Professional Documents
Culture Documents
www.elsevier.com/locate/compstruct
Abstract
Finite element solutions are presented for the optimal multiobjective design of symmetrically laminated rectangular plates subject
to a combination of simply supported, clamped and free boundary conditions. The design objective is the maximisation of the
biaxial buckling load and resonance frequency by determining the ®bre orientation optimally with the eects of bending±twisting
coupling taken into account. The ®nite element method coupled with an optimisation routine is employed in analysing and opti-
mising the laminated plate designs. The eect of boundary conditions and bending±twisting coupling on the optimal ply angles and
the buckling load are numerically studied. In addition, the multiobjective results are also compared to single objective design
results. Ó 2001 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
0263-8223/01/$ - see front matter Ó 2001 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
PII: S 0 2 6 3 - 8 2 2 3 ( 0 1 ) 0 0 1 1 4 - 3
390 M. Walker / Composite Structures 54 (2001) 389±393
multiobjective design solutions for a variety of boundary where P and PSr are potential energies of the plate and
conditions. the element, respectively, and u is the displacement
The present study deals with the optimal design of vector. Using the same shape functions associated with
biaxially loaded laminated plates subject to ferent node i
i 1; 2; . . . ; n, Si
x; y, for interpolating the
combinations of free, simply supported and clamped variables in each element, we can write
edges for a maximum weighted combination of buckling Xn
load and resonance frequency. The study is complicated u Si
x; yui ;
2
because the eects of bending±twisting coupling are in- i1
cluded in the procedure. The ®nite element formulation where ui is the value of the displacement vector corre-
which is used in the present study is based on Mindlin sponding to node i, and is given by
type theory for laminated composite plates. This mul- n oT
i
i
i
tiobjective study illustrates that improved buckling and u u0 ; v0 ; w0 ; w
i
x ; w
i
y :
3
resonance performance can be obtained from plates
which are designed in this fashion. The multiobjective The static buckling problem reduces to a generalised
results are also compared to single objective design eigenvalue problem of the conventional form, viz.
results.
K kKG fug 0;
4
where K is the stiness matrix and KG is the initial
stress matrix. The lowest eigenvalue of the homogeneous
2. Finite element formulation system (4) yields the buckling load.
The free vibration problem also reduces to a gener-
Consider a symmetrically laminated rectangular plate alised eigenvalue problem of the conventional form, viz.
of length a, width b and thickness H which consists of n
C w2 Gff g 0;
5
orthotropic layers with ®bre angles hk , k 1; 2; . . . ; K, as
shown in Fig. 1 The plate is de®ned in the Cartesian where C is the stiness matrix and G is the mass
coordinates x, y and z with axes x and y lying on the matrix in the case of free vibrations, and [12]
middle surface of the plate. The plate is subjected to T
ff g fwmn ; fxmn ; fymn ; gxmn ; gymn ; u0mn ; u0mn g
6
biaxial compressive forces Nx and Ny in the x and y di-
rections, respectively, as shown in Fig. 1 and is free to with m and n being the half-wave numbers. The lowest
vibrate. Plates with these characteristics are commonly eigenvalue of the homogeneous system (5) yields the
known as symmetric angle-ply laminates. resonance frequency.
Let the region S of the plate be divided into n sub- Lastly, the following non-dimensionalised quantities
regions Sr
Sr 2 S; r 1; 2; . . . ; n such that are de®ned:
Ncr w
N ; F
7
N0 w0
for critical buckling strength, and resonance frequency,
respectively. In Eq. (7) the subscript `0' denotes the
values of Ncr and w for a
0°=0°= =0°sym laminate.
Fig. 3. Eect of the weighting ratio l2 on the ®bre angle for (S,S,S,S)
4. Numerical results and (C,C,C,C) square plates with k 1.
Table 1
In¯uence of boundary conditions and aspect ratio on the design index and optimal ®bre angle with l2 0:5, and k 1
a=b S,S,S,S F,S,F,S F,S,C,S C,S,C,S C,C,C,C
DI hopt DI hopt DI hopt DI hopt DI hopt
0.5 4.78 19.2 4.65 19.2 4.60 18.9 4.66 19.2 4.40 26.5
0.6 3.14 21.1 3.03 21.1 3.03 21.1 3.03 21.1 2.29 33.5
0.7 2.31 26.7 2.26 26.3 2.26 26.3 2.41 63.6 1.18 31.2
0.8 2.01 26.7 1.92 26.3 1.93 26.6 2.31 61.7 2.00 30.1
0.9 1.49 37.3 1.42 23.2 1.18 17.7 1.89 58.3 1.44 31.3
1.0 1.22 45.0 1.21 19.2 1.18 19.2 1.75 54.7 1.18 54.7
1.25 0.94 65.6 1.18 24.5 1.18 24.5 1.42 62.8 1.42 57.7
1.5 0.88 67.1 0.47 21.1 0.50 55.5 1.20 58.3 0.72 55.5
2.0 0.76 63.6 0.30 28.2 0.38 75.9 0.81 58.6 0.57 55.5
Table 2
In¯uence of loading ratio and aspect ratio on the design index and optimal ®bre angle for plates with S,S,S,S or C,C,C,C boundary conditions and
l2 0:5
a=b k0 k 0:5 k1 k0 k 0:5 k1
S,S,S,S S,S,S,S S,S,S,S C,C,C,C C,C,C,C C,C,C,C
Table 3
In¯uence of the weighting factor and aspect ratio on the design index and optimal ®bre angle for S,S,S,S plates with k 1
a=b l2 0 l2 0:25 l2 0:5 l2 0:75 l2 1
DI hopt DI hopt DI hopt DI hopt DI hopt
0.5 4.66 71.7 5.12 21.1 4.78 19.2 5.11 23.2 1.31 24.8
0.6 2.69 73.8 2.92 29.6 3.14 21.1 3.37 21.1 1.34 23.2
0.7 2.12 2.96 2.23 44.4 2.31 26.7 2.51 22.3 1.30 21.3
0.8 1.93 44.4 1.94 37.3 2.01 26.7 2.04 26.3 1.33 27.4
0.9 1.29 79.1 1.36 60.6 1.49 37.3 1.62 37.3 1.42 39.9
1.0 1.18 71.7 1.24 55.5 1.22 45.0 1.45 44.4 1.52 45.0
1.25 1.12 24.5 1.21 59.3 0.94 65.6 1.70 65.0 1.93 61.8
1.5 0.45 55.5 0.66 67.1 0.88 67.1 1.10 68.3 2.95 68.0
2.0 0.28 55.2 0.51 63.6 0.76 63.6 1.01 65.9 5.06 65.1
DI 1:18) while N 1:26. Similarly, for l2 1, the layers. Five dierent boundary condition cases are also
value of DI is the value of N as predicted in Table 3 investigated.
(where DI 1:52) while F 1:26. The ®nite element method was used in the analysis of
the plates, and coupled with an optimisation routine.
The FEM was chosen for the study because complicat-
ing eects like bending±twisting coupling are included in
5. Conclusions the procedure. The ®nite element formulation which is
used in the present study is based on Mindlin type the-
A multiobjective design study is carried out with the ory for laminated composite plates.
objective being the maximisation of the weighted sum of Graphs showing the eect of the ®bre angle h on the
the critical buckling load and resonance frequency. Design Index DI illustrate that the maximum Design
Symmetrically laminated rectangular plates subjected to Index for a given boundary condition and aspect ratio
biaxial in-plane loads are considered, each having four occurs at a speci®c value of the ®bre angle (referred to as
M. Walker / Composite Structures 54 (2001) 389±393 393
References
[1] Bert CW, Chen TLC. Optimal design of composite material plates
to resist buckling under biaxial compression. Trans Jpn Soc
Compos Mater 1976;2:7±10.
[2] Hirano Y. Optimal design of laminated plates under axial
compression. AIAA J 1979;17(9):1017±9.
[3] Wang JTS. Best angles against buckling for rectangular laminates.
In: Hayashi T, Kawata K, Umekawa S, editors. Progress in
Science and Engineering of Composites, Proceedings of the
Fourth International Conference on Composite Materials,
ICCM-IV, 1982; Tokyo.
[4] Tang J. On optimal design of laminated plates and the eect of
coupling between bending and extension. Comput Struct Mech
Appl 1984;1:75±84 [in Chinese].
[5] Joshi SPS, Iyengar NGR. Optimal design of laminated composite
plates under axial compression. Trans Can Soc Mech Eng
Fig. 4. Trade-o curve for square (S,S,S,S) plate with k 1. 1985;9:45±50.
[6] Miki M. Optimal design of ®brous laminated composite plates
subject to axial compression. In: Kawata K, Umekawa S,
the optimal ®bre angle hopt ), and this value can be sev- Kobayashi A, editors. Composites 86: Recent Advances in Japan
eral times higher than the buckling load at other ®bre and the United States, 1986; Tokyo. p. 673±80.
angles. This fact emphasises the importance of carrying [7] Walker M, Adali S, Verijenko VE. Optimization of symmetric
laminates for maximum buckling load including the eects of
out optimisation in design work of this nature to obtain bending±twisting coupling. Comput Struct 1996;58:313±9.
the best performance of ®bre composite plates. [8] Iyengar NGR, Umaretiya JR. Transverse vibrations of hybrid
Generally speaking, it was found that the boundary laminated plates. J Vib Sound 1986;104:78±90.
conditions had little in¯uence on the Design Index, but a [9] Rao SS, Singh K. Optimum design of laminates with natural
marked eect on the optimal ®bre angles, and that DI frequency constraints. J Vib Sound 1979;67:101±12.
[10] Bert CW. Optimal design of a composite material plate to
increased as the plate aspect ratio increased. Also, as the maximise its fundamental frequency. J Vib Sound 1977;66:565±76.
loading ratio k increased, so hopt increased, while as the [11] Adali S, Duy KJ. Optimal hybridisation of antisymmetric angle-
weighting factor l2 increased, so both DI and hopt also ply laminater undergoing free vibrations. Eng Opt 1992;18:287±
increased. 301.
This multiobjective study illustrates that improved [12] Ren JG, Owen DRG. Vibration and buckling of laminted plates.
Int J Solids Struct 1989;25:95±106.
buckling and resonance performance can, in general, be [13] Haftka RT, G urdal Z. Elements of structural optimisation. 3rd
obtained from plates which are designed in this fashion. ed. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1992.
The multiobjective results are also compared to single
objective design results.