Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ASSEMBLY OF BUILDING
by 119.235.51.123 on 02/16/22. Re-use and distribution is strictly not permitted, except for Open Access articles.
Construction Technology for Tall Buildings Downloaded from www.worldscientific.com
Tall building 50 m
Supertall building 300 m
Megatall building 600 m
It has always been a human aspiration to create taller and taller struc
tures. Ancient structures such as the Tower of Babel, Colossus of Rhodes,
the pyramids of Egypt, Mayan temples of Mexico, the Kutub Minar of
India and many more were apparently built as symbols of power. They
were monumental, protected and were infrequently used. Today, the deter-
mining factors for buildings to become higher are mainly the economic
and social factors, although human ego and competition are still playing a
role.
The history of the development of tall buildings can be broadly
classified into three periods. The first period saw the erection of buildings
such as the Reliance Building (Chicago, 1894, Figure 1.1), the Guaranty
Building (Buffalo, 1895, Figure 1.2), and the Carson Pirie Scott Depart
ment Store (Chicago, 1904, Figure 1.3). Most of these buildings were
masonry wall bearing structures with thick and messy walls. The vertical
and lateral loads of these structures were mainly resisted by the load
wall construction.
In the second period, with the evolution of steel structures, and sophis
ticated services such as mechanical lifts and ventilation, limitations on the
Construction Technology for Tall Buildings Downloaded from www.worldscientific.com
height of buildings were removed. The demand for tall buildings increased
in this period as corporations recognised the advertising and publicity
advantages of connecting their names with imposing high-rise office
buildings. It was also seen as sound financial investment as it could gen-
erate high rental income. The race for tallness commenced with a focus on
Chicago and New York. Among the more famous buildings evolved during
the period were the Woolworth Building (New York, 1930, Figure 1.5) and
the Chrysler Building (New York, 1930, Figure 1.6). The race ended with
the construction of the Empire State Building (New York, 1931, Figure 1.7)
which, measuring 381 m with the television antenna, was the tallest struc-
ture until 1970 [2–6].
Reinforced concrete established its own identity in the 1950’s into the
third period which is now regarded as modernism in construction history.
In contrast to the previous periods, where architectural emphasis was on
external dressing and historical style, the third period placed emphasis
on (a) reasons (b) functional and (c) technological facts [7]. This new
generation of buildings evolved from World Trade Center (New York,
1972–2001, Figure 1.8), Sears Tower (Chicago, 1974, Figure 1.9), Petronas
Towers (Kuala Lumpur, 1996, Figure 1.10), Taipei 101 (Taipei, 2004,
Figure 1.11), to Burj Khalifa (Dubai, 2009, Figure 1.12) [8].
The amount of materials needed in a tall building for the resistance of
gravity load is almost linear with its height. However, the same materials
needed for the resistance of lateral load (mainly wind load) increases as
the square of the wind speed. The Sears Tower (Figure 1.9) which is about
twice as tall as the Woolworth Building (Figure 1.5) has to resist wind
effects four times as large [9]. The third period of tall buildings saw the
transition of structural systems from rigid frame to more efficient struc-
tural systems [10]. The concept of channelling the gravity and wind loads
using two or more separate structural systems, giving rise to buildings with
Figure 1.3. Carson Pirie Scott Depart- Figure 1.4. Manadnock Building,
ment Store (now called the Sullivan Chicago, 1891.
Center), Chicago, 1904.
Figure 1.7. Empire State Building, Figure 1.8. World Trade Center,
New York, 1931. New York, 1972–2001.
Figure 1.11. Taipei 101, Taipei, 2004. Figure 1.12. Burj Khalifa, Dubai, 2009.
14
28
C = 605 m2
D = 802 m2
C D
Simple vs Complicated
Figure 1.13. With the same floor area, due to different shapes (B versus A) and/or con-
figurations (D versus C), the wall area may be much larger. Wall area reflects better the
actual quantity of construction works which may include formwork, scaffolding, walling,
downpipes, jointing etc.
in all X, Y and Z
directions.
Construction Technology for Tall Buildings Downloaded from www.worldscientific.com
Cupboard on wall
1 2 Low
There is The dimensions Accuracy
1 restraint i.e. of X1 and X 2 are required in X
in X direction. critical. direction. No
tolerance in X
dimension for the
X2
X1 partition and the
opening.
Wall partitions
2 4 Medium
There are The dimensions of Accuracy
X2 2 restraints X1 and X 2 and Y1 required in X
Y1
i.e. in X and and Y2 are critical. and Y directions.
Y2
Y directions. The X and Y
X1 dimensions of the
window frame and
the opening must
Window in opening be correct.
X1 3 6 High
There are The dimensions Accuracy in X, Y
Y1
3 restraints of X1, Y1, and Z1, and Z directions.
i.e. in X, Y and and Z 2, Y2, Z 2 are The X, Y and Z
Z directions. critical. dimensions of
X2
Z2 the volumetric
Y2 unit as well as the
opening must be
correct.
Low
Quality
Time Cost
Impossible
by 119.235.51.123 on 02/16/22. Re-use and distribution is strictly not permitted, except for Open Access articles.
Expensive Slow
Quality
Construction Technology for Tall Buildings Downloaded from www.worldscientific.com
Figure 1.15. The three principal project goals of Cost, Quality and Time.
Building regulations set out the scope, namely, the submission of plans
and specifications of works, the authorisation of persons qualified to submit
the same and their duties and responsibilities, the construction, alteration
and demolition of buildings with special emphasis on frontage, airspace,
lighting, air conditioning, ventilation, height, approaches, entrances and
exits, damp proofing, building materials, structural stability, drainage,
by 119.235.51.123 on 02/16/22. Re-use and distribution is strictly not permitted, except for Open Access articles.
Technical
Development Building
Department
Control System Control System
Clearances
1.5. Industrialisation
Industrialisation for construction is often related to prefabricating in a
plant the maximum number of building works with the appropriate equip-
ment and efficient technological and managerial methods. The greater
the number of prefabricated components that are produced in the plant,
by 119.235.51.123 on 02/16/22. Re-use and distribution is strictly not permitted, except for Open Access articles.
the fewer the on-site works required. This will significantly reduce the
dependence on manual labour, the weather, the site and various other
constraints [11]. Figure 1.17 shows examples of buildings assembled using
Construction Technology for Tall Buildings Downloaded from www.worldscientific.com
Construction cycle:
2.5 floors/day
Construction Technology for Tall Buildings Downloaded from www.worldscientific.com
Name: T-30
Year: 2011
Height: 30 storeys
Duration: 15 days
Construction cycle:
2 floors/day
Landing façade
E&T duct
Staircase flight
Service duct
Partition
Household shelter
by 119.235.51.123 on 02/16/22. Re-use and distribution is strictly not permitted, except for Open Access articles.
Prestressed plank/slab
Construction Technology for Tall Buildings Downloaded from www.worldscientific.com
Integrated
Column/shear wall Hollow core beam/partition
wall
Figure 1.18. Isometric view of the structural system and major components of an indus-
trialised building.
Figure 1.19(a). Adoption of PPVC for Crowne Plaza Changi Airport hotel extension.
Figure 1.19(b). PPVC rooms completed in the factory with finishes, fixtures and fitting
are transported and assembled on site.
1. Phases of a Building/Facility
1.
1. Phases
Phases of
of a
a Building/Facility
Building/Facility
2. Resources 3. Principles
2.
2. Resources
Resources 3.
3. Principles
Principles
Is the energy
consumed once or Initial Recurring
throughout life
by 119.235.51.123 on 02/16/22. Re-use and distribution is strictly not permitted, except for Open Access articles.
Embodied Energy
Figure 1.21. Embodied energy.
Figure 1.22. Embodied energy values based on several international sources [15].
the life of the product [16]. Figure 1.23 shows the overall material/product
selection criteria according to:
• Resource efficiency.
• Indoor air quality.
• Energy efficiency.
by 119.235.51.123 on 02/16/22. Re-use and distribution is strictly not permitted, except for Open Access articles.
• Water conservation.
• Affordability.
Construction Technology for Tall Buildings Downloaded from www.worldscientific.com
Green Building
Materials
locally alternative
low VOC recyclability
available energy
durable
Figure 1.24. Recycling process of concrete from construction, renovation and demoli-
tion (CRD) of old buildings (courtesy: Samwoh Corporation Pte Ltd).
Figure 1.25. Recycling process of incinerator ash from MSW (courtesy: Samwoh Cor
poration Pte Ltd).
under construction through elevators and are lifted to the exact location of
the floor by cranes. Welding and fastening are then carried out by robots.
Construction Technology for Tall Buildings Downloaded from www.worldscientific.com
Product Climbing
Year Name Company Mechanism Example
Technology)
1990 Roof Push-up Takenaka Push-up floor or roof floor (RF)
is first constructed. Push up RF,
construct the 1st floor, then push
Construction Technology for Tall Buildings Downloaded from www.worldscientific.com
1992 T-Up System Taisei and With the building core as the
(Totally Mitsubishi support, the production platform
Mechanised is elevated with hydraulic jacks
Construction to the desired floor along guide
System) columns [21].
by 119.235.51.123 on 02/16/22. Re-use and distribution is strictly not permitted, except for Open Access articles.
Figure 1.26. An example of robotised construction — a control centre (top left), automatic storage and delivery system (bottom left), SCF —
14-Jun-17 9:40:25 AM
by 119.235.51.123 on 02/16/22. Re-use and distribution is strictly not permitted, except for Open Access articles.
Construction Technology for Tall Buildings Downloaded from www.worldscientific.com
The delivery system is installed under the The canopy preserves the excavation site
canopy. from weather changes.
High stories
Low stories
Assembly of Building 25
Skeleton, Equipment and Finishing Work Canopy Disassembly Construction Completion
Figure 1.27. An example of robotised construction — Big Canopy (courtesy: Obayashi Corporation).
26 Construction Technology for Tall Buildings
Component
Suppliers
by 119.235.51.123 on 02/16/22. Re-use and distribution is strictly not permitted, except for Open Access articles.
Fabricators
1. The Digital Mock-Up (DMU) is 2. The Design Validation phase is 3. The construction process is 4. For Project Management the 5. The As-Built Virtual Building
the full 3D building model of the based on the integrated DMU, simulated and visualised for DMU with BIM data is tied to model is synchronised with Facility
building. The DMU will facilitate encompassing the structural, optimisation of logistics, crew and resources, tasks, issues and Management systems to create a
building environment simulations mechanical and electrical plans. traffic. The result is an optimised documentation needed to living data-set with history. Change
and provide accurate visualisations Development parties identify and work breakdown schedule for complete the project. In the of use or alternations are updated
for the following phase resolve issues throughout this construction. construction phase the DMU and as they occur, contributing towards
validation phase. BIM data is coupled with resource a highly informative and optimised
planning systems to actively life-cycle.
monitor the project
Figure 1.28. Benefits of BIM and integration of various disciplines with refinement of
digital information throughout a building life cycle.
References
[1] B. S. Taranath, Structural Analysis and Design of Tall Buildings, CRC
Press, 2011.
[2] J. S. Foster and R. Greenor, Structure and Fabric, Part 1, 7th Edition,
Longman Scientific & Technical, 2006.
[3] L. Hudson, Chicago Skyscrapers, Arcadia Publishing, 2004.
[4] P. Goldberger, The Skyscraper, 3rd Edition, Knopf, 1983.
[5] L. S. Beedle, editor-in-chief, “Second Century of the Skyscraper”, Council
on Tall Buildings and Urban Habitat, Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1988.
[6] E. Nash and N. McGrath, Manhattan Skyscrapers, 3rd Edition, Princeton
Architectural Press, 2010.
[7] G. H. Douglas, Skyscrapers: A Social History of the Very Tall Building
in America, McFarland & Co., 2004.
[8] J. Dupre, Skyscrapers: A History of the World’s Most Extraordinary
Buildings, Black Dog & Leventhal, 2013.
[9] M. Salvadori, Why Buildings Stand Up: The Strength of Architecture,
WW Norton, New York, Reissue Edition, 2002.