Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Throughout this paper, I aim to model and calculate the volume of a rugby ball using
mathematics. More specifically, I will attempt to model the shape of a rugby ball and use it to
find its volume and possibly explore further how the radius of the ball changes this measurement.
I have chosen this specific topic as the shape of a rugby ball is not of normal spherical shape and
I wonder how mathematics can be used to find its volume without the presence of traditional
volume equations for this shape. For this investigation, all units are rounded to three significant
With 4.5 million people tuning in to this year’s National Rugby League, the rugby ball
has become amongst the most well-known sports balls of our time (Walsh). However, unlike the
traditional spherical shapes of most sports balls, these balls have their unique oval shape and
hence the method of calculating their volumes would be different. These balls come in a variety
of specific shapes and sizes. Hence, this report will first focus on finding and ultimately
exploring the volume of a size 5 rugby ball where its longest length spans 28cm (Promotional
Rugby Balls).
Before this exploration starts, the definition of volume must be identified. Volume is
defined as how much a 3-dimensional shape can hold (the capacity of the figure) and is measured
in cubic units (Surface Area and the Volume of Cylinders and Cones).
Fig. 1. A demonstration of how a prolate spheroid is created through the rotation of a 2-
dimensional ellipse on its major axis by 180 degrees. Drawn by Yichan Kim, 8 October
2020.
Moving on, the shape of a rugby ball is defined as a prolate spheroid (Mathematical
rotating a 2-dimensional ellipse by its major axis as seen in fig. 1 (Spheroids and Spheres).
Therefore, using the knowledge that the shape of a rugby ball can be made by rotating an ellipse
180 degrees and the definition of volume, the volume of the rugby ball can be found by dividing
the rugby ball shape by a near-infinite amount of circles and adding up each circle’s area. This
method is called the solid of revolution by disks in which a single curve is rotated around the x
axis (Svirin).
Fig. 2. A top-down view of a rugby ball that will be used to graph the shape of the prolate
spheroid on a 2-axis shape. “R500 Rugby Ball”. Decathlon. www.decathlon.vn. This exploration
will first start with the volume calculation of a size 5 rugby ball using the method of solid
revolution by disks. To do so, the shape of a rugby ball must first be graphed on a Cartesian
plane. Considering that the scale of all rugby balls (the ratio between length and width) is the
same for all sizes, a top-down picture of a rugby ball could be imported to a graphing software
and scaled so that it matches the size of a size 5 rugby ball. The top-down view picture has been
chosen from a sporting goods store website (see fig. 2). After importing the image on Desmos, a
default scale of 10 has been applied to both the width and height of the image. However, as the
calculation would be much easier if 1 unit in the Cartesian plane would equal 1cm, the image
5 rugby ball with the correct scale of 1 unit to 1cm. The longest width of a size 5 rugby ball is
28cm (Promotional Rugby Balls). In other words, the width of the ball in Desmos must span
between the coordinates (−14,0) and (14,0) (half of the width as the ball is centered at the
origin) considering the scale of 1 unit to 1cm. However, as the width of the ball on Desmos (at
scale 10) spans between the coordinates (−4.88,0) and (4.88,0), the scale of the image must be
���� = ��
Where �� represents how long the image spans (width) per 1 inputted scale, ��
represents the inputted scale on Desmos and �� represents the width of the shape of the rugby
ball. Using the coordinates of the two horizontal ends ((−4.88,0) and (4.88,0)) of the ball when
�� =976
1000
This specific value of �� would mean that as the scale on Desmos increases by 1 unit,
the width of the rugby ball would also increase by 0.976 units on the plane. Using this scale to
find variable ��, the value of the inputted scale for the image of the ball to be of a certain
976
1000 �� = 28.0
�� =1750
61
4
As the proportion of the height of the image must stay constant with the width of the
image (1 to 1 ratio as both the scale of the width and height of the image is 10.0), the value
�� must be inputted in both the height and width scales of the image. As a result, the width
of the ball spans from (−14,0) and (14,0), which is exactly 28 units wide. Using the
conversion of 1 unit on the axis to 1 cm, the ball will span 28cm, which follows the exact
dimension of a size 5 rugby ball. Furthermore, the rugby ball’s height spans from (0, −9) and
(0,9).
As stated previously, the shape of a rugby ball is an ellipse rotated by its major axis 180
degrees. Therefore, to graph the shape of a rugby ball on a 2-dimensional axis, it is most suitable
to graph the shape as an ellipse. The ellipse equation is as follows (Ellipse Equation from
Graph):
(�� − ℎ)2
2
�� +(�� − ��)2
2
�� = 1
Where (ℎ, ��) is the coordinates of the center of the ellipse, �� is the horizontal radius and
�� is the vertical radius. As the image is centered at the origin on the Cartesian plane,
variable ℎ and �� will be zero. Also, given that the farthest horizontal and vertical points are
(−14,0), (14,0) and (0, −9), (0,9), variable �� = 14, and �� = 9. Substituting these
variables: (�� − 0)2
2
14 +(�� − 0)2
2
9 =1
Therefore, the simplified equation that would graph the outline of the rugby ball on a 2-
2
196 +��
��2
81 = 1
This would be the equation of the ellipse that would outline the perimeter of the rugby
Fig. 3. Comparison between the rugby ball image and the ellipse equation made. Taken by
From fig. 3, the ellipse equation somewhat resembles the rugby ball shape (scaled at the
right size). However, it must be noted that the equation does not fully encompass the perimeter
of the rugby ball. Now that the shape of the rugby ball on a 2-dimension axis is graphed the
prolate spheroid (rugby ball) can be split into a nearly infinite number of circles and the area of
each circle can be added to find the volume. This is called the solid of revolution of disks that
derivatives and integration must first be obtained. Derivatives are a method of finding the
gradient (rate of change) of the curve at a specific point (Introduction to Derivatives) and is the
Progressing with derivatives, the formula for finding the slope of a line is the following
�� =∆��
∆��
6
Where �� represents the slope of the function (��(��)), ∆�� represents the
change in ��- coordinates of a function and ∆�� represents the change in ��-
coordinate of the function. Therefore, the slope equation can be modeled as the following
Like the slice analogy when discussing the accuracy of finding the area between the
curve and x-axis (integration), the smaller the difference between two ��-coordinate values
(as ∆�� approaches 0), the calculation will be more accurate. Referring to this, the derivative
is found by simplifying the above slope equation and make ∆�� approaches zero. Using
3 1 3
3(�� + ∆��) + �� − ( 3�� + ��)
1
��′(��) = ∆��
1 3
− 3��
1
′
�� (��) = Further simplifying the equation:
∆��
1
��′(��) =��2∆�� + ∆��2�� + 3∆��3
∆��
1
��′(��) = ��2 + ∆���� + 3∆��2
��′(��) = ��2
7
Therefore, it can be stated that the derivative of the function ��(��) =13��3 +
�� where �� is any real number is ��′(��) = ��2. Therefore, the gradient of the
function at a specific point would be the ��-coordinate of that specific point substituted into
��′(��). As said previously, integral and derivatives are opposites (the process of
integration is reverse for derivatives). Furthermore, as
would still be ��′(��) = ��2, when finding the integral of a function, the result function
must be added by a constant ��. This is called the constant of integration (Weisstein).
conducted. Integration is a mathematical method that is mainly used to find the area between a
curve and the x-axis by adding up an infinite amount of lines of length of the curve with width
Consider the function ��(��) = 2, which is illustrated on the left side of fig. 4. Our
goal is to find an area function that will give the area between the function and x-axis between
the two points �� = �� (not to be confused with natural exponent) and �� = ��. It is
to be noted that the derivative of �� = 2�� + �� is ��′ = 2. The area function can be
illustrated as:
�� ����
����(��) = ∫ 2 ��
8
As the area of a rectangle is its height multiplied by its width, the area between the ��(��)
function and the x-axis between the two points (shaded area) can be illustrated as the
It can be observed that an integral can be solved (area between a curve ��(��)
and the x axis) through ��(��) − ��(��) where ��(��) = 2�� + ��, or
To further verify this statement, consider another function ℎ(��) = 2��, which is
illustrated on the right side of fig. 5. Our goal is to find an area function that will give the area
between the function and x-axis between the two points �� = �� and �� = ��. It is to
be noted that the derivative of �� = ��2 + �� is ��′ = 2��. The area function can be
illustrated as:
��
��ℎ(��) = ∫ 2�� �� ����
As the area of a trapezium is found by multiplying the average of its two different sides
lengths by its width, the area between the ℎ(��) function and the x-axis between the two
2) (�� − ��)
This further proves the previous finding that an integral can be solved (area between a relation
and x-axis) through finding the reverse/backward derivative (antiderivative) and finding the
difference between the two points substituted into the anti-derivative function (Martin 636). In
other words, the definite integral function will equate as follows (Dave): ��
Where ��′(��) represents the function that is put into the integral, the integral
symbol ∫����represents finding the area between the function and x-axis from the x-
coordinates of point �� to point ��.
Now that an equation for solving integration is found, how the integral is used to
calculate the area between a curve and the x-axis between two different points will be discussed
To find the area between the top half of the ellipse of this curve and the x-axis, parts of the
curve could be split up by rectangles of the same width ∆�� and the area of each rectangle
could be added together to find the area between the curve and x-axis. Likewise, from fig. 5,
10
rectangles of width 1 (∆�� = 1) are used to calculate the area. However, the final area
calculation will not be accurate as it can be observed that the rectangles do not fully enclose the
Fig. 6. An illustration of finding the area between the curve and the x-axis through rectangles of
width that approaches 0 (∆�� → 0). Illustrated by Yichan Kim, 13 October 2020. However, it
can be observed that as the width of the rectangle decreases, the area calculation between the
curve and x-axis will be more accurate. As seen in fig. 6, as the width of the rectangle
approaches zero (∆�� → 0) the sum of the area of the rectangles will become more accurate
in finding the area between the curve and x-axis. As lines in geometry have no width, fig. 6
shows the illustration of the area between the curve and x-axis through an infinite number of
lines. The notation of finding the area between the curve ��(��) and the x-axis from the x
coordinate points �� and �� (�� < ��) with the width of the rectangles approaching
��
∫ ��(��) �� ����
Now instead of illustrating an area between a curve and the x-axis through an infinite
number of lines (Dimensions), this integration formula will be used to find the volume of the
11
rugby ball. To do so, instead of the use of 2-dimensional lines, circles of its center point on the x
axis and radius of the y coordinate of the curve ��(��) will be used. This would mean that
the shape of the rugby ball (prolate spheroid) would be composed of an infinite amount of
circles aligned by its center point on the major axis (x-axis) with radius of the y-coordinate
Fig. 7. An
illustration of the circle that is infinitely present in a prolate spheroid. The center point of the
circle is aligned on the x-axis and the radii of the circles are the y-coordinate of the curve
(��(��)). Drawn by Yichan Kim, 16 October 2020.
As the shape of a rugby ball (prolate spheroid) is a 3-dimensional shape and as the shape
of a circle is a 2-dimensional shape, there consists an infinite number of circles in the prolate
spheroid. As seen in fig. 7, the center point of the circles is all aligned on the x-axis. The radius
of the circles is the y-coordinate of the curve, ��(��). The equation of the area of a circle is
the following:
�� = ����2
Where �� is the area of the circle and �� is the radius of the particular circle. Lines that
consist between the curve and the x-axis in the above integration formula will be represented as
the radius of each circle (�� = ��(��)). As there is an infinite number of circles in a
prolate spheroid, the integration formula must be used to represent that there would be an
infinite
12
number of circles between points �� and ��. Using the area equation and the integration
formula (as a prolate spheroid has an infinite number of circles), the below equation can be
formed: ��
∫ ��(��(��))2 �� ����
Where ��(��) represents the curve that outlines the top half shape of a rugby
ball on a Cartesian plane, �� represents the x-coordinate of where the curve first meets the
x-axis and �� represents the x-coordinate of where the curve last meets the x-axis as long
as �� > ��. The equation that has been found above that outlines the shape of a rugby
2
196 +��
��2
81 = 1
Isolating ��2:
��2 = 81 (1 −��2
196)
(��(��))2= 81 (1 −��2
196)
Substituting this equation with the integration formula for calculating volume (��) of a
prolate spheroid:
��
�� = ∫ 81��(1 −��2
�� ����
196)
As the curve meets the x-axis at the coordinates (−14, 0) and (14, 0), �� = −14 and ��
14
�� = ∫ 81�� (1 −��2
−14 ����
196)
13
As the curve is symmetrical about the y-axis (�� = 0), the equation can be simplified to
the following:
14
�� = 2 ∫ 81�� (1 −��2
���� Simplifying the equation:
0
196)
14 14 ����)
�� = 162��(∫ 1 0 1 2
���� − 196 ∫ �� 0
The below equation (investigated above) for finding the solution of an integral will be used
(Dave):
��
�� ���� = ��(��) −
∫ ��′(��) ��
Where ∫ ��′(��) ��(��)
��is the function that is inside the integral. As we know that the derivative of
1 1
�� = 162��((14 + ��) − (0 + ��) − 196 (( 3(143) + ��)
1
− ( 3(0) + ��))) Simplifying:
2
�� = 162�� (14 − 4 3)
Further simplifying the equation:
�� ≈ 4750
As one unit on the Cartesian plane represents one centimeter, and volume is measured in
cubic units, the volume of a size 5 rugby ball can be estimated to be 4750����3.
14
Now that the volume of a size 5 rugby ball is estimated, how the change of the radius of
the rugby ball would affect its volume will be explored. To do so, the equation that outlines the
shape of a rugby ball where the minor radius (shorter radius) is expressed in the terms of the
major radius (longer radius) must be found. Considering that all rugby balls have the same ratio
between its major and minor radius, using the major and minor radius of a size 5 rugby ball, the
14: 9
9
1: 14
This ratio would mean that the minor radius of the rugby ball (prolate spheroid) is 914 multiplied
by its major radius. The ellipse equation is as follows (Ellipse Equation from Graph): (�� −
ℎ)2
2
�� +(�� − ��)2
2
�� = 1
Where (ℎ, ��) is the coordinates of the center of the ellipse, �� is the horizontal radius
(which would be the major radius for a prolate spheroid) and �� is the vertical radius(which
will be the minor radius for the prolate spheroid). As the image will be centered at the origin
on the Cartesian plane, variable ℎ and �� will be zero. In addition, given that the minor
radius (��), is 914 multiplied by its major radius (��), the minor radius can be expressed by
9
the following: �� = 14 ��
��2
2
�� +��2
9 2
( 14 ��) = 1
15
This would be the ellipse equation that outlines the shape of a rugby ball where
��2 =81
2
196 �� −81
2
196 ��
(��(��))2=81
2
196 �� −81
2
196 ��
Now that (��(��))2is found, it can be substituted into the below equation for
finding the volume of a prolate spheroid (found above):
��
�� = ∫ ��(��(��))2 �� ����
Where (��(��))2represents the curve that outlines the full shape of a rugby ball on a
Cartesian plane, �� represents the x-coordinate of where the curve first meets the x-axis and
�� represents the x-coordinate of where the curve last meets the x-axis as long as �� >
��. As the outlined shape of a rugby ball is centered on the origin (center) of the Cartesian
plane, �� would equal the negative of the major radius (−��) and �� would equal the
negative of the major radius (��). However, as the outline of the shape of the ball is
symmetrical at the y-axis (two halves of the symmetrical shape would equal the whole shape),
��(��) = 2 ∫ �� (81
2
196 �� −81
0
2 ����
196 �� )
��(��) =27��
3
49 ��
The above formula would be an equation that would find the volume of the rugby ball
with its major radius, variable �� where {�� ∈ ℝ|�� ≠ 0}. It can therefore be said that
there exists a cubic relationship between the volume of a rugby ball and its major radius.
Furthermore, as the formula starts from �� = 0 at �� = 0, and has a positive coefficient (of
��), it can be said that the volume of the ball infinitely increases as the major radius
increases. However, as the focus of this section is to find the rates of change (gradient) of the
volume of the rugby ball with respect to its major radius, the derivative of the formula
Substitution:
27��
3
49 (�� + ∆��) −27��
3 27��
49 ��
2 2 3
∆�� 49 (3�� ∆�� + 3∆�� �� + ∆�� )
∆��
Expansion and simplification:
Further simplification:
��′(��) = ��′(��) =
��′(��) =27��
2 2
49 (3�� + 3∆��(��) + ∆�� )
��′(��) =81��
2
49 ��
The above derivative equation outlines the rate of change of the rugby ball’s volume in
cubic centimeters in relation to the length of the major radius of the rugby ball, ��. This
equation assumes that the major and minor radius of a rugby ball are proportional. As the
coefficient of �� is positive, this would mean that the rate of change of volume with
consideration with the major radius of a rugby ball would increase as the major radius
increases. Using this equation to find the rate of change of the rugby ball’s volume where its
major radius is at 14 cm (�� = 14) as an example, the equation can be used as the following:
��′(14) = 324��
≈ 1020 ����3
The rate of change of the volume of the rugby ball with a major radius of 14 cm is
1020 ����3.
Concluding the exploration, I was successfully able to complete my aim by estimating the
volume of a size five rugby ball. Furthermore, I was successfully able to use that knowledge to
create an equation that finds the value and its rate of change of the volume of a rugby ball with a
given radius. Even so, it must be noted that the curve that outlines the shape of a rugby ball does
not completely align with the perimeter of the rugby ball, hence hinting the presence of
inaccuracy in the estimation and model. Moreover, the model that estimates the volume of a
rugby ball with a given major radius assumes that the minor and major radius of a rugby ball is
proportional. This makes me wonder whether the relationship between major and minor radius of
a rugby ball is truly proportional. Therefore, a possible extension to this report could be to find
the relationship between the major and minor radius of different rugby ball sizes and hence
disprove/approve of the model’s assumption. In addition, addressing the limitation that the curve
18
outlining the rough shape of a rugby ball does not fully align to its shape, another possible
extension to this report could be to find a variety of curves that roughly outlines the shape of the
rugby ball and finding the ball’s volume using the different curves and comparing the results
with each other. In summary, a strength of this report was how I was able to successfully
estimate and create a model that finds the volume of a rugby ball with a given dimension.
However, a weakness to this report is that the model assumes something that hasn’t been proven
and that the model of the shape of the rugby ball does not fit exactly into the shape of such.
Extensions addressing these limitations have been outlined and would have definitely been
Discussing the results of this report, it was obviously expected that as the radius increases,
the volume of the rugby ball would also increase. However, a finding that wasn’t as much
expected was that there exists a cubic relationship between the volume of the rugby ball
and its major radius. Implications to the model that finds the volume of the rugby ball may vary,
but one significant effect that this may bring would be that it would increase the efficiency of
packaging and shipment of these rugby balls. The volume of the rugby ball can be used to
determine the ratio between the volume of the product (rugby ball) and its packaging – which
would be a crucial determinant when choosing from a range of packaging solutions. Although
this model may have a small implication when looked upon on a small scale, each slight increase
in the efficiency of rugby ball packaging would substantially decrease shipping and
environmental costs of these packages when done on a large scale (which is greatly possible with
19
Works Cited
Dave, Farina. “Properties of Integrals and Evaluating Definite Integrals.” Youtube. 28 April
2020.
www.khanacademy.org/math/precalculus/x9e81a4f98389efdf:conics/x9e81a4f98389efdf:
Martin, David, et al. “Integration.” Mathematics HL (Core), Haese Mathematics, pp. 628–670.
www.khanacademy.org/math/algebra/x2f8bb11595b61c86:forms-of-linear
equations/x2f8bb11595b61c86:summary-forms-of-two-variable-linear-equations/v/slope
20
desktop.arcgis.com/en/arcmap/latest/map/projections/spheroids-and-spheres.htm.
Svirin, Alex. “Volume of a Solid of Revolution: Disks and Washers.” Math24. 30 April 2020.
www.mathplanet.com/education/geometry/area/the-surface-area-and-the-volume-of pyramids-
Walsh, Dan. “Ratings through the Roof: NRL Draws 4.5 Million TV Audience.” National Rugby
Is the Mathematical Name of the Shape of a Rugby Ball?” Answers Corporation. 19 August
2007. www.answers.com/Q/What_is_the_mathematical