n 20

df 19
mean 3.42
SD 5.9
s^2 34.81
1-alpha 0.95
alpha 0.05
alpha/2 0.025
1-alpha/2 0.975

Mean Variance
t_alpha/2,n-1 2.0930240544 Chisquare_1-alpha/2 32.852327
SE 1.3192801067 Chisquare_alpha/2 8.9065165
ME 2.7612849979 (n-1)*s^2 661.39
UL 6.1812849979 UL 74.259111 UL-sd 8.6173727
LL 0.6587150021 LL 20.132212 LL-sd 4.4868933

Given 95% confidence interval, the average life of batteries will be between 30 hours and 38 hours with
As an analyst, I'll be suggesting that the batteries can be manufactured keeping the upper limit of the ran
en 30 hours and 38 hours with a flucuation between 4 and 10 hours
ng the upper limit of the range as a parameter during manufacturing
x 40
n 280
p 0.1428571429
1-p 0.8571428571
1-alpha 0.9
alpha 0.1 alpha/2 0.05
SE 0.0209121444
Z_alpha/2 -1.64
1.64
ME 0.034

UL 0.177
LL 0.108

Proportion of Filled MBA positions in europe will be between 10% to 18%

 t Test for mean
Hypothesis
Alpha 0.05
H1(Alternative Hypothesis) >55 >55 or <55 <55
H0 (Null hypothesis) 55
n 28
df 27
x 82
SD 28
SE 5.29150262212918
t0 5.10252038562457
p 1.1561977238E-05 2.31239544759E-05 0.999988438022762
for right talied for two tailed For left tailed

REJECT REJECT DO NOT REJECT

If true, reject null hypothesis H0 as the value is in critical region. Hence the value is >H0 which is
If False, do not reject null hypothesis H0 as the value is not in critical regio
If true and the p is nearly equal to alpha, it is better to increase the sample size than rejecting

Chi Square test for variance

Claim sigma^2 784

>sd^2 790

H0 sigma^2 = 790
H1 sigma^2 != 790

Under H0

chi_0 26.7949367088608

LT p value 0.525100184828791
RT p value 0.474899815171209

p value 0.949799630342418
e the value is >H0 which is the alternate hypothesis
alue is not in critical region.
e sample size than rejecting the null hypothesis
Given
UK Mexico UAE Oman
62.1 56.3 55.6 53.11
63.2 59.45 54.22 52.9
55.8 60.02 53.18 53.75
56.9 60 56.12 54.1
61.2 58.75 60.01 59.03
61.18 59.13 53.2 52.35
60.9 53.3 54 52.8
61.12 60.17 55.19 54.95

Anova: Single Factor

SUMMARY
Groups Count Sum Average Variance
UK 8 482.4 60.3 6.5824
Mexico 8 467.12 58.39 5.7849143
UAE 8 441.52 55.19 4.9460857
Oman 8 432.99 54.12375 4.6168554
32

ANOVA
Source of Variation SS df MS F P-value F crit
Between Groups 194.96808 3 64.989361 11.853827 3.445615E-05 2.9466853
Within Groups 153.51179 28 5.4825638

Total 348.47987 31

the value is less than alpha therefore between group varience is high, so null hypo
 q0 3.861
n 32
k 4
n-k 28
min(count) 8
WGV-MS 5.4825638393
T 3.1962935381

LT p value 0.9999655439
RT p value 3.445615E-05

|UK-Mex| 1.91 <T There is no significance difference

|UK-UAE| 5.11 >T There is significance difference
|UK-Oman| 6.17625 >T There is significance difference
|Mex-UAE| 3.2 >T There is significance difference
|Mex-Oman| 4.26625 >T There is significance difference
|UAE-Oman| 1.06625 <T There is no significance difference

up varience is high, so null hypo is rejected