Group Presentation Rubrics
No. of Group Evaluated : 5
Criteria
1.Content/ Research
4 to >3.0 pts
Advanced - Exceeds expectations •
Does a full share of work or more •
Assigns a clearly defined role; group
members perform roles effectively •
Always considers all views and helps
team to reach fair decision • Never
argues with teammates • Group tries
2. to solve its problems by itself without
Cooperation/ Participation seeking outside help
4 to >3.0 pts 3 to >2.0 pts
Advanced - Exceeds expectations • Competent - Meets expectations •
Collects and contributes accurate Collects and contributes mostly
content • Goes above and beyond to accurate content • At times, takes
research information • initiative to find extra information •
Communicates and shares all Shares information with the group •
information with the group • In-depth With insights and critical thinking in
insights and critical thinking most part
Ratings Points
3 to >2.0 pts
Competent - Meets expectations •
Does an equal share of work • Assigns
roles, but roles are not clearly defined
or consistently adhered to • Usually
considers all views and helps team to
reach fair decision • Rarely argues •
Group seldom solves its problems as a
team and asks classmates or teacher
for help
2 to >1.0 pts
Progressing - Does not fully meet
expectations
• Collects and contributes somewhat
accurate content • Uses only materials
provided • Shares some information
with the group • Lacks insights and
critical thinking
1 to >0 pts
2 to >1.0 pts
Progressing - Does not fully meet
expectations
• Does almost as much work as others
• Assigns roles, but roles are not
adhered to • Often sides with friends
instead of considering all views •
Sometimes argues • Group settles
problems and gives up easily
1 to >0 pts
3 3
Beginning - Does not meet Beginning - Does not meet
expectations expectations
• Collects and contributes • Does less work than other group
inaccurate content • Does not members • No effort made to
utilize resources effectively • Keeps assign roles to group members •
information to self; does not share Acts as cliques or individuals rather
with group • Neither insight nor than group • Arguments within
critical thinking is present group • Little attempt to solve
problems; gives up easily
language • Some members did not
3.Presentation 4 to >3.0 pts appropriate body language •
1 to >0 pts contribute to the presentation
Advanced - Exceeds expectations • Members contribute equally to the
Beginning - Does not meet presentation
Presentation is clever and original
expectations • Little creativity used;
• Engaging; captures interest of 1 to >0 pts
bland •
4
audience • Appropriate variety of
Beginning - Does not meet
Presentation is hard to follow;
expectations
visual aids • Visual aids add to or
• Little creativity used; bland •
poorly organized • No use of visual
Presentation is hard to follow;
clarify presentation • Each
poorly organized • No use of visual aids • Presenter cannot be heard;
aids • Presenter cannot be heard;
no eye contact; poor body
presenter speaks clearly and
no eye contact; poor body language • Some members did not contribute to the presentation
loudly; good eye contact;

TOTAL SCORE 10

Evaluated by : (Print name and signature of evaluator) Group Leader: Jose Jericho P. Bengil
Group Members:
Avenido, Vyazze
Cutara, Warren
Sacayan, Phoebe
Torralba, Patrick
Vergara, Micah