You are on page 1of 2

DESIGN OPTION 1

DESIGN OPTION 2

Table

Summary of Enthalpies

Parameter Description Value Unit


h4 Enthalpy after 2nd extraction on IP 3130.714631 KJ/kg
turbine line
h5 Enthalpy after 3rd extraction on IP 2933.059996 KJ/kg
turbine line
h6 Enthalpy after 4th extraction on IP 2703.699831 KJ/kg
turbine line
h7 Enthalpy after 5th extraction on IP 2124.851485 KJ/kg
turbine line
h8 Enthalpy after 6th extraction on IP 178.4014433 KJ/kg
turbine line
h9 Enthalpy after 7th extraction on LP 178.4014433 KJ/kg
turbine line
h10 Enthalpy after entering the 619.5913898 KJ/kg
condenser
h11 Enthalpy after entering condensate 620.51919 KJ/kg
pump
h12 Enthalpy after entering LP1 823.8630977 KJ/kg

h13 Enthalpy entering steam trap of 823.8649542 KJ/kg


LP1
h14 Enthalpy after entering steam trap 1006.450219 KJ/kg
of LP1
h15 Enthalpy after entering LP2 1008.418409 KJ/kg

h16 Enthalpy entering steam trap LP2 1433.538395 KJ/kg

h17 Enthalpy after entering steam trap 1444.766459 KJ/kg


LP2
h18 Enthalpy after entering LP3 KJ/kg
h19 Enthalpy entering steam trap of KJ/kg
LP3
h20 Enthalpy after entering steam trap KJ/kg
of LP3

The table above shows the summary of the values of enthalpies calculated using the values from
REFPROP from MS Excel.
Table

Technical Parameters of Design Option 1

Parameter Description Value Unit


Wt1ideal Isentropic Work of High-Pressure 803.6395744 kW
Turbine
Wt2ideal Isentropic Work of Intermediate 513.0081536 kW
Pressure Turbine
Wt3ideal Isentropic Work of Low-Pressure 199.3234968 kW
Turbine
Wt Total Actual Work of Turbine 720.0863318 kW

Wp1ideal Isentropic Work of Pump of 0.181645047 kW


Condensate Pump
Wp2ideal Isentropic Work of Work Boiler 0.417112491 kW
Feed Pump
Wp Total Actual Work of Pump 13.42442131 kW

Qr Heat Rejected kW
670.2502167

Qa Total Heat Accepted 2892.523077 kW

nth Thermal Efficiency 24.4306404 %

The table shown above displays the calculated technical parameters for Design Option 2
following the requirements specified. The calculated thermal efficiency is 24.43%. The value of
thermal efficiency computed is considered acceptable given the number of feedwaters in the
system.

DESIGN OPTION 3

You might also like