Professional Documents
Culture Documents
REFERENCES
Linked references are available on JSTOR for this article:
https://www.jstor.org/stable/4622210?seq=1&cid=pdf-
reference#references_tab_contents
You may need to log in to JSTOR to access the linked references.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide
range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and
facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
https://about.jstor.org/terms
The American Society for Aesthetics and Wiley are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize,
preserve and extend access to The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism
Faire l'amour n'est pas moderne, pourtant c'est encore cepher, whose gaze is turned away, his lips pursed,
que j'aime le mieux. and his face flushed red (whether from mere em-
barrassment or other passions). In the chiaroscuro
There's nothing modern about making love, yet it's still
what I like best.
style of the painting, the woman's confident, open,
Francis Picabia
naked posture is bathed in painterly light, while
the philosopher's figure contrastingly shrinks de-
fensively toward the shadows. Not only uninter-
ested in engaging in the pleasurable beauties of
sexual seduction, he also seems, with his averted
On a recent visit to Vienna's opulent Kunsthis-
gaze, resolutely unwilling to face up to the real-
torisches Museum, I unexpectedly encountered ity
a of their attractions-personifying philosophy's
willful, fearful blindness to the aesthetics of erotic
genre painting that expressed, with art's most pow-
erful immediacy, a central theme of this paper. experience, a blindness that the painter van Hon-
The theme is philosophy's persistent pose of re- thorst seems to portray with some critical irony.1
sistance to the seductive aesthetics of sex, and the If the painting reminds us of the familiar an-
painting, The Steadfast Philosopher by Gerrit vancient quarrel between philosophy and the mimetic
Honthorst (1592-1656), depicts the attempted se- arts, it should also recall philosophy's traditional
hostility and neglect regarding erotic arts, ex-
duction of a diligent philosopher by a lovely young
woman with fully exposed breasts (Figure 1). tending back to Socrates's condemnation of sex
The philosopher in the painting is a manly,as "a savage and tyrannical master" and despite
his provocative self-definition as "a master of
moustached figure in the prime of life, seated at
his desk with a pile of books to his right and an
erotics."2 Making a case for the aesthetic poten-
open book directly in front of him. He has appar- tial of lovemaking means confronting the problem
ently been interrupted in the act of writing, since that modern Western philosophy has tended to de-
fine aesthetic experience by contrast to sexual ex-
his right hand holds a feathered-quill pen, while his
left arm is raised forward with its fingers spread in
perience.3 Consider this history in brief summary.
a gesture of "stop," as if to ward off both physically Shaftesbury defined the contemplation of
and symbolically the advances and attractions of
beauty as disinterested and distanced by explicitly
the seductress who stands near the desk and seems contrasting it to sexual feelings aroused by (and in)
to be removing the wrap covering his left shoulderhuman bodies-"a set of eager desires, wishes and
hopes, no way suitable ... to your rational and re-
and tugging gently on the upper sleeve of his shirt.
The woman's blue dress and undergarments hang fined contemplation of beauty." Though "wonder-
about her waist, while under a matching blue cap ful as they are," sexually attractive bodies "inspire
(whose feather corresponds nicely to the philoso-nothing of a studious or contemplative kind. The
pher's quill) her open-mouthed smile and intent more they are viewed, the further they are from
eyes are invitingly directed toward the philoso- satisfying by mere view."4 Kant made this notion
..........
........... ..
........ .. . ..........
........ ..
.. .............
..... .......... .......... ... .... ...
.................. . ... ...
a .'.v:
...... ......
...............
.. .. . .. ...
...........
.............
. .. .... .. .
.............. ..........
.... . . .........
................ ......... . . ..
. .......
... ..... ... ..... ... ..
one of the four major desiderata for a theoryeven ofcommercial sex."9 His provocative claim is
aesthetic experience is explaining the difference
motivated by an equally bold assertion that "the
between such experience and the experience projectof of romantic love is in essence incoherent or
sex and drugs.7 A careful analysis of the concept
impossible" because such love involves conflicting
commitments
of aesthetic experience, however, reveals that the to both consummation and the im-
most crucial features attributed to such experience
possibility of possession, to Platonic idealization
of what is loved and anti-Platonic affirmation that
seem also attributable to certain sexual experi-
ences. If we put aside philosophical prejudice
it isand
a concrete particular, to unique novelty and
recall our most gratifying sexual performances,
the desire for permanence that instead involves
do we not recognize that some such experiences
repetition of consummation with the beloved.
can be truly aesthetic? Many of us, I sincerely Given the alleged impossibility of realizing such
hope, have had experiences of lovemaking thatromantic
are love, de Sousa argues that individuals
rich in beauty, intensity, pleasure, and meaning,
committed to its ideal (and seeking consolation for
that display harmonies of structure and develop-
its perceived impossibility) can seek satisfaction
in and
ing form, and that deeply engage both thought what he calls "the theater of love" that "mixes
feeling, stimulating body, mind, and soul. real sex and aesthetic imagination." In contrast to
If human sexual performance can be signifi-the theatrical traditions of marriage ceremonies
cantly aesthetic, then we can think of the (which
eroticde Sousa claims are essentially opposed to
arts as arts in a truly aesthetic sense rathererotic
thanlove because they highlight social and fam-
simply in the general (nonaesthetic) meaning of
ily relations), "the theatrical ceremonies" he rec-
ommends
the word 'art' as any organized expertise, skill, or are sexual encounters that "consist in
branch of learning. Such a reorientation notstaging
only the erotic gestures of love with a view to
has value in expanding our theoretical perspec-
pleasure and an aesthetic creation or re-creation
tives on aesthetics and erotics while challenging
of the poignancy of love, of the impossibility of
the presumption that art must be distinguished possession and the irreplaceability of time." "Such
from performances in "real life," but it could also
ceremonies," he insists, "require some of the same
enrich, in a most practical and pleasurable way, the of art and of the best kinds of nonerotic
qualities
actual aesthetic experience of our lives by enhanc-
love-integrity, honesty, intense attention, gen-
ing the artistry and appreciation of our erotic ac- imagination, and a capacity to take plea-
erosity,
tivity. This in turn could deepen our appreciation
sure in the pleasure of the other. It can therefore
of the aesthetic potential of other somaticbe prac-
demanding in the sense in which all aesthetic
tices, thus promoting further explorations in the
experiences can be demanding. Nevertheless it can
emerging field of somaesthetics.8 Since our remain
West- primarily an aesthetic experience, a piece
ern intellectual tradition seems to offer veryoflittle
theater, a form of play, because both parties
guidance or encouragement in sexual aesthetics,agreeitto keep the experience of romantic love con-
seems worth exploring the Asian traditions fined
of ars inside a kind of frame isolated from the rest
erotica. of their lives and expectations."
Unfortunately, de Sousa does not adequately
elucidate the dimensions in which such sexual ex-
periences are aesthetic. The required qualities he
mentions clearly refer to qualities demanded of
The erotic arts of ancient China and (especially) the persons engaged in the ceremonies rather than
India form the core of my study, but their distinc- aesthetic qualities of the experience of such cer-
tive character can be brought into sharper focus emonies. His assertion of the aesthetic status of
by examining them against the background of two these sexual engagements seems to rest wholly on
interesting contemporary exceptions to Western their theatrical nature, and their theatrical nature
philosophy's resistance to the aesthetics of sex, seems to rests almost entirely on the idea of some
which I first briefly discuss. One is a short arti- sort of fictionality of simulation and separation
cle by the distinguished Anglo-American analytic from life. The aesthetics of his theater of love is
philosopher Ronald de Sousa, who "argue[s] for constituted by "the self-conscious playing out of
the rehabilitation of certain forms of imaginative an emotion relatively insulated from the rest of
rehearsals of love in 'casual,' 'uncommitted,' or reality." Though such theater is not explicitly and
Unfortunately, as thebyAnanga
Vatsyana, "the beginning
Ranga of sexual union" in-
laments, m
typically neither give volves
their the gentleman
wives receiving his lady love in conte
"plenary an
ment nor do they themselves thoroughly
aesthetically arranged "pleasure room, decorated en
their charms" because "they
with flowers and are
fragrantpurely
with perfumes,"ignora
where
of the erotic arts "and, despising
he and his the
lover are "attended by differe
his friends and
between the several servants."
kinds "He should
of then seat her on his left
women side,
[elabor
with colorful detail in
and the texts
holding her of erotic
hair, and touching theor
also the end and
they regard them only in
knot of her an animal
garment, point
he should gently of v
embrace her
(AR, p. 1). with his right arm.... They may then sing ... and
The artistic training considered essential for play on musical instruments, talk about the arts,
mastering the erotic arts and perfecting sexual and persuade each other to drink" until her loving
performance emphatically includes and highlights feelings and desire for coitus are strongly aroused
those arts Western culture distinctively denotes as (KS, p. 167).
fine arts, though it ranges far wider. In urging that Then, when the other people are dismissed,
both men and women "should study the Kama Su- more intimate foreplay ensues that leads to the
tra and the arts and sciences subordinate thereto," consummation of "congress." The end of coitus,
Vatsyana insists on the study of sixty-four arts from however, does not terminate the sexual perfor-
which the book's erotic artistry draws its skills. mance, which instead continues into postcoital
"Singing, playing on musical instruments, dancing, embraces, massage, sweet refreshments, and en-
union of dancing, singing, and playing instrumen- tertaining conversation, including the gentleman's
tal music, writing and drawing" are the first to be pointing out the different celestial beauties of the
mentioned, but the list also includes other prac- night sky that his lady contemplates, lying "in his
tices central to the Western fine arts tradition, such lap, with her face towards the moon." Only at this
as "picture making," "scenic representation" (or point does Vatsyana demarcate "the end of sexual
"stage playing"), "architecture," "composing po- union" (KS, p. 168). The clear sense of a staged,
ems," and "making figures and images in clay." choreographed structure with a beginning, middle,
Other arts among the sixty-four also clearly have and end in the sexual performance suggests a dra-
aesthetic character-from tattooing, working in matic, stylized mis-en-scene with aesthetic intent.
stained glass, bed and flower arrangement and the The aesthetically designed stage for the erotic
making of artificial flowers, to the fashioning of event is reaffirmed in the Koka Shastra and
jewelry and other ornaments and further to vari- elaborated most fully in the Ananga Ranga,
ous cosmetic and culinary arts (KS, pp. 108-111). whose recommended artistic furnishings include
To regard these diverse arts as contributing to not only musical instruments but "books contain-
ars erotica is not, however, to assert that their high- ing amorous songs" and "illustrations of love-
est purpose is sexual, for the expressed goal of postures" for "gladdening the glance," and "spa-
even the Kama Sutra itself is not merely the sat- cious and beautiful walls" decorated "with pic-
isfaction of erotic or more broadly sensual desire. tures and other objects upon which the eye may
It is rather to deploy and educate one's desires dwell with delight," such aesthetic delights en-
in order to cultivate and refine the mastery of hancing those of sex by quickening our sensory
one's senses so that one can emerge a more com- imagination and pleasures (AR, pp. 96-97).25
plete and effective person. Vatsyana concludes his The staging of the sexual performance does not
book by insisting that it "is not intended to be used confine itself to aesthetic considerations of artfully
merely as an instrument for satisfying our desires" organized space and artistic activities; temporal
but to enable a person "to obtain the mastery over factors also need to be harmonized into the per-
his senses" and thus obtain "success in everything formance. According to the type of woman and the
that he may undertake" (KS, p. 292). day of the (lunar) month, the woman lover will be
Aesthetic arts are not only included in the rec- best aroused in different parts of her body and by
ommended training for Indian erotics; they also different forms of foreplay; in the same way, dif-
contribute significantly to the erotic performance ferent kinds of women will enjoy sex at different
itself. This performance is not limited to the act of times of the day. These different times, days, body
coitus but includes an elaborate aesthetics of fore-
parts, and modes of foreplay (involving differ-
play and postcoital entertainment. As described ent styles of embracing, kissing, biting, scratching,
ders performance
The analogy of sexual those practices replete with to
specialdance,
beauty,
though present in other
vividness, cultures, is especiall
and meaning. Such transfigured prac-
salient in the Indian tradition. Close affinities ex-
tices of the real can in turn inspire art's fictional
ist, for example, between its erotic texts and the figurations.
twenty-fourth chapter of the Bharata Natya Sastra It is therefore not enough to insist that India's
(the classic ancient text on drama, dance, and aes- erotic arts deploy the objects and practices of fine
thetics), which, as one commentator notes, treats art; we must acknowledge that its fine arts recip-
"the practice of harlotry ... as part of the tech- rocally draw on its ars erotica. The positions out-
nique of dance. Not only did the virtuosi of one lined in the Kama Sutra clearly helped inspire the
art practice the other, but judging from sculptural sculptural depictions of sexual union in medieval
representations [often found in holy temples] it Hindu temples, most notably in Konarak, Khaju-
was in the spirit of a dance that ritual [notably raho, Belur, and Halebid, and also in Buddhist cen-
Tantric], and possibly also secular, coition was un- ters, such as Nagarjunikonda, where many statues
dertaken."32 In this cultural context, sexual union of sexual congress "could be identified as sculp-
with its taste of heavenly pleasures and god-like tural versions of Vatsyayana's sutras-sometimes
feelings of radiating fulfillment could be seen both as interpreted by poets."35 His seminal text of ars
as an analogue and an instrument to the higher erotica indeed became the main paradigm for lit-
mystical union with God.33 erary depictions of love (and the characters of
Well beyond the sexually intense framework lovers) in Sanskrit poetry. Its influence was espe-
of Tantrism, Indian tradition regarded the proper cially strong in epics and dramatic works (which
pursuit of erotic arts as divinely inspired and lead- traditionally included also dance and music) and
ing toward religious progress. Vatsyayana insisted extended also to lyrics of love and even some re-
that his Kama Sutra was "composed according to ligious poetry (for example, the Gita Govinda,
the precepts of Holy Writ ... while leading the life which treats of the love of a girl cowherder for
of a religious student and wholly engaged in the the god Krishna as analogical to the human soul's
contemplation of the Deity" (KS, p. 222), and the thirst for the ecstasy of union with the divine). This
Ananga Ranga argues that having carefully stud- central role in literature and sculpture helped the
ied the arts of carnal knowledge and being fulfilled ars erotica further its influence also in other Indian
and refined through their pleasures, a man "as ad- fine arts.36
vancing age cooleth his passions, ... learneth to Unity in variety is among the most prominent
think of his Creator, to study religious subjects, of our traditional definitions of beauty. In Indian
and to acquire divine knowledge" (AR, p. 223). erotic arts, the richness of variety is found not only
The religious significance of the sexual union-- in the diversity of embraces, kisses, scratchings, bit-
whether symbolized in terms of copulating deities ings, strikings, hair fondlings, temporalities, love
(such as Shakti and Shiva) or in the more abstract noises, coital positions (which include oral and
terms of basic gender-related principles (such as anal sex37), and even different ways of moving
Purusha and Prakriti or, in Chinese theory, yin and the penis inside the vagina, but also in the ways
yang)-adds further richness of symbolic mean- these several modes of variety are combined into
ing to the erotic arts and encourages their ritu- an aesthetic unity, achieving, in the words of one
alized aestheticization even in contexts that are commentator, "the creation of an elaborate sexual
not explicitly religious.34 Recognition that such sensation as a positive work of art."38 Sexual per-
aesthetic ritualization can artfully transform the formance is heightened and harmonized by paying
most basic functions of life is a crucial insight careful attention to which elements of these vari-
of Asian culture that could be therapeutic for ous modes fit most successfully together so as to
our dominantly Platonic-Kantian aesthetic tradi- both stimulate and satisfy desire. An entire chap-
tion grounded on the art/reality and aesthetic/ ter of the Kama Sutra, for example, treats of "the
functional dichotomies. Art's transfiguration various
of modes of striking, and of the sounds appro-
the commonplace need not require the production priate to them," which should also appropriately
vary according to whether the man or woman is
of fictional counterparts to the real world, but sim-
ply a more intensified experience and mindfully striking or being struck, and according to the stage
stylized performance of the ordinary practicesof offoreplay or coitus in which the lovers find them-
living (whether having sex or taking tea) that ren-selves (KS, pp. 154-156). Guiding this aesthetic of
a dynamically harmonizing mixture is the fully recog- creating harmony and pleasure through skill
nition that these rules of art are not absolutely
in playing variations on an instrument of beauty
fixed prescriptions, but rather need to be applied
is stated most explicitly in the Ananga Ranga: "all
with a sense also to the varieties of context, you
rang-who read this book shall know how delicious
ing from the contingencies of the individual an instrument is woman, when artfully played
lovers
(their bodily condition, social status, habitual
upon;in-how capable she is of producing the most
clinations, and current feelings) to circumstances
exquisite harmony; of executing the most compli-
of time, place, and culture. "The various modescated variations and of giving the divinest plea-
of enjoyment are not for all times or for allsures"
per- (AR, p. xxiii). One might understandably
sons, but they should only be used at the proper
balk at objectifying woman as an aesthetic instru-
time, and in the proper countries and places" (KS,for man's pleasure, but the sting is somewhat
ment
p. 157). mitigated by Indian eroticism's insistent advocacy
In drawing on so many varieties of sensorial, for- that women reciprocally play on male instruments,
mal, cognitive, cosmic, sociocultural, and ethical and sometimes even play the male by taking on
aspects, the aesthetic variety of Indian ars erotica his actions and coital positions. Here, in the dif-
self-consciously served a variety of purposes. One ferent forms of Purushayita, the wife mounts the
purpose that became increasingly important was prostrate man, effects the penetration, initiates
the sustaining of sexual attraction and sexual love the rhythmic coital movement, and thus "enjoys
between the married couple in order to preserve her husband and thoroughly satisfies herself" (AR,
domestic harmony and through it social stability. p. 126).
"The chief reason for the separation between the Besides the aims of conjugal happiness through
married couple and the cause, which drives the the pleasures of love and the bonds of intimate
husband to the embraces of strange women, and friendship they can create, the aesthetic variety
the wife to the arms of strange men, is the want of of the Indian erotic tradition has broader cogni-
varied pleasures and the monotony which follows tive and ethical aims. Extending well beyond mat-
possession," concludes the Ananga Ranga. "There ters of sexual and sensual pleasure, kama con-
is no doubt about it. Monotony begets satiety, and cerns the whole domain of sensory cognition. Ars
satiety distaste for congress, especially in one or erotica's rich stimulation and sophistication of the
the other; malicious feelings are engendered, the senses, together with its mastery and refinement
husband or the wife yield to temptation, and the of a wide range of complex motor coordinations
other follows being driven by jealousy." From such and bodily postures, cannot help but bring signif-
monotony and discord "result polygamy, adulter- icant cognitive enhancement to both sensory and
ies, abortions, and every manner of vice" that even motor abilities. Its cultivation of perception in-
"drag down the names of deceased ancestors." The cludes an education in recognizing the enduring
book's study of erotic arts is thus dedicated to dispositions but also the changing thoughts and
showing "how the husband, by varying the enjoy- feelings of others, so that the lover can properly
ment of his wife, may live with her as with thirty- respond to them. Considerable attention is paid
two different women, ever varying the enjoyment to discerning the movements and expressions that
of her, and rendering satiety impossible" while indicate a woman's character, erotic accessibility,
also teaching the wife "all manner of useful arts interest, inclinations, changing moods, sexual pas-
and mysteries, by which she may render herself sions, and the means and degrees to which her
pure, beautiful, and pleasing in his eyes" (AR, pp. interests and passions are satisfied. Such percep-
128-129). tual training develops ethical sensitivity to others
If Indian erotic arts strive both to give women and to their diversity (reflected in the complex,
"plenary contentment" and to "thoroughly enjoy multiple classifications of different types of lovers
their charms," such satisfactions are characterized but also of go-betweens and courtesans).39 Con-
in clearly aesthetic terms of the participatory en- versely, ethical self-knowledge and self-discipline
joyment of sensorial harmonies of pleasurable per- are similarly deepened and honed through erotic
ceptions and movements, replete with representa- practices that probe our desires and inhibitions as
tional forms and complex meanings, and carefully they reshape them, while also testing and refining
structured with dramatic self-consciousness and our self-control, through artful, pleasurable mas-
performative stylization. The aesthetic goal of art- tery of our senses and sensuality. As "Kama is the
is necessary," explains Foucault, "because the sexual act has Chinese culture, but nor did it form part of the
in classical
become so easy and available ... that it runs the ancient
risk of sexual handbooks (SL, p. 48).
21. In one document from the Later Han period, we read
quickly becoming boring, so that every effort has to be made
to innovate and create variations that will enhance theof aplea-
Taoist master who "lived to the age of over 150 years by
sure of the act." "This mixture of rules and openness," Fou- the art of having sexual intercourse with women"
practicing
cault concludes, "has the effect of intensifying sexualand rela-
that by such art "one's grey hair will turn black again
tions by introducing a perpetual novelty, a perpetualand new teeth will replace those that have fallen out" (SL,
tension
p. 71).
and a perpetual uncertainty which the simple consummation
22. Another
of the act lacks. The idea is also to make use of every part of passage from the Fang-nei-pu-i that empha-
sizes multiple partners nonetheless makes clear that this
the body as a sexual instrument" (Foucault, "Sexual Choice,
Sexual Act," pp. 149, 151-152). For a critical study multiplicity
of Fou- does not have pleasure as its highest end. "The
cault's somaesthetics of sex as part of his idea of philosophy
method is to copulate on one night with ten different women
as an art of living, see Richard Shusterman, "Somaesthet-
without emitting semen even a single time. This is the essence
ics and Care of the Self: The Case of Foucault," Monist 83 of the Bedchamber. A man must not engage in
of the Art
(2000): 530-551. sexual intercourse merely to satisfy his lust. He must strive
13. Michel Foucault, History of Sexuality (New to control his sexual desire so as to be able to nurture his
York:
Pantheon, 1986), vol. 2, pp. 12, 89-93. vital essence. He must not force his body to sexual extrav-
14. Michel Foucault, History of Sexuality (New agance
York:in order to enjoy carnal pleasure, giving free rein to
Pantheon, 1980), vol. 1, pp. 57-71 [hereafter HS]. his passion. On the contrary, he must think of how the act
15. A version of this interview, "On the Genealogy of
will benefit his health and thus keep himself free from dis-
Ethics: An Overview of Work in Progress," was first ease.
pub-This is the subtle secret of the Art of the Bedchamber."
lished in English in Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism
The text also discusses the method for controlling ejacula-
and Hermeneutics, ed. Herbert Dreyfus and Paul Rabinow
tion and making its energy "ascend and benefit the brain"
(University of Chicago Press, 1983), but I am citing (SL,(and
pp. 193-194). A Sui Dynasty sex handbook, Fang Nei
translating) from the more complete French version Chi,that
offers a health-oriented graduated schedule of ejacu-
was revised by Foucault and published in his Dits et lations Ecrits,according to one's age and strength of constitution,
vol. 2 (Paris: Gallimard, 2001), pp. 1428-1450, quotations on from strongly built fifteen-year-olds who can ejacu-
ranging
p. 1441. In this interview, Foucault acknowledges that the a day to strong men of seventy who may ejaculate
late twice
ancient Greeks and Romans did not really have an elab-
once a month; "weak ones should not ejaculate anymore at
orate ars erotica comparable to that of the Chinese that(see
age" (SL, p. 146). A different Sui Dynasty handbook,
p. 1434). The Ars Amatoria of Master Tung-Hsuan, which also of-
16. R. H. van Gulik, Sexual Life in Ancient China: A fers methods of controlling ejaculation, is less nuanced in
Preliminary Survey of Chinese Sex and Society from ca. 1500 prescriptions of frequency: "only emit semen two or three
B.C. till 1644 A.D. (Leiden: Brill, 2003) [hereafter SL]. times in ten" (SL, p. 132).
17. It is also worth noting that Chinese texts on the erotic 23. See Richard Burton and E E Arbuthnot, trans., The
arts are not a monolithic unity but rather display some va- Kama Sutra of Vatsyayana, including a preface by W. G.
riety in different historical periods and according to the dif- Archer and an introduction by K. M. Panikkar (Unwin: Lon-
ferent dominant philosophical ideologies that inspired their don, 1988), page references will be to this edition [hereafter
authors (for example, the more sexually liberal Taoist ver- KS]. Besides this famous (and controversial) translation, I
sus the more straight-laced Confucian). The classic texts of have consulted two other translations: W. Doniger and S.
Indian ars erotica also display clear differences that reflect Kakar (Oxford University Press, 2003); S. C. Upadya (Cas-
the different mores of different periods. tle Books: New York, 1963). Alex Comfort, ed. and trans.,
18. Foucault's emphasis on the essential esoteric nature The Koka Shastra, with a Preface by W. G. Archer (Stein &
of these arts is also rather misleading. For many periods of Day: New York, 1965) [hereafter KKS]. See also E E Ar-
China's long history, according to van Gulik, the handbooks buthnot and Richard Burton, ed. and trans., Ananga Ranga
of sex, which were frequently illustrated, "circulated widely" (Medical Press: New York, 1964) [hereafter AR]. The dat-
and "were well known and the methods given by them widely ing of the Kama Sutra is particularly uncertain, ranging from
practiced" not only by esoteric specialists but "by the people 300 BCE to 400 CE, while that of the Koka Shastra (whose
in general." The handbooks began to fall into decline in the formal title is Ratirahasya or Secrets of Rati) ranges from
Sung period, and still more in the Ming period with its greater the eleventh to twelfth century, and Ananga Ranga's from
Confucian prudishness, but the handbooks' practices and the sixteenth to the seventeenth. Besides these primary texts
"principles still pervaded sexual life" (SL, pp. 79, 94, 121, (and the commentary of the editions cited), my research also
192, 228, 268). draws on J. J. Meyer, Sexual Life in Ancient China, 2 vols.
19. See SL, p. 138: "If a man continually changes the (London: Kegan Paul, 2003) and S. C. Banerji, Crime and
woman with whom he copulates the benefit will be great. If Sex in Ancient India (Naya Prokash: Calcutta, 1980).
in one night one can copulate with more than ten women 24. This is especially so with the Ananga Ranga, which,
it is best. If one always copulates with one and the same Archer notes, excludes more than 30 kinds of women as
woman her vital essence will gradually grow weaker and in partners for sexual intercourse, while the Kama Sutra only
the end she will be in no fit condition to give the man benefit. excludes two (KS, pp. 30-31).
Moreover, the woman herself will become emaciated." 25. The Koka Shastra (p. 133) recommends the staging
20. It followed from this logic that male masturbation of the act in a "brightly-lit room filled with flowers[,] incense
was "forbidden (except for extreme occasions) and noctur- ... burning," "lively conversation," and with the gentleman
nal emissions were viewed with concern." As long as it did "singing ... cheerful songs," while Ananga Ranga (pp. 96-
not involve ejaculation, homosexuality was not condemned 97) describes the setting "best fitted for sexual intercourse