The Peer Review

Student Name: Jobair Alam

Student ID: 19102055
Group: Businesscell

Peer Evaluations are mandatory and need to be submitted at the time of submitting your final
assignment.
A: Attendance at C: Quality of
NAME of GROUP B: Completion of Overall evaluation
group meetings contribution
MEMBER assigned tasks (/100) (=(A+B+C)/3)
(/100) (/100)

Taiyabur Rahman 100 85 90 91.66

Nadia Afrin Esha 100 95 90 95

Nazrul Islam Bulbul 100 80 85 88.3

Additional Comments: we all attended all the meetings and completed our assigned tasks.
Taiyabur called the meetings, we all gathered the information. Bulbul was a little weak in
communicating with the team. Esha did a lot of writing and lastly I compiled the whole project
into one.

RATING FORM FOR GROUP MEMBER'S CONTRIBUTION TO THE PROJECT 

Using the scale to the right, rate each of your teammates on each of the evaluation criteria
listed below. For example, if you believe your teammate has done a "good" job relative to the
first criteria, then place a "5" in the blank next to that criteria. 

Rate yourself on the right side below

 
7 - extremely good
6 - very good
5 – good
4 - somewhat good
3 - neither good nor bad
2 - somewhat bad
1 - bad 
0 - terrible
The results of this evaluation are confidential. Your teammates will be told their average
scores. 
PERSON PREPARING THIS RATING: Jobair Alam

PROJECT NAME: Sexism accusations against United States Soccer Federation.

TEAM MEMBERS’ NAMES: First Name: Taiyabur

Last name: Rahman

Attendance at group meetings 7

Quality of contribution to group discussions 7
Quality of contribution to writing the questionnaire 4
Amount of time spent on project compared to other members 5
Quality of contribution to writing final report 7
Quality of initiative when something needed to get done 7
Reliability in completing assigned responsibilities __ __5 
Contribution to presentation ___7
Quality of teamwork _ __7
Contribution to team spirit __ 6
 

TOTAL SCORE 62

COMMENTS: He took the task of managing all our work. So, he called the meetings and see if
everyone had done their assigned task. He also did the conclusion part.
TEAM MEMBERS’ NAMES: First Name: Nadia
Last name: Esha

Attendance at group meetings 7

Quality of contribution to group discussions 7
Quality of contribution to writing the questionnaire 6
Amount of time spent on project compared to other members 7
Quality of contribution to writing final report 7
Quality of initiative when something needed to get done 7
Reliability in completing assigned responsibilities __ __6
Contribution to presentation ___5
Quality of teamwork _ __6
Contribution to team spirit __ 6
 

TOTAL SCORE 64

COMMENTS: As our assigned tasks she had to do most of the work. I did the introductions also

gathered information. She did the discussion part where there was most of the writing.
TEAM MEMBERS’ NAMES: First Name: Nazrul
Last name: Islam

Attendance at group meetings 6

Quality of contribution to group discussions 5
Quality of contribution to writing the questionnaire 6
Amount of time spent on project compared to other members 5
Quality of contribution to writing final report 6
Quality of initiative when something needed to get done 6
Reliability in completing assigned responsibilities __ __7 
Contribution to presentation ___5
Quality of teamwork _ __7
Contribution to team spirit __ 7
 

TOTAL SCORE 60

COMMENTS: He is a little weak when it comes to communication. So, we had to specify what
he had to do and how he should do it. He did the Bibliography. So, he had to research quite a
lot.