Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CONTRACTOR
NAME
RAMS Studies
12/2019
Hanoi 18/12/2019
Doc N° DLM-IMP-PPG-ZSO-J00-00030-E-1ADLM-
Page 2/38
IMP-PPG-ZSO-J00-00030-E-1A
Hanoi Pilot Light Metro Project Preliminary Hazard Analysis
Revision
1A Name Date Signature
N°:
Table of contents
Doc N° DLM-IMP-PPG-ZSO-J00-00030-E-1A Page 3/38
Hanoi Pilot Light Metro Project Preliminary Hazard Analysis
1. INTRODUCTION..........................................................................................................................................7
1.1 PURPOSE...................................................................................................................................................7
1.2 SAFETY POLICY........................................................................................................................................7
1.3 PROJECT DESCRIPTION.............................................................................................................................7
1.4 SCOPE OF WORKS....................................................................................................................................8
2. ORGANISATION & RESPONSIBILITIES...............................................................................................9
2.1 SAFETY ORGANISATION STRUCTURE.......................................................................................................9
2.2 ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES.................................................................................................................9
3. HAZARD ANALYSIS...................................................................................................................................9
3.1 PRELIMINARY HAZARD IDENTIFICATION.................................................................................................9
3.2 IDENTIIFICATION OF MITIGATIONS........................................................................................................10
3.3 IDENTIFICATION OF THE CAUSE/CONSEQUENCE OF HAZARDS..............................................................10
4. RISK ASSESSMENT CRITERIA..............................................................................................................10
4.1 FREQUENCY OF OCCURRENCE OF HAZARDS..........................................................................................10
4.2 SEVERITY OF HAZARDS.........................................................................................................................11
4.3 RISK ASSESSMENT MATRIX...................................................................................................................11
4.4 RISK MITIGATION STRATEGY................................................................................................................12
4.5 REVIEW ON THE HAZARD IDENTIIFACTION AND RISK ASSESSMENT.....................................................13
5. PRELIMINARY HAZARD ANALYSIS RESULTS................................................................................13
5.1 PHA FORMAT........................................................................................................................................13
5.2 HAZARD STATUS....................................................................................................................................14
6. HAZARD SUMMARY................................................................................................................................15
6.1.1 Hazards.........................................................................................................................................15
6.1.2 Risk Ranking.................................................................................................................................15
6.1.3 Severity Ranking...........................................................................................................................15
7. CONCLUSION..............................................................................................................................................16
8. APPENDICES...............................................................................................................................................17
Abbreviations
Definitions
TERMS DEFINITION
Term used within this document Definition as described in project references
Contract Documents
Standards
Project References
1. INTRODUCTION
1.1 PURPOSE
The purpose of the current document is to perform a Preliminary Hazard Analysis (PHA) for the CP01
scope of work based on the overall PHA performed by the Engineer (Systra) to ensure the proper
mitigations of any identified hazards when establishing the system requirements at Technical Design
stage.
This PHA is the starting point of the Safety Process to be put in place during the project life cycle to
achieve the demonstration of the safety of the system. The PHA will be updated to take into account
any evolution throughout the project.
The current Preliminary Hazard Analysis has been developed in accordance with the system life
cycle model defined in Civil Work Safety Assurance Plan.
The CP01 Contract’s work scope is Viaduct Line at Elevated Section, including the construction of
viaduct structures, which link along the National Road No32, Ho Tung Mau, Xuan Thuy, Cau Giay
and interfaces with underground section at the beginning of Kim Ma Street. The contract shall be
completed and within 30 months from the date of the Commencement Date.
Both metro and structure alignment follow the current and/or planned median road. Viaduct structures
are divided into standard viaducts which cover most of the elevated section and special viaducts where
long or special spans are required to pass over major constraints (2nd Ring Road, 3rd Ring Road,
Nhue River). Other non-typical structure consists in Crossover (metro line requires switches), ramps to
depot and underground sections and Y-bridge (branches off to depot). The overview of the project is
shown in Figure 1.1
Figure 1
HPC is the Owner, being responsible for approving the main works during the project implementation.
Hanoi Metropolitan Railway Management Board (MRB) under HPC is assigned by HPC to be the
Client of the Project
Donors
French Government (DGTPE), French Agency for Development (AFD), Euro Investment
PROJECT MANAGEMENT
HEAD OFFIC ↑
S ITE OFFICE ↓
PROJECT MANAGER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
INDEPENDENT S AFETY AS S ES S OR
PLANNING M ANAGER
3. HAZARD ANALYSIS
The assessment is based on the experience gained on other metro projects but also takes into account
the specificities of the project, indeed earlier experience” is used according to the project specificities
and conditions of use. It is verified, as requested by the CENELEC standards, that reused safety
analysis shall be done only when it is relevant e.g. same environment, condition of use.
A Frequent R1 R1 R1 R2
B Probable R1 R1 R2 R3
C Occasional R1 R2 R2 R3
D Remote R2 R2 R3 R4
E Improbable R3 R3 R4 R4
F Incredible R4 R4 R4 R4
According the level of their acceptability in accordance with Table 4, the risks shall be managed as
follows:
Intolerable risks (R1) are those which have:
These risks need to be discussed in writing and submitted to the Client and or the Safety Authority for
approval of both the risks and the corresponding prevention / mitigation measures.
Hazard Status
New Hazards added to the database but still under review for agreement with the hazard
owner
Open Hazards reviewed and agreed with hazard owner; safety requirements and mitigation
identified but not verified or transferred to the relevant third party
Closed Safety requirements have been verified, and mitigation measures transferred to the
relevant third party. The risk assessment is considered credible and the residual risk as
low as reasonably practicable
Deleted The hazard is no longer relevant to this system, but is retained in the database for
traceability.
Table 6 – Hazard Status
6. HAZARD SUMMARY
6.1.1 Hazards
A PHA workshop was carried out on XX November 2019 and identified a total of 95 hazards
applicable to CP01 scope of work. A list of attendees is included in Appendix A.
Of these hazards, the mitigations allocated to third parties as identified in the Systra PHA, have been
maintained in this analysis for further hazard analysis (i.e. during development of hazard log).
If further analysis identifies any additional mitigations to be implemented by third parties, these will
be exported to the appropriate entities in accordance with PIC hazard transfer process.
Assumption
Mitigations already included in the Systra PHA and allocated to third parties (i.e. systems or O&M)
will be included in their own respective hazard analyses and will not be included as hazard transfer
items by CP01.
A breakdown of the hazards and mitigations assessed during the PHA process is included in Table 7
and Table 8.
7. CONCLUSION
The Preliminary Hazard Analysis has identified a total of 95 hazards relevant to the scope of CP01
scope of works. Further analysis to be conducted during the development of the hazard log will
include the provision of traceability between the identified mitigations and the as-built design.
8. APPENDICES
Note
Where cause shows “See here above” this is taken from Systra PHA and assumes that cause is all causes of a person falling as detailed under hazard scenario
“5 – Fall of a Person” All hazards with this cause description have allocated mitigations for O&M and therefore have not been further analysed in this
document.