Professional Documents
Culture Documents
All rights reserved. This work is copyright to NSW Department of Education and Training.
Permission is given to trainers and teachers to make copies by photocopying or other duplicating processes
for use within their own training organisations, or in a workplace where training is being conducted. This
permission does not extend to the resale of this material to third parties, the making of copies for use outside
the immediate training environment for which they are made, and the use of the materials for hire. Outside
these guidelines, all material is subject to copyright under the Copyright Act. 1968 (Commonwealth) and
permission must be obtained in writing from the NSW Department of Education and Training.
Disclaimer
The views expressed in this work do not necessarily represent the views of the NSW Department of
Education and Training. The NSW Department of Education and Training does not give warranty nor accept
any liability in relation to the content of this work.
This work has been produced initially with the assistance of funding provided by the NSW Department of
Education and Training, Training Development Unit, through the Training Resources & Support Program
with advice from the Product Advisory Committee.
Further copies of this resource are available from: Website: www.skillsonline.net.au
Index of templates..............................................................................................................4
1. Introduction....................................................................................................................6
1. Introduction....................................................................................................................6
Index of templates
Issues Register.................................................................................................................62
Welcome to these materials, developed by the NSW Training Resources and Support
Program (TRS) of the NSW Department of Education and Training to support delivery of
the Diploma of Project Management (BSB51504) from the Business Services Training
Package (BSB01).
These materials should be used in conjunction with the learning guides for the other units
of competency in the qualification and the relevant assessment activities from the
Assessment Guide including holistic and up front assessment activities.
The design of the materials is based on the assumption that project management is not an
entry level qualification and learners are likely to have existing training and
qualifications. This learner guide is aimed at learners who will be working as project
team members in a single project or in one area of a large, complex project.
This is the learning guide that applies to the national unit of competency (BSBPM502A)
Manage project scope from the Diploma of Project Management (BSB41504) and is
designed for use in conjunction with the other relevant components of the Kit. There are
two other units of competency closely related to (BSBPM502A) Manage project scope.
These are:
Section Two contains information and activities arranged around topic areas
that reflect each of the elements in the unit of competency. The activities
include reflective questions, problem solving exercises and activities
involving workplace research. Many of the activities draw on the five case
studies provided with these materials
This unit specifies the outcomes required to determine and control the end products of the
project, and the processes to develop them. It covers project authorisation, developing a
scope management plan, and managing the application of project scope controls.
A full copy of the unit is included in this learning guide – see appendix one.
The information and activities in this Learning Guide aim to assist you to achieve the
following outcomes:
The elements are the critical outcomes for the unit of competency. The three elements in
this unit are:
The unit of competency identifies the required knowledge and skills listed below.
Learning and assessment activities in this guide have been developed to reflect following
areas of required knowledge and understanding listed in the unit of competency:
The need for scoping during project start-up and for ongoing scope
definition during the project
The ability to relate to people from a range of social, cultural and ethnic
backgrounds and physical and mental abilities
project management
problem solving
Project scoping is the framework, or scaffold for the management and implementation of
any project. Project scoping is concerned with mapping a detailed pathway for the
project, from the point at which a project is first considered, through to the final sign off.
Scoping sets a boundary around what the project is about, and, equally importantly, what
the project is not about. In other words, effective scoping ensures that:
the processes to develop products are identified and mapped onto a detailed
pathway for the life of the project.
Project scoping may start well before a project is approved and will continue throughout
the life-cycle of the project. If the project has not been formally authorised, the project
manager will need to organise authorisation as the first step in scoping.
For projects include a tendering process, scoping will commence when the organisation is
considering whether to be involved in a tender, or if a number of potential projects are
The project manager usually performs the project scoping; however, a specialist
consultant or interim manager may be involved in the initial scoping, or the project
manager may lead a team to define and manage the scope of the project. The manager
would normally remain responsible for scoping throughout the life of the project. The
responsibilities include:
In a large project, the manager may need to delegate responsibility for day-to-day scoping
exercises to a member of the project team, who would report regularly to the project
manager.
While general rules and guidelines can apply to project scoping, no two projects are
exactly alike, and you need to be able to adapt procedures to suit the particular
circumstances. In a project with tight timelines and a limited budget, the project manager
and team may need to reduce the effort put into certain stages of scoping. For example in
Case Study 1: the Asia Tsunami Cricket Match, all of the planning and organising for this
major event was done in 15 days. How do you think that this would affect the job of
initial project scoping and scope management? Everything must have been done on the
run, and the success of the event would have relied heavily on team work and cooperation
between a number of organisations.
Because projects seldom proceed according to the original plan, it is very important that
the activities of the team are carefully monitored against the planned project deliverables
and the specified work activities, established at the outset of the project.
This constant monitoring and checking role means that the person in charge of managing
the scope of a project needs to have well developed interpersonal skills and to be able to
relate positively to the wide range of people involved in the project.
ensuring that the project is authorised so that the project receives the
resources and effort necessary for successful implementation
Project scoping is important at all phases of project operations, not just at the start. The
major scoping activities in each phase are outlined below:
1. The proponent phase – that is, before a project proposal is submitted (this is also
called the initiation/concept phase)
During this phase of the project the major activities include identifying the project
objectives and the resources required to achieve them. This part of the project scoping
may be undertaken by a project manager/team other than those for the role of manager for
the project in question. This will depend on the scale of the organisation and the
project(s) for which proposals are submitted. For example, a large building company may
employ a team whose responsibility is to assess the viability of a potential project,
evaluate likely risks, estimate costs and resource requirements and make a
recommendation to project authorities about whether or not to pursue the project.
If a project manager and team have not previously been appointed (for example where a
specialist proponent/concept phase manager and team have been employed), then this will
happen immediately after the project is approved. The first task of the new project
manager is to secure authorisation for the project if this has not been done. If
authorisation has already been finalised, the project manager will need to get copies of
the documentation as the basis for their next task – briefing the project team.
During the approval phase the project manager will consult with the key stakeholders and
ensure that everyone is in agreement about the objectives and deliverables for the project
and carry out the following planning activities:
Identify the constraints and assumptions under which the project will
operate, including timelines, budget and other resources available to the
team.
Scoping functions carried out during this phase include implementing the agreed scope
management procedures and processes and reviewing project progress. As progress is
reviewed, the project manager will also be monitoring changes to the scope of the project
and implementing the agreed change control procedures to ensure that outcomes and
deliverables continue to be met under changed circumstances.
During this phase the project manager will lead the team in conducting a final review of
project processes and evaluating the extent to which the project achieved it objectives and
delivered agreed outcomes/products. The review and evaluation will identify issues,
recommend improvements and pass on documented recommendations to higher project
authorities for application in future projects
Personnel Responsibility
Project manager Leads the project team in defining and managing the scope of the project,
including refining the scope progressively throughout the project,
monitoring scope, identifying ‘scope creep’ and monitoring and reporting
to higher authorities on changes
Authorizing agent/agency Selects and briefs the project manager, authorising the project and
endorsing the scope management plan, receiving and analysing review
reports and meeting with the project manager at agreed critical points
during the project. The authorising agent may also be required to step in,
in the case of a crisis in the project, or in a dispute resolution role.
Project team member(s) Contribute to the scope definition process including the development of
the scope management plan; work as a team under the leadership of the
project manager to apply the project scope controls; participate in project
review and evaluation activities
The customers (both internal and external) who receive the deliverables.
The project sponsor (who provides the money and resources for the project).
The unit you manage is quite small – just yourself as manager, three full time curriculum
specialists/writers and one administrator. The unit designs and publishes learning materials for the School
of Community Services, Justice and Public Safety, of which they are a part, and draws on the services of
consultant instructional designers, editors and graphic artists as required. If the unit takes on a commercial
project, you will negotiate with the head of school to second additional teaching staff from the school and
additional sessional teachers take on the full-time teachers’ classes for the duration of the project. Your
head of school has asked you to review the RFT and to make a recommendation on whether to put
resources into preparing a tender.
In reviewing the RFT you note that the timelines are very tight (only three months to write and produce
400 hours of teaching material). You know that you have the expertise to develop the curriculum and
assume that because the Training Program is one that the unit already delivers that you will be able to
customise some existing materials. You note also that the materials produced by the project will be owned
by the government department and that you will need to carefully document your existing intellectual
property so that the materials already produced by the unit for use in teaching will remain the property of
the college. You realise that you will need to second two teachers for a month each to help prepare the
materials and that you will need the head of school to agree in principle to the secondments.
As you only have one week to write the proposal and will need to put aside some other work for this time,
you decide that you need to talk over the options with the head of school.
As a basis for that meeting you need to prepare a briefing note including details on the following:
1. The outcomes of the project – for the Unit and the School.
3. The resources you will need from the school to complete the project.
Section Four contains a sample proforma for a project overview statement that could form the basis of the
briefing note.
Most projects will need to be approved or authorised for a range of reasons. Even if you
are in sole charge of a project within an organisation, there will be external points of
authorisation – for example, seeking a planning permit for a building or renovation; or
getting local council approval to hold a street party.
In the Case Study 3: Developing a Training Program, the project manager may have
anticipated that she would need additional help to prepare the tender documents as other
project team staff are fully committed at the time. The briefing paper would need to cost
the staff time to balance that cost against the likely benefits to the school if the tender is
won. Once the head of school has signed off on the recommendation to submit a tender,
the project manager is authorised to develop a project proposal that includes the services
of two additional teachers. This process of securing preliminary authorisation also
ensures that the organisation is aware of any risks associated with the project.
Name of organisation
Upfront authorisation
Upfront authorisation is what enables the project to get off the ground. Depending on the
complexity of the project and the resources required, this may be a single page or a quite
detailed document. The following are two different approaches:
1. The supervisor of teller staff at a local bank branch wants to review customer
awareness of the bank’s new electronic banking service by having tellers’ survey
customers when they come in to do their banking. The project will require no additional
resources and will be conducted over a two week period.
2. All that will be required by way of authorisation is a short statement of the outcomes of
the project, a couple of sentences about how it will be conducted, how the outcomes will
be presented and a statement that no additional resources are required.
3. The manager of a TAFE Institute project unit, having won the tender needs to scope
the project to take place over three months. Given the tight timelines the unit manager
proposes that one of the permanent unit staff act as project manager (on higher duties).
She also needs to fully cost backfilling for the seconded staff members for three days per
week, and to budget for the contracted services of two curriculum specialists.
4. The authorisation in this case would include a copy of the contract (that demonstrates
the funding is available) and a detailed project budget that demonstrates that funding will
be sufficient for the anticipated costs.
In the second example above, the upfront project authorisation has been decided before
the project manager is appointed. The project manager’s first task will be to develop a
scope statement for the project, and to provide the unit manager with a work plan that
includes a schedule for authorisation at the critical review points of the project, for
example:
when the Project Steering Committee have approved the curriculum design
when all materials have been completed and the project manager is
recommending handover to the client.
Project authorisation may be in the form of a scope statement. This is a brief document
that provides the person who will authorise the project with a clear summary of:
Examples of different proformas for use in project authorisation are provided in Section
Four of this Learning Guide. Exactly how much detail is included in a scope statement
will depend on the size and complexity of the project and the organisation’s policy and
authorisation procedures.
The checklist in the following Authorisation Checklist table identifies standard items that
may be addressed in a project authorisation process. Use the checklist to compare your
own organisation’s authorisation procedures with these standards.
How does your organisation compare? Are there items that are not addressed? If so find
out why. Are there additional items included in your own authorisation processes? If so
add these items. You can then use this information to customise the project scope
proforma in section 4.1.2 to suit the requirements of your workplace.
Project name and number Used to identify and classify the project
Project manager The person leading the project team who is responsible
for project outcomes
Critical success factors Indicators that the outcome has been achieved
Stakeholders People who have a stake/ interest in the project and can
influence its success
Budget & resources The funding and other resources (including people,
space, equipment) required to achieve project outcomes
on time
Risks, obstacles, assumptions What might go wrong or get in the way; assumptions
on which the specification, budget and timelines are
based on
2. Any assumptions on which a tender bid would be based – e.g. the availability of additional staff members
to develop the materials
3. Any risks (e.g. not being able to meet the deadlines) and strategies for dealing with the risks.
In Section 4.1.3 you will find an authorisation proforma that can be adapted for this task.
Identifying project objectives: these may be the same as the deliverables, but
can also relate to the way the project is conducted, including the
maintenance of good client relations, ensuring safe working conditions for
employees and contractors and addressing contingencies in a timely manner.
Identifying constraints: Constraints are factors that will limit the project
management team’s options. For example, a predefined budget is a
constraint that is highly likely to limit the team’s options regarding scope,
staffing, and schedule. When a project is performed under contract,
contractual provisions will generally be constraints. Another example is a
requirement that the product of the project be socially, economically, and
environmentally sustainable, which will also have an effect on the project’s
scope, staffing, and schedule.
Defining Principle work activities: this is the plan of what the project team
will do to achieve objectives and produce deliverables and the timeline to be
followed.
Scope definition involves working out exactly what is part of the project and, equally
importantly, what is not. An accurate definition of the scope of the project will make the
job of managing scope and scope changes throughout the project easier and reduce the
chances of ‘scope creep’ and misunderstandings between team members and with clients
and stakeholders about the goals of the project. The definition of project scope also forms
the basis for establishing a formal agreement with the client about what the project will
deliver, how it will be undertaken, and when it will deliver on agreed outcomes.
http://www.projectmagazine.com/oct01/scope2.html
Breaking project deliverables into smaller easier to manage components involves two
steps:
Identifying the major components of the work scope. The way these major
components are identified must also be in synch with how the overall project
As an example consider Case Study 2: The major task ahead of Fred, who has just won a
contract to construct a shed are to build a shed in three weeks on a budget of $40,000.
Each of these tasks can be further broken down, for example:
Each of these tasks can be further broken down into manageable components, each of
which can then be aligned to the timeline and the budget.
The WBS is normally shown in the form of a chart, similar to a family tree. Each level
breaking down the scope of the work into more defined components, until the lowest
works package level is reached. Each component of the WBS has its own set of goals and
project objectives which must be achieved in order for the overall project objectives to be
met. A WBS template is located in Section 4 of this learning guide.
Use the table below to format the tasks and sub-tasks. The first set of sub-tasks have been completed as a
guide
FRED’S SHEDS: JOB NO: 129: MR JONES COMMENCEMENT DATE: 4 APRIL 2005
WORK PLAN
The agreement between a project manager and a client may take different forms: it may
be a letter of agreement; a memorandum of understanding; or a formal contract. Whatever
form the agreement takes, there are four basic principles to follow:
1. Make sure the agreement is in writing and signed by the client and the person
responsible for authorising the project or their delegate.
2. Make sure the agreement spells out progress will be monitored and how changes to the
scope of the project will be dealt with.
3. Write the agreement in clear, precise language that can be readily understood by your
client and your project team.
4. Make sure the agreement includes statements on: the project objectives and
deliverables; the constraints and assumptions under which the team will operate; and the
principle work activities and timelines.
The contents of a client agreement will vary according to the type of project. In the case
of IT projects – for example the installation of a new software system on a client’s
network will require detailed technical specifications of the system as part of the
agreement. Because software installations affect business operations and impact on staff
roles projects there will be a number of considerations to be included in the scope
definition and agreed with the client, such as:
http://www.projectperfect.com.au/info_define_the_scope.php
A useful way to organise a client agreement is to use a Scope Definition Checklist. You
might decide to complete the checklist before meeting with your client, and work through
the list with them or perhaps complete the checklist with your client. Alternatively you
The completed sample checklist on the following page identifies the main elements for an
agreement between Gino and Andrea – the co-owners of Makeovers R Us and their
client, Cecile Andrews - see Case Study 4. Gino and Andrea have completed this
checklist as the basis for writing a letter of agreement with Cecile. Once the letter of
agreement is signed and the detailed timelines and work plan has been determined, Gino
and Andrea use their client agreement checklist to establish performance measures and
their scope management plan, including plans for review and evaluation.
What are the project deliverables 1. A costed plan for the new kitchen that specifies: Colour
including products, services and scheme; paint brand and tones; floor coverings; layout; new
other agreed outcomes fittings and fixtures;
What assumptions does the client Cecile assumes that we can deliver on their claim to manage
have? projects ‘on time, on budget, to your specifications;
What assumptions does the project We are working on the assumption that Cecile’s specifications are
team have? an accurate framework for planning the project, but we know that
we will need to carefully detail how we intend to meet each
Are these assumptions compatible specification, so that there is no misunderstanding about the scope
of the project. In case Cecile wishes to add specifications during
the project, we’ll build time and cost contingencies into the
agreement.
What constraints is the project The main constraint is time. We do need to carefully cost all items
operating under? and make sure the quotes we get are firm.
What will the project team be doing The project team will manage all aspects of the renovation,
to deliver agreed products and ensuring that all tradespeople arrive on the appointed day and that
services? fittings and fixtures are delivered on time. We will also phone
Cecile after each stage of the renovation is completed to make
sure she is satisfied
What are the timelines for these We aim to finish in three weeks with agreed over-run only if
activities additional specifications are to be met. Detailed timeline to be
developed once the letter of agreement is signed.
Are the client and the project team in On the basis of discussion to date, yes; The letter of agreement
agreement regarding the project will include attachments detailing the budget, timeline and
activities and timelines? solutions to storage problems (including cat!) and temporary
kitchen facilities. These will be signed by Makeovers R Us and
client.
To develop the breakdown first list all of the project management activities, for example:
Source and price each item to be purchased (Stove, fridge, dishwasher etc)
Once you have allocated each activity to a time line and budget item, ask yourself if the breakdown of
tasks is sufficient to be able to accurately cost the activity and identify time and budget blow-outs
In the case study above, the project team will consist of Gino with assistance from one of
the company’s regular consultant project officers, who will be the daily point of contact,
reporting to Gino. The team briefing in this instance should be relatively straightforward.
On the other hand, in the case of the Asian Tsunami Benefit Cricket Match, briefing the
project team would be a major logistical task, since there would have been a number of
different operational teams, employed by different organisations as well as a coordinating
team convened by Cricket Australia.
Go to Media Centre, and search for media releases in January 2005, and
Go to Major Reports and Publications where you will find the February issue of the Cricket Australia
newsletter that contains a report on the match.
For example, to measure the success of the Tsunami Benefit Cricket Match Cricket
Australia may have established a performance indicators related to the amount of money
raised, the amount of media coverage, the number of organisations that provided services
free of charge and the number attending the match. These indicators and related measures
might be documented as follows:
1. To raise funds for the global Net funds raised after all costs Target of $10, 000,000 net
tsunami relief effort deducted proceeds
2. To raise awareness in the Media coverage during the 14 Coverage in seven capital city
community of the plight of day planning period, broadcast of dailies each day
tsunami victims the match and coverage after the
event Front page coverage of the match
in all dailies
Broadcast on ABC
Depending on the scale of the project, measures can be applied at three stages:
A Project Manager's report to the stakeholder committee and client should always include
reporting against the agreed performance measures for the project. Failure to introduce
performance measures will result in too little feedback for stakeholders to effectively
monitor the project's management and progress.
As the project manager for the renovation of Cecile’s kitchen, Gino, of Makeovers R Us
will determine performance measures and put a review and evaluation plan in place. The
framework for this exercise is already in place in the content contained in the client
checklist, including provision for regular reviews and for evaluation against deliverables.
To ensure that Cecile’s domestic life is Client agreement to proposed Signed agreement
disrupted as little as possible during the plan
renovation. This will include organising All scope changes identified
temporary facilities to make coffee and Definition of scope and managed
heat meals during the renovation, storing
Client feedback during 100% satisfaction with
kitchen fittings where Cecile can access
project arrangements during
those needed during the renovation, and
renovation, measured weekly
making sure the cat doesn’t ‘escape’ or
constitute a hazard for the tradespeople. Zero complaints from
tradespeople re cat’s
intrusion; from Cecile re
Tradesperson and Cecile’s
state of mind
feedback on the cat
A costed plan for the new kitchen that Client agreement to one of Signed agreement
specifies: Colour scheme; paint brand three costed options
and tones; floor coverings; layout; new presented Plan carried out and
fittings and fixtures; reviewed
An agreed timeline for the renovation; Project schedule Timeline monitored and
changes agreed
Client agreement
You may decide to present the plan in tabular form, using the sample layout below.
The Scope Management Plan is a subsidiary element of the overall project plan that
brings together all of the elements involved in project scoping and describes how scope
changes will be evaluated, processed and integrated into the project. The plan includes a
definition of the project scope (or includes other scope documents as attachments) and
details the steps that will be taken to manage scope throughout the project and integrate
changes into the project. A scope management plan should include:
A scope change control system that defines the process to approve and
integrate change into the overall project. This will include the paperwork,
tracking systems, approval levels, and the method of integrating the
approved change into the overall project with a minimum of disruption.
A description of how changes will be managed against the baseline and how
they are integrated into the project.
A plan for reviewing performance during the project and for evaluation on
completion.
Implementing the scope management plan involves regular monitoring of all aspects of
the project scope. Depending on the size and complexity of the project, a project manager
may decide to delegate responsibility for monitoring to a senior member of the project
team who would then report regularly to the project manager on the stability of and
changes to the scope. Implementation of scope management is covered in more detail in
the next section of this learning guide.
Learning outcomes covered in managing the application of project scope controls include
the change control process that is required to assure that the scope implemented
throughout the project, is the scope that was approved at the start or was modified to take
account of agreed changes. The key aspects of this scope change -control process are:
controlling the change request through the review and approval process
This procedure allows changes to approved work products to be proposed and evaluated,
assessed for cost, schedule and quality impact. Once the assessment is complete the
change request may be approved or disapproved in a controlled manner.
an error or omission in the product scope (e.g. the product requirements may
have been incomplete)
the availability of new technologies that offer the opportunity for value
adding.
NO
Identify Evaluate
Review Does it impact
need for YES
request impact
change
plan?
Prepare
Not a change order
good
idea
Issues Register
Change
Amend the NO order
plan approved
Make the
change
YES
http://www.projectmagazine.com/jan02/scope4.html
You record changes to scope in the form of a ‘Change Order’ describing the
change and the impact on budget, schedule and deliverables.
You inform all stakeholders of changes and give them a chance to influence
change if appropriate.
You can not automatically integrate changes into a project. You will need to carefully
evaluate each change in terms of its impact before proceeding:
If a change to scope is necessary you would need to consult with the client
and other stakeholders to reach agreement on how to implement the change.
This may include revising timelines and budget. Where a change has
negative effects – such as extending timelines, increasing costs or reducing
effectiveness of outcomes you should record it in an Issues Register (see
template in Section 4.1)
The change approval process will depend on the scale of the change, the project and its
agreed procedures. Small changes may be approved by the client, larger changes may
require approval by a ‘Change Control Board’.
To date the changes to deadlines has not threatened the success of the project, as you have been able to
negotiate a small extension of time with the client. However, there is a major change looming: The union
that covers ‘Authorised officers’ in the Public Transport System has successfully negotiated a change to
the industrial award that will change the roles and responsibilities of Authorised Officers. This means that
four of the units of competency need to be customised and the curriculum and teaching and support
materials re-written.
The government department are not happy with the changes but agree that they will be made; the project
contact person has asked you to work out how to make the changes in the minimum time and to bring a
proposal to the Project Steering Group for approval. He also asks that you include in the documentation
the details of minor changes made to the scope so far (the four week extension to the timeline, and the
changes to sign off dates, and to make sure that there is a formal authorisation for these changes recorded
on the report form.
You will need to review the changes needed and prepare documentation for the Steering Group. The
Change Order Form in Section 4.1.6 can be used for this purpose.
When significant changes to the scope of a project are negotiated the contract should be
varied to reflect the new agreement. The variation may take the form of a replacement
schedule to the contract; amended text in the contract that is initialled and dated by both
parties, or a letter of variation that lists the changes and is signed by the project manager
and the client. The important thing is to ensure that you inform the client of significant
changes and provide an opportunity to discuss the potential impact of such changes
before they implemented.
Some amount of scope change is natural for a project. No project exists in a vacuum; the
world around it keeps changing. It is common that shifts in the external business
environment result in a valid need to change the project scope. The longer the project, the
more likely this becomes. Scope management techniques will help you handle this
effectively.
Many scope changes are not so natural though, and could be avoided. This insidious
variety of change is not due to the business environment, but to problems with the
original scope definition. By allowing these flaws to exist in the scope definition, you’re
setting yourself up for scope changes down the road and for the project to drift away from
its original purpose, and/or to over-run the original budget and schedule.
Scope creep can be a result of poor change control or lack of proper identification of the
products and features required to bring about the achievement of project objectives in the
first place.
The following indicators that you may have scope creep are drawn from an titled “Self-
inflicted Scope Changes, by Deanna Keahey. The article can be found at:
http://www.projectmagazine.com/jan02/change4.html
1. Unclear purpose If the overall purpose isn’t clearly understood and agreed, there is tremendous room
for future disagreement on the project scope.
2. The scope doesn’t match the objectives. You will not be able to meet the project objectives with
a scope that dose not meet the objectives.
3. There are gaps in definition. Try to make sure you have all areas covered in the scope document..
4. The scope statement contains insufficient detail. It pays to clarify exactly what is
required and be as specific as possible up front.
5. The scope contains hidden assumptions. Uncovering the hidden assumptions can be difficult, but
is possible with persistent, delving questions. Document all known assumptions clearly, including those
you’re making yourself.
6. Undocumented interfaces. Make sure you have every interface defined in the project scope, and all
sources required for data conversion.
7. Items don’t fit. If something in the scope doesn’t make sense to you, then you should question it.
8. Wrong participants/approvers. If there are other people who have a better understanding of what
should be done, a more significant stake in the project, and/or more appropriate authority to make decisions,
get them involved as soon as possible.
9. Silent questions. You see people, especially project sponsors, who just don’t seem convinced. They’re
on the verge of saying something, but don’t come right out with it. They’ll probably bring it up later, so try to
get it out on the table now.
10. Unresolved issues. Make sure you know which are the sharks in the bunch, the ones just waiting to
bite you. Understand your issues well enough to identify those that potentially affect the scope, and try to
address them as early as possible.
Y/N/NA
1. Unclear purpose.
6. Undocumented interfaces.
8. Wrong participants/approvers
9. Silent questions.
From a project manager’s perspective, there are a number of questions that form the
framework for progress review:
Have all scope changes been registered and agreed with team and client?
The point of scope management is not to try to avoid change, but to minimise negative
impact and keep changes under control. The information you need to maintain control
comes from regular reviews of project progress against the initial scope and updated
scope definition.
As has been discussed above, changes to the scope of a project are difficult to avoid: in
particular changes caused by external factors – such as bad weather that affects
construction timelines; increased costs of components; illness or accident, can mean that
project scope needs to be adjusted and issues of time and budget over-run addressed. The
larger and longer a project, the more likely it is that significant changes will take place.
Think about major civic construction projects in your community: you will find that few
have reached completion without having to deal with changes. Projects on the scale of the
Sydney Opera House are usually subject to major changes to timelines and budget, and
perhaps to the design and construction specifications.
Stage I was called for tender on December 5, 1958, and worked commenced on the podium on May 5, 1959
by the firm of Civil & Civic. The government had pushed for work to begin so early because they were afraid
funding, or public opinion, might turn against them. However major structural issues still plagued the design
(most notably the sails, which were still parabolic at the time).
By January 23, 1961, work was running 47 weeks behind, mainly due to unexpected difficulties (wet weather,
unexpected difficulty diverting stormwater, construction beginning before proper engineering drawings had
been prepared, changes of original contract documents). Work on the podium was finally completed on
August 31, 1962.
Stage II, the shells were a originally designed as a series of parabolas, however engineers Ove Arup and
partners had not been able to find an acceptable solution to constructing them. In mid 1961 Utzon handed the
engineers his solution to the problem, the shells all being created as ribs from a sphere of the same radius.
This not only satisfied the engineers, and cut down the project time drastically from what it could have been
(it also allowed the roof tiles to be prefabricated in sheets on the ground, instead of being stuck on
individually in mid-air), but also created the wonderful shapes so instantly recognisable today. Ove Arup and
partners supervised the construction of the shells, estimating on April 6, 1962 that it would be completed
between August 1964, and March 1965. By the end of 1965, the estimated finish for stage II was July 1967.
Stage III, the interiors, started with Utzon moving his entire office to Sydney in February 1963. However,
there was a change of government in 1965, and the new Askin government declared that the project was now
under the jurisdiction of the Ministry of Public Works. In October 1965, Utzon gave the Minister for Public
Works, Davis Hughes, a schedule setting out the completion dates of parts of his work for stage III.
Significantly, Hughes withheld permission for the construction of plywood prototypes for the interiors (Utzon
was at this time working closely with Ralph Symonds, an inventive and progressive manufacturer of
plywood, based in Sydney). This eventually forced Utzon to leave the project on February 28th, 1966. He
said that Hughes'es refusal to pay Utzon any fees and the lack of collaboration caused his resignation, and
later famously described the situation as "Malice in Blunderland". In March 1966, Hughes offered him a
reduced role as 'design architect', under a panel of executive architects, without any supervisory powers over
the House's construction but Utzon rejected this. The cost of the project, even in October of that year, was
still only $22.9 million, less than a quarter of the final cost.
The second stage of construction was still in process when Utzon was forced to resign. His postion was
largely taken over by Peter Hall, who became largely responsible for the interior design. Other persons
appointed that same year to replace Utzon were E.H.Farmer as government architect, D.S.Littlemore and
Lionel Todd.
The four significant changes to the design since Utzon left were:
The cladding to the podium and the paving (the podium was originally not to be clad down to
the water, but left open. Also the paving chosen was different from what Utzon would have
chosen)
Use of the halls (The major hall which was originally to be a multipurpose opera/concert hall,
became solely a concert hall. The minor hall, originally for stage productions only, had the
added function of opera to deal with. Two more theatres were also added. This completely
changed the layout of the interiors, where the stage machinery, already designed and fitted
inside the major hall, was pulled out and largely thrown away)
The interior designs (Utzon's plywood corridor designs, and his acoustic and seating designs
for the interior of both halls, were scrapped completely.)
The opera house was formally completed in 1973, to a bill of $102 million. The original cost estimate in
1957, was £3,500,000 ($7 million). The original completion date set by the government was January 26,
1963.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sydney_Opera_House#Utzon_and_the_construction_of_the_Opera_House
Judgments about the success of the project to build the Sydney House have, of course
changed over time and according to the perspective of the evaluator. As a member of the
public seeing the finished product – now dubbed by some as ‘the eighth wonder of the
world’, there is little doubt that you would judge it as a success – a project that changed
the face of Sydney, and the way other nations regarded Australian culture. As one of the
many project managers, you may well have had a different view, as did the Australian
media, and the NSW government and opposition when the increased costs were being
debated.
The key questions for the project manager in charge of scope management are:
Was there a complete record of actions and decision making so that scope
management could be reviewed and improvements recommended and
implemented.
1 How effective was Fred’s scope change management early in the project when Mr Jones asked
for a larger shed?
2 What might you have done differently? Make recommendations regarding his scope change
management strategy
When the design was submitted for approval, Mr Jones asked if the size of the shed could be increased to
enable him to also store his dinghy. Fred agreed on the spot, subject to a small adjustment to costs. Having
already checked with his suppliers he was confident that he could get the larger size shed frame. While he
was waiting for the permits to come back Fred organised for the surveyor to check the boundaries and also
checked for underground cables in the excavation area.
All went well with the initial planning: the permits arrived; the supplier could provide a larger shed, and
the excavation was completed on time. When the formwork was in place, Fred organised for a Council
inspection, and also booked the concrete truck and organised the shed delivery date, confident that the
council inspection was a formality.
The inspector contacted Fred from the site to check the dimensions of the shed, and on hearing Fred’s
response, queried the specifications for the concrete pour. He said that he did not think there was a
problem, but as the shed was way above the norm in the area, he would have to double-check the
regulations.
Shouldn’t take more than 48 hours to clear and he’d get back to Fred by Friday. But that was the day for
the concrete pour! Fred cursed that he hadn’t double-checked the regulations himself: he was sure that the
additional size was still in the same tolerance zone, but he didn’t have any paperwork to prove it. He’d just
have to fit in with the inspector’s timetable, as he didn’t want to get the inspector off-side, or the site
would never pass the inspection!
A person who demonstrates competence in this unit must be able to provide evidence that
they have taken responsibility for scoping management of projects. This will include
evidence of managing the work of others within the project team with respect to scoping
as a reference for your own further learning and resource to assist others you
may train and mentor.
What an evidence portfolio looks like depends on both the sort of evidence you are
collecting and the purpose for collection.
You might start with a box into which you put any documents, photographs, things you
have made to be sorted out later. You could use a concertina file or a set of document
folders, a ring binder or perhaps (if you are collecting documents in a large format) an art
student folio.
The most common and flexible format for a portfolio is probably the ring binder
containing clear plastic sleeves for holding collected documents and artefacts, as this will
Again this depends on the purpose of the portfolio. When building an evidence portfolio
to apply for formal recognition against nationally endorsed units of competency, such as
the unit you are studying now, then the documentary evidence you collect should be
organised under headings that relate to the elements and performance criteria for the unit
of competency.
Scope management products that could be used as evidence of competency in this unit
include documentation produced in managing project scope such as:
Scope management processes that could be used as evidence of competency in this unit
include descriptions and demonstrations of:
how team members were managed with respect to the scope of the project
how the need for scope changes within projects were identified and
implemented
if you think that you already have some or all of the evidence required as
evidence of competency, the following proforma can be used to record your
work experience relating to project scoping.
3.4.1. On the lines below list and outline any projects in which you have been responsible
for managing the scope of a project.
Identify objectives and outcomes and Any documents to do with upfront scoping
the resources required to achieve these
Ensure that the project is authorised so Project authorisation documentation that may
that the project receives the resources be in the form of a scope statement;
and effort necessary for successful
implementation, including: A descriptions or demonstration that can be
observed by an assessor of how you went
Developing a scope statement for the about securing start-up authorisation,
including details of how you managed the
purposes of securing project
team and the process of briefing the higher
authorisation project authority
Managing processes to secure start-up Project progress reports that have been
submitted to a higher project authority for the
authorisation from a higher project purposes of signing off on milestone
authority authorisation
Define the scope of the project in terms Copies of scope definition documents
of objectives, deliverables, work
activities, constraints and assumptions A descriptions or demonstration that can be
observed by an assessor of how you defined
the scope of a project
Monitor changes to the scope of the Change requests and change orders
project according to change control
procedures within established time, cost Records of control of scope changes
and quality constraints so that project
A descriptions or demonstration that can be
objectives are met
observed by an assessor of how the need for
scope changes within projects were identified
and implemented
Review project progress and record Progress and performance measure reports
results
A descriptions or demonstration that can be
observed by an assessor of how
improvements to scope management were
acted on
Background data:
Problem/opportunity
Project objectives
Project deliverables
Assumptions
Risks
Obstacles
Work breakdown
In completing this activity you will be applying the skills you have developed in preparing documents for
an initial scoping exercise, securing authorisation, undertaking a scope definition exercise, organising a
client agreement, and developing a review and evaluation plan. All of these documents are relevant to the
scope management plan as they address the elements of the project that may need to be adjusted if there
are changes to its scope.
Review the paperwork associated with the project on how changes were registered and approved.
Produce a scope definition document, a scope management plan, and scope change template for the
project?
For the project you have selected, identify the scope management issues encountered and write a report
that tracks the updating of the scope definition against each issue.
Background data:
Problem/opportunity
Project objectives
Project deliverables
Assumptions
Risks
Obstacles
ITEM
Project name and number
Project sponsor
Project manager
Project director
Priority ranking
Problem/opportunity
Deliverable
Key objectives
Stakeholders
Performance reporting
Specification
Time
Escalation management
Contingency
Contractual arrangements
Business value
Approvals
Attachments
Approved by/Date
Work breakdown
2.
3.
What are the project deliverables including products, services and other 1.
agreed outcomes
2.
3.
What will the project team be doing to deliver agreed products and services?
Are the client and the project team in agreement regarding the project
activities and timelines?
Timeline
Budget
Work plan
Client feedback
Classification of change elements Customer originated scope change Internally originated scope change
Changes affecting cost of Project
Required authorization level
Required Documentation
Required Communication
Required Documentation
Required Communication
Required Documentation
Required Communication
Project Manager:
Change Request:
Background information
Impact on Service/Quality
Impact on Schedule:
Impact on Cost?
Authorisation
Lewis, James P. The Project Manager’s Desk Reference Chicago, IL: Probus Publishing,
1993.
Pinto, Jeffrey K., Power & Politics in Project Management Sylva, NC: Project
Management Institute, 1996.
Wysocki, Robert K., Beck, Robert Jr., and Crane, David B. Effective Project
Management: How to Plan, Manage and Deliver Projects on Time and within Budget
New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1995.
http://www.projectconnections.com/community/interviews/index.html
The website also offers a range of tools and templates for download for subscribers
http://www.projectconnections.com/knowhow/template_list/subjects/pm_skills/
planning.html
Action Plan A plan that describes what needs to be done and when it needs to be
completed. Project plans are action plants.
Activity network A diagram that shows the workflow, milestones and task
interrelationships of a project.
Affected groups and Groups and individuals impacted by an action or decision, including
individuals project team members, sponsors, project leadership, sales, operations,
etc.
Assumptions Factors related to a project that affect the environment within which a
project is being implemented and which are taken as being true or
correct for the project to be successful.
Authorised The recorded decision that a deliverable or output has been cleared for
use or action after having satisfied the quality standards for the project.
Baseline Plan The initial approved plan to which deviations will be compared as the
project proceeds.
Change Request Form This form is completed by the Originator for any change to approved
documents, requirements, or deliverables to begin the Project Change
process.
Change Request Log This is a document that tracks and reports on change control activity
throughout the Project and controls the change versions of the requests.
Constraints Factors or things that may impact on a project in some way, usually in
terms of limiting or prescribing its direction or development.
Corrective action Changes made to bring expected future performance of a project into
line with the plan. This should be distinguished from making changes to
the plan in response to new information or changing circumstances.
Deliverables The clearly defined results or goods or services that are produced during
or at the end of a project.
Gantt chart This is a type of timeline that identifies the activity, person responsible
and the period over which it is to be undertaken.
Higher authority A higher authority is a person with the responsibility for making key
decisions about the project and, often, providing necessary written
authorisation or signature.
Implementation Plan Describes how the outputs will be delivered to the customer, including
any special requirements such as stage implementation or ‘roll out’,
training and delivery requirements
IT Needs Request Process of how all requests requiring IT resources are submitted,
reviewed, prioritized and approved/disapproved
Performance indicators Measures that show that a goal or objective has been achieved.
Project manager The project manager is accountable to the project sponsor for the
successful delivery of the project objectives.
Scope The size or extent of a project and what is achieved within the
timeframe.
Stakeholder Any person or agency/s who are affected by, have an interest in, or
could have an impact (positive or negative) on the project.
Work breakdown structure A planning tool which divides and sub-divides the work of a project into
smaller, more manageable work packages.