. Bulger, kbulger@aws.org, ext. the aircraft and aerospace indus- U). Robotic and automatic welding,
306. Methods of weld inspection, try, D17 Subcommittee (C, E, G). D16 Committee (C, E).
MEMBERSHIP ACTIVITIES
SOCIETY NEWS
Jüergen Egly Nondestructive Testing Sapigao Construction Inc. District and Section Awards
Services 94-1007 Puia St.
Siemensstrasse 33 Waipahu, HI 96797 District No. — Awardee — Section
Frankenthal, Rheinland Pfalz
Germany 67227 Transportation Technology Center
Inc.
Section Meritorious Award
Muscle Shoals Career Academy 55500 DOT Rd.
1 Phillip C. Witteman, Green and
321 Jim Holland Dr. Pueblo, CO 81001
White Mountain
Muscle Shoals, AL 35661
2 Alex Duschere, Long Island
Twin City Hose Inc.
2 Steve Dagnall, New Jersey
Northeast Mississippi Community 20615 Commerce Blvd.
2 Frank Simone, Philadelphia
College Rogers, MN 55374
2 Frank Srogota, Philadelphia
101 Cunningham Blvd.
2 Kyle Hardy, Philadelphia
Booneville, MS 38829 Zealous Welding and Fabrication
2 Vincent Murray, New Jersey
LLC
3 Dino Forst, Lehigh Valley
Pro-Weld Services LLC 74252 Lovern Rd.
3 Dave Hibshman, Reading
667 Melville Brown Rd. Pearl River, LA 70452
4 James Bowen, Triangle
Williamson, GA 30292
4 Christopher G. Gitthens, Triangle
4 David Shinault, SW Virginia
Texas House of Welds Welding 2020 Membership 4 Edward Campbell, SW Virginia
Academy
1720 Preston Ave., Ste. L Challenge 4 Kristie Miller, Tidewater
5 Robert A. Trudelle, Atlanta
Pasadena, TX 77503
Listed here are the members who 6 Brandilyn Gage, Rochester
participated in the 2020 Membership 7 Randy Coates, Cincinnati
Challenge — point standings as of 7 Jason J. Sherman, Pittsburgh
Affiliate Corporate Members 7 Michael B. Finney, Dayton
Aug. 18. The campaign runs from Jan.
1 to Dec. 31, 2020. Members receive 5 7 Uwe W. Aschemeier, Cincinnati
Adams Steel Erecting Consultant 7 Bryan H. Lyons, Columbus
points for each Individual Member
LLC 7 George Bodnar, Tri-State
and 1 point for every Student Member
10810 Charmwood Dr. 8 Curtis Duncan, Nashville
they recruit.
Riverview, FL 33569 8 Gerald Austin, Nashville
For more information, please see
page 57 of this Welding Journal or call 8 Bob O’Neal, Nashville
Alpha Industrial Construction LLC 8 Scott Bradley, Nashville
the AWS Membership Dept. at (800)
3310 NW Loop 338 9 Marcie Jacquet, Acadiana
443-9353, ext. 480.
Odessa, TX 79764 9 Travis G. Moore, New Orleans
J. W. Fregia, Houston — 95
A. D. Dillon, Detroit — 38 9 Donald J. Berger, New Orleans
Coast Metal Works Inc. 9 Chris Pawlowicz, Mobile
S. A. Milner, San Francisco — 36
2710 Woodland Dr. 10 Harry Sadler, Cleveland
B. J. Cain, Los Angeles/Inland
Coos Bay, OR 97420 10 Robert Fugate, Drake Well
Empire — 34
J. P. Theberge, Boston — 31 10 Dakota J. Urey, Drake Well
Conner Industries 10 Erick D. Speer, NW Pennsylvania
A. D. Stute, Madison-Beloit — 30
118 Bunton St. 13 Mike Merriman, Illinois Valley
Borger, TX 79007 J. C. Durbin, Tri-River — 30
D. L. Galiher, Detroit — 29 13 Dave Rodden, Blackhawk
T. A. Uff, Lehigh Valley — 29 13 Bruce Brummel, J.A.K.
Ensayos No Destructivos y 14 Tom Medina, St. Louis
Contratista Ltda. D. P. Thompson, SW Virginia —29
A. P. Duris, NW Ohio — 26 14 Rebecca McDonald, St. Louis
Edificio Terra, Depto. 73 14 Gabriella Bettegnies, Indiana
Antofagasta 1138002 Chile R. Young, Iowa — 24
T. Edwards, Tulsa — 20 14 Kelsey Eaton, Tri-River
H. J. Merrill II, Louisville — 20 14 John F. Helfrich, Tri-River
Environmental Air Systems LLC 14 Philip L. Young, Tri-River
250 Swathmore Ave. W. H. Wilson, New Orleans — 17
B. A. Cheatham, Columbia — 17 14 Rusty Shelden, Tri-River
High Point, NC 27263 14 Colten Conroy, Tri-River
O. Ortiz, Los Angeles/Inland
Empire — 16 14 Rick Richardson, Tri-River
Maxsteel Fabrication LLC 14 Electronics Research Inc., Tri-River
1240 Hwy. 70 Bypass G. J. Smith, Lehigh Valley — 15
C. W. Gilbertson, Northern Plains — 14 14 Southern Indiana Career and
Camden, TN 38320 Technical Center, Tri-River
C. Consentino, Pittsburgh — 13
V. O. Harthun, Northern Plains — 13 14 Coy A. Hall, Lexington
Quantum North America 14 Robert W. Mitchell, Lexington
T. A. Harris, Johnstown-Altoona — 13
5001 Rondo Dr., Ste. 100 14 Karl Watson, Louisville
S. Silverstein, Milwaukee — 12
Fort Worth, TX 76106 14 Gary Marx, Tri-River
M. D. Stein, Detroit — 11
SOCIETY NEWS
14 Bud Merrill, Louisville Section Educator Award 22 Aleda M. Vaughn, Sacramento Valley
14 Robert Lee, St. Louis 22 James D. Stucker, San Francisco
14 Travis Jumper, St. Louis 1 Mark A. Legel, Maine 22 Dave C. Vetrano, San Francisco
15 Bob G. Renner, Northwest 3 Leroy H. Begay, York-Lancaster 22 William Johnson, San Francisco
16 Michell R. Joynt, Nebraska 3 Dale J. Roberts, Reading
16 Sam Newhouse, Kansas City 4 Charles Bell, Triangle
17 Jeremy Cooper, Tulsa 4 David C. Myers, Triangle District Educator Award
18 Sri Krishna Chimbli, Houston 4 Doug P. Thompson, SW Virginia
18 Daniel Davenport, Houston 5 Carrie L. Pazolt, Atlanta 1 James R. Kein, Maine
18 J. W. Fregia, Houston 7 Tim Moore, Columbus 1 Fay Butler, Boston
18 Cindy Lindsay, Houston 7 Russ Shurtz, Dayton 3 Jamie Kotarski, Central Pennsylvania
18 Ernest G. Peltier, Houston 8 Jeff Cheek, Holston Valley 3 Daniel Millan, Reading
18 Alfredo Pena, Houston 9 Derrick O. Lett, Mobile 4 Charlie Chockley, SW Virginia
18 Edward Peterson, Houston 9 Paul Richardson, Mobile 4 Steve Gore, Charlotte
18 Terry Wells, Houston 9 Michael P. Stuchlik, Central Louisiana 7 Tim Moore, Columbus
18 Scott Witkowski, Houston 9 William H. Wilson, New Orleans 7 Russ Shurtz, Dayton
20 Matthew Q. Johnson, New Mexico 10 Mark Cyphert, NW Pennsylvania 8 Brian Keeton, Greater Huntsville
20 Timothy M. Donovan, New Mexico 10 Michael J. Swansiger, Stark Central 8 Jon Cookson, Holston Valley
20 Rodney Stubblefield, New Mexico 10 Julio J. Martinez, Cleveland 9 Paul Richardson, Mobile
20 James Berry, New Mexico 10 Travis Crate, Drake Well 10 Travis Crate, Drake Well
20 Estevan Ortega, New Mexico 12 John T. Roach, Madison-Beloit 11 Mark Stein, Detroit
20 Erik Pfeif, Colorado 13 Tony Sondgeroth, Illinois Valley 11 Charles Hunt, Northern Michigan
20 William Norton, Colorado 13 Jason Smith, Chicago 12 Kyle Worzala, Racine-Kenosha
20 Clay Christensen, Utah 13 Mike Merriman, Illinois Valley 13 Anthony L. Sondgeroth, Illinois
20 Woody Cook, Utah 14 Robert Lee, St. Louis Valley
20 Larry Zirker, Utah 14 Karl Watson, Lexington 13 Tim Bias, Illinois Valley
22 Jack E. Golub, Sacramento Valley 14 Coy Hall, Lexington 14 Dave McCoy, Tri-River
14 Bob Richwine, Indiana 14 Joe Candela, St. Louis
14 Charles D. House, Indiana 15 Jeremy Hall, Northwest
District Meritorious Award 14 Eric R. Cooper, Indiana 16 Christian R. Beaty, Nebraska
14 John C. Durbin, Tri-River 16 Jeffrey W. Jones, Kansas City
2 George Sheehan, New Jersey 14 Gilbert Morales, Tri-River 17 Rodney Riggs, Tulsa
2 Steve Catherman, Philadelphia 14 Rusty Shelden, Tri-River 18 James Tolar, Houston
3 Francis Butkus, Reading 14 Kevin R. Carter, Tri-River 18 Margaret Noble, Sabine
3 Jerry Jacobson, Reading 14 Christopher S. Rose, Tri-River 20 Trenton Moore, New Mexico
4 Wayne Smith, Tidewater 15 Ross Skattum, Northwest 20 Hunter Reynolds, Utah
4 Gary Cleveland, Triangle 15 Jason Eastling, Northwest 21 Ashley Wolters, San Diego
6 Paul Swatland, Niagara Frontier 15 David Otto, Northwest 22 Dale R. Phillips, San Francisco
7 Randy Dull, Columbus 16 Christian R. Beaty, Nebraska
7 Jim Sekely, Pittsburgh 16 Jeffrey W. Jones, Kansas City
8 Richard Mitchell, Greater Huntsville 16 Eric W. Vannoy, Kansas Section Dalton E. Hamilton
8 Gerald Austin, Nashville 16 Charles Friedrichs, Kansas Memorial CWI of the Year Award
9 Thomas S. Malo, Central Louisiana 16 Darin D. Owens, Nebraska
9 Michael J. Magazzu, Mobile 17 Rodney Riggs, Tulsa 2 Brian Cassidy, Long Island
10 Tom W. Kostreba, NW Pennsylvania 17 Brian Bennett, North Texas 4 William Muller, SW Virginia
10 Erick D. Speer, NW Pennsylvania 17 Aaron Obermann, Ozark 5 Jeffrey Green, Florida West Coast
12 Jim Potter, Racine-Kenosha 18 Earl R. Simon Jr., Houston 8 Donnie A. McCray, Nashville
13 Costica Iftimie, Chicago 18 Leslie Crnkovic, Houston 9 Rudy Roy, Acadiana
13 Joe Piano, Illinois Valley 18 J. W. Fregia, Houston 9 Tyson A. Patin, Acadiana
14 Jerry N. Burke, Louisville 18 Christopher A. Young, Houston 9 Michael Stuchlik, Central Louisiana
15 Pamela Lesemann, Northwest 18 Jaime Escamilla, Corpus Christi 9 Joe Carbo, New Orleans
16 Michell R. Joynt, Nebraska 18 Margaret Noble, Sabine 9 Anthony J. DeMarco, New Orleans
16 Sam Newhouse, Kansas City 18 Tommy Gordon, Sabine 10 Frank M. Dragolich, Cleveland
17 Jeremy Cooper, Tulsa 18 John M. McKeehan, Sabine 10 Charlie Cross, Cleveland
18 Jason K. Trosen, Houston 18 Dusty Green, Sabine 10 Mike P. Andrzejewski, NW
18 Drew Fontenot, Lake Charles 20 Clay Sewell, New Mexico Pennsylvania
18 Eric Pesak, Houston 20 Anna Wilson, New Mexico 10 Dan Weidler, NW Pennsylvania
20 Alexyia Barraza, New Mexico 20 Zhenzhen Yu, Colorado 10 Donna J. Bastian, NW Pennsylvania
20 Mario D. Edmonds, Southern 20 Taylor Smith, Utah 13 Tony Sondgeroth, Illinois Valley
Colorado 21 Ashley Wolters, San Diego 14 Daniel Williamson, Louisville
21 Jeff Davis, San Diego 22 Tim Foster, Central Valley 14 Ashley Applegate, Lexington
SOCIETY NEWS
14 Dane Law, St. Louis 9 Brandon Neely, Mobile 14 David J. Blankenship, Tri-River
14 Anthony C. Shell, Tri-River 9 Brandon G. Dubroc, Central 14 Jason M. Blondin, Tri-River
14 Ross Kazmierzak, Indiana Louisiana 14 Thomas W. Garrett, Tri-River
14 Erin R. Krestakos-Fromson, Indiana 10 Charlie Cross, Cleveland 16 Benjamin D. Sutej, Nebraska
15 Ron Weingartz, Northwest 10 Bryan M. Stempka, NW Pennsylvania 16 Grant E. Von Lunen, Kansas City
16 Jeffrey G. Tyler, Nebraska 12 Dan L. Crifase, Racine-Kenosha 17 Scotty Cline, Ozark
16 Grant E. Von Lunen, Kansas City 13 Paul Leadingham, Illinois Valley 18 Daniel Jones, Houston
16 Brandon Boldt, SE Nebraska 14 Thomas M. Milleville, St. Louis 18 Michale Frazier, Houston
17 Ronnie Summerlin, Tulsa 14 Hope Harp, Louisville 18 Horacio Balli, Corpus Christi
17 Andrew Saltsman, North Texas 15 Michael Hanson, Northwest 18 Dakota J. Stockman, Corpus Christi
17 Dallas Patton, East Texas 16 Grant E. Von Lunen, Kansas City 20 Roy Herrera, New Mexico
18 Sri Krishna Chimbli, Houston 16 Jeffrey G. Tyler, Nebraska 20 Paul Foley, New Mexico
18 Ronald S. Payne, Corpus Christi 17 Dallas Patton, East Texas 20 Jeremy Mowry, Colorado
18 Jesse M. Torres, Corpus Christi 18 Dan Jones, Sabine
20 Roy Herrera, New Mexico 18 Larry A. Wright, Lake Charles
20 Mike Rupert, New Mexico 19 Royce Schuening, Portland District Private Sector Instructor
20 David Ambriz, New Mexico 20 Zachariah Bergstrom, New Mexico
20 Stanely W. Pierce, New Mexico 20 Roger Titus, New Mexico 2 Harry Graham, Philadelphia
20 Rubecca Martinez Dalton, Colorado 20 Mark A. Stadig, Colorado 3 Hugo Garcia, Reading
20 Brad Wilkerson, Utah 21 Lyle J. Palm, San Diego 7 Brett Matthews, Tri-State
20 William G. Payton, Utah 7 William Roth, Cincinnati
21 Lyle J. Palm, San Diego 12 Erik L. Ogren, Racine-Kenosha
22 Bill L. Wenzel, Sacramento Valley Section Private Sector Instructor 12 Bryan R. Hackbarth, Milwaukee
13 Michael G. Bradley, J.A.K.
2 Paul J. Lenox, New Jersey 14 Ashley Applegate, Lexington
District Dalton E. Hamilton 5 Michael Denmark, Florida West Coast 14 Jeremy S. Darnell, Louisville
Memorial CWI of the Year Award 6 Zach Torbell, Rochester 16 Benjamin D. Sutej, Nebraska
9 Albert Theriot, New Orleans 16 Grant E. Von Lunen, Kansas City
2 Jim Dolan, New Jersey 9 Aldo Duron, New Orleans 17 Scotty Cline, Ozark
2 Michael S. Chomin, Philadelphia 10 Lance G. Besse, Stark Central 18 Dan Jones, Sabine
3 Michael Kelly, Reading 10 Benjamin K. Bradbury, Cleveland 18 John Stoll, Houston
3 Stephen Hill, Cumberland Valley 13 Michael G. Bradley, J.A.K. 20 Phil V. Martinez, New Mexico
4 Gary Cleveland, Triangle 14 Adam T. Holt, St. Louis
SOCIETY NEWS
AWS Member Profile
Enrolling in the program’s introductory a welding operating engineer, which
welding course, which was taught at a she describes as a “triple threat.”
local fabrication shop, Porter quickly “I would be able to weld, repair, an-
developed a passion for the craft. She alyze specifications, and maintain and
put in extra hours and practiced on operate the machinery and equipment
the weekends to hone her skills in on a jobsite,” she said.
shielded metal arc, flux cored arc, and Despite her excitement for the fu-
gas tungsten arc welding. ture, Porter stresses that the transition
“In the past [as a civil engineer], I from civil engineer to welder hasn’t
worked on a lot of structural steel re- always been easy. However, with the
habilitation projects, which exclusively guidance of family and friends, she
utilized my technical skills,” she recalled. has found the confidence to follow her
“The intro class helped to strengthen heart and confront adversities.
my manual dexterity and hand-eye “Initially, I wasn’t forthcoming about
coordination when working with metals.” my desire to pursue a new career. Fear
Porter also enrolled in the Brooklyn of failure, setbacks, or inadequacies
Metal Partnership Training Program, clouded my mind. I soon realized I
which provides entry-level metalwork- needed support if I wanted to move
ers with the skills required in the field. further. Speaking with my family and
Nzinga Porter She completed 60 h of classroom learn- close friends about my concerns
ing along with 115 h of hands-on shop changed my reservations. I am grateful
training. In addition to various welding for having their continuous support
Before setting her sails for a career processes, the program taught her how and encouragement,” she explained.
in welding, Nzinga Porter flourished to perform oxyfuel and plasma arc cut- “I’ve had hardships with finances, em-
as a civil engineer in New York’s boom- ting, form and finish components for ployment, and health, but I never let
ing construction industry. Throughout architectural fabrication, and utilize setbacks define me. My passion, cre-
her 15-year career, she has worked on various metalworking tools, including ativity, and determination are enough
several vital infrastructure projects, chipping hammers, clamps, stationary to keep me going forward.”
including the Croton Water Filtration and angle grinders, band saws, sanders, As a female in a male-dominated
Plant in the Bronx; the Dey St. Con- drill presses, and files. field, Porter hopes to serve as an ex-
course in Manhattan; the Brooklyn The program also gave her the op- ample that women belong in the weld-
Bridge; and the 151st St. Pedestrian portunity to practice for the American ing industry.
Bridge over the Henry Hudson Parkway. Welding Society shielded metal arc “Despite the misconceptions, weld-
“I’ve always had a strong desire to welding 3G qualification test, which ing can be a great career for women.
become a builder and took pride in my she passed. She also holds qualifica- Women are reliable employees, fast
direct involvement in prominent proj- tions for burning/cutting as well as learners, and exercise excellent dexter-
ects within New York City’s infrastruc- Occupational Safety and Health Ad- ity,” she affirmed. “The future is bright
ture,” she said. ministration credentials. for welding, especially for nontradi-
These demanding projects often Taking her newfound knowledge tional candidates like women.”
required Porter to be available around- and skills, Porter landed a job as a
the-clock, resulting in long work days. welding assistant at two local metal
Over the years, the lack of work-life shops in Brooklyn. However, due to
balance led her to consider leaving the COVID-19 pandemic, she is no
engineering in favor of a career in longer in their employ.
welding. “During the weeknights and week-
“Although I enjoyed and wanted to ends, I would assist in teaching every-
remain in the construction industry, I day people to weld and use tools to
realized I no longer wanted to contin- create functional pieces for the home,”
ue working as a civil engineer. I spoke she said.
with local trades persons who gave in- Despite the setback, Porter is still
sightful and critical feedback about pushing forward with her welding
working in construction,” she recol- career and has been awarded several
lected. “Welding was a skill that could scholarships to help her achieve her
be used by any and all labor trades. I academic goals. In August, she began
felt by choosing welding it would lead the welding program at Lincoln Tech-
me closer to my desired job.” nical Institute, where she is working
Porter welded for the first time at toward a welding certificate. She is
the age of 36 when she participated in slated to graduate in early 2021. Pictured is a hollow metal cube Porter
a pre-apprenticeship training program. created from design to fabrication.
Porter’s future plans are to become
CONNECTICUT — Albert J. Moore Jr. (third from left) holds an award honoring a Section scholarship in his name. With him are (from left)
son Albert J. Moore III, son-in-law Donald Scott, granddaughter Olivia Scott, daughter Jill Brandon, grandson Gabe Scott (back), grandson
Cole Brandon, daughter Brandie Scott, granddaughter Alena Scott, and his son-in-law’s father Don Scott.
CONNECTICUT — Walter Chojnacki (center) is seen with his family, daughter Jill Patten, wife Sue Chojnacki, granddaughter Erin Patten,
and son Wally Chojnacki, as he received an award for a new Section scholarship bearing his name.
SECTION NEWS
modern piece of metal art by artist Summary: A donation of personal pro-
District 3 David Cerny. The creation consists of tection equipment (PPE) was made
Sean Moran, director 40 stainless steel plates grouped into to Hall County high school Lanier Col-
(717) 885-5039 seven segments, which independently lege & Career Academy for its dual-
sean.moran@phillyshipyard.com rotate 360 deg. When its segments are enrollment program with Lanier Tech-
aligned, the piece becomes a giant nical College. Since the COVID-19
head with water spewing out of its pandemic hit, students can no longer
District 4 mouth into the surrounding pool. share PPE equipment.
Mr. Lynn Showalter, director
(757) 848-8029
lynneshowalter@gmail.com
District 5 District 6
Howard Record, director Ronald Stahura, director
(352) 816-0835 (716) 207-7869
CHARLOTTE howard@rtdtools.com rstahura@esab.com
July 22
Location: Charlotte, N.C. ATLANTA NIAGARA FRONTIER
Summary: Attendees of the nine-year August 12 August 1
American Welding Society Certified Location: Lanier Technical College, Location: Niagara, N.Y.
Welding Inspector seminar viewed a Oakwood Campus, Oakwood, Ga. Summary: Aaron Struzik and Ben-
CHARLOTTE — Attendees of the nine-year Certified Welding Inspector seminar included (from left) Wes DeBruhl, Frank Davis, Ron
Theiss (instructor), John Lacombe, Jerry Sowell, Gary Streeter Sr., Cliff Hartsfield, Eric Dickerson, Brad Arrowood, Jason Gibson, and Joe
Chasteen.
ATLANTA — Seen with donated personal protection equipment for welding students are Courtney Harmon, Lanier Technical high
school coordinator; Christian Tetzlaff, dean of applied technology and transportation; Kevin Reese, Lanier Technical welding instructor;
Section Chair René Engeron; and Caleb Hammond, welding instructor and high school dual-enrollment coordinator.
SPPA
ARKING CONNEC
CTIONS –
2020 AW
WS MEMBERSHIPP CHALLENGE
What
h it is:
Be the spark
p that ignites
g s the people you know to
beecome AW
WS members, and get rewards.
Ho
ow it woorks:
Buuild up points throug hout the year for each
AWS
W Member you recr uit: 5 Points per Individual
Meembership and 1 Pointt per Student Membership.
What
W you get:
Grand Prize Winnner: $200 gift card
2nd Plaace: $100 gift card
3rd Plaace: $100 gift card
4th Plaace: $100 gift card
Alll other participants earnning 10 or more points will get
WS branded merchandisse based on points accrued
AW
thrroughout 2020.
The Fine Print: All AWS members in good standinng may participate and are eligiblle to receive rewards based on points accrued
Januarry 1 – December 31 31, 2020
2020. Paarticipant eligibillity is determined at the sole discre
retion of AWS program administrators. AWS staff
members and administrators of commercial / corrporate or educational packaagges that inccllude AWS memberships in the pricing
structure are not eligible to participate. Foor more innformation, visit aws.org/be-the-sppark
Section News - FNL OCT 2020.qxp_Layout 1 9/10/20 1:23 PM Page 59
SECTION NEWS
jamin Woodward were selected as the
two 2020 Niagara Frontier Scholarship District 8 District 11
winners. First-place winner Struzik re- James Thompson, director Phillip Temple, director
ceived $3000 to attend Niagara Coun- (256) 347-6481 (734) 546-4298
ty Community College’s welding tech- jim.thompson@wallacestate.edu nwcllc_ptemple@att.net
nology program in Sanborn, N.Y.
Woodward received $1500 and will be
continuing his studies at Alfred State
College’s welding program. District 9 District 12
Michael Skiles, director Dale Lange, director
(337) 501-0304 (715) 732-3645
dale.lange@nwtc.edu
District 7 michaelskiles@cox.net
CHICAGO
August 12
Location: Mama Luigi’s Restaurant,
Bridgeview, Ill.
Summary: The Section’s board mem-
bers gathered to discuss old and
new business, as well as plan future
gatherings.
District 14
Tony Brosio, director
NIAGARA FRONTIER — Aaron Struzik NIAGARA FRONTIER — Benjamin
(765) 215-7506
was the first-place recipient of a Woodward was the recipient of a $1500 tbrosio@yahoo.com
$3000 Section scholarship. Section scholarship.
CHICAGO — August meeting attendees included (sitting from left) Anghelina Iftimie, Elisabeth Darnell, Craig Tichelar, and John Hessel-
tine. Standing (from left) are Marty Vondra, Cliff Iftimie, Section Chair Dave Viar, and Jim Greer.
SECTION NEWS
COLORADO
District 15 August 1 District 21
Michael Hanson, director Location: Bailey, Colo. Sam Lindsey, director
(763) 221-5951 Summary: The Section presented an (858) 740-1917
mikhan318@comcast.com award to Mark Stadig. slindsey@sandiego.gov
August 12
Location: Glendale, Colo.
District 16 Summary: The Section hosted a Certi- District 22
fied Welding Inspector (CWI) seminar Robert Purvis, director
Karl Fogleman, director at the Hyatt Place in Glendale, Colo. (916) 599-5561
(402) 677-2490
fogleman3@cox.net purviswelds@gmail.com
District 17
J Jones, director ANNOUNCE YOUR
(832) 506-5986
drtourch@yahoo.com SECTION’S ACTIVITIES
If you would like to submit a calen-
dar notice or recap your Section’s
District 18 in-person or virtual activities, visit
Thomas Holt, director aws.org/membership/page/wj-
(409) 721-5777 submission-form.
tholt@techcorr.com
Please keep in mind the Welding
Journal publication cut-off is usually
the 20th of the month, for two
District 19 months ahead. For example, if you
want to have your activities in the
Shawn McDaniel, director
December Journal, the deadline is
(509) 793-5182
October 20.
shawnm@bigbend.edu
COLORADO — CWI seminar attendees are seen with Richard Campbell (far left), welding fellow with Bechtel Construction, and Bob
Teuscher (far right), AWS past president and president of AJAX Industries.
PERSONNEL
Ford Announces President company determine how to reshape sis laboratory. Meduri brings more
and CEO the industry through software plat- than eight years of engineering re-
forms, connectivity, artificial intelli- search and testing experience. He
Ford Motor Co., gence, automation, and new forms of earned his PhD in mechanical engi-
Dearborn, Mich., a propulsion. He was named chief oper- neering at Texas Tech University in
multinational au- ating officer in February. 2019; was a founding member of the
tomaker, has school’s Mechanical Engineering Grad-
named Jim Farley uate Student Association; and organ-
as president and ized scientific workshops for local
CEO effective AEIS Hires Metallurgical youth. He also presented his work at
Oct. 1. He was also Engineer major conferences, including The Min-
elected to Ford’s erals, Metals & Materials Society con-
board of directors. Atlas Evalua- ference in 2019 and 2020; the Materi-
He succeeds Jim tion & Inspection als Research Society conference in
Hackett, who has Services (AEIS), 2018; the National Association of Cor-
J. Farley retired from the South Plainfield, rosion Engineers conference in 2016;
company. Farley N.J., a testing, in- and the American Institute of Aero-
collaborated with Hackett over the spection, and cer- nautics and Astronautics as well as the
past three years to develop and exe- tification compa- American Society of Mechanical Engi-
cute Ford’s Creating Tomorrow To- ny, has appointed neers conferences in 2014. Specializ-
gether plan. He joined the automaker Chandra Sekhar ing in medical devices, he has co-au-
in 2007 as the global head of market- Meduri as lead thored a number of technical papers
ing and sales and went on to lead Lin- metallurgical engi- on material science applications. After
coln, Ford South America, Ford of Eu- neer. This newly finishing his PhD, Meduri was a post-
C. S. Meduri
rope, and all Ford global markets in created role will doctoral researcher at the University
successive roles. In April 2019, he was focus on solving of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, Tex.,
chosen to lead new businesses, tech- metallurgical and technical challenges where he worked in the Advanced Ma-
nology and strategy team, helping the and overseeing the firm’s failure analy- terials and Manufacturing Lab. He also
supported a team of seven engineers, from the Manufacturing Institute. The Obituaries
resulting in a U.S. patent and six tech- award recognizes rising female talent
nical publications. Before that, he was currently employed in the manufactur- Suleiman S. Yero
a materials science researcher in the ing industry who have made signifi-
Functional Materials and Devices Lab cant contributions in their careers. Suleiman S. Yero passed away on
at Texas Tech University. Prior to that, Brady began her career at Newport May 27, following an illness. Yero re-
Meduri was a research engineer at News Shipbuilding in June 2016, ceived his bachelor of engineering de-
MetCel, a student-faculty team startup where she supported propulsion plant gree in mechanical engineering at
at Oklahoma State University, where work on aircraft carriers. She also Bayero University, Kano, Nigeria, and
he worked on product development serves as a mentor through a program a master of science degree in welding
for the aerospace, marine, and safety that pairs qualified individuals with el- engineering from Cranfield University,
equipment industries. He also led two ementary school-aged children in low- UK. He began his career in various
joint-venture research projects with income areas. technical positions with offshore con-
equipment manufacturers in the Unit-
ed States, resulting in an expansion of
their product lines.
tractors. He first Technologies Conference & Exhibition the company. He spent more than 30
joined Acergy UK 2019 in Dammam, Saudi Arabia. Yero years at Foster Wheeler until his retire-
Ltd. in Aberdeen was a passionate welding engineer, a ment in 1993 as its director of welding
as a welding and loving father and husband, and dutiful services. Additionally, he was a member
materials engi- son and brother. of the American Welding Society, join-
neer, where he ing in 1956 and achieving Life Member
was responsible status in 1991. After retirement, Leclair
for technical sup- began studying plein-air oil painting
port for offshore Guy Armand Leclair and gained recognition for his impres-
and onshore proj- sionist renderings of the Genesee Valley
ects. He subse- Guy Armand and the Charlevoix coast of Quebec. He
quently had short Leclair of Fairport, was a member of the All-Weather Gang
S. S. Yero
stints with Subsea N.Y., passed away (a plein-air painting group), the Penfield
7, Aberdeen, UK, peacefully on Au- Art Association, and the Rockport Art
as a senior welding and materials engi- gust 3. He was 92. Association in Massachusetts. He re-
neer, then Technip as a senior welding Leclair was a ceived accolades in numerous juried art
engineer, before returning to Subsea 7 leader and innova- shows. His work is part of the Molson
as the principal welding and materials tor on welding Collection in Canada. Sharing his artis-
engineer in a contract role. He went on technology. Before tic expertise, he volunteered as a docent
to join Saudi Aramco in 2014 as a graduating from at the Memorial Art Gallery in
welding and metallurgical engineer, McGill University Rochester, N.Y. With a strong belief that
working in Saudi Arabia. Yero joined in Montréal, Que- “knowledge is power,” Leclair was espe-
the American Welding Society (AWS) G. A. Leclair bec, in 1951, he cially proud to have attended each of his
in 2007. In 2017, he took over as first gained practical ex- 11 grandchildren’s graduations and was
vice chair of the AWS Saudi Arabia Sec- perience at Noranda Mines. In 1962, he supportive of their pursuits. He is sur-
tion and continued in this office until moved to the United States with his vived by his wife of 67 years, Aline
his passing. He has served in multiple family and began working for Foster Hébert, four children, two sisters,
leadership roles in the Section, includ- Wheeler Energy Corp. as a metallurgical brother-in-law, grandchildren, and
ing technical committee chair for the welding engineer. He was an inventor great-grandchildren. WJ
Materials Performance & Welding on two patents he developed while at
HI-BRIAN, Holtec International’s portable robotic welding unit, ITSA’s first-ever webinar discussed topics such as thermal
welds the lid to the shell of an MPC-89. spray career opportunities. The screenshot above highlights
some of those occupations.
tion as a business of the decade winner by Business New twin-span bridge features eight traffic lanes with shoulders,
Hampshire Magazine and the New Hampshire Association of dedicated bus and emergency vehicle lanes, and one of the
Chamber of Commerce Executives. The company earned the longest bike and pedestrian bridge paths of its kind.
top spot for the manufacturing and technology category. With more than 50 million vehicles utilizing the bridge
“Hypertherm is humbled and honored by this recogni- every year, it’s three miles in length, making it the longest in
tion. It is beyond anything we expected, as we know the cal- the state. The bridge, which contains a cable-stayed span de-
iber of companies who call the Granite State home,” said sign, opened to traffic in 2018 and crosses one of the widest
Evan Smith, Hypertherm’s CEO and president. “As a compa- areas of the Hudson River. AEIS was selected to perform
ny owned by more than a thousand associates working in special inspections on the bridge and provide inspection
New Hampshire, we fully believe that the triple bottom line personnel.
of people, planet, and profit go hand in hand and are ad-
vanced together in our community, especially now as we all
face the challenges brought on by the current pandemic.” Industry Notes
Hypertherm was invited to apply because of its selection
as the magazine’s 2011 Business of the Year. Nearly 50 • The ASTM International Conference on Additive Manu-
judges scored applications through two rounds of competi- facturing (amcoe.org/icam-2020), scheduled to be in Orlan-
tion. They admired the respect the company has in the fabri- do, Fla., on November 16–20, will now be virtual. It’s being
cation industry, its reputation for technological and manu- organized by 60 members of the scientific committee and
facturing excellence, and the depth of its community work. led by co-chairs Nima Shamsaei, director of the National
Center for Additive Manufacturing Excellence, and Moshen
Seifi, ASTM International’s director of global additive manu-
AEIS Completes Inspection and Testing facturing programs. “This year’s event will be the largest
Ventures in New York conference we have held to date and will consist of more
than a dozen tracks and double the number of speakers with
respect to last year’s event,” said Seifi.
CLASSIFIEDS
email: joe@joefuller.com
Phone: (979) 277-8343
Fax: (281) 290-6184
Our products are made in the USA
Used Equipment for Sale
mitrowskiwelding.com
sales@mitrowskiwelding.com
(800) 218-9620
(713) 943-8032
ADVERTISER INDEX
Arcos IBC
arcos.us (800) 233-8460 Liburdi 22
liburdi.com (800) 991-2100
Bug-O 27
bugo.com (800) 245-3186 Lincoln Electric OBC
lincolnelectric.com (888) 935-3877
Cor-met Inc. 27
cor-met.com (800) 848-2719 Red-D-Arc 10
reddarc.com (866) 733-3272
Diamond Ground 11
diamondground.com (805) 498-3837 Select-Arc IFC
select-arc.com (800) 341-5215
Elco 5
wire-wizard.com (517) 782-8040 Thermach 17
thermach.com (920) 779-4299
Electron Beam 15
electronbeam.com (815) 935-2211 Vectis Automation 37
vectisautomation.com (970) 852-5200
Fabtech 41
aws.org/virtual2020 (800) 443-9353 Weld Engineering 25
weldengineering.com (508) 842-2224
Flexovit USA 12
flexovitabrasives.com (800) 689-3539 Welder Training & Testing 62
wtti.com (800) 223-9884
Gedik Welding 13
gedikwelding.com (201) 679-5551
WELDING RESEARCH
SUPPLEMENT TO THE WELDING JOURNAL, OCTOBER 2020
Sponsored by the American Welding Society
ABSTRACT Introduction
The susceptibility of austenitic, ferritic, and duplex stain-
Stainless steels are widely used in chemical and power
less steels to solidification cracking was evaluated by the industries. Numerous investigations have shown they are
new Transverse Motion Weldability (TMW) test. The focus susceptible to cracking during solidification (Refs. 1–9).
was on austenitic stainless steels. 304L and 316L were Austenitic stainless steels that are more resistant to solidifica-
least susceptible, 321 was significantly more susceptible, tion cracking tend to have a fusion-zone microstructure that
and 310 was much more susceptible. However, some 321 is not fully austenite . They also contain a small but signifi-
welds were even less susceptible than 304L welds. These cant amount (≥ 5%) of lacy or skeletal -ferrite (Refs. 1–3).
321 welds were found to have much finer grains to better Consequently, it has been widely accepted for decades that
resist solidification cracking. Quenching 321 during welding the lacy/skeletal structure resists solidification cracking.
revealed spontaneous grain refining could occur by hetero- Depending on its composition, when a liquid austenitic
geneous nucleation. For 304L, 316L, and 310, a new explana-
tion for the susceptibility was proposed based on the con-
stainless steel is cooled to solidify, the primary solidification
tinuity of the liquid between columnar dendrites; a discon- phase (the dendrites that form from the liquid) can be either
tinuous, isolated liquid allows bonding between dendrites -ferrite, which is body-centered cubic (bcc), or austenite ,
to occur early to better resist cracking. In 304L and 316L, which is face-centered cubic (fcc). Usually, if the primary solidi-
the dendrite-boundary liquid was discontinuous and isolat- fication phase is , the resultant fusion zone is almost fully
ed, as revealed by quenching. The liquid was likely depleted with little . However, if the primary solidification phase is ,
by both fast back diffusion into -dendrites (body-centered the resultant fusion zone tends to show a lacy/skeletal struc-
cubic) and the L + + reaction, which consumed L while ture at room temperature. Thus, austenitic stainless steels that
forming . In 310, however, the dendrites were separated by solidify with primary tend to be significantly less susceptible
a continuous liquid that prevented early bonding between to solidification cracking than those that solidify with primary
them. Back diffusion into -dendrites (face-centered cubic)
was much slower, and the L + + reaction formed little .
, as shown by Masumoto et al. (Ref. 4).
Quenching also revealed skeletal/lacy formed in 304L and Shankar et al. (Ref. 3) summarized many factors that
316L well after solidification ended; thus, skeletal/lacy have been proposed to explain the benefits of having a
did not resist solidification cracking, as had been widely small, but significant, amount of -ferrite in the matrix
believed for decades. The TMW test further demonstrated (Refs. 10–16). For instance, the irregular crack path caused
that both more sulfur and slower welding can increase sus- by the presence of skeletal/lacy in the matrix can arrest
ceptibility. cracks. The lower interface energy of / than that of either
/ or / can resist cracking. The skeletal/lacy refines
and thus resists cracking. The large / interface area dis-
KEYWORDS perses sulfur (S) and phosphorus (P). The transforma-
• Transverse Motion Weldability Test • Stainless Steels
tion reduces tensile stresses. Much more S and P can dis-
• Solidification Cracking • Welding • Austenitic • Ferritic solve in , and less S and P are thus present at grain bound-
• Duplex • 304 • 310 • 316 • 321 • 430 • 2205 aries to cause cracking. Thermal stresses are reduced be-
cause is more ductile than and because the thermal ex-
pansion of is less than that of . Homogenization of S and
https://doi.org/10.29391/2020.99.024
WELDING RESEARCH
A
A B
WELDING RESEARCH
C Si Mn P S Ni Cr N Cu Mo Co Ti Fe Creq/Nieq
304L-A 0.025 0.54 1.74 0.025 0.014 8.06 18.06 0.063 0.25 balance 1.761
304L-B 0.022 0.42 1.33 0.035 0.003 8.070 18.11 0.037 balance 1.890
304L-C 0.024 0.48 1.05 0.020 0.002 8.060 18.13 0.050 balance 1.831
304L-D 0.022 0.43 1.10 0.026 0.003 8.090 18.32 0.053 balance 1.847
310 0.050 0.580 1.76 0.020 0.001 19.10 24.1 0.03 0.08 0.11 balance 1.128
316L 0.024 0.4 1.55 0.029 0.002 10.04 16.71 0.031 0.29 2.03 balance 1.619
321A 0.033 0.49 1.01 0.031 0.001 9.0 17.10 0.013 0.32 0.30 0.3 balance 1.658
321B 0.013 0.49 1.76 0.027 0.001 9.2 17.14 0.016 0.49 0.46 0.2 balance 1.743
321C 0.014 0.50 1.82 0.025 0.0001 9.26 17.35 0.01 0.29 0.36 0.16 balance 1.767
430 0.160 0.287 0.45 0.030 0.0044 0.319 16.05 0.043 balance 2.719
2205 0.016 0.390 1.39 0.028 0.001 5.790 22.27 0.170 0.25 3.13 0.19 balance 2.589
initiation, the one-speed option of the TMW test was used austenitic stainless steels 304L, 310, 316L, and 321 were
as illustrated in Fig. 1A. The lower sheet moved at a single, quenched with Wood’s metal (75C) during bead-on-plate
constant speed (V) throughout the test. If the weld did not welding. The workpiece was 102 mm (4 in.) long, 51 mm (2
crack, the experiment was repeated at a higher V to see if in.) wide, and 1.6 mm (11⁄ 6 in.) thick. It was welded along the
cracking would occur. To evaluate the susceptibility to centerline in the length direction. This thinner workpiece al-
crack propagation, however, the two-speed option was lowed for more effective quenching than the workpiece for lap
used as illustrated in Fig. 1B. The first speed of the lower welding. DCEN was used with Ar shielding. The torch travel
sheet was set higher at 0.7 mm/s to ensure crack initiation. speed was 1.35 to 1.48 mm/s (3.2 to 3.5 in./min), the welding
After a short weld length of about 14 mm, the lower sheet current was 48 to 55 A, and the voltage was 7.8 to 10 V. The
was suddenly slowed down to a second speed (e.g., 0.2 arc length was initially set at 2.3 mm.
mm/s). If the crack did not propagate, the experiment was The resultant welds were cut, polished, and etched (Ref.
repeated at the same first speed and a higher second speed 17). 304L and 316L were electrochemically etched with a so-
to see if the crack would propagate. A servo motor was pro- lution consisting of 60 g of oxalic acid in 600 mL of water.
grammed with the help of a computer to move an Al plate The voltage was 10 V and the etching time was 15 s. 310 was
along a sliding stage and push the lower sheet. etched with mixed acids consisting of 10 mL HNO3, 20 mL
Gas tungsten arc welding (GTAW) was conducted under HCl, and 30 mL H2O. The etched samples were examined by
the following conditions: 110-A welding current with the di- optical microscopy — with or without differential interfer-
rect current electrode negative (DCEN) polarity, 10- to 11-V ence contrast (DIC) — and scanning electron microscopy
arc, 1.27-mm/s (3-in./min) welding speed (torch travel (SEM). EBSD was used to identify the phases present in the
speed), 3.15 × 10–4 m3/s (40 ft3/h) Ar gas flow rate, and 3.2- microstructure.
mm-diameter tungsten electrode with a 15-deg electrode-tip
angle. The torch was inclined 20 deg toward the joint. Results
To initiate the TMW test, the servo motor was turned on
to push the lower sheet, the arc was initiated 2 s afterward, Figure 2 shows an example of 304L after the TMW test. A
the torch carriage was turned on 4 s afterward, the arc was schematic sketch of the TMW test (Refs. 18, 19) is also includ-
extinguished 30 s afterward, and the carriage and the motor ed as a reference. Figure 3 shows examples of the workpiece af-
were then turned off to end the experiment. ter the one-speed TMW test for crack initiation. For 316L, no
The crack length was measured after each experiment. cracking occurred at the lower-sheet speed of 0.25 mm/s, but
The normalized crack length was plotted against the lower- cracking occurred all the way to the end at 0.30 mm/s. For
sheet speed V. In the one-speed test, the normalized crack 310, full cracking occurred even at the relatively low speed of
length equaled the crack length divided by the weld length. 0.15 mm/s, which indicated a higher crack susceptibility than
On the other hand, in the two-speed test, the normalized 316L. On the other hand, for 304L, no cracking occurred even
crack length equaled the crack length under the second at 0.30 mm/s, thus indicating a lower crack susceptibility than
speed divided by the weld length under the second speed. 316L. Thus, Fig. 3 suggests the crack susceptibility decreased
A transition range of the lower-sheet speed V was identi- in the order of 310 > 316L > 304L.
fied, over which the normalized crack length increased Figure 4 shows examples of the 310 workpiece after the
from 0 (no crack) to 1 (full crack). one- and two-speed TMW tests. The one-speed test in Fig.
To help explain the results of the crack susceptibility tests, 4A shows a crack that stopped shortly after initiation. The
WELDING RESEARCH
A B
A B
C D
C D
WELDING RESEARCH
Discussion
Consistency with Varestraint Test Results
In the TMW test, the lower the V level of the transition
range, the easier it was for the motion of the lower sheet to
cause solidification cracking and hence the higher the crack
susceptibility became. The two-speed TMW test results shown
in Figs. 6 and 7 are summarized in Fig. 8. V was plotted upside
down so the highest crack susceptibility was near the top of
the plot just like the highest crack length was near the top for
the most crack-susceptible alloy in the Varestraint test. Figure
8 shows the transition range was at the lowest V level for 310
and highest for 304L and 316L, i.e., the crack susceptibility
was the highest for 310 and lowest for 304L and 316L. The
crack susceptibility decreased in the order of 310 > 2205 > 430
> 316L > 304L-C.
Based on the WRC-1992 diagram (Ref. 22), the Cr equiva-
lent was defined as Creq = wt-% Cr + wt-% Mo + 0.7 (wt-%
Nb). The Ni equivalent was defined as Nieq = wt-% Ni + 35 Fig. 5 — SEM image showing the dendritic fracture surface of
304L-C, which confirms solidification cracking.
(wt-% C) + 20 (wt-% N) + 0.25 (wt-% Cu). In Table 1, the
Creq/Nieq ratio was calculated using these formulas for each
stainless steel based on its composition. In Fig. 9, the transi- mm/s. When the one-speed TMW test was to be conducted
tion range of V for each stainless steel in Fig. 8 was plotted for comparison, 321A was already used up. The additional
against its Creq/Nieq ratio. The curve of the crack susceptibili- material available, i.e., 321B, differed from 321A slightly in
ty vs. Creq/Nieq based on the Varestraint data (Ref. 1) was also composition. As shown in Table 1, 321A contained 0.013
included in Fig. 9 for comparison. As shown, the relative wt-% N and 0.3 wt-% Ti, and 321B contained 0.016 wt-%
crack susceptibility based on the transition range of V in the N and 0.2 wt-% Ti. The slightly higher Ti content of 321A
TMW test for crack propagation was consistent with the rela- was probably required to match its slightly higher C con-
tive crack susceptibility based on the Varestraint test data. tent, i.e., to tie up C in the HAZ as TiC so that no Cr23C6
This suggests the TMW test can be applied to stainless steels would form to cause grain-boundary corrosion (Refs. 1, 2).
to evaluate their susceptibility to solidification cracking. As Figure 10B shows the results of the one-speed TMW test of
mentioned previously, however, the TMW test has several 321B. The transition range of V was 0.34–0.35 mm/s,
significant advantages over the Varestraint test (Ref. 21). which was much higher than that of 321A (0.13–0.20
mm/s) and, in fact, even higher than that of 304LC
321 Microstructure and Crack Resistance (0.27–0.325 mm/s, as shown previously in Fig. 6A). Thus,
the crack susceptibility of 321B was much lower than that
Figure 10A shows the results of the two-speed TMW of 321A and even lower than that of 304LC, as shown in
test on 321A. The transition range of V was 0.13–0.20 Figs. 10C–D and 8. These results were surprising.
A B C
Fig. 6 — Results of the TMW two-speed tests of austenitic stainless steels: A — 304L; B — 316L; C — 310.
WELDING RESEARCH
A B
Fig. 7 — Results of the two-speed TMW test: A — Ferritic stainless steel 430; B — duplex stainless steel 2205.
Although 321A was tested with the two-speed TMW better rearrange the grains to accommodate tensile strains
test and 321B was tested with the one-speed TMW, the without cracking (Ref. 23). It can also have a greater grain-
test results shown in Fig. 10 were not believed to be affect- boundary area to distribute and dilute harmful impurities (S
ed significantly by the difference between the two versions and P) or low-melting segregates (Ref. 2). However, it is un-
of the TMW test. As will be shown later in this research, clear how fine grains formed in 321B. To answer the question,
the results of the one-speed test were similar to those of quenching was conducted during welding. A 1.6-mm-thick
the two-speed test. Thus, the much lower crack susceptibil- sheet was selected because quenching can be effective in bead-
ity of 321B than 321A was likely to be real. As shown in on-plate welding of a thin sheet. Additionally, the weld pool
Table 1, Creq/Nieq = 1.658 for 321A and 1.743 for 321B. As can be pushed out and the sheet can be rapidly cooled by liquid
indicated by the Varestraint test curve in Fig. 9, the crack Wood’s metal. The material 321C contained 0.01 wt-% N and
susceptibility did not change much between Creq/Nieq = 1.5 0.16 wt-% Ti, as shown in Table 1. It had a Creq/Nieq = 1.767,
and Creq/Nieq = 2.0. Thus, the small difference between which is very close to that of Creq/Nieq = 1.743 for 321B.
Creq/Nieq = 1.658 for 321A and Creq/Nieq = 1.743 for 321B Figure 11 shows the evidence of equiaxed dendritic
could not be the reason for the much lower crack suscepti- grains growing in the mushy zone of 321C. Particles ap-
bility of 321B. peared to be present within the equiaxed grains (indicated
To find out why 321B was much less susceptible to so- by arrows). They are likely TiN particles. Equiaxed grains
lidification cracking than 321A, their lap welds were cut have been shown to nucleate from TiN particles in GTAW
vertically along the welding direction near the centerlines of ferritic stainless steels containing N and Ti (Refs. 24,
of the welds. The welds made without moving the lower 25). For instance, Koseki et al. (Ref. 25) showed (by
sheet were selected because the longitudinal vertical cross quenching with liquid Sn during welding) equiaxed grains
sections could be prepared without interference from grew from the TiN nuclei in a Fe-19Cr-2Mo-0.19Ti-
cracks. 0.0162N ferritic stainless steel. They showed coarse
The fusion-zone microstructure of 321A is shown in Fig. columnar grains in GTAW of Fe-17Cr-0.007Ti-0.0097N but
10E. Coarse, long, columnar grains grew along the welding fine equiaxed grains in Fe-17Cr-0.3Ti-0.0092N.
direction and upward toward the top of the weld. As shown In this study, an attempt was made to measure the com-
in Fig. 10F, fine equiaxed grains were present in the fusion position of the particles, such as those inside the equiaxed
zone of 321B, much finer than those in 321A. The enlarged grains in Fig. 11B. However, no significant Ti was found be-
micrographs in Fig. 10G and F again show the striking mi- cause TiN particles already dissolved in the acid solution
crostructural difference between the two 321 stainless during etching. Only larger particles that still remained
steels. Both lacy and skeletal were visible in the fusion showed significant Ti.
zone, the latter of which was easier to see in 321A. To still verify that TiN can form in 321B, its solidifica-
To sum up, significant grain refining was evident in 321B, tion path was calculated based on its exact composition in
and it significantly reduced the crack susceptibility. Grain re- Table 1. The thermodynamics software Pandat™ 2019 (Ref.
fining is known to reduce the susceptibility to solidification 26), the iron-alloy database PanFe 2019 (Ref. 27), and the
cracking (Ref. 2). A semisolid with fine equiaxed grains can Scheil solidification model (Ref. 2) were used. As shown in
WELDING RESEARCH
WELDING RESEARCH
A B A
C
D
E F
G H
WELDING RESEARCH
WELDING RESEARCH
A B C
Fig. 13 — Results of the TMW one-speed tests of austenitic stainless steels: A — 304L; B — 316L; C — 310.
into -dendrites (bcc) and the L + + reaction that con- back diffusion in fcc (); 2) insignificant L + + reaction; and
sumed L while forming . 3) long, straight -dendrite boundaries.
As in 304L, lacy or skeletal formed not in the mushy
zone but in the fusion zone far behind it, as shown in Fig. Sulfur Increases Crack Susceptibility
16D. This, again, indicates that the lacy/skeletal structure
cannot resist solidification cracking as was widely believed. To show that the TMW test can correctly determine the ef-
fect of sulfur on solidification cracking, additional TMW test-
310 Microstructure and Crack Resistance ing was conducted using 304L-B as the lower sheet, which con-
tained 0.003 wt-% S, and 304L-A as the upper sheet, which
Figure 17A is the vertical section of the Fe-Cr-Ni phase contained significantly more S, i.e., 0.014 wt-% S. The trans-
diagram at 55 wt-% Fe (Ref. 42). It shows Fe-25Cr-20Ni, verse cross section of the lap weld showed it consisted of 37%
which is close to 310, should solidify as primary austenite . of the upper sheet and 63% of the lower sheet. Assuming good
Figure 17B displays the microstructure of quenched 310. mixing in the weld pool, the weld S content (S%)weld = 0.37
Columnar -dendrites grew in the mushy zone. As shown, (0.014%) + 0.63 (0.003%) = 0.007%. The results of the one-
310 (~ Fe-25Cr-20Ni) should solidify as primary . This has speed TMW test are shown in Fig. 18, with those of 304L-D
been confirmed by EBSD (Ref. 17). As displayed in Fig. 17C, (Fig. 13A) included for comparison. As shown, the crack sus-
deep into the mushy zone, the -dendrites were still separat- ceptibility at 0.007 wt-% S was higher than that at 0.003 wt-%
ed by continuous liquid films. The L + + reaction formed S. This is consistent with the well-known fact that S increases
particles of , as can be seen in Fig. 17D. However, overall, the susceptibility of stainless steels to solidification cracking
the L + + reaction did not significantly form in 310 and (Refs. 1, 2).
did not significantly consume liquid. As mentioned previ-
ously, back diffusion is much slower in fcc solids than in bcc Slower Welding Speed Increases Crack
solids. Thus, the liquid along the boundaries of -dendrites
was not significantly depleted either by back diffusion nor Susceptibility
by the L + + reaction. Consequently, columnar -den-
drites were separated from each by continuous liquid films To determine the effect of the welding speed (torch travel
and could thus be easily pulled apart under tension to cause speed) on solidification cracking, 304L-C was welded at
solidification cracking. 0.635 mm/s in the two-speed TMW test and compared to
The long, straight boundaries between -dendrites can be that welded at 1.27 mm/s. As shown in Fig. 19, the crack
another problem for 310. As can be seen in Fig. 17B, the - susceptibility was higher at the lower welding speed. When
dendrites often have thick primary arms with relatively short the welding speed was reduced under the same welding cur-
secondary arms. In fact, the macrographs of 310 welds show rent and voltage, the mushy zone became larger, thus
coarse, straight grains in the fusion zone (Ref. 17). On a long, widening the region vulnerable to solidification cracking.
straight boundary between -dendrites, even a very small
amount of liquid may be enough to form a continuous film, as Accuracy of Test Results
shown in Fig. 17C. A long, straight boundary is also an easy
path for crack initiation and propagation. To sum up, 310 re- The transition range is shown as the average ± error in
sists cracking poorly because thin continuous liquid films per- Figs. 6, 7, 10, 13, 18, and 19. The average was taken as the
sist along -dendrite boundaries due to the following: 1) slow centerline of the range, and the error was taken as the half
WELDING RESEARCH
A B
C
Fig. 14 — Crack susceptibility ranking of 310 > 316L > 304L: A — Based on the one-speed test (Fig. 13); B — based on the two-speed
test (Fig. 6); C — based on the Varestraint test. In A and B, the higher the transition range of V needed to cause full cracking, the
lower the susceptibility. Susceptibility ranking in A and B is consistent with that in C.
width of the range. Below the range, the normalized crack (Ref. 28), and Senda et al. (Ref. 29).
length was always zero. Above the range, it was always 1.0. When the welding conditions and the sample size are
The accuracy or repeatability of the test results is further changed, the test results are expected to be affected. Howev-
discussed as follows. er, if reasonable changes are made to all stainless steels be-
First, in each of the 12 different cases tested, a distinct ing tested, the resultant relative crack susceptibility should
transition range was observed. Second, an average of ten welds be similar. This is true with other test methods as well, such
were made in each case to determine the transition range. The as Varestraint testing.
error in the location of the transition range was mostly from
± 0.005 to ± 0.030 mm/s. In three cases, the error was larger at Strain Rates
± 0.050 mm/s. The first case involved ferritic stainless steel
430 (Fig. 7A), which is known for its severe grain growth in the It has been recognized that the strain rate plays an impor-
HAZ. The coarse HAZ grains could affect the fusion-zone grain tant role in solidification cracking (Refs. 37, 38, 43). It is obvi-
structure significantly, and this effect might vary from weld to ous that a significant amount of strain may not necessarily
weld, thus widening the error. cause solidification cracking if it is applied so slowly that solid-
The second case was duplex stainless steel 2205 (Fig. 7B). ification already ends while the strain is still increasing.
The amount of austenite and ferrite relative to each other In the Varestraint test, the global strain and the strain rate
and their distributions might vary somewhat from work- in the workpiece can be very different from the local strain and
piece to workpiece, thus widening the error. The last case in- strain rate in the mushy zone, where solidification cracking oc-
volved welding two sheets of different S contents (Fig. 18B). curs (Refs. 44, 45). Coniglio (Ref. 44) pointed out that, in Vare-
The relative amounts of the upper sheet (0.014 wt-% S) and straint testing, the weld metal shows significantly higher
the lower sheet (0.003 wt-% S) in the weld might vary some- strains (more than 2%) and strain rates (more than 100%/s)
what from weld to weld, thus causing more error. In any than the applied strain (0.5%), and the strain rate (40%/s) on
case, making more than ten welds may change the width of the workpiece surface was calculated based on = H/(2R + H)
the transition range somewhat, but the location (the center- × 100%. is strain, H is workpiece thickness, and R is the ra-
line of the width) of the transition range on the V-axis dius of the bending block. So, in the Varestaint test, the self-
should change less. Since the crack susceptibility is deter- induced strain is not necessarily minimized so that the exter-
mined by the location of the transition range, not the width, nally applied strain alone can be used as the crack-susceptibili-
the test results are expected to be accurate. The accuracy of ty index. This seems to be also true with other tests. Bakir et
the test results has also been shown by their consistency al. (Ref. 46) showed in the controlled tensile weldability test of
with the data from Lippold and Kotecki (Ref. 1), Arata et al. 304 stainless steel by laser beam welding that the local strain
WELDING RESEARCH
B A B A
D
C
E
D
C
F
Fig. 16 — Microstructure near the centerline of the top sur-
face of the 316L weld quenched during welding: A — Behind
the weld pool (DIC); B — SEM image of the upper boxed area
in A; C — lower boxed area in A; D — lacy/skeletal far
behind A (DIC).
WELDING RESEARCH
A A B
B
C D
D
Fig. 18 — Effect of sulfur content on solidification cracking
susceptibility shown by the one-speed TMW test: A, C —
304L-D with 0.003 wt-% S; B, D — 304L-A (0.014 wt-% S)
welded to 304L-B (0.003 wt-% S).
WELDING RESEARCH
A B
C D
WELDING RESEARCH
Toshihiko Koseki, Department of Materials Engineering, The 21. Savage, W. F., and Lundin, C. D. 1965. The Varestraint test.
University of Tokyo, Japan, for helpful discussions. Welding Journal 44(10): 433-s to 442-s.
22. Kotecki, D. J., and Siewert, T. A. 1992. WRC-1992 constitu-
tion diagram for stainless steel weld metals: A modification of the
References WRC-1988 diagram. Welding Journal 71(5): 171-s to 178-s.
23. Flemings, M. C. 1972. Solidification Processing. New York,
N.Y.: McGraw-Hill.
1. Lippold, J. C., and Kotecki, D. J. 2005. Welding Metallurgy and 24. Villafuerte, J. C., Kerr, H. W., and David, S. A. 1995. Mecha-
Weldability of Stainless Steels. Hoboken, N.J.: John Wiley and Sons. nisms of equiaxed grain formation in ferritic stainless steel gas
2. Kou, S. 2020. Welding Metallurgy, 3rd ed. Hoboken, N.J.: John tungsten arc welds. Materials Science and Engineering A 194(2):
Wiley and Sons. 187–191. DOI: 10.1016/0921-5093(94)09656-2
3. Shankar, V., Gill, T. P. S., Mannan, S. L., and Sundaresan, S. 25. Koseki, T., Inoue, H., Fukuda, Y., and Nogami, A. 2003. Nu-
2003. Solidification cracking in austenitic stainless steel welds. Sad- merical simulation of equiaxed grain formation in weld solidifica-
hana 28(3–4): 359–382. DOI: 10.1007/BF02706438 tion. Science and Technology of Advanced Materials 4(2): 183–195.
4. Masumoto, I., Tamaki, K., and Kutsuna, M. 1972. Hot cracking DOI: 10.1016/S1468-6996(03)00026-3
of austenitic stainless steel weld metal. Transactions of Japan Welding 26. Pandat™. 2019. Phase diagram calculation software package
Society 41(11): 1306–1314. DOI: 10.2207/qjjws1943.41.1306 for multicomponent systems. CompuTherm LLC: Madison, Wis.
5. David, S. A., Goodwin, G. M., and Braski, D. N. 1979. Solidifica- 27. PanFe. 2019. Thermodynamic database for iron alloys.
tion behavior of austenitic stainless steel filler metals. Welding Journal CompuTherm LLC: Madison, Wis.
58(11): 330-s to 336-s. DOI: 10.2172/5563513 28. Arata, Y., Matsuda, F., and Saruwatari, S. 1974. Varestraint
6. Elmer, J. W., Allen, S. M., and Eagar, T. W. 1989. Microstructural test for solidification crack susceptibility in weld metal of
development during solidification of stainless steel alloys. Metallurgi- austenitic stainless steels. Trans. of JWRI 3(1): 79–88.
cal and Materials Transactions A 20(10): 2117–2131. DOI: 29. Senda, T., Matsuda, F., Takano, G., Watanabe, K., Kobayashi,
10.1007/BF02650298 T., and Matsuzaka, T. 1971. Fundamental investigations on solidi-
7. Matsuda, F., Nakagawa, H., and Lee, J. 1987. Weld cracking in fication crack susceptibility for weld metals with Trans-Varestraint
duplex stainless steel (Report I). Trans. of JWRI 16(2): 343–349. test. Trans. of the Japan Welding Society 2(2): 141–162.
8. Cross, C. E., Coniglio, N., Westin, E. M., and Gumenyuk, A. 30. Hillert, M., and Qiu, C. 1990. A reassessment of the Cr-Fe-
2011. Laser weldability of stainless steel. Hot Cracking Phenomena Ni system. Metallurgical Transactions A 21(6): 1673–1680. DOI:
in Welds III. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, pp. 131–144. DOI: 10.1007/ 10.1007/BF02672583
978-3-642-16864-2-8 31. Lubbehusen, M., and Mehrer, H. 1990. Self-diffusion in -
9. Tate, S. B., Javernick, D. A., Lienert, T. J., and Liu, S. 2016. Laser iron: The influence of dislocations and the effect of magnetic phase
weldability of 21Cr-6Ni-9Mn stainless steel: Part I — Impurity effects transition. Acta Metall. Mater. 38(2): 283–292. DOI: 10.1016/
and solidification mode. Welding Journal 95(10): 371-s to 383-s. 0956-7151(90)90058-O
10. Borland, J. C., and Younger, R. N. 1960. Some aspects of 32. Bowen, A. W., and Leak, G. M. 1970. Solute diffusion in
cracking in welded Cr-Ni austenitic steels. British Welding Journal alpha- and gamma-iron. Metallurgical Transactions 1: 1695–1700.
7(1): 22–59. 33. Liu, J., and Kou, S. 2015. Effect of diffusion on susceptibili-
11. Matsuda, F., Nakagawa, H., Uehara, T., Katayama, S., and Ara- ty to cracking during solidification. Acta Materialia 100: 359–368.
ta, Y. 1979. A new explanation for role of delta-ferrite improving weld DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2015.08.064
solidification crack susceptibility in austenitic stainless steel (materi- 34. Liu, J., and Kou, S. 2016. Crack susceptibility of binary alu-
als, metallurgy, weldability). Transactions of JWRI 8(1): 105–112. minum alloys during solidification. Acta Materialia 110: 84–94.
12. Hull, F. C. 1967. Effect of delta ferrite on the hot cracking of DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2016.03.030
stainless steel. Welding Journal 46(9): 399-s to 409-s. 35. Liu, J., and Kou, S. 2017. Susceptibility of ternary alu-
13. Pellini, W. S. 1952. Strain theory of hot tearing. Foundry minum alloys to cracking during solidification. Acta Materialia 125:
80(11): 125–133. 513–523. DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2016.12.028
14. Brooks, J. A., Thompson, A. W., and Williams, J. C. 1984. A 36. Liu, J., Duarte, H. P., and Kou, S. 2017. Evidence of back dif-
fundamental study of the beneficial effects of delta ferrite in reduc- fusion reducing cracking during solidification. Acta Materialia 122:
ing weld cracking. Welding Journal 63(3): 71-s to 83-s. 47–59. DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2016.09.037
15. Kujanpaa, V. P. 1985. Effect of steel type and impurities in 37. Kou, S. 2015. A criterion for cracking during solidification.
solidification cracking of austenitic stainless steel welds. Metal Con- Acta Materialia 88: 366–374. DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2015.01.034
struction 17(1): 40R–46R. 38. Kou, S. 2015. A simple index for predicting the susceptibili-
16. Thier, H., Killing, R., and Killing, U. 1987. Solidification ty to solidification cracking. Welding Journal 94(12): 374-s to 388-s.
modes of weldments in corrosion resistant steels — How to make 39. Fu, J. W., Yang, Y. S., Guo, J. J., Ma, J. C., and Tong, W. H.
them visible. Metal Construction 19: 127–130. 2009. Formation of two-phase coupled microstructure in AISI 304
17. Yu, P., Thompson, K. J., McCarthy, J., and Kou, S. 2018. Mi- stainless steel during directional solidification. Journal of Materials
crostructure evolution and solidification cracking in austenitic Research 24(7): 2835–2840. DOI: 10.1557/jmr.2009.0282
stainless steel welds. Welding Journal 97(11): 301-s to 314-s. DOI: 40. Fu, J. W., and Yang, Y. S. 2013. Origin of the lathy ferrite in
10.29391/2018.97.026 AISI 304 stainless steel during directional solidification. Journal of Al-
18. Soysal, T., and Kou, S. 2017. A simple test for solidification loys and Compounds 580: 191–194. DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2013.
cracking susceptibility and filler metal effect. Welding Journal 05.107
96(10): 389-s to 401-s. 41. Fu, J., Sun, J., Cen, X., Zhang, X., Li, F., and Wu, Y. 2018.
19. Soysal, T., and Kou, S. 2018. A simple test for assessing so- Growth behavior and orientation relationships in AISI 304 stain-
lidification cracking susceptibility and checking validity of suscep- less steel during directional solidification. Materials Characteriza-
tibility prediction. Acta Materialia 143: 181–197. DOI: 10.1016/ tion 139: 241–248. DOI: 10.1016/j.matchar.2018.03.015
j.actamat.2017.09.065 42. Lippold, J. C., and Savage, W. F. 1979. Solidification of
20. Soysal, T., and Kou, S. 2019. Effect of filler metals on solidi- austenitic stainless steel weldments: Part I–A proposed mecha-
fication cracking susceptibility of Al alloys 2024 and 6061. Journal nism. Welding Journal 58(12): 362-s to 374-s.
of Materials Processing Technology 266: 421–428. DOI: 10.1016/ 43. Kannengiesser, T., and Boellinghaus, T. 2014. Hot cracking
j.jmatprotec.2018.11.022 tests — An overview of present technologies and applications. Weld-
WELDING RESEARCH
ing in the World 58(3): 397–421. DOI: 10.1007/s40194-014-0126-y tion and transformation behaviour of austenitic stainless steel weld
44. Coniglio, N. 2008. Aluminum alloy weldability: Identifica- metals solidified as primary ferrite: Study of solidification and sub-
tion of weld solidification cracking mechanisms through novel ex- sequent transformation of Cr-Ni stainless steel weld metals (2nd
perimental technique and model development. Doctoral thesis, Report). Welding International 11(12): 937–949.
Otto von Guericke University, Magdeburg, Berlin. 50. Inoue, H., Koseki, T., Ohkita, S., and Fuji, M. 2000. Forma-
45. Coniglio, N., Cross, C. E., Michael, T., and Lammers, M. tion mechanism of vermicular and lacy ferrite in austenitic stain-
2008. Defining a critical weld dilution to avoid solidification crack- less steel weld metals. Science and Technology of Welding and Joining
ing in aluminum. Welding Journal 87(8): 237-s to 247-s. 5(6): 385–396. DOI: 10.1179/136217100101538452
46. Bakir, N., Gumenyuk, A., and Rethmeier, M. 2018. Investi- 51. Brooks, J. A., and Garrison, W. M. 1999. Weld microstruc-
gation of solidification cracking susceptibility during laser beam ture development and properties of precipitation-strengthened
welding using an in-situ observation technique. Science and Tech- martensitic stainless steels. Welding Journal 78(8): 280-s to 291-s.
nology of Welding and Joining 23(3): 234–240. DOI: 10.1080/
13621718.2017.1367550
47. Soysal, T., and Kou, S. 2020. Role of liquid backfilling in
reducing solidification cracking in aluminum welds. Science and
Technology of Welding and Joining 25(5): 415–421. DOI: 10.1080/ KUN LIU is a lecturer at the School of Materials Science and
13621718.2020.1732054 Engineering in Jiangsu University of Science and
48. Kou, S., and Le, Y. 1982. The effect of quenching on the solidi- Technology, Zhenjiang, China. PING YU is the former
fication structure and transformation behavior of stainless steel assistant scientist, and SINDO KOU (kou@engr.wisc.edu) is a
welds. Metallurgical Transactions A 13(7): 1141–1152. DOI: 10.1007/ professor at the Department of Materials Science and Engi-
BF02645495 neering, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wis.
49. Inoue, H., Koseki, T., Okita, S., and Fuji, M. 1997. Solidifica-
Note that in each issue of the Welding Journal Research Supplement, we are including
Direct Object Identifier (DOI) numbers with each of the papers published in print and online.
A direct object identifier is a unique alphanumeric string assigned by a registration agency
(we are using Crossref.org) to identify content and provide a persistent link to its location on
the Internet. Our decision to begin assigning a DOI for each paper comes directly from a
request by the research community.
As part of our obligation to Crossref.org, we are asked to provide DOI numbers, when
available, in the references section of papers. So, if you have submitted a paper to the
Welding Journal or are planning on submitting a paper, we ask that you update your
references to include DOI numbers whenever possible.
Thank you.
Annette Alonso
Publisher, Welding Journal
WELDING RESEARCH
https://doi.org/10.29391/2020.99.025
WELDING RESEARCH
A B
Experimental Design
Fig. 2 — Schematic diagram of the experimental design. The workpieces were Q235 mild steel plates with a
dimension of 300 × 60 × 4 mm. ER70S-6 filler wire with a
In the first part of this work (Ref. 6), the interaction mech- diameter of 1.2 mm was used as filler material. Pure argon
anisms between the GTA and the filler wire as a metal conduc- of 99.99% was used as shielding gas with a flow rate of 10
tor were clarified, where a tungsten probe was employed to re- L/min. The tungsten electrode was 2.4 mm in diameter
place the filler wire and to interact with the arc, while the dy- and was placed with a protruding length of 5 mm from
namic behaviors of the liquid metal generated at the end of the the nozzle. Bead-on-plate welding was done in the flat
filler wire were avoided. Therefore, in this second part of the position.
work, the metal transfer and the behavior of pendant droplets, As illustrated in Fig. 2, the experiments designed in this
as well as their effects on the arc, are thoroughly discussed. part of the work had the end of the filler wire melt in dif-
This work helps to understand the dynamic behaviors of the ferent spatial areas of the arc column to study the dynamic
liquid droplet and paves the way for real-time control of weld behaviors of the liquid metal generated at the end of the
quality based on the proposed sensing method. filler wire. In all experiments from #1 to #5, filler wire was
employed and fed from the front of the weld pool, and the
ratio of the welding speed (v) to wire feed speed (vf) was
Experimental Setup and Design constant. The height of the filler wire was changed by ad-
justing the electrode tip to workpiece distance (ETWD) so
Experimental Setup that its end could be melted at different heights and the
filler wire could also be melted at different horizontal posi-
Figure 1 shows the experimental system. As presented in tions by changing vf. The specific experimental parameters
*Note: ETWD means electrode tip to workpiece distance; **Note: ETFWD means electrode tip to filler wire distance.
WELDING RESEARCH
Fig. 3 — Arc shapes of GTAW with filler wire: A — Bridging transfer (ETWD = 6 mm); B — free-flight transfer (ETWD = 9 mm).
are shown in Table 1, and these experiments were conduct- transfer modes. After the filler wire was inserted into the arc
ed with the welding torch in the stationary position while column, the arc shape was indeed disturbed to various de-
the welding workbench was moving. grees. As the melting of the filler wire generated a more dy-
As in the first part of the work (Ref. 6), the probe volt- namic liquid droplet, the arc shape also changed dynamical-
age (Upa, i.e., the voltage between the filler wire and the ly. Similar to the effect of the metal probe on the arc shape
workpiece) and the arc voltage (U, i.e., the voltage between in the first part of this work (Ref. 6), the deflection of the
the tungsten electrode and the workpiece) were collected arc shape and its cross-section change can also be observed
simultaneously at a frequency of 1024 Hz. The electrical after the filler wire was introduced.
signal data was then filtered by a 12th-order Butterworth For the interrupted bridging transfer in Fig. 3A, when
low-pass filter with a passband frequency of 100 Hz and a there was a liquid bridge between the weld pool and the
40 dB attenuation at a cutoff frequency of 150 Hz. In addi- filler wire (at 73.24 and 75.20 ms), the arc was attracted by
tion, the measured welding current was used to ensure the filler wire, otherwise the arc would be repelled by the
that the voltage fluctuations were not caused by the cur- filler wire (at 0 and 81.05 ms). This can be judged by the de-
rent fluctuations. gree of deflection on the left side of the arc. For the free-
flight transfer in Fig. 3B, the filler wire repelled the arc the
entire time due to the absence of the liquid bridge. This is
Results and Discussion because the liquid bridge integrated the filler wire and the
weld pool, so the filler wire was no longer suspended alone
Metal Transfer in the arc column but became part of the anode, which
changed the main conductive path of the arc.
In GTAW with filler wire, the metal transfer modes were Critical metal transfer modes were realized in Experi-
generally divided into bridging transfer and free-flight ments #1 and #2, and the corresponding electrical signals
transfer. During the bridging transfer, a short-circuit liquid are respectively shown in Figs. 4 and 5. In Fig. 4, the unin-
bridge was formed between the end of the filler wire and the terrupted bridging transfer was maintained for a period of
weld pool. While in free-flight transfer, the liquid droplet time as shown in I1. U was relatively stable, and Upa was
could not immediately contact the weld pool after it left the nearly zero due to the short circuiting between the weld
end of the filler wire. Apparently, the metal transfer mode is pool and filler wire. During this time, the filler wire had sta-
related to the distance of the filler wire from the weld pool. ble effects on the arc just like a static metal probe, while also
Figure 3 shows the arc shapes in these two typical metal attracting the arc. However, the voltage signal was not as
WELDING RESEARCH
stable during interrupted bridge transfer as it was during In Fig. 5, the liquid metal is in a hybrid mode of interrupted
uninterrupted bridge transfer. From I2 to I3, the liquid bridging transfer (I1–I3) and free-flight transfer (I4–I5). It is
bridge suddenly broke, contributing to a moderate increase conspicuous that the trends of voltage signals under the inter-
in U and a steep rise in Upa, and it displayed the opposite rupted bridging transfer mode shown in Figs. 4 and 5 are dif-
rule for the process from I4 to I5. This is because the liquid ferent. The short-circuit liquid bridge only existed for a very
bridge brought the anode closer to the cathode, which short- short time during the bridging transfer at the ETWD in Fig. 5,
ed the travel of the electron flow and made U smaller. which caused the voltage signals to stay at a higher value for a
The formation and breaking of the liquid bridge also longer time and generate significant pulse-like fluctuations.
caused the changes in both U and Upa, while its effect on Upa The frequency of metal transfer was also lower, which reduced
was more significant. In the practical welding process, it also the frequency of the arc being periodically attracted and re-
caused a flickering arc and a series of crack sounds. When pelled by the filler wire. Moreover, the arc voltage, after each
the filler wire was close to the workpiece, the interrupted metal transfer, was almost lower than before each metal trans-
bridging transfer with the above phenomenon easily to oc- fer because the liquid metal that originally occupied the local
curred at a fast metal transfer frequency. arc space was transferred to the weld pool and the influence of
WELDING RESEARCH
Fig. 6 — Flow chart of the image processing algorithm. Fig. 7 — Schematic diagram of image processing.
the filler wire on the arc voltage was reduced. It could be in-
ferred that the difference in arc voltage before and after the
metal transfer was related to the amount of metal transferred
each time. As for free-flight transfer, the arc voltage will only
drop in moderation due to the absence of the liquid bridge.
Furthermore, once the droplet is separated from the end of
the filler wire, the distance between the filler wire and the weld
pool will suddenly increase and the space occupied by the
droplet will be released in a short time, so Upa will rise immedi-
ately. Besides, after metal transfer, the droplet will sometimes
oscillate (e.g., I6–I10), which will cause diverse degrees of fluc-
tuations in both U and Upa, just like the dynamic effects of the
metal probe on the arc in the first part of the work (Ref. 6).
From the above, Upa could be used to conveniently moni- Fig. 8 — Schematic diagram of tracking the feature point.
tor the status of the metal transfer. The information, such
as the mode and frequency of metal transfer and the exis-
point of the fitted line segment was selected as a starting
tence time of the short-circuit liquid bridge, could be more
point to track the feature point along the edge of the droplet
clearly reflected in Upa than in U.
(as demonstrated in ROI2 in Fig. 7). During the tracking
procedure, if an edge point of the droplet was detected in
Characterization of Droplet Behavior the left neighborhood of the current point (as shown in Fig.
8), the detected point would become a new current point,
As shown in Fig. 5, the liquid droplet can oscillate back otherwise the current point was the feature point. D can be
and forth at the end of the filler wire before it enters the derived by calculating the distance from this feature point to
weld pool. To characterize this dynamic behavior, an image the symmetry axis of the electrode, which can then be used
processing algorithm was developed to calculate the distance to geometrically characterize the dynamic behavior of the
between the edge of the droplet and the symmetry axis of liquid droplet in the time domain.
the tungsten electrode (D). Its processing flow and schemat- The behaviors of pendant droplets were studied based
ic diagram are respectively shown in Figs. 6 and 7. on Experiments #3, #4, and #5, where different wire feed
Figure 7 shows two regions of interest (ROIs), the tung- speeds were employed. Experimental results at different
sten electrode (ROI1) and the filler wire (ROI2), were seg- wire feed speeds are shown in Fig. 9. In Fig. 9A, within a
mented from the original image, and their edge points were period of time after the last metal transfer, the pendant
extracted by a Sobel operator. For ROI1, the position of the droplet remaining at the end of the filler wire was too
symmetry axis of the electrode was obtained by calculating small to oscillate significantly (I1 and I2), and D and U
the average horizontal coordinate of electrode edge points. kept the downward and upward trends, respectively, which
For ROI2, Hough transformation was used for linear fitting showed that the end of the filler wire was getting closer
of the wire edges, and then the distance (number of pixels) and closer to the arc axis during this period. Once the liq-
between the two fitted line segments was calculated to ob- uid droplet contacted the weld pool, it quickly transferred
tain the actual width of one pixel based on the actual diame- from the filler wire to the weld pool under the influence of
ter of filler wire. To locate the feature point of the droplet surface tension and gravity. Since the amount of filler wire
edge closest to the symmetry axis of the electrode, one end- melted in a short time was less than the amount of liquid
WELDING RESEARCH
Fig. 9 — Experimental results at different wire feed speeds: A — Experiment #3 (vf = 50.8 cm/min); B — Experiment #4 (vf = 76.2
cm/min); C — Experiment #5 (vf = 101.6 cm/min).
metal entering the weld pool, the end of the filler wire was ment (as shown in I2). Such a trend gradually became less
far away from the symmetry axis of the tungsten electrode pronounced with increasing wire feed speed, as shown in
(as shown in I1) when the droplet transfer was just com- Fig. 9B and C.
pleted. Moreover, the further the filler wire was from the As the melting rate of the filler wire gradually stabilized
arc, the slower the melting rate, so the end of the filler and the size of the droplet increased, the oscillation of the
wire approached the arc again at a decaying rate of move- pendant droplet gradually became apparent. It can be ob-
WELDING RESEARCH
A B
WELDING RESEARCH
A A
B B
C C
Fig. 11 — Spectrogram of continuous wavelet transform in Ex- Fig. 12 — Spectrogram of continuous wavelet transform in Ex-
periment #4 (vf = 76.2 cm/min): A — D; B — Upa; C — U. periment #5 (vf = 101.6 cm/min): A — D; B — Upa; C — U.
WELDING RESEARCH
ent volumes, and the dynamic oscillation in different areas of and Regional Demonstration Project of Marine Economic
the arc column. Information about these dynamic behaviors Innovation and Development (Grant No.: BHSF2017-10).
can be easily reflected in the probe voltage (Upa).
2) For the bridging transfer, the formation and breaking
of the liquid bridge will cause the changes in both Upa and References
arc voltage (U), while its effect on Upa is more significant. For
free-flight transfer, once the droplet is separated from the 1. Huang, Y. M., Wu, D., Zhang, Z. F., Chen, H. B., and Chen, S.
filler wire, Upa will also respond immediately. Thus, Upa can B. 2017. EMD-based pulsed TIG welding process porosity defect
be used to conveniently monitor the metal transfer. detection and defect diagnosis using GA-SVM. Journal of Materials
3) Due to the asymmetrical force, the droplet is liable to Processing Technology 239: 92–102. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatpro-
oscillate, and will cause the voltage signals to oscillate after tec.2016.07.015
having a volume. The increase in the wire feed speed will 2. Chokkalingham, S., Chandrasekhar, N., and Vasudevan, M.
bring the droplet closer to the arc axis and weaken the asym- 2012. Predicting weld bead width and depth of penetration from
metry of the force, thus tending to reduce the initial oscilla- infrared thermal image of weld pool using artificial neural net-
tion frequency. Besides, Upa can more clearly characterize the work. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 23(5): 1995–2001. DOI:
droplet oscillation than U. 10.1784/insi.2012.54.5.272
3. Wang, H., and Kovacevic, R. 2002. Feasibility study of
In the practical GTAW process, a stable and reasonable acoustic sensing for the welding pool mode in variable-polarity
metal transfer may not always be guaranteed because of the plasma arc welding. Proceeding of the Institute of Mechanical En-
dynamic time variation of this process and other random gineers, Part B. Journal of Engineering Manufacture 216(10):
factors, such as unstable wire feeding, the subsidence of the 1355–1366. DOI:10.1243/095440502320405449
weld pool during the welding of butt joints, and the varia- 4. Wang, Z. J., Zhang, Y. M., and Wu, L. 2010. Measurement
tion of the deposited layer height caused by heat accumula- and estimation of weld pool surface depth and weld penetration in
tion during GTA-based additive manufacturing. Thus, it pulsed gas metal arc welding. Welding Journal 89(6): 117-s to 126-s.
makes sense to introduce in-process monitoring and even 5. Chen, J. S., Chen, J., Zhang, K., Feng, Z., and Zhang, Y. M.
feedback control of quality stability. In light of this, the 2018. Dynamic reflection behaviors of weld pool surface in pulsed
probe voltage may be a good indicator of characterizing the GTAW. Welding Journal 97(6): 191-s to 206-s. DOI: 10.29391/
2018.97.017
droplet behaviors and would be a candidate signal to moni- 6. Zou, S. Y., Wang, Z. J., Hu, S. S., Zhao, G. C., Wang, W. D., and
tor the process stability. From this perspective, the sensing Chen, Y. Q. 2020. Effects of filler wire intervention on gas tungsten
method proposed in this work paves the way for real-time arc: Part I — Mechanism. Welding Journal 99(9): 246-s to 254-s.
control of the weld quality for joining, such as orbital weld- DOI: 10.29391/2020.99.023
ing or welding in all positions, as well as the quality of GTA-
based additive manufacturing.
SHUANGYANG ZOU, ZHIJIANG WANG (wangzj@tju.edu.cn), SHENG-
Acknowledgments SUN HU, GUANCHENG ZHAO, and WANDONG WANG are with the
Tianjin Key Laboratory of Advanced Joining Technology, School
of Materials Science and Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin,
China. YOUQUAN CHEN is with the Department of Mechanical
This study is supported by the National Natural Science Engineering, College of Humanities & Information, Changchun
Foundation of China (Grant No.: 51505326), Natural Sci- University of Technology, Changchun, China.
ence Foundation of Tianjin (Grant No.: 16JCQNJC04300),
Peer review of research papers is now managed through an online system using Editorial Manager software.
Papers can be submitted into the system directly from the Welding Journal page on the AWS website (aws.org) by
clicking on “submit papers.” You can also access the new site directly at editorialmanager.com/wj/. Follow the in-
structions to register or log in. This online system streamlines the review process, and makes it easier to submit
papers and track their progress. By publishing in the Welding Journal, more than 70,000 members will receive the
results of your research.
Additionally, your full paper is posted on the American Welding Society website for FREE access around the
globe. There are no page charges, and articles are published in full color. By far, the most people, at the least cost,
will recognize your research when you publish in the world-respected Welding Journal.