Feedback Infra Pvt. Ltd.

Design of Abutment

1.0 INTRODUCTION
Major Bridge Chainage
SN. CA Existing DESIGN
1 25+500 25+500
Abutment-A1 Abutment A-2
S.N Description
LHS LHS
1 Chainage 25+500 25500
2 FRL 64.700 64.7
3 Camber % 2.50 2.50
WC + Deck Slab + Girder
4 1.985 1.985
depth
5 Total Width 12 12
6 Bearing spacing 3.00 3.00
7 Total number of Bearing 4.00 4.00
8 Min bearing+Pedestal 0.35 0.35
9 Max bearing+Pedestal 0.575 0.575
10 Soffit Level 62.590 62.715 Minimum Required Soffit Level
11 Cap Top Level 62.240 62.37 62.487
12 Ground level 59.161 59.161
13 Scour Level 53.307 53.307
14 HFL 61.022 61.022
15 Depth Below Ground Level 0.500 0.500
16 Pile cap top level 58.661 58.661
17 Pile cap bottom level 56.861 56.861
18 Total pile length 25.00 25.00
19 Pile capacity 250 38

This note pertain to design of Abutment A1. Design of Abutment has been done for critical Abutment.

Item Stress Strength

Maximum Permissible stress in tension
300.00 N/mm2
Reinforcement fy = 500 N/mm2
Modulas of elasticity of steel
200000.00 N/mm2
Concrete (for Permissible stress for Rare Combination
Foudation and 16.80 N/mm2
Substructure) Permissible stress for Quasi Combination
fck = 35 N/mm2
M 35 12.60 N/mm2
Secant Modulas of elasticity Ec =
32000.00 N/mm2

ASOM PWRD AXOM MALA PROJECT

Feedback Infra Pvt. Ltd. Design of Abutment

3.0 General Details and Live Load Reaction Calculations

1. Input sheet
Design Levels
Skew Angle = 0.00 º No of Bearings = 4
Finished Road Level = 64.700 m Overall C/C span (Exp Gap to Exp Gap) = 25.00 m
Overall width of road = 12.000 m Clear carriageway = 11.00 m
Soffit Level = 62.590 m Depth below gl = 0.50 m
Abutment Cap Top Level = 62.240 m Foundation top level = 58.661 m
Pile cap top level = 58.661 m Pile cap depth = 1.80 m
HFL = 61.022 m Spacing of Pile = 3.6 m
Scour Level = 53.307 m Dia of Pile = 1.200 m
Ground level = 59.161 m No. of Pile = 8 Nos
Thickness of Abutment cap at st portion = 0.40 m Abutment Cap Bottom Level(Uniform Portion Ends) = 61.84 m
Thickness of abutment cap at Tapered portion = 0.60 m Abutment Cap Bottom Level(Tapered Portion Ends) = 61.24 m

Dimensions of Different Component

width of Abutment Cap = 12.00 m Width of Abutment cap = 1.620 m
width of Abutment = 12.00 m Thickness of Abutment at top = 0.600 m
width of foundation = 12.30 m Thickness of Abutment at bottom = 0.900 m
length of Pile cap = 5.10 m Expansion Gap at Abutment end = 0.040 m
Height of (bearing +pedestal) = 0.35 m Length of Pedestal = 0.800 m
Height of crash barrier = 1.00 m Thickness of Wearing Coat = 0.065 m
No. of bearings = 4.00 No. of bearings = 4.00
Type of bearing = Pot-PTFE Pile capacity = 250 T
Width of footpath on LHS = 0.00 m Span ex to ex (skew) = 25.00 m
Width of footpath on RHS = 0.00 m Span bearing to bearing (skew) = 23.50 m
Width of hand rail on LHS = 0.00 m
Width of hand rail on RHS = 0.00 m

Length of Pile Foundation Toe side = 1.95 m

Length of pile foundation at heel side = 2.25 m
Grade of concrete = M 35
Grade of Steel = Fe 500

Overall width of road = 12.00 m

Width of Handrail ON LHS = 0.00 m
Width of Handrail ON RHS = 0.00 m
Width of Footpath = 0.00 m
Width of crashbarrier = 0.50 m

ASOM PWRD AXOM MALA PROJECT

Feedback Infra Pvt. Ltd. Design of Abutment

Loads and Forces from Superstructure

From Girder

C/C span (Brg to Brg) = 23.500 m

Max Depth of Superstructure = 1.920 m
Width of Crash Barrier = 0.500 m
Constant portion of girder = 1.500 m
Tapered portion of girder = 1.500 m
Central Portion of girder = 17.500 m
Projection of expansion joint to C/l of bearing = 0.750 m
No of Bearing = 4.0 Nos
C/c of bearing = 3.0 m
Section at end Section at mid Left Span

0.800 0.22 0.800 0.22

0.15 0.15
0 0.1

1.7 1.55 1.7 0.3 1.05

0 0.15
0 0.25

0.750 0.75
Crosssectional Area = 1.2825 m ² Crosssectional Area = 0.756 m ²

ASOM PWRD AXOM MALA PROJECT

Feedback Infra Pvt. Ltd. Design of Abutment

Dead Load calculations

Dead Load calculations

C/s Weight Weight

Description unit wt Nos. Span-2 P-Span
C/s span-2 /m-Left
/m- Ecc. Span
span
Right
m2 m2 t/m3 t/m kN/m m m m t
Girders 0.85702 2.5 4.0 8.57021 0 0 25 0 107.1277
Slab 2.640 2.50 1 6.60 0.00 0.00 25.00 82.5
End diaphragms 0.58 2.50 2 2.90 0.00 0.00 8.25 0.00 11.9625

Total DL 201.59

Superimposed Dead Loads Moment

Wearing coat 2.2 0.715 0.000 25.00 19.7 0.000
C/B - LHS 2.5 0.330 -5.750 25.00 10.3 -59.3
C/B- LHS 2.5 0.330 5.750 25.00 10.3 59.297
Railing-RHS 2.5 0.000 5.750 25.00 0.0 0.000
0.000 Total SIDL 40.29 0.000
Superimposed Live Loads
F/P - LHS - LL 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00 0.000 0.00 0.000
F/P - RHS - LL 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00 0.000 0.00 0.000
Total SILL 0.00 0.00

Total DL 201.6 0.0

Total SIDL 40.3 0.0
Eccentricity 0.0000

DL Reaction = 201.6 t DL Reaction including 10%extra weight on RHS t

SIDL Reaction = 40.3 t SIDL Reaction t
FPLL Reaction = 0.0 t FPLL Reaction t
Transverse eccy.
Due to SIDL = 0.00 m Towards right side of carriageway
Due to FPLL = 0.00 m

ASOM PWRD AXOM MALA PROJECT

Feedback Infra Pvt. Ltd. Design of Abutment

Live Load Reaction Calculations Design of abutment for Fixed Bearing

Class A - 1 lane 3 m= 0.05 0.03
Fh- Fh/2 + Governing
R1 R2 P (TON) ML Fh-Span Fh/2 μ(Rg+Rq) horizontal
μ(Rg+Rq) μ(Rg+Rq) load

39.870 15.530 39.87 0.00 11.08 5.54 14.09 -3.01 19.63 19.63
Class 70R Wheel - 1 lane reactions
Fh- Fh/2 + Governing
R1 R2 P ML Fh-Span Fh/2 μ(Rg+Rq)
μ(Rg+Rq) μ(Rg+Rq) Braking load

75.680 24.320 75.68 0.00 20.00 10.00 15.88 4.12 25.88 25.88
Class A 1 Lane reactions+Class 70R WHEEL
Fh- Fh/2 + Governing
R1 R2 P ML Fh-Span Fh/2 μ(Rg+Rq)
μ(Rg+Rq) μ(Rg+Rq) Braking load

115.55 39.85 115.55 0.00 22.77 11.39 17.87 4.90 29.26 29.26
SV Loading
Fh- Fh/2 + Governing
R1 R2 P ML Fh-Span Fh/2 μ(Rg+Rq) μ(Rg+Rq) μ(Rg+Rq) Braking load

162.88 143.42 162.88 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Class A 3 Lane reactions
Fh- Fh/2 + Governing
R1 R2 P ML Fh-Span Fh/2 μ(Rg+Rq) μ(Rg+Rq) μ(Rg+Rq) Braking load

119.61 46.59 119.61 0.00 17.94 8.97 18.07 -0.13 27.05 27.05
SEISMIC CASE
Class A - 1 lane
Fh/2 + Governing Net Horizontal
R1 R2 P ML Fh-Span Fh/2 μ(Rg+Rq) Braking load force
μ(Rg+Rq) LL Factor= 20%
7.97 3.11 7.97 0.00 2.22 1.11 12.49 13.60 13.60 13.60
Class 70R Wheel - 1 lane reactions
Fh/2 + Governing Net Horizontal
R1 R2 P ML Fh-Span Fh/2 μ(Rg+Rq) Braking load force
μ(Rg+Rq)
15.14 4.86 15.14 0.00 5.00 2.50 12.85 15.35 15.35 15.35
Class A 1 Lane reactions+Class 70R WHEEL
Fh/2 + Governing Net Horizontal
R1 R2 P ML Fh-Span Fh/2 μ(Rg+Rq) Braking load force
μ(Rg+Rq)
23.11 7.97 23.11 0.00 7.77 3.89 13.25 17.13 17.13 17.13
Class 70R Track - 1 lane reactions
Fh/2 + Governing Net Horizontal
R1 R2 P ML Fh-Span Fh/2 μ(Rg+Rq) Braking load force
μ(Rg+Rq)
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 12.09 12.09 12.09 12.09
Class A 3 Lane reactions
Fh/2 + Governing Net Horizontal
R1 R2 P ML Fh-Span Fh/2 μ(Rg+Rq) Braking load force
μ(Rg+Rq)
23.92 9.32 23.92 0.00 8.31 4.16 13.29 17.44 17.44 17.44

ASOM PWRD AXOM MALA PROJECT

Feedback Infra Pvt. Ltd. Design of Abutment

Summary Ht (m)= 3.929 (Height from bearing to pile cap top) For non seismic case
Eccentrici
R1 R2 P ML Hz Tr. Mt Fh Ml Mt
ty
Class A 3 Lane reactions
119.610 46.590 119.610 0.000 17.445 0.950 113.630 27.045 106.260 113.630

Class 70R Wheel - 1 lane reactions

75.680 24.320 75.680 0.000 20.000 2.950 223.256 25.878 101.674 223.256

Class A 1 Lane reactions+Class 70R WHEEL

115.550 39.850 115.550 0.000 22.770 0.750 86.663 29.256 114.948 86.663

SV Loading
162.880 143.420 162.880 0.000 0.000 0.300 48.864 0.000 0.000 48.864

Summary Ht (m)= 3.929 (Height from bearing to pile cap top) For Seismic case
Eccentrici Net Horizontal
R1 R2 P ML Fh Tr. Mt force Ml Mt
ty
Class A 3 Lane reactions
23.922 9.318 23.922 0.000 8.310 0.950 22.73 17.445 68.541 22.726

Class 70R Wheel - 1 lane reactions

15.136 4.864 15.136 0.000 5.000 2.950 44.65 15.351 60.313 44.651

Class A 1 Lane reactions+Class 70R WHEEL

23.110 7.970 23.110 0.000 7.770 0.750 17.333 17.134 67.321 17.333

Governing values to Load calculations table in Normal Case

Eccentrici
P ML Hz Tr. Mt Fh Ml Mt
ty
119.61 46.59 119.61 0.00 17.44 0.95 113.63 27.05 106.26 113.63 Max Load Case
115.55 39.85 115.55 0.00 22.77 0.75 86.66 29.26 114.95 86.66 Max Long. Moment Case
75.68 24.32 75.68 0.00 20.00 2.95 223.26 25.88 101.67 223.26 Max Trans. Moment Case
162.88 143.42 162.88 0.00 0.00 0.30 48.86 0.00 0.00 48.86 SV Loading Case
Governing values to Load calculations table in Seismic Case
Eccentrici
P ML Hz Tr. Mt Fh Ml Mt
ty
23.92 9.32 23.92 0.00 8.31 0.95 22.73 17.44 68.54 22.73 Max Load Case
23.92 9.32 23.92 0.00 8.31 0.95 22.73 17.44 68.54 22.73 Max Long. Moment Case
15.14 4.86 15.14 0.00 5.00 2.95 44.65 15.35 60.31 44.65 Max Trans. Moment Case

ASOM PWRD AXOM MALA PROJECT

Feedback Infra Pvt. Ltd. Design of Abutment

Seismic Coefficients
Abutment height above pile cap = 3.58 m
TRANSVERSE SEISMIC COEFFICIENTS
Rocky 1+15T 0.0<=T<=0.10
Sa/g= 2.500 0.1<= T <=0.40
1.00/T 0.40<= T <=4.0
Medium Soil 1+15T 0.0<= T <=0.10
Sa/g= 2.500 0.1<= T <=0.55
1.36/T 0.550<= T <=4.0
Soft Soil 1+15T 0.0<=T<=0.10
Sa/g= 2.500 0.1<= T <=0.670
1.67/T 0.670<= T <=4.0
width 12.0 m depth 0.9 m
Length = 3.58 m
Grade of Concrete= 35 DL Reactions = 987 t
Modulus of elasticity E= 32000.000 LL Reactions = 24 t
Moment of Inertia I = 5.468E+11
Response Reduction Factor = 1.0
Importance Factor = 1.2 ZONE FACTOR
Zone No = V From Addendum
Zone Factor = 0.36 to IRC: 6 - 2017
D.L & L.L of Super Structure = 9919 KN Zone No a
Period (T) = 0.224 II 0.1
P= 793891 from staad analysis III 0.16
Type of Soil = Soft Soil IV 0.24
Sa/g = 2.500 V 0.36
Horizontal Coefficients = 0.5400

LONGITUDINAL SEISMIC COEFFICIENTS

Rocky 1+15T 0.0<=T<=0.10
Sa/g= 2.500 0.1<= T <=0.40
1.00/T 0.40<= T <=4.0
Medium Soil 1+15T 0.0<= T <=0.10
Sa/g= 2.500 0.1<= T <=0.55
1.36/T 0.550<= T <=4.0
Soft Soil 1+15T 0.0<=T<=0.10
Sa/g= 2.500 0.1<= T <=0.670
1.67/T 0.670<= T <=4.0
width 12.0 m depth 0.9 m
Length = 3.58 m
Grade of Concrete= 35.0 m DL Reactions = 987 t
Modulus of elasticity E= 32000.0 m LL Reactions = 0 t
Moment of Inertia I = 5.468E+11
Response Reduction Factor = 3
Importance Factor = 1.2 ZONE FACTOR
Zone No = V as per
Zone Factor = 0.36 IRC: 6 - 2017
D.L & L.L of Super Structure = 9871.8 KN Zone No a
Period (T) = 0.223 II 0.1
P= 793891 from staad analysis III 0.16
Type of Soil = Medium Soil IV 0.24
Sa/g = 2.500 V 0.36
Horizontal Coefficients = 0.1800

ASOM PWRD AXOM MALA PROJECT

Feedback Infra Pvt. Ltd. Design of Abutment

DESIGN OF ABUTMENTS

The GA of abutment is as below (All Dimensions in mm) Total Width of Abutment = 12.00 m
300 Cut out for span = 25.00 m
Surcharge load 300 Exp. Joint RL 64.700
Approach Slab 300

300
Tr. Moment from Superstructure

Girder and slab

7
= In table below

300
8

height
2110
6
P = In table below
300 CL of Bearing
300 750 570

1560
Hzl. Force = In table below
Bearing and

350
Pedestal height RL 62.240

400
400
270 HFL RL 61.022
4
3

5539 mm
600
5
1
600
2

Formation Level
12

3079 mm

Overall Height
600

above GL to
750

7715 mm
11
RL 59.161 Ground Level
1a
13

1.950 m 500
14

900 RL 58.661
1800 mm 1800 mm
10 1800
0 mm RL 56.86
9
A
Pile diameter
1.20 m Φ 1.20 m Φ 3554 mm
1.80 m 1.80 m RL 53.307 SCOUR
0.75 m 0.75 m
5.1

ASOM PWRD AXOM MALA PROJECT

Feedback Infra Pvt. Ltd. Design of Abutment

DESIGN DATA
a) SOIL DATA

Density of Soil Fill = 2.00 t/m3

Angle of Internal Friction = f = 30 º
Surcharge Angle = b = 0º
Wall Angle = a = 90 º
Angle of Wall Friction = d = 20 º
Friction Coefficient = m = 0.50
Surcharge Height = 1.20 m
sin2 (a + f ) cosd 1
Normal: Ka = x = 0.279
sin2 a sin(a - d ) é sin(f + d ) sin(f - b ) ù
2

ê1 + ú
ê
ë sin(a - d ) sin(a + b ) ûú

slope of earth fill (ς) 0.00

Long horizontal seismic coefficient (αh) 0.180
Long vertical seismic coefficient (αv) 0.120
Trans vertical seismic coefficient (αv) 0.360
Trans horizontal seismic coefficient (αh) 0.540
Wall angle (alpha ') 0.00 º
λ 11.57 º
b) CONCRETE DATA
Density of Concrete = 2.5 t/m3
Grade of Concrete = M 35

ASOM PWRD AXOM MALA PROJECT

Feedback Infra Pvt. Ltd. Design of Abutment

Normal Case:

P1 = 4.049 T

P1 = 10.189 T 7.839 m

4.820 m
4.336 m GL

3.374t/m

Pilecap base 1.800 m A

4.380t/m
0.671t/m
P2 19.0960 2.383 T 3.55 m
#####

6.366t/m Scour Level

ASOM PWRD AXOM MALA PROJECT

Feedback Infra Pvt. Ltd. Design of Abutment

LOAD CALCULATION FOR NET LOADS AT A

OVERTURNING LOADS (PER RUNNING M OF WALL) UPTO PILECAP TOP
Total Horizontal Load due to Earth Pressure = 10.189 T At Lever arm = 2.54 m
Total Horizontal Load due to Surcharge Pressure = 4.049 T At Lever arm = 3.02 m
Hence, Total Horizontal Load = 170.859 T
Total Overturning Moment = 456.84 t-m

OVERTURNING LOADS OF PILECAP BOTTOM

Total Horizobntal load - all loads upto pilecap bottom = 269.092 T
Total Overturning moment of all loads upto pile cap bottom = 925.51 t-m
FOR HFL CASE
Total Horizobntal load - all loads upto pilecap bottom = 240.068 T
Total Overturning moment of all loads upto pile cap bottom = 1388.78 t-m

ASOM PWRD AXOM MALA PROJECT

Feedback Infra Pvt. Ltd. Design of Abutment

Seismic Case:

P1 = 4.049 T

P1 = 10.189 T 7.839 m

3.020 m
2.536 m GL

3.374t/m

Pilecap base 1.800 m A

4.380t/m
0.671t/m
3.55 m

Scour Level

ASOM PWRD AXOM MALA PROJECT

Feedback Infra Pvt. Ltd. Design of Abutment

LOAD CALCULATION FOR NET LOADS AT A

OVERTURNING LOADS (PER RUNNING M OF WALL) UPTO PILECAP TOP
Total Horizontal Load due to Earth Pressure = 10.189 T At Lever arm = 2.54 m Return Wall thickness = 0.5
Total Horizontal Load due to Surcharge Pressure = 4.049 T At Lever arm = 3.02 m
Hence, Total Horizontal Load = 170.859 T
Total Overturning Moment = 456.84 t-m

OVERTURNING LOADS OF PILECAP

Total Horizontal Load due to Earth Pressure = 17.168 T At Lever arm = 3.29 m

Total Horizontal Load due to Surcharge Pressure = 5.256 T At Lever arm = 3.92 m
Total Horizobntal load - all loads upto pilecap bottom = 269.092 T
Total Overturning moment of all loads upto pile cap bottom = 925.51 t-m

STABILISING LOADS:
Long TransHoriz
Vertical Trans
HZL. Dist. From Vertical Horizontal Horizontal ontal
Area No. Width Description Length Height Density Vertical Load Moment at A seismic Horizontal
A seismic seismic seismic seismic
moment seismic
moment moment
1 12.00 m Vertical Wall 0.600 3.579 2.500 64.422 2.550 164.276 7.731 19.713 11.596 41.624 34.788 124.871
1a 12.00 m Vertical Wall 0.300 2.579 2.500 11.606 2.150 24.950 1.393 2.994 2.089 7.498 6.267 22.495
2 12.00 m Dirtwall Haunch 0.750 0.600 2.500 6.750 3.250 21.938 0.810 2.633 1.215 5.806 3.645 17.419
3 12.00 m Dirtwall Haunch 0.750 0.400 2.500 9.000 3.375 30.375 1.080 3.645 1.620 8.390 4.860 25.170
4 12.00 m Corbel for bearing 0.270 0.400 2.500 3.240 1.965 6.367 0.389 0.764 0.583 3.020 1.750 9.061
5 12.00 m Corbel for bearing 0.270 0.600 2.500 2.430 2.010 4.884 0.292 0.586 0.437 2.090 1.312 6.271
6 12.00 m Dirtwall 0.300 2.460 2.500 22.140 3.600 79.704 2.657 9.564 3.985 25.740 11.956 77.221
7 12.00 m Approach slab corbel 0.300 0.300 2.500 2.700 3.900 10.530 0.324 1.264 0.486 3.591 1.458 10.773
8 12.00 m Approach slab corbel 0.300 0.300 2.500 1.350 3.850 5.198 0.162 0.624 0.243 1.735 0.729 5.204
9 12.30 m Heel of pilecap 2.250 1.800 2.500 124.538 4.050 504.377 14.945 60.525 22.417 20.175 67.250 60.525
10 12.30 m Toe of pile cap 1.950 1.800 2.500 107.933 0.825 89.044 12.952 10.685 19.428 17.485 58.284 52.455
11 11.30 m Soil Fill on heel 0.750 2.579 2.000 43.714 3.375 147.535 5.246 17.704 0.000 0.000 23.606 72.929
12 11.30 m Soil Fill on heel 0.750 0.600 2.000 5.085 3.250 16.526 0.610 1.983 0.000 0.000 2.746 12.573
13 11.30 m Soil Fill on heel 1.500 6.039 2.000 204.722 4.050 829.125 24.567 99.495 0.000 0.000 110.550 532.795
14 12.30 m soil fill on toe 1.950 0.500 2.000 23.985 0.825 19.788 2.878 2.375 0.000 0.000 12.952 26.551
15 12.30 m Reduce area 7 & 8 2.000 -3.240 - -12.582 -0.389 -1.510 -0.583 -1.750 -
16 12.30 m VC normal of EP 97.941 3.000 293.824 - - - -
17 12.30 m VC seismic of EP 97.941 3.000 293.824 11.753 35.259 - -
18 0.50 m Retaining wall Load 2.250 6.039 2.500 16.985 3.825 64.966 2.038 7.796 3.057 14.734 9.1717313 44.203
Total Stabilising Loads Normal 745.30 2300.82

ASOM PWRD AXOM MALA PROJECT

Feedback Infra Pvt. Ltd. Design of Abutment

STABILISING LOADS: HFL CASE

HZL. Dist. From

Area No. Width Description Length Height Density Vertical Load Moment at A
A

1 12.00 m Vertical Wall up to HFL 0.600 1.218 2.500 21.924 2.550 55.906
1 12.00 m Vertical Wall below HFL 0.600 2.361 1.500 25.499 2.550 65.022
1a 12.00 m Vertical Wall up to HFL 0.300 0.218 2.500 0.981 2.150 2.109
1a 12.00 m Vertical Wall below HFL 0.300 2.361 1.500 6.375 2.150 13.704
2 12.00 m Dirtwall Haunch 0.750 0.600 2.500 13.500 3.250 43.875
3 12.00 m Dirtwall Haunch 0.750 0.400 2.500 9.000 3.375 30.375
4 12.00 m Corbel for bearing 0.270 0.400 2.500 1.620 1.965 3.183
5 12.00 m Corbel for bearing 0.270 0.600 2.500 4.860 2.010 9.769
6 12.00 m Dirtwall 0.300 2.460 2.500 22.140 3.600 79.704
7 12.00 m Approach slab corbel 0.300 0.300 2.500 1.350 3.900 5.265
8 12.00 m Approach slab corbel 0.300 0.300 2.500 2.700 3.850 10.395
9 12.30 m Heel of pilecap 2.250 1.800 1.500 74.723 4.050 302.626
10 12.30 m Toe of pile cap 1.950 1.800 1.500 64.760 0.825 53.427
11 12.30 m Soil Fill on heel above HFL 0.750 0.218 2.000 2.011 3.375 6.787
11 12.30 m Soil Fill on heel below HFL 0.750 2.361 1.000 21.780 3.375 73.508
12 12.30 m Soil Fill on heel 0.750 0.600 2.000 11.070 3.375 37.361
13 12.30 m Soil Fill on heel above HFL 1.500 3.678 2.000 67.859 4.050 274.829
13 12.30 m Soil Fill on heel below HFL 1.500 2.361 1.000 21.780 4.050 88.210
14 12.30 m soil fill on toe 1.950 0.500 2.000 11.993 0.825 9.894
15 12.30 m Reduce area 7 & 8 2.000 -3.240 - -12.528
16 12.30 m VC normal of EP 87.378 3.000 262.133
18 12.30 m Retaining wall Load above HFL 2.250 3.678 2.500 254.472 3.825 973.354
18 12.30 m Retaining wall Load below HFL 2.250 2.361 1.500 98.011 3.825 374.892
Total Stabilising Loads Normal 822.54 2763.80
Normal Case:
Final Loads and Bending Moments at the centre of base are as below
Total Vertical Load = 745.300 T
Total Moment = -1373.4 t-m Against OTM

ASOM PWRD AXOM MALA PROJECT

Feedback Infra Pvt. Ltd. Design of Abutment

SUMMARY OF LOADS AT CENTRE OF BASE FOR ENTIRE WIDTH OF ABUTMENTS SKEW ANGLE= 0
Vertical Horizontal Horizontal Transverse
Sl. No. Description Long. Moment
Load load-long. load-trans. moment
1 Overturning & stabilsing loads 745.30 269.09 0.00
2 Dead loads from superstructure
Girder+slab loads 201.59 0.00
SIDL 20.63 0.00
WC 19.66 0.00
Live loads (Max load) 119.61 0.00 113.63
SV Load 162.88 0.00 48.86
(Max Long Moment) 115.55 0.00 86.66
(Max Trans Moment) 75.68 0.00 223.26
Braking loads 3.87 29.26 0.00 157.37 0.00
TRAFFIC DIRECTION
Totals 1153.93 298.35 0.00 157.37 223.26
Θ
Seismic Case:
Final Loads and Bending Moments at the centre of base are as below
Total Vertical Load = 745.300 T
Total Moment = -970.2 t-m Against OTM

SUMMARY OF LOADS AT CENTRE OF BASE FOR ENTIRE WIDTH OF ABUTMENTS SKEW ANGLE= 0
Vertical Horizontal Horizontal Transverse
Sl. No. Description Long. Moment
Load load-long. load-trans. moment
1 Overturning & stabilsing loads 745.30 362.70 0.00
2 Dead loads from superstructure
Girder+slab loads 201.59 0.00
SIDL 20.63 0.00
WC 19.66 0.00
Live loads (Max load) 23.92 0.00 22.73
(Max Long Moment) 23.92 0.00 22.73
(Max Trans Moment) 15.14 0.00 44.65
Braking loads 2.31 17.44 0.00 93.84 0.00 Considering 20% of live load and braking
1 for design of foundation as per irc 6
4 Seismic (Horizontal-long) 150.63 247.26 0.00 650.75 0.000 (increase in seismic force)
5 Seismic (Horizontal-trans) 364.83 0.000 493.11 0.000 1848.81 1 Load Factor in Transverse direction
Long+0.3*Trans+0.3*vertical 260.08 247.26 147.93 650.75 554.64 (refer IRC 6 2017, 219.7)
Totals Comb
0.3*Long+Trans+0.3*vertical 410.02 74.18 493.11 195.22 1848.81
0.3*Long+0.3*Trans+vertical 154.64 74.18 147.93 195.22 554.64
DL+SIDL+0.2LL+0.2Breaking+Seismic Vertical 1147.06 440.37 147.93 213.99 563.57
DL+SIDL+0.2Breaking+Seismic Long 1252.51 613.45 147.93 669.52 563.57
DL+SIDL+0.2LL+0.2Breaking+Seismic Trans 1402.44 440.37 493.11 213.99 1857.74

ASOM PWRD AXOM MALA PROJECT

Feedback Infra Pvt. Ltd. Design of Abutment

ASOM PWRD AXOM MALA PROJECT

Feedback Infra Pvt. Ltd. Design of Abutment

HFl Case:
Final Loads and Bending Moments at the centre of base are as below
Total Vertical Load = 822.544 T
Total Moment = -1372.9 t-m Against OTM

SUMMARY OF LOADS AT CENTRE OF BASE FOR ENTIRE WIDTH OF ABUTMENTS

Vertical Horizontal Horizontal Transverse

Sl. No. Description Long. Moment
Load load-long. load-trans. moment

1 Overturning & stabilsing loads 822.54 240.07 0.00

2 Dead loads from superstructure
Girder+slab loads 201.59 0.00
SIDL 20.63 0.00
TRAFFIC DIRECTION
WC 19.66 0.00
Live loads (Max load) 119.61 0.00 113.63 Θ
SV Load 162.88 0.00 48.86
(Max Long Moment) 115.55 0.00 86.66
(Max Trans Moment) 115.55 0.00 223.26
Braking loads 3.87 29.26 0.00 157.37 0.00
Totals 1231.18 269.32 0.00 157.37 223.26

ASOM PWRD AXOM MALA PROJECT

Feedback Infra Pvt. Ltd. Design of Abutment

PILE LOAD CALCULATIONS

Providing the following arrangement of piles
dia of piles : 1.20 m Ø Projection of pilecap beyond pile = 150 mm
std for clayey = 3.77 m c/c
No. of piles : 8 min for sandy = 3.60 m c/c
Pile cap thickness = 1.80 m Total length of pile = 25.00 m
CALCULATION OF DEPTH OF FIXITY

Free length of pile above soil = 355.4 cm = L1

I = moment of inertia of pile = 10178760 cm4
E = from IRC:112 = 320000 Kg/cm2
Values of hh from table 3 of IS:2911 Soil type hh
Soft Clay 0.675
Very loose sand under repeated loading or normally loading clays

value of hh = 0.675 kg/cm3

Hence, T= 344.12 cm
L1 / T = 1.033
From fig. 4, values of Lf / T or Lf / R
Lf / T = 1.800
Lf = 6.19 m
MIN. EMBEDDED LENGTH OF PILE = 13.76 m
MIN. LENGTH OF PILE = 17 m
Considered = 25 m OK
From fig. 3, values of reduction factor m = 0.80 Consider fixed head pile
The hzl. Loads given below are due to earth pressure on piles from pilecap bottom to scour level only.

ASOM PWRD AXOM MALA PROJECT

Feedback Infra Pvt. Ltd. Design of Abutment

Horizontal Horizontal Long. Transverse

Case Vertical Load
load-long. load-trans. Moment moment
Normal 1154 298 0 157 223
HFL 1231 269 0 157 223
Seismic 1 1147 440 148 214 564
Seismic 2 1253 613 148 670 564
Seismic3 1402 440 493 214 1858
N 8 N Number of piles

Total Ixx = 26
Total Iyy = 130

Normal Case
Pile Group Analysis Applied Load kN Length (X) Width (Y)
Sno X Y Xi^2 yi^2 Normal HFL SEISMIC 1 SEISMIC 2 SEISMIC 3 SIZE OF PILE CAP = 5.1 12
1 -1.8 5.4 3 29.16 143 152 152 134 238
2 -1.8 1.8 3 3.24 136 146 136 118 186
3 -1.8 -1.8 3 3.24 130 140 121 102 135
4 -1.8 -5.4 3 29.16 124 134 105 87 83
5 1.8 5.4 3 29.16 164 174 182 227 268
6 1.8 1.8 3 3.24 158 168 166 211 216
7 1.8 -1.8 3 3.24 152 162 150 195 164
8 1.8 -5.4 3 29.16 146 156 135 180 113
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16

Total 26 129.6

ASOM PWRD AXOM MALA PROJECT

Feedback Infra Pvt. Ltd. Design of Abutment

Y (TRANSVERSE)

-1.8, 5.4 1.8, 5.4 PILE CAP

-1.8, 1.8 1.8, 1.8

Origin
X (LONGITUDINAL)
-1.8, -1.8 1.8, -1.8

-1.8, -5.4 1.8, -5.4

Stem
Sign convention: above diagram shows the positive direction
Pile Arrangement

Summary of Horizontal Load on pile

Horizontal
Case Max capacity
load per pile
Normal 37.29 38.00 t
HFL 33.67
Seismic 1 58.07
Seismic 2 78.88
Seismic3 82.64

Normal Seismic
Normal Case: Permissible
Case Case
Max. Load on pile from distribution = 174.128 t 214.057 t
Min. Load on pile from distribution = 124.011 t 66.431 t
Normal Seismic
Selfweight of pile = 39.584 t Case Case
Total max. axial load = 174.13 t 214.06 t 250.00 t < Hence OK < Hence OK
Total min. axial load = 124.01 t 66.43 t
Moment on Pile = 145.42 t-m
Required Actual pile capacity = 134.54 t
L = L1 + Lf = 9.75 m
Ht. of scour level from fixity point = 6.19 m
Actual horizontal load on piles at top of pile = 37.294 t
Deflection due to horizontal load on piles = 2.27 mm
Perm = 12.00 mm
Total Deflection = 2.268 mm < Hence OK

ASOM PWRD AXOM MALA PROJECT

Feedback Infra Pvt. Ltd. Design of Abutment

F
MOMENTS HORIZONTAL FORCE
At Abutment Shaft Bottom At Footing Bottom At Footing Bottom
At Abutment Shaft Bottom
kN-m kN-m kN kN
Due to active Earth Pressure(Static) 3088.07 6426.67 1974.82 1218.64

Due to active Earth Pressure 1284.55 2809.35 716.67 425.41

(dynamic Increment)
Total Earth Pressure 4372.63 9236.02 2691.49 1644.06

Due to Live Load Surcharge (Static) 1462.37 2369.79 541.68 466.55

Due to Live Load Surcharge(Dynamic) 698.17 1223.19 219.44 169.07

Total 6533.17 12829.00 3452.62 2279.68

ASOM PWRD AXOM MALA PROJECT

Feedback Infra Pvt. Ltd. Design of Abutment

Earth Pressure Calculation at abutment shaft bottom:

Horizontal seismicFcoefficient Ah = Z I Sa AhL = 0.18

2Rg AhT = 0.54

Vertical seismic coefficient Av = 2Ah/3 AvL = 0.12

AvT = 0.36

Here f = Angle of internal friction, = 30 o

d = Angle of friction between soil and concrete = 20.0 o

dsubmerged= d dry
1/2 = 10.0 o

o
i = Surcharge angle = 0
a = Angle of wall face with horizontal = 90 o

g = Dry density of earth = 2.0 t/m3

gsat = Saturated density of earth = 2.0 t/m3
gsub = Submerged density of earth = 1.0 t/m3
Length of abutment = 12.00 m

Coefficent of Active earth pressure

From Coulomb's theory of active earth pressure
2
Sin (a + f )
Ka =
2
2 é sin(f + d ).sin(f − i) ù
Sin a. sin(a − d ).ê1 + ú
ëê sin(a − d ).sin(a + i) ûú

Kadry = 0.297
Kasubmerged = 0.308

LWL Condition : Active earth pressure

Earth Pressure intensity p1 = 0.297x2x5.539 FRL : 64.70

2
= 3.294 t/m

Earth Pressure intensity p2 = 3.294 + 0.308x1x0.5

2
= 3.4479 t/m F1
p1
F1 = 1/2x3.294x5.539 x Cos (20) LWL : 59.16
= 8.5716 t/m Lever arm factor
0.42/0.333 =1.26 F2
Lever arm @ base = (0.5 + 5.539/3 )x 1.26
= 2.956 m F3
Shaft bottom : 58.66
F2 = 3.294 x 0.5 x COS(20) p2
= 1.55 t/m

ASOM PWRD AXOM MALA PROJECT

Feedback Infra Pvt. Ltd. Design of Abutment

Lever arm @ base = 0.5/2

= 0.25 m

F3 = 1/2*(3.448 - 3.294) x 1 x COS(20)

= 0.04 t/m
Lever arm @ base = 0.5 / 3
= 0.17 m

Total Earth pressure HL = (8.572 + 1.548 + 0.036 ) x12 = 121.86 t

Total Moment about base MTT = (8.572x2.956 + 1.548x0.25 + 0.036x0.167 ) x12

= 308.81 tm

F3 p2 p1 F2
F1

ASOM PWRD AXOM MALA PROJECT

Feedback Infra Pvt. Ltd. Design of Abutment

Live load surcharge pressure : F3 p2 p1 F2

F1
FRL : 64.70
surcharge intensity = 1.2 x 2 p1
2
= 2.4 t/m
surcharge pressure intensity p1 = 0.297 x 2.4
2 F1
= 0.714 t/m

2
surcharge pressure intensity p2 = 0.370 t/m LWL : 59.16
p2
LWL condition : F2
Surcharge pressure F1 = 0.714 x 5.539 x 12 x Cos(20) Shaft bottom : 58.66
= 44.568 t
Lever arm from base = 3.2695 m

Surcharge pressure F2 = 0.37 x 0.5 x 12 x Cos(20)

= 2.087 t
Lever arm from base = 0.25 m

Total surcharge prsessure FL = 44.57 + 2.09

= 46.655 tonne

Total Moment about base MTT = 44.57 x 3.27 + 2.09 x 0.25

= 146.24 tm

p2 p1
Dynamic Increment of Earth Pressure :
Dynamic Increment of Earth Considered = Yes
ah = 0.18
av = 0.12
l Formula used For +av -av
l dry = ah 9.130 11.560 o

1 ± av

l submerged = gsat * ah 17.82 22.249 o

(gsat - 1) (1 ± av)

Coefficent of Active Earth pressure

Ca =
(1  av)* Sin2 (a + f − l)
2
2 é sin(f + d ).sin(f − i − l) ù
Cosl * Sin a. sin(a − d − l). ê1 + ú
êë sin(a − d − l).sin(a + i) úû

Coefficent of Passive Earth pressure

2
(1 + av) * Sin (a − f + l )
Cp =
2
2 é sin(f + d ).sin(f + i − l ) ù
Cosl * Sin a . sin(a + d + l ). ê1 − ú
êë sin(a + d + l ).sin(a + i) úû

Seismic case Ca Cp
For Seismic downward dry condition 0.401 5.828
For Seismic downward submerged condition 0.515 3.434

For Seismic upward dry condition 0.336 4.3548

For Seismic upward submerged condition 0.484 2.6979

Calculation of Active earth pressure dynamic increment, for different conditions :

FOR Seismic downward, LWL condition
FRL : 64.70 0.310

3.02

0.937 Mid height

0.936
LWL : 59.16 0.026 2.52 0.285
0.05 0.284
0.50
Shaft
bottom 58.66
Variation of Earth
pressure coefficent Dynamic Increment

Dynamic increment coefficent at FRL = 3*(Cadry -Kadry) = 0.3103

at LWL = 3*(Cadry-Kadry) *h'/H = 0.0257

at LWL = 3*(Casub-Kasub) *h'/H = 0.0513

at Founding Lvl. = = 0

Dynamic earth pressure/m width = 3.77 t/m width *(Area of above paraboal)
Total Dynamic earth pressure = 3.77 x 12 x COS(20)
= 42.54 Tonne
Lever arm from base = 3.02 m *(cg. of above paraboal)

Surcharge Pressure Dynamic increment :

p1 FRL : 64.70
surcharge intensity = 1.2 x 2
2
= 2.4 t/m
2
surcharge pressure intensity p1 = 0.497 t/m F1

2
surcharge pressure intensity p2 = 0.041 t/m
LWL : 59.16
2 p3 p2
surcharge pressure intensity p3 = 0.041 t/m
LWL condition : F2
Surcharge pressure F1 = 16.79 t Shaft bottom : 58.66

Lever arm from base = 4.16 m

Surcharge pressure F2 = 0.1158 t

Lever arm from base = 0.33 m

Total surcharge prsessure FL = 16.907 tonne

Lever arm from base = (16.79 x 4.16 + 0.12 x 0.33) / 16.91

= 4.13 tm

Dynamic increment component

Horizontal Force FL = 16.907 tonne
Lever arm factor
Lever arm from base = 4.13 m 0.66/0.5 =1.32

Moment @ base MTT = 69.82 tm

p2p1

FOR Seismic upward, LWL condition

FRL : 64.700 0.117

3.02

0.353 Mid height

0.794
LWL : 59.161 0.010 2.52 0.107
0.04 0.241
0.50
Shaft
bottom 58.661
Variation of Earth
pressure coefficent Dynamic Increment

Dynamic increment coefficent at FRL = 3*(Cadry -Kadry) = 0.117

at LWL = 3*(Cadry-Kadry) *h'/H = 0.0097

at LWL = 3*(Casub-Kasub) *h'/H = 0.0435

at Founding Lvl. = = 0

Dynamic earth pressure/m width = 1.46 t/m width *(Area of above paraboal)
Total Dynamic earth pressure = 1.46 x 12 x COS(20)
= 16.42 Tonne
Lever arm from base = 2.96 m *(cg. of above paraboal)

ASOM PWRD AXOM MALA PROJECT

Feedback Infra Pvt. Ltd. Design of Abutment

Surcharge Pressure Dynamic increment :

p1 FRL : 64.70
surcharge intensity = 1.2 x 2
2
= 2.4 t/m
2
surcharge pressure intensity p1 = 0.187 t/m F1

2
surcharge pressure intensity p2 = 0.015 t/m
LWL : 59.16
2 p3 p2
surcharge pressure intensity p3 = 0.035 t/m
LWL condition : F2
Surcharge pressure F1 = 6.33 t Shaft bottom : 58.66

Lever arm from base = 4.16 m

Surcharge pressure F2 = 0.0982 t

Lever arm from base = 0.33 m

Total surcharge prsessure FL = 6.33 + 0.1

= 6.426 tonne

Lever arm from base = (6.33 x 4.16 + 0.1 x 0.33) / 6.43

= 4.10 tm

Dynamic increment component

Horizontal Force FL = 6.426 tonne

Lever arm from base = 4.10 m

Moment @ base MTT = 26.33 tm

p2p1

SUMMERY OF ACTIVE EARTH PRESSURE : Dynamic Increment/Decrement

Static forces Seismic Downward Seismic Upward
Loads HL MTT HL MTT HL MTT
LWL CONDITION
Active earth pressure 121.86 308.81 42.54 128.46 16.42 48.54
Surcharge pressure 46.66 146.24 16.91 69.82 6.43 26.33

HFL CONDITION
Active earth pressure 121.86 308.81 43.37 128.73 17.12 48.77
Surcharge pressure 46.66 146.24 20.39 79.55 10.30 39.75

ASOM PWRD AXOM MALA PROJECT

Feedback Infra Pvt. Ltd. Design of Abutment

EARTH PRESSURE CALCULATION

Horizontal seismicFcoefficient Ah = Z I Sa AhL = 0.18
2Rg AhT = 0.54

Vertical seismic coefficient Av = 2Ah/3 AvL = 0.12

AvT = 0.36

ASOM PWRD AXOM MALA PROJECT

Feedback Infra Pvt. Ltd. Design of Abutment

Earth Pressure Calculation at founding level:

Here f = Angle of internal friction, = 30 o

d = Angle of friction between soil and concrete = 20 o

dsubmerged= d dry
1/2 = 10 o

o
i = Surcharge angle = 0
a = Angle of wall face with horizontal = 90 o

g = Dry density of earth = 2.0 t/m3

gsat = Saturated density of earth = 2.0 t/m3
gsub = Submerged density of earth = 1.0 t/m3
Length of abutment = 12.00 m

Coefficent of Active earth pressure

From Coulomb's theory of active earth pressure
2
Sin (a + f )
Ka =
2
2 é sin(f + d ).sin(f − i) ù
Sin a. sin(a − d ).ê1 + ú
ëê sin(a − d ).sin(a + i) ûú

Kadry = 0.297
Kasubmerged = 0.308

LWL Condition : Active earth pressure

Earth Pressure intensity p1 = 0.297x2x5.539 FRL : 64.70

2
= 3.294 t/m

Earth Pressure intensity p2 = 3.294 + 0.308x1x2.3

2 F1
= 4.00311 t/m
p1
F1 = 1/2x3.294x5.539 x Cos (20) LWL : 59.16
= 8.5716 t/m Lever arm factor
0.42/0.333 =1.26
F2
Lever arm @ base = (2.3 + 5.539/3 )x 1.26
F3
= 5.224 m
Found. Level : 56.86
p2
F2 = 3.294 x 2.3 x COS(20)
= 7.12 t/m
Lever arm @ base = 2.3/2
= 1.15 m

F3 = 1/2*(4.003 - 3.294) x 2 x COS(20)

= 0.77 t/m
Lever arm @ base = 2.3 / 3
= 0.77 m

Total Earth pressure HL = (8.572 + 7.119 + 0.767 ) x12 = 197.48 t

Total Moment about base MTT = (8.572x5.224 + 7.119x1.15 + 0.767x0.767 ) x12

= 642.667 tm

ASOM PWRD AXOM MALA PROJECT

Feedback Infra Pvt. Ltd. Design of Abutment

ASOM PWRD AXOM MALA PROJECT

Feedback Infra Pvt. Ltd. Design of Abutment

Live load surcharge pressure :

FRL : 64.70
surcharge intensity = 1.2 x 2 p1
2
= 2.4 t/m
surcharge pressure intensity p1 = 0.297 x 2.4 F1
2
= 0.714 t/m

surcharge pressure intensity p2 = 0.370 t/m2 LWL : 59.16

p2
LWL condition : F2
Surcharge pressure F1 = 0.714 x 5.539 x 12 x Cos(20) Foundi. Lvl : 56.86
= 44.5682 t
Lever arm from base = 5.0695 m

Surcharge pressure F2 = 0.37 x 2.3 x 12 x Cos(20)

= 9.60026 t
Lever arm from base = 1.15 m

Total surcharge prsessure FL = 44.57 + 9.6

= 54.168 tonne

Total Moment about base MTT = 44.57 x 5.07 + 9.6 x 1.15

= 236.979 tm

Dynamic Increment of Earth Pressure : p2 p1

Dynamic Increment of Earth Considered = Yes
ah = 0.18
av = 0.12
l Formula used For +av -av
l dry = ah 9.130 11.560 o

1 ± av

l submerged = gsat * ah 17.82 22.249 o

(gsat - 1) (1 ± av)

ASOM PWRD AXOM MALA PROJECT

Feedback Infra Pvt. Ltd. Design of Abutment

Coefficent of Active Earth pressure

Ca =
(1  av)* Sin2 (a + f − l)
2
2 é sin(f + d ).sin(f − i − l) ù
Cosl * Sin a. sin(a − d − l). ê1 + ú
êë sin(a − d − l).sin(a + i) úû

Coefficent of Passive Earth pressure

2
(1 + av) * Sin (a − f + l )
Cp =
2
2 é sin(f + d ).sin(f + i − l ) ù
Cosl * Sin a. sin(a + d + l ). ê1 − ú
êë sin(a + d + l ).sin(a + i) úû

Seismic case Ca Cp
For Seismic downward dry condition 0.401 5.828
For Seismic downward submerged condition 0.515 3.434

For Seismic upward dry condition 0.336 4.354780768

For Seismic upward submerged condition 0.484 2.697850409

Calculation of Active earth pressure dynamic increment, for different conditions :

FOR Seismic downward, LWL condition
FRL : 64.700 0.310

3.92

1.216 Mid height

1.215
LWL : 59.161 0.091 1.62 1.009
0.18 1.008
2.30

Found : 56.861
Variation of Earth
pressure coefficent Dynamic Increment

Dynamic increment coefficent at FRL = 3*(Cadry -Kadry) = 0.3103

at LWL = 3*(Cadry-Kadry) *h'/H = 0.0911

at LWL = 3*(Casub-Kasub) *h'/H = 0.1819

at Founding Lvl. = = 0

Dynamic earth pressure/m width = 6.36 t/m width *(Area of above paraboal)
Total Dynamic earth pressure = 6.36 x 12 x COS(20)
= 71.67 Tonne
Lever arm from base = 3.92 m *(cg. of above paraboal)

ASOM PWRD AXOM MALA PROJECT

Feedback Infra Pvt. Ltd. Design of Abutment

Surcharge Pressure Dynamic increment :

p1 FRL : 64.70
surcharge intensity = 1.2 x 2
2
= 2.4 t/m
surcharge pressure intensity p1 = 0.497 t/m2 F1

2
surcharge pressure intensity p2 = 0.14569 t/m
LWL : 59.16
p3 p2
surcharge pressure intensity p3 = 0.146 t/m2
F2
LWL condition : Foundi. Lvl : 56.86
Surcharge pressure F1 = 20.06 t

Lever arm from base = 5.96 m

Surcharge pressure F2 = 1.88737 t

Lever arm from base = 1.518 m

Total surcharge prsessure FL = 20.06 + 1.89

= 21.944 tonne

Lever arm from base = (20.06 x 5.96 + 1.89 x 1.52) / 21.94

= 5.57 m

Dynamic increment component

Horizontal Force FL = 21.944 tonne

Lever arm from base = 5.57 m

Moment @ base MTT = 122.32 tm

p2p1

ASOM PWRD AXOM MALA PROJECT

Feedback Infra Pvt. Ltd. Design of Abutment

FOR Seismic upward, LWL condition p2p1

FRL : 64.700 0.117

3.92

0.458 Mid height

1.031
LWL : 59.161 0.034 1.62 0.380
0.15 0.855
2.30

Found : 56.861
Variation of Earth
pressure coefficent Dynamic Increment

ASOM PWRD AXOM MALA PROJECT

Feedback Infra Pvt. Ltd. Design of Abutment

Dynamic increment coefficent at FRL = 3*(Cadry -Kadry) = 0.117

at LWL = 3*(Cadry-Kadry) *h'/H = 0.0343

at LWL = 3*(Casub-Kasub) *h'/H = 0.1543

at Founding Lvl. = = 0

Dynamic earth pressure/m width = 3.02 t/m width *(Area of above paraboal)
Total Dynamic earth pressure = 3.02 x 12 x COS(20)
= 34.02 Tonne
Lever arm from base = 3.42 m *(cg. of above paraboal)

Surcharge Pressure Dynamic increment :

p1 FRL : 64.70
surcharge intensity = 1.2 x 2
2
= 2.4 t/m
2
surcharge pressure intensity p1 = 0.187 t/m F1

surcharge pressure intensity p2 = 0.055 t/m2

LWL : 59.16
2 p3 p2
surcharge pressure intensity p3 = 0.12346 t/m
LWL condition : F2
Surcharge pressure F1 = 7.56 t Foundi. Lvl : 56.86

Lever arm from base = 5.96 m

Surcharge pressure F2 = 1.60096 t

Lever arm from base = 1.518 m

Total surcharge prsessure FL = 7.56 + 1.6

= 9.160 tonne

Lever arm from base = (7.56 x 5.96 + 1.6 x 1.52) / 9.16

= 5.18 tm

Dynamic increment component

Horizontal Force FL = 9.160 tonne

Lever arm from base = 5.18 m

Moment @ base MTT = 47.45 tm

p2p1

ASOM PWRD AXOM MALA PROJECT

Feedback Infra Pvt. Ltd. Design of Abutment

p2p1
SUMMERY OF ACTIVE EARTH PRESSURE : Dynamic Increment/Decrement
Static forces Seismic Downward Seismic Upward
Loads HL MTT HL MTT HL MTT
LWL CONDITION
Active earth pressure 197.48 642.67 71.67 280.94 34.02 116.30
Surcharge pressure 54.17 236.98 21.94 122.32 9.16 47.45

ASOM PWRD AXOM MALA PROJECT

Feedback Infra Pvt. Ltd. Design of Abutment

DESIGN OF ABUTMENTS ULS CASE

The GA of abutment is as below (All Dimensions in mm) Total Width of Abutment = 12.00 m
300 Cut out for span = 25.00 m
Surcharge load 300 Exp. Joint RL 64.700
Approach Slab 300

300
Tr. Moment from Superstructure

Girder and slab

7
= In table below

300
8

height
2110
6
P = In table below
300 CL of Bearing
300 750 570

1560
Hzl. Force = In table below
Bearing and

350
Pedestal height

400
400
270 HFL RL 61.022 scour depth in abut = 1.27dsm =
4
3

5539 mm
600
5
1

600
2

Formation Level
12

3079 mm

Overall Height
600

above GL to
750

7715 mm
11
RL 59.161 Ground Level
13

1 1.950 m 500
14

900 RL 58.661
1800 mm 1800 mm
10 1800
9
0 mm RL 56.86
A
Pile diameter
1.20 m Φ 1.20 m Φ 3554 mm
1.80 m 1.80 m RL 53.307 SCOUR
0.75 m 0.75 m
5.1

ASOM PWRD AXOM MALA PROJECT

Feedback Infra Pvt. Ltd. Design of Abutment

DESIGN DATA
a) SOIL DATA
Total Area = 5.5637
Density of Soil Fill = 2.00 t/m3 above pile cap
Angle of Internal Friction = f = 30 º
Surcharge Angle = b = 0º
Wall Angle = a = 90 º
Angle of Wall Friction = d = 20 º Surcharge Height = 1.20 m
Friction Coefficient = m = 0.50

sin2 (a + f ) cosd 1
Normal: Ka = x = 0.279
sin2 a sin(a - d ) é sin(f + d ) sin(f - b ) ù
2

ê1 + ú
ê
ë sin(a - d ) sin(a + b ) ú
û

slope of earth fill (ς) = 0.00

Long horizontal seismic coefficient (αh) = 0.180
Long vertical seismic coefficient (αv) = 0.120
Trans vertical seismic coefficient (αv) = 0.360
Trans horizontal seismic coefficient (αh) = 0.540
Wall angle (alpha ') = 0.00 º
λ = 11.57 º

b) CONCRETE DATA
Density of Concrete = 2.5 t/m3
Grade of Concrete = M 35

ASOM PWRD AXOM MALA PROJECT

Feedback Infra Pvt. Ltd. Design of Abutment

Normal Case:

P1 = 4.049 T

P1 = 10.189 T 7.839 m

4.820 m
4.336 m GL

3.374t/m

Pilecap base 1.800 m A

4.380t/m
0.671t/m
P2 19.0960 2.383 T 3.55 m
#####

6.366t/m Scour Level

LOAD CALCULATION FOR NET LOADS AT A

OVERTURNING LOADS (PER RUNNING M OF WALL) UPTO PILECAP TOP
Total Horizontal Load due to Earth Pressure = 10.189 T At Lever arm = 2.54 m
Total Horizontal Load due to Surcharge Pressure = 4.049 T At Lever arm = 3.02 m
Hence, Total Horizontal Load = 170.859 T
Total Overturning Moment = 456.84 t-m

ASOM PWRD AXOM MALA PROJECT

Feedback Infra Pvt. Ltd. Design of Abutment

OVERTURNING LOADS OF PILECAP BOTTOM

Total Horizontal Load due to Earth Pressure = 30.977 T At Lever arm = 0.90 m
Total Horizontal Load due to Earth Pressure -triangle = 4.617 T At Lever arm = 0.76 m
Total Horizontal Load due to Surcharge Pressure = 6.155 T At Lever arm = 0.90 m
Total Horizobntal load - all loads upto pilecap bottom = 269.092 T
Total Overturning moment of all loads upto pile cap bottom = 925.51 t-m
Total Horizobntal load - all loads upto pilecap bottom = 240.068 T
Total Overturning moment of all loads upto pile cap bottom = 1388.78 t-m

Seismic Case:

P1 = 4.049 T

P1 = 10.189 T 7.839 m

3.020 m
2.536 m GL

3.374t/m

Pilecap base 1.800 m A

4.380t/m
0.671t/m
3.55 m
Scour Level

ASOM PWRD AXOM MALA PROJECT

Feedback Infra Pvt. Ltd. Design of Abutment

LOAD CALCULATION FOR NET LOADS AT A

OVERTURNING LOADS (PER RUNNING M OF WALL) UPTO PILECAP TOP
Total Horizontal Load due to Earth Pressure = 10.189 T At Lever arm = 2.54 m
Total Horizontal Load due to Surcharge Pressure = 4.049 T At Lever arm = 3.02 m
Hence, Total Horizontal Load = 170.859 T
Total Overturning Moment = 456.84 t-m

OVERTURNING LOADS OF PILECAP

Total Horizontal Load due to Earth Pressure = 17.168 T At Lever arm = 3.29 m

Total Horizontal Load due to Surcharge Pressure = 5.256 T At Lever arm = 3.92 m
Total Horizobntal load - all loads upto pilecap bottom = 269.092 T
Total Overturning moment of all loads upto pile cap bottom = 925.51 t-m

STABILISING LOADS:
Long Trans TransHori
Vertical
Vertical HZL. Dist. From Vertical Horizontal Horizontal Horizont zontal
Area No. Width Description Length Height Density Moment at A seismic Factor
Load A seismic seismic seismic al seismic
moment
moment seismic moment
1 12.00 m Vertical Wall 0.600 3.579 2.500 86.970 2.550 221.773 10.436 26.613 15.655 56.192 46.9636 168.576 1.35
1a 12.00 m Vertical Wall 0.300 2.579 2.500 15.667 2.150 33.682 1.880 4.042 2.820 10.123 8.46041 30.369 1.35
2 12.00 m Dirtwall Haunch 0.750 0.600 2.500 9.113 3.100 28.249 1.094 3.390 1.640 7.839 4.92075 23.516 1.35
3 12.00 m Dirtwall Haunch 0.750 0.400 2.500 12.150 3.225 39.184 1.458 4.702 2.187 11.326 6.561 33.979 1.35
4 12.00 m Corbel for bearing 0.270 0.400 2.500 4.374 2.115 9.251 0.525 1.110 0.787 4.078 2.36196 12.233 1.35
5 12.00 m Corbel for bearing 0.270 0.600 2.500 3.281 2.160 7.086 0.394 0.850 0.590 2.822 1.77147 8.466 1.35
6 12.00 m Dirtwall 0.300 2.460 2.500 29.889 3.450 103.117 3.587 12.374 5.380 34.750 16.1401 104.249 1.35
7 12.00 m Approach slab corbel 0.300 0.300 2.500 3.645 3.750 13.669 0.437 1.640 0.656 4.848 1.9683 14.544 1.35
8 12.00 m Approach slab corbel 0.300 0.300 2.500 1.823 3.700 6.743 0.219 0.809 0.328 2.342 0.98415 7.026 1.35
9 12.30 m Heel of pilecap 2.250 1.800 2.500 168.126 3.975 668.299 20.175 80.196 30.263 27.236 90.7878 81.709 1.35
10 12.30 m Toe of pile cap 1.950 1.800 2.500 145.709 0.975 142.066 17.485 17.048 26.228 23.605 78.6828 70.815 1.35
11 11.30 m Soil Fill on heel 0.750 2.579 2.000 65.571 3.225 211.467 7.869 25.376 0.000 0.000 23.6056 72.929 1.5
12 11.30 m Soil Fill on heel 0.750 0.600 2.000 7.628 3.100 23.645 0.915 2.837 0.000 0.000 2.7459 12.573 1.5
13 11.30 m Soil Fill on heel 1.500 6.039 2.000 307.083 3.975 1220.656 36.850 146.479 0.000 0.000 110.55 532.795 1.5
14 12.30 m soil fill on toe 1.950 0.500 2.000 35.978 0.975 35.078 4.317 4.209 0.000 0.000 12.9519 26.551 1.5
15 12.30 m Reduce area 7 & 8 2.000 -6.561 - -16.330 -0.787 -1.960 -1.181 -3.5429 - 1.5
16 12.30 m VC normal of EP 146.912 2.850 418.699 - - - - 1.5
17 12.30 m VC seismic of EP 146.912 2.850 418.699 17.629 50.244 - - 1.5
18 0.50 m Retaining wall Load 2.250 6.039 2.500 22.929 3.525 80.826 2.752 9.699 4.127 19.891 12.3818 59.674 1.35

ASOM PWRD AXOM MALA PROJECT

Feedback Infra Pvt. Ltd. Design of Abutment

Normal 1060.28 3247.16

Total Stabilising Loads N-Seismic Part 1060.28 3247.16
Seismic
Seismic Part 0.00 0.00 127.23 389.66 89.48 205.05 418.295 1260.005

Hence, Stabilising Horizontal Load = 530.142 T e = 3.06 m

Stabilising Moment = 3247.16 t-m
STABILISING LOADS: HFL CASE

Vertical HZL. Dist. From

Area No. Width Description Length Height Density Moment at A
Load A

1 12.00 m Vertical Wall up to HFL 0.600 1.218 2.500 29.597 2.550 75.473
1 12.00 m Vertical Wall below HFL 0.600 2.361 1.500 34.423 2.550 87.780
1a 12.00 m Vertical Wall up to HFL 0.300 0.218 2.500 1.324 2.150 2.847
1a 12.00 m Vertical Wall below HFL 0.300 2.361 1.500 8.606 2.150 18.501
3 12.00 m Dirtwall Haunch 0.750 0.600 2.500 18.225 3.100 56.498
4 12.00 m Dirtwall Haunch 0.750 0.400 2.500 12.150 3.225 39.184
5 12.00 m Corbel for bearing 0.270 0.400 2.500 2.187 2.115 4.626
6 12.00 m Corbel for bearing 0.270 0.600 2.500 6.561 2.160 14.172
7 12.00 m Dirtwall 0.300 2.460 2.500 29.889 3.450 103.117
8 12.00 m Approach slab corbel 0.300 0.300 2.500 1.823 3.750 6.834
9 12.00 m Approach slab corbel 0.300 0.300 2.500 3.645 3.700 13.487
10 12.30 m Heel of pilecap 2.250 1.800 1.500 100.875 3.975 400.980
11 12.30 m Toe of pile cap 1.950 1.800 1.500 97.139 0.975 94.711
12 12.30 m Soil Fill on heel above HFL 0.750 0.218 2.000 3.017 3.225 9.728
13 12.30 m Soil Fill on heel below HFL 0.750 2.361 1.000 32.670 3.225 105.362
14 11.30 m Soil Fill on heel 0.750 0.600 2.000 15.255 3.225 49.197
15 11.30 m Soil Fill on heel above HFL 1.500 1.218 2.000 61.935 3.975 246.193
16 11.30 m Soil Fill on heel below HFL 1.500 2.361 1.000 60.028 3.975 238.613
17 12.30 m soil fill on toe 1.950 0.500 2.000 35.978 0.975 35.078
18 12.30 m Reduce area 7 & 8 2.000 -6.561 - -16.257
19 12.30 m VC normal of EP 131.067 2.850 373.540
20 12.30 m Retaining wall Load above HFL 2.250 1.218 2.500 113.765 3.525 401.022
21 12.30 m Retaining wall Load below HFL 2.250 2.361 1.500 132.315 3.525 466.410
Total Stabilising Loads Normal 925.91 2827.09
Normal Case:
Final Loads and Bending Moments at the centre of base are as below
Total Vertical Load = 1060.285 T
Total Moment = -1856.2 t-m Against OTM

ASOM PWRD AXOM MALA PROJECT

Feedback Infra Pvt. Ltd. Design of Abutment

SUMMARY OF LOADS AT CENTRE OF BASE FOR ENTIRE WIDTH OF ABUTMENTS SKEW ANGLE= 0
Horizontal Horizontal Transverse
Sl. No. Description Vertical Load Long. Moment
load-long. load-trans. moment
1 Overturning & stabilsing loads 1060.28 403.64 0.00
2 Dead loads from superstructure
Girder+Deck slab 272.15 0.00
SIDL 27.84 0.00
WC 34.41 0.00
Live loads (Max load) 179.42 170.44 0.00
(Max Long Moment) 173.33 129.99 0.00
(Max Trans Moment) 113.52 129.99 0.00
Braking loads 8.72 43.88 0.00 236.06 0.00
Totals 1582.82 447.52 0.00 236.06 0.00

Seismic Case:
Final Loads and Bending Moments at the centre of base are as below
Total Vertical Load = 1060.285 T
Total Moment = -2318.9 t-m Against OTM

SKEW ANGLE= 0
SUMMARY OF LOADS AT CENTRE OF BASE FOR ENTIRE WIDTH OF ABUTMENTS
Horizontal Horizontal Transverse
Sl. No. Description Vertical Load Long. Moment
load-long. load-trans. moment
1 Overturning & stabilsing loads 1060.28 269.09 0.00
2 Dead loads from superstructure
Girder+Deck slab 272.15 0.00
SIDL 27.84 0.00
TRAFFIC DIRECTION
WC 34.41 0.00
3 Live loads (Max load) 23.92 0.00 22.73 Θ
(Max Long Moment) 23.92 0.00 22.73
(Max Trans Moment) 15.14 0.00 44.65
Braking loads 0.46 3.49 31.47 Considering 20% of live load and braking
1 for design of foundation as per irc 6
4 Seismic (Horizontal-long) 172.66 341.93 0 1421.99 0 (increase in seismic force)
5 Seismic (Horizontal-trans) 510.86 0 644.04 0 2460.94 1 Load Factor in Transverse direction
Long+0.3*Trans+0.3*vertical 325.92 341.93 193.21 1421.99 738.28 (refer IRC 6 2017, 219.7)
Totals Comb
0.3*Long+Trans+0.3*vertical 562.66 102.58 644.04 426.60 2460.94
0.3*Long+0.3*Trans+vertical 205.06 102.58 193.21 426.60 738.28

ASOM PWRD AXOM MALA PROJECT

Feedback Infra Pvt. Ltd. Design of Abutment

1.35DL+1.35SIDL+1.75 WC+0.2LL+0.2Breaking+1.5Seismic
1624.13 375.16 193.21 432.89 747.21
Vertical

1.35DL+1.35SIDL+0.2Breaking+1.5Seismic Long 1744.99 614.51 193.21 1428.28 747.21

1.35DL+1.35SIDL+0.2LL+0.2Breaking+1.5Seismic Trans 1981.73 375.16 644.04 432.89 2469.87

HFl Case:
Final Loads and Bending Moments at the centre of base are as below
Total Vertical Load = 925.914 T
Total Moment = -1436.0 t-m Against OTM

SUMMARY OF LOADS AT CENTRE OF BASE FOR ENTIRE WIDTH OF ABUTMENTS

Horizontal Horizontal Transverse

Sl. No. Description Vertical Load Long. Moment
load-long. load-trans. moment

1 Overturning & stabilsing loads 925.91 403.64 0.00

2 Dead loads from superstructure
Girder+Deck slab 272.15 0.00
SIDL 27.84 0.00
WC 34.41 0.00
Live loads (Max load) 179.42 170.44 0.00
(Max Long Moment) 173.33 129.99 0.00
(Max Trans Moment) 173.33 129.99 0.00
Braking loads 8.72 43.88 0.00 236.06 0.00
Totals 1448.44 447.52 236.06 0.00

ASOM PWRD AXOM MALA PROJECT

Feedback Infra Pvt. Ltd. Design of Abutment

PILE LOAD CALCULATIONS

Providing the following arrangement of piles
dia of piles : 1.20 m Ø
spacing of piles : 1.8 m c/c
No. of piles : 8

Vertical Horizonta Horizonta Long. Transver

Applied Load kN Case
Load l load- l load- Moment se
X Y Xi^2 yi^2 Normal HFL Seismic 1 Seismic 2 Seismic3 Normal 1582.82 447.52 0.00 236.06 0.00
1 -1.8 5.4 3 29.16 181 165 204 150 321 HFL 1448.44 447.52 0.00 236.06 0.00
2 -1.8 1.8 3 3.24 181 165 183 129 252 Seismic 1 1624.13 375.16 193.21 432.89 747.21
3 -1.8 -1.8 3 3.24 181 165 163 109 183 Seismic 2 1744.99 614.51 193.21 1428.28 747.21
4 -1.8 -5.4 3 29.16 181 165 142 88 115 Seismic3 1981.73 375.16 644.04 432.89 2469.87
5 1.8 5.4 3 29.16 214 197 264 348 381 N 8
6 1.8 1.8 3 3.24 214 197 243 328 312
7 1.8 -1.8 3 3.24 214 197 223 307 243 Total Ixx = 26
8 1.8 -5.4 3 29.16 214 197 202 286 175 Total Iyy = 130
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
Total 25.92 129.6

ASOM PWRD AXOM MALA PROJECT

Feedback Infra Pvt. Ltd. Design of Abutment

Seismic force due to pile weight (Clause 4.7 IRC SP-114-2018)

Seismic (Horizontal-long) Seismic (Horizontal-trans)

Locations Levels length Wt of pile Lever arm
Coeffecient Moment Coeffecient Moment
Upto scour 53.307 3.554 10.0 7.971 0.180 14.418 0.540 43.3
Scour level
47.113 6.194 17.5 3.097 0.171 9.259 0.51 27.8
to fixity level
Combinations
Long+0.3*Trans+0.3*vertical 44.99 t.m
0.3*Long+Trans+0.3*vertical 78.13 t.m
0.3*Long+0.3*Trans+vertical 28.41 t.m

Horizontal Load Case

Case Moment in pile Load Case 1 Load Case 2 Load Case 3 Load Case 4
load per pile 5
Normal 55.94 218.13 Total load in row 1 726 659 692 476 871
HFL 55.94 218.13 Total load in row 2 857 790 932 1269 1111
Seismic 1 52.75 234.09 Total load in row 3 0 0 0 0 0
Seismic 2 80.52 358.96 Total load in row 4 0 0 0 0 0
Seismic3 93.17 441.42

Normal Case
Max. Load on pile from distribution = 214.245 t
Min. Load on pile from distribution = 164.663 t
Seismic Case
Max. Load on pile from distribution = 380.690 t
Min. Load on pile from distribution = 87.804 t
Design of Pile & Pile Cap - ULS

-1.8, 5.4 1.8, 5.4

-1.8, 1.8 1.8, 1.8

Origin

-1.8, -1.8 1.8, -1.8

-1.8, -5.4 1.8, -5.4

ROW 1 ROW 2 ROW 3

SECTION A SECTION A

ASOM PWRD AXOM MALA PROJECT

Feedback Infra Pvt. Ltd. Design of Abutment

SECTION A
Materials
Grade of Concrete, fck = M 35
Grade of Steel, fyk = Fe 500

Load Case Load Case

Load Case 1 2 Load Case 3 Load Case 4 5
Total load in row 1 725.84 658.65 691.82 475.75 870.62
Total load in row 2 856.98 789.79 932.31 1269.24 1111.11
Total load in row 3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total load in row 4 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

ASOM PWRD AXOM MALA PROJECT

Feedback Infra Pvt. Ltd. Design of Abutment

0.90
1.715

0.00
1.80
0.75 0.75

5.10
SECTION A-A

Width of pile cap = 12.00 m

Depth of Pile Cap = 1.80 m
Pile shall be embeded in Pile cap = 50 mm
Clear Cover for Reinforcement = 75 mm As per amendment 2015 to IRC 112
Dia of Rebar Long. Direction = 20 mm Density of Concrete 2.5 t/m2
Dia of Rebar Transverse Direction = 20 mm Density of Soil 2 t/m2
Effe. Depth of pile cap, deff = 1715 mm
Height of soil over cap = 0.50 m
Length of Heel = 1.95 m
Length of Toe = 2.25 m
Design of Pile Cap in Longitudinal Direction
DL Backfill
Bending Moment due to weight of pile cap & soil at pier face = 37.5 tm 1.35 1.5
Shear force due to pile cap weight at critical section = 75.9 t
Total Load on Pile in one col = 1269.2 t t
Lever arm for bending moment due to Pile = 1.80 0
Bending Moment in Long. Dir. due to Pile = 1567.1 tm
Bending Moment per m at crtical section = 130.59 tm/m
Net Bending moment at the face of pier = 1529.59 tm
Total Shear Force at critical section = 1269.2 t
Shear force per m at crtical section = t/m
Net Shear force at critical section = 1193.3 t

ASOM PWRD AXOM MALA PROJECT

Feedback Infra Pvt. Ltd. Design of Abutment

Design for Moment ULS Case 1-ML Reference

Design Constants Characteristic Comp. Cube Strength, mpa f ck 35 IRC 112-2011
Characteristic yield strength of steel,mpa f yk 500
Modulus of Elasticity of Steel, mpa Es 2.0E+05
Mean value of Conc. Cube Comp. Strength f cm 45 Eq. A2- 1
Secant Modulus of Elasticity of Conc., mpa E cm 32308.2 Eq. A2- 5
Modulus of Elasticity of conc(with creep) E c, eff 16154.1
Effective Modular ratio ae= E s / E c,eff 12.4 Cl. 12.4.2 (2), Eq. 12.15
Creep coefficient f 1.00 Cl. 6.4.2.7
Material factor Steel gs 1.15 Cl. 6.2.2. Notes(1)
Concrete gm 1.50 Cl. 6.4.2.8
Coeff. to consider influence of conc. Strength,alpha a 0.67 Cl. 6.4.2.8
Effective ht. factor of comp. zone, l 0.80 A2.9, Eq A2-33
Effective strength factor, h 1.00 A2.9, Eq A2-35
Ultimate compressive strain Concrete e cu3 0.0035 Table 6.5
Steel es 0.00217 cl.6.2.2
Design comp strength, mpa f cd = α f ck / g m 15.63 Cl. 6.4.2.8
Design strength of steel, mpa f yd = f yk / g s 434.78 cl.6.2.2
Factored design Moment, tm Mu 1529.6
Width of the cap, mm b 12000.0
Depth of cap, mm D 1800.0
Tension Reinforcement Spacing of Bars 160
Dia. of Rebars, mm f 20
Area of Steel, mm2 A sl 23562
Clear cover, mm C 75
Effective depth, mm deff 1715.0
X umax / d = 0.0035 / (0.0055 + 0.87 fy / Es) 0.456

ASOM PWRD AXOM MALA PROJECT

Feedback Infra Pvt. Ltd. Design of Abutment

Case 1-ML
Q lim =0.36 f ck X umax /d (1-0.42*Xu max/ d) 4.645
Effective depth required d req =Sqrt (Mu lim / Q lim b) 523.8
Safe
Compression Reinforcement Spacing of Bars 160
Dia. of Rebars, mm f 16
Area of Steel, mm2 Asc 15072.0
Effective cover, mm d' 83.0

Depth of Neutral axis, mm, ytop x =(A sl f yd )/( l η b f cd ) 68.26

Lever arm z, mm  f yd As 
d
1 − 2hf bd 

 cd  1687.70
Moment of Resistance, Mr,tm Mr =A sl .f yd .z 1728.9
Safe

Min Reinforcement Tensile Streingth of Concrete f ctm 2.77

0.26f ctm /f yk bd 29657
0.0013bd 26754

Design for Shear ULS Case 1-ML Shear as per -Cl.10.3.2

Shear force due to superstructure, t V 596.7
Torsion, tm T 0.0
Total Design Shear Force, t V ED 596.7
Shear Resistance WithoutShear Reinforcement., t V Rd.c 586.4
Shear Resistance With Shear Reinforcement., t V Rd.s 1059.9
Shear Resistance of Concrete, t Safe
Area of Steel, mm2 A sl 23561.9
Width of the cap, mm bw 12000
Effective depth, mm d 1715.0
f ck 35
f yk 500
K =1 + √(200/d) < = 2 1.34 Eq. 10.2
Strength reduction factor shear n min = 0.031 k3/2 f ck 1/2 0.28 Eq. 10.3
Axial force in structure, t N ED 0.00
Conc.comp.stress at CG axis s cp =N ED / A c < 0.2 f cd 0.000
0.2 f cd 3.127
Reinforcement ratio ρ1 =A sl / b w d < 0.02 0.00114 Cl.10.3.1, fig 10.5
V Rd.c =[0.12 K (80 ρ1 f ck )0.33+0.15 σ cp ] b w d 486.6 Eq. 10.1
V Rd.Cmin =(v min + 0.15 σ cp ) b w d 586.4
V Rd,C 586.4
Shear Strriup requirement Yes

ASOM PWRD AXOM MALA PROJECT

Feedback Infra Pvt. Ltd. Design of Abutment

ASOM PWRD AXOM MALA PROJECT

Feedback Infra Pvt. Ltd. Design of Abutment

2d 2d
Punching Shear Reistance vRd = 0.12K(80ρ 1 f ck )
1/3
≥ v min
a a

VED,red = Net Applied Force = 305 t For corner Pile

u = Basic Control Perimeter = 8387.8 mm
d = Effective depth at section considered = 1715 mm
a = Distance of Control Perimeter considered = 3430.0 mm
ρ1 = Reinforcement Ratio = 0.00114
v = 0.6 [1-fck/310] = 0.532 MPa
K = 1+√(200/d) = 1.341
v Rd.max = Maximum Punching Shear Resistance = 4.160 MPa
v min. = 0.031K3/2fck1/2 = 0.285 MPa ######### 4.030
v ed = Punching Shear Stress = 0.212 MPa
Safe in Punching Shear
v Rd. = Punching Shear Resistance = 0.073 MPa
= Punching Shear Resistance = 0.285 MPa
v Rd..c = Design Punching Shear Resistance without = 0.285 MPa
Punching Shear Reinforcement > Actual Punching Shear, Hence OK

Surface Reinforcement As per clause 16.5.4 IRC 112 2011

Act ext = 0.01*Act ext = 1237.5 mm2
Provided = 12 dia 140 c/c 12 Nos Okay
Area = 1303.85 mm2

ASOM PWRD AXOM MALA PROJECT

Feedback Infra Pvt. Ltd. Design of Abutment

DESIGN OF ABUTMENTS QUASI CASE

The GA of abutment is as below (All Dimensions in mm) Total Width of Abutment = 12.00 m
300 Cut out for span = 25.00 m
Surcharge load 300 Exp. Joint RL 64.700
Approach Slab 300 6.039

300
Tr. Moment from Superstructure

Girder and slab

7
= In table below

300
8

height
2110
6
P = In table below
300 CL of Bearing
300 750 570

1560
Hzl. Force = In table below 61.24
Bearing

350
and

400
400
270 HF
RL 61.022
4
3

5539 mm
600
5
1
600
2

12

3079 mm

Formation Level
Overall Height
600

above GL to
750

7715 mm
11
RL 59.161 Ground Level
13

1.950 m 500
14

900 RL 58.661
1800 mm 1800 mm
10 1800
0 mm RL 56.86
9
A
Pile diameter
1.20 m Φ 1.20 m Φ 3554 mm
1.80 m 1.80 m RL 53.307 SCOUR
0.75 m 0.75 m
5.1

ASOM PWRD AXOM MALA PROJECT

Feedback Infra Pvt. Ltd. Design of Abutment

DESIGN DATA
a) SOIL DATA
Assumed SBC = 15.00 t/m² Total Area = 4.1213
Density of Soil Fill = 2.00 t/m3 above pile cap
Angle of Internal Friction = f = 30 º
Surcharge Angle = b = 0º
Wall Angle = a = 90 º
Angle of Wall Friction = d = 20 º Surcharge Height = 1.20 m
Friction Coefficient = m = 0.50

sin2 (a + f ) cosd 1
Normal: Ka = x = 0.279
sin2 a sin(a - d ) é sin(f + d ) sin(f - b ) ù
2

ê1 + ú
ê
ë sin(a - d ) sin(a + b ) ú
û

slope of earth fill (ς) = 0.00

Long horizontal seismic coefficient (αh) = 0.180
Long vertical seismic coefficient (αv) = 0.120
Trans vertical seismic coefficient (αv) = 0.360
Trans horizontal seismic coefficient (αh) = 0.540
Wall angle (alpha ') = 0.00 º
λ = 11.57 º
b) CONCRETE DATA
Density of Concrete = 2.5 t/m3
Grade of Concrete = M 35

ASOM PWRD AXOM MALA PROJECT

Feedback Infra Pvt. Ltd. Design of Abutment

Normal Case:

P1 = 4.05 T

P1 = 10.189 T 7.839 m

4.820 m
4.336 m GL

3.374t/m

Pilecap base 1.800 m A

4.380t/m
0.67t/m
P2 19.0960 2.383 T 3.55 m
1.67 m

6.366t/m Scour Level

LOAD CALCULATION FOR NET LOADS AT A

OVERTURNING LOADS (PER RUNNING M OF WALL) UPTO PILECAP TOP
Total Horizontal Load due to Earth Pressure = 10.189 T At Lever arm = 2.54 m
Total Horizontal Load due to Surcharge Pressure = 4.049 T At Lever arm = 3.02 m
Hence, Total Horizontal Load = 170.859 T
Total Overturning Moment = 456.84 t-m

ASOM PWRD AXOM MALA PROJECT

Feedback Infra Pvt. Ltd. Design of Abutment

OVERTURNING LOADS OF PILECAP BOTTOM

Total Horizontal Load due to Earth Pressure = 30.977 T At Lever arm = 0.90 m
Total Horizontal Load due to Earth Pressure -triangle = 4.617 T At Lever arm = 0.76 m
Total Horizontal Load due to Surcharge Pressure = 6.155 T At Lever arm = 0.90 m
Total Horizobntal load - all loads upto pilecap bottom = 269.092 T
Total Overturning moment of all loads upto pile cap bottom = 925.51 t-m
FOR HFL CASE
Total Horizobntal load - all loads upto pilecap bottom = 240.068 T
Total Overturning moment of all loads upto pile cap bottom = 1388.78 t-m

Seismic Case:

P1 = 4.049 T

P1 = 10.189 T 7.839 m

3.020 m
2.536 m GL

3.374t/m

Pilecap base 1.800 m A

4.380t/m
0.67t/m
3.55 m

ASOM PWRD AXOM MALA PROJECT

Feedback Infra Pvt. Ltd. Design of Abutment

LOAD CALCULATION FOR NET LOADS AT A

OVERTURNING LOADS (PER RUNNING M OF WALL) UPTO PILECAP TOP
Total Horizontal Load due to Earth Pressure = 10.189 T At Lever arm = 2.54 m
Total Horizontal Load due to Surcharge Pressure = 4.049 T At Lever arm = 3.02 m
Hence, Total Horizontal Load = 170.859 T
Total Overturning Moment = 456.84 t-m

OVERTURNING LOADS OF PILECAP

Total Horizontal Load due to Earth Pressure = 17.168 T At Lever arm = 3.29 m

Total Horizontal Load due to Surcharge Pressure = 5.256 T At Lever arm = 3.92 m
Total Horizobntal load - all loads upto pilecap bottom = 269.092 T
Total Overturning moment of all loads upto pile cap bottom = 925.51 t-m

STABILISING LOADS:
Long Trans TransHor
HZL. Vertical
Moment Vertical Horizontal Horizontal Horizont izontal
Area No. Width Description Length Height Density Vertical Load Dist. seismic Factor
at A seismic seismic seismic al seismic
From A moment
moment seismic moment
1 12.00 m Vertical Wall 0.600 3.579 2.500 64.422 2.550 164.276 7.731 19.713 11.596 41.624 34.7879 124.871 1
1a 12.00 m Vertical Wall 0.300 2.579 2.500 11.606 2.150 24.950 1.393 2.994 2.089 7.498 6.26697 22.495 1
2 12.00 m Dirtwall Haunch 0.750 0.600 2.500 6.750 3.100 20.925 0.810 2.511 1.215 5.806 3.645 17.419 1
3 12.00 m Dirtwall Haunch 0.750 0.400 2.500 9.000 3.225 29.025 1.080 3.483 1.620 8.390 4.86 25.170 1
4 12.00 m Corbel for bearing 0.270 0.400 2.500 3.240 2.115 6.853 0.389 0.822 0.583 3.020 1.7496 9.061 1
5 12.00 m Corbel for bearing 0.270 0.600 2.500 2.430 2.160 5.249 0.292 0.630 0.437 2.090 1.3122 6.271 1
6 12.00 m Dirtwall 0.300 2.460 2.500 22.140 3.450 76.383 2.657 9.166 3.985 25.740 11.9556 77.221 1
7 12.00 m Approach slab corbel 0.300 0.300 2.500 2.700 3.750 10.125 0.324 1.215 0.486 3.591 1.458 10.773 1
8 12.00 m Approach slab corbel 0.300 0.300 2.500 1.350 3.700 4.995 0.162 0.599 0.243 1.735 0.729 5.204 1
9 12.30 m Heel of pilecap 2.550 1.800 2.500 141.143 3.975 561.041 16.937 67.325 25.406 22.865 76.217 68.595 1
10 12.30 m Toe of pile cap 2.550 1.800 2.500 141.143 0.975 137.614 16.937 16.514 25.406 22.865 76.217 68.595 1
11 12.30 m Soil Fill on heel 0.750 2.579 2.000 47.583 3.225 153.454 5.710 18.414 8.565 26.461 25.6946 79.383 1
12 12.30 m Soil Fill on heel 0.750 0.600 2.000 5.535 3.100 17.159 0.664 2.059 0.996 4.562 2.9889 13.686 1
13 12.30 m Soil Fill on heel 1.500 6.039 2.000 222.839 3.975 885.785 26.741 106.294 40.111 193.315 120.333 579.945 1
14 12.30 m soil fill on toe 1.950 0.500 2.000 23.985 0.975 23.385 2.878 2.806 4.317 8.850 12.9519 26.551 1
15 12.30 m Reduce area 7 & 8 2.000 -3.240 - -12.096 -0.389 -1.452 -0.583 -1.7496 - 1
16 12.30 m VC normal of EP 97.941 2.850 279.133 - - - - 1
17 12.30 m VC seismic of EP 97.941 2.850 279.133 11.753 33.496 - - 1
18 0.50 m Retaining wall Load 2.250 6.039 2.500 16.985 3.525 59.871 2.038 7.185 3.057 14.734 9.17173 44.203 1
Total Stabilising Loads Normal 817.55 2448.13

ASOM PWRD AXOM MALA PROJECT

Feedback Infra Pvt. Ltd. Design of Abutment

STABILISING LOADS: HFL CASE

HZL.
Moment
Area No. Width Description Length Height Density Vertical Load Dist. Factor
at A
From A

1 12.00 m Vertical Wall up to HFL 0.600 1.218 2.500 21.924 2.550 55.906 1
1 12.00 m Vertical Wall below HFL 0.600 2.361 1.500 25.499 2.550 65.022 1
1a 12.00 m Vertical Wall up to HFL 0.300 0.218 2.500 0.981 2.150 2.109 1
1a 12.00 m Vertical Wall below HFL 0.300 2.361 1.500 6.375 2.150 13.704 1
2 12.00 m Dirtwall Haunch 0.750 0.600 2.500 13.500 3.100 41.850 1
3 12.00 m Dirtwall Haunch 0.750 0.400 2.500 9.000 3.225 29.025 1
4 12.00 m Corbel for bearing 0.270 0.400 2.500 1.620 2.115 3.426 1
5 12.00 m Corbel for bearing 0.270 0.600 2.500 4.860 2.160 10.498 1
6 12.00 m Dirtwall 0.300 2.460 2.500 22.140 3.450 76.383 1
7 12.00 m Approach slab corbel 0.300 0.300 2.500 1.350 3.750 5.063 1
8 12.00 m Approach slab corbel 0.300 0.300 2.500 2.700 3.700 9.990 1
9 12.30 m Heel of pilecap 2.550 1.800 1.500 84.686 3.975 336.625 1
10 12.30 m Toe of pile cap 2.550 1.800 1.500 84.686 0.975 82.568 1
11 12.30 m Soil Fill on heel above HFL 0.750 0.218 2.000 2.011 3.225 6.486 1
11 12.30 m Soil Fill on heel below HFL 0.750 2.361 1.000 21.780 3.225 70.241 1
11 12.30 m Soil Fill on heel 0.750 0.600 2.000 11.070 3.225 35.701 1
11 12.30 m Soil Fill on heel above HFL 1.500 1.218 2.000 44.944 3.975 178.653 1
11 12.30 m Soil Fill on heel below HFL 1.500 2.361 1.000 43.560 3.975 173.153 1
14 12.30 m soil fill on toe 1.950 0.500 2.000 23.985 0.975 23.385 1
15 12.30 m Reduce area 7 & 8 2.000 -3.240 - -12.042 1
16 12.30 m VC normal of EP 87.378 2.850 249.027 1
18 12.30 m Retaining wall Load above HFL2.250 1.218 2.500 84.270 3.525 297.053 1
18 12.30 m Retaining wall Load below HFL2.250 2.361 1.500 98.011 3.525 345.489 1
Total Stabilising Loads Normal 693.09 2099.31
Normal Case:
Final Loads and Bending Moments at the centre of base are as below
Total Vertical Load = 817.550 T
Total Moment = -1520.5 t-m Against OTM

ASOM PWRD AXOM MALA PROJECT

Feedback Infra Pvt. Ltd. Design of Abutment

SUMMARY OF LOADS AT CENTRE OF BASE FOR ENTIRE WIDTH OF ABUTMENTS

Transver
Vertical Horizontal load- Horizontal Long.
Sl. No. Description se
Load long. load-trans. Moment
moment
1 Overturning & stabilsing loads 817.55 269.09 0.00
2 Dead loads from superstructure
Girder 201.59 0.00
Slab loads 0.00 0.00
SIDL 40.29 0.00
Live loads (Max load) 0.00 0.00 0.00
(Max Long Moment) 0.00 0.00 0.00
(Max Trans Moment) 0.00 0.00 0.00
Braking loads 0.00 29.26 157.37
Totals 1059.43 298.35 157.37 0.00

HFl Case:
Final Loads and Bending Moments at the centre of base are as below
Total Vertical Load = 693.090 T
Total Moment = -708.8 t-m Against OTM

SUMMARY OF LOADS AT CENTRE OF BASE FOR ENTIRE WIDTH OF ABUTMENTS

Transver
Vertical Horizontal load- Horizontal Long.
Sl. No. Description se
Load long. load-trans. Moment
moment
1 Overturning & stabilsing loads 693.09 269.09 0.00
2 Dead loads from superstructure
Girder 201.59 0.00
Slab loads 0.00 0.00
SIDL 40.29 0.00
Live loads (Max load) 0.00 0.00 0.00
(Max Long Moment) 0.00 0.00 0.00
(Max Trans Moment) 0.00 0.00 0.00
Braking loads 0.00 29.26 0.00
Totals 934.97 298.35 0.00 0.00

PILE LOAD CALCULATIONS

Providing the following arrangement of piles
dia of piles : 1.20 m Ø Projection of pilecap beyond pile = 150 mm
spacing of piles : 1.8 m c/c std for clayey = 3.77 m c/c Total length of pile = 25.00 m
min for sandy = 3.60 m c/c Pile cap thickness = 1.80 m
No. of piles : 8

ASOM PWRD AXOM MALA PROJECT

Feedback Infra Pvt. Ltd. Design of Abutment

Horizont Transvers
Vertical Horizontal Long.
Applied Load kN Case al load- e
Load load-long. Moment
trans. moment
X Y Xi^2 yi^2 Normal HFL Seismic 1 Seismic 2 Seismic3 Normal 1059.43 298.35 0.00 157.37 0.00
1 -1.8 5.4 3 29.16 121.50 117 168 113 244 HFL 934.97 298.35 0.00 0.00 0.00
2 -1.8 1.8 3 3.24 121.50 117 147 91 172 Seismic 1 1287.34 356.82 210.28 361.26 780.73
3 -1.8 -1.8 3 3.24 121.50 117 125 70 100 Seismic 2 1312.66 561.51 210.28 1204.21 780.73
4 -1.8 -5.4 3 29.16 121.50 117 103 48 27 Seismic3 1287.34 356.82 700.92 361.26 2602.44
5 1.8 5.4 3 29.16 143.36 117 219 280 294 N 8
6 1.8 1.8 3 3.24 143.36 117 197 259 222 Total Ixx = 26
7 1.8 -1.8 3 3.24 143.36 117 175 237 150 Total Iyy = 130
8 1.8 -5.4 3 29.16 143.36 117 153 215 78
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20

Total 25.92 129.6

Horizont
Moment in Vertical Load Load Load Case Load Case
Case al load Case Load Case 2
pile load
Case 1 Case 3 4 5
per pile
Normal 37.29 145.42 143.36 Max Total load in row 1 486 467 543 322 543
HFL 37.29 145.42 116.87 Min Total load in row 2 573 467 744 991 744
Seismic 1 51.77 201.87 Total load in row 3 0 0 0 0 0
Seismic 2 74.95 292.24 Total load in row 4
Seismic3 98.31 383.35

ASOM PWRD AXOM MALA PROJECT

Feedback Infra Pvt. Ltd. Design of Abutment

DESIGN OF ABUTMENTS SLS CASE

The GA of abutment is as below (All Dimensions in mm) Total Width of Abutment = 12.00 m
300 Cut out for span = 25.00 m
Surcharge load 300 Exp. Joint RL 64.700
Approach Slab 300 6.039

300
Tr. Moment from Superstructure

Girder and slab

7
= In table below

300
8

height
2110
6
P = In table below
300 CL of Bearing
300 750 570

1560
Hzl. Force = In table below 61.24
Bearing and

350
Pedestal height

400
400
270 HFL RL 61.022
4
3

5539 mm
600
5
600 1
2

12

Formation Level
3079 mm

Overall Height
600

above GL to
750

7715 mm
11
RL 59.161 Ground Level
13

1.950 m 500
14

900 RL 58.661
1800 mm 1800 mm
10 1800
0 mm RL 56.86
9
A
Pile diameter
1.20 m Φ 1.20 m Φ 3554 mm
1.80 m 1.80 m RL 53.307 SCOUR
0.75 m 0.75 m
5.1

ASOM PWRD AXOM MALA PROJECT

Feedback Infra Pvt. Ltd. Design of Abutment

DESIGN DATA
a) SOIL DATA
Assumed SBC = 15.00 t/m²
Density of Soil Fill = 2.00 t/m3
Angle of Internal Friction = f = 30 º
Surcharge Angle = b = 0º
Wall Angle = a = 90 º
Angle of Wall Friction = d = 20 º Surcharge Height = 1.20 m
Friction Coefficient = m = 0.50

sin2 (a + f ) cosd 1
Normal: Ka = x = 0.279
sin2 a sin(a - d ) é sin(f + d ) sin(f - b ) ù
2

ê1 + ú
ê
ë sin(a - d ) sin(a + b ) ú
û

slope of earth fill (ς) = 0.00

Long horizontal seismic coefficient (αh) = 0.180
Long vertical seismic coefficient (αv) = 0.120
Trans vertical seismic coefficient (αv) = 0.360
Trans horizontal seismic coefficient (αh) = 0.540
Wall angle (alpha ') = 0.00 º
λ = 11.57 º
b) CONCRETE DATA
Density of Concrete = 2.5 t/m3
Grade of Concrete = M 35

ASOM PWRD AXOM MALA PROJECT

Feedback Infra Pvt. Ltd. Design of Abutment

Normal Case:

P1 = 4.049 T

P1 = 10.189 T 7.839 m

4.820 m
4.336 m GL

3.374t/m

Pilecap base 1.800 m A

4.380t/m
0.671t/m
P2 19.0960 2.383 T 3.55 m
#####

6.366t/m Scour Level

LOAD CALCULATION FOR NET LOADS AT A

OVERTURNING LOADS (PER RUNNING M OF WALL) UPTO PILECAP TOP
Total Horizontal Load due to Earth Pressure = 10.189 T At Lever arm = 2.54 m
Total Horizontal Load due to Surcharge Pressure = 4.049 T At Lever arm = 3.02 m
Hence, Total Horizontal Load = 170.859 T
Total Overturning Moment = 456.84 t-m

ASOM PWRD AXOM MALA PROJECT

Feedback Infra Pvt. Ltd. Design of Abutment

OVERTURNING LOADS OF PILECAP BOTTOM

Total Horizontal Load due to Earth Pressure = 74.709 T At Lever arm = 0.90 m
Total Horizontal Load due to Earth Pressure -triangle = 11.134 T At Lever arm = 0.76 m
Total Horizontal Load due to Surcharge Pressure = 14.845 T At Lever arm = 0.90 m
Total Horizobntal load - all loads upto pilecap bottom = 269.092 T
Total Overturning moment of all loads upto pile cap bottom = 925.51 t-m
FOR HFL CASE
Total Horizobntal load - all loads upto pilecap bottom = 240.068 T
Total Overturning moment of all loads upto pile cap bottom = 1388.78 t-m

Seismic Case:

P1 = 4.049 T

P1 = 10.189 T 7.839 m

3.020 m
2.536 m GL

3.374t/m

Pilecap base 1.800 m A

4.380t/m
0.671t/m Scour Level
3.55 m

ASOM PWRD AXOM MALA PROJECT

Feedback Infra Pvt. Ltd. Design of Abutment

LOAD CALCULATION FOR NET LOADS AT A

OVERTURNING LOADS (PER RUNNING M OF WALL) UPTO PILECAP TOP
Total Horizontal Load due to Earth Pressure = 10.189 T At Lever arm = 2.54 m Width of pile cap= 12.30 m
Total Horizontal Load due to Surcharge Pressure = 4.049 T At Lever arm = 3.02 m

Hence, Total Horizontal Load = 170.859 T

Total Overturning Moment = 456.84 t-m

OVERTURNING LOADS OF PILECAP

Total Horizontal Load due to Earth Pressure = 17.168 T At Lever arm = 3.29 m

Total Horizontal Load due to Surcharge Pressure = 5.256 T At Lever arm = 3.92 m
Total Horizobntal load - all loads upto pilecap bottom = 269.092 T
Total Overturning moment of all loads upto pile cap bottom = 925.51 t-m

STABILISING LOADS:
Long
Trans TransHori
Vertical Horizont Horizont
HZL. Dist. From Vertical Horizont zontal
Area No. Width Description Length Height Density Vertical Load Moment at A seismic al al Factor
A seismic al seismic
moment seismic seismic
seismic moment
moment
1 12.00 m Vertical Wall 0.600 3.579 2.500 64.422 2.550 164.276 7.731 19.713 11.596 41.624 34.7879 124.871 1
1a 12.00 m Vertical Wall 0.300 2.579 2.500 11.606 2.150 24.950 1.393 2.994 2.089 7.498 6.26697 22.495 1
2 12.00 m Dirtwall Haunch 0.750 0.600 2.500 6.750 3.100 20.925 0.810 2.511 1.215 5.806 3.645 17.419 1
3 12.00 m Dirtwall Haunch 0.750 0.400 2.500 9.000 3.225 29.025 1.080 3.483 1.620 8.390 4.86 25.170 1
4 12.00 m Corbel for bearing 0.270 0.400 2.500 3.240 2.115 6.853 0.389 0.822 0.583 3.020 1.7496 9.061 1
5 12.00 m Corbel for bearing 0.270 0.600 2.500 2.430 2.160 5.249 0.292 0.630 0.437 2.090 1.3122 6.271 1
6 12.00 m Dirtwall 0.300 2.460 2.500 22.140 3.450 76.383 2.657 9.166 3.985 25.740 11.9556 77.221 1
7 12.00 m Approach slab corbel 0.300 0.300 2.500 2.700 3.750 10.125 0.324 1.215 0.486 3.591 1.458 10.773 1
8 12.00 m Approach slab corbel 0.300 0.300 2.500 1.350 3.700 4.995 0.162 0.599 0.243 1.735 0.729 5.204 1
9 12.30 m Heel of pilecap 2.550 1.800 2.500 141.143 3.975 561.041 16.937 67.325 25.406 22.865 76.217 68.595 1
10 12.30 m Toe of pile cap 2.550 1.800 2.500 141.143 0.975 137.614 16.937 16.514 25.406 22.865 76.217 68.595 1
11 12.30 m Soil Fill on heel 0.750 2.579 2.000 47.583 3.225 153.454 5.710 18.414 8.565 26.461 25.6946 79.383 1
12 12.30 m Soil Fill on heel 0.750 0.600 2.000 5.535 3.100 17.159 0.664 2.059 0.996 4.562 2.9889 13.686 1
13 12.30 m Soil Fill on heel 1.500 6.039 2.000 222.839 3.975 885.785 26.741 106.294 40.111 193.315 120.333 579.945 1
14 12.30 m soil fill on toe 1.950 0.500 2.000 23.985 0.975 23.385 2.878 2.806 4.317 8.850 12.9519 26.551 1
15 12.30 m Reduce area 7 & 8 2.000 -3.240 - -12.096 -0.389 -1.452 -0.583 -1.7496 - 1
16 12.30 m VC normal of EP 97.941 2.850 279.133 - - - - 1
17 12.30 m VC seismic of EP 97.941 2.850 279.133 11.753 33.496 - - 1
18 0.50 m Retaining wall Load 2.250 6.039 2.500 16.985 3.525 59.871 2.038 7.185 3.057 14.734 9.17173 44.203 1
Total Stabilising Loads Normal 817.55 2448.13

ASOM PWRD AXOM MALA PROJECT

Feedback Infra Pvt. Ltd. Design of Abutment

STABILISING LOADS: HFL CASE

HZL. Dist. From

Area No. Width Description Length Height Density Vertical Load Moment at A
A

1 12.00 m Vertical Wall up to HFL 0.600 1.218 2.500 21.924 2.550 55.906
1 12.00 m Vertical Wall below HFL 0.600 2.361 1.500 25.499 2.550 65.022
1a 12.00 m Vertical Wall up to HFL 0.300 0.218 2.500 0.981 2.150 2.109
1a 12.00 m Vertical Wall below HFL 0.300 2.361 1.500 6.375 2.150 13.704
2 12.00 m Dirtwall Haunch 0.750 0.600 2.500 13.500 3.100 41.850
3 12.00 m Dirtwall Haunch 0.750 0.400 2.500 9.000 3.225 29.025
4 12.00 m Corbel for bearing 0.270 0.400 2.500 1.620 2.115 3.426
5 12.00 m Corbel for bearing 0.270 0.600 2.500 4.860 2.160 10.498
6 12.00 m Dirtwall 0.300 2.460 2.500 22.140 3.450 76.383
7 12.00 m Approach slab corbel 0.300 0.300 2.500 1.350 3.750 5.063
8 12.00 m Approach slab corbel 0.300 0.300 2.500 2.700 3.700 9.990
9 12.30 m Heel of pilecap 2.550 1.800 1.500 84.686 3.975 336.625
10 12.30 m Toe of pile cap 2.550 1.800 1.500 84.686 0.975 82.568
11 12.30 m Soil Fill on heel above HFL 0.750 0.218 2.000 2.011 3.225 6.486
11 12.30 m Soil Fill on heel below HFL 0.750 2.361 1.000 21.780 3.225 70.241
11 12.30 m Soil Fill on heel 0.750 0.600 2.000 11.070 3.225 35.701
11 12.30 m Soil Fill on heel above HFL 1.500 1.218 2.000 44.944 3.975 178.653
11 12.30 m Soil Fill on heel below HFL 1.500 2.361 1.000 43.560 3.975 173.153
14 12.30 m soil fill on toe 1.950 0.500 2.000 23.985 0.975 23.385
15 12.30 m Reduce area 7 & 8 2.000 -3.240 - -12.042
16 12.30 m VC normal of EP 87.378 2.850 249.027
18 0.50 m Retaining wall Load above HFL2.250 1.218 2.500 3.426 3.525 12.075
18 0.50 m Retaining wall Load below HFL2.250 2.361 1.500 3.984 3.525 14.044
Normal 518.22 1482.89
Total Stabilising Loads
Seismic N-Seismic Part 518.22 1482.89

ASOM PWRD AXOM MALA PROJECT

Feedback Infra Pvt. Ltd. Design of Abutment

Normal Case:
Final Loads and Bending Moments at the centre of base are as below
Total Vertical Load = 817.550 T
Total Moment = -1520.5 t-m Against OTM

SUMMARY OF LOADS AT CENTRE OF BASE FOR ENTIRE WIDTH OF ABUTMENTS SKEW ANGLE= 0.00 m
Vertical Horizontal Horizontal Transverse
Sl. No. Description Long. Moment
Load load-long. load-trans. moment
1 Overturning & stabilsing loads 817.55 269.09 0.00
2 Dead loads from superstructure
Girder 201.59 0.00
Slab loads 0.00 0.00
SIDL 40.29 0.00
Live loads (Max load) 119.61 0.00 113.63
(Max Long Moment) 115.55 0.00 86.66
(Max Trans Moment) 75.68 0.00 223.26
Braking loads 3.87 29.26 0.00 157.37 0.00
Totals 1182.91 298.35 0.00 157.37 223.26

ASOM PWRD AXOM MALA PROJECT

Feedback Infra Pvt. Ltd. Design of Abutment

Seismic Case:
Final Loads and Bending Moments at the centre of base are as below
Total Vertical Load = 817.550 T
Total Moment = -1520.5 t-m Against OTM

SUMMARY OF LOADS AT CENTRE OF BASE FOR ENTIRE WIDTH OF ABUTMENTS SKEW ANGLE= 0
Vertical Horizontal Horizontal Transverse
Sl. No. Description Long. Moment
Load load-long. load-trans. moment
1 Overturning & stabilsing loads 817.55 269.09 0.00
2 Dead loads from superstructure
Girder 201.59 0.00
Slab loads 0.00 0.00
SIDL 40.29 0.00
Live loads (Max load) 4.78 0.00 22.73
(Max Long Moment) 4.78 0.00 22.73
(Max Trans Moment) 3.03 0.00 44.65
Braking loads 0.46 3.49 31.47 Considering 20% of live load and braking
0.2 for design of foundation as per irc 6
4 Seismic (Horizontal-long) 37.64 43.32 178.40 (increase in seismic force)
5 Seismic (Horizontal-trans) 112.93 103.84 385.55
Long+0.3*Trans+0.3*vertical 37.64 43.32 31.15 178.40 115.66
Totals Comb
0.3*Long+Trans+0.3*vertical 33.88 13.00 103.84 53.52 385.55
0.3*Long+0.3*Trans+vertical 33.88 13.00 31.15 53.52 115.66

DL+SIDL+0.2LL+0.2Breaking+Seismic Vertical 1098.55 285.58 31.15 84.99 160.32

DL+SIDL+0.2Breaking+Seismic Long 1102.32 315.90 31.15 209.88 160.32
DL+SIDL+0.2LL+0.2Breaking+Seismic Trans 1098.55 285.58 103.84 84.99 430.20

HFl Case:
Final Loads and Bending Moments at the centre of base are as below
Total Vertical Load = 518.218 T
Total Moment = -92.8 t-m Against OTM

ASOM PWRD AXOM MALA PROJECT

Feedback Infra Pvt. Ltd. Design of Abutment

SUMMARY OF LOADS AT CENTRE OF BASE FOR ENTIRE WIDTH OF ABUTMENTS SKEW ANGLE= 0.00 m
Vertical Horizontal Horizontal Transverse
Sl. No. Description Long. Moment
Load load-long. load-trans. moment
1 Overturning & stabilsing loads 518.22 269.09 0.00
2 Dead loads from superstructure
Girder 201.59 0.00
Slab loads 0.00 0.00
SIDL 40.29 0.00
Live loads (Max load) 119.61 0.00 113.63
(Max Long Moment) 115.55 0.00 86.66
(Max Trans Moment) 115.55 0.00 223.26
Braking loads 3.87 29.26 157.37
Totals 883.58 298.35 157.37 223.26

PILE LOAD CALCULATIONS

Providing the following arrangement of piles
dia of piles : 1.20 m Ø Projection of pilecap beyond pile = 150 mm
spacing of piles : 1.8 m c/c std for clayey = 3.77 m c/c Total length of pile = 25.00 m
No. of piles : 8 min for sandy = 3.60 m c/c Pile cap thickness = 1.80 m

ASOM PWRD AXOM MALA PROJECT

Feedback Infra Pvt. Ltd. Design of Abutment

Vertical Horizont Horizon Long. Transver

Applied Load kN Case
Load al load- tal load- Moment se
Sno X Y Xi^2 yi^2 Normal HFL Seismic 1 Seismic 2 Seismic3 Normal 1183 298 0 157 223
1 -1.8 5.4 3 29.16 146 109 138 130 149 HFL 884 298 0 157 223
2 -1.8 1.8 3 3.24 140 103 134 125 137 Seismic 1 1099 286 31 85 160
3 -1.8 -1.8 3 3.24 134 96 129 121 125 Seismic 2 1102 316 31 210 160
4 -1.8 -5.4 3 29.16 128 90 125 117 113 Seismic3 1099 286 104 85 430
5 1.8 5.4 3 29.16 168 131 150 159 161 N 8
6 1.8 1.8 3 3.24 162 124 145 155 149
7 1.8 -1.8 3 3.24 156 118 141 150 137 Total Ixx = 26
8 1.8 -5.4 3 29.16 149 112 137 146 125 Total Iyy = 130
9 0 0
10 0 0
11 0 0
12 0 0
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
Total 25.92 129.6

Horizontal
Moment in Vertical Load Case Load Load Case
Case load per Load Case 1 Load Case 2
pile load
3 Case 4 5
pile
Normal 37.29 145.42 168.09 Total load in row 1 548 398 526 493 526
HFL 37.29 145.42 130.68 Total load in row 2 635 486 573 609 573
Seismic 1 35.91 140.02 Total load in row 3 0 0 0 0 0
Seismic 2 39.68 154.72 Total load in row 4
Seismic3 37.98 148.11

ASOM PWRD AXOM MALA PROJECT

Feedback Infra Pvt. Ltd. Design of Abutment

Design of Pile & Pile Cap -SLS

SECTION A

Y (TRANSVERSE)

Origin
X (LONGITUDINAL)

ROW 1
ROW 2 ROW 3

SECTION A
Materials
Grade of Concrete, fck = M 35
Grade of Steel, fyk = Fe500

Load Load Case Load Load Load

Quasi Load Case Case 1 Load Case 2 3 SLS Load Case Case 1 Case 2 Case 3
Total load in row 1 486.00 467.48 543.32 Total load in row 1 547.74 398.08 525.67
Total load in row 2 573.43 467.48 744.02 Total load in row 2 635.17 485.50 572.89
Total load in row 3 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total load in row 3 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total load in row 4 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total load in row 4 0.00 0.00 0.00

ASOM PWRD AXOM MALA PROJECT

Feedback Infra Pvt. Ltd. Design of Abutment

0.90
1.72

0.00
1.80

5.10

Width of cap = 12
Depth of Pile Cap = 1.80 m
Pile shall be embeded in Pile cap = 50 mm
Eff. cover for Reinforcement = 75 mm As per amendment 2015 to IRC 112
Dia of Rebar Long. Direction = 20 mm Density of Concrete 2.5 t/m2
Dia of Rebar Transverse Direction = 20 mm Density of Soil 2 t/m2
Effe. Depth of pile cap, deff = 1715 mm
Height of soil over cap = 0.50 m
Length of Heel = 1.95 m
Length of Toe = 2.25 m
Design of Pile Cap in Longitudinal Direction Rare Quasi
Weight of Pile cap+earth over it+ RE wall = 176.5 t DL Backfill
Bending Moment due to weight of pile cap & soil at pier face = 214.6 tm 214.6 tm 1.00 1.0
Total Load on Pile in one col, Max of = 744.0 t 635.2 t
Lever arm for bending moment due to Pile = 1.80 0 m
Bending Moment in Long. Dir. due to Pile = 1339.2 tm 1143.3 tm
Net Bending moment at the face = 1124.7 tm 928.7 tm
Net Bending moment at the face Short term = 195.9 tm

ASOM PWRD AXOM MALA PROJECT

Feedback Infra Pvt. Ltd. Design of Abutment

Design for Stress Lvl., Check - SLS Case 1-ML Reference

Design Constants Characteristic Comp. Cube Strength, mpa f ck 35 IRC 112-2011
Characteristic yield strength of steel,mpa f yk 500
Modulus of Elasticity of Steel, mpa Es 2.0E+05
Mean value of Conc. Cube Comp. Strength f cm 45 Eq. A2- 1
Secant Modulus of Elasticity of Conc., mpa E cm 32308.2 Eq. A2- 5
Modulus of Elasticity of conc (with creep) Quasi E c, eff 16154.1
Modulus of Elasticity of conc (with creep) Rare E c, eff 17695.5
Effective Modular ratio for Quasi a e = E s / E c,eff 12.4 Cl. 12.4.2 (2), Eq. 12.15
Effective Modular ratio for Rare a e = E s / E c,eff 11.3
Creep coefficient f 1.00 Cl. 6.4.2.7
Material factor Steel gs 1.15 Cl. 6.2.2. Notes(1)
Concrete gm 1.50 Cl. 6.4.2.8
Coeff. to consider influence of conc. Strength,alpha a 0.67 Cl. 6.4.2.8
Effective ht. factor of comp. zone, l 0.80 A2.9, Eq A2-33
Effective strength factor, h 1.00 A2.9, Eq A2-35
Design comp strength, mpa f cd = α f ck / g m 15.6 Cl. 6.4.2.8
Design strength of steel, mpa f yd = f yk / g s 434.8 cl.6.2.2
Factored design Moment, tm Mu 1124.7
Width of the cap, mm b or bw 12000
Depth of cap, mm D 1800
Tension Reinforcement Spacing of Bars 160
Dia. of Rebars, mm f 20
Area of Steel, mm2 A sl 23562
Clear cover, mm C 75
Effective depth, mm deff 1715.0

ASOM PWRD AXOM MALA PROJECT

Feedback Infra Pvt. Ltd. Design of Abutment

Case 1-ML
Depth of Neutral axis, mm, ytop x =(A sl f yd )/( l η b f cd ) 68.3
Compression Reinforcement No. of bars 160
Dia. of Rebars, mm f 16
Area of Steel, mm2 Asc 32153.6
Effective cover, mm d' 83.0
Depth of Extreme Fibre Tension Reinforcement, mm, ybot Ybot 1646.7 `
Moment of inertia of Uncracked section, mm4 I uncracked 5.98E+12
Tensile Stress in concrete fctm 1.693
Permissible tensile stress of concrete fctm, n 2.77 Eq. A2-2
Uncraked
Check of Stresses in Rare Case Creep and Elastic Modulus
Depth of concrete compression
dc = (( - AsEs) + sqrt((AsEs)^2 + 2 b As Es Eceff d )) / b Eceff 254.6
Icr (cracked) = As (d- dc)^2 +Eceff b dc^3/3 Es 5.61E+10
Section Modulus, mm3 Ztop 2.2E+08
Section Modulus, mm3 Zbot 3.8E+07
Compressive Stresses at top s c top 4.52
Permissible stress 0.48*fck 16.80
safe
Tensile Stress at level of Steel 292.8
Permissible stress 0.6*fyk 300.0
safe `
Quasipermanent Combinations
Case 1-ML
Factored design Moment, tm Mu 928.7
Check of Stresses Quasi case Creep and Elastic Modulus
Depth of concrete compression
dc = (( - AsEs) + sqrt((AsEs)^2 + 2 b As Es Eceff d )) / b Eceff 265.5
Icr (cracked) = As (d- dc)^2 +Eceff b dc^3/3 Es 5.56E+10
Section Modulus, mm3 Ztop 2.1E+08
Section Modulus, mm3 Zbot 3.8E+07
Compressive Stresses at top s c top 3.58
Permissible stress 0.48*fck 16.80
safe
Tensile Stress at level of Steel 242.20
Permissible stress 0.6*fyk 300.0
safe

ASOM PWRD AXOM MALA PROJECT

Feedback Infra Pvt. Ltd. Design of Abutment

Design for Crack Width, Check - SLS Case 1-ML Crack width as per Cl. 12.3.4
Cracked Status Uncraked
Factor depending on duration of load Kt 0.50
h 1800
hc,eff 212.5
Ac,eff 2550000.0
r P,eff 0.009
fct, eff 2.77
[ s sc -K t *f ct,eff / r p,eff (1+ a e r p , eff )] / E s >=[0.6* s sc / E S ] 0.0004 Eq .12.6
[0.6* s sc /E S ] 0.0007 Eq .12.6
(esm-ecm) 0.0007 Eq .12.6
Spacing of tension Reinforcement S 160
For Bonded Reinforcement within tension zone If S < CP
Cover Parameter for SR,Max, mm CP 425.0
k1 0.80
k2 0.50
Max crack spacing S r,Max 622.97 Eq .12.8
For Deformed Bara associated with pure bending If S > CP
Max crack spacing Sr,Max 622.97 Eq .12.8
Crack width WK = Sr,max*(ξ sm –ξ cm) 0.294
Crack width permissible WK,PER 0.30
safe

ASOM PWRD AXOM MALA PROJECT

Feedback Infra Pvt. Ltd. Design of Abutment

Calculation of Creep Coeffiecient (As per Annexure A2, A2.5, IRC:112-2011)

For abut Shaft

Ф(t,t 0 ) = β c (t,t 0 ).Ф 0 = 1.54
Where,
Ф0 = Ф RH β(f cm ) β(t 0 ). = 1.56
t = Age of concrete in days at time the time considered = = 25550 days
t0 = is the age of Concrete in days at time of loading = 90 days
Ф RH = 1+(1-RH/100)/(0.1*h 0 1/3 ) for fcm <= 45 = 1.43
RH = Relative Humidity
Relative Humidity = 50 %
fck = Characteristic Compressive Strength = 35 MPa
fcm = Mean Compressive Strength = 45 MPa
β(f cm ) = 18.78/√f cm = 2.80
β(t 0 ). = 1/(0.1+t 0 0.2 ) = 0.39
h0 = Notional side of Member 2Ac/u = 1565.2 mm
w = Width of Section = 12000 mm
h = Depth of Section = 900 mm
Ac = Cross Sectional Area, mm2 = 10800000 mm2
u = Perimeter in Contact with atmosphere = 13800 mm
β c (t,t 0 ) = [(t-t 0 ) / (βH + t - t 0 )] 0.3 = 0.983
(t-t 0 ) = Actual duration of loading = 25460 days
βH = 1.5(1+(1.2 RH/RH 0 ) 18 )h 0 + 250 <= 1500 fcm = 45 = 1500.0
RH 0 = = 100 %

For Pile Cap AND PILE

Ф(t,t 0 ) = β c (t,t 0 ).Ф 0 = 1.00
t = Age of concrete in days at time the time considered = = 25550 days
t0 = is the age of Concrete in days at time of loading = 90 days

ASOM PWRD AXOM MALA PROJECT

Feedback Infra Pvt. Ltd. Design of Abutment

Ф RH = 1+(1-RH/100)/(0.1*h 0 1/3 ) for fcm <= 45 = 1.00

RH = Relative Humidity
Relative Humidity = 50 %
fck = Characteristic Compressive Strength = 35 MPa
fcm = Mean Compressive Strength = 45 MPa
β(f cm ) = 18.78/√f cm = 2.80
β(t 0 ). = 1/(0.1+t 0 0.2 ) = 0.39
h0 = Notional side of Member 2Ac/u = 4428000000000.0 mm
w = Width of Section = 12300 mm
h = Depth of Section = 1800 mm
Ac = Cross Sectional Area, mm2 = 22140000 mm2
u = Perimeter in Contact with atmosphere = 0 mm
β c (t,t 0 ) = [(t-t 0 ) / (βH + t - t 0 )] 0.3 = 0.983
(t-t 0 ) = Actual duration of loading = 25460 days
βH = 1.5(1+(1.2 RH/RH 0 ) 18 )h 0 + 250 <= 1500 fcm = 45 = 1500.0
RH 0 = = 100 %

Modular Ratio FOR PILE

(RARE AND QUASI PERMANENT LOAD COMBINATIONS) NORMAL CASE

Design Bending moment ( with Rare combination) MRARE = 145.42 t-m/m

Design Bending moment ( with Quasi permanent combination) MQP = 145.42 t-m/m
Bending moment due to short term loading MST = 0.00 t-m/m

Modulus of elasticity of steel Es = 2.0E+05 Mpa

Modulus of elasticity of concrete Ecm = 32308.25 Mpa
Creep coefficient f = 1.00
For long term loading Ecm' = 16154.12 Mpa
Modular ratio for Quasi Permanent condition = Es/Ecm'
= 12.38074
Equavalent modulus of elasticity for Rare combination
Eceq = Ecm x( MQP + MST)
MST + (1+f) x MQP
= 16154.12 Mpa
Modular ratio for Rare combination = Es/Eceq
12.38

ASOM PWRD AXOM MALA PROJECT

Feedback Infra Pvt. Ltd. Design of Abutment

Moment in Stem
ULS CASE SLS CASE
Design Axial Longi. Transv. Design Axial Longi. Transv.
Sr.No Combinati Load Load Moment Moment Load Moment Moment
. ons Case
NED ML MT NED ML MT

1 Pmax 686.54 792.16 170.44 489.00 561.55 170.44

2 Basic MLmax 680.45 792.16 129.99 484.94 525.27 129.99

3 Mtmax 620.64 792.16 334.88 445.07 525.27 334.88

4 Pmax 657.32 706.83 170.44 466.01 468.38 170.44

5 HFL CASE MLmax 651.23 706.83 129.99 461.95 468.38 129.99

6 Mtmax 591.42 706.83 334.88 422.08 468.38 334.88

7 Pmax 613.04 806.51 381.19 552.40 525.27 637.19

8 Seismic MLmax 664.21 1228.15 381.19 505.73 525.27 637.19

9 Mtmax 766.55 806.51 1114.37 552.40 525.27 1342.56

QUASI CASE

Pmax 365.52 420.56 0.00

Basic MLmax 365.52 420.56 0.00

Mtmax 365.52 420.56 0.00

Pmax 342.52 363.67 0.00

HFL CASE MLmax 342.52 363.67 0.00
Mtmax 342.52 363.67 0.00

ASOM PWRD AXOM MALA PROJECT

Feedback Infra Pvt. Ltd. Design of Abutment

PILE Interaction Diagram

Pile Dia D = 1200 mm
d'/D = 0.09
Clear cover = 75 mm
1.20 Dia of bar = 32
Nos. of Bars = 32 Nos
Effective cover = 103 mm
Reinf Circular dia = 994 mm
Spacing = 97.5857 mm
Area of steel provided = 25735.9 mm2
Material Properties: % steel provided = 2.28 % OK
2
fck = 35 N/mm Minimum % steel = 0.40 % OK
2
fyk = 500 N/mm p/fck = 0.06502
2
Es = 200000 N/mm
Fyd = 434.783 N/mm2 Check of Min Steel as per 16.2.2 - IRC:112-2011
Min Steel 0.1Ned/Fyd = 875.586 mm2
0.002Ac = 2261.95 mm2 OK
Pu Mu
xu/D T Tm
1E-09 -1118.39 0.650843 1E-09
0.1 -876.468 119.5013 0.1
0.2 -436.227 304.0607 0.2
0.3 -59.5446 420.3117 0.3 3000
0.4 294.9918 485.7484 0.4
0.5 655.0655 506.2369 0.5 2500
0.6 1055.198 467.8244 0.6
2000
0.7 1427.718 404.3916 0.7
0.8 1738.582 337.0428 0.8 1500
0.9 2001.769 267.4147 0.9
1 2210.784 201.6128 1 1000
Pu (T)

1.1 2335.291 159.5096 1.1 500

1.2 2423.107 129.7174 1.2
1.3 2488.526 106.9733 1.3 0
1.4 2538.504 89.04693 1.4 0 100 200 300 400 500 600
-500
1.5 2576.817 74.60538 1.5
1.6 2606.641 62.91341 1.6 -1000
1.7 2630.031 53.44927 1.7
-1500
1.8 2648.37 45.82243 1.8 Mu (T-m)
1.9 2662.717 39.73229 1.9
2 2673.907 34.93148 2
2.1 2682.604 31.21105 2.1

Transverse Reinforcement (Cl. 16.2.3 IRC:112-2011)

Diameter of Transverse Reinforcement 8 mm OK

Spacing of Transverse Reinforcement shall be minimum of followng
384 mm
1200 mm
200 mm
Provide 8 dia @ 150 mm OK

ASOM PWRD AXOM MALA PROJECT

Feedback Infra Pvt. Ltd. Design of Abutment

Calculation of Confining Reinforcement

Ductile detailing has been done as per IRC-112

N ED
hk =  0 . 08
A C f ck

ηk = Normalized axial force Dsp

Ac = Area of section considered

NED = 380.690 T
2
Ac = 1.131 m ACC
fck = 35 N/mm2

Hence ηk = 0.094 > 0.08

Provide confining reinforcement

r f
 wd =
w yd

f cd
ωwd = Confining reinforcement expressed as ratio
fyd = 434.7826 Mpa
fcd = 15.61 Mpa
ρw = Volumetric ratio of tranverse reinforcement defined as

4 A sp
r w =
D sp .S L

Dsp = 1.050 m
The Minimum confining reinforcement is as given by

wd.c  Max(1.4.req;0.18)
Required confining reinforcement is given by

AC f
w.req = 0.37 hk + 0.13 yd (r L − .01)
ACC f cd

ACC = Confined (core) concrete area of the section within the outside
dia of the hoop
= 0.866 m2

ρL = 0.0228 = Ratio of reinforcement

wwreq = 0.09178

ASOM PWRD AXOM MALA PROJECT

Feedback Infra Pvt. Ltd. Design of Abutment

1.4ww.req = 0.1285
wwd.c = Max
0.18

wwd.c = 0.18

ρw = 0.006463

A sp r D sp = 0.00170 m2/m
=
w

S L 4 = 1696.42 mm2/m

Provide 16 @ 100 = 2010.62 mm2

SAFE

ASOM PWRD AXOM MALA PROJECT

Feedback Infra Pvt. Ltd. Design of Abutment

ULS, CHECK FOR PILE MOMENT CAPACITY :

1.20

Moment reduction factor m = 0.80

fck = 35 Mpa

ULS Forces at Pile Top Level :

Pile Reaction Moment MED Moment MRD
Vertical Load From Intraction Curve
Check ( MED<
LC Horizont M = Q (L1 + Min MRD)
Max Min al (Q) Lf)/2*m Max NED NED
Tonne Tonne Tonne Tm Tm
LC-1 214.24 181.46 55.94 218.13 #NAME? #NAME? #NAME?
LC-2 197.45 164.66 55.94 218.13 #NAME? #NAME? #NAME?
LC-3 264.21 141.82 52.75 234.09 #NAME? #NAME? #NAME?
LC-4 348.44 87.80 80.52 358.96 #NAME? #NAME? #NAME?
LC-5 380.69 114.74 93.17 441.42 #NAME? #NAME? #NAME?

ASOM PWRD AXOM MALA PROJECT

Feedback Infra Pvt. Ltd. Design of Abutment

DESIGN OF ABUTMENTS

The GA of abutment is as below (All Dimensions in mm) Total Width of Abutment = 12.00 m
300 Cut out for span = 25.00 m
Surcharge load 300 Exp. Joint RL 64.700
Approach Slab 300

300
Tr. Moment from Superstructure

Girder and slab

7
= In table below

300
8

height
2110
6
P = In table below
300 CL of Bearing
300 750 570

1560
Hzl. Force = In table below
Bearing and

350
Pedestal RL 62.240

400
400
270

5539 mm
RL 61.840 3 1620 4

600
1 5

600
2

RL 61.240

Formation Level
12

3079 mm

Overall Height
600

above GL to
750
HFL RL 61.022

7715 mm
11
1a RL 59.161 Ground Level

13

500
14
2.25 1.95
900 RL 58.661
1800 mm 1800 mm
10 1800
9
0 mm RL 56.86
A
Pile diameter 1399.8
1.20 m Φ 1.20 m Φ 3554 mm
1.80 m 1.80 m RL 53.307 SCOUR
0.75 m 0.75 m
5.1

ASOM PWRD AXOM MALA PROJECT

Feedback Infra Pvt. Ltd. Design of Abutment

DESIGN DATA
a) SOIL DATA

Density of Soil Fill = 2.00 t/m3

Angle of Internal Friction = f = 30 º
Surcharge Angle = b = 0º
Wall Angle = a = 90 º
Angle of Wall Friction = d = 20 º Surcharge Height = 1.20 m
Friction Coefficient = m = 0.50
sin2 (a + f ) cosd 1
Ka = x
Normal: sin2 a sin(a - d ) é sin(f + d ) sin(f - b ) ù
2 = 0.279
ê1 + ú
ê
ë sin(a - d ) sin(a + b ) ú
û

slope of earth fill (ς) = 0.00

Long horizontal seismic coefficient (αh) = 0.180
Long vertical seismic coefficient (αv) = 0.120
Trans vertical seismic coefficient (αv) = 0.360
Trans seismic coefficient (αh) = 0.540
Wall angle (alpha ') = 0.00 º
λ = 11.57 º
b) CONCRETE DATA
Density of Concrete = 2.5 t/m3
Grade of Concrete = M 35

ASOM PWRD AXOM MALA PROJECT

Feedback Infra Pvt. Ltd. Design of Abutment

Normal Case:

7.839 m

Lever Arm 4.820 m

4.336 m GL
Force at Pile Cap Top P1 = 10.189 T P1 = 4.049 T

Pressure at pile cap top 3.374t/m

0.671t/m
1.800 m A
Pressure at Pilecap base 4.380t/m

P2 Force at Scour 2.383 T 3.55 m

19.0960
1.67 m

Pressure at Scour Point 6.366t/m Scour Level

Earth Pressure Surcharge

ASOM PWRD AXOM MALA PROJECT

Feedback Infra Pvt. Ltd. Design of Abutment

LOAD CALCULATION FOR NET LOADS AT A

OVERTURNING LOADS (PER RUNNING M OF WALL) UPTO PILECAP TOP
Total Horizontal Load due to Earth Pressure = 10.189 T At Lever arm = 2.54 m
Total Horizontal Load due to Surcharge Pressure = 4.049 T At Lever arm = 3.02 m
Hence, Total Horizontal Load = 170.859 T
Total Overturning Moment = 456.84 t-m

Seismic Case:

P1 = 0.000 T

P1 = 18.735 T 7.839 m

3.020 m
2.536 m GL

6.205t/m

Pilecap base 1.800 m A

0.000t/m
0.000t/m
3.55 m

Scour Level

ASOM PWRD AXOM MALA PROJECT

Feedback Infra Pvt. Ltd. Design of Abutment

VERTICAL LOADS: DRY CASE

Trans
Vertical Long Horizontal Horizonta
Vertical HZL. Dist. Horizont
Area No. Width Description Length Height Density Moment at A Vertical seismic seismic Horizontal seismic l seismic
Load From A al
moment seismic moment moment
seismic
1 12.00 m Vertical Wall 0.600 3.579 2.500 64.422 2.550 164.276 7.731 19.713 11.596 20.751 34.788 62.253
1a 12.00 m Vertical Wall 0.300 2.579 2.500 11.606 2.150 24.950 1.393 2.994 2.089 3.738 6.267 11.215
2 12.00 m Dirtwall Haunch 0.750 0.600 2.500 6.750 3.250 21.938 0.810 2.633 1.215 3.619 3.645 10.858
3 12.00 m Dirtwall Haunch 0.750 0.400 2.500 9.000 3.375 30.375 1.080 3.645 1.620 5.474 4.860 16.422
4 12.00 m Corbel for bearing 0.270 0.400 2.500 3.240 1.965 6.367 0.389 0.764 0.583 1.971 1.750 5.912
5 12.00 m Corbel for bearing 0.270 0.600 2.500 2.430 2.010 4.884 0.292 0.586 0.437 1.303 1.312 3.909
6 12.00 m Dirtwall 0.300 2.460 2.500 22.140 3.600 79.704 2.657 9.564 3.985 18.567 11.956 55.701
7 12.00 m Approach slab corbel 0.300 0.300 2.500 2.700 3.900 10.530 0.324 1.264 0.486 2.716 1.458 8.149
8 12.00 m Approach slab corbel 0.300 0.300 2.500 1.350 3.850 5.198 0.162 0.624 0.243 1.297 0.729 3.892
9 12.00 m Heel of pilecap 2.250 1.800 0.000 0.000 4.050 0.000 0.000 0.000 - - - -
10 12.00 m Toe of pile cap 1.950 1.800 0.000 0.000 0.825 0.000 0.000 0.000 - - - -
11 12.00 m Soil Fill on heel 0.750 2.579 2.000 46.422 3.375 156.674 -5.571 -18.801 0.000 0.000 25.068 77.447
12 12.00 m Soil Fill on heel 0.750 0.600 2.000 5.400 3.250 17.550 -0.648 -2.106 0.000 0.000 2.916 13.352
13 12.00 m Soil Fill on heel 1.500 6.039 2.000 217.404 4.425 962.013 -26.088 -115.442 0.000 0.000 117.398 565.800
14 12.00 m soil fill on toe 1.950 0.500 2.000 23.400 0.975 22.815 -2.808 -2.738 0.000 0.000 12.636 25.904
15 12.00 m Reduce area 7 & 8 2.000 -3.240 - -12.582 0.389 -1.510 -0.583 - -1.750 -

ASOM PWRD AXOM MALA PROJECT

Feedback Infra Pvt. Ltd. Design of Abutment

EARTH PRESSURE FOR NORMAL HFL CASE

Layer Force Due to Moment about Moment due to

Reduced Level Ka g Ka*g*z c.g. of f-Soil
thickness (z) f-soil Abutment f-Soil

(m) (m) (kN/m^2) kN m kNm kNm

TOP OF DECK LEVEL 64.70 0.0
3.678 0.279 20.0 20.6 453.5 62.6 1771.4 4199.6
HFL 61.02 20.6
2.361 0.279 10.0 27.1 675.7 59.8 760.9 4378.6
ABUTMENT BOTTOM 58.66 27.1
1.800 0.279 10.0 32.2 640.7 57.7 2837.4
Pile cap Bottom 56.86 32.2
0.000 0.279 10.0 32.2 0.0 56.9 0.0
Scour Level 56.86
Total 7.839 1769.9 2532.3 11415.6

ASOM PWRD AXOM MALA PROJECT

Feedback Infra Pvt. Ltd. Design of Abutment

Live Load Surcharge

Height of Live Load Surcharge = 1.2 m
Ka = 0.279
Live Load Surcharge Pressure = 6.705 kN/m^2
Force Due to Live Load Surcharge (abut) = 485.9 KN
Force Due to Live Load Surcharge (Foundation Bootom) = 630.7 KN
Force Due to Live Load Surcharge (Scour Level) = 916.7 KN
Moments @Pile cap Bottom = 2472.2 kN-m
Moments @Abutment Shaft Bottom Level = 1467.2 kN-m
Moments @Pile cap Bottom
Active Moment Due to Surcharge = 2472.2 kN-m Active Moment Due to f -Soil = 11415.6 kN-m

Total Active Moment = = 13887.81 kN-m

Force @Pile cap Bottom

Active Force Due to Surcharge = 630.7 kN Active Force Due to f -Soil = 1769.9 kN

Total Active Force = = 2400.68 kN

Moments @Abutment Shaft Bottom Level

Active Moment Due to Surcharge = 1467.2 kN-m Active Moment Due to f -Soil = 2532.3 kN-m

Total Active Moment = = 3999.49 kN-m

ASOM PWRD AXOM MALA PROJECT

Feedback Infra Pvt. Ltd. Design of Abutment

VERTICAL LOADS: HFL CASE

Vertical
Area No. Width Description Length Height Density
Load (T)

1 12.00 m Vertical Wall abve HFL 0.600 1.218 2.500 21.924

1 12.00 m Vertical Wall BELOW HFL 0.600 2.361 1.500 25.499
1a 12.00 m Vertical Wall abve HFL 0.300 0.218 2.500 0.589
1a 12.00 m Vertical Wall below HFL 0.300 2.361 1.500 6.375
2 12.00 m Dirtwall Haunch 0.750 0.600 2.500 6.750
3 12.00 m Dirtwall Haunch 0.750 0.400 2.500 9.000
4 12.00 m Corbel for bearing 0.270 0.400 2.500 3.240
5 12.00 m Corbel for bearing 0.270 0.600 2.500 2.430
6 12.00 m Dirtwall 0.300 2.460 2.500 22.140
7 12.00 m Approach slab corbel 0.300 0.300 2.500 2.700
8 12.00 m Approach slab corbel 0.300 0.300 2.500 1.350

ASOM PWRD AXOM MALA PROJECT

Feedback Infra Pvt. Ltd. Design of Abutment

Normal Case:
Final Loads and Bending Moments at the centre of top of pile cap are as below
Total Vertical Load = 123.638 T
Dry Case ULS VERTICAL LOAD RARE VERTICAL LOAD ULS FACTOR FOR SEISMIC
Long Horizontal Trans Horizontal
Fctored Factor for Fctored
Area No. Description Vertical Load Factor for ULS Horizontal seismic Horizontal seismic
Forces (T) Rare Forces (T)
seismic moment seismic moment
1 Vertical Wall 76.028 1.35 102.64 1 76.03 18.47 33.06 55.42 99.18
2 Dirtwall Haunch 6.750 1.35 9.11 1 6.75 1.64 4.89 4.92 14.66
3 Dirtwall Haunch 9.000 1.35 12.15 1 9.00 2.19 7.39 6.56 22.17
4 Corbel for bearing 3.240 1.35 4.37 1 3.24 0.79 2.66 2.36 7.98
5 Corbel for bearing 2.430 1.35 3.28 1 2.43 0.59 1.76 1.77 5.28
6 Dirtwall 22.140 1.35 29.89 1 22.14 5.38 25.07 16.14 75.20
7 Approach slab corbel 2.700 1.35 3.65 1 2.70 0.66 3.67 1.97 11.00
8 Approach slab corbel 1.350 1.35 1.82 1 1.35 0.33 1.75 0.98 5.25
9 Total 166.91 123.64
10 Erath Pressure Moment (T-m) 456.84 t-m 1.5 685.26 t-m 1 456.84 t-m

HFL Case ULS VERTICAL LOAD RARE VERTICAL LOAD

Fctored Factor for Fctored

Area No. Description Vertical Load Factor
Forces (T) Rare Forces (T)

1 Vertical Wall above HFL 22.513 1.35 30.39 1 22.51

2 Vertical Wall BELOW HFL 31.874 1.35 43.03 1 31.87
3 Dirtwall Haunch 6.750 1.35 9.11 1 6.75
4 Dirtwall Haunch 9.000 1.35 12.15 1 9.00
5 Corbel for bearing 3.240 1.35 4.37 1 3.24
6 Corbel for bearing 2.430 1.35 3.28 1 2.43
7 Dirtwall 22.140 1.35 29.89 1 22.14
8 Approach slab corbel 2.700 1.35 3.65 1 2.70
9 Approach slab corbel 1.350 1.35 1.82 0.00
10 Total 137.69 100.65
11 Erath Pressure Moment (T-m) 399.949 1.5 599.92 t-m 1 399.95 t-m

ASOM PWRD AXOM MALA PROJECT

Feedback Infra Pvt. Ltd. Design of Abutment

ULTIMATE Limit State Eccentricity due to distance between bearing center and abutment stem center = -150 mm
SUMMARY OF LOADS AT CENTRE OF PILE CAP TOP FOR ENTIRE WIDTH OF ABUTMENTS Dry Case SKEW ANGLE= 0 º
Vertical Horizontal Horizontal Transverse
Sl. No. Description Long. Moment Factor for ULS
Load load-long. load-trans. moment
1 Overturning & stabilsing loads 166.91 256.29 685.26 1.5
2 Dead loads from superstructure
Girder+Deck slab 272.15 -40.82 0.00 1.35
SIDL 27.84 -4.18 0.00 1.35
WC 34.41 -5.16 0.00 1.75
Live loads (Max load) 179.42 0.00 170.44 1.5
(Max Long Moment) 173.33 0.00 129.99 1.5
(Max Trans Moment) 113.52 0.00 334.88 1.5
Braking loads 5.81 43.88 0.00 157.06 0.00
Totals 686.54 300.17 0.00 792.16 334.88
TRAFFIC DIRECTION

Θ
Combi-1 DL + SIDL + WC + LL (Case1) +EP+SUR+ BF 686.54 300.17 0.00 792.16 170.44

Combi-2 DL + SIDL + WC + LL (Case2) + EP+SUR+BF 680.45 300.17 0.00 792.16 129.99

Combi-3 DL + SIDL + WC + LL (Case3) + EP+SUR+BF 620.64 300.17 0.00 792.16 334.88

SUMMARY OF LOADS AT CENTRE OF PILE CAP TOP FOR ENTIRE WIDTH OF ABUTMENTS HFL Case SKEW ANGLE= 0 º
Vertical Horizontal Horizontal Transverse
Sl. No. Description Long. Moment
Load load-long. load-trans. moment
1 Overturning & stabilsing loads 137.69 242.27 599.92
2 Dead loads from superstructure
Girder+Deck slab 272.15 -40.82 0.00
SIDL 27.84 -4.18 0.00
WC 34.41 -5.16 0.00
Live loads (Max load) 179.42 0.00 170.44
(Max Long Moment) 173.33 0.00 129.99
(Max Trans Moment) 113.52 0.00 334.88
Braking loads 5.81 43.88 0.00 157.06 0.00
Totals 944.16 286.16 0.00 706.83 334.88

ASOM PWRD AXOM MALA PROJECT

Feedback Infra Pvt. Ltd. Design of Abutment

Combi-1 DL + SIDL + WC + LL (Case1) +EP+SUR+ BF 657.32 286.16 0.00 706.83 170.44

Combi-2 DL + SIDL + WC + LL (Case2) + EP+SUR+BF 651.23 286.16 0.00 706.83 129.99

Combi-3 DL + SIDL + WC + LL (Case3) + EP+SUR+BF 591.42 286.16 0.00 706.83 334.88

Seismic Case:
Final Loads and Bending Moments at the centre of base are as below
Total Vertical Load = 123.638 T
Total Moment = -1452.6 t-m Against OTM

SUMMARY OF LOADS AT CENTRE OF BASE FOR ENTIRE WIDTH OF ABUTMENTS SKEW ANGLE= 0 º
Vertical Horizontal Horizontal Transverse
Sl. No. Description Long. Moment
Load load-long. load-trans. moment
1 Overturning & stabilsing loads 166.91 170.86 456.84
2 Dead loads from superstructure
Girder+Deck slab 272.15 -40.82 0.00 TRAFFIC
SIDL 27.84 -4.18 0.00 Θ
WC 34.41 -5.16 0.00
Live loads (Max load) 23.92 0.00 34.09
(Max Long Moment) 34.67 0.00 26.00
(Max Trans Moment) 22.70 0.00 66.98
Braking loads 0.46 3.49 12.49 0.00 Considering 20% of live load and braking as ULS Case

3 Seismic (Horizontal-long) 73.098 117.120 0.000 602.338 0.000

4 Seismic (Horizontal-trans) 219.294 0.000 240.122 0.000 1047.391
Long+0.3*Trans+0.3*vertical 138.89 117.12 72.04 602.34 314.22
0.3*Long+Trans+0.3*vertical 241.22 35.14 240.12 180.70 1047.39
0.3*Long+0.3*Trans+vertical 87.72 35.14 72.04 180.70 314.22
DL+SIDL+0.2LL+0.2Breaking+Seismic Vertical 613.04 209.48 72.04 599.87 381.19
DL+SIDL+0.2LL+0.2Breaking+Seismic Long 664.21 291.47 72.04 1021.50 381.19
DL+SIDL+0.2LL+0.2Breaking+Seismic Trans 766.55 209.48 240.12 599.87 1114.37

ASOM PWRD AXOM MALA PROJECT

Feedback Infra Pvt. Ltd. Design of Abutment

Rare Limit State Eccentricity due to distance between bearing center and abutment stem center = -150 mm
SUMMARY OF LOADS AT CENTRE OF PILE CAP TOP FOR ENTIRE WIDTH OF ABUTMENTS Dry Case SKEW ANGLE= 0 º

Vertical Horizontal Horizontal Transverse

Sl. No. Description Long. Moment
Load load-long. load-trans. moment

1 Overturning & stabilsing loads 123.64 170.86 456.84

2 Dead loads from superstructure

Girder+Deck slab 201.59 -30.24 0.00
SIDL 20.63 -3.09 0.00
WC 19.66 -2.95 0.00
Live loads (Max load) 119.61 0.00 170.44
(Max Long Moment) 115.55 0.00 129.99
(Max Trans Moment) 75.68 0.00 334.88 TRAFFIC DIRECTION

Braking loads 3.87 29.26 0.00 104.71 0.00

Θ
Totals 489.00 200.12 0.00 525.27 334.88

Combi-1 DL + SIDL + WC + LL (Case1) +EP+SUR+ BF 489.00 200.12 0.00 561.55 170.44

Combi-2 DL + SIDL + WC + LL (Case2) + EP+SUR+BF 484.94 200.12 0.00 525.27 129.99

Combi-3 DL + SIDL + WC + LL (Case3) + EP+SUR+BF 445.07 200.12 0.00 525.27 334.88

SUMMARY OF LOADS AT CENTRE OF PILE CAP TOP FOR ENTIRE WIDTH OF ABUTMENTS HFL Case SKEW ANGLE= 0.00 m
Vertical Horizontal Horizontal Transverse
Sl. No. Description Long. Moment
Load load-long. load-trans. moment
1 Overturning & stabilsing loads 100.65 161.51 399.95
2 Dead loads from superstructure
Girder+Deck slab 201.59 -30.24 0.00
SIDL 20.63 -3.09 0.00
WC 19.66 -2.95 0.00
Live loads (Max load) 119.61 0.00 170.44
(Max Long Moment) 115.55 0.00 129.99
(Max Trans Moment) 75.68 0.00 334.88
Braking loads 3.87 29.26 0.00 104.71 0.00
Totals 657.24 190.77 0.00 468.38 635.32

ASOM PWRD AXOM MALA PROJECT

Feedback Infra Pvt. Ltd. Design of Abutment

Combi-1 DL + SIDL + WC + LL (Case1) +EP+SUR+ BF 466.01 190.77 0.00 468.38 170.44

Combi-2 DL + SIDL + WC + LL (Case2) + EP+SUR+BF 461.95 190.77 0.00 468.38 129.99

Combi-3 DL + SIDL + WC + LL (Case3) + EP+SUR+BF 422.08 190.77 0.00 468.38 334.88

Quasi Limit State Eccentricity due to distance between bearing center and abutment stem center = -150.00 mm
SUMMARY OF LOADS AT CENTRE OF PILE CAP TOP FOR ENTIRE WIDTH OF ABUTMENTS Dry Case SKEW ANGLE= 0.00 m

Vertical Horizontal Horizontal Transverse

Sl. No. Description Long. Moment
Load load-long. load-trans. moment

1 Overturning & stabilsing loads 123.64 170.86 456.84

2 Dead loads from superstructure
Girder+Deck slab 201.59 -30.24 0.00
SIDL 20.63 -3.09 0.00
WC 19.66 -2.95 0.00
Live loads (Max load) 0.00 0.00 0.00
(Max Long Moment) 0.00 0.00 0.00
(Max Trans Moment) 0.00 0.00 0.00
Braking loads 0.00 0.00 0.00 TRAFFIC DIRECTION
Totals 365.52 170.86 420.56 0.00
Θ

Combi-1 DL + SIDL + WC + LL (Case1) +EP+SUR+ BF 365.52 170.86 0.00 420.56 0.00

Combi-2 DL + SIDL + WC + LL (Case2) + EP+SUR+BF 365.52 170.86 0.00 420.56 0.00

Combi-3 DL + SIDL + WC + LL (Case3) + EP+SUR+BF 365.52 170.86 0.00 420.56 0.00

ASOM PWRD AXOM MALA PROJECT

Feedback Infra Pvt. Ltd. Design of Abutment

SUMMARY OF LOADS AT CENTRE OF PILE CAP TOP FOR ENTIRE WIDTH OF ABUTMENTS HFL Case SKEW ANGLE= 0.00 m
Vertical Horizontal Horizontal Transverse
Sl. No. Description Long. Moment
Load load-long. load-trans. moment
1 Overturning & stabilsing loads 100.65 161.51 399.95
2 Dead loads from superstructure
Girder+Deck slab 201.59 -30.24 0.00
SIDL 20.63 -3.09 0.00
WC 19.66 -2.95 0.00
Live loads (Max load) 0.00 0.00 0.00
(Max Long Moment) 0.00 0.00 0.00
(Max Trans Moment) 0.00 0.00 0.00
Braking loads 0.00 0.00 0.00
Totals 342.52 161.51 363.67 0.00

Combi-1 DL + SIDL + WC + LL (Case1) +EP+SUR+ BF 342.52 161.51 0.00 363.67 0.00

Combi-2 DL + SIDL + WC + LL (Case2) + EP+SUR+BF 342.52 161.51 0.00 363.67 0.00

Combi-3 DL + SIDL + WC + LL (Case3) + EP+SUR+BF 342.52 161.51 0.00 363.67 0.00

ASOM PWRD AXOM MALA PROJECT

Feedback Infra Pvt. Ltd. Design of Abutment

: DESIGN OF RECTANGULAR SECTION FOR ABUTMENT SHAFT - ULTIMATE LIMIT STATE

Traffic direction

900
354.5 Section dimensions of pier shaft
As1 Length, B = 12000 mm ( equivalent length of pier shaft)
Thickness,D = 900 mm DESIGN AS WALL, NEGLECT AXIAL VALUE
0.1*fcd*Ac = 1688.4 Ton As clause 7.6.4.1 IRC 112,2011
Material properties
fck = 35 Mpa
fyk = 500 Mpa
12000 As3 As4 11855 Es = 200000 Mpa
fctm = 2.8 Mpa
Design axial resistance of section
NRd = Ac * fcd + As * fyd
fcd = acc xfck /gm acc = 0.67
= 15.633 Mpa gm = 1.5
As2 fyd = fyk/gs gs = 1.15
NA = 434.783 Mpa
Xu NRd = 19373.3 ton
Reinforcement Details
Spacing From Actual
Reinf. Dia.(mm) (mm) Cover (mm) (mm) To (mm) YCG (mm) Nos. Spacing Remarks
As1 16 200 50 208 562.5 281.25 3.00 177.25
As2 16 200 50 208 562.5 281.25 3.00 177.25
As3 25 150 75 87.5 11942 5971.00 81.00 148.18
As4 16 150 50 58 11913 5956.25 81.00 148.18

Total reinforcement
As3 (Along length Tension face) = 39760.8 mm2
As4 (Along length Compression face) = 16286.02 mm2
As2 (Along width Tension face) = 603.19 mm2
As1 (Along width Compression face) = 603.19 mm2 Horizontal reinforcement = 1168 mm2
As clause 16.3.2
Total As = 57253.2 mm2 900 mm2
Maximum neutral axis depth = 0.53 %
0.0035 Provide 12 dia 150 c/c as horizontal
x u,max =
0.87 . f y = 0.617 Actual Reinforcement = 4750.1 mm2 OK
0.0035 +
d ES
x u,max = 0.617 d
Effective depth at transverse direction = 8854.5 mm

Minimum & Maximum Vertical Reinforcement as per IRC 112:2014

Min. Area of reinforcement = 0.24%
Max. Area of reinforcement = 4%
Min compresion reinforcement = 0.12%
Mu(

ASOM PWRD AXOM MALA PROJECT

Feedback Infra Pvt. Ltd. Design of Abutment

Ultimate Limit State of Strength : Component Design

Overall Check
Depth of Depth of Ast
Clear Clear Depth Effective for Ast prov
Moment ,Mu(Long) X ulim NA as NA as Ast min Bar dia spacing prov
Cover Cover Provide Depth overrei (Trans)
(with Partial Safety Mu(Trans) per Ast per Ast (Long)
Load case (Earth (NonEart d nforced
factor)
face) h face)
Long Trans
Reinfor. Rein.
(t-m) (t-m) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm 2 ) (mm) (mm) (mm 2 ) (mm 2 )
under
Pmax 792.16 170.44 75 50 900 813 501 114 1098 14218 25 150 39761 28627
reinforc
under
Basic MLmax 792.16 129.99 75 50 900 813 501 114 1098 reinforc 14218 25 150 39761 28627
ed
under
Mtmax 792.16 334.88 75 50 900 813 501 114 1098 14218 25 150 39761 28627
reinforc
under
Pmax 706.83 170.44 75 50 900 813 501 114 1098 14218 25 150 39761 28627
reinforc
under
HFL CASE MLmax 706.83 129.99 75 50 900 813 501 114 1098 14218 25 150 39761 28627
reinforc
under
Mtmax 706.83 334.88 75 50 900 813 501 114 1098 14218 25 150 39761 28627
reinforc
under
Pmax 806.51 381.19 75 50 900 813 501 114 1098 14218 25 150 39761 28627
reinforc
under
Seismic MLmax 1228.15 381.19 75 50 900 813 501 114 1098 14218 25 150 39761 28627
reinforc
under
Mtmax 806.51 1114.37 75 50 900 813 501 114 1098 14218 25 150 39761 28627
reinforc

ASOM PWRD AXOM MALA PROJECT

Feedback Infra Pvt. Ltd. Design of Abutment

Reinforcement Check
Moment Check Moment Check
Area of Area of
of for of for
steel steel
Section Moment to be resisted (t-m) resistanc Moment resistance Moment
provided provided
e long of trans of
(t-m) mm2 Long (t-m) mm2 Trans
Pmax 792.16 170.44 1322.20 39760.8 OK 4938.74 28626.58 OK

Basic MLmax 792.16 129.99 1322.20 39760.8 OK 4938.74 28626.58 OK

Mtmax 792.16 334.88 1322.20 39760.8 OK 4938.74 28626.58 OK

Pmax 706.83 170.44 1322.20 39760.8 OK 4938.74 28626.58 OK

HFL CASE MLmax 706.83 129.99 1322.20 39760.8 OK 4938.74 28626.58 OK

Mtmax 706.83 334.88 1322.20 39760.8 OK 4938.74 28626.58 OK

Pmax 806.51 381.19 1322.20 39760.8 OK 4938.74 28626.58 OK

Seismic MLmax 1228.15 381.19 1322.20 39760.8 OK 4938.74 28626.58 OK

Mtmax 806.51 1114.37 1322.20 39760.8 OK 4938.74 28626.58 OK

Shear check in abutment stem

Total height of shaft = 2.579 m
Total depth at base = 900 mm
Effective depth at base = 800.5 mm
Critical section from top = 1.7785 m

Normal Case
Force in abutment stem = 148.21 Ton Including surcharge and Earth pressure

Shear Check
fck = 35 Fe = 500
Shear
N ED Design
Design K= V min = Min. Resistan
Shear β = αv/ 2d Shear , Ast prov d provided deff 0 (axial σ cp ρ1 V Rd.c
V Rdc
Shear
ce
1+(200/d) 0.031K 3/2 Resist.
Section force)
βV ED .5
x fck 1/2 Check

(t/m) (t/m) (mm 2 ) (mm) (mm) (mm) Mpa (t) Mpa (t) (t) (t/m)
No
Bottom of
148.21 1.00 148.21 39760.78 900 800.5 1.500 0.337 0.00 0.00 0.004 395.59 329.87 395.59 Shear
STEM
Reinforc

ASOM PWRD AXOM MALA PROJECT

Feedback Infra Pvt. Ltd. Design of Abutment

: DESIGN OF RECTANGULAR SECTION FOR ABUTMENT SHAFT - SERVIVIBILITY LIMIT STATE

Limit State of Sevicibility :
2
Grade of concrete fck = M-35 N/mm
0.67 2
Tensile Strength of Concrete = 0.259*(fck) = 2.80 N/mm
Grade of steel fy = 500 N/mm 2
2
Modulus of elasticity of steel Es = 200000 N/mm
Depth of shaft = 900 mm
Clear cover for non earth side = 50 mm
Clear cover for earth side = 75 mm
Partial safety factor for concrete (basic & seismic) γm = 1.50
Partial safety factor for Steel (basic & seismic) γs = 1.15
0.3 2
Modulus of elasticity of concrete=22*(fcm/12.5) E ceff = 32308.25 N/mm
Creep Coefficient (taking long term of creep) f = 1.54

Maximum permissible stress (IRC :112-2011 ,Cl. 12.2)

Quasi-Permanent
Permissible Stress in Concrete 0.36*fck = 12.60 Mpa
Permissible Stress in Steel = 300.0 Mpa
Rare combination
Permissible Stress in Concrete 0.48*fck = 16.80 Mpa
Permissible Stress in Steel = 300 Mpa

ASOM PWRD AXOM MALA PROJECT

Feedback Infra Pvt. Ltd. Design of Abutment

Limit State of Sevicibility :

Long Overall depth Effec. MI whole Stress Long Ast

Clear Cover Moment for Trans Moment provided Depth section assuming Section check Moment for provided
Clear Cover Uncracked
Load case earth face
Non earth Rare for Rare Long QP
face Combinatio Combinations Section Combination
ns (mm) (mm) (mm4) Mpa s (mm 2 )
Pmax 75 50 561.55 170.44 900 813 1.296E+14 0.02 uncracked 420.56 39760.8
Basic MLmax 75 50 525.27 129.99 900 813 1.296E+14 0.02 uncracked 420.56 39760.8
Mtmax 75 50 525.27 334.88 900 813 1.296E+14 0.02 uncracked 420.56 39760.8
Pmax 75 50 468.38 170.44 900 813 1.296E+14 0.02 uncracked 363.67 39760.8
HFL CASE MLmax 75 50 468.38 129.99 900 813 1.296E+14 0.02 uncracked 363.67 39760.8
Mtmax 75 50 468.38 334.88 900 813 1.296E+14 0.02 uncracked 363.67 39760.8

- AsEs + (A s E s ) 2 + 2bA s E s E ceff d

Depth of concrete compression: dc =
b E ceff

Moment of inertia for cracked section 1

I cr = mA s (d- d c ) 2 + b dc
3
3

Compressive Stresses at top M

σ cr,top =
Zc

Tensile Stress at level of Steel Me m

σs =
Zs

ASOM PWRD AXOM MALA PROJECT

Feedback Infra Pvt. Ltd. Design of Abutment

Calculation of Stresses for Long Term Rare Combinations

Eceff= Depth of Moment of

(Mqp + Stress in
Mst)*Ecm/Mst + Modular concrete inertia for Stress in
Load case M qp M ST M RARE Concret
(1+Ф)Mqp ratio compress cracked Steel, MPa
e, MPa
ion dc section, Icr
Pmax 420.56 141.0 561.55 15013 13.3 227.29 1.7143E+10 5.59 191.70
Basic MLmax 420.56 104.7 525.27 14478 13.8 230.77 1.7014E+10 5.16 179.60
Mtmax 420.56 104.7 525.27 14478 13.8 230.77 1.7014E+10 5.16 179.60
Pmax 363.67 104.7 468.38 14724 13.6 229.15 1.7074E+10 4.63 160.03
HFL CASE MLmax 363.67 104.7 468.38 14724 13.6 229.15 1.7074E+10 4.63 160.03
Mtmax 363.67 104.7 468.38 14724 13.6 229.15 1.7074E+10 4.63 160.03

Calcualtion of Stresses for Quasipermanent Combinations

Depth of Moment of
Eceff= Stress in
Modular concrete Inertia for Stress in
Load case Mqp Ecm/ Concrete,
ratio compressio cracked Steel, MPa
(1+ f ) MPa
n dc section Icr

Pmax 420.56 12729 15.71 243.42 1.655E+10 3.94 144.62

Basic MLmax 420.56 12729 15.71 243.42 1.655E+10 3.94 144.62
Mtmax 420.56 12729 15.71 243.42 1.655E+10 3.94 144.62
Pmax 363.67 12729 15.71 243.42 1.655E+10 3.40 125.06
HFL CASE MLmax 363.67 12729 15.71 243.42 1.655E+10 3.40 125.06
Mtmax 363.67 12729 15.71 243.42 1.655E+10 3.40 125.06

ASOM PWRD AXOM MALA PROJECT

Feedback Infra Pvt. Ltd. Design of Abutment

Servicibility Stress Check

Long Term RARE QUASI PERMANENT QUASI PERMANENT

Long Term RARE COMBINATION :
COMBINATION : COMBINATION : COMBINATION :
Load case Combined Tensile Stress at level of
Combined Compression Stresses Combined Compression Stresses at Combined Tensile Stress at level
Steel (in Mpa)
at top (in Mpa) top (in Mpa) of Steel
Pmax 5.59 <16.8 Okay 191.70 <300 Okay 3.94 <12.6 Okay 144.62 <300 Okay
Basic MLmax 5.16 <16.8 Okay 179.60 <300 Okay 3.94 <12.6 Okay 144.62 <300 Okay
Mtmax 5.16 <16.8 Okay 179.60 <300 Okay 3.94 <12.6 Okay 144.62 <300 Okay
Pmax 4.63 <16.8 Okay 160.03 <300 Okay 3.40 <12.6 Okay 125.06 <300 Okay
HFL CASE MLmax 4.63 <16.8 Okay 160.03 <300 Okay 3.40 <12.6 Okay 125.06 <300 Okay
Mtmax 4.63 <16.8 Okay 160.03 <300 Okay 3.40 <12.6 Okay 125.06 <300 Okay

Crack Width Check

Crack width
Section
(mm)
Aceff ρeff Esm-Ecm Фeff Srmax
Crack width, wk = S r.max ( ε sm - ε cm )
Pmax 218750 0.182 0.00057 25 278 0.160 Okay
( As per 12.3.4 of IRC 112-2011 )
σ sc - k t f ct,eff 1+ αe ρ p,eff
Basic MLmax 218750 0.182 0.00057 25 278 0.160 Okay
ε sm - ε cm = ρ p,eff
Es
Mtmax 218750 0.182 0.00057 25 278 0.160 Okay

> = 0.6 σ sc
Pmax 218750 0.182 0.00048 25 278 0.133 Okay
Es

HFL CASE MLmax 218750 0.182 0.00048 25 278 0.133 Okay

Mtmax 218750 0.182 0.00048 25 278 0.133 Okay

ASOM PWRD AXOM MALA PROJECT

Feedback Infra Pvt. Ltd. Design of Abutment

Design of Abutment Cap

As the cap is fully supported on the abutment shaft, minimum thickness of the cap required as per Clause 710.8.7 of IRC : 78- 2014 is 225 mm
However the thickness of abutment cap is kept as 1.00 m

Assuming a cap thickness of 225 mm

area of abutment cap = 225 x 1110.0000
= 249750 mm^3
Quantity of steel = 1 % of area
= 1 x 249750 = 2497.5 mm^2
100
Steel required

Provide 6 bar of 16 mm dia bar as longitudinal steel on top face of abutment cap. ( Provided steel = 1206.37 mm^2
Provide 5 bar of 16 mm dia bar as longitudinal steel on bottom face of abutment cap. ( Provided steel = 1005.31 mm^2
Provide 5 bar of 16 mm dia bar as longitudinal steel onside face of abutment cap. ( Provided steel = 1005.31 mm^2
Total Steel = 3216.99 mm^2 OK

ASOM PWRD AXOM MALA PROJECT

Feedback Infra Pvt. Ltd. Design of Abutment

DESIGN OF DIRT WALL

Dirt wall will be designed as a vertical cantilever.

Surcharge Pressure
0.279 x 2.00 x 1.20 = 0.67 t/m^2

0.67

2.460 m

1.37 kN/m^2

Earth Pressure Diagram

Intensity for = 0.279 x 2.00 x 1.20 = 0.67 t/m^2

rectangular portion

F1 = 0.67 x 2.46 x 12.00 = 19.79 t

Intensity for = 0.28 x 2.00 x 2.46 = 1.37 t/m^2

triangular portion

F2 = 0.50 x 1.37 x 2.46 x 12.00 = 20.29 t

Total F = 19.79 + 20.29 = 40.08 t

Moment @ RL 62.240 m (at dirt wall base)

M1 = 19.79 x 1.23 = 24.35 t.m

M2 = 20.29 x 1.03 = 20.96 t.m (Centre of pr. considered at an elevation of 0.42m

of the ht. of the abutment shaft as per cl. 217.1 of
Total M (at dirt wall base) = 45.31 t.m IRC 6

HL = 40.08 t ML = 45.31 t.m

Considering 40Ton Bogie axle Load on dirt wall :

100 100
Dispersed width = 6.52 m
Load per met width = 200 2.13 1.93
6.52
= 30.67 KN/m
Impact factor = 1.25
Total load with I.F = 38.34 KN/m
Braking force = 0.20 x 200
= 40 KN 2.46
Point of application of braking force
= 2.46 + 1.20
= 3.66 m
Moment due to Braking = 40 x 3.66 2.13 1.93 2.46
= 146.40 KN-m

Total moment at the base of dirt wall ULS = 679.63 + 219.60 KN-m

= 679.63 + 219.60 = 90.32 kN.m/m

12.00 6.52

Thickness of dirtwall = 0.30 m

Adorting clear cover on either face = 75.00 mm

ASOM PWRD AXOM MALA PROJECT

Feedback Infra Pvt. Ltd. Design of Abutment

Design of Dirtwall
Grade of concrete = M 35
Grade of Steel = Fe 500
2
Youngs modulus of Concrete, Ec = 32308 N/mm
Youngs modulus of Steel, Es = 200000 Mpa
n Neutral axis depth = 0.0035/(0.0035+(0.87*500/200000+0.002)) = 0.456
j Lever arm = 1-(0.42*0.456) = 0.808
Q Moment of resistance = 0.36*35*0.456*0.808 = 4.640

Ultimate Limit State

Partial Safety Factor for earth pressure = 1.5
Partial Safety Factor for Live Load = 1.5
Main reinforcement
Max BM due to earth pressure at the bottom of dirt wall = 9.032 T-m
Depth required, d = sqrt(M/Qb) = 140 mm
Effective Depth Provided = 219 mm
Hence Safe

Area of steel required

2
Ast = 0.5 fck b d/fyk (1-(sqrt(1-4.6M/fck b d2) 1016.00 mm
Astmin (greater of below as per CL 16.5.1.1 of IRC: 112 - 2011)
2
Astmin= 0.26 fctm bt d/fyk = 316 mm
2
Astmin=0.0013 bt d = 285 mm
2
Astmin = 316 mm
Diameter of bar Provided = 12 mm
Area of one bar = 3.142*12^2/4 = 113.0 mm
Spacing of bars required = 113/1016*1000 = 112 mm
Spacing of bars provided = 120 mm
120 > 112 mm Unsafe

Area of Reinforcemnt provided = 942.5 mm

Distribution Reinforcement
Diameter of Bar Provided = 10 mm
Spacing of Bar Provided = 200 Nos.
Area of distribution Reinf. provided = 393 mm 2
Distribution Reinf. To be Provided 20% of main = 188 mm 2
2
393 > 188 mm Hence Safe

Servicibility Limit State

Partial Safety Factor for Live Load = 1
Maximum Bending Moment = 6.02 tm
Effective Depth = 219 mm
Modulus of Elasticity of Steel, mpa = 200000 MPa
Modulus of Elasticity of conc(short term) = 32308 MPa
Depth of Conc Compression = 45.05 mm
MI of Cracked Section = 3.3E+07 mm
Compressive Stress in Concrete = 13.10 MPa
Hence Safe

Tensile Stress in Steel = 313.19 MPa

CHECK

ASOM PWRD AXOM MALA PROJECT

Feedback Infra Pvt. Ltd. Design of Abutment

DESIGN OF RETURN WALL

soil properties
density 20.00
F fill soil 30.00
delta 20.00
earth pressure coeff ka 0.279
equivalent fluid density 5.59
density as per IRC 6-2017
cl. 217.1 4.80
concrete
grade of conc 35
density 24.00
rectangular part
(slab fixed at two adjacent edges)table 26/11a free
width a 2.25
depth b 6.04
thickness 0.500
b/2= 3.020 <a
loads
earth pressure at bottom 33.744 b free
ll surcharge 6.705
analysis (ref. Roark & Young)
a/b 0.373

rectangular loading a
beta1 0.348
beta2 0.393
max. stress (along b) 340.016
max. stress (along a) 384.866
moment about a mz1 31.877
moment about b mx1 96.842
triangular loading
beta1 0.210
beta2 0.147
max. stress (along b) 1032.51
max. stress (along a) 723.57
moment about a mz2 96.798
moment about b mx2 182.069
total moment
SLS moment about a mz1+mz2 128.674
SLS moment about b mx1+mx2 278.911

ULS moment about a 183.448

ULS moment about b 389.313

ASOM PWRD AXOM MALA PROJECT

Feedback Infra Pvt. Ltd. Design of Abutment

DESIGN OF Retaining Wall

The basic stress value is as per Table 6.5 of IRC 112

Chararcteristic Strength of Concrete, fck = M 35 Mpa (Table 6.5, IRC:112-2011)
Yield Strength of Steel, fy = Fe 500 Mpa (Table 18.1,IRC:112-2011)
Partial safety factor for concrete (basic & seismic) γm = 1.5
Partial safety factor for Steel (basic & seismic) γs = 1.15
Partial safety factor for concrete (accidental comb.) γm = 1.2
Partial safety factor for Steel (accidental comb.) γs = 1
Compressive concrete strength = fck+10 fcm = 45.0 Mpa (Table 6.5, IRC:112-2011)
0.67
Axial Tensile Strength of Concrete = 0.259*(fck) fctm = 2.8 Mpa (Table 6.5, IRC:112-2011)
Ultimate compressive strain in the concrete εcu3 = 0.035 (Table 6.5, IRC:112-2011)
Modulus of elasticity of concrete=22*(fcm/12.5)0.3 Ecm = 32000 Mpa (Table 6.5, IRC:112-2011)
Modulus of elasticity of reinf. of steel Es = 200000 Mpa
Design yield strength of shear reinforcement fywd = 434.8 Mpa
Creep Coefficient φ = 1.0 Table 6.9 It is covered with earth
fywd = fyk/ γm (As per amendment of CL.10.3.1 IRC:112-2011)
Modulus of Elasticity of Concrete considering Long Term Creep = 16000
Modular ratio αe = (Es/Ec) αe = 12.50
Ultimate tensile strain in the steel εs = 0.0042
εs = [{fy/(gs xEs)}+0.002]

Coeffic to consider the influence of concrete strength α = 0.67 A2.10 Page : 244 of 112

Factor (λ) λ = 0.8 0.8 Up to fck

Factor (η) η = 1 1.0 Up to fck ≤ 60Mpa,Eq.A2-35,

IRC:112
Design Compressive strength fcd = 0.447fck
α * f ck f cd = 15.633 N/mm2
f cd =
gm
0.0035
Basic & Seismic xu,max=
87 . fy = 0.617 or xu,max= 0.617 d
Condition, 0.0055 +
d ES
fck b d 4.6 Mu
Astreqd. = 1- 1-
Qlim = 0.36.fck(Xmax /d ) x [1- 0.42 (Xmax /d)] = 5.758 2 fy fck b d2

Width of Slab,b = 2250 mm Horizontal

= 6039 mm Vertical

ASOM PWRD AXOM MALA PROJECT

Feedback Infra Pvt. Ltd. Design of Abutment

Ultimate Limit State of Strength : Component Design

spacing
Moment ,Mu Effective Depth
Overall Depth Required ,d Xumax =
(with Partial Safety Clear Cover Depth Mulim Ast Req Ast min Bar dia Ast prov Ast
Section Provided = 0.617d
factor) Check Check
( Mu/(Qlim x
0.5
b)) Provided
2 2 2
(t-m) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (t-m) (mm ) (mm ) (mm) (mm) (mm )
160
12
Wall
18.34 75 500 119 419 Okay 258.4 231.9 1023 1373 1590 OK
vertical 160
0
140
20
Wall_Hor
38.93 75 500 106 415 Okay 255.9 610.7 2185 3649 5049 OK
izontal 140
0

Section Under/Over Reinforced Check Moment Offered by Steel Reinforcement at Comp. Face
Neutral Axis Moment of
Max Neutral
Depth as per Ast Moment to resistance
Ast prov Axis Depth Moment of Min steel Bar dia Spacing Ast prov
Prov
Section be resisted offered by resistance Ast
Section Xumax = Section
xu= Check steel offered by Check
0.617d
steel check
(0.87fy*Ast)/
(mm2) (mm) (t-m) (t-m) mm2 mm mm mm2
(0.36*fck*b)

10 150 3162
under Wall
Wall vertical 1590 258.4 24.40 18.34 28.28 OK 318
reinforced vertical
0 150

10 150 1178
under Wall_Horiz
Wall_Horizontal 5049 255.9 28.86 38.93 88.48 OK 1010
reinforced ontal
0 150

ASOM PWRD AXOM MALA PROJECT

Feedback Infra Pvt. Ltd. Design of Abutment

Minimum Reinforcement as per IRC:78-2014 Cl. 707.2.8 Tranverse Reinforcement (As per Cl. 16.6.1.1 of IRC 112-2011)

Minimum Reinforcement as per IRC:78-2014 Cl. 707.2.8 Minimum Reinforcement as per IRC:78-2014 Cl. 707.2.8
Section 2 Provided, Section
250mm per Provided 20% of Main Provided Steel Area
Bar dia, mm Check Bar dia, mm Check
metre Spacing, mm mm2 Reinf. Spacing, Provided,
12 160 10 150
Wall vertical 563 1590 OK Wall vertical 563 1178 OK
0 160 0 150
20 140 10 150
Wall_Horizontal 563 5049 OK Wall_Horizontal 563 3162 OK
0 140 0 150

ASOM PWRD AXOM MALA PROJECT

Feedback Infra Pvt. Ltd. Design of Abutment

Limit State of Servicibility :

Maximum permissible stress (IRC :112-2011 ,Cl. 12.2)

Frequent/Quasi-Permanent
Permissible Stress in Concrete 0.36*fck = 12.60 Mpa
Permissible Stress in Steel fy /γs = 300.0 Mpa
Rare combination
Permissible Stress in Concrete 0.48*FCK = 16.80 Mpa
Permissible Stress in Steel 0.6 fy = 300 Mpa (As per Ammendment No.1 IRC:112, August 2013)

(As per cl. 12.2.1 IRC 112-2011)

Top &
Ast
Effective Depth Provided Overall depth provided Bar dia spacing Bottom
Moment, Moment provided
stress= Section
Section Clear Cover Rare Quasipermanent
M*Y/I={M*( check
combination Combinations
D/2)}/{(b*D
(mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm2)
^3)/12}

75 12.87 9.68 419 500 12 160 1590.4 1.37

Wall vertical Uncracked
0 160
75 27.89 18.21 415 500 20 140 5049.0 1.11
Wall_Horizontal Uncracked
0 140

ASOM PWRD AXOM MALA PROJECT

Feedback Infra Pvt. Ltd. Design of Abutment

2
- AsEs + (AsEs) + 2bAsEsEceff d
Depth of concrete compression: dc =
b Eceff

Moment of inertia for cracked section 1 Eceff

Icr = As(d- dc)2+ b dc3
3 Es

Compressive Stresses at top M Eceff

σcr,top =
Zc Es

Tensile Stress at level of Steel Me d

σs =
Zs

Stresses for Rare Combinations Stresses for Quasi-Permanent Combinations

Tensile
Depth of Tensile Depth of Moment of Compressi
Moment of Stress at
concrete Compr Stresses Stress at level concrete Inertia for on
Section inertia for Check Check Eceff Check level of Check
compression in Concrete, Mpa of Steel in compressio cracked Stresses
section, Icr Steel in
dc Mpa n dc section Icr in Mpa
Mpa

Wall vertical 56.59 230633722 5.05 OK 202.20 OK 16000 77.67 260734722 2.31 OK 126.72 OK

Wall_Horizontal 60.84 705816118 3.85 OK 139.95 OK 16000 83.27 590256847 2.05 OK 102.32 OK

ASOM PWRD AXOM MALA PROJECT

Feedback Infra Pvt. Ltd. Design of Abutment

Crack Width Check

Crack width, wk = Sr.max ( εsm- εcm) ( As per 12.3.4 of IRC 112-2011 )
Crack width
Section
(mm)
fct,eff
εsm - εcm
σsc - kt 1+αe ρp,eff
= ρp,eff > = 0.6 σsc
Wall vertical 0.251 <0.3 OK
Es Es
εsm = Mean strain in the reinforcement
εcm = Mean strain in concrete between cracks
0.67
fct,eff = 0.259*(fck)
ρp,eff = As / Ac,eff
Wall_Horizontal 0.252 <0.3 OK
αe = Es / Eceff 0.17 φ
Sr.max = 3.4 c +
σsc = Tensile Stress at level of Steel ρp,eff

ASOM PWRD AXOM MALA PROJECT

Feedback Infra Pvt. Ltd. Design of Abutment

Design of pedestal

As PER IRC 78 2014 710.10.3

C= C0*SQRT (A1/A2) = C0

Pedestal length = 800 mm

Pedestal width = 800 mm
Grade of pedestal = M 40 Mpa
Permissible direct compressive stress 19.2 Mpa
A1 = 640000 mm2
A2 = 1210000 mm2
C = 13.963636 Mpa
Load on bearing = 90.371915 Ton
Compressive stress = 1.4120612 Mpa < 13.963636 Ok

As per IRC 112, Longitudinal reinforcement = 960 mm2

One side = 480 mm2
Provide 12 dia 120 c/c 659.73446 mm2 Ok

ASOM PWRD AXOM MALA PROJECT