‫ﺗﺄﺛﯾر اﻟﺗﻛﯾﯾف اﻟﻣﻐﻧﺎطﯾﺳﻲ ﻟﺧواص ﻣﯾﺎﻩ اﻟري اﻟﻣﺎﻟﺣﺔ ﻓﻲ ﻧﻣو ﻣﺣﺻول اﻟذرة اﻟﺻﻔراء ‪Zea‬‬

‫)‪ (mays L.‬واﻟﻣﻣﺗص ﻣن ﻋﻧﺎﺻر اﻟﻧﺗروﺟﯾن واﻟﻔﺳﻔور واﻟﺑوﺗﺎﺳﯾوم‬

‫ﺑﺷرى ﻣﺣﻣود اﻟﺑطﺎوي‬

‫ﻛﻠﯾﺔ اﻟزراﻋﺔ‪ /‬ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺑﻐداد‬

‫اﻟﺧﻼﺻﺔ‬
‫اﺟرﯾت ﺗﺟرﺑﺔ ﺑﺎﯾوﻟوﺟﯾﺔ ﻓﻲ اﻟظﻠﺔ اﻟﺳﻠﻛﯾﺔ اﻟﺗﺎﺑﻌﺔ ﻟﻘﺳم اﻟﺗرﺑﺔ – ﻛﻠﯾﺔ اﻟزراﻋﺔ – ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺑﻐداد ﻓﻲ‬
‫‪Typic‬‬ ‫اﺻص ﺑﻼﺳﺗﯾﻛﯾﺔ ﺑﺎﺳﺗﻌﻣﺎل ﺗرﺑﺔ ﻣزﯾﺟﺔ طﯾﻧﯾﺔ ﻏرﯾﻧﯾﺔ ﻣﺻﻧﻔﺔ ﺿﻣن ﻣﺟﺎﻣﯾﻊ اﻟﺗرب اﻟﻌظﻣﻰ‬
‫‪ Torrifluvent‬اﺧذت ﺗرﺑﺔ ﻣن ﺣﻘول اﻟﻛﻠﯾﺔ ﻧﻔﺳﻬﺎ ‪ .‬ﺗم ﻣﻌﺎﻣﻠﺔ اﻟﺗرب ﺑﺎﻟﻣﻌﺎﻣﻼت اﻟﺳﻣﺎدﯾﺔ اﻟﺗﺎﻟﯾﺔ ‪ 240 :‬ﻛﻐم‬
‫‪1-‬‬ ‫‪1-‬‬
‫ﺑﺎﺳﺗﻌﻣﺎل ﺳﻣﺎد ﺳوﺑر ﻓوﺳﻔﺎت اﻟﺛﻼﺛﻲ‬ ‫ﺑﺎﺳﺗﻌﻣﺎل ﺳﻣﺎد اﻟﯾورﯾﺎ ) ‪ ( N% 46‬و‪ 75‬ﻛﻐم ‪. P‬ﻫﻛﺗﺎر‬ ‫‪ . N‬ﻫﻛﺗﺎر‬
‫‪1-‬‬
‫ﺑﺎﺳﺗﻌﻣﺎل ﺳﻣﺎد ﻛﺑرﯾﺗﺎت اﻟﺑوﺗﺎﺳﯾوم ) ‪ . ( K% 41.5‬زرع ﻣﺣﺻول‬ ‫) ‪ ( P% 21‬و ‪ 120‬ﻛﻐم ‪ . K‬ﻫﻛﺗﺎر‬
‫‪-‬‬
‫اﻟذرة اﻟﺻﻔراء ﻓﻲ اﻟﻌروة اﻟرﺑﯾﻌﯾﺔ ‪ 2007‬وﺗم اﻟﺳﻘﻲ ﺑﺎﻟﻣﺎء اﻟﻌﺎدي ذات اﻻﯾﺻﺎﻟﯾﺔ اﻟﻛﻬرﺑﺎﺋﯾﺔ ‪ 0.4‬دﯾﺳﯾﺳﯾﻣﻧز ‪ .‬م‬
‫‪1-‬‬
‫ﺗﺎرة اﺧرى وﺑﺎﻟﻣﯾﺎﻩ اﻟﻣذﻛورة ﻧﻔﺳﻬﺎ ﺑﻌد ﻣﻐﻧطﺗﻬﺎ ﺗﺎرة‬ ‫وﺑﻣﺎء ﻣﺑزل ذات اﯾﺻﺎﻟﯾﺔ ﻛﻬرﺑﺎﺋﯾﺔ ‪ 7.4‬دﯾﺳﯾﺳﯾﻣﻧز ‪ .‬م‬ ‫‪1‬‬

‫اﺧرى ﻻﯾﺻﺎل اﻟرطوﺑﺔ ﻓﻲ اﻟﺗرﺑﺔ اﻟﻰ ﺣدود اﻟﺳﻌﺔ اﻟﺣﻘﻠﯾﺔ ‪ .‬ﺑﻌد ‪ 10‬اﺳﺎﺑﯾﻊ ﻣن اﻟزراﻋﺔ ﺣﺻدت اﻟﻧﺑﺎﺗﺎت وﺗم‬
‫ﺗﻘدﯾر اطواﻟﻬﺎ واﻟوزن اﻟﺟﺎف ﻟﻠﺟزء اﻟﺧﺿري واﻟﻣﻣﺗص اﻟﻛﻠﻲ ﻣن ﻋﻧﺎﺻر اﻟﻧﺗروﺟﯾن واﻟﻔﺳﻔور واﻟﺑوﺗﺎﺳﯾوم ‪.‬‬
‫اظﻬرت اﻟﻧﺗﺎﺋﺞ ان اﺳﺗﻌﻣﺎل ﻣﺎء اﻟﺑزل اﻟﻣﺎﻟﺢ ادى اﻟﻰ اﻧﺧﻔﺎض ﻣﻌﻧوي ﻓﻲ ﺻﻔﺎت ﻣﻌدل طول اﻟﻧﺑﺎت واﻟوزن‬
‫اﻟﺟﺎف ﻟﻠﻣﺟﻣوع اﻟﺧﺿري واﻟﻣﻣﺗص اﻟﻛﻠﻲ ﻣن ﻋﻧﺎﺻر اﻟﻧﺗروﺟﯾن واﻟﻔﺳﻔور واﻟﺑوﺗﺎﺳﯾوم ﻣﻘﺎرﻧﺔ ﺑﺎﻟﻣﺎء اﻟﻌﺎدي‬
‫و ‪ 22.7‬و ‪ % 17.8‬ﻟﻠﺻﻔﺎت اﻟﻣذﻛورة ﻋﻠﻰ اﻟﺗواﻟﻲ ‪ .‬ﻓﻲ ﺣﯾن زاد‬ ‫وﺑﻧﺳب اﻧﺧﻔﺎض ‪ 10.8‬و ‪ 28.9‬و‪17.7‬‬
‫اﻟﻣﺎء اﻟﻣﻣﻐﻧط ﻣن ﺗﻠك اﻟﺻﻔﺎت ﻣﻌﻧوﯾﺎ ﻣﻘﺎرﻧﺔ ﺑﺎﻟﻣﺎء ﻏﯾر اﻟﻣﻣﻐﻧط وﺑﻧﺳب زﯾﺎدة ﺑﻠﻐت ‪ 17.7‬و‪ 34.6‬و ‪23.8‬‬
‫و‪ 28.4‬و‪ % 21.9‬ﻋﻠﻰ اﻟﺗواﻟﻲ ‪ .‬ﻛﻣﺎ اظﻬر ﺗداﺧل ﻣﻠوﺣﺔ ﻣﺎء اﻟري وﻣﻐﻧطﺗﻪ ان ﻣﻌﺎﻣﻠﺔ اﻟﺳﻘﻲ ﺑﺎﻟﻣﺎء اﻟﻌﺎدي‬
‫اﻟﻣﻣﻐﻧط ﻗد ﺣﻘق اﻋﻠﻰ ﻗﯾم ﻟﺻﻔﺗﻲ اﻟﻧﻣو وطول اﻟﻧﺑﺎت واﻟوزن اﻟﺟﺎف واﻟﻣﻣﺗص اﻟﻛﻠﻲ ﻣن ﻋﻧﺎﺻر اﻟﻧﺗروﺟﯾن‬
‫واﻟﻔﺳﻔور واﻟﺑوﺗﺎﺳﯾوم ﻣﻘﺎرﻧﺔ ﺑﺎﻟﻣﻌﺎﻣﻼت اﻻﺧرى وان اﻟﻔروق ﻛﺎﻧت ﻏﯾر ﻣﻌﻧوﯾﺔ ﺑﯾن ﻣﻌﺎﻣﻠﺗﻲ اﻟﺳﻘﻲ ﺑﺎﻟﻣﺎء اﻟﻌﺎدي‬
‫ﻏﯾر اﻟﻣﻣﻐﻧط واﻟﻣﺎء اﻟﻣﺎﻟﺢ اﻟﻣﻣﻐﻧط‪.‬‬

‫‪Effect of Magnetic Conditioning of Saline Water Characteristics‬‬

‫‪on corn plants growth (Zea mays L.) and up take of Nitrogen,‬‬
‫‪Phosphorus and Potassium‬‬

‫‪Bushra Mahmood‬‬
‫‪College of Agriculture/ University of Baghdad‬‬

‫‪Abstract‬‬
‫‪A biological Pots experiment was conducted in lath house of soil and water‬‬
‫‪sci.Dept. using silty clay loam Typic Torrifluvent soil collected form Agriculture‬‬
‫‪College fields. The soil was fertilized by 240 kg N.ha-1 as Urea fertilizer ,75 kg P.ha-1‬‬
‫‪as super phosphate and 120 kg K.ha-1 as Potassium sulphate fertilize. Corn seeds were‬‬
‫‪planted in spring 2007 irrigated by tap water with electrical conductivity of 0.4 dS.m-1‬‬

‫‪30‬‬
‫‪and drainage saline water 7.4 ds.m-1 with and without magnetic . 10 Weeks after‬‬
‫‪planting , plants were harvested, hights and dry weight of shoots were measured also‬‬
‫‪total uptake of N,P and K nutrients were measured .‬‬
‫‪The results of this experiment showed that Corn Plants hight ,dry weights‬‬
‫‪,total uptake of N,P and K nutrients were significantly decreased when drainage saline‬‬
‫‪water used as campared with tap water with decreament 10.8 ,28.9 ,17.7 ,22.7 ,17.8 %‬‬
‫‪of these characters respectively. On other hand magnetic water significantly increased‬‬
‫‪all studied characters as compared with non-magnetic. The increase were 17.7 ,34.6‬‬
‫‪,23.8 ,28.4 ,21.9 % for plant hight , dry matter weight ,total uptake of N ,P and K‬‬
‫‪nutrients respectively. The results also indicated that there was a significant‬‬
‫‪interaction between water quality and magnetic water , The highst values were‬‬
‫‪obtined with magnetic tap water treatment with no significant differences between‬‬
‫‪magnetic saline drainage water and non-magnetic tap water.‬‬

‫اﻟﻣﻘدﻣﺔ‬
‫ﺑرزت ﻓﻲ اﻻوﻧﺔ اﻻﺧﯾرة ﻣﻘﺎﻻت ﻋﻠﻣﯾﺔ وﺑﻌض اﻟدراﺳﺎت ﺣول ﺗﻘﻧﯾﺔ اﻟﺗﻛﯾﯾف اﻟﻣﻐﻧﺎطﯾﺳﻲ ودورﻫﺎ ﻓﻲ‬
‫اﻟﺗﻛﯾﯾف وﺗﺣﺳﯾن ﺧواص ﻣﯾﺎﻩ اﻟري واﻋﺎدة ﺗرﺗﯾب ﺟزﯾﺋﺎت اﻟﻣﺎء ذات اﻟﺗوزﯾﻊ اﻟﻌﺷواﺋﻲ وﺟﻌﻠﻬﺎ اﻛﺛر اﻧﺗظﺎﻣﺎ )‪(1‬‬
‫‪.‬وﻗد ذﻛر ﺗﻘرﯾر )‪ (2‬ان ﻣﻐﻧطﺔ ﻣﺎء اﻟري ﻗد ادت اﻟﻰ زﯾﺎدة ﻧﺳﺑﺔ اﻻوﻛﺳﺟﯾن اﻟﻣذاب ﻓﯾﻪ وﺗﻘﻠﯾل اﻟﺷد اﻟﺳطﺣﻲ‬
‫‪1-‬‬
‫وزﯾﺎدة اﻟﺿﻐط اﻻزﻣوزي وزﯾﺎدة ﻗﺎﺑﻠﯾﺗﻪ ﻓﻲ اذاﺑﺔ اﻟﻣواد اﻟﺻﻠﺑﺔ ﻟﻼﻣﻼح ﻣن‪ 20‬اﻟﻰ‬ ‫ﻣن ‪ 3‬اﻟﻰ ‪ 1‬ﻧﯾوﺗن ‪ .‬م‬
‫‪ %70‬واﻧﺧﻔﺎض اﻟﻠزوﺟﺔ ﺑﻧﺳﺑﺔ ‪ % 40 - 30‬وزﯾﺎدة ﺟﺎﻫزﯾﺔ اﻟﻌﻧﺎﺻر اﻟﻣﻐذﯾﺔ ﻓﻲ اﻟﺗرﺑﺔ وزﯾﺎدة ﺳرﻋﺔ ﺣرﻛﺔ‬
‫اﻟﻌﻧﺎﺻر ﻣن اﻟﺗرﺑﺔ اﻟﻰ اﻟﺟذور ﺛم اﻟﻰ اﻟﺟزء اﻟﺧﺿري واﻟﺛﻣﺎر وﺗﺣﺳﯾن ﻧﻔﺎذﯾﺔ ﻏﺷﺎء اﻟﺧﻠﯾﺔ)‪ . ( 3‬ﻫذا وﻗد‬
‫ﺣﺻل اﻟﻌدﯾد ﻣن اﻟﺑﺎﺣﺛﯾن ﻋﻠﻰ زﯾﺎدة ﻣﻌﻧوﯾﺔ ﻓﻲ ﺻﻔﺎت اﻟﻧﻣو وﺣﺎﺻل اﻟذرة اﻟﺻﻔراء ﺑﺎﺳﺗﻌﻣﺎل اﻟﻣﯾﺎﻩ اﻟﻣﻣﻐﻧطﺔ‬
‫ﻣﻘﺎرﻧﺔ ﺑﺎﻟﻣﯾﺎﻩ ﻏﯾر اﻟﻣﻣﻐﻧطﺔ )‪4‬و‪ 5‬و‪ 6‬و‪. (7‬‬
‫ان اﺳﺗﻌﻣﺎل اﻟﻣﯾﺎﻩ ردﯾﺋﺔ اﻟﺻﻼﺣﯾﺔ ﻛﺎﻟﻣﯾﺎﻩ اﻟﺟوﻓﯾﺔ اﻟﻣﺎﻟﺣﺔ وﻣﯾﺎﻩ اﻟﺑزل ﻗد ﯾﺿطر اﻟﯾﻬﺎ ﻟﺳد اﻟﻧﻘص‬
‫اﻟﺣﺎﺻل ﻓﻲ اﻟﻣﯾﺎﻩ اﻟﻌذﺑﺔ ﻏﯾر ان ﻫذﻩ اﻟﻧوﻋﯾﺔ ﻣن اﻟﻣﯾﺎﻩ ﺗﻛون ذات ﺗﺎﺛﯾر ﺳﻠﺑﻲ ﻓﻲ ﻧﻣو واﻧﺗﺎﺟﯾﺔ اﻟﻣﺣﺎﺻﯾل‬
‫ﻣﻘﺎرﻧﺔ ﺑﺎﻟﻣﯾﺎﻩ اﻟﻌذﺑﺔ )‪ . ( 9 ,8‬وﻣن ذﻟك ﺑرزت اﻧﻣﺎط واﺳﺎﻟﯾب ﺗﺣد ﻣن اﻟﺿرر اﻟﻧﺎﺟم ﻋن اﺳﺗﻌﻣﺎل ﻣﺛل ﻫذا‬
‫اﻟﻧوع ﻣن اﻟﻣﯾﺎﻩ ﻣﻧﻬﺎ اﻟﺗﻘﻧﯾﺔ اﻟﻣﻐﻧﺎطﯾﺳﯾﺔ ﻓﻘد ﺣﺻل ) ‪ ( 10‬ﻋﻠﻰ زﯾﺎدة ﻣﻌﻧوﯾﺔ ﻓﻲ ﻧﻣو اﻟﻧﺑﺎت وﺣﺎﺻل زﻫرة‬
‫اﻟﺷﻣس ﻋﻧد اﻟري ﺑﺎﻟﻣﯾﺎﻩ اﻟﻣﺎﻟﺣﺔ اﻟﻣﻣﻐﻧطﺔ ﻣﻘﺎرﻧﺔ ﺑﺎﻟﻣﯾﺎﻩ اﻟﻣﺎﻟﺣﺔ ﻏﯾر اﻟﻣﻣﻐﻧطﺔ وﻗد ﺑﻠﻎ اﻻﺧﺗزال ﻓﻲ اﻟﺣﺎﺻل‬
‫‪% 32.8‬ﻋﻧد اﺳﺗﻌﻣﺎل اﻟﻣﯾﺎﻩ اﻟﻣﺎﻟﺣﺔ اﻟﻣﻣﻐﻧطﺔ و‪ % 56.1‬ﻋﻧد اﺳﺗﻌﻣﺎل اﻟﻣﯾﺎﻩ اﻟﻣﺎﻟﺣﺔ ﻏﯾر اﻟﻣﻣﻐﻧطﺔ ﻣﻘﺎرﻧﺔ ﻣﻊ‬
‫ﻣﯾﺎﻩ اﻟري اﻟﻌذﺑﺔ ‪ .‬ﻛﻣﺎ ﺣﺻل ) ‪ ( 5‬ﻋﻠﻰ ﻧﺗﺎﺋﺞ ﻣﺷﺎﺑﻬﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺣﺻول اﻟذرة اﻟﺻﻔراء ‪ .‬وﺑﻬدف دراﺳﺔ ﺗﺎﺛﯾر‬
‫ﻣﻐﻧطﺔ ﻣﯾﺎﻩ اﻟري اﻟﻌذﺑﺔ واﻟﻣﺎﻟﺣﺔ ﻓﻲ ﻧﻣو ﻣﺣﺻول اﻟذرة اﻟﺻﻔراء واﻟﻣﻣﺗص اﻟﻛﻠﻲ ﻣن ﻋﻧﺎﺻر اﻟﻧﺗروﺟﯾن‬
‫واﻟﻔﺳﻔور واﻟﺑوﺗﺎﺳﯾوم ﻣن ﻗﺑل اﻟﻧﺑﺎت اﻗﯾﻣت ﻫذﻩ اﻟدراﺳﺔ ‪.‬‬

‫‪31‬‬
 ‫اﻟﻣواد وطراﺋق اﻟﻌﻣل‬
‫اﺟرﯾت ﺗﺟرﺑﺔ ﺑﺎﯾوﻟوﺟﯾﺔ ﻓﻲ اﺻص ﺑﻼﺳﺗﯾﻛﯾﺔ ﻓﻲ اﻟظﻠﺔ اﻟﺳﻠﻛﯾﺔ اﻟﺗﺎﺑﻌﺔ ﻟﻘﺳم ﻋﻠوم اﻟﺗرﺑﺔ واﻟﻣﯾﺎﻩ ﻓﻲ‬
‫ﻛﻠﯾﺔ اﻟزراﻋﺔ – ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺑﻐداد ﺑﺎﺳﺗﻌﻣﺎل ﺗرﺑﺔ ﻣزﯾﺟﺔ طﯾﻧﯾﺔ ﻏرﯾﻧﯾﺔ ‪ SicL‬ﻣﺻﻧﻔﺔ ﺿﻣن ﻣﺟﺎﻣﯾﻊ اﻟﺗرب اﻟﻌظﻣﻰ‬
‫‪ Typic Torrifluvent‬ﺣﺳب ﻧظﺎم ﺗﺻﻧﯾف اﻟﺗرب اﻟﻌﺎﻟﻣﻲ)‪ . ( 11‬اﺧذت ﻣﺎدة اﻟﺗرﺑﺔ ﻣن ﺣﻘول ﻛﻠﯾﺔ اﻟزراﻋﺔ‬
‫‪ 30 - 0‬ﺳم ﺟﻔﻔت ﻫواﺋﯾﺎ وطﺣﻧت وﻣررت ﻣن ﻣﻧﺧل ‪ 4‬ﻣﻠم ووﺿﻌت ﻓﻲ اﺻص‬ ‫ﻧﻔﺳﻬﺎ وﻣن اﻟطﺑﻘﺔ اﻟﺳطﺣﯾﺔ‬
‫ﺑﻼﺳﺗﯾﻛﯾﺔ ﺑواﻗﻊ ‪ 10‬ﻛﻐم ﺗرﺑﺔ ﻓﻲ ﻛل اﺻﯾص وﯾوﺿﺢ ﺟدول )‪ (1‬ﺑﻌض اﻟﺻﻔﺎت اﻟﻛﯾﻣﯾﺎﺋﯾﺔ واﻟﻔﯾزﯾﺎﺋﯾﺔ ﻟﺗرﺑﺔ‬
‫اﻟدراﺳﺔ ‪.‬‬
‫‪1-‬‬
‫ﺑﺎﺳﺗﻌﻣﺎل ﺳﻣﺎد‬ ‫ﻋوﻣﻠت اﻟﺗرب ﻓﻲ اﻻﺻص ﺑﺎﻟﻣﻌﺎﻣﻼت اﻟﺳﻣﺎدﯾﺔ اﻟﺗﺎﻟﯾﺔ ‪ 240:‬ﻛﻐم ‪ . N‬ﻫﻛﺗﺎر‬
‫اﻟﯾورﯾﺎ ) ‪ ( N% 46‬اﺿﯾف ﻋﻠﻰ دﻓﻌﺗﯾن اﻻوﻟﻰ ﻋﻧد اﻟزراﻋﺔ واﻻﺧرى ﺑﻌد ﺷﻬر ﻣن اﻟزراﻋﺔ ‪ .‬ﻛﻣﺎ اﺿﯾف‬
‫‪1-‬‬
‫ﺑﺎﺳﺗﻌﻣﺎل ﺳﻣﺎد ﺳوﺑر ﻓوﺳﻔﺎت اﻟﺛﻼﺛﻲ ) ‪ ( P% 21‬دﻓﻌﺔ واﺣدة‬ ‫اﻟﺳﻣﺎد اﻟﻔوﺳﻔﺎﺗﻲ ﺑﻣﻌدل ‪ 75‬ﻛﻐم ‪ . p‬ﻫﻛﺗﺎر‬
‫‪1-‬‬
‫ﺑﺎﺳﺗﻌﻣﺎل ﺳﻣﺎد ﻛﺑرﯾﺗﺎت اﻟﺑوﺗﺎﺳﯾوم )‪41.5‬‬ ‫ﻋﻧد اﻟزراﻋﺔ واﺿﯾف اﻟﺳﻣﺎد اﻟﺑوﺗﺎﺳﻲ ﺑﻣﻌدل ‪ 120‬ﻛﻐم ‪. K‬ﻫﻛﺗﺎر‬
‫‪ (%‬ﻋﻠﻰ دﻓﻌﺗﯾن ﻣراﻓﻘﺔ ﻣﻊ اﻟﺳﻣﺎد اﻟﻧﺗروﺟﯾﻧﻲ ‪.‬‬
‫زرﻋت اﻻﺻص ﺑﺑذور اﻟذرة اﻟﺻﻔراء )ﺻﻧف ﺑﺣوث ‪ ( 106‬ﻓﻲ اﻟﻌروة اﻟرﺑﯾﻌﯾﺔ ﻟﻌﺎم ‪ 2007‬ﺑواﻗﻊ ‪10‬‬
‫ﺑذور ﻓﻲ ﻛل اﺻﯾص ﺧﻔت ﺑﻌد اﻻﻧﺑﺎت اﻟﻰ ﺛﻼﺛﺔ ﻧﺑﺎﺗﺎت ﻓﻲ اﻻﺻﯾص اﻟواﺣد ‪ .‬ﺗم اﻟﺳﻘﻲ ﺑﺎﻟﻣﺎء اﻟﻌﺎدي )ﻣﺎء‬
‫‪1-‬‬
‫وﺑﺎﻟﻣﺎء اﻟﻣﺎﻟﺢ ) ﻣن ﻣﺑﺎزل اﻟﻛﻠﯾﺔ ( ذات اﻻﯾﺻﺎﻟﯾﺔ‬ ‫اﻟﺣﻧﻔﯾﺔ ( ذات اﻻﯾﺻﺎﻟﯾﺔ اﻟﻛﻬرﺑﺎﺋﯾﺔ ‪ 0.4‬دﯾﺳﯾﺳﯾﻣﻧز‪ .‬م‬
‫‪1-‬‬
‫اﻟﻣﻣﻐﻧط ﺗﺎرة ) ﺑﺎﺳﺗﻌﻣﺎل ﺟﻬﺎز ‪ Magnetotron‬ﻧوع ‪ UT‬ﺑﻘطر ‪ 2‬اﻧﺞ‬ ‫اﻟﻛﻬرﺑﺎﺋﯾﺔ ‪ 7.4‬دﯾﺳﯾﺳﯾﻣﻧز ‪ .‬م‬
‫وﺑﺷدة ﺗدﻓق ﻣﻐﻧﺎطﯾﺳﻲ ﻗدرﻫﺎ ‪ 1000‬ﻛﺎوس واﻟﻣﺻﻧﻊ ﻣﺣﻠﯾﺎ( وﺑﺎﻟﻣﺎء ﻏﯾر اﻟﻣﻣﻐﻧط ﺗﺎرة اﺧرى ﻟﻠﻧوﻋﯾن ﻣن اﻟﻣﺎء‬
‫ﻻﯾﺻﺎل اﻟرطوﺑﺔ ﻓﻲ اﻟﺗرﺑﺔ اﻟﻰ اﻟﺳﻌﺔ اﻟﺣﻘﻠﯾﺔ وﯾﻌﺎد اﻟﺳﻘﻲ ﻋﻧدﻣﺎ ﺗﻔﻘد اﻟﺗرﺑﺔ ‪ % 50‬ﻣن اﻟﻣﺎء اﻟﺟﺎﻫز وزﻧﯾﺎ‪.‬‬
‫ﺗم ﻋﻣل ﺛﻼﺛﺔ ﻣﻛررات ﻟﻛل ﻣﻌﺎﻣﻠﺔ ﻟﺗﺻﺑﺢ ﻋدد اﻟﻣﻌﺎﻣﻼت ‪ 12= 3*2*2‬وﺣدة ﺗﺟرﯾﺑﯾﺔ وزﻋت ﻋﺷواﺋﯾﺎ‬
‫ﺑﺗﺻﻣﯾم ﺗﺎم اﻟﺗﻌﺷﯾﺔ )‪ ( CRD‬وﻓﻲ ﻧﻬﺎﯾﺔ اﻟﺗﺟرﺑﺔ )ﺑﻌد ‪ 10‬اﺳﺎﺑﯾﻊ ﻣن اﻟزراﻋﺔ ( ﺗم ﻗطﻊ اﻟﻧﺑﺎﺗﺎت ﻣن ﺳطﺢ‬
‫اﻟﺗرﺑﺔ ﻓﻲ اﻻﺻص ﺑﻌد اﺧذ اطواﻟﻬﺎ ﺛم ﺟﻔﻔت ﻓﻲ اﻟﻔرن ﻋﻠﻰ درﺟﺔ ﺣ اررة ‪ °65‬م ﻟﺣﯾن ﺛﺑﺎت اﻟوزن وﺗم ﺣﺳﺎب‬
‫وزﻧﻬﺎ اﻟﺟﺎف ‪ .‬ﺑﻌد طﺣن اﻟﻧﺑﺎﺗﺎت ﻓﻲ ﻛل ﻣﻌﺎﻣﻠﺔ اﺧذ ‪ o.2‬ﻏم ﻣن اﻟﻣﺎدة اﻟﺟﺎﻓﺔ ﻫﺿﻣت ﺑﺎﺳﺗﻌﻣﺎل ﺣﺎﻣض‬
‫اﻟﻛﺑرﯾﺗﯾك واﻟﺑﯾروﻛﻠورﯾك ﺣﺳب اﻟطرﯾﻘﺔ اﻟواردة ﻓﻲ)‪ ( 16‬وﺗم ﺗﻘدﯾر ﻛل ﻣن اﻟﻧﺗروﺟﯾن واﻟﻔﺳﻔور واﻟﺑوﺗﺎﺳﯾوم ﺣﺳب‬
‫اﻟطرﯾﻘﺔ اﻟواردة ﻓﻲ)‪ ( 13‬وﺣﺳﺎب اﻟﻣﻣﺗص اﻟﻛﻠﻲ ﻣن ﻫذﻩ اﻟﻌﻧﺎﺻر ﺑﺿرب اﻟﺗرﻛﯾز ﻓﻲ اﻟوزن اﻟﺟﺎف اﻟﻛﻠﻲ ‪.‬‬

‫ﺟدول )‪ (1‬ﺑﻌض اﻟﺻﻔﺎت اﻟﻛﯾﻣﯾﺎﺋﯾﺔ واﻟﻔﯾزﯾﺎﺋﯾﺔ ﻟﺗرب اﻟدراﺳﺔ ‪.‬‬

‫طرﯾﻘﺔ اﻟﺗﺣﻠﯾل اﻟﻣﺳﺗﻌﻣﻠﺔ‬ ‫اﻟوﺣدات‬ ‫اﻟﻘﯾﻣﺔ‬ ‫اﻟﺻﻔﺔ‬

‫‪32‬‬
 ‫ﺟﻬﺎز ‪ PH-meter‬ﺣﺳب ﻣﺎ ورد ﻓﻲ )‪(12‬‬ ‫ــ‬ ‫‪7.9‬‬ ‫‪PH‬‬

‫ﺟﻬﺎز اﻟﺗوﺻﯾل اﻟﻛﻬرﺑﺎﺋﻲ ﺣﺳب ﻣﺎورد‬

‫‪ds.m-1‬‬ ‫‪4.5‬‬ ‫‪ECe‬‬
‫ﻓﻲ)‪(12‬‬

‫ﺣﺳب ﻣﺎ ورد ﻓﻲ)‪( 12‬‬ ‫‪Cmolc.Kg-1‬‬ ‫‪24.9‬‬ ‫‪CEC‬‬

‫ﺣﺳب ﻣﺎ ورد ﻓﻲ)‪( 12‬‬ ‫‪gm.Kg soil‬‬ ‫‪-1‬‬
‫‪260‬‬ ‫ﻣﻌﺎدن اﻟﻛﺎرﺑوﻧﺎت‬
‫اﻻﺳﺗﺧﻼص ﺑﻣﺣﻠول )‪ KCL(2N‬واﻟﺗﻘدﯾر‬
‫‪45.7‬‬ ‫اﻟﻧﺗروﺟﯾن اﻟﺟﺎﻫز‬
‫ﺑﺟﻬﺎز ﻣﺎﯾﻛروﻛﻠدال ﺣﺳب ﻣﺎ ورد ﻓﻲ )‪(13‬‬
‫اﻻﺳﺗﺧﻼص ﺑﻣﺣﻠول )‪NaHCO3(0.5M‬‬
‫ﻋﻧد ‪ 8.5 PH‬واﻟﺗﻘدﯾر ﺑﺟﻬﺎز اﻟطﯾف‬ ‫‪10.9‬‬ ‫اﻟﻔﺳﻔور اﻟﺟﺎﻫز‬
‫‪mg.Kg-1 soil‬‬
‫اﻟﻠوﻧﻲ ﺣﺳب ﻣﺎ ورد )‪( 13‬‬
‫اﻻﺳﺗﺧﻼص ﺑﻣﺣﻠول )‪ (1M‬ﻛﻠورﯾد‬
‫اﻟﺑوﺗﺎﺳﯾوم واﻟﺗﻘدﯾر ﺑﺟﻬﺎز اﻟﻠﻬب ﺣﺳب ﻣﺎ‬ ‫‪204.8‬‬ ‫اﻟﺑوﺗﺎﺳﯾوم اﻟﺟﺎﻫز‬
‫ورد ﻓﻲ )‪(14‬‬
‫‪120‬‬ ‫اﻟرﻣل‬
‫اﻟﺗﻘدﯾر ﺑطرﯾﻘﺔ اﻟﻣﺎﺻﺔ اﻟﺣﺟﻣﯾﺔ اﻟواردة ﻓﻲ‬ ‫‪520‬‬ ‫اﻟﻐرﯾن‬

‫اﻟﻧﺳﺟﺔ‬
‫‪gm.Kg-1 soil‬‬
‫)‪. (15‬‬ ‫‪360‬‬ ‫اﻟطﯾن‬
‫ﻣزﯾﺟﺔ طﯾﻧﯾﺔ ﻏرﯾﻧﯾﺔ‬
‫‪Zero‬‬
‫‪550‬‬

‫اﻟﻣﺣﺗوى اﻟرطوﺑﻲ‬
‫‪Kpa‬‬
‫‪33‬‬
‫ﺣﺳب اﻟطرق اﻟوادة ﻓﻲ)‪(12‬‬ ‫‪gm.Water.Kg-1 soil‬‬ ‫‪335‬‬
‫‪Kap‬‬
‫‪1500‬‬
‫‪179‬‬
‫‪Kpa‬‬

‫اﻟﻧﺗﺎﺋﺞ واﻟﻣﻧﺎﻗﺷﺔ‬
‫ﯾظﻬر ﻣن اﻟﺷﻛﻠﯾن )‪ 1‬و‪ (2‬ان ﻟﻣﻠوﺣﺔ ﻣﺎء اﻟري ﺗﺎﺛﯾر ﺳﻠﺑﻲ ﻣﻌﻧوي ﻓﻲ ﺧﻔض ﻣﻌدل اطوال اﻟﻧﺑﺎﺗﺎت‬
‫واﻟوزن اﻟﺟﺎف ﻟﻠﺟزء اﻟﺧﺿري وﺑﻧﺳﺑﺔ ﻧﻘﺻﺎن ﺑﻠﻐت ‪ % 10.8‬و‪ % 28.9‬ﻣن اﺳﺗﻌﻣﺎل اﻟﻣﺎء اﻟﻣﺎﻟﺢ ﻣﻘﺎرﻧﺔ ﺑﺎﻟﻣﺎء‬

‫‪33‬‬
‫اﻟﻌﺎدي ﻟﻠﺻﻔﺗﯾن اﻟﻣذﻛورﺗﯾن ﻋﻠﻰ اﻟﺗواﻟﻲ وﻗد ﯾرﺟﻊ اﻟﺳﺑب اﻟﻰ ان ﻣﺣﺻول اﻟذرة اﻟﺻﻔراء ﻣن اﻟﻣﺣﺎﺻﯾل‬
‫اﻟﻣﺗوﺳطﺔ اﻟﺣﺳﺎﺳﯾﺔ ﻟﻠﻣﻠوﺣﺔ)‪ (17‬ﻓﺿﻼ ﻋن ﺗﺎﺛﯾر اﻻﻣﻼح ﻓﻲ ﺧﻔض ﺟﺎﻫزﯾﺔ اﻟﻣﺎء ﻟﻠﻧﺑﺎت ﻧﺗﯾﺟﺔ ارﺗﻔﺎع‬
‫اﻟﺿﻐط اﻻزﻣوزي ﻟوﺳط اﻟﻧﻣو وﻋدم ﻣﻘدرة اﻟﻧﺑﺎت ﻋﻠﻰ اﻣﺗﺻﺎص اﻟﻣﺎء واﻟﺗﺎﺛﯾرات اﻟﻣﺑﺎﺷرة وﻏﯾر اﻟﻣﺑﺎﺷرة ﻓﻲ‬
‫ﺧﺻﺎﺋص اﻟﺗرﺑﺔ اﻟﻔﯾزﯾﺎﺋﯾﺔ واﻟﻛﯾﻣﯾﺎﺋﯾﺔ اﻟﺗﻲ ﺗﻌﻛس ﺳﻠﺑﺎ ﻓﻲ ﺗطور وﻧﻣو اﻟﻧﺑﺎت)‪ . (18‬وﻗد ﺣﺻل اﻟﻣوﺳوي )‪(9‬‬
‫و)‪ (19‬ﻋﻠﻰ ﻧﺗﺎﺋﺞ ﻣﺷﺎﺑﻬﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺣﺻول اﻟذرة اﻟﺻﻔراء ‪.‬‬
‫اﻣﺎ ﺗﺎﺛﯾر ﻣﻐﻧطﺔ ﻣﺎء اﻟري ﻓﻘد اظﻬرت اﻟﻧﺗﺎﺋﺞ زﯾﺎدة ﻣﻌﻧوﯾﺔ ﻓﻲ اطوال اﻟﻧﺑﺎﺗﺎت واﻟوزن اﻟﺟﺎف ﻟﻠﺟزء‬
‫اﻟﺧﺿري ﻟﻠﻧﺑﺎﺗﺎت اﻟﻣروﯾﺔ ﺑﺎﻟﻣﯾﺎﻩ اﻟﻣﻣﻐﻧطﺔ ﻣﻘﺎرﻧﺔ ﺑﺎﻟﻣﺎء اﻟﻌﺎدي وﺑﻧﺳﺑﺔ زﯾﺎدة ‪ % 17.7‬و ‪ % 34.6‬ﻟﻠﺻﻔﺗﯾن‬
‫ﻋﻠﻰ اﻟﺗواﻟﻲ وﻗد ﯾﻌزى اﻟﺳﺑب اﻟﻰ ان اﻟري ﺑﺎﻟﻣﯾﺎﻩ اﻟﻣﻣﻐﻧطﺔ ﯾزﯾد ﻣن ﻧﻣو اﻟﻧﺑﺎت ﻓﻘد اﺷﺎر )‪ (1‬ان ﺗﺣطﯾم‬
‫اﻻواﺻر اﻟﻬﯾدروﺟﯾﻧﯾﺔ ﺟراء ﻣﻐﻧطﺔ ﻣﺎء اﻟري ﯾﺳﻬل ﻋﻣﻠﯾﺔ اﻣﺗﺻﺎص اﻟﻣﺎء ﻣن ﻗﺑل ﺧﻼﯾﺎ اﻟﺟذور ﻛﻣﺎ ﯾﺻﺑﺢ‬
‫اﻟﻣﺎء ﻧﺎﻗﻼ ﺟﯾدا ﻟﻠﻌﻧﺎﺻر اﻟﻣﻐذﯾﺔ وﯾزﯾد ﻣن ﺟﺎﻫزﯾﺗﻬﺎ ﻓﻲ اﻟﺗرب‪ .‬وﻗد ﺣﺻل )‪ (7‬و )‪(5‬ﻋﻠﻰ ﻧﺗﺎﺋﺞ ﻣﺷﺎﺑﻬﺔ‬
‫ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺣﺻول اﻟذرة اﻟﺻﻔراء‪.‬‬
‫اظﻬر ﺗداﺧل ﻋﺎﻣﻠﻲ اﻟﻣﻠوﺣﺔ واﻟﻣﻐﻧطﺔ ﺗﻔوق ﻣﻌﺎﻣﻠﺔ اﻟﻣﺎء اﻟﻌﺎدي اﻟﻣﻣﻐﻧط ﻋﻠﻰ ﺑﺎﻗﻲ اﻟﻣﻌﺎﻣﻼت وﻟم‬
‫ﯾﻛن اﻟﻔرق ﻣﻌﻧوي ﺑﯾن ﻣﻌﺎﻣﻠﺗﻲ اﻟﻣﺎء اﻟﻌﺎدي ﻏﯾر اﻟﻣﻣﻐﻧط واﻟﻣﺎء اﻟﻣﺎﻟﺢ اﻟﻣﻣﻐﻧط ﻟﻛﻼ ﺻﻔﺗﻲ اطوال واوزان‬
‫اﻟﻧﺑﺎت اﻟﺟﺎﻓﺔ ‪.‬‬
‫اظﻬرت اﻻﺷﻛﺎل )‪ 3‬و‪ 4‬و‪ ( 5‬ان ﻋﺎﻣل ﻣﻠوﺣﺔ ﻣﺎء اﻟري ﻗد ادت اﻟﻰ اﻧﺧﻔﺎض اﻟﻣﻣﺗص ﻣن ﻋﻧﺎﺻر‬
‫اﻟﻧﺗروﺟﯾن واﻟﻔﺳﻔور واﻟﺑوﺗﺎﺳﯾوم ﻣﻘﺎرﻧﺔ ﺑﻣﺎء اﻟﺳﻘﻰ ‪.‬‬

‫‪LSD.05‬‬
‫ﻧوع اﻟﻣﯾﺎه = ‪3.26‬‬
‫ﻣﻐطﺗﮭﺎ= ‪3.26‬‬
‫‪100‬‬ ‫‪94.2‬‬ ‫اﻟﺗداﺧل= ‪4.61‬‬
‫‪90‬‬ ‫‪85‬‬ ‫‪86.93‬‬

‫‪80‬‬
‫‪72.9‬‬
‫‪70‬‬

‫‪60‬‬ ‫ﻣﺎء ﻋﺎدي‬

‫اطوال اﻟﻧﺑﺎت )ﺳم(‬

‫ﻣﺎء ﻣ ﺎﻟﺞ‬
‫‪50‬‬

‫‪40‬‬

‫‪30‬‬

‫‪20‬‬

‫‪10‬‬

‫‪0‬‬
‫‪1‬‬
‫ﻣﻣﻐﻧط‬ ‫ﻣﻣﻐﻧط‬
‫ﻏﯾر ‪2‬‬

‫ﺷﻛل )‪ (1‬ﺗﺄﺛﯾر ﻣﻠوﺣﺔ ﻣﺎء اﻟري وﻣﻐﻧطﺗﻪ ﻓﻲ طول اﻟﻧﺑﺎت )ﺳم(‬

‫‪LSD.05‬‬
‫ﻧوع اﻟﻣﯾﺎه = ‪0.937‬‬
‫ﻣﻐﻧطﺗﮭﺎ= ‪0.937‬‬
‫‪10‬‬ ‫اﻟﺗداﺧل= ‪1.32‬‬

‫‪9‬‬ ‫‪8.58‬‬
‫‪34‬‬
‫‪8‬‬
‫‪6.84‬‬
‫‪7‬‬ ‫‪6.56‬‬
‫اﻟ وزن ا‬

‫‪6‬‬
 ‫ﺷﻛل )‪ (2‬ﺗﺄﺛﯾر ﻣﻠوﺣﺔ ﻣﺎء اﻟري وﻣﻐﻧطﺗﻪ ﻓﻲ اﻟوزن ﻟﺟﺎف ) ﻏم ﻧﺑﺎت‪(1-‬‬

‫‪LSD.05‬‬
‫ﻧوع اﻟﻣﯾﺎه = ‪8.25‬‬
‫ﻣﻐﻧطﺗﮭﺎ= ‪8.25‬‬
‫‪250‬‬ ‫‪237.33‬‬ ‫اﻟﺗداﺧل= ‪11.67‬‬

‫‪196.33‬‬ ‫‪200.56‬‬
‫‪200‬‬
‫ﻛﻣﯾﺔ اﻟﻧﯾﺗروﺟﯾن اﻟﻣﻣﺗص )ﻣﻠﻐم‪.‬ﻧﺑﺎت‪(1-‬‬

‫‪156.33‬‬
‫‪150‬‬
‫ﻣﺎء ﻋﺎدي‬
‫ﻣﺎء ﻣ ﺎﻟﺞ‬
‫‪100‬‬

‫‪50‬‬

‫‪0‬‬
‫‪1‬‬
‫ﻣﻣﻐﻧط‬ ‫ﻣﻣﻐﻧط‬
‫ﻏﯾر ‪2‬‬

‫ﺷﻛل )‪ (3‬ﺗﺄﺛﯾر ﻣﻠوﺣﺔ ﻣﺎء اﻟري وﻣﻐﻧطﺗﻪ ﻓﻲ ﻛﻣﯾﺔ اﻟﻧﯾﺗروﺟﯾن اﻟﻣﻣﺗص )ﻣﻠﻐم‪.‬ﻧﺑﺎت‪(1-‬‬
‫‪LSD.05‬‬
‫ﻧوع اﻟﻣﯾﺎه = ‪1.66‬‬
‫ﻣﻐﻧطﺗﮭﺎ= ‪1.66‬‬
‫‪30‬‬ ‫اﻟﺗداﺧل= ‪2.35‬‬

‫‪26‬‬
‫‪25‬‬
‫‪35‬‬
‫‪21.53‬‬ ‫‪21.36‬‬
‫ﻛﻣﯾﺔ اﻟﻔﺳﻔور اﻟﻣ‬

‫‪20‬‬

‫‪15.33‬‬
 ‫ﺷﻛل )‪ (4‬ﺗﺄﺛﯾر ﻣﻠوﺣﺔ ﻣﺎء اﻟري وﻣﻐﻧطﺗﻪ ﻓﻲ ﻛﻣﯾﺔ اﻟﻔﺳﻔور اﻟﻣﻣﺗص )ﻣﻠﻐم‪.‬ﻧﺑﺎت‪(1-‬‬

‫‪LSD.05‬‬
‫ﻧوع اﻟﻣﯾﺎه = ‪4.34‬‬
‫ﻣﻐﻧطﺗﮭﺎ= ‪4.34‬‬
‫‪250‬‬ ‫اﻟﺗداﺧل= ‪6.14‬‬

‫‪216.23‬‬

‫‪200‬‬ ‫‪192.16‬‬ ‫‪192.63‬‬

‫ﻛﻣﯾ ﺔ اﻟﺑوﺗﺎﺳ ﯾوم اﻟﻣﻣﺗ ص )ﻣﻠﻐ م‪ .‬ﻧﺑ ﺎت‪(1-‬‬

‫‪150‬‬ ‫‪143.03‬‬

‫ﻣﺎء ﻋﺎدي‬
‫ﻣﺎء ﻣ ﺎﻟﺞ‬
‫‪100‬‬

‫‪50‬‬

‫‪0‬‬
‫‪1‬‬
‫ﻣﻣﻐﻧط‬ ‫ﻣﻣﻐﻧط‬
‫ﻏﯾر ‪2‬‬

‫ﺷﻛل )‪ (5‬ﺗﺄﺛﯾر ﻣﻠوﺣﺔ ﻣﺎء اﻟري وﻣﻐﻧطﺗﻪ ﻓﻲ ﻛﻣﯾﺔ اﻟﺑوﺗﺎﺳﯾوم اﻟﻣﻣﺗص )ﻣﻠﻐم‪.‬ﻧﺑﺎت‪(1-‬‬
‫اﻟﻌﺎدي وﺑﻧﺳﺑﺔ اﻧﺧﻔﺎض ‪ % 17.7‬و‪ % 22.7‬و‪ % 17.8‬ﻟﻠﻌﻧﺎﺻر اﻟﻣذﻛورﻩ ﻋﻠﻰ اﻟﺗواﻟﻲ ان ﺳﺑب‬
‫اﻻﻧﺧﻔﺎض ﻗد ﯾرﺟﻊ اﻟﻰ ﺿﻌف ﻧﻣو اﻟﺟذور اﻟﻧﺎﺟم ﻋن ﺗﺎﺛﯾرات اﻟﻣﻠوﺣﺔ وﺑﺎﻟﺗﺎﻟﻲ ﻗﻠﺔ ﻗﺎﺑﻠﯾﺗﻬﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ اﻣﺗﺻﺎص‬
‫اﻟﻌﻧﺎﺻر اﻟﻣﻐذﯾﺔ اﻟﻣﺧﺗﻠﻔﺔ ﻓﺿﻼ ﻋن اﺧﺗﻼل اﻟﺗوازن اﻟﻐذاﺋﻲ ﻓﻲ اﻟﺗرﺑﺔ وﻗد ﺣﺻل)‪ ( 5‬ﻋﻠﻰ ﻧﺗﺎﺋﺞ ﻣﺷﺎﺑﻬﺔ ‪.‬‬

‫‪36‬‬

‫ﺷﻛل )‪ (1‬ﺗﺄﺛﯾر ﻣﻠوﺣﺔ ﻣﺎء اﻟري وﻣﻐﻧطﺗﮫ ﻓﻲ اطوال اﻟﻧﺑﺎت )ﺳم(‬

‫اﻣﺎ ﺗﺎﺛﯾرﻋﺎﻣل ﻣﻐﻧطﺔ ﻣﺎء اﻟري ﻓﻘد زادت ﻣﻌﻧوﯾﺎ اﻟﻣﻣﺗص ﻣن ﻋﻧﺎﺻر اﻟﻧﺗروﺟﯾن واﻟﻔﺳﻔور واﻟﺑوﺗﺎﺳﯾوم‬
‫وﺑﻧﺳﺑﺔ زﯾﺎدة ﺑﻠﻐت ‪ % 23.8‬و‪ % 28.4‬و ‪ % 21.9‬ﻟﻠﻌﻧﺎﺻر اﻟﻣذﻛورةﻋﻠﻰ اﻟﺗواﻟﻲ ‪ .‬وﻗد ﯾرﺟﻊ اﻟﺳﺑب اﻟﻰ دور‬
‫اﻟﻣﺎء اﻟﻣﻣﻐﻧط ﻓﻲ زﯾﺎدة ذوﺑﺎﻧﯾﺔ اﻟﻣواد اﻟﺻﻠﺑﺔ وزﯾﺎدة ﺟﺎﻫزﯾﺔ اﻟﻌﻧﺎﺻر اﻟﻣﻐذﯾﺔ ﻓﻲ اﻟﺗرﺑﺔوزﯾﺎدة ﺳرﻋﺔ ﺣرﻛﺔ‬
‫اﻟﻌﻧﺎﺻر اﻟﻣﻐذﯾﺔ ﻓﻲ اﻟﺗرﺑﺔ اﻟﻰ اﻟﺟذور ﺛم اﻟﺟزء اﻟﺧﺿري )‪ (2‬وﻗد ﺣﺻل )‪ (5‬ﻋﻠﻰ ﻧﺗﺎﺋﺞ ﻣﻣﺎﺛﻠﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺣﺻول‬
‫اﻟذرة اﻟﺻﻔراء ‪.‬‬
‫ﻛﻣﺎ اظﻬر اﻟﺗداﺧل اﻟﺛﻧﺎﺋﻲ ﻟﻌﺎﻣﻠﻲ اﻟﻣﻠوﺣﺔ واﻟﻣﻐﻧطﺔ زﯾﺎدة ﻣﻌﻧوﯾﺔ ﻓﻲ اﻣﺗﺻﺎص اﻟﻌﻧﺎﺻر اﻟﻣذﻛورة ﻓﻲ‬
‫ﻣﻌﺎﻣﻠﺔ اﻟﻣﺎء اﻟﻌﺎدي اﻟﻣﻣﻐﻧط ﻣﻘﺎرﻧﺔ ﺑﻣﻌﺎﻣﻼت اﻟﺗﺟرﺑﺔ اﻻﺧرى وﻟم ﯾﻛن اﻟﻔرق ﻣﻌﻧوﯾﺎ ﺑﯾن ﻣﻌﺎﻣﻠﺗﻲ اﻟﻣﺎء اﻟﻣﺎﻟﺢ‬
‫اﻟﻣﻣﻐﻧط واﻟﻣﺎء اﻟﻌﺎدي ﻏﯾر اﻟﻣﻣﻐﻧط ﻓﻲ اﻟﻣﻣﺗص ﻣن ﻫذﻩ اﻟﻌﻧﺎﺻر ﻣﻣﺎ ﻗد ﯾدل ﻋﻠﻰ اﻣﻛﺎﻧﯾﺔ اﻟﺗﻐﻠب ﻋﻠﻰ‬
‫اﻟﺿرر اﻟﻧﺎﺟم ﻋن ﻣﻠوﺣﺔ ﻣﺎء اﻟري ﻣن ﺧﻼل اﻟﺗﻛﯾﯾف اﻟﻣﻐﻧﺎطﯾﺳﻲ ‪.‬‬

‫اﻟﻣﺻﺎدر‬
‫‪1. Kronenberg , K. 2005 . Magneto hydrodynamics The effect of magents on fluids‬‬
‫‪GMX international . E-mail :corporate @gmxinterhatinal . Com. Fax: 909-‬‬
‫‪627-4411.‬‬
‫‪2. Fluid Energy Australia Pty ,Ltd. 2000. Performance Report on the application of‬‬
‫‪the TVS-SERIS VORTEX water energizer for leaf vegetable root vegetable‬‬
‫‪and fruiting plants. E-mail: Lanco @ bigpond . Com.‬‬
‫‪3. Aladjadjiyan , A. 2002. Study of the influence of magnetic field on some biological‬‬
‫)‪characteristics of Zea mays ,J . Center European Agriculture ,Volume 3 (2‬‬
‫‪: 90 -94 .‬‬
‫‪ .4‬ﻓﻬد ‪ ،‬ﻋﻠﻲ ﻋﺑد وﻗﺗﯾﺑﺔ ﻣﺣﻣد و ﻋدﻧﺎن ﺷﺑﺎر ﻓﺎﻟﺢ وطﺎرق ﻟﻔﺗﻪ رﺷﯾد ‪ . 2005 .‬اﻟﺗﻛﯾف اﻟﻣﻐﻧﺎطﯾﺳﻲ ﻟﺧواص‬
‫اﻟﯾﺎﻩ اﻟﻣﺎﻟﺣﺔ ﻻﻏراض ري اﻟﻣﺣﺎﺻﯾل ‪ -2‬اﻟذرﻩ اﻟﺻﻔراء واﻟﺣﻧطﺔ ‪ .‬ﻣﺟﻠﺔ اﻟﻌﻠوم اﻟزراﻋﯾﺔ اﻟﻌراﻗﯾﺔ ‪.‬‬
‫‪. 34 -29 : (1) 36‬‬
‫‪ .5‬اﻟﺟوذري ‪ ،‬ﺣﯾﺎوي وﯾوﻩ ﻋطﯾﺔ ‪ . 2006 .‬ﺗﺎﺛﯾر ﻧوﻋﯾﺔ ﻣﯾﺎﻩ اﻟري وﻣﻐﻧطﺗﻬﺎ وﻣﺳﺗوﯾﺎت اﻟﺳﻣﺎد اﻟﺑوﺗﺎﺳﻲ ﻓﻲ‬
‫ﺑﻌض ﺻﻔﺎت اﻟﺗرﺑﺔ اﻟﻛﯾﻣﯾﺎﺋﯾﺔ وﻧﻣووﺣﺎﺻل اﻟذرﻩ اﻟﺻﻔراء ‪ .‬رﺳﺎﻟﺔ ﻣﺎﺟﺳﺗﯾر – ﻛﻠﯾﺔ اﻟزراﻋﺔ –‬
‫ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺑﻐداد‪.‬‬
‫‪6. Tkatchenko, U.1997. Report at the international Symposium on sustainable‬‬
‫‪magnetic 0f salt effected soil in the arid ecosystem , Cario ,Egypt.‬‬
‫‪7. Herodiza ,G. 1999. Observation result about the effect of magnetic tools a series of‬‬
‫‪Magnetotorn size 1- Made by Magnetic Technologyies LLC-Un to the‬‬
‫‪grwth of consumption plant and vegetable horticulture , Collection of state‬‬
‫‪documents‬‬ ‫‪its translation on application technologies (L.L.C) Dubai‬‬
‫‪,U.A.E.‬‬
‫‪8. Hummadi ,K.B. 2000. Use of drainage water as a Source of irrigation water for‬‬
‫‪crop production .The Iraqi J . Agric .Sci .31 (2) : 573- 584.‬‬
‫‪ .9‬اﻟﻣوﺳوي ‪ ،‬ﻋدﻧﺎن ﺷﺑﺎر ﻓﺎﻟﺢ‪ .2000 .‬ﺗﺎﺛﯾر ادارة اﻟري ﺑﺎﺳﺗﺧدام اﻟﻣﯾﺎﻩ اﻟﻣﺎﻟﺣﺔ ﻓﻲ ﺧﺻﺎﺋص اﻟﺗرﺑﺔ وﺣﺎﺻل‬
‫اﻟذرة اﻟﺻﻔراء ‪ .‬رﺳﺎﻟﺔ ﻣﺎﺟﺳﺗﯾر ‪ .‬ﻛﻠﯾﺔ اﻟزراﻋﺔ ‪ .‬ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺑﻐداد ‪.‬‬
‫‪ .10‬ﺣﺳن ‪ ،‬ﻗﺗﯾﺑﺔ ﻣﺣﻣد وﻋﻠﻲ ﻋﺑد ﻓﻬد و ﻋدﻧﺎن ﺷﺑﺎر ﻓﺎﻟﺢ وطﺎرق ﻟﻔﺗﻪ رﺷﯾد ‪ . 2005 .‬اﻟﺗﻛﯾﯾف اﻟﻣﻐﻧﺎطﯾﺳﻲ‬
‫ﻟﺧواص اﻟﻣﯾﺎﻩ اﻟﻣﺎﻟﺣﺔ ﻻﻏراض ري اﻟﻣﺣﺎﺻﯾل ‪ -1‬زﻫرة اﻟﺷﻣس ‪ .‬ﻣﺟﻠﺔ اﻟﻌﻠوم اﻟزراﻋﯾﺔ اﻟﻌراﻗﯾﺔ‬
‫‪. 28 -23 : (1) 36 .‬‬
‫‪11. Soil Survey Staff . 1975. Soil Taxonomy. Handbook. USDA. Washington D.C.‬‬

‫‪37‬‬
12. Richards ,L.A. 1954 . Diagnosis and improvement of saline and alkaline soils .
USDA. Handbook 60. Washington DC.
13. Page ,A .L. ,R. H. Miller and D.R . Keeney .1982. Methods of soils analysis part
(2) . 2nd Ed. Agronomy 9.
14. Martin ,H.W. and D.L. Sparks. 1983 . Kinetics of non-exchangeable Potassium
release form tow coastal plain soils. Soil .Sci. Soc. Am.J.47:883-887.
15. Black , C.A. 1965. Methods of soil analysis . Amer. Soc. Of Agron.Inc. USA.
16. Gresser , M.E . and G. W. Parsons. 1979. Sulphuric , Perchloric and digestion of
plant material for determination Nitrogen , Phosphorus ,Potassium,
Calicium and Mamne-ssium , analytiecal chemical. Acta . 109: 431-436.
17. Mass , E.V. 1986. Salt tolerance of plant . Applied Agric .Res. 1: 12 -26.
18. Havlin , J. L., J.D.Beaton ,S.L. Tisdale and W.L.Nelson . 2005. Soil fertility and
fertilizers : 7th Ed . An intoduc-tion to nutrient management.Upper Saddle
River ,New Jersey .
‫ اﻟري ﺑﺎﻟﻣﯾﺎﻩ‬2000 . ‫ ﻋﻠﻲ وﻋﺑد اﻟﺣﺳن وﻧﺎس ﻋﻠﻲ وﺟﻌﻔر ﺟﺑﺎر ﻋﺑد اﻟرﺿﺎ واﻣﯾرة ﺣﻧون ﻋطﯾﻪ‬،‫ ﻓﻬد‬.19
‫اﻟﻣﺎﻟﺣﺔ ﻟﻣﺣﺻول اﻟذرة اﻟﺻﻔراء اﻋﺗﻣﺎدا ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣراﺣل اﻟﻧﻣو وﺗﺎﺛﯾر ذﻟك ﻓﻲ ﺣﺎﺻل اﻟﻧﺑﺎت واﻟﺗراﻛم‬
. 129 -120 : 5 . ‫ ﻣﺟﻠﺔ اﻟزراﻋﺔ اﻟﻌراﻗﯾﺔ‬. ‫اﻟﻣﻠﺣﻲ‬

38