Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Name
School Affiliation
Date
2008 PRESIDENTIAL DEBATE 2
From the start of the debate, each speaker used a different way to pass their argument.
McCain was the first to speak, and he begins his argument with an attempt to sway the audience
emotionally. He states, "…Americans are hurting right now, and they are angry…they are
innocent victims of greed and excess….they want this country to go a different direction.” (The
third Presidential Debate, 2008). On the other hand, Obama begins by providing logic for the
economic crisis and goes ahead to outline his plans for reversing the situation.
Fallacies seem to be present at some point in the debate. McCain appears to use informal
fallacy in his argument about the plumber and tax cuts as outlined in Obama’s plan. While
McCain aims to provide a tax solution to small businesses, he seems to base his argument on the
Throughout the debate, it seems that the candidates mostly based their arguments and
claims on reasonable evidence. Both candidates provided background evidence to support their
arguments and used examples of policies they would implement as president. For instance,
Obama provides reasonable evidence of the deficit that they need to deal with. He states that
when President Bush took office, the national debt was at a little over $5 trillion, which doubled
over the past eight years (The third Presidential Debate, 2008).
In my opinion, both candidates did well in using background evidence to support their
argument and persuade the audience. However, Obama appears to be more persuasive in his
arguments. While Obama provided evidence and examples of policies in his plan to revive the
economy, his counterpart McCain was more concerned with breaking down these plans and how
they would hurt the economy further. McCain focused more on the limitations of Obama’s plan
References
YouTube. (2008, 10 15). C-SPAN: Third 2008 Presidential Debate (Full Video) [Video file].