CHAPTER 1: MORAL AND NON-MORAL STANDARDS

ASSESSMENT

1.

Ethics Similarities Morality

 Ehtics is the Ehtics and Morality on the

Philosophical study
of the nature of
good life of right
action and of
duty and obligation
to do good.
Morality is about other hand is about
what is right and the rules that govern
wrong. Some the promotion of
things are right human goodness. so
others are wrong. that individuals and
the society

2. Describe the nature and purpose of morality.

The nature of moral principles is to lead or moral life one follow moral principles while
the morality living ethically assures that everyone will flourish although morality may restrict our
freedom acting morally upright brings greater freedom to do good to oneself and to other.

3.

Moral Non- Moral

*Moral standards the rules people have about * Non- Moral Standards refer to rules that
the kinds of action are morally right and are unrelated to ethical consideration.
wrong as well as the valve they place on
them.
CHAPTER 2. THE MORAL EXPERIENCE

ASSESSMENT

On a separate sheet of paper, answer directly the following question.

1. Enumerate and discuss the elements of moral experience?

Moral agent  is a person who has the ability to discern right from wrong and to be held
accountable for his or her own actions. Moral agents responsibility not
to cause unjustified harm.

Moral Act are the things done by the agents or people who makes action. is an action that is
freely chosen and comes into existence through our
exercise of reason and will. 

2. Explain the nature of prohibited acts.

Nature of prohibited acts cannot be habitual and enduring because if they do this cease
it becomes forbidden.

3. Describe innate foundations of Moral experience using your personal experience.

We find this desire in ourselves, we are a part of the community of morality researchers
that has long been divided on the question of moral innateness. This makes us uncomfortable,
for we really like and value the many members of our community, and we have tried, to show
how all are right about something, all have something to contribute.
CHAPTER 3: THE MORAL DILEMMA

1. Write your personal experience about having a moral dilemma. What happened? What were
the options that you need to choose from? What was your decision? How did you decide? Limit
your story to three paragraphs only.

Last week Sunday morning my friend invited me for his/her birthday but on Monday
morning our barangay will be lockdown for two weeks. So I told my friend that I can`t come to
his birthday, because I cannot go back to our barangay before it got lockdown for two weeks.

2. Then, answer these questions and provide explanations to your answer. Limit your answer to
each in exactly five sentences.

A. In what level was your dilemma?

For me it was just a piece of cake, it depends on how individual response the situation.

B. Was your decision based on moral reasoning or a mere opinion?

I think it was a moral reasoning considering the cause and effect in the situation may it
be bad or good.