Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2.1 INTRODUCTION
Psychrometrics involves the use of thermodynamics to analyze conditions and
processes involving moist air. A thorough understanding of psychrometrics
is important in the heating, ventilating, air conditioning, and refrigeration
(HVACR) community. Psychrometrics is used not only in assessing and design-
ing heating and cooling processes and ensuring the comfort of building occu-
pants but also in constructing building materials (e.g., insulation and roofing)
and in assessing their stability and fire resistance (Dincer and Rosen, 2013).
Numerous researchers in their related publications and books (e.g., Dincer
et al., 2007; Wepfer et al., 1979; Stecco and Manfrida, 1986; Dincer and
Rosen, 2011; Dincer and Rosen, 2013; Kanoglu et al., 2007; Ratlamwala and
Dincer, 2012) illustrate the application of exergy analysis to a variety of heating,
ventilating, and air conditioning (HVAC) processes.
This chapter describes energy and exergy assessments of the components and
psychrometric processes in HVAC systems and illustrates this material by asses-
sing a novel integrated system for HVACR applications. The basic components
in HVACR systems include heat exchangers, pumps, compressors, throttles,
and turbines, and these are introduced, classified, and thermodynamically
analyzed. This chapter also describes the energy and exergy assessments of psy-
chrometric processes. Mass, energy, entropy, and exergy balances for all com-
ponents and processes are provided.
In this chapter, kinetic and potential energy changes are considered to be neg-
ligible and all processes are assumed to be steady-flow and steady-state. Of
course, transient processes can be assessed if required.
For a proposed integrated system involving psychrometric processes, thermo-
dynamic analyses are performed. The energy and exergy efficiencies for individ-
ual components and the integrated system are calculated and parametric
studies are performed that determine the impact on system performance of
varying dead-state properties and system operating conditions. 43
where U is the overall heat transfer coefficient from fluid to fluid, A is the heat
transfer surface area of the heat exchanger associated with U, and △tm is the log
mean temperature difference (LMTD or △tm).
For a heat exchanger with a constant U, the LMTD can be calculated as
ðT1 T4 Þ ðT2 T3 Þ
Δtm ¼ Cf (2.2)
ln ðT1 T4 Þ=ðT2 T3 Þ
where Cf is a correction factor (less than 1.0) that is applied to heat exchanger
configurations that are not truly counterflow. Figure 2.1 illustrates a temperature
cross, where the outlet temperature of the heating fluid is less than the outlet
temperature of the fluid while heated (T2 < T4). A temperature cross is only
Q_ ¼ mc
_ p ðTin Tout Þ (2.3)
where Cmin is the smaller of the hot and cold fluid capacity rates in W/K.
The actual heat transfer rate can be written as
q ¼ εqmax (2.5)
46 C HA PT E R 2 : Energy and Exergy Assessments
After finding the heat transfer rate q, the exit temperature for constant-density
fluids can be found from
q
jTe Ti j ¼ (2.8)
_ p
mc
The mass, energy, entropy, and exergy rate balance equations can be written for
a closed heat exchanger.
Mass rate balance
For the hot fluid : m_ h, i ¼ m_ h, o ¼ m_ h (2.9)
Q_ c ¼ m_ c ðh4 h4 Þ (2.12)
Q_ h ¼ m_ h ðh2 h1 Þ (2.13)
Note that Q_ c is positive while Q_ h is negative, because the cold fluid gains heat
and the hot fluid loses it. The energy loss rate to the surroundings Q_ surr is
therefore
Q_ surr ¼ Q_ c + Q_ h (2.14)
2.2.3 Efficiencies
Heat exchangers are a significant component in many engineering systems.
However, various methods are used to evaluate their thermodynamic
2.2 Heat Exchangers (Heating/Cooling) 47
efficiencies, and sometimes, these do not reflect the quality of the heat
exchanger from an energy point of view.
For example, Mikheev (1956) suggested that the efficiency of a heat exchanger η
is the fraction q1 of the available heat Qavail from a hot fluid that is used to pro-
vide heat Q1 to a cold one:
m_ 2 ðh3 h4 Þ
η¼ (2.17)
m_ 1 ðh1 h0 Þ
where h0 is the specific enthalpy of the hot fluid at the ambient temperature, ṁ1
and ṁ2 are the mass flow rates of the hot and cold fluids, h1 is the specific
enthalpy of the hot fluid at the inlet to the heat exchanger, and h3 and h4
are the specific enthalpies of the cold fluid at the inlet and outlet.
Andreev and Kostenko (1965) examined the exergy efficiency of a heat
exchanger, defined as the ratio of the exergy changes of cold and hot flows
through the exchanger:
_ 3 Ex
Ex _ 4
ηex ¼ (2.18)
_ 1 Ex
Ex _ 2
where Ėx3 and Ėx4 are the exergy flow rates of the cold fluid and Ėx1 and Ėx2 are
the exergy flow rates of the hot fluid at the inlet and outlet, respectively.
We can express the exergy efficiency using the exergy rate balance:
X
_ out
Ex _ D
Ex _ D
Ex
ηex ¼ X ¼1X ¼1 (2.19)
_
Exin Exin _
m h, i 1 + m
ex _ c, i ex3
T0
Steam from
turbine
1.6 MPa 1 2
250 °C Sat. liquid
4 3
Feedwater
4 MPa
30 °C
FIGURE 2.2 Feedwater heater.
48 C HA PT E R 2 : Energy and Exergy Assessments
• Heat loss from the device to the surroundings is negligible, and thus, heat
transfer from the hot fluid is equal to the heat transfer to the cold fluid.
• The surrounding temperature is at 25 °C.
Table 2.1 Thermodynamic Properties at Each State Point in the Feedwater Heater
State No. P (kPa) T (K) h (kJ/kg) s (kJ/kg K) ex (kJ/kg) m_ (kg/s)
1 1
0.9 0.9
0.8 0.8
hen
hex
0.7 0.7
0.6 0.6
0.5 0.5
hen
hex
0.4 0.4
273 283 293 303 313 323
To (K)
FIGURE 2.3 Effect of ambient temperature on feedwater heater energy and exergy efficiencies.
2.3 Pumps 49
1 1
0.9 0.9
0.8 0.8
hen
hex
0.7 0.7
0.6 0.6
hen
hex
0.5 0.5
373 393 413 433 453 473
T1 (K)
FIGURE 2.4 Effect of inlet steam temperature on feedwater heater energy and exergy efficiencies.
energy efficiency, but that exergy efficiency decreases with increasing ambient tem-
perature. Figure 2.4 shows that energy efficiency also does not change as inlet feed-
water temperature varies and that exergy efficiency decreases with increasing inlet
steam temperature.
2.3 PUMPS
A pump transfers mechanical energy to a fluid by raising its pressure. It is a
device that moves fluids (liquids or gases) by mechanical action. Pumps can
be classified into three major groups according to the method they use to move
the fluid: direct lift, displacement, and gravity.
The mass, energy, entropy, and exergy rate balances for an adiabatic pump can
be written as follows:
Mass balance : m_ in ¼ m_ out (2.20)
m_ in ðhout hin Þ
ηen ¼ (2.24)
W_ in
Note that Q_ loss is the frictional heat loss rate for the pump, which is the differ-
ence between the actual and the reversible work rates.
1 2
Water
100 kPa
30°C
1.35 kg/s 4 MPa
FIGURE 2.5 Pump.
2.4 Compressors 51
1 1
hen hs hex
0.9 0.9
hex, hs
hen
0.8 0.8
0.7 0.7
0.6 0.6
273 280 287 294 301 308 315 322
T0 (K)
FIGURE 2.6 Effect of ambient temperature on pump isentropic, energy, and exergy efficiencies.
1 1
hen hex hs
0.8 0.8
0.7 0.7
0.6 0.6
274 281 288 295 302 309 316 323
T1 (K)
FIGURE 2.7 Effect of inlet temperature on pump isentropic, energy, and exergy efficiencies.
2.4 COMPRESSORS
Compressors are commonly employed. For example, a compressor (Fig. 2.8) is
one of the four main components of the basic vapor compression refrigeration
system (the others are the condenser, the evaporator, and the expander). In that
application, the compressor circulates refrigerant through the system and
52 C HA PT E R 2 : Energy and Exergy Assessments
2.4.1 Efficiencies
Compressor-related efficiencies can be grouped by category. There are multiple
efficiencies because deviations from ideal performance can be evaluated in various
ways, to measure different parameters. Various compressor efficiencies follow:
Volumetric efficiency (ηv) is the ratio of actual volumetric flow to the ideal vol-
umetric flow (i.e., the geometric compressor displacement).
Compression isentropic efficiency (ηs) considers only what occurs within the
compression volume and is a measure of the deviation of actual compression
from isentropic compression. This efficiency is defined as the ratio of work
required for isentropic compression of the gas (ws) to work delivered to the
gas within the compression volume (wa):
2.4 Compressors 53
ws
ηs ¼ (2.30)
wa
Motor efficiency (ηe) is the ratio of work input to the compressor shaft (wm) to
work input to the motor (we):
wm
ηe ¼ (2.33)
we
Total compressor efficiency (ηcomp) is the ratio of work required for isentropic
compression (ws) to actual work input to the motor (we):
ws
ηcomp ¼ (2.34)
we
The energy efficiency of a compressor can be defined as the ratio of the total
energy change of the fluid passing through the compressor to the net input
compressor work:
m_ ðhout hin Þ
ηen ¼ (2.35)
W_ c
The exergy efficiency of a compressor can be expressed as the ratio of the revers-
ible work to the net input compressor work:
W_ rev
ηex ¼ (2.36)
W_ c
600 kPa
167 °C 2
.
Win = 8 kW
Air
100 kPa
1
17 °C
parameters are calculated: (a) the increase in the exergy of the air and (b) the
rate exergy destroyed during this process. The surroundings are assumed to be
at 17 °C.
2.5 FANS
A fan creates a pressure difference and causes flow of a gas, often air. The
impeller does work on the gas, imparting to it both static and kinetic
2.5 Fans 55
0.8 0.8
0.76 0.76
0.72 0.72
hen, hs
hex
0.68 0.68
0.64 0.64
hen hex hs
0.6 0.6
0 10 20 30 40 50
T0 (C)
FIGURE 2.10 Effect of ambient temperature on compressor isentropic, energy, and exergy efficiencies.
1 1
hen
hex
0.9 0.9
hs
0.8 0.8
hen, hs
hex
0.7 0.7
0.6 0.6
0.5 0.5
150 160 170 180 190 200
T2 (C)
FIGURE 2.11 Effect of outlet temperature on compressor isentropic, energy, and exergy efficiencies.
The mass, energy, entropy, and exergy rate balances for a fan are as follows:
Mass balance : m_ in ¼ m_ out (2.37)
2
v
Energy balance : m_ in hin + W_ in ¼ m_ out hout + m_ out exit (2.38)
2
Entropy balance : m_ in sin + S_gen ¼ m_ out sout (2.39)
v2exit
Exergy balance : m_ in exin + W_ in ¼ m_ out exout + Ex
_ d + m_ out (2.40)
2
2.5.1 Efficiencies
The energy (and exergy) efficiency of a fan is the ratio of the kinetic energy flow
rate of the gas at the fan exit to the mechanical power input:
v2exit
ΔE_mech m_ 2
η¼ ¼ (2.41)
W_ in W_ in
The pressure reduction when a fluid passes through the orifice (i.e., small open-
ing) of a throttling valve is due to sudden expansion into a larger space and
frictional effects. A throttling valve is another common component in refriger-
ation, air conditioning, and other systems.
In refrigeration applications, for instance, the refrigerant exiting the compres-
sor at high pressure and temperature passes through the condenser and leaves
at medium temperature and high pressure and passes through a throttling
valve. There, the pressure and the temperature of the refrigerant drop suffi-
ciently so the refrigerant is then able to produce the cooling effect in the evap-
orator of the refrigerator. A similar operation is observed for the cooling coil
of an air conditioner. The throttling valve also controls the amount of the
refrigerant entering the evaporator, which depends on the refrigeration load.
Specifically, the refrigerant flow rate through the throttling valve depends on
cross-sectional area of the orifice and the pressure difference across the
throttling valve.
_ d
Exergy balance : m_ in exin ¼ m_ out exout + Ex (2.45)
1. Capillary tube
2. Constant pressure or automatic throttling valve
3. Thermostatic expansion valve
4. Float valve
58 C HA PT E R 2 : Energy and Exergy Assessments
m_ ðhout Þ
ηen ¼ (2.46)
m_ ðhin Þ
Correspondingly, the exergy efficiency can be defined as the ratio of the useful
exergy output to the total exergy input:
m_ ðexout Þ Exd
ηex ¼ ¼1 (2.47)
m_ ðexin Þ m_ ðexin Þ
For an adiabatic throttling operation, which is often the case, the energy effi-
ciency is often 100%. The exergy efficiency is lower than 100% due to irrevers-
ibilities associated with unconstrained expansion.
1 2
T1 T1 = T2
h1 h1 = h2
FIGURE 2.13 Throttling valve.
2.6 Throttling Valves 59
1 1
hen hex
0.98 0.98
0.96 0.96
hen
hex
0.94 0.94
0.92 0.92
0.9 0.9
273 283 293 303 313 323
T0 (K)
FIGURE 2.14 Effect of ambient temperature on throttling valve energy and exergy efficiencies.
1 1
hen hex
0.96 0.96
0.92 0.92
hen
hex
0.88 0.88
0.84 0.84
0.8 0.8
1000 2000 3000 4000
P1 (kPa)
FIGURE 2.15 Effect of inlet pressure on throttling valve energy and exergy efficiencies.
2.7 TURBINES
A turbine is a device that extracts energy from a pressurized fluid as it expands
and yields mechanical work, often in the form of a rotating shaft. Turbines are
used in many systems for electrical power generation (Fig. 2.16).
In an ideal Rankine cycle, for instance, superheated vapor from a boiler
enters a vapor turbine at high temperature and pressure. The vapor passes
through a nozzle, where some of its pressure is converted into kinetic energy
as the velocity increases. The high velocity vapor enters the turbine and
flows over the turbine blades. A force is created on the blades due to kinetic
energy of the vapor and the expansion of the vapor as it flows over the
blades, causing them to move. An electrical generator or another device
is attached to the shaft. The fluid often exits the turbine as a saturated vapor
at a reduced temperature and pressure and is conveyed to the condenser
where it is cooled.
The mass, energy, entropy, and exergy rate balance equations can be written for
a turbine as follows:
Mass balance : m_ in ¼ m_ out (2.48)
_ d + W_ out
Exergy balance : m_ in exin ¼ m_ out exout + Ex (2.51)
W_ out
ηen ¼ (2.52)
m_ ðhin hout Þ
The isentropic efficiency of a turbine is defined as ratio of the work output from
the turbine to the work output if the process were isentropic:
h1 h2 T1 T2
ηs ¼ ¼ (2.53)
h1 h2s T1 T2s
The exergy efficiency of a compressor can be defined in several ways, one being
the ratio of work output to the reversible work:
W_ out W_ out
ηex ¼ ¼ (2.54)
W_ rev m_ ðexin exout Þ
1. The working fluid, air, behaves like an ideal gas with constant
specific heats.
2. Kinetic and potential energy changes are negligible.
• Sensible cooling
• Sensible heating
1 1
hen hex hs
0.9 0.9
hen, hs
hex
0.8 0.8
0.7 0.7
0.6 0.6
273 283 293 303 313 323
T0 (K)
FIGURE 2.18 Effect of ambient temperature on turbine isentropic, energy, and exergy efficiencies.
2.8 Energy and Exergy Assessments of Psychrometric Processes 63
1 1
hen hex hs
0.9 0.9
hen, hs
hex
0.8 0.8
0.7 0.7
0.6 0.6
430 440 450 460 470
T1 (K)
FIGURE 2.19 Effect of inlet temperature on turbine isentropic, energy, and exergy efficiencies.
FIGURE 2.20 Sensible heating and cooling processes: schematic (left) and representation on
psychrometric chart (right).
The rate balances for various commodities can be written in a general form for
common air conditioning processes (see Fig. 2.20) in which one or more moist
air flows enter and exit. These are given below:
X X
Mass balance f or dry air : m_ a ¼ m_ a (2.55)
in out
X X X X
Mass balance f or water : m_ w ¼ m_ w or m_ a ω ¼ m_ a ω or (2.56)
in out in out
where
m_ w ¼ m_ a ðωout ωin Þ (2.57)
X X
Energy balance : Q_ in + _ ¼ Q_ out +
mh _
mh (2.58)
in out
X Q_ X X Q_ X
or + _
ms _ + S_gen ¼ 0
ms (2.61)
in
T in out
T out
X X X X
Exergy balance : _ _+
Ex _
mex _ _
Ex mex _ dest ¼ 0
_ + Ex (2.62)
Q Q
in in out out
X T0
X X T0
X
or Q_ 1 + _
mex Q_ 1 mex _ dest ¼ 0
_ + Ex (2.63)
in
T in in
T out
When considering dry air and water vapor as an ideal gas, the flow exergy for a
stream can be defined as
T T P
ex ¼ cp, a + ωcp, v T0 1 ln e ÞRa T0 ln
+ ð1 + ω
T0 T0 P0
1+ωe e
ω
e Þ ln
+ Ra T0 ð1 + ω e ln
+ω (2.66)
e
1+ ω e0
ω
1+ωe e
ω
e Þ ln
Note that the last term Ra T0 ð1 + ω e ln
+ω is the specific chem-
e
1+ ω e0
ω
ical exergy. Here,
ω
e ¼ 1:608ω (2.67)
ω ¼ mv =ma (2.68)
For any process or system, the exergy efficiency is defined as the ratio of exergy
of the products to the input exergy as follows:
_ products
Ex _ dest
Ex
ηex ¼ ¼1 (2.69)
_ in
Ex _ in
Ex
Q_
Entropy balance : m_ a1 s1 + S_gen, c ¼ m_ a2 s2 + c (2.73)
Ts
T0
Exergy balance : m_ a1 ex1 ¼ m_ a2 ex2 + Q_ c 1 _ dest, c
+ Ex (2.74)
Ts
_
_ dest, c ¼ T0 S_gen, c ¼ T0 m_ a2 s2 m_ a1 s1 + Qc
Ex (2.75)
Ts
2.9.1 Efficiencies
Various efficiencies can be defined for sensible cooling. Ratlamwala and Dincer
(2012) performed a comprehensive study to investigate all possible efficiency
options for psychrometric processes and comparatively assessed them for some
selected applications. The first defines the efficiency as the ratio of change in
energy/exergy of the air to the energy/exergy input to the system. In this defi-
nition, change in energy/exergy means the difference between the energy/
exergy of the stream entering the system and the energy/exergy of the stream
exiting the process. Moreover, this definition presumes that the energy/exergy
output for this process is heat rejected from the system. Then, we can write
m_ a2 h2 + Q_ c
ηen, 1 ¼ (2.76)
m_ a1 h1
2.9 Sensible Cooling (ω1 ¼ω2 ) 67
T0
m_ a2 ex2 + Q_ c 1
Ts
ηex, 1 ¼ (2.77)
m_ a1 ex1
Another efficiency definition is based on the concept that the required output
of the system is the energy/exergy of the stream leaving the system and that the
required input to the system is the amount of heat rejected from the system to
attain the desired output. In this case,
m_ a2 h2
ηen, 2 ¼ (2.78)
Q_ c
m_ ex
ηex, 2 ¼ a2 2 (2.79)
T0
Q_ c 1
Ts
A third efficiency definition defines the efficiency of the process as the energy/
exergy of output stream plus the amount of heat rejected from the process,
divided by the energy/exergy of the input stream. For this case,
m_ a2 h2 + m_ w2 hw2 + Q_ c
ηen, 3 ¼ (2.80)
m_ a1 h1
T0
m_ a2 ex2 + m_ w2 exw2 + Q_ c 1
Ts
ηex, 3 ¼ (2.81)
m_ a1 ex1
Table 2.4 Thermodynamic Properties at all State Points in a Sensible Cooling Process
State Point P (kPa) T (K) h (kJ/kg) RH s (kJ/kg K) ex (kJ/kg) ω m_ (kg/s)
Using the efficiency expressions in Eqs. (2.76)–(2.81), the energy and exergy
efficiencies for sensible cooling in the example (Fig. 2.21) become as follows:
ηen, 1 ¼ 1 ηen, 2 ¼ 0:97 ηen, 3 ¼ 0:567 ηex, 1 ¼ 0:537 ηex, 2 ¼ 0:067 ηex, 2 ¼ 0:105
1 1
0.8 0.8
0.6 0.6
hen
hex
0.4 0.4
hen,1 hex,1
0.2 0.2
hen,2 hex,2
hen,3 hex,3
0 0
275 280 285 290 295 300
T0 (K)
FIGURE 2.22 Effect of ambient temperature on sensible cooling of various energy and exergy efficiencies.
1 1
hen,1 hex,1
0.6 0.6
hen
hex
0.4 0.4
0.2 0.2
0 0
0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1
RH0
FIGURE 2.23 Effect of ambient relative humidity on sensible cooling of various energy and
exergy efficiencies.
Note that heating of air is also important in heat pumps that provide space
heating. In a heat pump, the air is heated by passing it over a condenser coil
(or the heating coil) that contains a high-temperature working fluid (often a
refrigerant). In some cases, the heating of air is also done to suit different indus-
trial and comfort air conditioning applications where large air conditioning
systems are used.
Q_ h _
Entropy balance : m_ a1 s1 + + Sgen, h ¼ m_ a2 s2 (2.85)
T0
T0
Exergy balance : m_ a1 ex1 + Q_ h 1 _ dest, h
¼ m_ a2 ex2 + Ex (2.86)
Ts
Q_
_ dest,
Ex h ¼ T0 S_gen, h ¼ T0 m_ a2 s2 m_ a1 s1 h (2.87)
T0
2.10.2 Efficiencies
Various efficiencies can be defined for sensible heating. The first defines the effi-
ciency as the ratio of the change in energy/exergy of the air to the energy/exergy
input to the process. In this definition, change in energy/exergy denotes the dif-
ference between the energy/exergy of the stream entering and exiting the pro-
cess. Moreover, this definition states that energy/exergy input to this system is
heat provided to the process to drive the heating operation. That is,
m_ a2 h2 m_ a1 h1
ηen, 1 ¼ (2.88)
Q_ h
m_ a2 ex2 m_ a1 ex1
ηex, 1 ¼ (2.89)
T0 _
1 Qh
T
The second definition of efficiency is based on the concept that the required
output of the system is the energy/exergy of the stream leaving the process
and that the required input by the process is the amount of heat added to
the process. Then,
2.10 Sensible Heating (ω1 ¼ω2 ) 71
m_ a2 h2
ηen, 2 ¼ (2.90)
Q_ h
m_ a2 ex2
ηex, 2 ¼ (2.91)
T0 _
1 Qh
T
The third efficiency defines the efficiency of the system as the energy/exergy of
output stream divided by the amount of heat added to the process plus the
energy/exergy of the input stream. This definition states
m_ a2 h2
ηen, 3 ¼ (2.92)
Q_ h + m_ a1 h1
m_ a2 ex2
ηex, 3 ¼ (2.93)
T0
m_ a1 ex1 + Q_ h 1
Ts
In the analysis, the amount of moisture in the air remains constant ðω1 ¼ ω2 Þ as
it flows through the heating section since the process involves no humidifica-
tion or dehumidification. The inlet state of the air is completely specified, and
the total pressure is 101.325 kPa. The properties of the air at the inlet and exit
states are determined by EES.
Table 2.5 Thermodynamic Properties at Each State Point for Heating with Humidification Process
State Point P (kPa) T (K) h (kJ/kg) RH s (kJ/kg K) ex (kJ/kg) ω m_ (kg/s)
Using the efficiency expressions in Eqs. (2.88)–(2.93), the energy and exergy
efficiencies for sensible heating in the example (Fig. 2.24) are found to be as
follows:
ηen, 1 ¼ 1 ηen, 2 ¼ 1 ηen, 3 ¼ 0:699 ηex, 1 ¼ 0:161 ηex, 2 ¼ 0:141 ηex, 2 ¼ 0:165
1 1
0.8 0.8
0.6 0.6
hen
hex
0.4 0.4
hen,1 hex,1
0.2 0.2
hen,2 hex,2
hen,3 hex,3
0 0
275 280 285 290 295 300
T0 (K)
FIGURE 2.25 Effect of ambient temperature on sensible heating energy and exergy efficiencies.
1 1
hen,1 hex,1
hen,2 hex,2
0.8 hen,3 hex,3 0.8
0.6 0.6
hen
hex
0.4 0.4
0.2 0.2
0 0
0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1
RH0
FIGURE 2.26 Effect of ambient relative humidity on sensible heating energy and exergy efficiencies.
When ordinary air is passed over a warm spray of water, moisture particles from
the spray evaporate partially and the vapor is added to the air, increasing its
moisture content. Also, since the temperature of the moisture is greater than
the DB temperature of the air, there is overall increase in temperature.
During heating and humidification processes, the DB, WB, and DP tempera-
tures of the air increase, along with its relative humidity. The heating and
74 C HA PT E R 2 : Energy and Exergy Assessments
1 1
0.8 0.8
0.6 0.6
hen,1 hex,1
hen
hex
hen,2 hex,2
0.4 0.4
hen,3 hex,3
0.2 0.2
0 0
310 315 320 325 330
T2 (K)
FIGURE 2.27 Effect of outlet temperature on sensible heating energy and exergy efficiencies.
m_ w2 + m_ w ¼ m_ w3 ! m_ a2 ω2 + m_ w ¼ m_ a3 ω3
Sat. vapor
Heating
coils
T1
T3 3
RH1 Air P = 1 atm RH3
V1 1 2
1 2 3
Dry bulb temperature
FIGURE 2.28 Heating with humidification process: schematic (left) and representation on psychrometric chart (right).
2.11 Heating with Humidification 75
m_ a2 h2 + m_ w hw ¼ m_ a3 h3 ðprocess 2 3Þ (2.97)
Q_ in, 13 _
Entropy balance : m_ a1 s1 + m_ w sw + + Sgen, 13 ¼ m_ a3 s3 ðprocess 1 3Þ (2.99)
T0
T0
Exergy balance : Q_ in, 12 1 _ dest, 12
+ m_ a1 ex1 ¼ m_ a2 ex2 + Ex (2.100)
Ts
2.11.2 Efficiencies
Various efficiencies can be defined for heating with humidification. The first is
based on taking the desired output of the system to be the amount of energy
gained by the system and the required input to the system to be the energies
added to the system via heat and hot water. The desired output is the difference
between the energy rates of the stream exiting and entering the system, while
the required input to the system is the sum of the heat rate added to the system
and the energy rate input via the hot water entering the system. In this case,
m_ a3 h3 m_ a1 h1
ηen, 1 ¼ (2.104)
Q_ in + m_ w hw
m_ a2 ex3
ηex, 1 ¼ (2.105)
T0
m_ a1 ex1 + m_ w exw + Q_ in, 13 1
Ts
The second definition of the efficiency treats the desired output of the system as
the energy rate of the exiting stream and the required input as the energy rate
added to the system through heat and hot water. Then,
m_ a3 h3
ηen, 2 ¼ (2.106)
Q_ in + m_ w hw
0 1
B m_ a3 ðexÞ3 m_ a1 ðexÞ1 C
ηex, 2 ¼ B
@ C
A (2.107)
T0 _
1 Qin + m_ w hw
T
76 C HA PT E R 2 : Energy and Exergy Assessments
The third efficiency is defined as the ratio of the energy rate of the exiting stream
to the heat addition rate to the system, carried by the inlet stream and energy of
the hot water:
m_ a3 h3
ηen, 3 ¼ (2.108)
Q_ in + m_ a1 h1 + m_ w hw
0 1
B m_ a3 ðexÞ3 C
ηex, 3 ¼ B
@ C
A (2.109)
T0 _
1 Qin + m_ w ðexÞw
T
Table 2.6 Thermodynamic Properties at State Points for Heating with Humidification Example
State Point P (kPa) T (K) h (kJ/kg) RH s (kJ/kg K) ex (kJ/kg) m_ (kg/s)
Using the efficiencies in Eqs. (2.88)–(2.93), the energy and exergy efficiencies
for heating with humidification in the example are as follows:
ηen, 1 ¼ 1 ηen, 2 ¼ 0:942 ηen, 3 ¼ 1 ηex, 1 ¼ 0:033 ηex, 2 ¼ 0:069 ηex, 2 ¼ 0:081
1
0.2
0.8
0.16
0.6 0.12
hen
hex
0.4 0.08
hen,1 hex,1
0.2 0.04
hen,2 hex,2
hen,3 hex,3
0 0
273 276 279 282 285
T0 [K]
FIGURE 2.30 Effect of ambient temperature on heating with humidification energy and exergy
efficiencies.
78 C HA PT E R 2 : Energy and Exergy Assessments
1 0.1
0.8 0.08
0.6 0.06
hen
hex
0.4 0.04
hen,1 hex,1
0.2 0.02
hen,2 hex,2
hen,3 hex,3
0 0
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
RH0
FIGURE 2.31 Effect of ambient relative humidity on heating with humidification energy and exergy
efficiencies.
moisture is removed since the air is cooled below its DP temperature. The dew
formed on the cooling coil is removed with tubing. In central air conditioning
systems, the cooling coil is cooled by a refrigerant or chilled water.
In a general cooling and dehumidification process, air passes over a coil
through which a cool refrigerant, chilled water, or cooled gas passes. During
the process, the DB, WB, and DP temperatures of air are reduced. As both sen-
sible and latent heats are removed from the air, a reduction is observed in the
enthalpy of the air. The cooling and dehumidification process is represented on
a psychrometric chart as shown in Fig. 2.32 (right side) by a line extending from
the initial condition down and to the left.
Q_ out
Entropy balance : m_ a1 s1 + S_gen ¼ m_ a2 s2 + m_ w sw + (2.113)
Ts
T0
Exergy balance : m_ a1 ex1 ¼ m_ a3 ex3 + m_ w exw + Q_ out 1 _ dest
+ Ex (2.114)
Ts
_
_ dest ¼ T0 S_gen ¼ T0 m_ a3 s3 m_ a1 s1 m_ w sw Qout
Ex (2.115)
Ts
Humidity ratio
Cooling
coils
x 1
1 T1 T
2 RH2 2
RH1
Air P 2
Condensate
Dry bulb temperature
FIGURE 2.32 Cooling with dehumidification: schematic (left) and representation on psychrometric
chart (right).
80 C HA PT E R 2 : Energy and Exergy Assessments
2.12.2 Efficiencies
Various efficiencies can be defined for cooling with dehumidification. For the
first definition, the energy efficiency is defined as the ratio of thermal energy
released by the system plus the energy of the exiting stream to the energy carried
by the incoming stream. The corresponding exergy efficiency is defined simi-
larly, but with exergy quantities. That is,
Q_ out + m_ a2 h2
ηen, 1 ¼ (2.116)
m_ a1 h1
T0 _
1 Qout + m_ a2 ex2
T
ηex, 1 ¼ (2.117)
m_ a1 ex1
The second efficiency definition is based on the ratio of energy of the exiting
stream to the heat rejected by the system. This definition presumes that the pur-
pose of the system is to cool the incoming stream, so the heat rejected by the
system is the actual input to the system. Then,
m_ a2 h2
ηen, 2 ¼ (2.118)
Q_ out
m_ a2 ex2
ηex, 2 ¼ (2.119)
T0 _
1 Qout
T
The third definition of efficiency states that the desired output of the system is
the sum of the heat released by the system, the energy of the exiting stream, and
the energy carried by the water, following the approach of Ratlamwala and
Dincer (2012). However, the required input is the energy of the entering
stream. For this case,
Q_ out + m_ a2 h2 + m_ w hw
ηen, 3 ¼ (2.120)
m_ a1 h1
T0
m_ a2 ex2 + m_ w exw + Q_ out 1
Ts
ηex, 3 ¼ (2.121)
m_ a1 ex1
Table 2.7 Thermodynamic Properties at State Points for Cooling with Dehumidification Example
State Point P (kPa) T (K) h (kJ/kg) RH s (kJ/kg K) ex (kJ/kg) m_ (kg/s)
Using the efficiencies in Eqs. (2.116)–(2.121), the energy and exergy efficien-
cies for cooling with dehumidification example (Fig. 2.33) are found to be as
follows:
ηen, 1 ¼ 0:976 ηen, 2 ¼ 0:999 ηen, 3 ¼ 1 ηex, 1 ¼ 0:624 ηex, 2 ¼ 0:859 ηex, 2 ¼ 0:645
1 1
0.8 0.8
hex
hen 0.4
hen,3 hex,3
0.4
0.2 0.2
0 0
273 276 279 282 285 288
T0 [K]
FIGURE 2.34 Effect of ambient temperature on cooling with dehumidification energy and exergy
efficiencies.
Similarly, Fig. 2.35 demonstrates that ambient relative humidity also has no
effect on all the energy efficiencies, while increasing the ambient relative
humidity causes one of the exergy efficiencies to increase and the other two
to decrease, for the cooling and dehumidification process.
1 1
0.9 0.9
hen
hex
0.8 0.8
hen,1 hex,1
hen,2 hex,2
hen,3 hex,3
0.7 0.7
0.8 0.82 0.84 0.86 0.88 0.9
RH0
FIGURE 2.35 Effect of ambient relative humidity on cooling with dehumidification energy and exergy
efficiencies.
2.13 Adiabatic Mixing of Air Streams 83
_ dest
Exergy balance : m_ a1 ex1 + m_ a2 ex2 ¼ m_ a3 ex3 + Ex (2.126)
For this process, only one efficiency definition is possible based on either
energy or exergy. The efficiency of this process is defined as the ratio of the
energy rate of the exiting stream to the energy rate of the two entering streams.
1 36 °C
8 kg/s
Twb1 = 30 °C
w3
P = 1 atm f3 3
Air T3
10 kg/s
12 °C
2 100%
Thus, energy and exergy efficiencies, respectively, for adiabatic mixing of two air
streams can be written as follows:
m_ a3 h3
ηen ¼ (2.128)
m_ a1 h1 + m_ a2 h2
m_ a3 ex3
ηex ¼ (2.129)
m_ a1 ex1 + m_ a2 ex2
Table 2.8 Thermodynamic Properties at State Points for Adiabatic Mixing Example
State ex
Point h (kJ/kg) m_ (kg/s) P (kPa) RH Tdb (K) Twb (K) ω s (kJ/kg K) (kJ/kg)
1 1
hen,1 hex,1
0.8 0.8
0.6 0.6
hen
hex
0.4 0.4
0.2 0.2
0 0
273 278 283 288 293
T0 [K]
FIGURE 2.37 Effect of ambient temperature on adiabatic mixing energy and exergy efficiencies.
1 1
hen
hex
0.8 0.8
0.6 0.6
hen
hex
0.4 0.4
0.2 0.2
0 0
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
RH0
FIGURE 2.38 Effect of ambient relative on adiabatic mixing energy and exergy efficiencies.
86 C HA PT E R 2 : Energy and Exergy Assessments
that ambient relative humidity also does not affect the energy efficiency,
while the exergy efficiency of adiabatic mixing increases with ambient rela-
tive humidity.
_ dest
Exergy balance : m_ a1 ex1 + m_ w exw ¼ m_ a2 ex2 + Ex (2.134)
2.14.2 Efficiencies
Various efficiencies can be defined for evaporative cooling (Fig. 2.39), that is,
cooling with humidification. The first defines the efficiency as the ratio of the
energy rate gained by the system to the energy rate provided to the system. In
this definition, the rate energy gained by the system is calculated by subtracting
the energy rate of the exiting stream from the energy rate of the entering stream.
However, the energy rate provided to the system is the energy rate of the input
stream and the energy rate of the water. Hence, the first energy and exergy effi-
ciencies can be written as follows:
2.15 Integrated System 87
FIGURE 2.39 Evaporative cooling: schematic (left) and representation on psychrometric chart (right).
m_ a2 h2 + m_ a1 h1
ηen, 1 ¼ (2.136)
m_ a1 h1 + m_ w hw
m_ a2 ex2
ηex, 1 ¼ (2.137)
m_ a1 ex1 + m_ w exw
The second efficiency definition considers the ratio of the energy rate of the exit-
ing stream to the energy rate of the water for the energy efficiency, and the cor-
responding exergy efficiencies then becomes
m_ a2 h2
ηen, 2 ¼ (2.138)
m_ w hw
m_ a2 ðexÞ2
ηex, 2 ¼ (2.139)
m_ w ðexÞw
The third efficiency definition is based on the ratio of energy rate of the exiting
stream to the energy rate of the inlet stream and water, based on the approach of
Ratlamwala and Dincer (2012). In this case,
m_ a2 h2
ηen, 3 ¼ (2.140)
m_ a1 h1 + m_ w hw
m_ a2 ðexÞ2 + m_ a1 ðexÞ1
ηex, 3 ¼ (2.141)
m_ a1 ðexÞ1 + mw ðexÞw
The integrated system produces multiple outputs depending on the load con-
ditions. On a hot day, atmospheric air is first cooled in the evaporator of the
vapor-compression cycle. The heat rejected by the atmospheric air is utilized
by the evaporator to increase the temperature of R-134a. The cooled air is then
used for space cooling and further utilized to cool hot water for residential pur-
poses. But on a cold day, atmospheric air is first heated and humidified using
the heat rejected by the condenser of the vapor compression cycle. The air is
then used for space heating and further used for ventilation purposes.
On a hot day, atmospheric air at 32 °C is first cooled and dehumidified to 20 °C
at state point 2. This air is used for space cooling for residential applications,
leaving at 28 °C at state point 4. This air is further used to cool water from
40 to 32 °C in a cooling tower for residential purposes. The air leaves the cool-
ing tower at an atmosphere at 33 °C.
On a cold day, atmospheric air at 10 °C is first heated and humidified to 48 °C,
from state points 12-15. The heated air is then used for space heating for res-
idential and/or industrial purposes, leaving the building at 32 °C.
Q_
Entropy balance : m_ a1 s1 + S_gen ¼ m_ a2 s2 + m_ w3 sw3 + A (2.145)
Ts
T0
Exergy balance : m_ a1 ex1 ¼ m_ a2 ex2 + m_ w3 exw3 + Q_ A 1 _ dest, A
+ Ex (2.146)
Ts
Q_ B _
Entropy balance : m_ a2 s2 + + Sgen, B ¼ m_ a2 s4 (2.150)
T0
T0
Exergy balance : m_ a2 ex2 + Q_ B 1 _ dest, B
¼ m_ a4 ex4 + Ex (2.151)
Ts
_ _ Q_ B
_ _
Exdest, B ¼ T0 Sgen, B ¼ T0 ma4 s4 ma2 s2 (2.152)
T0
_ dest, C
Exergy balance : m_ a4 ex4 + m_ w4 exw4 ¼ m_ a4 ex5 + Ex (2.157)
Q_ in, 1215 + m_ a12 h12 + m_ w14 h14 ¼ m_ a15 h15 ðprocess 1 3Þ (2.161)
Q_ in, 1215 _
Entropy balance : m_ a12 s12 + m_ w14 s14 + + Sgen, 1215 ¼ m_ a3 s3 ðprocess 1 3Þ
T0
(2.162)
T0
Exergy balance : Q_ in, 1215 1 _ dest, 1215
+ m_ a12 ex12 ¼ m_ a15 ex15 + Ex
Ts
m_ a12 ex15 + m_ w14 ex14 ¼ m_ a15 ex15 + Ex_ dest, 1315 ðprocess 2 3Þ
T0
Q_ in, 1215 1 _ dest, 1215 ðprocess 1 3Þ
+ m_ a12 ex12 + m_ w14 ex14 ¼ m_ a15 ex15 + Ex
Ts
!
Q_ in, 1215
_ dest, 1215 ¼ T0 S_gen, 1215 ¼ T0 m_ a15 s15 m_ a12 s12 m_ w14 s14
Ex (2.163)
T0
Q_ E _
Entropy balance : m_ a15 s15 + + Sgen, E ¼ m_ a16 s16 (2.167)
T0
T0
Exergy balance : m_ a15 ex15 + Q_ E 1 _ dest, E
¼ m_ a16 ex16 + Ex (2.168)
Ts
_
_ dest, E ¼ T0 S_gen, E ¼ T0 m_ a15 s15 m_ a16 s16 QE
Ex (2.169)
T0
Q_
Entropy balance : m_ 9 s9 + S_gen, cond ¼ m_ 9 s9 + cond (2.176)
T0
_ d, cond + Q_ cond 1 T0
Exergy balance : m_ 9 ex9 ¼ m_ 10 ex10 + Ex (2.177)
Ts
_ d, val
Exergy balance : m_ 10 ex10 ¼ m_ 10 ex10 + Ex (2.181)
Q_ evap
Entropy balance : m_ 11 s11 + S_gen, evap + ¼ m_ 8 s8 (2.184)
T0
T0
Exergy balance : m_ 11 ex11 + Q_ evap 1 _ d, comp
¼ m_ 8 ex8 + Ex (2.185)
Ts
0.40
0.35
0.25
0.20
0.15
0.10
0.05
0.00
Cooling Compressor Condenser Space Evaporator Space Throttling
tower cooling heating valve
FIGURE 2.41 Ratio of exergy destruction rate of component to the total exergy destruction rate.
Table 2.9 Exergy Destruction Rates for the Overall Integrated System
and its Components
Component Exergy Destruction Rate (kW)
Cooling tower 77
Compressor 0
Condenser 6425
Space cooler 109
Evaporator 4600
Space heater 5929
Throttling valve 1819
Integrated system 18,959
Q_ c + m_ w, 6 ðh7 h6 Þ + Q_ cond
ηen, c ¼ (2.186)
m_ a, 1 ha, 1 + W_ comp
2.15 Integrated System 93
Correspondingly, the exergy efficiency for a 100% cooling load can be defined as
_ T0 _ T0
Qc 1 + m_ w, 6 ðex7 ex6 Þ + Qcond 1
T2 T9
ηex, c ¼ (2.187)
m_ a, 1 exa, 1 + W_ comp
Q_ h
ηen, h ¼ (2.188)
m_ a, 1 ha, 12 + W_ comp + Q_ evap
The overall energy and exergy efficiencies of the integrated system on an average
day with an ambient temperature of 24 °C can be defined according to a
requirement of 50% cooling load and 50% heating load:
Q_ c + m_ w, 6 ðh7 h6 Þ + Q_ h
ηen, sys ¼ (2.190)
m_ a, 1 ha, 1 + W_ comp
T0 T0
Q_ c 1 + m_ w, 6 ðex7 ex6 Þ + Q_ h 1
T2 T15
ηex, sys ¼ (2.191)
_ _ _
ma, 1 exa, 1 + ma, 1 exa, 12 + W comp
The energy and exergy efficiencies for the integrated system can be evaluated
with the above expressions as follows:
ηen, c ¼ 18:4% ηex, c ¼ 18:1% ηen, h ¼ 77:8%
ηex, h ¼ 75:4% ηen, sys ¼ 18:6% ηex, sys ¼ 33:3%
FIGURE 2.42 Effect of ambient temperature on energy and exergy efficiencies of integrated system for
100% cooling load.
FIGURE 2.43 Effect of ambient temperature on energy and exergy efficiencies of integrated system for
100% heating load.
2.15 Integrated System 95
FIGURE 2.44 Effect of ambient temperature on energy and exergy efficiencies of integrated system for
50% cooling load and 50% heating load.
heating load and 50% cooling load, an increase in the ambient temperature
increases the energy and exergy efficiencies of the system. Figure 2.45 demon-
strates the effect of ambient relative humidity on energy and exergy efficiencies
of the system under different loading conditions. In general, increasing the
ambient relative temperature increases the energy and exergy efficiencies of
the system.
FIGURE 2.45 Effect of ambient relative humidity on energy and exergy efficiencies of integrated system
under different loading conditions.
96 C HA PT E R 2 : Energy and Exergy Assessments
Nomenclature
Ėx exergy rate (kW)
ex specific exergy (kJ/kg)
h specific enthalpy (kJ/kg)
ṁ mass flow rate (kg/s)
P pressure (kPa)
Q heat transfer (kJ)
Q̇ heat rate (kW)
s specific entropy (kJ/kg K)
S entropy rate
T temperature (K or °C)
ρ density (kg/m3)
v specific volume (m3/kg)
Ẇ work rate (kW)
V volume (m3)
Greek symbols
η efficiency
ρ density (kg/m3)
ω specific humidity or humidity ratio (kg/kg)
References 97
Subscripts
a air
c cooling
cd cooling with dehumidification
cond condenser
comp compressor
ct cooling tower
d/dest destruction
en energy
evap evaporator
ex exergy
gen generation
h heating
hh heating with humidification
in input
ref refrigerant
s source
sc space cooling
sh space heating
sys system
val valve
w water
0–17 state points
References
Andreev, L.P., Kostenko, G.N., 1965. Exergetic characteristics of the efficiency of heat exchangers.
Izv. Vuzov Ser. Energetika 3, 53–60.
Dincer, I., Rosen, M.A., 2011. Thermal Energy Storage: Systems and Applications, second ed. Wiley,
London.
Dincer, I., Rosen, M.A., 2013. Exergy-Energy, Environment and Sustainable Development, second
ed. Elsevier, New York.
Dincer, I., Kanoglu, M., Rosen, M.A., 2007. Exergy analysis of psychrometric processes for HVAC&R
applications. ASHRAE Trans. 113, 172–180.
Ghosh, S., Dincer, I., 2015. Development and performance assessment of a new integrated system
for HVAC&R applications. Energy 80, 159–167.
Kanoglu, M., Dincer, I., Rosen, M.A., 2007. Exergy analysis of psychometric processes for HVAC&R
applications. ASHRAE Trans. 113, 172–180.
Mikheev, M.A., 1956. Fundamentals of Heat Transfer. Gosénergoizdat, Moscow.
Ratlamwala, T.A.H., Dincer, I., 2012. Efficiency assessment of key psychrometric processes. Int. J.
Refrig. 36 (3), 1142–1153.
Stecco, S.S., Manfrida, G., 1986. Exergy analysis of compression and expansion processes. Energy
11 (6), 573–577.
Wepfer, W.J., Gaggioli, R.A., Obert, E.F., 1979. Proper evaluation of available energy for HVAC.
ASHRAE Trans. 85 (I), 214–230.