You are on page 1of 3

Nonmodified Silica Nanoparticles

Decrease Water Invasion Into Atoka Shale

S hales account for 75% of the all


footage drilled and are responsible
for 90% of wellbore-stability problems.
TABLE 1—INVENTORY OF SELECTED UNMODIFIED
SILICA NANOPARTICLE DISPERSIONS
3
Number Label NP (wt%) NP size (nm) SG (g/cm ) pH
Maintaining wellbore stability is one
1 G 15.5 5 1.103 10.2
of the more critical aspects of oil and
2 D 39.7 12 1.299 9.6
gas drilling. The main cause of shale
3 A 30.2 7 1.22 10
instability for both soft and hard shales
4 E 50 22 1.242 9
is water absorption and subsequent 5 B 30.4 10–15 1.2 10
swelling and sloughing of the wellbore. 6 C 30.7 7–9 1.2 10
Laboratory data shows the positive 7 F 40.8 10–20 1.307 10.1
effect of adding commercially available,
inexpensive, nonmodified silica
nanoparticles (particle size varies from of minutes. It was stored in oil, and, dur- with the lower face of the shale. The sim-
5 to 22 nm) to water-based drilling ing preparations for testing, it was stored ulated pore fluid was a 4 wt% solution of
muds and their effect on water invasion in a controlled-humidity desiccator. Use sea salt that had a 0.98 water activity. A
into shale. of shales that have dried out or that are test fluid was flowed across the top of a
reconstituted is not acceptable for the shale sample (Fig. 2) at a constant pres-
tests that were run in this study. sure (approximately 250 psi), and the
Experimental Methods Muds Used. Three types of water- buildup of fluid pressure in a small sealed
Materials Used. Nanoparticles. A based muds were used in this study: a chamber located at the bottom of the
total of 22 different types of nanoparti- freshwater mud (FWM), a thick bentonite shale was recorded.
cles were obtained from four manufac- mud, and a low-solids mud (LSM). It was
turers. Of these samples, only seven— found that, in all tests, the presence of Experimental Procedures. Thermal-
NP-G, NP-D, NP-A, NP-E, NP-B, NP-C, 10  wt% concentration of nanoparticles Stability Test. The thermal-stability test
and NP-F—were nonmodified, nonacid- reduced the permeability of the shale. consisted of adding 10 wt% nanoparti-
ic, and commercially available (Table 1). cles to a water-based mud (FWM) then
Shale Properties. Shale is a sedi- Test Equipment for Measuring Shale heating it to 176°F for 16 hours. The mud/
mentary rock that mineralogically con- Permeability. A pressure penetration nanoparticle mixtures that had unac-
sists of clays, quartz, and other silicate (PP) test was used to measure shale per- ceptable properties were rejected, and
and carbonate minerals. Because of meability. The test consisted of three the remaining mud/nanoparticle mix-
their high clay content, shales tend to steps. Seawater was first flowed through tures were then subjected to the PP test.
absorb water from a water-based mud, the shale sample, followed by a base PP Tests. The three-step testing pro-
which results in swelling and sloughing mud, and then by a base mud that con- cedure was used because it was found that
of the wellbore. tained 10 wt% nanoparticles. the shale test samples did not have the
In this study, a hard and preserved The experimental setup (Fig. 1) con- same original permeability. It was decid-
Atoka shale was used. Great care was sisted of several devices used to achieve ed to first flow seawater through the shale
taken to preserve the shale at its native a continuous flow of the test fluid across sample until equilibrium was reached
water activity. The shale was not exposed the top face of the shale sample while the to produce saturated shale samples that
to air for any period of time over a couple simulated pore fluid was kept in contact have the same starting conditions.
For the second step, a PP test was
run using the base mud to obtain a base-
This article, written by Editorial Manager Adam Wilson, contains highlights of paper
mud permeability for that sample. Final-
SPE 146979, “Decreasing Water Invasion Into Atoka Shale Using Nonmodified Silica
ly, a PP test was run using the base mud
Nanoparticles,” by J. Cai, SPE, China University of Geosciences; M.E. Chenevert, SPE, that contained 10 wt% nanoparticles.
and M.M. Sharma, SPE, The University of Texas at Austin; and Jim Friedheim, SPE, The percent permeability reduction was
M-I Swaco, prepared for the 2011 SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, obtained by dividing the permeability
Denver, 30 October–2 November. The complete paper was published in the March difference achieved during Step 3 by that
2012 issue of SPE Drilling & Completion, Pages 103–112. of Step 2 (times 100).

For a limited time, the complete paper is free to SPE members at www.jptonline.org.

JPT • FEBRUARY 2013 141

NT146979.indd 141 1/16/13 2:33 PM


nanoparticles work well for Atoka shale,
NPT NPT
while other sizes may be needed for
other shale types.
Effect of Nanoparticle Concentra-
O-ring O-ring tion in Pure Nanoparticle Dispersions.
Top Cap / -in.
1 16 Shale-permeability tests were performed
1.25 in. holes at nanoparticle concentration levels of
30.2, 10, and 5% with NP-A and NP-B for
comparative purposes.
Recess For Porous Plate Bolt The pure nanoparticle dispersions
Bolt
Shale Sample with a concentration greater than or
Recess for Shale Sample
equal to 10 wt% were more effective at
0.25 in.
shale-pore plugging and reducing fluid
Groove for Porous Plate, 0.056 in.
invasion into shale samples.
Base
Effect of Nanoparticle Concentra-
1.25 in.
/ -in. Tubing
1 16 tion in Muds. For a drilling mud, filtra-
1 in.
tion and rheology properties need to be
suitable to fulfill drilling requirements.
The PP tests run with a 5 wt% nano-
Nut
particle dispersion produced results that
/ -in. Tubing
1 8
were significantly inferior to those of tests
run with a 10 wt% nanoparticle dispersion.
1.75 in. From this comparative study, 10 wt% is the
2.5 in. preferred concentration to be used in muds
for acceptable plugging of the Atoka shale.
3.86 in.

Potential for Field Application. Water-


0.68 in. 0.68 in.
based inhibitive muds containing non-
Fig. 1—Schematic of the test cell.
modified nanoparticles have been
formulated for the first time. These
For the tests performed with the Filtration of Nanoparticle-Containing nonmodified-nanoparticle-based muds
LSM, a similar procedure was followed. Muds. Nano-sized silica could plug the may hold great promise in the future to
throats of the filter paper and formed a address shale-instability problems.
Results and Discussion thin and hard mudcake, which led to a Also, nonmodified pure nanopar-
Thermal-Stability Tests on FWM Con- decline in the API filtration. ticle dispersions with a concentration
taining Nanoparticles. The seven non- equal to or greater than 10 wt% can be
modified and commercial nanoparticle Changes in Shale Permeability With squeezed into unstable shale formations
dispersions (as shown in Table 1) were the Addition of Nanoparticles. All six to plug pore throats, stop fluid invasion,
mixed with FWM to obtain a 10 wt% nonmodified-nanoparticle dispersions and increase wellbore stability. This can
mixture. They were then heated at 80°C were able to reduce the permeability of be especially useful for drilling through
(176°F) for 24 hours then aged at room Atoka shales significantly when com- a short section of a particularly unstable
temperature for another 24 hours. pared with the two mud types studied. shale formation.
All muds were acceptable except for Furthermore, it may be possible to
NP-G. This mud had very poor rheology Effect of Mud Composition on Shale use nonmodified nanoparticles as a com-
and unlimited filtration. For this reason, Permeability. Effect of Nanoparticle ponent in a fracturing fluid to minimize
PP tests were not performed using NP-G. Size. The average pore-throat sizes of a fluid invasion into shale formations and
variety of shales range from 10 to 30 nm. enhance return permeability as a whole.
Rheology of Nanoparticle-Containing Fig. 3 shows the plot of nanoparticle
Muds. The presence of nanoparticles size vs. permeability-reduction percent Conclusions
resulted in higher plastic viscosity (PV) (Δk). Nanoparticles with sizes varying ◗◗It is possible to reduce the
and lower yield point (YP) and Ameri- from 7 to 15 nm had better plugging per- invasion of water-based fluids
can Petroleum Institute (API) filtration. formance than those with sizes greater into shales significantly by use of
The addition of nanoparticles results in than 20 nm. It was speculated that only nonmodified nanoparticles.
a higher solids content, and this results nanoparticles whose particle sizes fall ◗◗Of the six selected nanoparticle
in a higher PV. On the other hand, the in this range could enter and plug the dispersions, NP-A, NP-B, NP-C,
addition of extra water in the nanopar- pore throats of shales and, therefore, NP-D, and NP-F performed very
ticle dispersion diluted the mud and de- minimize fluid invasion into shales. It well when tested with Atoka
creased the YP. also must be pointed out that 7- to 15-nm shale. The permeability reduction

142 JPT • FEBRUARY 2013

NT146979.indd 142 1/18/13 1:27 PM


Backpressure
Regulator

Cylinder Cylinder

Freshwater
Reservoir

Vacuum

Seawater
Fig. 2—Experimental setup of PP test. Reservoir

100
shale was in a range of 45.67
Permeability Reduction, %

to 87.63% by the addition of


90 10 wt% nanoparticles.
80 ◗◗Nanoparticles varying in
size from 7 to 15 nm and at a
70 concentration of 10 wt% are
60 shown to be effective at reducing
y = −2.0782x+102.06 shale permeability, thereby
50 reducing the interaction between
40 the shale and a water-based fluid.
5 10 15 20 25
NP size, nm On the basis of the results obtained,
Bentonite mud LSM Linear (LSM) it is now possible to envision a water-
based drilling fluid containing nanopar-
Fig. 3—Effect of nanoparticle size on permeability-reduction percent (Δk, %). ticles that will have a much smaller inter-
action with the shale. This lower water
for a preserved Atoka shale was preserved Atoka shale was in invasion will lead to fewer wellbore-­
in a range of 73.17 to 99.13% a range of 57.72 to 99.33% instability problems and may lead to the
by the addition of 10 wt% by the addition of 10 wt% use of water-based fluids that are suitable
nanoparticles. nanoparticles. for drilling long sections of horizontal lat-
◗◗For the bentonite muds, the ◗◗For the LSMs, the permeability erals. Such water-based drilling-fluid for-
permeability reduction for a reduction for a preserved Atoka mulations are now being developed. JPT

144 JPT • FEBRUARY 2013

NT146979.indd 144 1/16/13 2:33 PM

You might also like