Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Compression Under Dynamic State
Compression Under Dynamic State
5.1 Introduction
Compression therapy is used for providing therapeutic pressure for the
treatment of venous and lymphatic diseases. The application of the external
compression helps to minimize the effect of venous hypertension by directing
fluid from the interstitial spaces back into the vascular and lymphatic
compartments [1–3]. The exercising of the calf-muscle pump and foot pump
helps in returning the blood to the heart and decreases the excess pressure in
the foot veins [4]. The calf-muscle pump acts to compress and release the deep
veins using the muscle action, hence creating extra pressure and encouraging
the return of blood to the heart. The function of calf-muscle pump gets
enhanced during compression therapy when an inelastic bandage (short-stretch
bandage) is wrapped to the limb. Extensive research works have been done
by several researchers to assess dynamic performance of different bandages
[5–20]. Inelastic bandages have been shown to create a high resistance to
expand when pressure is applied through internal muscle contraction and joint
movement. These bandages act like an artificial valve suppressing refluxes
during each muscle systole, generating a higher peak working interface
pressure and greater pressure amplitude during the movement of calf-muscle
pump, hence indicating that these materials are preferable for use when the
calf muscle is active. While in a long-stretch bandage, the force produced by
the action of the calf muscle expands the bandage, thereby losing some of its
therapeutic pressure.
The in vivo results of the interface pressure exerted by different
compression bandages in healthy volunteers in different positions (supine,
sitting, standing, exercising etc.) have been reported in the literatures [17–
19]. The variations in the circumference of the leg have also been reported
for different volunteers during walking on a treadmill. The largest difference
in the circumference between the maximal dorsiflexion and maximal plantar
flexion positions of the foot occur at the transition of the gastrocnemius
76 Science of compression bandage
muscle into the Achilles tendon (the so called B1 level according to ENV
12718:2001). The circumference varies at different parts of the leg and
also varies from person to person [22,23]. This variation in circumference
of leg is the deciding factor on the amount of the stretch occurring to a
bandage wrapped over the leg and hence this determines the interface
pressure variation. These above facts indicate that the clinical outcomes of
compression therapy depend on the stiffness of the materials as well as on
the muscle movement.
The in vivo pressure measurement should be done on the medial aspect
of the lower leg, at the B1 position according to ENV 12718:2001. The in
vivo measurement is intrusive for the volunteer, and hence it could also
cause discomfort. The procedure of in vivo pressure measurement at the
B1 region must be done with accuracy and this is not always practicable
with wounded patients. To overcome such problems of direct measurement,
the chapter describes in vitro measurement system to obtain the interface
pressure exerted by the compression bandage on a mannequin surface under
dynamic state. The change in circumference of leg during muscle movement
is simulated using an artificial leg-segment model comprising of an air
bladder fixed over a mannequin part. The dynamic behaviors of bandages
under different conditions are analyzed through this model. The impact of
the major factors namely – bandage extensibility, applied force and change
in circumference of the mannequin leg on the interface pressure during one
cycle of expansion or contraction of air bladder have been analyzed. The
interaction effects of these main factors on the interface pressure are also
identified.
Figure 5.1 Schematic diagram of the leg-segment prototype used for dynamic analysis
Figure 5.1 shows the schematic diagram of the prototype used for
obtaining the interface pressure exerted by the bandage under dynamic
conditions. An air bladder was made and wrapped around the wooden
mannequin limb of having similar circumference at B1 level of the
volunteer reported in the literature. The circumference value at B1
level varies from person to person and hence many sub-sections of the
mannequin having different circumference values were made. For a
simpler model and also for fixing air bladder properly to each of the
sub-sections of the mannequin, a round shape for each of the sub-section
of the mannequin was taken to obtain desired circumference level. For
the bladder to be placed on the mannequin, it was first glued at the end
with rubber adhesive to form an endless air tube and then fixed at the
round shaped profile that was created on the mannequin surface. The
expansion or contraction of the air bladder was done using a cylinder
piston system. The reciprocating movement of the piston was given using
a motor assembly which rotates at a constant speed. This reciprocating
movement of the piston withdraws or pumps air into the air bladder, which
causes the contraction or expansion of the air bladder, hence simulating
the calf muscle contraction or expansion during exercising. The amount
of the circumferential change of the mannequin surface was controlled
by changing the relative position of the piston inside the cylinder
which controls the amount of air pumped or withdrawn into or from the
bladder respectively and, hence controlling expansion or contraction of
the bladder. Figure 5.2 shows the experimental set-up for the interface
pressure measurement under dynamic case.
78 Science of compression bandage
Figure 5.2 Experimental set-up for measuring interface pressure under dynamic state
final total pressure reading (PTo), the resting interface pressure (RP) exerted by
the bandage is obtained. The resting interface pressure (RP) is defined as the
initial interface pressure applied by the bandage upon application without any
dynamic movement given to the air bladder.
After positioning of the bandage on the air bladder, the bladder was made
to expand or contract using cylinder-piston arrangement as discussed above.
The air pressure inside the bladder was recorded over one cycle of the piston
movement by real time measurement. The interface pressure in one cycle can
be obtained in the similar way by deducting the air pressure Pi(t) (without
bandage on the bladder) from the final pressure reading PT(t) (with bandage
on the bladder). Figure 5.3 explains the method of obtaining the interface
pressure from the air pressure measured during one cycle.
Figure 5.3 A typical diagram to obtain interface pressure during one cycle of bladder
expansion or contraction from the air pressure measurement
Short-
Woven 75 25 0.5 40 25 191 18 31 45
stretch
Medium-
Woven 100 – 0.86 56 35 345 19 28 95
stretch
Long-
Woven 100 – 1.36 60 68 521 18 26 145
stertch
5.2.5 Statistics
A complete factorial design was prepared to obtain the additional interface
pressure at all combinations of levels of the factors. An N-way ANOVA for a
fixed effect model was performed to determine the factors or the combination of
the factors which were significantly affecting the additional interface pressure
during cycle. A p-value less than 0.05 was considered as statistically significant.
the bandages at higher extension level. The initial length of each specimen
for tensile testing was 10 cm and the width of the specimen was 5 cm.
The specimens were extended to different levels of strain at a fixed-rate of
extension (100 mm/min).
The tensile tests helped to characterize the elastic property of the bandage.
Figure 5.4 shows increasing instantaneous modulus with increasing strain for
all the bandages. The instantaneous tensile modulus at a particular stress was
highest for the short-stretch bandage and lowest for the long-stretch bandage.
Also, it was observed that at higher strain level the value of the instantaneous
modulus was higher for all the bandages. This shows the distensible property
of the bandage at higher strain level and, hence more force is required for the
further extension in the bandage.
i = − 1, 0,1
+ εijk j = − 1, 0,1
k = − 1, +1
where μ is the overall mean effect, BEi is the effect of the ith level of factor BE
(Bandage extensibility), AFj is the effect of the jth level of factor AF (Applied
force), CCk is the effect of the kth level of factor CC (Change in circumference
of the mannequin); (BE×AF)ij, (BE×CC)ik and (CC×AF)jk are the effects of
the interaction between BE and AF, BE and CC, and AF and CC respectively;
Eijk is the random error component. The null hypotheses about main and
interaction effects are H0: BEi = AFj = CCk = 0 and H0: (BE×AF)ij = (BE×CC)
ik
= (CC×AF)jk = 0, respectively. The null hypothesis is rejected if the p-value
is less than 0.05 and the effects are considered as statistically significant.
Table 5.2 Additional interface pressure (kPa) obtained under dynamic state.
0.5 cm 1 cm 1.5 cm
Bandage
type
Applied force Applied force Applied force
3N 6N 3N 6N 3N 6N
Short-stretch 1.0 (0.05) 1.1 (0.06) 1.6 (0.08) 2.1 (0.11) 2.7 (0.12) 3.4 (0.14)
Medium-stretch 0.7 (0.04) 0.9 (0.05) 0.8 (0.04) 1.1 (0.05) 1.2 (0.07) 2.0 (0.12)
Long-stretch 0.4 (0.02) 0.6 (0.03) 0.5 (0.03) 0.8 (0.04) 0.7 (0.04) 1.2 (0.04)
Table 5.3 shows the N-way ANOVA for a fixed effect model to identify
the main and interaction effects of the factors on the additional interface
pressure during one cycle of bladder expansion or contraction. It can be clearly
observed that the main effects (BE, CC and AF) are statistically significant (p
< 0.05). The interaction effects (BE×CC) and (CC×AF) are also statistically
significant at 95% level of confidence.
84 Science of compression bandage
Table 5.3 ANOVA results to check the significant difference in the mean values of the
additional interface pressure at various levels of the factors.
Sum of Degree of
Source Mean square Fcalculated Ftable p_value
square freedom
**BE 38.91 2 19.44 324.74 6.94 0
**CC 28.86 2 14.43 241.07 6.94 0.0001
Total 84.67 17
Note: The factors significant at 95% level of confidence are denoted by. ** (BE – bandage
extensibility; CC – change in circumference of the mannequin; AF – applied force)
can be inferred that the pressure variations due to short-stretch bandage could
be enhanced to a greater extent when applied at higher tension level and also
with increasing circumference because of calf muscle activities. There could
also be detrimental effects of blood flow because of these changes in interface
pressure variations and hence there is a need for utmost caution and clarity for
the bandage application.
5.4 Conclusions
The work in the present chapter involved the analysis of interface pressure
exerted by different compression bandage using a prototype simulating
the behavior of calf-muscle pump. The principle of the prototype involved
the withdrawing or pumping of air in the air bladder using cylinder-piston
arrangement and measuring the air pressure changes on application of
an external pressure. The factors chosen for the study were the bandage
extensibility, the applied force and the change in circumference of the
mannequin leg. The working interface pressure exerted by a short-stretch
bandage was higher than a long-stretch bandage. Also, larger variations in
Compression under dynamic state 87
the interface pressure were obtained with increasing applied force and also
with increasing the amount of circumferential change of the mannequin.
These factors were also interacting with each other and significantly affect
the interface pressure variations under dynamic conditions. The compression
efficiency of the bandage could differ from person to person and also with
changing tension level in the bandage. Therefore, there is a need for a suitable
wrapping protocol to choose ideal range of tension or extension level given
to different class of bandages to obtain their maximum efficiency which is
expected to vary with changing limb size and also with different muscle
activities.
References
1. Vicaretti, M. (2010), Compression therapy for venous disease, Australian
Prescriber 33, 186–190.
2. Blattler, W. and Zimmet, S.E. (2008), Compression therapy in venous
disease, Phlebology 23, 203–205.
3. Felty, C.L. and Rooke, T.W. (2005), Compression therapy for chronic
venous insufficiency, Seminars in Vascular Surgery 18, 36–40.
4. Partsch, B., Mayer, W. and Partsch, H. (1992), Improvement of ambulatory
venous hypertension by narrowing of the femoral vein in congenital
absence of venous valves, Phlebology 7, 101–104.
5. Kecelj-Leskovec, N., Pavlovic, M.D. and Lunder, T. (2008), A short review
of diagnosis and compression therapy of chronic venous insufficiency,
Acta Dermatovenerol Alp Panonica Adriat 17, 17–21.
6. Mosti, G., Mattaliano, V. and Partsch, H. (2008), Influence of different
materials in multicomponent bandages on pressure and stiffness of the
final bandage, Dermatologic Surgery 34, 631–639.
7. Partsch, H. (1984), Improvement in venous pumping in chronic venous
insufficiency by compression is dependent upon pressure and material,
European Journal of Vascular Medicine 13, 58–64.
8. Partsch, H. (2007), Assessing the effectiveness of multilayer inelastic
bandaging, Journal of Lymphoedema 2, 55–61.
9. Partsch, H., Menzinger, G. and Mostbeck, A. (1999), Inelastic leg
compression is more effective to reduce deep venous refluxes that elastic
bandages, Dermatologic Surgery 25, 695–700.
10. Partsch, H. (2005), The static stiffness index (SSI) – a simple method to
assess the elastic property of compression material in vivo, Dermatologic
Surgery 31, 625–630.
88 Science of compression bandage
23. Stolk, R., Wengen, C.P.M. and Neuman, H.A. (2004), A method for
measuring the dynamic behaviour of medical compression hosiery during
walking, Dermatologic Surgery 30, 729–736.
24. Mosti, G., Mattaliano, V., Polignano, R. and Masina, M. (2009),
Compression therapy in the treatment of leg ulcers, Acta Vulnologica 7,
113–135.
25. Das, A., Alagirusamy, R., Goel, D. and Garg, P., (2010), Internal pressure
profiling of medical bandages, Journal of the Textile Institute 101, 481–
487.
26. Kumar, B., Das, A. and Alagirusamy, R. (2012), Analysis of sub-bandage
pressure of compression bandages during exercise, Journal of Tissue
Viabilty 21(4), 115–124.
27. Kumar, B., Das, A. and Alagirusamy, R. (2012), An approach to examine
dynamic behavior of medical compression bandage, Journal of the Textile
Institute DOI:10.1080/00405000.2012.749573.
28. Das, A., Kumar, B., Mittal, T., Singh, M. and Prajapati, S. (2012), Pressure
profiling of medical bandages by a computerized instrument, Indian
Journal of Fibre and Textile Research 37(2), 114–119.
29. Kumar, B., Das, A. and Alagirusamy, R. (2012), Analysis of factors
governing dynamic stiffness index of medical compression bandages,
Biorheology 49, 375–384.