Professional Documents
Culture Documents
⮚ study of observable and measurable behaviour ⮚ the first man to use the word “Educational
⮚ conditioning and reinforcement (rewards and Philosophy”
punishment) Thorndike’s Connectionism Theory
⮚ does NOT give much attention to the MIND and ⮚ “ learning is the result of associations forming
the possiblity of thought processes in the mind between stimuli (S) and response (R)”
IVAN PAVLOV ⮚ “ learning could be adequately explained
⮚ Russian physiologist without considering any unobservable internal
⮚ known for classical conditioning or stimulus states”
substitution ⮚ “ learning has taken place when a strong
⮚ involved in animal studies connection or bond between stimulus and
⮚ experiment involved a meat, a dog and a bell response is formed”
Pavlov’s Classical Conditioning
Example: Thorndike's Laws of Learning
⮚ Conditioned Nausea - the sight or smell of a
particular food causes nausea because it caused 1. Law of Effect
stomach upset in the past. ⮚ positive consequence results strong
⮚ When you associate particular objects with connection
your teacher and later on encounter the ⮚ negative consequence results weak
objects, you are also reminded of your teacher. connection
- a.k.a Pavlonian or respondent conditioning Note:
Thorndike later on revised this “law” when he
found out that negative rewards do not necessarily
Pavlov’s Findings weaken bonds and some positive ones do not
1. Stimulus Generalization- Once the dog has necessarily motivate performance.
learned to salivate at the sound, it will salivate
at other similar sound. 2. Law of Exercise
2. Extinction- If you stop pairing the bell with the ⮚ the more S-R bond is practiced, the
food, the salivation will eventually cease in stronger it will become
response to bell ⮚ “practice makes perfect”
3. Spontaneous Recovery- Extinguished response NOTE:
can be “recovered” after an elapsed time but This is also revised when Thorndike found out
will soon extinguished again if the dog is not that PRACTICE WITHOUT FEEDBACK does not
presented with food. necessarily enhance performance.
4. Discrimination - The dog could learn to
discriminate between similar bells (stimuli) and 3. Law of Readiness
discern which bell would result in the ⮚ the more the readiness the learner has to
presentation of food and which would not respond to the stimulus, the stronger will be the
5. High-Order Conditioning- Once the dog has bond between them
been conditioned to associate to bell with food,
another unconditional stimulus, such as a light
may be flashed at the same time that the bell is
rung. Eventually, the dog will salivate at the
flash of the light without the sound of the bell.
NEO-BEHAVIORISM