The document rates student work on a scale from strong (9-10) to weak (2-1-0) across several categories: content, development of ideas, structure, style, and mechanics. For each category, it provides descriptors of the characteristics of work that would receive scores at the different levels of the scale. For example, for content it describes work rated as strong as original and insightful with engaged text analysis, while work rated as weak would show little engagement with the text.
The document rates student work on a scale from strong (9-10) to weak (2-1-0) across several categories: content, development of ideas, structure, style, and mechanics. For each category, it provides descriptors of the characteristics of work that would receive scores at the different levels of the scale. For example, for content it describes work rated as strong as original and insightful with engaged text analysis, while work rated as weak would show little engagement with the text.
The document rates student work on a scale from strong (9-10) to weak (2-1-0) across several categories: content, development of ideas, structure, style, and mechanics. For each category, it provides descriptors of the characteristics of work that would receive scores at the different levels of the scale. For example, for content it describes work rated as strong as original and insightful with engaged text analysis, while work rated as weak would show little engagement with the text.
STRONG (9-10) ABOVE AVERAGE (6-5) BELOW WEAK (2-1-0) GRADE
AVERAGE (8-7) AVERAGE (4-3)
CONTENT Original, Very good and Less perceptive Largely repeats Little to no insightful, often insightful or original; the plot; engagement perceptive engagement some good superficial and with text; engagement with text ideas, but some obvious appears to have with text superficiality or comments read the text generalization very superficially DEVELOPMENT Well-reasoned, Reasoning is Reasoning is Reasoning Reasoning is uses specific good; ideas are adequate, but depends largely faulty, does not OF IDEAS evidence and largely support from on personal rise above “I support for supported but text may be opinion; little liked” or “I did ideas sometimes not faulty or textual support not like” incomplete aspects of text STRUCTURE Structure suits Discussion is Organization Organization Ideas are the discussion; generally clear; needs some needs disorganized logical use of transitions are improvement; considerable and random; transitions present, but transitions may improvement; lack of between and may be be lacking, or ideas are organization within formulaic ideas may be undeveloped poses paragraphs undeveloped and difficulties for disorganized comprehension STYLE Excellent, well- Very good Average Below average Unskilled and expressed University- University-level writing for inarticulate University- level writing writing; errors University; writing; filled level writing. with minor of grammar and errors of with errors No errors of errors of word choice grammar and grammar or grammar interfere word choice word choice and/or word slightly with interfere choice comprehension significantly MECHANICS Format, Minor errors in Frequent minor Major errors or Little to no spelling, format, errors in minor errors in attention paid punctuation, spelling, format, many to mechanics and MLA style punctuation, or spelling, mechanical are all error- MLA style punctuation, or aspects of free MLA style writing
Peter Ferentzy, Nigel E. Turner (Auth.) - The History of Problem Gambling - Temperance, Substance Abuse, Medicine, and Metaphors (2013, Springer) (10.1007 - 978!1!4614-6699-4) - Libgen - Li