BBB3103

Proposing a Community Project

Step 3

1. Each member should have his or her different ideas for each item in the table below.
2. Meet with teammates.
3. Take 60 minutes to discuss the following items.

My Ideas
1. What project can you Has been agreed on. If you have more ideasjot it down
here.
do to help them?

2. Describe your project Give details such as activities, time, venue

3. Who can help you with Government organisation?/ school?

your project?

4. SWOT analysis

Strength

Weakness

Opportunity

Threat

5. How do you want to

spend the RM5K-15K?

6. What are the

things/skills/knowledge
that you want the
participants to bring
back with them after
your project?
 TEAM MEMBER EVALUATION C (END OF PROJECT)
YOUR NAME: _________________AHMAD BAHIYUDDIN AZMI_______________
Enter the names and UK numbers of your team members. DON NOT enter your own name here.

M Tan Jia Xin UK36227 M3 Muhamad Faiz Bin Yaacob UK36319

1. .
M Muhammad Syakir Zufayri Bin Zulfakar UK34480
2.
Reflecting on your teammates participation within the group project, rate each teammate using the following rubric. Add your
teammates names at the bottom of the rubric and corresponding points you award them. The teamwork points will be averaged
and figured into your teammates final grade.
Trait Criteria Score for
Teammates
1 2 3 4 M M M
1 2 3
1 Attentive The teammate gave The teammate gave The teammate gave The teammate always 4 4 4
little focus on project about 50% focus on about 80% focus on gave 100% focus on the
and was always busy project and only was project and only discussion and did not
with other work such as often distracted by other sometimes was do other work such as
answering messages on work such as answering distracted by other work answering messages on
hand phone, working on messages on hand such as answering hand phone.
other assignment, going phone. messages on hand
to toilet, being absent. phone.
2 Responsibl The teammate often did The teammate The teammate The teammate always 4 4 4
e not do what s/he was sometimes did and consistently did what went above and beyond
supposed to do. some other time did not s/he was supposed to the required duties.
do what s/he was do.
supposed to do.
3 Hardworkin The teammate hardly The teammate did what The teammate was The teammate carried 4 4 4
g tried to help the group in was needed to be done always prepared with out more than his/ her
finding materials and and sometimes the the materials that s/he fair share of the work
info for the project. materials s/he brought should bring to the and provided the group
were not sufficient. discussion or project. with all the necessary
info and materials.
4 Helpful The teammate never The teammate The teammate offered The teammate always 4 4 4
offered assistance to sometimes offered assistance to each other offered assistance to
 other teammates. assistance to others. most of the time. other members.
5 A follower The teammate never The teammate tried to The teammate The teammate always 4 4 4
-- leader acted like a leader and lead the project but it sometimes acted as a acted like a leader and
even if s/he did, the was working out well. leader for some parts of contributed significantly
project would not the project, but not all. to the success of the
succeed. project.

Trait 1 2 3 4 M1 M2 M3
6 A good The teammate was not The teammate sometime The teammate rarely The teammate listened 4 4 4
listener listening to the interrupted the interrupted while others patiently with interest,
discussion and if s/he did discussion to put forth were speaking but at did not interrupt while
listen, the person would own ideas, was a bit times sometimes put another member was
attack the ideas, advised impatient with speakers ideas into the speakers speaking, looked at the
others on own ideas and who paused and lost for mouth, patiently listened speaker in the eyes and
acted smart. words, and ideas given with interest but at times reflected back on what
by others were often not did not reflect on the were said during the
good enough. ideas given by others. discussion.
7 Persuasi The teammate was not The teammates The teammate The teammate always 4 4 4
ve confident with his own expression of ideas was expressed ideas expressed ideas in a
ideas let alone to a bit vague, long winded somewhat clearly and concise and clear
convince others. and a bit difficult to confidently, but in an manner and confidently.
understand. When elaborate and detailed It was fun and easy to
challenged, s/he became manner and came across understand and never
mousy and to be a bit pushy. pushy.
unconvincing.
8 Respect The teammate was not The teammate showed The teammate treated The teammate always 4 4 4
sensitive of others less respect to other others with civility and treated others with
opinions, ideas or members by always courtesy most of the civility and courtesy, was
feelings and rarely being late to most time, was somewhat sensitive to other
thought or pondered meetings and expected sensitive to other peoples feelings and
before s/he spoke or others to do all the work. peoples feelings and never insult or made fun
acted. rarely insult or made fun of others.
of others.
9 Critical The teammate never The teammate The teammate The teammate always 4 4 4
thinker interacted, discussed, or sometimes interacted, interacted, discussed, or interacted, discussed, or
posed questions to other discussed, but posed posed critical questions posed critical questions
team members. insignificant questions to to other team members to other team members.
other team members. most of the time.
10 A strong The teammate preferred The teammate The teammate The teammate always 4 4 4
team to work alone and sometimes offered time sometimes offered time offered time and ideas
member almost never was a part and ideas for this project and ideas for this project for this project and sat
of the group. but did not always sit and sometimes sat with with the group until
with the group to see the the group to work on the project was completed.
completion of the project.
project.
Total 40 40
score 40