Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Afrida Alam
Anfisa Rapotina
Experiment 8 Electrolytic water decomposition according to Hoffmann
Contents
Introduction...........................................................................................................................................2
Theory....................................................................................................................................................2
Material.................................................................................................................................................2
Methods.................................................................................................................................................2
Results....................................................................................................................................................4
Discussion..............................................................................................................................................5
Electrolytic water decomposition 8th November 2021 Angela Kafka
Afrida Alam
Anfisa Rapotina
Introduction
The aim of the experiment was to determine Aim the Faraday Constant.
Theory
For this experiment the following formulas were needed:
Formula Explanation
pV =nRT p … pressure [Pa]
V … Volume of gas [m 3 ¿
n … amount of substance [mol]
R … Gas constant (8.341
Pa ¿ m3∗K−1 ¿ mol−1 ¿
T … Temperature [K]
1 I … current [A]
F=I ・ t ・
n t … time [s]
n … amount
I ∗t∗RT Linked with ideal gas law
F= [
pV
As
]
mol
Material
• DC power supply
• Multimeter
• Wattmeter
• Hoffmann’s water decomposition apparatus
• blue and red cables
Methods
To start the experiment, we must set up the instruments and check whether they function well. The
DC power supply is set to 5V, because the multimeter then gives you approximately 10V.
Overall we have to do 4 rounds, each round has a duration of 15minutes. Our method of the
experiment was, one must catch the switching time of the Wattmeter and the Watt, the other
spectator, examines the Volume and the Watt. Both will be written down separately and then
compared and put into an Excel list.
Before we start with round 1, a test round must be carried out, as mentioned above, to check
whether the instruments function well. This test round had duration of 10 minutes and we set the DC
to 5V and the multimeter showed approximately a value of 10V.
Electrolytic water decomposition 8th November 2021 Angela Kafka
Afrida Alam
Anfisa Rapotina
1. Round:
To begin, it must be stated that the Volume of the Cathode and the Anode aren’t equal. The
Anode had a Volume of 10.4ml and the Cathode had a Volume of 10.6 ml. Again we set the DC to
5V and the multimeter showed approximately a value of 10V.We were able to make a side
observation, which was the following: In the Cathode the air bubbles were rising faster and in the
Anode the air bubbles were rising slower. The final Volume of the Cathode was 12.60ml and of
the Anode 12ml, after 15 minutes. The Average of the Power was 0.3 Watts, with the standard
deviation of approximately 0.004. All values are shown in Figure 1.
2. Round:
It must be stated that the Volume of the Cathode and the Anode aren’t equal again. The Anode
had a Volume of 12.1ml and the Cathode had a Volume of 12.8ml. Again, we set the DC to 5V and
the multimeter showed approximately a value of 10V. The final Volume of the Cathode was
15.4ml and of the Anode 13.4ml, after 15 minutes. The Average of the Power was approximately
0.3 Watts, with the standard deviation of approximately 0.003. All values are shown in Figure 2.
3. Round:
For this round we wanted to apply approximately 15V.The DC was set to 7.5V. Our initial Volume
of the Cathode was 10.6ml and the Anode was 10.8ml. The final Volume of the Cathode was
15.8ml and of the Anode 13.2ml, after 15 minutes. The Average of the Power was precisely 0.81
Watts, with the standard deviation of about 0.007. All values are shown in Figure 3.
4. Round:
In this round we applied again about 15V. Here the DC was set to 7.5V. As well as in round 3 our
initial Volume of the Cathode was 10.6ml and the Anode was 10.8ml. The final Volume of the
Cathode was 15ml and of the Anode 13.2ml, after 15 minutes. The Average of the Power was
precisely 0.8 Watts, with the standard deviation of approximately 0.007. All values are shown in
Figure 4.
Results
In Microsoft Excel, we used the formulas listed above to determine our results.
1st round: V [ml] Time [min:sec] Watt 1st round: V [ml] Time [min:sec] Watt
(Cathode) 10.40 15:00 0.30 (Anode) 10.6 15:00 0.30
11.20 9:20 0.30 10.6 9:20 0.30
11.20 8:20 0.30 11 8:20 0.30
11.40 7:38 0.30 11.2 7:38 0.30
11.60 6:58 0.29 11.4 6:58 0.29
12.00 5:51 0.29 11.6 5:51 0.29
12.20 3:52 0.29 11.8 3:52 0.29
12.60 1:07 0.29 12 1:07 0.29
Average: 0.30 Average: 0.30
Standard deviation: 0.003758 Standard deviation: 0.003758
Current [A]: 0.03 Current [A]: 0.03
Discussion
The experiment showed very clearly how important repetition and re-execution are for
measurement accuracy. It is important to have in mind that the setup can also be defect. To
recognise this test rounds are essential.
Another interesting observation was when the glass piston was stuck during the heating process, it
overcomes friction to get back to normal air pressure.
When comparing round 2 with round 3, it has shown that the values are in the same range. After the
big jump, the values for the volume increase always around 2ml per 0.1 °C. This can be seen, if you
compare Figure 2 with Figure 3 in the range between 76.7 °C to 86.7°C and 81.8°C to 86.8°C.