Professional Documents
Culture Documents
11 Pilares Kns1 Coldsn
11 Pilares Kns1 Coldsn
4
Mux (kN.m) =
1
AXIS Pu-Muy
======
INTERACTION 2' ='0'
BAR POSITION
FROM
16 As 4' (mm2) 16
MAX. BARS ON
Muy (kN.m) = 0 75 >= IN
Muy 0 only45
ID#AAAAEJbpiZ 45 75 50 = '0'
5
TABLE
ID#AAAAEJbpia
INTERACTION
'D' FACE =
w
WORKSHEET
E
TABLE FROM 0 2060 0
4
MuxL (kN.m) = IS 456 (2020-01-
'MuxL'
mcs CELLS(2020-
======
WORKSHEET
01-31
D16
31 TO13:00:03)
E37
13:00:03)
ID#AAAAEJbpia
'MuyL, FROM 16 3.30 % 16
5
MuyL (kN.m) =
Puz
α
M = 1=+' D16
CELL
====== ( PuTO /
0.446*fck*(b.D- 20 0 0 0 20
1
Puz
mcs
E37' - 0.2) / 0.6 .
(2020-01-
ID#AAAAEJbpia
As)+0.75*fy*As
FOR
31 Pu/Puz
Q 13:00:03)
Pu/Puz = 0.42 0.85 CHK Pu CHK Pu CHK Pu CHK Pu 1 3 2 3 1
<0.2,
mcs α(2020-01-
= 1 AND
[Mux/MuxL]^α +
AlphaN = 1.37 FOR
2.00 Pu/Puz >
[Muy/MuyL]^α
31 13:00:03) 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
0.8,
<= 1α=2
WHEN LHS < 1,
LHS =
DESIGN IS O.K.
CHECK = REV.REINF REV.REINF REV.REINF REV.REINF REV.REINF REV.REINF
EVALUATION VERSION
REBAR CALCULATOR VALIDITY 6/30/2008
BAR DIA.(mm) 12 16 20 25 32 As, (mm2) PERCENTAGE STEEL, pc %
NO. OF BARS 0 0 16 0 0 5024 8.04
Give Input Data in white space. The last row will indicate adequecy of the reinforcement as per IS 456.
Rebar dia entered in white spaces at locations 1 to 5, "L9,M9,N9,L10,L11" will be automatically taken up in corresponding
Yellow spaces for reinf. bars. Bars on a face can be 2 to 5, based on c/c distance between longi. bars and dimension of the face,
but the bars will be equally spaced.
In case percentage of steel < 0.8 % and > 4 %, the user will be warranted to REVISE REINF.
-100
11 150.0 150.0
11 300.0 300.0
=====
== 11 150.0 300.0
D#AAAAEJbpia
AAAEJbpiZ
== 11 300.0 150.0
mcs
AAAEJbpiaI(2020-01-
(2020-01- 12 150.0 150.0
1(2020-01-
13:00:03)
00:03)
OR
00:03) FOUR 12 150.0 300.0
NER BAR
ARS ON FACE
FOUR
SAME 13 150.0 150.0
',ON
ENTER
FACE
ALL
BAR POSITION
NER '
NTER 13 150.0 150.0
='0'
POSITION
' 13 150.0 300.0
13 150.0 300.0
41 150.0 150.0
41 300.0 150.0
51 150.0 200.0
51 150.0 250.0
1100
51 300.0 200.0
51 300.0 250.0
100 100
350 100
350 350
100 350
100 100
900
700
700
500
300
100
-100 100 30
-100
-100
300 500 700
700 900
1100
1400
1200
1000
800
45
Pu (kN)
52
60
75
600 50
Column D
400
200
0
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180
Mux (kN.m)
1400
1200
1000
800
75
Pu (kN)
45
45
75
600 50
Column D
400
200
0
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1
Muy (kN.m)
Pu-Mux INTERACTION TABLE
b(mm)= 250
D(mm)= 250
fck(Mpa)= 20
D(mm)= 250
b(mm)= 250
fck(Mpa)= 20
COLUMN DESIGN
b(mm)= 500 MuxL D(mm)= 500 Muyl column no.
D(mm)= 500 cover b(mm)= 500 SAMPLE
fck(Mpa)= 25 55 fck(Mpa)= 25 PROBLEM 2
row,no. Asi, mm2 di, mm row,no. Asi, mm2 di, mm
1 1923 55.0 1 2453 55.0 25 20 20 20 25
2 981 152.5 2 628 152.5 25 25
6790
3 981 250.0 3 628 250.0 25 25
4 981 347.5 4 628 347.5 25 2.72 % 25
5 1923 445.0 5 2453 445.0 25 20 20 20 25
Asc / % 6790 2.72 Asc / % 6790 2.72
di= from max. comp. Fibre di= from max. comp. Fibre
k ( xu/D >1) Pu Mu k ( xu/D >1) Pu Mu
5.00 4990 8 k>=1 5.00 4989 9
2.50 4928 24 2.50 4924 27
1.50 4677 76 1.50 4646 87
1.20 4385 131 1.20 4332 148
1.10 4206 164 1.10 4142 184
1.00 3942 211 1.00 3863 236
0.900 3511 275 k<1 0.900 3421 304
0.850 3275 306 0.850 3179 338
0.800 3010 336 0.800 2913 373
0.775 2870 352 0.775 2772 390
0.750 2725 367 0.750 2626 408
0.725 2574 383 0.725 2474 426
0.700 2416 399 0.700 2314 445
0.675 2250 416 0.675 2148 464
0.650 2074 433 0.650 1971 484
0.625 1897 449 0.625 1795 502
0.600 1747 459 0.600 1657 513
0.575 1599 466 0.575 1524 521
0.550 1452 472 0.550 1398 526
0.500 1128 480 0.500 1128 534
0.300 -71 422 0.300 168 482
Puz, Axial , code 4825 Puz, Axial , code 4825
Pu, Axial , code 4320 Pu, Axial , code 4320
LOAD COMB 1 2 3 4 5 6
Pu 3500 3500 4000 4000 4320 4320
Mux 246 196 180 145 129 104
Muy 123 196 90 145 65 104
Muxl : Col. D 276.21 276.21 200.99 200.99 143.18 143.18
Muyl : Col. I 292.11 292.11 210.30 210.30 150.78 150.78
The design of rectangular RCC column for axial load and uniaxial bending is carried out using Pu-Mu Interaction Diagrams using SP 16. For axial com
2. Design of Columns using 'SP 16' :
In SP 16, Pu-Mu interaction charts are presented for steel grade Fe 250, Fe 415 and Fe500 for
d’/D = 0.05, 0.1, 0.15 and 0.2 . The reinforcement arrangement is idealized as :
1. Reinforcement on two opposite faces : Chart No. 27 to 38
2. Reinforcement on all four faces equally distributed : Chart No. 39 to 50.
Limitations of 'SP 16' :
1. The charts for case 1 can be used for uniaxial bending only. However small bending Moment in the other direction may be, There is no w
2. When the charts are used for Mux (BM @ Major axis) for case 1, the reinforcement will be on the smaller (width- b) faces. These charts
3. It is evident that larger diameter bars on the highly stressed face makes efficient use of reinforcement, even larger diameter bars in corne
4. There would be confusion in arranging the reinforcement as equally distributed for rectangular section with large D/b ratio.
5. When the analysis and design is carried out using professional software, the intricacy of Column design is such that a designer would be
An effort is made to develop a spreadsheet for design of RCC columns to over come the above mentioned limitations.
3. COLUMN DESIGN SPREADSHEET:
The formulation adopted is for Limit State of Collapse as per IS 456. The Pu-Mu has been calculated considering concrete as well as each in
Concrete Grade M20, Steel Grade Fe 415 is considered.
The column cross section accommodates up to maximum three internal equally spaced reinforcement bars on each face apart from the fou
Give Input Data in white space, with red font. The last row will indicate whether the reinf. provided is adequate or otherwise modify grade
In case percentage of steel < 0.8 % and > 4 %, the user will be warranted to REVISE REINF.
* The Worksheet 'Mux' shows data, steps and output calculation points for Interaction diagram Pu-Mux diagram which is interpolated fo
* The Worksheet 'Muy' shows data, steps and output calculation points for Interaction diagram Pu-Muy diagram which is interpolated fo
* The worksheet 'Sample Problem' shows the design output for understanding the problem.
6. DISCLAIMER
* TO BE USED BY QUALIFIED STRUCTURAL ENGINEER FOR DESIGN AS PER OF IS - 456. CHECK BEFORE USE.
* NO LIABILITY OF DEVELOPER OF ANY TYPE UNTILL A LICENCE AGREEMENT IS SIGNED BETWEEN USER AND
DEVELOPER, AND THAT THE USER IS FORMALLY TRAINED FOR USE OF THIS SPREAD SHEET, INCL. ITS ADVANTAGES
AND ITS LIMITATIONS.
may be, There is no way to design a column for Biaxial Bending for this arrangement of reinforcement.
) faces. These charts do not accommodate reinf. to be provided on larger (Depth-D) faces from detailing aspects. If a Column with D = 900mm, minimum fo
ameter bars in corner are used with advantage for biaxial bending, it can not be accommodated by use of SP16.
a designer would be confident only if he checks the design by his own design tools for different cases. The column design is carried for various load combina
ce apart from the four corner bars. No. of bars on opposite faces are same, i.e. on any face no. of bars would be 2 to 5. At a time six load combinations are in
with D = 900mm, minimum four bars are required on each D-face, the charts can not account for these internal bars which may be of smaller diameter.
ied for various load combinations at junction with beam at top and bottom and at @ mid height section. More over most of the software normally use the in
six load combinations are included but process can be repeated for any numbers in the same sheet.
i.e. (Mux / Muxl) a + (Muy / Muyl) a < 1.
of smaller diameter.
tware normally use the internal forces at the nodes instead of the beam face.