Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research

Duhok Polytechnic University

Directorate of Quality Assurance Curriculum Div.
Duhok Technical Institute

Students Seminar Evaluation Rubrics

Student Name: Department of/pharmacy/Evening Subject/ Medical Microbiology

Excellent Very Good Good Fair Poor NA

COMMUNICATION SKILLS ‫مهارات األتصال‬
‫ممتاز‬ ‫جيد جدا‬ ‫جيد‬ ‫متوسط‬ ‫ضعيف‬ ‫اليصلح‬
Were the slides easy to read & interpret? 5 4 3 2 1 0
1
‫هل الشرائح سهلة القراءة والتفسير؟‬
Did the presentation follow a logical and interesting sequence? 10 8 6 4 2 0
2 ‫هل طريقة العرض منطقية مع تسلسل ممتع؟‬
Did graphics reinforce text and add to the presentation?
3
‫هل الصور والرسوم تدعم النصوص وذات اضافة للعرض؟‬
Was the presentation pace appropriate?
4 ‫هل كان سرعة العرض مقبوله؟‬
Did the student answer questions accurately and concisely?
5 ‫هل أجاب الطالب على األسئلة بصورة صحيحة وبدقة؟‬
KNOWLEDGE BASE ‫أساسيات المعرفة‬
Was appropriate historical context & updated references presented?
1 ‫هل تم عرض الدراسات السابقة المتعلقةوالمصادر بالموضوع بشكل مالئم؟‬

Did the student demonstrate confidence with the subject matter in the Q&A session?
2
‫هل برهن الطالب على الثقة من خالل أالسئلة واألجوبة الخاصة بالموضوع؟‬

RESEARCH METHODS ‫طرق البحث‬

Was the seminar appropriately designed according to guidelines? ‫هل‬

1
‫السمينار صممت بشكل مالئم وحسب التصميم المقرر؟‬

CRITICAL THINKING‫التفكير النقدي‬

 1 Did the student critically evaluate the literature? ‫هل الطالب قيم الدرسات السابقة بشكل نقدي؟‬

Were the conclusions justified by the data presented? ‫هل األستنتاجات مبررة؟‬
2

OVERALL EVALUATION ‫التقييم الكلي‬

Instructor signature
Student Signature

Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research

Duhok Polytechnic University
Directorate of Quality Assurance Curriculum Div.
Duhok Technical Institute

Students Seminar Evaluation Rubrics

Student Name: Department of/ pharmacy/Evening Subject/ Medical Microbiology
 COMMUNICATION SKILLS Excellent Very Good Good Fair Poor NA

1 Were the slides easy to read & interpret?

2 Did the presentation follow a logical and interesting sequence?

3 Did graphics reinforce text and add to the presentation?
4 Was the presentation pace appropriate?
5 Did the student answer questions accurately and concisely?
KNOWLEDGE BASE

6 Was appropriate historical context & updated references presented?

7 Did the student demonstrate confidence with the subject matter in the Q&A session?
RESEARCH METHODS

8 Was the study appropriately designed according to guidelines?

CRITICAL THINKING

9 Did the student critically evaluate the literature?

10 Were the conclusions justified by the data presented?
OVERALL EVALUATION

Instructor signature Student Signature