Hours of study

Serial no SAT score per day

1 958 8
2 1019 10 Parents often think that t
3 1477 11 will be!!!
4 1504 11
5 896 8 To test this thought, a dat
6 1138 7
respective study hours ar
7 1485 12
Using simple linear regres
8 996 11 parents are right???
9 1439 6 Explain all the relevant co
10 1185 5 (whether they have mean
11 1341 6 Comment about the good
12 1144 10
13 1373 10
14 864 7
15 967 7
16 1452 7
17 1174 6
18 878 8
19 975 12
20 1275 12
21 1208 8
22 1213 8
23 919 6
24 1446 11
25 1493 12
26 1025 8
27 1381 12
28 1010 6
29 1209 10
30 1284 8
31 1384 11
32 1371 7
33 1005 12
34 1425 10
35 1550 6
36 1102 12
37 945 9
38 1486 6
39 894 9
40 1284 8
41 1217 10
42 1189 12
43 1052 9
44 1230 6
45 1141 7
46 1342 5
47 1037 11
48 1536 12
49 1054 10
50 1312 11
51 969 9
52 1458 5
53 1045 11
54 1236 12
55 1260 9
56 895 5
57 1368 8
58 867 8
59 1571 11
60 1253 8
61 1513 10
62 1482 6
63 1509 9
64 947 9
65 875 10
66 1394 11
67 1382 8
68 1388 11
69 1028 8
70 967 12
71 1063 10
72 1199 6
73 1323 12
74 854 8
75 1513 6
76 979 7
77 1348 8
78 1448 12
79 924 10
80 1295 8
81 1491 8
82 910 7
83 1099 6
84 1421 12
 85 1004 7
86 1442 8
87 1073 7
88 920 9
89 1166 7
90 1217 6
91 1533 5
92 1298 9
93 1299 6
94 1151 7
95 1327 8
96 1029 10
97 1322 10
98 982 10
99 1463 10
100 1163 12
nts often think that the more we study the higher our scores
be!!!

est this thought, a dataset of 100 student's SAT score and their
ective study hours are collected.

g simple linear regression model, can you conclude whether

nts are right???
ain all the relevant cofficients along with their significance
ether they have meaningful impact on the analysis).
ment about the goodness of fit of your model.
SUMMARY OUTPUT

Regression Statistics
Multiple R 0.0717485938
R Square 0.0051478607
Adjusted R Square -0.005003692
Standard Error 2.3836789669
Observations 100

ANOVA
df SS MS F Significance F
Regression 1 2.8813091174915 2.8813091175 0.507100834 0.47808847260826
Residual 98 556.82869088251 5.6819254172
Total 99 559.71

Coefficients Standard Error t Stat P-value Lower 95%

Intercept 9.8136398344 1.5402868369929 6.3713066934 6.117929E-09 6.75699073573496
SAT score -0.000860359 0.0012081830283 -0.712110128 0.478088473 -0.00325795926918
 Upper 95% Lower 95.0% Upper 95.0%
12.87028893 6.7569907357 12.87028893
0.001537241 -0.0032579593 0.001537241
 Here is the overall model.
y=b0+b1x

Therefore, the Hours of study is : 9.81363-0.00086*SAT score

Intercept= 9.81363
= If your SAT score is 0, you'll need to study for 9.81363 hours.
Slope= -0.00086
=If your SAT score rises by one, the number of hours you study will drop by-0.00086
Hypothesis:
H0: b0=1
H0: b1=1
alpha= 0.05 | If p value is less than alpha, then we reject the null
For intercept,
P value=6.117 is greater than 0.05, therefore we accept the null hypothesis.
Conclusion= We may deduce that the intercept has no influence on the results of this study

For slope,
P value= 0.4780 is greater than 0.05, hence we accept the null hypothesis.
Conclusion= We can deduce that slope has no effect on the outcome of this study.

Goodness of fit:
Significance of f= 0.4780 is greater than 0.05, hence we accept the null hypothesis.
Conclusion= We can deduce that this model is not well suited.
0086*SAT score

9.81363 hours.

pt the null hypothesis.

nce on the results of this study.

pt the null hypothesis.

he outcome of this study.

accept the null hypothesis.

not well suited.