Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Model of Retailing
Asymptotic
Significance (2-
Value df sided)
a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is
9.54.
Interpretation
With respect to model of retailing, As shown in above table no. 54, the significance
level for chi-square test is more than 0.05 level of significance. So, Null Hypothesis is
accepted.
Gender Wise Chi Square Test
Q.14 Which Model of retailing do you prefer for apparel shopping?
Model of Retailing
In Store Online Other Total
Gender Male 231 349 29 609
Female 206 302 33 541
Total 437 651 62 1150
Table no: 56 Model of Retailing Chi-Square Tests Gender Wise
Asymptotic
Significance (2
Value df sided)
a
Pearson Chi-Square 1.064 2 .587
Likelihood Ratio 1.062 2 .588
Linear-by-Linear Association .124 1 .725
N of Valid Cases 1150
a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is
29.17.
Interpretation
With respect to model of retailing, As shown in above table no. 56, the significance
level for chi-square test is more than 0.05 level of significance. So, Null Hypothesis is
accepted.
Occupation Wise Chi Square Test
Q.14 Which Model of retailing do you prefer for apparel shopping?
H0: The preference towards for apparel shopping model of retailing is not dependent
on occupation.
H1: The preference towards for apparel shopping model of retailing is dependent on
occupation.
Crosstab
Table no: 57 Model of Retailing Crosstab Tests Occupation Wise
Model of Retailing
In Store Online Other Total
Occupation Student 163 236 21 420
a. 1 cells (6.7%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .81.
Interpretation
With respect to model of retailing, As shown in above table no. 58, the significance
level for chi-square test is more than 0.05 level of significance. So, Null Hypothesis is
accepted.
Monthly Income Wise Chi Square Test
Q.14 Which Model of retailing do you prefer for apparel shopping?
H0: The preference towards for apparel shopping model of retailing is not dependent
on Monthly Income.
H1: The preference towards for apparel shopping model of retailing is dependent on
Monthly Income.
Table no: 59 Model of Retailing Crosstab
Model of Retailing
In Store Online Other Total
Monthly Income Less than 10000 64 111 8 183
a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is
9.87.
Interpretation
With respect to model of retailing, As shown in above table no. 60, the significance
level for chi-square test is more than 0.05 level of significance. So, Null Hypothesis is
accepted.
Age Wise Chi Square Test
Q.15 which retail format according to you saves more time and effort in apparel
shopping?
H0: The perception that online retail format saves time and efforts in apparel
shopping are not dependent on age.
H1: The perception that online retail format saves time and efforts in apparel
shopping are not dependent on age.
Crosstab
Asymptotic
Significance (2-
Value Df sided)
a
Pearson Chi-Square .264 2 .876
Likelihood Ratio .264 2 .876
Linear-by-Linear Association .261 1 .609
N of Valid Cases 1150
a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is
82.81.
Interpretation
With respect to which retail format saves more time and effort, as shown in above
table no. 62, the significance level for chi-square test is more than 0.05 level of
significance. So, Null Hypothesis is accepted.
Gender Wise Chi Square Test
Q.15 which retail format according to you saves more time and effort in apparel
shopping?
H0: The perception that online retail format saves time and efforts in apparel
shopping are not dependent on gender.
H1: The perception that online retail format saves time and efforts in apparel
shopping are not dependent on gender.
Crosstab
Table no: 63 Retail format Crosstab Tests Age Wise
Which Retail format Saves More time and
Effort time and Effort in Apparel Shopping
Asymptotic
Significance Exact Sig. Exact Sig.
Interpretation
With respect to which retail format saves more time and effort, as shown in above
table no. 64, the significance level for chi-square test is more than 0.05 level of
significance. So, Null Hypothesis is accepted.
Occupation Wise Chi Square Test
Q.15 which retail format according to you saves more time and effort in apparel
shopping?
H0: The perception that online retail format saves time and efforts in apparel
shopping are not dependent on occupation.
H1: The perception that online retail format saves time and efforts in apparel
shopping are not dependent on occupation.
Crosstab
Table no: 65 Retail format Crosstab Tests Occupation Wise
Asymptotic
Significance (2-
Value df sided)
a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is
7.02.
Interpretation
With respect to which retail format saves more time and effort, As shown in above
table no. 66, the significance level for chi-square test is more than 0.05 level of
significance. So, Null Hypothesis is accepted.
Monthly Income Wise Chi Square Test
Q.15 which retail format according to you saves more time and effort in apparel
shopping?
H0: The perception that online retail format saves time and efforts in apparel
shopping are not dependent on monthly income.
H1: The perception that online retail format saves time and efforts in apparel
shopping are not dependent on monthly income.
Crosstab
Table no: 67 Retail format Crosstab Tests Monthly Income Wise
Asymptotic
Significance (2
Value df sided)
a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is
85.61.
Interpretation
With respect to which retail format saves more time and effort, as shown in above
table no. 68, the significance level for chi-square test is more than 0.05 level of
significance. So, Null Hypothesis is accepted.
Asymptotic
Significance (2-
Value df sided)
a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is
71.42.
Interpretation
With respect to which retail format provides better deals, as shown in above table no.
70, the significance level for chi-square test is more than 0.05 level of significance.
So, Null Hypothesis is accepted.
Gender Wise Chi Square Test
Q.16 which retail format provides you with Better deals (discount)?
H0: The perception that online retail format provides better deal for online shopping
is not dependent on gender.
H1: The perception that online retail format provides better deal for online shopping
is dependent on gender.
Crosstab
Table no: 71 Retail format Crosstab Tests Gender Wise
Which Retail format Povides you with
Better Deals ?
a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 218.28.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Interpretation
With respect to which retail format provides better deals, as shown in above table no.
72, the significance level for chi-square test is more than 0.05 level of significance.
So, Null Hypothesis is accepted.
.
Occupation Wise Chi Square Test
Q.16 which retail format provides you with Better deals (discount)?
H0: The perception that online retail format provides better deal for online shopping
is not dependent on occupation.
H1: The perception that online retail format provides better deal for online shopping
is dependent on occupation.
Crosstab
Table no: 73 Retail format Crosstab Tests Occupation Wise
a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is
6.05.
Interpretation
With respect to which retail format provides better deals, as shown in above table no.
74, the significance level for chi-square test is more than 0.05 level of significance.
So, Null Hypothesis is accepted.
Monthly Income Wise Chi Square Test
Q.16 which retail format provides you with Better deals (discount)?
H0: The perception that online retail format provides better deal for online shopping
is not dependent on monthly income.
H1: The perception that online retail format provides better deal for online shopping
is dependent on monthly income.
Crosstab
Table no: 75 Retail format Crosstab Tests Monthly Income Wise
Which Retail format Provides you with
Better Deals?
a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is
73.84.
Interpretation
With respect to which retail format provides better deals, As shown in above table no.
76, the significance level for chi-square test is more than 0.05 level of significance.
So, Null Hypothesis is accepted.
Table no: 78 Independent Samples Test Prefer Online Shopping Gender Wise
Levene's
Test for
Equality of
Variances t-test for Equality of Means
95%
Confidence
Sig. Interval of the
(2- Mean Std. Error Difference
Convenience/Tim Equal
e Saving variance .59
.289 -.195 1148 .846 -.0137 .0703 -.1515 .1242
s 1
assumed
Equal
variance 1126.74
-.195 .846 -.0137 .0703 -.1517 .1243
s not 3
assumed
Easy Products and Equal
Price comparison variance .62 2.44
.233 1148 .015 .1730 .0707 .0343 .3116
s 9 8
assumed
Equal
variance 2.44 1124.77
.015 .1730 .0708 .0341 .3118
s not 4 1
assumed
Choice of Product Equal
Customization variance .90
.013 .306 1148 .760 .0223 .0728 -.1206 .1651
s 9
assumed
Equal
variance 1132.98
.306 .760 .0223 .0728 -.1205 .1651
s not 9
assumed
Offers / Discounts Equal
/ Schemes variance .51
.435 -.275 1148 .783 -.0194 .0707 -.1581 .1192
s 0
assumed
Equal
variance 1123.63
-.275 .784 -.0194 .0708 -.1584 .1195
s not 3
assumed
Product Variety Equal
variance 5.77 .01 1.28
1148 .201 .1101 .0859 -.0586 .2787
s 0 6 1
assumed
Equal
variance 1.27 1118.77
.202 .1101 .0862 -.0590 .2791
s not 7 1
assumed
Std.
N Mean Deviation Std. Error
Convenience/Time Saving 18 – 30 498 3.570 1.1507 .0516
31 – 45 475 3.499 1.2365 .0567
45 & above 177 3.672 1.1604 .0872
Total 1150 3.557 1.1888 .0351
Easy Products and Price 18 – 30 498 3.468 1.1986 .0537
comparison 31 – 45 475 3.575 1.2031 .0552
45 & above 177 3.571 1.1855 .0891
Total 1150 3.528 1.1986 .0353
Choice of Product 18 – 30 498 3.530 1.2186 .0546
Customization 31 – 45 475 3.429 1.2599 .0578
45 & above 177 3.531 1.1920 .0896
Total 1150 3.489 1.2318 .0363
Offers / Discounts / Schemes 18 – 30 498 3.524 1.2021 .0539
31 – 45 475 3.556 1.1865 .0544
45 & above 177 3.678 1.2028 .0904
Total 1150 3.561 1.1959 .0353
Product Variety 18 – 30 498 3.347 1.4693 .0658
31 – 45 475 3.297 1.4431 .0662
45 & above 177 3.226 1.4518 .1091
Total 1150 3.308 1.4552 .0429
Payment Mode 18 – 30 498 3.462 1.1950 .0536
31 – 45 475 3.442 1.1667 .0535
45 & above 177 3.384 1.2010 .0903
Total 1150 3.442 1.1836 .0349
Loyalty Programs 18 – 30 498 3.456 1.2492 .0560
31 – 45 475 3.514 1.2467 .0572
45 & above 177 3.475 1.2251 .0921
Total 1150 3.483 1.2437 .0367
Warranty / Guarantee 18 – 30 498 3.287 1.2782 .0573
31 – 45 475 3.457 1.2238 .0562
45 & above 177 3.282 1.2474 .0938
Total 1150 3.357 1.2530 .0369
Availability of personalized 18 – 30 498 2.392 1.2108 .0543
services 31 – 45 475 2.423 1.2169 .0558
45 & above 177 2.593 1.2808 .0963
Total 1150 2.436 1.2252 .0361
Easy to return and refund 18 – 30 498 2.888 1.4561 .0652
31 – 45 475 3.000 1.4698 .0674
45 & above 177 2.944 1.3302 .1000
Total 1150 2.943 1.4429 .0425
After Sales &Sevices 18 – 30 498 2.367 1.2299 .0551
31 – 45 475 2.354 1.2035 .0552
45 & above 177 2.407 1.1840 .0890
Total 1150 2.368 1.2111 .0357
Sum of
Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
Convenience/Time Between Groups 4.042 2 2.021 1.431 .239
Saving Within Groups 1619.784 1147 1.412
Easy to return and refund Between Groups 3.074 2 1.537 .738 .478
Within Groups 2389.138 1147 2.083
After Sales & Services Between Groups .364 2 .182 .124 .884
Within Groups 1685.046 1147 1.469
Interpretation
With respect to Convenience / Time Saving factor, as shown in above table
no. 78 the significance level for anova test is more than 0.05 level of
significance. So, Null Hypothesis is accepted.
With respect to Easy products and price comparison factor, As shown in above
table no. 78, the significance level for anova test is more than 0.05 level of
significance. So, Null Hypothesis is accepted.
With respect to Choice of Products customization factor, As shown in above
table no. 78, the significance level for anova test is more than 0.05 level of
significance. So, Null Hypothesis is accepted.
With respect to Offers/discounts/schemes factor, As shown in above table no.
78, the significance level for anova test is more than 0.05 level of significance.
So, Null Hypothesis is accepted.
With respect to Product Variety factor, As shown in above table no. 78, the
significance level for anova test is more than 0.05 level of significance. So,
Null Hypothesis is accepted.
With respect to Payment Mode factor, As shown in above table no. 78, the
significance level for anova test is more than 0.05 level of significance. So,
Null Hypothesis is accepted.
With respect to Loyalty Programs factor, As shown in above table no, the
significance level for anova test is more than 0.05 level of significance. So,
Null Hypothesis is accepted.
With respect to Warranty / Guarantee factor, As shown in above table no. 78,
the significance level for anova test is more than 0.05 level of significance. So,
Null Hypothesis is accepted.
With respect to Availability of personalized services factor, As shown in
above table no. 78, the significance level for anova test is more than 0.05 level
of significance. So, Null Hypothesis is accepted.
With respect to Easy to return and refund factor, As shown in above table no.
78, the significance level for anova test is more than 0.05 level of significance.
So, Null Hypothesis is accepted.
After Sales & Services Between Groups 2.018 4 .504 .343 .849
Within Groups 1683.392 1145 1.470
Interpretation
With respect to Convenience / Time Saving factor, as shown in above table
no. 78 the significance level for anova test is more than 0.05 level of
significance. So, Null Hypothesis is accepted.
With respect to Easy products and price comparison factor, As shown in above
table no. 78, the significance level for anova test is more than 0.05 level of
significance. So, Null Hypothesis is accepted.
With respect to Choice of Products customization factor, As shown in above
table no. 78, the significance level for anova test is more than 0.05 level of
significance. So, Null Hypothesis is accepted.
With respect to Offers/discounts/schemes factor, As shown in above table no.
78, the significance level for anova test is more than 0.05 level of significance.
So, Null Hypothesis is accepted.
With respect to Product Variety factor, As shown in above table no. 78, the
significance level for anova test is less than 0.05 level of significance. So, Null
Hypothesis is rejected.
With respect to Payment Mode factor, As shown in above table no. 78, the
significance level for anova test is more than 0.05 level of significance. So,
Null Hypothesis is accepted.
With respect to Loyalty Programs factor, As shown in above table no, the
significance level for anova test is more than 0.05 level of significance. So,
Null Hypothesis is accepted.
With respect to Warranty / Guarantee factor, As shown in above table no. 78,
the significance level for anova test is more than 0.05 level of significance. So,
Null Hypothesis is accepted.
With respect to Availability of personalized services factor, As shown in
above table no. 78, the significance level for anova test is more than 0.05 level
of significance. So, Null Hypothesis is accepted.
With respect to Easy to return and refund factor, As shown in above table no.
78, the significance level for anova test is more than 0.05 level of significance.
So, Null Hypothesis is accepted.
Monthly Income Wise Anova
Q.17 You Prefer online shopping as compare to offline shopping due to the following
reasons.
H0: There is no significant variation in perception towards convenience / Time Saving
among different Monthly Income wise.
H1: There is significant variation in perception towards convenience / Time Saving
among different Monthly Income wise.
H0: There is no significant variation in perception towards Easy products and price
comparison among different Monthly Income wise.
H1: There is significant variation in perception towards Easy products and price
comparison among different Monthly Income wise.
H0: There is no significant variation in perception towards Choice of product
customization among different Monthly Income wise.
H1: There is significant variation in perception towards Choice of product
customization among different Monthly Income wise.
H0: There is no significant variation in perception towards Offers/discounts/schemes
among different Monthly Income wise.
H1: There is significant variation in perception towards Offers/discounts/schemes
among different Monthly Income wise.
H0: There is no significant variation in perception towards product variety among
different Monthly Income wise.
H1: There is significant variation in perception towards product variety among
different Monthly Income wise.
H0: There is no significant variation in perception towards payment mode among
different Monthly Income wise.
H1: There is significant variation in perception towards payment mode among
different Monthly Income wise.
H0: There is no significant variation in perception towards Loyalty Programs among
different Monthly Income wise.
H1: There is significant variation in perception towards Loyalty Programs among
different Monthly Income wise.
H0: There is no significant variation in perception towards Warranty / Guarantee
among different Monthly Income wise.
H1: There is significant variation in perception towards Warranty / Guarantee among
different Monthly Income wise.
H0: There is no significant variation in perception towards Availability of
personalized services among different Monthly Income wise.
H1: There is significant variation in perception towards Availability of personalized
services among different Monthly Income wise.
H0: There is no significant variation in perception towards easy to return and refund
among different Monthly Income wise.
H1: There is significant variation in perception towards easy to return and refund
among different Monthly Income wise.
Table no: 83 Descriptives Prefer Online Shopping Monthly Income Wise
Interpretation
With respect to Convenience / Time Saving factor, as shown in above table
no. 78 the significance level for anova test is more than 0.05 level of
significance. So, Null Hypothesis is accepted.
With respect to Easy products and price comparison factor, As shown in above
table no. 78, the significance level for anova test is more than 0.05 level of
significance. So, Null Hypothesis is accepted.
With respect to Choice of Products customization factor, As shown in above
table no. 78, the significance level for anova test is more than 0.05 level of
significance. So, Null Hypothesis is accepted.
With respect to Offers/discounts/schemes factor, As shown in above table no.
78, the significance level for anova test is less than 0.05 level of significance.
So, Null Hypothesis is rejected.
With respect to Product Variety factor, As shown in above table no. 78, the
significance level for anova test is more than 0.05 level of significance. So,
Null Hypothesis is accepted.
With respect to Payment Mode factor, As shown in above table no. 78, the
significance level for anova test is more than 0.05 level of significance. So,
Null Hypothesis is accepted.
With respect to Loyalty Programs factor, As shown in above table no, the
significance level for anova test is more than 0.05 level of significance. So,
Null Hypothesis is accepted.
With respect to Warranty / Guarantee factor, As shown in above table no. 78,
the significance level for anova test is more than 0.05 level of significance. So,
Null Hypothesis is accepted.
With respect to Availability of personalized services factor, As shown in
above table no. 78, the significance level for anova test is more than 0.05 level
of significance. So, Null Hypothesis is accepted.
With respect to Easy to return and refund factor, As shown in above table no.
78, the significance level for anova test is more than 0.05 level of significance.
So, Null Hypothesis is accepted.
Gender Wise t test
Q.18 Rate the below mention factors on the basis of their importance while shopping
apparel’s online (on a scale of 1-5, 1 being the minimum and 5 being the maximum)
H0: There is no significant difference in perception towards fraud among gender.
H1: There is significant difference in perception towards fraud among gender.
H0: There is no significant difference in perception towards Legitimacy of Website
among gender.
H1: There is significant difference in perception towards Legitimacy of Website
among gender.
H0: There is no significant difference in perception towards Timely Delivery of
Goods among gender.
H1: There is significant difference in perception towards Timely Delivery of Goods
among gender.
H0: There is no significant difference in perception towards Security of Payments
among gender.
H1: There is significant difference in perception towards Security of Payments among
gender.
H0: There is no significant difference in perception towards Ease of Payments among
gender.
H1: There is significant difference in perception towards Ease of Payments among
gender.
Table no: 85 Group Statistics Importance While Shopping Apparel’s Online Gender Wise
Interpretation
With respect to Fraud factor, as shown in above table no. 86, the significance
level for t test is more than 0.05 level of significance. So, Null Hypothesis is
accepted.
With respect to Legitimacy of Website factor, as shown in above table no. 86,
the significance level for t test is more than 0.05 level of significance. So, Null
Hypothesis is accepted.
With respect to Timely Delivery of Goods factor, as shown in above table no.
86, the significance level for t test is more than 0.05 level of significance. So,
Null Hypothesis is accepted.
With respect to Security of Payments factor, As shown in above table no. 86,
the significance level for t test is less than 0.05 level of significance. So, Null
Hypothesis is rejected.
With respect to Ease of Payments factor, as shown in above table no. 86, the
significance level for t test is more than 0.05 level of significance. So, Null
Hypothesis is accepted.
Table no: 88Anova Test Importance While Shopping Apparel’s Online Age Wise
A Study on Online Buying Behaviour in Fashion and Apparel Industry Page 100
Interpretation
With respect to Fraud factor, as shown in above table no. 88, the significance
level for anova test is more than 0.05 level of significance. So, Null
Hypothesis is accepted.
With respect to Legitimacy of Website factor, as shown in above table no. 88,
the significance level for anova test is more than 0.05 level of significance. So,
Null Hypothesis is accepted.
With respect to Timely Delivery of Goods factor, as shown in above table no.
88, the significance level for anova test is more than 0.05 level of significance.
So, Null Hypothesis is accepted.
With respect to Security of Payments factor, As shown in above table no. 88,
the significance level for anova test is more than 0.05 level of significance. So,
Null Hypothesis is accepted.
With respect to Ease of Payments factor, as shown in above table no. 88, the
significance level for anova test is more than 0.05 level of significance. So,
Null Hypothesis is accepted.
Occupation Wise Anova
Q.18 Rate the below mention factors on the basis of their importance while shopping
apparel’s online (on a scale of 1-5, 1 being the minimum and 5 being the maximum).
H0: There is no significant variation in perception towards fraud among occupation.
H1: There is significant variation in perception towards fraud among occupation.
H0: There is no significant variation in perception towards Legitimacy of Website
among occupation.
H1: There is significant variation in perception towards Legitimacy of Website among
occupation.
H0: There is no significant variation in perception towards Timely Delivery of Goods
among occupation.
H1: There is significant variation in perception towards Timely Delivery of Goods
among occupation.
H0: There is no significant variation in perception towards Security of Payments
among occupation.
H1: There is significant variation in perception towards Security of Payments among
occupation.
H0: There is no significant variation in perception towards Ease of Payments among
occupation.
H1: There is significant variation in perception towards Ease of Payments among
occupation.
Table no: 89Descriptives Importance While Shopping Apparel’s Online Occupation Wise
Interpretation
With respect to Fraud factor, as shown in above table no. 90, the significance
level for anova test is more than 0.05 level of significance. So, Null
Hypothesis is accepted.
With respect to Legitimacy of Website factor, as shown in above table no. 90,
the significance level for anova test is more than 0.05 level of significance. So,
Null Hypothesis is accepted.
With respect to Timely Delivery of Goods factor, as shown in above table no.
90, the significance level for anova test is more than 0.05 level of significance.
So, Null Hypothesis is accepted.
With respect to Security of Payments factor, As shown in above table no. 90,
the significance level for anova test is more than 0.05 level of significance. So,
Null Hypothesis is accepted.
With respect to Ease of Payments factor, as shown in above table no. 90, the
significance level for anova test is more than 0.05 level of significance. So,
Null Hypothesis is accepted.
Monthly Income Wise Anova
Q.18 Rate the below mention factors on the basis of their importance while shopping
apparel’s online (on a scale of 1-5, 1 being the minimum and 5 being the maximum).
H0: There is no significant variation in perception towards fraud among Monthly
Income.
H1: There is significant variation in perception towards fraud among Monthly
Income.
H0: There is no significant variation in perception towards Legitimacy of Website
among Monthly Income.
H1: There is significant variation in perception towards Legitimacy of Website among
Monthly Income.
H0: There is no significant variation in perception towards Timely Delivery of Goods
among Monthly Income.
H1: There is significant variation in perception towards Timely Delivery of Goods
among Monthly Income.
H0: There is no significant variation in perception towards Security of Payments
among Monthly Income.
H1: There is significant variation in perception towards Security of Payments among
Monthly Income.
H0: There is no significant variation in perception towards Ease of Payments among
Monthly Income.
H1: There is significant variation in perception towards Ease of Payments among age
Monthly Income.
Table no: 91Descriptives Importance While Shopping Apparel’s Online Monthly Income Wise
Table no: 92Anova Test Importance While Shopping Apparel’s Online Monthly Income Wise
Interpretation
With respect to Fraud factor, as shown in above table no. 92, the significance
level for anova test is more than 0.05 level of significance. So, Null
Hypothesis is accepted.
With respect to Legitimacy of Website factor, as shown in above table no. 92,
the significance level for anova test is more than 0.05 level of significance. So,
Null Hypothesis is accepted.
With respect to Timely Delivery of Goods factor, as shown in above table no.
92, the significance level for anova test is more than 0.05 level of significance.
So, Null Hypothesis is accepted.
With respect to Security of Payments factor, As shown in above table no. 92,
the significance level for anova test is more than 0.05 level of significance. So,
Null Hypothesis is accepted.
With respect to Ease of Payments factor, as shown in above table no. 92, the
significance level for anova test is more than 0.05 level of significance. So,
Null Hypothesis is accepted.
Table no: 93 Group Statistics feel uncertain about receiving the same products Gender Wise
Interpretation
With respect to uncertain about receiving the same products, as shown in above table
no. 94, the significance level for t test is more than 0.05. So, Null Hypothesis is
accepted.
Table no: 96Anova Test feel uncertain about receiving the same products Age Wise
Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
Uncertain about Between Groups 9.799 2 4.900 2.843 .059
receiving the Within Groups 1976.918 1147 1.724
product
Total 1986.717 1149
Interpretation
With respect to uncertain about receiving the same products, as shown in above table
no. 96, the significance level for anova test is more than 0.05 level of significance. So,
Null Hypothesis is accepted.
Occupation Wise Anova
Q.19 Do you feel uncertain about receiving the same products as the one ordered
online? If yes, how much uncertainty?
H0: There is no significant variation towards uncertain about receiving the same
products as the ordered online among occupation.
H1: There is significant variation towards uncertain about receiving the same products
as the ordered online among occupation.
Table no: 97Descriptives feel uncertain about receiving the same products Occupation
Wise
Table no: 98Anova Test feel uncertain about receiving the same products Occupation Wise
Interpretation
With respect to uncertain about receiving the same products, As shown in above table
no. 98, the significance level for anova test is more than 0.05 level of significance. So,
Null Hypothesis is accepted.
Monthly Income Wise Anova
Q.19 Do you feel uncertain about receiving the same products as the one ordered
online? If yes, how much uncertainty?
H0: There is no significant variation towards uncertain about receiving the same
products as the ordered online among Monthly Income.
H1: There is significant variation towards uncertain about receiving the same products
as the ordered online among Monthly Income.
Table no: 99Descriptives feel uncertain about receiving the same products Monthly Income Wise
Table no: 100Anova Test feel uncertain about receiving the same products Monthly Income Wise
Interpretation
With respect to uncertain about receiving the same products, As shown in above table
no. 100, the significance level for anova test is more than 0.05 level of significance.
So, Null Hypothesis is accepted.
Table no: 101 Group Statistics factor influence you to purchase online Gender Wise
Table no: 102 Independent Samples Test factor influence you to purchase online Gender Wise
A Study on Online Buying Behaviour in Fashion and Apparel Industry Page 110
Equal
variances 1124.
-2.158 .031 -.1527 .0707 -.2915 -.0139
not 615
assumed
Physical Equal
Examination of variances .098 .754 -.861 1148 .390 -.0607 .0705 -.1991 .0777
Product assumed
Equal
variances 1132.
-.861 .390 -.0607 .0705 -.1991 .0777
not 368
assumed
Interpretation
With respect to Immediate Possession of Products factor, as shown in above
table no. 102, the significance level for t test is more than 0.05 level of
significance. So, Null Hypothesis is accepted.
With respect to Easy Browsing for Products factor, as shown in above table
no. 102, the significance level for t test is more than 0.05 level of significance.
So, Null Hypothesis is accepted.
With respect to Physical Examination of Product factor, as shown in above
table no. 102, the significance level for t test is more than 0.05 level of
significance. So, Null Hypothesis is accepted.
Table no: 104Anova Test factor influence you to purchase online age wise
Sum of
Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
Interpretation
With respect to Immediate Possession of Products factor, as shown in above
table no. 104, the significance level for anova test is more than 0.05 level of
significance. So, Null Hypothesis is accepted.
With respect to Easy Browsing for Products factor, as shown in above table
no. 104, the significance level for anova test is more than 0.05 level of
significance. So, Null Hypothesis is accepted.
With respect to Physical Examination of Product factor, as shown in above
table no. 104, the significance level for anova test is more than 0.05 level of
significance. So, Null Hypothesis is accepted.
Occupation Wise Anova
Q.20 How much do the below mentioned factors influence you to purchase online?
H0: There is no significant variation in perception towards Immediate Possession of
Products among occupation.
H1: There is significant variation in perception towards Immediate Possession of
Products among occupation.
H0: There is no significant variation in perception towards Easy Browsing for
Products among occupation.
H1: There is significant variation in perception towards Easy Browsing for Products
among occupation.
H0: There is no significant variation in perception towards Physical Examination of
Product among occupation.
H1: There is significant variation in perception towards Physical Examination of
Product among occupation.
Table no: 105Descriptives factor influence you to purchase online occupation wise
Table no: 106Anova Test factor influence you to purchase online occupation wise
Sum of
Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
Immediate possession of Between Groups 3.111 4 .778 .525 .718
products Within Groups 1697.384 1145 1.482
Interpretation
With respect to Immediate Possession of Products factor, as shown in above
table no. 106, the significance level for anova test is more than 0.05 level of
significance. So, Null Hypothesis is accepted.
With respect to Easy Browsing for Products factor, as shown in above table
no. 106, the significance level for anova test is more than 0.05 level of
significance. So, Null Hypothesis is accepted.
With respect to Physical Examination of Product factor, as shown in above
table no. 106, the significance level for anova test is more than 0.05 level of
significance. So, Null Hypothesis is accepted.
Monthly Income Wise Anova
Q.20 How much do the below mentioned factors influence you to purchase online?
H0: There is no significant variation in perception towards Immediate Possession of
Products among Monthly Income.
H1: There is significant variation in perception towards Immediate Possession of
Products among Monthly Income.
H0: There is no significant variation in perception towards Easy Browsing for
Products among Monthly Income.
H1: There is significant variation in perception towards Easy Browsing for Products
among Monthly Income.
H0: There is no significant variation in perception towards Physical Examination of
Product among Monthly Income.
H1: There is significant variation in perception towards Physical Examination of
Product among Monthly Income.
Table no: 107Descriptives factor influence you to purchase online monthly income wise
Table no: 108Anova Test factor influence you to purchase online monthly income wise
Sum of
Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
Immediate possession of Between Groups 6.585 4 1.646 1.113 .349
products Within Groups 1693.909 1145 1.479
Interpretation
With respect to Immediate Possession of Products factor, as shown in above
table no. 108, the significance level for anova test is more than 0.05 level of
significance. So, Null Hypothesis is accepted.
With respect to Easy Browsing for Products factor, as shown in above table
no. 108, the significance level for anova test is more than 0.05 level of
significance. So, Null Hypothesis is accepted.
With respect to Physical Examination of Product factor, as shown in above
table no. 108, the significance level for anova test is more than 0.05 level of
significance. So, Null Hypothesis is accepted.
Table no: 110 Independent Samples Test prefer particular brand while shopping online Gender
Wise
Levene's Test
for Equality
of Variances t-test for Equality of Means
95%
Confidence
Sig. Interval of the
Brand Equal
Preference variances .409 .522 .348 1148 .728 .0279 .0802 -.1294 .1852
influenced assumed
by someone Equal
else variances .348 1134.136 .728 .0279 .0801 -.1293 .1851
not assumed
Interpretation
With respect to Prefer branded apparels than unbranded apparels factor, as
shown in above table no. 110, the significance level for t test is more than 0.05
level of significance. So, Null Hypothesis is accepted.
With respect to Prefer for a specific brand factor, as shown in above table no.
110, the significance level for t test is less than 0.05 level of significance. So,
Null Hypothesis is rejected.
With respect to Brand preference influenced by someone else factor, as shown
in above table no. 110, the significance level for t test is more than 0.05 level
of significance. So, Null Hypothesis is accepted.
Table no: 111Descriptives prefer particular brand while shopping online age wise
Table no: 112Anova prefer particular brand while shopping online age wise
Sum of
Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
Prefer Branded apparels Between Groups 1.039 2 .519 .333 .716
than unbranded apparels Within Groups 1786.234 1147 1.557
Prefer for a specific brand Between Groups 15.112 2 7.556 4.650 .010
Within Groups 1863.945 1147 1.625
Interpretation
With respect to Prefer branded apparels than unbranded apparels factor, as
shown in above table no. 112, the significance level for anova test is more than
0.05 level of significance. So, Null Hypothesis is accepted.
With respect to Prefer for a specific brand factor, as shown in above table no.
112, the significance level for anova test is less than 0.05 level of significance.
So, Null Hypothesis is rejected.
With respect to Brand preference influenced by someone else factor, as shown
in above table no. 112, the significance level for anova test is less than 0.05
level of significance. So, Null Hypothesis is rejected.
Occupation Wise Anova
Q.21 you prefer particular brand while shopping online for apparels as compared to
offline shopping.
H0: There is no significant variation in perception towards Prefer branded apparels
than unbranded apparels among occupation.
H1: There is significant variation in perception towards Prefer branded apparels than
unbranded apparels among occupation.
H0: There is no significant variation in perception towards prefer for a specific brand
among occupation.
H1: There is significant variation in perception towards prefer for a specific brand
among occupation.
H0: There is no significant variation in perception towards Brand preference
influenced by someone else among occupation.
H1: There is significant variation in perception towards Brand preference influenced
by someone else among occupation.
Table no: 113Descriptives prefer particular brand while shopping online occupation wise
A Study on Online Buying Behaviour in Fashion and Apparel Industry Page 120
Table no: 114Anova prefer particular brand while shopping online occupation wise
Sum of
Squares Df Mean Square F Sig.
Prefer Branded apparels Between Groups 2.594 4 .649 .416 .797
than unbranded apparels Within Groups 1784.679 1145 1.559
Prefer for a specific brand Between Groups 8.045 4 2.011 1.231 .296
Within Groups 1871.012 1145 1.634
Interpretation
With respect to Prefer branded apparels than unbranded apparels factor, as
shown in above table no. 114, the significance level for anova test is more than
0.05 level of significance. So, Null Hypothesis is accepted.
With respect to Prefer for a specific brand factor, as shown in above table no.
114, the significance level for anova test is more than 0.05 level of
significance. So, Null Hypothesis is accepted.
With respect to Brand preference influenced by someone else factor, as shown
in above table no. 114, the significance level for anova test is more than 0.05
level of significance. So, Null Hypothesis is accepted.
Monthly Income Wise Anova
Q.21 you prefer particular brand while shopping online for apparels as compared to
offline shopping.
H0: There is no significant variation in perception towards Prefer branded apparels
than unbranded apparels among monthly income.
H1: There is significant variation in perception towards Prefer branded apparels than
unbranded apparels among monthly income.
H0: There is no significant variation in perception towards prefer for a specific brand
among monthly income.
H1: There is significant variation in perception towards prefer for a specific brand
among monthly income.
H0: There is no significant variation in perception towards Brand preference
influenced by someone else among monthly income.
H1: There is significant variation in perception towards Brand preference influenced
by someone else among monthly income.
Table no: 115Descriptives prefer particular brand while shopping online monthly income wise
Table no: 116Anova prefer particular brand while shopping online monthly income wise
Sum of
Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
Prefer Branded apparels Between Groups 4.550 4 1.137 .731 .571
than unbranded apparels Within Groups 1782.723 1145 1.557
Prefer for a specific brand Between Groups 4.239 4 1.060 .647 .629
Within Groups 1874.818 1145 1.637
Interpretation
With respect to Prefer branded apparels than unbranded apparels factor, as
shown in above table no. 116, the significance level for anova test is more than
0.05 level of significance. So, Null Hypothesis is accepted.
With respect to Prefer for a specific brand factor, as shown in above table no.
116, the significance level for anova test is more than 0.05 level of
significance. So, Null Hypothesis is accepted.
With respect to Brand preference influenced by someone else factor, as shown
in above table no. 116, the significance level for anova test is more than 0.05
level of significance. So, Null Hypothesis is accepted.
Table no: 118 Independent Samples Test Effect of advertising while shopping online Gender
Wise
Levene's Test
for Equality of
Variances t-test for Equality of Means
95%
Confidence
Sig. Interval of the
(2- Mean Std. Error Difference
F Sig. t df tailed) Difference Difference Lower Upper
Brand Equal
Preference is variances .317 .573 .743 1148 .458 .0552 .0743 -.0905 .2009
affected by assumed
advertising Equal
of the brand variances not .744 1136.581 .457 .0552 .0742 -.0904 .2007
assumed
Endorsement Equal
by variances 4.408 .036 .110 1148 .912 .0081 .0735 -.1360 .1522
celebrities assumed
affect Equal
purchase variances not .111 1143.610 .912 .0081 .0732 -.1356 .1518
online assumed
Gimmicks Equal
-
and publicity variances .131 .717 1148 .397 -.0641 .0756 -.2125 .0843
.848
stunts affect assumed
my Equal
preference variances not -
1137.056 .396 -.0641 .0755 -.2123 .0841
for purchase assumed .849
online
Interpretation
With respect to brand preference is affected by the advertising of the brand
factor, as shown in above table no. 118, the significance level for t test is more
than 0.05 level of significance. So, Null Hypothesis is accepted.
With respect to Endorsement by celebrities affect purchase online factor, as
shown in above table no. 118, the significance level for t test is less than 0.05
level of significance. So, Null Hypothesis is rejected.
With respect to Gimmicks and publicity stunts affect mypreference for
purchase online factor, as shown in above table no. 118, the significance level
for t test is more than 0.05 level of significance. So, Null Hypothesis is
accepted.
Table no: 120Anova Effect of advertising while shopping online age wise
Sum of
Squares Df Mean Square F Sig.
Brand Preference is Between Groups 15.888 2 7.944 5.066 .006
affected by advertising of Within Groups 1798.704 1147 1.568
the brand
Total 1814.592 1149
Interpretation
With respect to brand preference is affected by the advertising of the brand
factor, as shown in above table no. 120, the significance level for anova test is
less than 0.05 level of significance. So, Null Hypothesis is rejected.
With respect to Endorsement by celebrities affect purchase online factor, as
shown in above table no. 120, the significance level for anova test is more than
0.05 level of significance. So, Null Hypothesis is accepted.
With respect to Gimmicks and publicity stunts affect mypreference for
purchase online factor, as shown in above table no. 120, the significance level
for anova test is more than 0.05 level of significance. So, Null Hypothesis is
accepted.
Occupation Wise Anova
Q.22 Effect of advertising while shopping online for apparels as compared to offline
shopping.
H0: There is no significant variation in perception towards brand preference is
affected by the advertising of the brand among occupation.
H1: There is significant variation in perception towards brand preference is affected
by the advertising of the brand among occupation.
H0: There is no significant variation in perception towards endorsement by celebrities
affect purchase online among occupation.
H1: There is significant variation in perception endorsement by celebrities affect
purchase online among occupation
H0: There is no significant variation in perception towards Gimmicks and publicity
stunts affect my preference for purchase online among occupation
H1: There is significant variation in perception towards Gimmicks and publicity
stunts affect my preference for purchase online among occupation
Table no: 121Descriptives Effect of advertising while shopping online occupation wise
Interpretation
With respect to brand preference is affected by the advertising of the brand
factor, as shown in above table no. 122, the significance level for anova test is
more than 0.05 level of significance. So, Null Hypothesis is accepted.
With respect to Endorsement by celebrities affect purchase online factor, as
shown in above table no. 122, the significance level for anova test is more than
0.05 level of significance. So, Null Hypothesis is accepted.
With respect to Gimmicks and publicity stunts affect mypreference for
purchase online factor, as shown in above table no. 122, the significance level
for anova test is more than 0.05 level of significance. So, Null Hypothesis is
accepted.
Monthly Income Wise Anova
Q.22 Effect of advertising while shopping online for apparels as compared to offline
shopping.
H0: There is no significant variation in perception towards brand preference is
affected by the advertising of the brand among monthly income.
H1: There is significant variation in perception towards brand preference is affected
by the advertising of the brand among monthly income.
H0: There is no significant variation in perception towards endorsement by celebrities
affect purchase online among monthly income.
H1: There is significant variation in perception endorsement by celebrities affect
purchase online among monthly income.
H0: There is no significant variation in perception towards Gimmicks and publicity
stunts affect my preference for purchase online among monthly income.
H1: There is significant variation in perception towards Gimmicks and publicity
stunts affect my preference for purchase online among monthly income.
Table no: 123Descriptives Effect of advertising while shopping online monthly income wise
Table no: 124Anova Effect of advertising while shopping online monthly income wise
Sum of
Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
Brand Preference is affected by Between Groups 10.215 4 2.554 1.621 .167
advertising of the brand Within Groups 1804.377 1145 1.576
Interpretation
With respect to brand preference is affected by the advertising of the brand
factor, as shown in above table no. 124, the significance level for anova test is
more than 0.05 level of significance. So, Null Hypothesis is accepted.
With respect to Endorsement by celebrities affect purchase online factor, as
shown in above table no. 124, the significance level for anova test is more than
0.05 level of significance. So, Null Hypothesis is accepted.
With respect to Gimmicks and publicity stunts affect mypreference for
purchase online factor, as shown in above table no. 124, the significance level
for anova test is more than 0.05 level of significance. So, Null Hypothesis is
accepted.
A Study on Online Buying Behaviour in Fashion and Apparel Industry Page 130
Table no: 125 Group Statistics Effect of Sales Promotion while shopping online Gender Wise
Table no: 126 Independent Samples Effect of Sales Promotion while shopping online Gender
Wise
Levene's Test
for Equality
of Variances t-test for Equality of Means
95%
Confidence
Sig. Interval of the
(2- Mean Std. Error Difference
F Sig. t df tailed) Difference Difference Lower Upper
Brand Equal
Preference is variances .064 .800 -.908 1148 .364 -.0690 .0759 -.2180 .0800
affected by assumed
the Equal
advertising variances -.908 1129.974 .364 -.0690 .0760 -.2180 .0801
of the brand not assumed
Endorsement Equal
by variances 5.459 .020 2.469 1148 .014 .1823 .0738 .0375 .3272
Celebrities assumed
Equal
variances 2.460 1110.578 .014 .1823 .0741 .0369 .3278
not assumed
Gimmicks Equal
and publicity variances .000 .987 -.764 1148 .445 -.0582 .0761 -.2075 .0912
stunts affect assumed
my Equal
preference variances
-.764 1131.875 .445 -.0582 .0761 -.2076 .0912
for purchase not assumed
online
Interpretation
With respect to brand preference is affected by the advertising of the brand
factor, as shown in above table no. 126, the significance level for t test is more
than 0.05 level of significance. So, Null Hypothesis is accepted.
With respect to Endorsement by celebrities affect purchase online factor, as
shown in above table no. 126, the significance level for t test is less than 0.05
level of significance. So, Null Hypothesis is rejected.
With respect to Gimmicks and publicity stunts affect my preference for
purchase online factor, as shown in above table no. 126, the significance level
for t test is more than 0.05 level of significance. So, Null Hypothesis is
accepted.
Table no: 127Descriptives Effect of Sales Promotion while shopping online age wise
Table no: 128Anova Effect of Sales Promotion while shopping online age wise
Sum of
Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
Brand Preference is Between Groups 2.081 2 1.040 .630 .533
affected by the Within Groups 1895.868 1147 1.653
advertising of the brand
Total 1897.949 1149
Interpretation
With respect to brand preference is affected by the advertising of the brand
factor, as shown in above table no. 128, the significance level for anova test is
more than 0.05 level of significance. So, Null Hypothesis is accepted.
With respect to Endorsement by celebrities affect purchase online factor, as
shown in above table no. 128, the significance level for anova test is more than
0.05 level of significance. So, Null Hypothesis is accepted.
With respect to Gimmicks and publicity stunts affect my preference for
purchase online factor, as shown in above table no. 128, the significance level
for anova test is more than 0.05 level of significance. So, Null Hypothesis is
accepted.
Occupation Wise Anova
Q.23 Effect of sales promotion while shopping online for apparels as compared to
offline shopping.
H0: There is no significant variation in perception towards brand preference is
affected by the advertising of the brand among occupation.
H1: There is significant variation in perception towards brand preference is affected
by the advertising of the brand among occupation.
H0: There is no significant variation in perception towards endorsement by celebrities
affect purchase online among occupation.
H1: There is significant variation in perception endorsement by celebrities affect
purchase online among occupation
H0: There is no significant variation in perception towards Gimmicks and publicity
stunts affect mypreference for purchase online among occupation
H1: There is significant variation in perception towards Gimmicks and publicity
stunts affect mypreference for purchase online among occupation
Table no: 129Descriptives Effect of Sales Promotion while shopping online occupation wise
Interpretation
With respect to brand preference is affected by the advertising of the brand
factor, as shown in above table no. 122, the significance level for anova test is
more than 0.05 level of significance. So, Null Hypothesis is accepted.
With respect to Endorsement by celebrities affect purchase online factor, as
shown in above table no. 122, the significance level for anova test is more than
0.05 level of significance. So, Null Hypothesis is accepted.
With respect to Gimmicks and publicity stunts affect mypreference for
purchase online factor, as shown in above table no. 122, the significance level
for anova test is more than 0.05 level of significance. So, Null Hypothesis is
accepted.
Monthly Income Wise Anova
Q.23 Effect of sales promotion while shopping online for apparels as compared to
offline shopping.
H0: There is no significant variation in perception towards brand preference is
affected by the advertising of the brand among monthly income.
H1: There is significant variation in perception towards brand preference is affected
by the advertising of the brand among monthly income.
H0: There is no significant variation in perception towards endorsement by celebrities
affect purchase online among monthly income.
H1: There is significant variation in perception endorsement by celebrities affect
purchase online among monthly income.
H0: There is no significant variation in perception towards Gimmicks and publicity
stunts affect mypreference for purchase online among monthly income.
H1: There is significant variation in perception towards Gimmicks and publicity
stunts affect mypreference for purchase online among monthly income.
Table no: 131Descriptives Effect of Sales Promotion while shopping online monthly income wise
Table no: 132Anova Effect of Sales Promotion while shopping online monthly income wise
Sum of
Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
Brand Preference is Between Groups 2.677 4 .669 .404 .806
affected by the Within Groups 1895.272 1145 1.655
advertising of the brand
Total 1897.949 1149
Interpretation
With respect to brand preference is affected by the advertising of the brand
factor, as shown in above table no. 132, the significance level for anova test is
more than 0.05 level of significance. So, Null Hypothesis is accepted.
With respect to Endorsement by celebrities affect purchase online factor, as
shown in above table no. 132, the significance level for anova test is more than
0.05 level of significance. So, Null Hypothesis is accepted.
With respect to Gimmicks and publicity stunts affect mypreference for
purchase online factor, as shown in above table no. 132, the significance level
for anova test is more than 0.05 level of significance. So, Null Hypothesis is
accepted.
Table no: 134 Independent Samples Effect of Price while shopping online Gender Wise
Levene's Test
for Equality
of Variances t-test for Equality of Means
95%
Confidence
Sig. Interval of the
(2- Mean Std. Error Difference
F Sig. t df tailed) Difference Difference Lower Upper
Value of Equal
-
Money variances 3.214 .073 1148 .296 -.0682 .0652 -.1962 .0598
1.045
effect assumed
shopping Equal -
online variances 1144.763 .294 -.0682 .0650 -.1957 .0593
1.049
not assumed
if price Equal
increase will variances 1.960 .162 -.455 1148 .649 -.0308 .0676 -.1635 .1019
affect assumed
buying Equal
online variances -.456 1143.101 .648 -.0308 .0674 -.1631 .1015
not assumed
If price Equal
decrease by variances .167 .683 .456 1148 .648 .0323 .0708 -.1067 .1713
competitor assumed
it will affect Equal
my variances .457 1137.266 .648 .0323 .0707 -.1065 .1711
preference not assumed
Interpretation
With respect to Value of Money effect shopping online factor, as shown in
above table no. 134, the significance level for t test is more than 0.05 level of
significance. So, Null Hypothesis is accepted.
With respect to If price increase will affect buying online factor, as shown in
above table no. 134, the significance level for t test is more than 0.05 level of
significance. So, Null Hypothesis is accepted.
With respect to If price decrease by competitor it will affect my preference
factor, as shown in above table no. 134, the significance level for t test is more
than 0.05 level of significance. So, Null Hypothesis is accepted.
Table no: 136Anova Effect of Price while shopping online age wise
Sum of
Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
Interpretation
With respect to Value of Money effect shopping online factor, as shown in
above table no. 136, the significance level for anova test is more than 0.05
level of significance. So, Null Hypothesis is accepted.
With respect to If price increase will affect buying online factor, as shown in
above table no. 136, the significance level for anova test is more than 0.05
level of significance. So, Null Hypothesis is accepted.
With respect to If price decrease by competitor it will affect my preference
factor, as shown in above table no. 136, the significance level for anova test is
less than 0.05 level of significance. So, Null Hypothesis is rejected.
Occupation Wise Anova
Q.24 Effect of Price while shopping online for apparels as compared to offline
shopping.
H0: There is no significant variation in perception towards value of money affect
shopping online among occupation.
A Study on Online Buying Behaviour in Fashion and Apparel Industry Page 140
H1: There is significant variation in perception towards value of money affect
shopping online among occupation.
H0: There is no significant variation in perception towards if price increase will affect
buying online among occupation.
H1: There is significant variation in perception towards if price increase will affect
buying online among occupation.
H0: There is no significant variation in perception towards if price decrease by
competitor it will affect my preference among occupation.
H1: There is significant variation in perception towards if price decrease by
competitor it will affect my preference among occupation.
Table no: 137Descriptives Effect of Price while shopping online occupation wise
Interpretation
With respect to Value of Money effect shopping online factor, as shown in
above table no. 138, the significance level for anova test is more than 0.05
level of significance. So, Null Hypothesis is accepted.
With respect to If price increase will affect buying online factor, as shown in
above table no. 138, the significance level for anova test is more than 0.05
level of significance. So, Null Hypothesis is accepted.
With respect to If price decrease by competitor it will affect my preference
factor, as shown in above table no. 138, the significance level for anova test is
more than 0.05 level of significance. So, Null Hypothesis is accepted.
Monthly Income Wise Anova
Q.24 Effect of Price while shopping online for apparels as compared to offline
shopping.
H0: There is no significant variation in perception towards value of money affect
shopping online among monthly income.
H1: There is significant variation in perception towards value of money affect
shopping online among monthly income.
H0: There is no significant variation in perception towards if price increase will affect
buying online among monthly income.
H1: There is significant variation in perception towards if price increase will affect
buying online among monthly income.
H0: There is no significant variation in perception towards if price decrease by
competitor it will affect my preference among monthly income.
H1: There is significant variation in perception towards if price decrease by
competitor it will affect my preference among monthly income.
Table no: 139Descriptives Effect of Price while shopping online Monthly Income wise
Table no: 140Anova Effect of Price while shopping online monthly Income wise
Sum of
Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
Interpretation
With respect to Value of Money effect shopping online factor, as shown in
above table no. 140, the significance level for anova test is more than 0.05
level of significance. So, Null Hypothesis is accepted.
With respect to If price increase will affect buying online factor, as shown in
above table no. 140, the significance level for anova test is more than 0.05
level of significance. So, Null Hypothesis is accepted.
With respect to If price decrease by competitor it will affect my preference
factor, as shown in above table no. 140, the significance level for anova test is
more than 0.05 level of significance. So, Null Hypothesis is accepted.