You are on page 1of 4

Thermal Management of Silicon Carbide Power Module for Military Hybrid Vehicles

Kyle Gould, Steve Q.Cai, Charles Neft, and Avijit Bhunia


Teledyne Scientific & Imaging, LLC
1049 Camino Dos Rios
Thousand Oaks, CA 91360, U.S.A.
Avijit.bhunia@teledyne.com

the vehicle where local air temperature routinely exceeds


Abstract
100°C. Under these extreme conditions, the use of
De-rating of power electronics is a common practice in
commercial-off-the-shelf (COTS) heat sinking solutions is
harsh environment operating conditions. Advanced cooling
often insufficient. As a result the power modules are routinely
solutions are needed to overcome the thermal limitations and
operated at a lower power level to ensure Tj stays at a
prevent the de-rating of power components. This study
desirable level and reliable operation is achieved. There is a
investigates a silicon carbide power module for 28 V DC to
critical need for high heat flux cooling solutions in custom-
300 V DC power conversion (or reverse) in military hybrid
made heat sinks.
vehicle applications. A combined experimental and numerical
A significant amount of research over the past decade has
modeling effort is reported, to accurately predict the silicon
focused on various high heat flux liquid cooling techniques
carbide switch (device) junction temperature. The results
for power converter modules. Micro or mini-channel flow
show that jet impingement cooling at the module base plate
[e.g. 1, 2], spray [e.g. 3, 4], and jet impingement [e.g. 5, 6] are
increases the module heat dissipation capability by 2.5X and
the most commonly investigated approaches. In this article we
1.5X, compared to the commercial-off-the-shelf cold plate
present a resounding evidence of the necessity of these
cooling and micro-channel cooling solutions respectively.
solutions and their effectiveness for cooling, specifically for
Keywords silicon carbide (SiC) power electronics developed for military
Silicon carbide power electronics, Thermal management, hybrid vehicle applications. A jet impingement-cooled heat
Liquid cooling, Jet impingement, Harsh environment exchanger has been designed for cooling the base plate of a
600 V/ 50 A SiC power module (rated at 175°C device
Nomenclature
junction temperature) using 100oC WEG coolant. The jet
Tj Device junction temperature (°C). impingement-cooled heat exchanger was compared with two
k Thermal conductivity (W/mK). COTS solutions, a cold plate with embedded tube and a
Dj Jet diameter (µm). micro-channel cooler.
S Standoff or impingement distance (µm).
2. Silicon Carbide (SiC) Power Module Cooling Study
S/Dj Dimensionless standoff or impingement
distance. A high-temperature, SiC Junction Field Effect Transistor
(JFET) power module is designed and tested for use in a bi-
QL Coolant flow rate (cm3/min).
directional, single-stage DC-DC converter. The converter is
Rj-c Thermal resistance from junction to coolant
the interface between a 28 V battery and a 300 V bus, and is
(°C/W).
required to operate in the harsh environment of a military
ΔP Pressure drop (psi). hybrid vehicle, with 100°C WEG liquid coolant and an
QH Heat dissipation (Watts). ambient air temperature of 120°C. The power module consists
TL,in Coolant inlet temperature (°C). of two switches in a single pole configuration with SiC
1. Introduction Schottky diodes used as freewheeling diodes. The
Thermal management of semiconductor devices in power components are mounted on an aluminum-nitride (AlN)
modules is an important problem for a variety of power direct-bonded copper (DBC) substrate, which is bonded to a
conversion applications. Device junction temperature Tj needs high thermal conductivity graphite-aluminum baseplate (k
to be maintained below a desirable temperature for reliability. ~350 W/mK). A high-temperature Boron-Nitride loaded
Wide bandgap devices, such as silicon carbide (SiC), reliably Silicone gel, stable up to ~320°C is used for passivation.
operate at Tj of 175°C and offer an advantage when compared Under the prescribed operating conditions, the module is
with traditional silicon devices which need to be maintained designed for an output power of 937.5 W. Figures 1 shows a
at ≤ 125°C, thus it is expected that the requirements for SiC picture of the module.
power electronics cooling would be significantly lower. During the initial tests of 28 V to 300 V DC power
However, much of this benefit can be lost in a harsh operating conversion, the module was mounted on a COTS aluminum
environment. For example, power electronics in hybrid cold plate with embedded meandering copper tube. A number
vehicles need to be cooled by anti-freeze liquid, water- of modules failed within the first one or two hours of
ethylene glycol (WEG) or water-propylene glycol (WPG) operation, while the goal was to demonstrate power
mixture available at ~100°C with a limited supply dictated by conversion for fifty hours. We suspected part of the problem
the system-level pressure drop requirements. The enclosed was thermal. Possibly the cooling technique was not adequate
power electronics box needs to be placed under the hood of and the device junction temperature was far exceeding the

978-1-4799-4374-6/14/$31.00 ©2014 IEEE 105 30th SEMI-THERM Symposium

Authorized licensed use limited to: NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY CALICUT. Downloaded on October 09,2021 at 03:42:53 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
reliable operating point of 175°C. Yet, we could not directly predicts the SiC JFET device junction temperature. Figures 3
measure the device junction temperature under operating shows an example of the computational model developed with
condition due to the presence of opaque passivating gel. temperature profile of two JFET devices at the middle of the
sixteen device array. An estimate of the device junction
Lower JFET Switches temperature (Tj), obtained by this combined experimental-
computational modeling approach, is used to compare various
cooling solutions.

Upper
Diodes
Lower
Diodes

Upper JFET Switches


Figure 1: SiC power module designed for 938 W output
power.
To conduct a systematic study on COTS cooling
techniques and advanced, high heat flux cooling techniques,
we used a dummy module. We conducted a few preliminary
experiments with the SiC module, converting from 28 V DC Figure 3: Example of temperature contours of two JFET
to 300 V DC and vice versa at various operating frequency device die at the center of the sixteen die array of the lower
conditions and measured the power conversion efficiency. switch of the module, obtained by computational model using
Based on these experiments, we established that the 16 JFETs ANSYS FLUENTTM.
of the lower switch are the primary heat dissipating The heater block with its base plate shown in Figure 2 is
components and made a reasonable estimate of the heat loss cooled by three cooling approaches, COTS cold plate, COTS
from these components (151 W). Subsequently, for the micro-channel, and liquid jet impingement. WEG coolant (50
purpose of the present study, we developed a dummy module, volume% mixture of water and ethylene glycol), at an inlet
a simplified resistive heat source, mimicking heat dissipation temperature of 100°C, is used for all three cooling
from the 16 JFETs. The base plate temperatures under these approaches. For COTS cold plate and micro-channel cooling,
resistive heat sources are measured experimentally. Figure 2 the heater block/ base plate assembly is mounted on the
shows a schematic of the mimicked module. cooling solution with four bolts and thermal paste between the
cooling solution and the copper base plate. The COTS cooling
solutions are shown in Figure 4.

 
 
(a) (b)
Figure 2: Schematic of the experimental copper heater block
with sixteen legs mimicking the lower switch or sixteen JFET Figure 4: Commercial-off-the-shelf (COTS) cooling
devices of the 938 W SiC module. approaches: (a) Cold plate – liquid-cooled heat sink with
meandering copper tube embedded into an aluminum base
We also developed a high-fidelity, finite volume-based plate. Cold plate dimensions: 0.152 m × 0.089 m × 0.0127 m.
computational model of heat conduction through the device Embedded tube diameter: 0.009525 m (3/8th inch). (b) Micro-
packaging layers, using the commercial software tool ANSYS channel cooler overall dimensions: 0.127 m × 0.064 m ×
FLUENT. The model uses heat load on each JFET die and the 0.0127 m. Inlet and outlet tube diameter 0.0095 m. Micro-
experimentally measured heat transfer coefficient (at the channel dimensions: Channel width 8 × 10-4 m (800 µm),
dummy module base plate) as boundary conditions, and height 0.0048 m, 42 channels.
Gould, Thermal Management of Silicon Carbide Power … 30th SEMI-THERM Symposium

Authorized licensed use limited to: NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY CALICUT. Downloaded on October 09,2021 at 03:42:53 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
For liquid jet impingement cooling, an array of 16 jets, lower switch power dissipation condition of 151 W. These
each 200 µm in diameter (Dj) impinge on the base plate at the results show a drastic improvement in performance for the jet
center of the footprint location of each of the 16 legs. The impingement cooling, including a 2.5X and 1.5X increase in
impingement distance (S), i.e. the distance between the top power dissipation capability over the COTS cold plate and
wall of the micro-orifice plate from where the jet emerges and micro-channel cooler respectively while keeping the junction
the base plate of the heater block, is kept constant at 200 µm, temperature (Tj) below 175 °C.
thus the impingement corresponds to a confined jet
impingement solution with S/Dj = 1. Being a confined jet, the Rj-c Tj at QH at ΔP
cooling solution is expected to be gravity-independent, (°C/W) QH = 151 W Tj = 175 °C (Psi)
although we did not conduct a verification test. The jet
COTS cold plate 1.25 289.5 60 1
impingement parameters chosen in this study are based on our
prior experience and multiple publications (e.g. [5, 7]). They COTS micro-
0.76 215.0 99 1
may not be optimal and the optimization is not the focus of channel cooler
this study. Further experiments can be done to investigate the Jet impingement
0.45 168.5 167 5
jet pattern, jet diameter, and the standoff distance. cooling

3. Results & Discussion Table I: Comparison of thermal and pressure drop


Figure 5 shows a comparison of the COTS cold plate performance of commercial-off-the-shelf (COTS) cold plate,
cooling with the jet impingement cooling solution. An micro-channel cooler and optimized jet impingement cooling.
average of the sixteen base plate temperature measurements Rj-c is device junction to coolant thermal resistance, Tj =
are reported at various heat dissipation conditions at a maximum JFET device junction temperature, QH = heat
constant coolant flow rate of 156 cm3/min. The benefit of jet dissipation, and ΔP = pressure drop in the cooling loop.
impingement cooling at lowering the mimicked module base Coolant flow rate (QL) = 195 cm3/min with an inlet
plate temperature is evident. At the design heat load of 151 temperature (TL,in) of 100 °C.
W, which corresponds to 273 W/cm2 heat flux at the device-
Table I also shows a comparison of pressure drop (ΔP) in
level, the base plate temperature is lowered from 165°C to
the cooling loop, an indication of the pump input power for
121°C.
various cooling techniques. ΔP in the COTS cooling
technique is ~1 psi, which is the minimum resolution of the
pressure gauge used in this experiment. In comparison, ΔP is
~5X higher for jet impingement cooling. One can potentially
argue that the thermal performance of the COTS cooling
solutions could be better with higher flow rate and matching
ΔP. However, the application limits the flow rate.
Furthermore, a generic conclusion based on this particular
comparison is misleading. The current setup of the mimicked
module cooling has only 16 jets. An actual system will consist
of hundreds of jets. For example, the 938 W SiC module
considered in this study is one of eight modules put together
for a 7.5 kW DC DC converter system. An impingement-
cooled converter will have 352 jets (44 jets per module × 8
modules). For a jet impingement cooling system most of the
ΔP occurs in the micro-orifices. Our prior work [8] shows that
increasing the number of jets does not significantly alter the
Figure 5: Comparison of liquid micro-jet impingement overall ΔP as an array of micro-orifices act as parallel paths.
cooling with COTS cold plate: Variation of experimentally In other words ΔP for jet impingement cooling does not scale
measured base plate temperature at various heat dissipation up as more impingement-cooled modules are added in parallel
conditions at a constant coolant flow rate (QL) of 156 and the flow rate (QL) increases. In comparison for flow
cm3/min. Coolant: 50-50 volume% of water-ethylene glycol at through tube and micro-channels as in COTS cooling, ΔP
100°C coolant temperature. increase is proportional to QL2. Thus we expect for larger
system, such as the 7.5 kW converter, ΔP and pump input
The base plate temperature measurements are then used to power will be comparable, if not better, for jet impingement
calculate the heat transfer coefficient at the base plate of the cooling.
mimicked module. Subsequently this heat transfer coefficient
4. Conclusions
value is used as a boundary condition in the ANSYS
Liquid jet impingement cooling of high power converter
FLUENT model of the power convertor module to determine
modules can significantly improve the power module rating
the SiC JFET device junction temperature. Table I shows a
compared to traditional cooling techniques. In this paper we
comparison of the results for a COTS cold plate, a COTS
show a drastic improvement in module heat dissipation
micro-channel cooler, and jet impingement at the SiC module
capability, 2.5X improvement over COTS cold plate and a

Gould, Thermal Management of Silicon Carbide Power … 30th SEMI-THERM Symposium

Authorized licensed use limited to: NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY CALICUT. Downloaded on October 09,2021 at 03:42:53 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
1.5X improvement over current state of the art micro-channel
cooler. Jet impingement offers an efficient way to allow
current power electronics to be pushed to new levels of power
output without compromising reliability.
Acknowledgments
The authors gratefully acknowledge financial support
from the U.S. Army Tank and Automotive Research
Development & Engineering Center (TARDEC, Contract no
W56HZV-10-C-0114) under the Program monitoring of Mr.
Matthew Walters, Kevin Boice, Gus Khalil, and George
Hamilton. Any opinions, findings and conclusions or
recommendations expressed in this material are those of the
author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the U.S.
Army Contracting Command. The technical discussion and
help from colleagues Mr. Emil Hanna and Dr. Vivek
Mehrotra are highly appreciated. We also wish to thank
colleagues Mr. Alex Moffatt and Mark Gardner for
fabrication of the test setup.
References
1. N. R. Jankowski, L. Everhart, B. R. Geil, C. W. Tipton, J.
Chaney, T. Heil, and W. Zimbeck, “Stereolithographically
Fabricated Aluminum Nitride Microchannel Substrates for
Integrated Power Electronics Cooling”, Proceed. 11th
ITherm, Orlando, FL, 2008, pp. 180 – 188.
2. L. Boteler, D. Urciuoli, G. Ovrebo, D. Ibitayo, and R.
Green, “Thermal Performance of a Dual 1.2 kV, 400 A
Silicon-Carbide MOSFET Power Module”, Proceed. 26th
IEEE Semi-Therm Sym., San Jose, CA, 2010, pp. 170 –
175.
3. R.G. Mertens, L. Chow, K.B.Sundaram, R.B.Cregger,
D.P.Rini, L.Turek, and B.A. Saarloos, “Spray Cooling of
IGBT Devices”, J. Electronic Packaging, v 129, pp. 316 –
323, Sep 2007.
4. L.J. Turek, D.P. Rini, B.A. Saarloos, and L.C. Chow,
“Evaporative Spray Cooling of Power Electronics using
High Temperature Coolant”, Proceed. 11thITherm,
Orlando, FL, 2008, pp. 346 – 351.
5. A. Bhunia, S. Chandrasekaran, and C.L. Chen,
“Performance Improvement of an IGBT Inverter Module
by Liquid Micro-jet Impingement Cooling”, IEEE J.
Comp. Packaging Tech., v 30, n 2, pp. 309 – 316, June
2007.
6. P.R. Parida, S.V. Ekkad, and K. Ngo, “Impingement-
based high performance cooling configurations for
automotive power converters”, Intl J. Heat Mass Transfer,
v 55, pp. 834 – 847, 2012.
7. A. Bhunia and C.L. Chen, “Jet Impingement Cooling of
an Inverter Module in the Harsh Environment of a Hybrid
Vehicle”, HT05-2005-72574, Proc. ASME Summer Heat
Transfer Conf., San Francisco, CA, July 2005.
8. Bhunia, A. and Chen, C.L., “Pressure Drop in Generating
Free-surface Liquid Micro-jet Array from Short
Cylindrical Orifices”, Journal of Fluids Engineering, v
133, n 6, Art 061103, Jun 2011.

Gould, Thermal Management of Silicon Carbide Power … 30th SEMI-THERM Symposium

Authorized licensed use limited to: NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY CALICUT. Downloaded on October 09,2021 at 03:42:53 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.

You might also like