Fuzzy Logic Based Power Transformer Differential Protection

Ms. Shitole Smita C. Dr. Korde Pragati.N.

P.G Student, M.E Power System Asso. Professor, Electrical Engineering
GHRIET, Wagholi , Pune, India GHRIET, Wagholi, Pune, India

Abstract——Different issues can happen on the henceforth speedier confinement ought to be given under such
transformer which may bring about detachment of a huge conditions .Different transformer assurance plans are as per
segment of the force framework. The shortcomings on the the following:
transformers are regarded to be risky considering the high  Over current insurance
essential and optional current levels. Numerous strategies
have been concocted to effectively identify the deficiency  Intertwined Protection
on transformer. This paper, be that as it may, presents a
 Differential Current Protection
strategy dependent on Fuzzy rationale. The essential and
optional flows of the transformer structure the  Over Excitation Protection
fundamental parameters of this strategy. The Fuzzy
 Over Voltage Protection
framework so shaped with the end goal of insurance of
transformer utilizes the standard of differential security of
the transformer. The introduced technique has been
effectively checked in MATLAB programming and on
equipment arrangement also.

Keywords- MATLAB, Simulink , Fuzzy Logic

I. INTRODUCTION
A transformer is one of the most significant gadget in
power framework. There are different plans accessible to
secure force transformers [1]. In proposed plot, we are
controlling transfers dependent on over current and
temperature. The transformer is costly and fundamental gear in
power frameworks. Henceforth, transformer security is
significant undertaking. As transformers are utilized in Fig. 1 Differential Protection Scheme
different applications from little circulation transformers to The Fuzzy Logic framework is used to handle data
huge units. As the populace is expanding step by step, thusly imprecision without causing data loss during processing and to
there is increment popular for electrical force frameworks. determine the defect condition more precisely than traditional
With increment sought after force load increments. As over- differential insurance methods [3, 4]. Figure 2 shows a square
burden influences the proficiency and security of transformer. chart.
There is stumbling of the dissemination transformer because of
warm over-burden. To keep transformer from harming, control
against over current stumbling of the transformer is vital [2].

Transformers are utilized in various, sizes and associations

.A force transformer functions as a hub to interface two
distinctive voltage levels. In this manner, progression of its
activity has crucial significance for keep up dependability of its
capacity supply
Transformer Protection Schemes Fig.2 Block diagram for fuzzy logic
The kind of assurance for the transformers relies on the Work to be Done Fuzzification, processing, and
application and the significance of the transformer. defuzzification are the three parts of the approach.
Fundamentally, transformers are ensured against over-burdens
and blames. To diminish the danger of disappointment time of
separation ought to be less for disentangling the inevitable fix.
Any all-encompassing activity of the, for example, over-
burdens and blames can bargain the life of transformer,
 A. Fuzzification
Enrollment capacities are defined as the partitioning of
information sources into distinct extents. The capacity for
enrollment can be trapezoidal, triangular, or Gaussian.
B. Handling
Fuzzy rationale requires rules for handling the
participation works so as to give a yield. The standards are
written so that they look at the two contributions based on
enrollment capacities to give the weighted yield.
C. Defuzzification
The Fuzzy rationale's yield is also fuzzified. With the help of
various strategies such as centroid or singleton, it is
defuzzified to provide a new incentive. Mamdani Fuzzy Logic
Controller employs the centroid approach (FLC). Fig. 4 Fuzzy System
A. Block diagram of simulation modelt
In MATLAB software, a three-phase transformer system
was simulated, as illustrated in Fig. 4. The following are
the ratings for the various components used. 3 phase, 100
VA, 415V/24V, 50 Hz transformer rating; three-phase
supply – 415 V; three-phase load – 55 Watt.

Fig 5 Off duration time Showing Curves on Fuzzy Logic

Fig.4. Block Diagram of the proposed system

With the help of the CTs, the differential current and limiting
current were calculated. The Fuzzy rationale controller was
provided the yield of the limiting present and differential
current estimating frameworks, which gave a new yield of 0
or 1. The FLC's enrollment elements included several scopes
of differential, as well as managing flows. Figures 5, 7, and 9
show typical current, voltage, and temperature waveforms.
The above-mentioned criteria' differential and controlling
flows are surrendered.
Fig 6 Input Output on Fuzzy Logic
 [4] Zhang Liu, Xu Aoran, Liu Li and Zhao Yi, ―Inrush
Current on Transformer Differential Protection Affect the
Analysis and
Discussion,‖ China International Conference on Electricity
Distribution, September 2012.
[5] Madhura S. Deshmukh and V. T. Barhate, ―Transformer
Protection by Distinguishing Inrush and Fault Current with
Harmonic Analysis Using Fuzzy Logic‖, IEEE International
Conference on Intelligent Computing and Control Systems
ICICCS 2017 978-1-5386-2745-7/17/$31.00 ©2017
[6] Wiszniewski A. and Kasztenny B, ―A multi-criteria
differential transformer relay based on fuzzy logic,‖ IEEE
Trans. Power Delivery, vol.10, pp. 1786–1792, Oct. 1995.

Fig. 7 Surface View of input and output

For regular current, the FLC returned a value of 0 or NO
TRIP, and for defect condition, a result of 1 or TRIP.
IV. Conclusion

A Fuzzy rationale based hand-off for power

transformer assurance in a transmission framework has been
structured right now. This configuration was tried on a
genuine transformer framework utilizing genuine information
what's more, MATLAB/SIMULINK programming. It had the
option to distinguish polarizing inrush current, charging
inrush with including load, three-stage to ground deficiency
at stacked transformer, Phase A to ground outside deficiency
at stacked transformer. It has been indicated that deficiencies
could happen in transformer frameworks with all conceivable
blend; consequently, the significance of the Fuzzy enrollment
capacities catching the different mixes. The effortlessness of
this structure dependent on Fuzzy rationale, implies a
considerable decrease in vitality misfortune because of drawn
out and consistent blackouts for the most part brought about
by transformer shortcoming during flaw conditions,
subsequently improving the dependability of influence supply
to clients and furthermore diminish costs related with fixing
harmed transformers, which makes the goal, attainable

REFERENCES
[1] Y. G. Paithankar and S. R. Bhide, ―Fundamentals of
Power System Protection,‖ Prentice – Hall of India Private
Limited,2003.
[2] Myong-Chul Shin,ChuWon Park, and Jong-Hyung Kim,
―Fuzzy logic based Relaying for Large Power Transformer
Protection‖, IEEE transactions on Power Delivery, Vol.18,
No.3, July 2003.
[3] Ahmed Abdulkader Aziz, Prof. Dr. Abduladhem, Dr.
Abbas H. Abbas Abdulkareem Ali, ―Power Transformer
Protection by Using Fuzzy Logic‖, Iraq J. Electrical and
Electronic Engineering Vol.5, No.1, 2009.