DESIGN OF PUMP WELL FOR COIMBATORE ZONE III & ZONE VII - PART 7 PUMPING STATION

S.No Description Value Unit

INPUT
A Design will be for ultimate rate of pumping
B Ultimate Peak rate of pumping to give velocity >or = 1.2 m/s = 0.030 m3/s
C ID of connecting pipe from grit well to pump well = 0.300 m
D Nominal head loss at inlet / exit of connecting pipe = 0.025 m
E Head loss in connecting pipe = 0.015 m
F Invert level of connecting pipe at grit well = 401.319 m
G d/D in connecting pipe = 0.630
H Number of starts permissible for VSSM pumpsets per hour = 6.000 start
I Effective liquid depth = 1.000 m
J No of pump wells = 1 no
K Submergence required for pump = 0.750 m
OUTPUT
L Pumping cycle time (60mins/H) = 10.000 mins
M Effective storage Capacity required (L*60*B/4.00) = 4.542 m3
M1 Storage Capacity considered = 4.542 m3
N Diameter of pump well (max(M,M1)/(J * I * 0.785))^0.5 = 2.500 m say
O Invert level of connecting pipe at pump well (F-E) = 401.304 m
P MWL interconnecting pipe at pump well (O+(G*C)) = 401.493 m
Q MWL in pump well (O - 0.10m) = 401.204 m
R LWL in pump well (Q-I) = 400.204
S Floor level of pump well (R-K) = 399.454 m
T Peak duty pump to start when WL rises to (Q) = 401.204 m
U Peak /Low duty pump to stop when WL falls to ( R) = 400.204 m
V Detention period at average flow 0.785 x N2 x J x (Q-S)/(DWF Ult.) = 14.18 mins
W Depth of Well = 6.093

1 of 5
 ECONOMICAL DESIGN OF PUMPING MAIN FROM COIMBATORE ZONE III & ZONE VII - PART 7

Sl No DESCRIPTION VALUE Material Diameter Cost in RS

INPUT: DI 150 3,275,773
1 Daily flow for the year 2010 (MLD) 0.65 DI 200 3,093,544
2 Daily flow for the year 2025 (MLD) 0.76 DI 250 3,713,626
3 Daily flow for the year 2040 (MLD) 0.87
Optimisation of Pumping Main
4 Average flow : 2010 - 2025 (MLD) 0.71
5 Average flow : 2025 - 2040 (MLD) 0.82
4,000,000
6 Peak flow : 2025 (MLD) 2.28
7 Peak flow : 2040 (MLD) 2.62
3,500,000
8 Half Peak flow: 2025 (MLD) 1.14
9 Half Peak flow: 2040 (MLD) 1.31
50% Percentage of average daily flow during 2010 - 2025that 3,000,000
10 0.4
will be pumped at peak rate (MLD)
50% Percentage of average daily flow during 2025 - 2040 that

Cost (Rs)
11 0.4
will be pumped at peak rate (MLD) 2,500,000

12 Length of Pumping main in m 900.0

13 Coefficient of friction for pipe CR in Modified HW formula 0.85 2,000,000

14 Specific gravity of liquid 1.01

15 Efficiency of the pumpset (%) 60
1,500,000
16 Cost of pumpset per BHP (Rs.) 17100
17 Peak Pump 2010- 2025 1W + 1S
18 Peak Pump 2025 - 2040 1W + 1S 1,000,000

19 Electrical charges per kilowatt hour in Rs. 4.50

20 Rate of interest for annuity charges 6% 500,000
21 Static Head 6.52
22 No of years from present to intermediate 15.00
0
23 No of years from intermediate to ultimate year 15.00 150 200 250
24 Capitalised cost factor 0.1030
Diameter (mm)
25 Equivalent cost factor 0.4173
26 Diameter of Pipe (mm) / Class of pipe (K 9) 150 200 250
27 Material of the Pipe DI DI DI

Intermediate Ultimate Intermediate Ultimate Intermediate Ultimate

28 Stage
2010 - 2025 2025- 2040 2010 - 2025 2025- 2040 2010 - 2025 2025- 2040

29 Internal Diameter of Pipe in m 0.15 0.15 0.20 0.20 0.25 0.25

30 Length of pumping main in m 900 900 900 900 900 900
31 Cost of Pumping main (in Rs.) per m length 1300 1818 2433
PEAK FLOW CONDITION
Discharge
32 Q Peak in lps 26.41 30.28 26.41 30.28 26.41 30.28
Velocity
33 Peak flow velocity (m/s) 1.50 1.71 0.84 0.96 0.54 0.62
34 Adjust the pump flow to achieve velocity greater or equal to 1.2m/s 26.41 30.28 37.68 37.68 58.88 58.88
35 Peak flow velocity after adjusting the pump flow (m/s) 1.50 1.71 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20
Peak rate pumping
36 Hydraulic gradient (1 in 1000) 17.24 22.08 8.22 8.22 6.30 6.30
37 Frictional loss with allowance for specials(10%) in m 17.07 21.86 8.14 8.14 6.24 6.24
38 Residual Head in m 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
39 Static head in m 6.52 6.52 6.52 6.52 6.52 6.52
40 Station losses in m 1.71 2.19 0.81 0.81 0.62 0.62
41 Total head in m 26.29 31.56 16.47 16.47 14.38 14.38
Break Horse Power (BHP) at 60 % Efficiency
42 Peak rate pump 15.43 21.23 13.79 13.79 18.81 18.81
HALF PEAK FLOW CONDITION
Discharge
43 q Half Peak in lps 13.21 15.14 13.21 15.14 13.21 15.14
Velocity
44 Half Peak flow velocity (m/s) 0.75 0.86 0.42 0.48 0.27 0.31
45 Adjust the pump flow to give velocity greater or equal to 0.6m/s 13.21 15.14 18.84 18.84 29.44 29.44
46 Half Peak flow velocity after adjusting the flow (m/s) 0.75 0.86 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60
Peak rate pumping
47 Hydraulic gradient (1 in 1000) 4.92 6.30 2.34 2.34 1.80 1.80
48 Frictional loss with allowance for specials(10%) in m 4.87 6.23 2.32 2.32 1.78 1.78
49 Residual Head in m 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
50 Static head in m 6.52 6.52 6.52 6.52 6.52 6.52
2 of 5
 ECONOMICAL DESIGN OF PUMPING MAIN FROM COIMBATORE ZONE III & ZONE VII - PART 7

51 Station losses in m 0.49 0.62 0.23 0.23 0.18 0.18

52 Total head in m 12.87 14.37 10.07 10.07 9.47 9.47
Break Horse Power (BHP) at 60 % Efficiency
53 Half Peak rate pump 3.78 4.84 4.22 4.22 6.20 6.20
Average hours of pumping during Int / Ult stage
54 Peak rate pump (Say) 3.72 3.74 2.61 3.01 1.67 1.93
55 Half Peak rate pump 7.43 7.49 5.21 6.02 3.34 3.85
Annual Energy Consumption in KWH / Year
56 Annual energy consumption for Peak rate pumps 15,618 21,649 9,783 11,298 8,543 9,865
57 Annual energy consumption for Half Peak rate pumps 7,646 9,860 5,981 6,908 5,628 6,499
Annual electricity charges at Rs. 4.50 per KWH in Rs.
58 Annual Energy cost for Peak flow pump 70,279 97,421 44,023 50,840 38,442 44,395
59 Annual Energy cost for Half Peak flow pump 34,405 44,369 26,917 31,085 25,325 29,247
60 Total Energy cost 104,684 141,790 70,940 81,925 63,767 73,641
61 Capitalised cost in Rs. 1,016,717 1,377,104 688,983 795,673 619,321 715,224
62 Equivalent cost in 2010 1,016,717 574,617 688,983 332,006 619,321 298,438
63 Total Capitalised cost in RS. 1,591,334 1,020,989 917,759
64 Pumping main cost 1,170,000 1,636,200 2,189,700
65 Cost of pumps 328,440 445,756 307,885 307,885 427,702 427,702
66 Equivalent Cost in 2010 328,440 185,998 307,885 128,469 427,702 178,465
67 Total Capitalised cost in RS. 514,439 436,354 606,167
68 Grand Total of cost in Rs. 3,275,773 3,093,544 3,713,626
Conclusion :Using 200 mm DI K-9 pipe will be Optimal / economical when compared with 150mm & 250mm DI K-9 pipe and hence it is adopted

3 of 5
 DESIGN OF PUMP FOR COIMBATORE ZONE III & ZONE VII - PART 7

S.No Description Value Unit

1 Peak inflow to SPS = 26.41 lps

2 Low rate inflow to SPS = 13.21 lps
Coefficient of friction for pipe "CR" in Modified HW formula for DI
3 = 0.85
pipes cement mortar lined
4 Specific gravity of sewage = 1.01 say
5 Length of Pumping Main = 900.00 m
6 Diameter of Pumping main = 0.200 m
Intermediate Period (2010 - 2025)
Peak Duty Pump 1 x 37.68 1W + 1S
7 Discharge to achieve velocity of 1.2 m/s = 37.68 lps
8 Slope required = 8.22 per 1000 m
9 Discharge Level = 406.72
10 Static Head (Discharge level - Pump well LWL) = 6.52 m
11 Frictional Losses including 10 % extra for specials etc = 8.14 m
12 Residual head+Station losses = 1.81 m (say)
13 Total Pumping head when pump well is at LWL = 17.00 m
14 Efficiency of Pump = 60 %
15 Pump motor rating = 14 BHP
Low Duty Pump
16 Discharge to achieve velocity of 0.6 m/s = 18.84 lps
17 Slope required = 2.34 per 1000 m
18 Discharge Level = 406.72
19 Static Head (Discharge level - Pump well LWL) = 6.52 m
20 Frictional Losses including 10 % extra for specials etc = 2.32 m
21 Residual Head+Station losses = 1.232 m (say)
22 Total Pumping head when pump well is at LWL = 11.00 m
23 Efficiency of Pump = 60 %
24 Pump motor rating = 5 BHP
Ultimate Period (2025-2040)
Peak Duty Pump 1 x 37.68 1W + 1S
25 Discharge to achieve velocity of 1.2 m/s = 37.68 lps
26 Slope required = 8.22 per 1000 m
27 Discharge Level = 406.72
28 Static Head (Discharge level - Pump well LWL) = 6.52 m
29 Frictional Losses including 10 % extra for specials etc = 8.14 m
30 Residual Head+Station losses = 1.814 m (say)
31 Total Pumping head when pump well is at LWL = 17.00 m
32 Efficiency of Pump = 60 %
33 Pump motor rating = 14 BHP
Low Duty Pump
34 Discharge to achieve velocity of 0.6 m/s = 18.84 lps
35 Slope required = 2.34 per 1000 m
36 Discharge Level as = 406.72
37 Static Head (Discharge level - Pump well LWL) = 6.52 m
38 Frictional Losses including 10 % extra for specials etc = 2.3 m
39 Residual Head+Station losses = 1.232 m (say)
40 Total Pumping head when pump well is at LWL = 11.00 m
Pumping head when pump well is at MWL is not materially different.
41
Hence ignored.

4 of 5
 DESIGN OF PUMP FOR COIMBATORE ZONE III & ZONE VII - PART 7
42 Efficiency of Pump = 60 %
43 Pump motor rating = 5 BHP

5 of 5