Hours of study

Serial no SAT score per day

1 985 5
2 1081 6 Parents often think that t
3 1554 5 will be!!!
4 1105 8
5 872 7 To test this thought, a dat
6 1470 6
respective study hours ar
7 1322 8
Using simple linear regres
8 1346 12 parents are right???
9 926 10 Explain all the relevant co
10 1358 12 (whether they have mean
11 1337 12 Comment about the good
12 1539 6
13 1327 12
14 1000 7
15 1326 9
16 1228 8
17 1140 11
18 1197 10
19 969 9
20 964 7
21 890 8
22 1473 11
23 1120 7
24 1205 6
25 954 7
26 1271 12
27 1016 11
28 1115 7
29 872 7
30 1382 12
31 1430 9
32 1351 11
33 944 9
34 1421 12
35 1285 10
36 1236 6
37 906 6
38 1295 12
39 1066 7
40 923 5
41 1045 6
42 1004 5
43 961 6
44 1055 6
45 1015 12
46 1282 10
47 1152 9
48 1356 6
49 1010 5
50 1138 7
51 1052 12
52 1234 12
53 1133 11
54 1209 8
55 910 5
56 1333 9
57 1555 7
58 1266 10
59 962 7
60 1433 5
61 1331 9
62 1370 11
63 1391 6
64 1499 8
65 1431 12
66 1509 7
67 915 9
68 1302 12
69 1223 6
70 1512 11
71 966 5
72 1045 6
73 1282 10
74 959 11
75 1047 9
76 1062 6
77 1122 12
78 1054 6
79 1532 6
80 1372 10
81 1039 10
82 985 9
83 1156 12
84 1572 9
 85 1232 10
86 979 8
87 1195 7
88 1218 9
89 1263 5
90 1083 5
91 984 8
92 1351 10
93 1361 7
94 1455 10
95 1127 12
96 1070 6
97 1002 10
98 1343 11
99 1292 12
100 1029 7
nts often think that the more we study the higher our scores
be!!!

est this thought, a dataset of 100 student's SAT score and their
ective study hours are collected.

g simple linear regression model, can you conclude whether

nts are right???
ain all the relevant cofficients along with their significance
ether they have meaningful impact on the analysis).
ment about the goodness of fit of your model.
SUMMARY OUTPUT

Regression Statistics
Multiple R 0.0717485938
R Square 0.0051478607
Adjusted R Square -0.005003692
Standard Error 2.3836789669
Observations 100

ANOVA
df SS MS F Significance F
Regression 1 2.8813091174915 2.8813091175 0.507100834 0.47808847260826
Residual 98 556.82869088251 5.6819254172
Total 99 559.71

Coefficients Standard Error t Stat P-value Lower 95%

Intercept 9.8136398344 1.5402868369929 6.3713066934 6.117929E-09 6.75699073573496
SAT score -0.000860359 0.0012081830283 -0.712110128 0.478088473 -0.00325795926918
 Upper 95% Lower 95.0% Upper 95.0%
12.87028893 6.7569907357 12.87028893
0.001537241 -0.0032579593 0.001537241
 Here is the overall model.
y=b0+b1x

Therefore, the Hours of study is : 9.81363-0.00086*SAT score

Intercept= 9.81363
= If your SAT score is 0, you'll need to study for 9.81363 hours.
Slope= -0.00086
=If your SAT score rises by one, the number of hours you study will drop by-0.00086
Hypothesis:
H0: b0=1
H0: b1=1
alpha= 0.05 | If p value is less than alpha, then we reject the null
For intercept,
P value=6.117 is greater than 0.05, therefore we accept the null hypothesis.
Conclusion= We may deduce that the intercept has no influence on the results of this study

For slope,
P value= 0.4780 is greater than 0.05, hence we accept the null hypothesis.
Conclusion= We can deduce that slope has no effect on the outcome of this study.

Goodness of fit:
Significance of f= 0.4780 is greater than 0.05, hence we accept the null hypothesis.
Conclusion= We can deduce that this model is not well suited.
0086*SAT score

9.81363 hours.

pt the null hypothesis.

nce on the results of this study.

pt the null hypothesis.

he outcome of this study.

accept the null hypothesis.

not well suited.