Professional Documents
Culture Documents
full
full
by Shian Chrizel Tabuno
General metrics
74,135 11,287 1651 45 min 8 sec 1 hr 26 min
characters words sentences reading speaking
time time
Plagiarism
4 27
%
sources
Writing Issues
217 Clarity
55 Wordy sentences
105 Passive voice misuse
5 Hard-to-read text
39 Unclear sentences
13 Intricate text
98 Engagement
96 Word choice
2 Monotonous sentences
431 Correctness
4 Improper formatting
49 Punctuation in compound/complex
sentences
32 Wrong or missing prepositions
20 Faulty subject-verb agreement
41 Comma misuse within clauses
7 Confused words
3 Text inconsistencies
41 Misspelled words
116 Determiner use (a/an/the/this, etc.)
2 Misuse of modi ers
12 Misplaced words or phrases
7 Incorrect verb forms
15 Incorrect noun number
12 Incomplete sentences
13 Pronoun use
2 Modal verbs
5 Closing punctuation
1 Conditional sentences
39 Misuse of semicolons, quotation marks, etc.
3 Redundant words
6 Unknown words
1 Commonly confused words
4 Delivery
4 Inappropriate colloquialisms
Word Length 5
Measures average word length characters per word
full
2
Chapter 1
THE PROBLEM AND ITS SCOPE
INTRODUCTION
Rationale
751
The Bohol Island State University (BISU), formerly the Central Visayas State
College of Agriculture, Forestry and Technology (CVSCAFT), is a public
institution of higher learning in Bohol, Philippines. BISU was born on October
3 4
14,2009 after Her Excellency Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo signed into law Republic
752
Act 9722. The institution operates campuses spread throughout the province,
with the main campus in Tagbilaran City, Bohol. BISU - Bilar campus is one of
5 6
these campuses and it's located at barangay Zamora from the municipality of
Bilar.
Bohol Island State University – Bilar campus currently use the manual method
in some of its activities, including the internal accreditation required by the
Accrediting Agency of Chartered Colleges and Universities in the Philippines
753
(AACCUP), Inc. AACCUP accreditation is viewed as a process by which is an
7 8
institution at the tertiary level evaluates its educational activities and it is
9,10
evaluated by programs based on standards of the accrediting agency (Corpus,
11
M., 2017). BISU, being the only state university on the province of Bohol, is
mandated to undergo accreditation from external entities to ensure quality
standards of its graduates.
12 13
The BISU – Bilar uses manual internal accreditation processes which includes
14 15 16
the processes of data recording, internal accreditation and archiving of les. To
17 18
address the problems encountered, the developers come-up with a centralized
accreditation system that will provide storage for the documents needed for
the internal accreditation of their programs.
751
Literature Background
752
Article XIV Section 10 of the Philippine Constitution states that:
754
"Science and technology are essential for national development and progress.
19
The State shall give priority to research and development, invention,
innovation, and their utilization; and to science and technology education,
20
training, and services. It shall support indigenous, appropriate, and self-reliant
scienti c and technological capabilities, and their application to the country's
productive systems and national life.".
753
19
The article clearly states that the state shall recognize the use of science and
21
technology in nation building, such as computerizing the manual process of
program accreditations and le archiving of the universities and state colleges
during internal accreditations. It is essential that universities and state
22 23
colleges should be incorporated with the advancement of computers to cope
751 24 25
up the challenges of the present times. A website intended for internal
accreditation must have the tools and documents required to perform program
accreditation.
752
26 27 28 29
Basic theories were applied in the design of the system which are needed to
754
conceptualize the study. Concurrency control is one of the principles of
755 30
database management system stated by Pekka Kilpeläinen (2001). It ensures
31
that correct results for concurrent operations are generated while getting those
32 33
results as quick as possible. Rules, methods, design methodologies and
3
theories to maintain the consistency of the components operating concurrently
35 36
was also provided. The system was applied with operation constraints which
37
usually result in performance reduction. Accuracy and consistency of the
753 38 39,40
operation should be obtained with a good ef ciency without reducing its
41 42 43 4
performance. It's very useful in system's development in order to have a proper
management of the les.
49 50
There are some related studies that are available and were used as references.
51
These studies were obtained from the internet. Among these signi cant
studies are:
751
53
displays the information of the uploaded les that also has a download button
754 54 55 56
at the last column. It can also produce graphical reports that shows the
755 57
number of les uploaded per uploaders.
58
Faculty Evaluation System by George Wilson et al. (2020). The web-based
59 60 61
system is developed to evaluate faculty performance of a certain school. The
system allows the admin to manipulate students and faculty information. It
753 62
also allows the admin to add and remove user's accounts. Faculty performance
63 64 65
evaluation can also be performed in the system a using personalized
questionnaires that are exible to changes. The system can produce tabular
66
reports and displays graphical reports on its dashboard.
67
Teacher' Evaluation System of Carlos Hidalgo Memorial College by Rolyn Jane
Uy and Mark King et al. (2019). The system is the teacher evaluation system
68
currently implemented at the Carlos Hidalgo Memorial College located at the
69
Talisay City, Negros Occidental, Philippines. The system allows the teachers
70
and students on evaluating teachers using static evaluation questionnaires and
71
can automatically calculate the ratings depending on the user's input. The
system also allows the admin to manage accounts of students and teachers. It
72
also has tables that lter data depending on user's desired categories and. The
751
system also can produce printable tabular reports.
752
754
755
753
THE PROBLEM
STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM
756
The main aim of this study is to develop and implement a centralized
accreditation system for BISU – Bilar that will have available tools needed for
73
757 the accreditation of programs. Speci cally, it seeks to answer the following
questions:
74
What are the processes and operations involved in accreditation of programs?
75
What are the supporting documents and forms needed for the accreditation of
programs?
751
What are the problems encountered in the storage and retrieval of the gathered
documents?
What could be the possible solutions for the problems encountered?
752
File archiving. It will assist the management of the tools and documents for
77
accreditation of programs.
753 78 79
File search and sorting. Easily locate documents by searching and sorting in
80 81
order to check the compliance of the tools.
Accreditation. The system provides necessary tools and documents to help the
users evaluate the uploaded supporting documents.
Reports generation. The system can generate graphical reports for the user's
756
decision support.
757
82
File archiving. This is the process of archiving les needed for the internal
accreditation processes of programs.
752
83
Accreditation. This is the process of determining the standard of a program by
754 84 85
checking the compliances provided. In this module, the end user will check all
755
the supporting documents uploaded with the guide of accreditation tools,
86
provide ratings using the SSR Auto-Compute forms and calculate its summary
87
of weighted mean using Weighted Mean Calculator.
88
Acquisition. This includes the recording of ratings of accredited programs,
89 90
addition and update of user information and recording of ongoing accreditation
91
level of programs.
753 92 93
Administration. The system requires user's log-in to be authorized to
94,95 96
manipulate data within the system. Data are manipulated to be able to change
user's passwords, add new users and deactivate users' accounts.
97
Centralization. This facilitates a fully integrated accreditation system with
98
modular components and methodology, web-based and provides the speci c
756 99
needs and requirements of Quality Assurance of ce for internal accreditation
processes.
757 Reports. This module shows tabular reports and graphical representation of
data which includes the ongoing accreditation level of programs, number of
100 1
evaluated programs, program's accreditation ratings per area and other reports
102
that the client may demand.
The proposed study will help the Quality Assurance Of ce of BISU – Bilar
effectively by centralizing the internal accreditation processes and providing
752
secure storage for documents needed for internal accreditation.
754
755
Moreover, this proposed study will bring bene t to the following:
QA Director. The Quality Assurance director manually provides tools and SSR
103
auto compute forms to task force and internal accreditors every time they need
104
it. The QA director also manage the archiving of supporting documents in
753 105
preparation for external accreditation and keeps the record of recent
106
accreditations. The proposed system will make the accreditation tools and SSR
107
auto compute forms available to users whenever they need it. It also provides a
108 109
secure storage for all documents needed for accreditation processes.
Deans/Chairpersons. The deans or chairpersons are the accreditors of the
756
internal accreditations. They manually provide ratings to the pile of supporting
documents presented to them by their task force. The proposed system will
110
757 provide accreditation tools and supporting documents to deans during
111 112
accreditations. The ratings are also going to be uploaded to the system and can
113
be modi ed in case of wrong inputs.
114
BISU Personnel. BISU personnel refers to the task force who gather supporting
documents which the accreditors need for internal accreditation. They gather
115
physical documents that the accreditation tools require. The proposed system
751 116
will allow the BISU personnel to upload scanned documents instead of
117,118
gathering physical document. This module provides secure storage for the
119
documents. Academic Institutions. Academic institutions refer to the
120
universities, colleges or educational institutions that grant academic degrees.
752
This study is bene cial to the public higher education institution because it will
serve as a model and basis for their endeavor to computerize their respective
754
internal accreditation processes.
755
121 122
Researchers. This refer to the individuals who conduct academic research. For
123
future researchers and developers, this study provides signi cant contribution
124 125 126
in terms of computerization of accreditations especially on the public higher
education institution. For the researchers of this study, it will enhance their
127
reasoning and analytical abilities, to widen their knowledge in designing and
753 128
system development in preparation for their future job.
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
Development Framework
756
757 Figure 1 below shows the conceptual diagram of the study. It follows the input-
process- output principle. The inputs are coming from the internal accreditors
129 130
which are the college deans who will going to evaluate programs of their
131 132
department and upload the supporting documents. The accreditor will use the
133
tools available on the application as a guide for the accreditation. The
134
evaluated program will be the input. The application will acquire the rating and
135 136
result of the accreditation and will be stored in the database along with the
751
uploaded supporting documents.
754
Figure 2 on the next page shows the overview of the online accreditation
755 137
system of Quality Assurance Of ce. The main ow of the system starts from the
138
task force who must provide the supporting documents obtained from their
139
assigned area. These documents are received by the internal accreditors and
140
will be evaluated. The evaluated programs will be re-evaluated by the Quality
141
Assurance Of ce and stored for the preparation for the external accreditation.
142
The diagram below shows the input-output of the system which demonstrates
753 143 144 145 146
on how the data is processed in order to produce an output.
756
Figure 2. Block Diagram of the Study
757
147
The study will be conducted at the Quality Assurance and Accreditation Center
14
located at BISU – Bilar Campus Zamora, Bilar, Bohol. The subjects of the study
will be the head of the Quality Assurance Of ce and its staff, the task forces
751 149 150
and the accreditors. The task force is a group of instructors who are assigned at
different areas to collect documents required for accreditation. The Quality
Assurance Of ce head, its staff, and the internal accreditors, on the other
hand, are going to be the main clientele of the study.
752
754
Data Collection
755
The developers made a letter request and asked the head of the of ce for
approval. It will be conducted through an interview with the head of the of ce
152
to gather more information about the present processes of internal
153 154 155 156
accreditation. The information that will be provided like the process of how the
753 157 158,159
programs will be evaluated and how the rating should be calculated will be
160 161
done by the of ce and will be written and recorded on a notebook. Document
162 163
review will also be done to further understand and get the needed information.
Some documents like the different tools and SSR auto compute used for
164
accreditations will be reviewed for the development of accreditation processes
756
of the system.
757
165 16
Soft and hard copies of supporting documents will also be examined including
different forms used in recording the programs' level. Observation of the
167 168
present of ce processes will be done to get more oriented and knowledgeable
169
on the current processes.
751 170
To come up with the average weighted mean of the web usability, the weighted
171
mean score (WMS) was computed to evaluate/ assess the usability of the
system as perceived by the respondents using the following formula;
1f1 + 2f2 + 3f3 + 4f4 + 5f5
752
n
754
WMS =
755
Where:
The guide for the interpretation of the results of the system usability is
172
presented below.
751
752
Table 1
Disagree
754
The respondents believe that the system is not usable.
755
1
1.0 – 1.8
Strongly Disagree
173
The respondents strongly con dent that the system is not usable.
753 174 17
The guide for the interpretation of the results of the web usability is presented
below.
Table 2
Interpretative Guide of the Web Usability
756
Weight
Range
757 Description
Interpretation
5
4.3 – 5.0
Excellent
The respondents nd the application to be excellent with regards to web
usability standards.
751
4
3.5 – 4.2
Very Good
The respondents nd the application to be very good with minor
752
inconsistencies and aesthetics.
3
754
2.7 – 3.4
755
Good
The respondents nd the system to be good with non-critical errors causing
176
confusion.
2
1.9 – 2.6
Fair
753 177 178
The respondents nd the system to be fair having serious problems that need
high priority x.
1
1.0 – 1.8
Poor
756 179
The respondents nd the system poor with severe problems.
757
758
A web hosting service is a type of internet hosting that allows individuals and
organizations to make their websites accessible via the World Wide Web. Web
180
host are companies that provide space on a server owned or leased for use as
751 181 182 183
well as providing net connectivity typically in the data center. On the other
184
hand, the implementation is a realization of a technical speci cation or
185
algorithm as a program, software component, or other computer system
through programming and deployment.
752
754
In the hosting and implementation of the system, the developers subscribe for
755 186
a domain and web hosting to be able to upload the database and the web page
for the establishment for testing. The developers were given an account for the
187
connectivity for the developed system and provide hosting for website on
188 189
virtual servers which can be accessed through
http://bisubilar.org/aaccup/login.php.
753
190 191 1
The methodology that will be used is Rapid Application Development (RAD), see
756
759
Figure on the next page. It is a software development methodology that
involves techniques like iterative development and software prototyping.
193
757 Speci cally, software prototyping will be used for this project. Prototyping is
194 195
suitable for gathering functional requirements if the client or customer do
196
not really know what they want and cannot articulate what they want. It is
better to develop a prototype so that the users can have an initial look-see and
758
feel of the present system, thus, making it much easier for users to express
197 198
their needs as well as what they really want. The analysis will take all the
199
pertinent information from the Quality Assurance and Accreditation center.
751 200 201
This information will be combined into a useful description of how the
202 203
information can be used when it is processed.
752
755
204
The following are the tools that will be used in the development of the system:
205
PHP – a widely used general purpose scripting language that is especially
suited for web development for the system.
753
APACHE – the Apache HTTP server commonly referred to as Apache, is a web
760 206
server application notable for playing a key role in the initial growth of the
207
World Wide Web. It was used to host the proposed system.
MySQL – is the world's most popular open-source database, enabling the cost-
208
effective delivery of reliable, high-performance and scalable Web-based and
756
759 209
embedded database applications. It was used in the connectivity of databases
in the programming application of the proposed system.
210
757 WAMMP Server – it is a Windows web development environment tool that
allows creating web applications with Apache, PHP, and MySQL database that
211
can be used to create an application on online viewing and databasing of the
system.
758
761
VS Code – Visual Studio Code or VS Code is a code editor rede ned and
optimized for building and debugging modern web and cloud applications. It is
212 213
used to edit PHP Scripting language, JavaScript, CSS and more.
751
ClickCharts Diagram – ClickChart diagram is a owchart software that allows
the user to easily create a visual representation of a process organization or
other diagram.
752
754
755
753 214
AACCUP. A non-pro t and non-stock accreditation organization that provide
760 215
accreditation for academic institutions.
216
Accreditation. The process of giving approval to the evaluated programs based
on standards of the tools of AACCUP.
Acquisition. A process of acquiring or obtaining data from inputs and storing it
756
759
in the database.
217
Department head. The admin of the system who manages the records and data.
757 He is also the one who provide username and passwords to the other user.
218
External Accreditors. The accreditors from an accrediting agency who visit a
219
certain institution to conduct an accreditation.
220 221
Internal Accreditors. The staffs of BISU- Bilar who evaluates the programs in
758
761
preparation for the external accreditation.
Module. A part of a system that does a speci c job.
222
Programs. Refers to the courses that will be evaluated by the accreditors.
751 223,224
Software. Refers to the applications on a computer that were developed for a
225
certain purpose.
Staff. A group of people who work for an organization or institution.
226 227
System. Refers to a software that accepts inputs, process the inputted data
752 228 229 230
and provide an output from the processed data.
755
Chapter 2
231
PRESENTATION OF FINDINGS, ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION OF DATA
753
760
Bohol Island State University - Bilar Campus is still using the manual processes
232
of internal accreditation of programs. It has the following processes such as
233 234
collection of supporting documents, program accreditation, le keeping and
235 236
record keeping. Taskforce assigned to different areas are responsible for le
756
759
collection. The college deans are responsible for their college's internal
237 238
accreditation processes and the Quality Assurance Director is the one
757 responsible for keeping these evaluated les.
The supporting documents are the documents required by the tools to be rated
751 239
by the accreditors. These les are collected and provided by the taskforce.
They've obtained and collected these les from their respective areas. These
240 241
collected les are going to be evaluated by the accreditors
752
Internal Accreditation
754
755
Accreditation tools and forms needed for accreditations are readily available at
242 243 244
the Quality Assurance Of ce and will be provided by the of ce director to the
245 246
deans. Using the accreditation tools and forms provided, internal accreditors
check the supporting documents provided by the task force and rate them
247 248
accordingly. After rating these supporting documents from area one up to area
753 249
ten, the weighted mean of the ratings is calculated using the provided weighted
760 250 251 252
mean calculator in a form of a MS Excel le.
C. File Archiving
756
759
253 254
757 After accreditation and calculation of weighted mean of the ratings, the
255
evaluated supporting documents are submitted to the Quality Assurance
256
Of ce. The submitted supporting documents are stored and arranged in the
large shelves inside the Quality Assurance Of ce. These documents are kept in
758
761 257,258
individual le organizers and are manually arranged and maintained. These
259 260
stored documents will be used for external accreditation.
751
Record Keeping
752
261
The summary of ratings of each accreditation are also submitted by the
754 262
colleges. These are compiled and kept by the Quality Assurance Of ce director.
755
These will serve as the records of accreditation results and will become the
263
basis of decision making.
753
Figure 4. Contextual Diagram of the Present System.
760
756
759
751
Present Event List
752
754
Figure 5. Collection of Supporting Documents (Event 1).
755
760
757
751
752
755
The present system is still using the manual methods of program evaluation
264
and le keeping which are needed to be improved. Due to this observation, the
753 265
researchers found out that the system needs the following.
760
762 266 2
A system that can be used by all the personnel involved in evaluation processes
.
756
759
An online system that will allow users to have remote access to accreditation
268 269,270
forms, tools and supporting documents which are necessary for program
757 evaluation.
Computerized le archiving that will prevent damage and loss of accreditation
271
forms, tools and supporting documents.
272 273
Secured database that will keep the records of evaluation results, ratings and
758
761 274
users' information.
275
A webpage that will display the information allowed for public viewing.
751
752
Based on the observation and information gathered from the present system,
754 276
the researchers came up with the proposed system entitled "AACCUP Online
755
Accreditation Phases and Procedures of Bohol Island State University Bilar –
277 278
Campus Zamora, Bilar, Bohol" which covers the users administration, online
279
le management, program evaluation processes, record keeping and report
280 281
generation. The system aims to provide an online le storage for evaluation
forms, tools, and supporting documents which must be easy to access during
282 283
program evaluations. The proposed system can be accessed only by authorized
753 284 285
personnel who has been chosen to be part of the program evaluation such as
760 286
the task force, the internal accreditors and the Quality Assurance Of ce
director.
762
756
759
Administration
757
287 288
Aside from the main web page which is intended for public viewing, the system
289 290 291
also comes with a private page which contains the log in module that is absent
292 293
from the main page. On this private page, each of the authorized users must
758
761 294 295 29
enter a valid username and password in order to have an access to the system.
If the system detected that the provided credentials have a match in the
297 298 299 30
database table tb_user, the access will be granted. If no match has been found
751 302
then the access will be denied. The user can only access features and functions
which are allowed for the user's account type. Only the admin can add new
users and provide credentials. Each user can view and download les from
different colleges.
752
754
File Upload
755
When a task force wants to upload the supporting documents gathered from
his/her assigned area, he/she must log in to access the task force account. A
menu in the navigation bar labeled as "Supporting Documents" will display all
303
the supporting documents uploaded when clicked. This page also has a button
753 304
labeled "Upload File" that will provide a modal le upload form when clicked.
760
Here, the task force must provide details of the le he/she wants to upload
763 305 306 307
such as the program, area number, its parameter, its initials and the le itself.
762 308
The le must be in pdf le format or else it will not be available for viewing.
756
759
309 310
Same process of uploading for the admin and accreditor accounts. They just
757 differ on the information required and the extensions. The admin can upload
311 312
evaluation forms and mean calculator in .xlsx le extension while the
313 314
evaluation tools must be uploaded in .pdf le extension. On the other hand,
only the accreditor account can upload the evaluation ratings in pdf form.
758
761
754
File Download
755
317
When a user wants to download a certain uploaded le from the system, the
318
user must log in to the system and explore the system to locate the desired le
319
listed on the data tables. The availability of download button in the data tables
753 320
depends on the account of the user. The admin and accreditor accounts have a
760
download button for the evaluation forms, weighted mean calculator,
763
evaluation tools, the summary of evaluation ratings of the programs under the
762 132 321 322
college where the accreditor belongs and the supporting documents. The task
323 324
force accounts on the other hand are only allowed to download the evaluation
756
759 325
tools and supporting documents.
757
Accreditation
758
761
When the AACCUP accreditation is near, the college deans will act as the
326
internal accreditors that will perform the internal accreditation. To start the
751 327
accreditation using the system, they must log in and click the dropdown menu
labeled as "Evaluation" and click the submenu labeled as "Auto-Compute
328
Evaluation Forms". This page contains all the auto-compute accreditation
132
forms that the accreditor's college has. The accreditors must download the
752
329
form needed for the program evaluation and the weighted mean calculator, a
754 330
MS Excel le that calculates the weighted mean of the ratings.
755
132
After downloading the necessary forms, the accreditor now needs to access the
331 332 132
evaluation tools from Area I to X. To do this, the accreditor must click the
dropdown menu labeled as "Evaluation" and click the submenu labeled as
333
"Evaluation Tools", then nd the tool for the desired area by searching it using
334 132
the provided search box. The accreditor has the freedom to choose whether to
753 335
download or just view the tools by clicking either the download button or the
760
view button.
763
762
756
759 132
After that, the accreditor will look for supporting documents that the
336
evaluation tool is requiring. To access these supporting documents, the
132
757 accreditor must click the menu labeled as "Documents" and click the submenu
337
labeled as "Supporting Documents", then nd the document required by
132
searching it using the provided search box. Again, the accreditor has the
freedom to choose whether to download or just view the tools by clicking either
758
761
the download button or the view button.
751 132
The accreditor must now provide the rating for the supporting document and
repeat the same process until all the required documents got rated. After giving
338
the ratings for all the ten areas, the ratings of each area must be inputted to
the weighted mean calculator downloaded earlier to get the summary of
752
ratings.
754
755
The auto compute evaluation form with ratings must be uploaded after the
339 132
evaluation. To upload, the accreditor must click the dropdown menu labeled as
340 34
"Result & Ratings" then the submenu labeled as "College's Evaluation Ratings"
342 343 344 132
and nally the button labeled as "Submit Evaluation Ratings". The accreditor
345
must now select the program evaluated, choose the auto compute evaluation
346 347 132
form and click submit. After a successful submission, the accreditor will be
753
redirected to another page to proceed in uploading the summary of ratings and
760 348 349
the individual ratings of the ten areas which are all must be in pdf le format.
763 132
The accreditor must provide the weighted mean, the summary of rating in pdf
762 350 351
le format and click "Submit".
756
759
751
Recording
After the accreditors uploaded all the ratings of the evaluations, the
752 360
information will be recorded and stored in the database. The evaluation ratings
361,362 363,364
will be stored in the table tb_eresult. The summary of ratings will be stored in
754 365 366,367
the table tb_result and the area one to ten ratings will be stored in the table
755
tb_ratings. The users can view the list of evaluation ratings by clicking the
menu labeled as "Results and Ratings" and choose among the submenus
368
available. They can even look at the summary of ratings that also serve as a
369 370
score card of the evaluations by clicking the view button placed at the end of
every row in the data tables.
753
760 371
On the other hand, records of all the users are stored at the database table
763 372
tb_user. Only the admin, which is the Of ce Head of the Quality Assurance
762 373
Of ce, can access this information. to access this information, the admin must
374
click the menu labeled as "Users". The page also has buttons that can add new
756
759 375 376
user, edit user's information and delete accounts.
757
758
761
Generation of Reports
751
When the users want to have a printed report of the information on the page
377 378
such as the ratings of evaluations, they can nd a print button located at the
764 379,380
pages that has data tables. These buttons are located at the top right part of
381 382
data tables labeled as "Print" and has a printer icon in it. This button can print
752
383
the data inside the data tables while excluding some unnecessary entities such
754
as columns containing the download and delete buttons.
755
765
Uni ed Modeling Language (UML) use case diagram is a visual tool that uses
753 384 385
actors and use cases to model the functionality of a system. Use cases refers
760 386 387
to the set of actions, services and tasks that the system must perform. This
763 388
allows the developers to understand the system's end users and functions
762
more easily (Sengupta, S., 2006).
756
759
389
Use case diagrams are useful for visualizing a system's technical speci cations
757 that will translate into design choices and implementation goals. They also
assist with identifying any causes that could affect the system. They also
390
provide a good high-level analysis from outside the system
(https://www.smartdraw.com).
758
761
751
Figure 12. Use Case Diagram of the System
764
754
A use case narrative refers to a text-based summary of a use case that could be
755 391
supplemented with decision trees or other easily understood notations. The
392 393 394
de nitions should be written in the user's language, and thus serves as an
395
important communication tool between developers and the target users.
Narratives follow an organized format, typically using a numbered sequence of
steps for the main activity accompanied by preconditions, post-conditions,
765 396
alternative or exception paths, etc. (Igi-global.com).
753
760
763
Table 1. Use Case Narrative – File Upload
762
399
QA Director: Click the "Upload Accreditation Forms" button in SSR Auto-
754
Compute Accreditation Forms page.
755
Success Guarantee
400
System shows an alert message labeled as "Upload Completed" and
401
automatically shows the updated list of SSR auto-compute accreditation
forms.
Main Success Scenario:
765
QA Director: Clicks the menu labeled as "Accreditations" > "SSR Auto-Compute
753
Accreditation Forms" > "Upload Accreditation Forms".
760
QA Director: Fill up the required elds and choose le.
763 402
QA Director: Clicks "Upload" button.
762 403 404
System: Validates and check potential existing le with same program and
level.
756
759
System: Accepts the le and shows a success alert message.
QA Director: Clicks "Okay" button
757 Extensions:
None
Stakeholders
754
QA Director: wants to upload accreditation tools
755
Precondition
405
Required elds must be lled up completely.
406
There should be no other Accreditation Tools with same program and level.
Triggers
407 408
QA Director: Click the "Upload Tools" in Accreditation Tools page.
765
Success Guarantee
753 409
System shows an alert message labeled as "Upload Completed" and
760 410
automatically shows the updated list of accreditation tools.
763
Main Success Scenario:
762
QA Director: Clicks the menu labeled as "Accreditations" > "Accreditation
Tools" > "Upload Tools".
756
759
QA Director: Fill up the required elds and choose le.
411
QA Director: Clicks "Upload" button.
412 413
757 System: Validates and check potential existing le with same program and
level.
System: Accepts the le and shows a success alert message.
QA Director: Clicks "Okay" button
758
761
Extensions:
None
751
Table 3. Use Case Narrative – File Upload
764
File Upload – Weighted Mean Calculator (UC1-C)
Level
752
User Goal
Goal in Context
754
To upload weighted mean calculator
755
Primary Actor
QA Director
Stakeholders
QA Director: wants to upload weighted mean calculator
Precondition
765
There should be no other Weighted Mean.
753
Triggers
760 414 415
QA Director: Click the "Upload Calculator Form" in Weighted Mean Calculator
763
page.
762
Success Guarantee
416 417
System shows an alert message labeled as "Upload Completed".
756
759
Main Success Scenario:
QA Director: Clicks the menu labeled as "Accreditations" > "Weighted Mean
757 Calculator" > "Upload Calculator Form".
418
QA Director: Choose le and clicks "Upload" button.
419
System: Validates and check potential existing le.
System: Accepts the le and shows a success alert message.
758
761
QA Director: Clicks "Okay" button
Extensions:
None
751
User Goal
754
Goal in Context
755
To upload the supporting documents.
Primary Actor
Task Force
Stakeholders
Task Force: wants to upload supporting documents
765
Precondition
753 420
Required elds must be lled up completely.
760
Files must be in pdf or mp4 format only.
763 421
There's should be no les with the same lename.
762
Triggers
422 423
Task Force: Click the "Upload Files" button in Uploaded Supporting Documents
756
759
page.
Success Guarantee
424
757 System shows an alert message labeled as "Upload Completed" and
425
automatically shows the updated list of uploaded supporting documents.
Main Success Scenario:
Task Force Clicks the menu labeled as "Documents" > "Supporting Documents
758
761
You've Uploaded" > "Upload Files".
426
Task Force: Fill up the required elds and choose le.
Task Force: Clicks "Upload" button.
751
System: Validates and check potential existing le with same lename.
System: Accepts the le and shows a success alert message.
764
Task Force: Clicks "Okay" button
Extensions:
752
None
754
Table 5. Use Case Narrative – File Upload
755
753
File Upload – Additional Documents (UC1-F)
760
Level
763
User Goal
762
Goal in Context
To upload the additional documents.
756
759
Primary Actor
Task Force
757 Stakeholders
Task Force: wants to upload additional documents
Precondition
434
Required elds must be lled up completely.
758
761
Files must be in pdf or mp4 format only.
435
There's should be no les with the same lename.
Triggers
751 436 437
Task Force: Click the "Upload Files" button in Additional Documents page.
Success Guarantee
764 438
System shows an alert message labeled as "Upload Completed" and
439
automatically shows the updated list of uploaded additional documents.
752
Main Success Scenario:
Task Force Clicks the menu labeled as "Documents" > "Additional Documents
754
You've Uploaded" > "Upload Files".
755 440
Task Force: Fill up the required elds and choose le.
Task Force: Clicks "Upload" button.
System: Validates and check potential existing le with same lename.
System: Accepts the le and shows a success alert message.
Task Force: Clicks "Okay" button
765
Extensions:
753
None
760
763
Table 7. Use Case Narrative – File Download
762
Success Guarantee
754 443
Download automatically starts right after clicking download button.
755
Main Success Scenario:
Task Force, Internal Accreditor, QA Director: Clicks the menu labeled as
"Accreditation"
Task Force, Internal Accreditor, QA Director: Clicks the "Accreditation Tools"
Task Force, Internal Accreditor, QA Director: Clicks the "Download"
765
System: Download starts.
753
Extensions:
760
None
763
762
Table 8. Use Case Narrative – File Download
756
759
File Download – SSR Auto-Compute Form (UC2-B)
Level
757 User Goal
Goal in Context
To upload the download SSR Auto-Compute Form.
Primary Actor
758
761
Internal Accreditor, QA Director
Stakeholders
Internal Accreditor, QA Director: wants to download SSR auto-compute form.
751
Precondition
None
764
Triggers
444 445
Internal Accreditor, QA Director: Click the "Download" button in SSR Auto-
752
Compute Form page.
Success Guarantee
754 446
Download starts right after clicking download button.
755
Main Success Scenario:
447
Internal Accreditor, QA Director: Clicks the menu labeled as "Accreditation"
Internal Accreditor, QA Director: Clicks the "SSR Auto-Compute Form"
Internal Accreditor, QA Director: Clicks the "Download"
System: Download starts.
765
Extensions:
753
None
760
763
Table 9. Use Case Narrative – File Download
762
Success Guarantee
754 450
Download starts right after clicking download button.
755
Main Success Scenario:
Task Force, Internal Accreditor, QA Director: Clicks the menu labeled as
451
"Documents".
Task Force, Internal Accreditor, QA Director: Clicks the "Supporting
452
Documents".
765 453
Task Force, Internal Accreditor, QA Director: Clicks the "Download".
753
System: Download starts.
760
Extensions:
763
None
762
454
Accreditation – Evaluation and Rating (UC3-A)
757 Level
Medium
Goal in Context
455
To evaluate area and provide ratings.
758
761
Primary Actor
Internal Accreditor
Stakeholders
751 132 456
Internal Accreditor: wants to evaluate area and provide ratings.
Precondition
764
None
Triggers
752
457
Internal Accreditor: Click the "Start Accreditation" submenu in Accreditation
754
menu.
755
Success Guarantee
None
Main Success Scenario:
458
Internal Accreditor: Clicks the menu labeled as "Accreditation".
459
Internal Accreditor: Clicks the "Start Accreditation".
765 460
Internal Accreditor: Select college, program and level.
753
System: SSR auto-compute form download starts.
760 461
Internal Accreditor: Select area and click "Download".
763
System: Accreditation tool download starts.
762 462
Internal Accreditor: Open downloaded SSR auto compute form.
Internal Accreditor: Clicks "View" button to view supporting documents.
756
759
Internal Accreditor: Provide ratings in SSR auto compute form.
Internal Accreditor: Clicks "Relevant Documents" button when done rating the
757 supporting documents.
Internal Accreditor: Provide ratings in SSR auto compute form.
Internal Accreditor: Click "New Accreditation Tools" to evaluate another area.
Internal Accreditor: Clicks menu "Download Mean Calculator" to download
758
761
weighted mean calculator.
Internal Accreditor: Clicks menu "Additional Documents" to view additional
documents.
751
Internal Accreditor: Clicks menu "Quit" when done.
Extensions:
764
None
752
Table 11. Use Case Narrative – Accreditation
754
Accreditation - Submission of Summary of Ratings (UC3-B)
755
Level
User Goal
Goal in Context
463
To submit summary of ratings.
Primary Actor
765
Internal Accreditor
753
Stakeholders
760 132 464
Internal Accreditor: wants to submit summary of ratings.
763
Precondition
762
Must have Summary of Ratings in pdf form.
Triggers
756
759 465
Internal Accreditor: Click the "Submit Summary of Ratings" button in
466
"Summary of Ratings" page.
757 Success Guarantee
467 468
Alert message "Upload completed" pop up and redirect to Area I – X Ratings
page.
Main Success Scenario:
758
761
Internal Accreditor: Clicks the menu labeled as "Summary of Ratings".
469
Internal Accreditor: Clicks the "Submit Summary of Ratings".
Internal Accreditor: Provide required information and the Summary of Ratings
751
in pdf form.
Internal Accreditor: Click "Submit".
764
System: Alert message "Upload completed" pop up and click OK.
Extensions:
752
None
754
Table 12. Use Case Narrative – Accreditation
755
765
Generate Reports – Summary of Weighted Means (UC4-A)
753
Level
760
User Goal
763
Goal in Context
762 477
To present graphical report showing the weighted means of programs in
478 479
speci c level and colleges.
756
759
Primary Actor
QA Director
757 Stakeholders
480
QA Director: wants to present graphical report.
Precondition
None
758
761
Triggers
481
QA Director: Click the "Summary of Ratings" submenu of "Reports" menu.
Success Guarantee
751
The system presents the line graph showing the weighted mean of programs.
Main Success Scenario:
764 482
Internal Accreditor: Clicks the menu labeled as "Reports".
Internal Accreditor: Clicks the submenu labeled as "Summary of Ratings".
752
System: Shows a line graph with all programs with their respective weighted
754
means.
755 483
Internal Accreditor: Select level and college and click "Filter".
System: Shows a line graph with ltered programs with their respective
weighted means.
Extensions:
None
765
753
Table 14. Use Case Narrative – Generate Reports
760
763
Generate Reports – Accreditation by Year (UC4-B)
762
Level
User Goal
756
759
Goal in Context
484
To present graphical report showing the programs accredited at a speci c year
757 with their respective weighted mean.
Primary Actor
QA Director
Stakeholders
758
761 485
QA Director: wants to present graphical report.
Precondition
None
751
Triggers
486
QA Director: Click the "Accreditations by Year" submenu of "Reports" menu.
764
Success Guarantee
487
Shows a bar graph with ltered programs with respective weighted means.
752
Main Success Scenario:
488
Internal Accreditor: Clicks the menu labeled as "Reports".
754
Internal Accreditor: Clicks the submenu labeled as "Accreditations by Year".
755
System: Shows a bar graph with all programs with their respective weighted
means for the current year.
489
Internal Accreditor: Select level and year and click "Filter".
System: Shows a bar graph with ltered programs with their respective
weighted means.
765
Extensions:
753
None
760
763
Table 14. Use Case Narrative – Generate Reports
762
763
Table 15. Use Case Narrative – Administration
762
756
759
Administration – Adding User Account Level (UC5-A)
Level
757 User Goal
Goal in Context
496
To be able to add new user account.
Primary Actor
758
761
QA Director
Stakeholders
497 498
QA Director: wants to add new user account.
751
Precondition
None
764
Triggers
499
QA Director: Click the "Users" submenu of "Others" menu.
752
Success Guarantee
Triggers
754 507
QA Director: Click the "Edit" button under the "Action" button on Users List
755
page.
Success Guarantee
508 509 510
Alert message saying "Update Completed" and system shows updated list of
511
users
Main Success Scenario:
765 512
Internal Accreditor: Clicks the menu labeled as "Others".
753 513
Internal Accreditor: Clicks the submenu labeled as "Users".
760
Internal Accreditor: Select user, click "Action" and select "Edit".
763
Internal Accreditor: Edit user information.
762
Internal Accreditor: Click "Save".
System: Alert message saying "Update Completed".
756
759
Internal Accreditor: Click "Ok".
System: System shows updated list of users.
757 Extensions:
None
Table 16. Use Case Narrative – Administration
758
761
Administration – Deactivate/Activate User Account Level (UC5-C)
Level
User Goal
751
Goal in Context
To be able to deactivate/active user account.
764
Primary Actor
QA Director
752
Stakeholders
514
QA Director: wants to deactivate/active user account.
754
Precondition
755
None
Triggers
QA Director: Click the "Activate" or "Deactivate" button under the "Action"
515
button on Users List page.
Success Guarantee
765 516 517
System shows updated list of users.
753
Main Success Scenario:
760 518
Internal Accreditor: Clicks the menu labeled as "Others".
763 519
Internal Accreditor: Clicks the submenu labeled as "Users".
762
Internal Accreditor: Select user, click "Action" and select "Activate" or
"Deactivate".
756
759
System: System shows a modal message asking for con rmation.
520
Internal Accreditor: Click "Yes".
757 System: System shows updated list of users.
Extensions:
None
758
761
Database Design
751
critical part of the system development because it will serve as the storage of
754
the data needed for the system to function.
755
Database Structure
765
The following tables below are going to be the system's database tables which
753 523
are going to be the storage of the information provided by the users.
760
763
762
Table 1
93
Data Structure for the System User Login
756
759
Field
Field Names
757 Type
Width
Description
1
758
761
2
3
4
751
5
6
764
766
7
8
752
9
10
754
11
755
id
524
fname
525
mname
526
lname
type
765 527
areano
753
col
760
address
763
contact
762
user
pass
756
759
Int
Varchar
757 Varchar
Varchar
Varchar
Varchar
758
761
Varchar
Varchar
Varchar
751
Varchar
Varchar
764
766
11
30
752
30
30
754
40
755
10
10
50
15
20
765
20
753 528
Primary key id
760
User's rst name
763
User's middle name
762
User's last name
User type
756
759
Taskforce's area
User's college
757 User's address
User's contact number
User's username
User's password
758
761
Table 2
Data Structure for the Supporting Documents Upload
751
Field
Field Names
764
766
Type
Width
752
Description
1
754
2
755
3
4
5
6
7
765
8
753
9
760
10
763
11
762
12
id
756
759
lenames
uploaded
757 size
529
areano
prog
col
758
761
para
530
ini
531
sy
751
matrix
letype
764
766
Int
Varchar
752
Datetime
Int
754
Varchar
755
Varchar
Varchar
Varchar
Varchar
Varchar
765
Varchar
753
Varchar
760
11
763
30
762
30
756
759
40
10
757 10
5
10
10
758
761
200
10
532
Primary key id
751
Filename
Timestamp of upload
764
766
File's size
File's area
752
Program it belongs
College it belongs
754
File's parameter
755
Initial given
School year
File's matrix
File type (pdf or mp4)
765
Table 3
753
Data Structure for the Evaluation Forms Upload
760
Field
763
Field Names
762
Type
Width
756
759
Description
1
757 2
3
4
5
758
761
id
533
evaname
size
751
prog
col
764
766
Int
Varchar
752
Int
Varchar Varchar
754
11
755
100
11
10
10
534
Primary key id
765
Filename
753
File's size
760
Program it belongs
763
College it belongs
762
Table 4
756
759
Data Structure for the Evaluation Tools Upload
Field
757 Field Names
Type
Width
Description
758
761
1
2
3
751
4
5
764
766
6
id
752 535
toolname
size
754 536
areano
755
prog
col
Int
Varchar
Int
765
Varchar
753
Varchar Varchar
760
11
763
50
762
11
10
756
759
10
10
537
757 Primary key id
Filename
File's size
File's area
758
761
Program it belongs
College it belongs
751
Table 5
538
Data Structure for the Evaluation Ratings Upload
764
766
Field
Field Names
752
Type
Width
754
Description
755
1
2
3
4
5
765
6
753
id
760 539
evaname
763 540
evadate
762
evaluator
prog
756
759
col
Int
757 Varchar
Varchar
Varchar
Varchar Varchar
758
761
11
100
25
751
60
10
764
766
10
541
Primary key id
752
Filename
Evaluation date
754
Evaluator's name
755
Program it belongs
College it belongs
Table 6
Data Structure for the College Registration
765
Field
753
Field Names
760
Type
763
Width
762
Description
1
756
759
2
3
757 id
542
coname
543
coac
Int
758
761
Varchar
Varchar
11
751
100
6
764
766 544
Primary key id
College name
752
College acronym
754
755
Table 7
Data Structure for the Evaluation Ratings by Area Upload
Field
Field Names
Type
765
Width
753
Description
760
1
763
2
762
3
4
756
759
5
6
757 7
8
id
545
evaname
758
761 546
evadate
547
areano
prog
751
col
rating
764
766
remarks
Int
752
Varchar
Varchar
754
Varchar
755
Varchar Varchar
Double
Varchar
11
100
765
20
753
10
760
10
763
10
762
15
756
759 548
Primary key id
Filename
757 Evaluation date
File's area
Program it belongs
College it belongs
758
761
Area' rating
Area remarks
751
Table 8
Data Structure for the Summary of Ratings Upload
764
766
Field
Field Names
752
Type
Width
754
Description
755
1
2
3
4
5
765
6
753
7
760
8
763
id
762 549
evaname
550
evadate
756
759
evaluator
prog
757 col
rating
remarks
Int
758
761
Varchar
551
datetime
Varchar
751
Varchar Varchar
Double
764
766
Varchar
11
752
100
754
60
755
10
10
15
552
Primary key id
765
Filename
753
Evaluation date
760
File's area
763
Program it belongs
762
College it belongs
Area' rating
756
759
Area remarks
757 Table 9
Data Structure for the Program Registration
Field
Field Names
758
761
Type
Width
Description
751
1
2
764
766
3
4
752
id
program
754
acro
755
colleges
Int
Varchar
Varchar
Varchar
765
11
753
100
760
8
763
10
762 553
Primary key id
Program name
756
759
Program acronym
College it belongs
757
Class Diagram
758
761
751
Figure 10. Class Diagram of the Proposed System.
764
766
Program Hierarchy
752
Program hierarchy is a chart that shows the arrangement of menus for the
754 554
different module accessible in a system in a hierarchical way. It's a simple
755
chart that shows the breakdown of the system's functions.
765
753
760
763
Functional Requirements
762
756
759 555
Functional requirements refer to the features or function of the system that the
developers need to implement so users can accomplish their tasks. It also
556
757 describes the behavior of the system during a certain situation or condition. It
557 558
can be computations, technical information, data control and handling and
other explicit functionalities that characterize what a system should achieve.
758
761
559 560
The functionalities mentioned are based from the existing standard
requirements of the information system with the approval and coordination
751
from the respondents as follows.
764
766
Access to the system
FREQ 1: The access to the system must be password protected.
752
Accreditation
751 576
FREQ 10: The system should allow the evaluators to have access to les and
tools needed to perform the evaluation.
764
766 577
FREQ 11: The system should allow the evaluators to submit evaluation ratings
578,579 580
and its summaries after a successful evaluation.
752
Record Keeping
581
FREQ 12: The system should allow the users to have access on the list of
754
evaluation results and ratings from different programs and colleges
755
FREQ 13: The system should allow the admin to have access to the information
records of the registered end users.
Reports
58
FREQ 14: The system should allow the users to have a printed copy of a certain
765 584,585
information from the system which is accessible and allowed to be printed on
753
their accounts
760
763
762
Administration
FREQ 15: The system should allow the admin to provide valid credentials for a
756
759
chosen end user.
FREQ 16: The system should allow the admin to manage the accounts of the
586
757 end users.
767
Non-functional requirements de ne how a system is supposed to be and in the
751 587 588
form of "the system should be", in contrast of the functional requirements
589 590,591
which is in the form of "the system should do". In other words, it de nes the
764
766
general characteristics or qualities of the resulting system.
752
592 593
The system should operate on all types of operating system as long as it has an
754 594
internet access.
755
The system must be user-friendly.
Test Cases
765
753
A test case is a bunch of directions on how to certify a speci c test objective,
760 595 596
which when followed will show us if the expected response of the system is
763 597 598 599
ful lled or not. It has components that de ne input, action and an expected
762 600 601 602
response , in order to decide if a feature of an application is working properly
603 604
.
756
759
757 These are the test case scenarios conducted during the acceptance testing.
605
The test plan is to let the users use the system and follow the instruction in
606
each test case of the proposed system. The system should perform the
607
expected result in each test case in order to be considered successful.
758
761
The following are the details of each test case:
767
751
Technical Requirements
764
766
608 609
Appropriate software and hardware components selection is necessary as well
752 610 611 612 613
as the selection and identi cation of the end users of the system. This is
614 615
needed so the system could perform its function properly and for its proper
754
usage.
755
616
The software or computer software is the general term that characterizes
617,618 619
computer programs which are needed to make the computer functionable. It is
620 621
also de ned as set of instructions or lines of codes written by software
765 622 623
developers that have been compiled to become a computer program. A
753 624
computer without a software is useless. Computer software must be accurate,
760 625 626
ef cient and user friendly.
763
762
758
761 635
Peopleware refers to the individual who will operate computer and use the
software. It also includes all the individuals involved in the system's processes.
767 636
These individuals should be computer literate and capable of operating the
751
system's modules to manipulate data and have an effective and ef cient
result.
764
766
752
754
Minimum Hardware Speci cations:
755
637
This covers the minimum hardware speci cations of the computer for the
638,639
system to function properly as intended and expected. The following
speci cations are considered based on their availability in the market and what
765 640
most computer package system offers.
753
760
Components
763
Speci cation
762
Microprocessor
Hard Disk Drive
756
759
Random Access Memory
Internet/Wi-Fi Router
757 Intel Celeron
120 gigabytes
1 gigabyte, DDR2
2.4 GHz band, Wireless/LAN
758
761
751
641
This covers the minimum speci cations of software required for the system to
764
766 642
function properly.
Item
752
Speci cation
Operating System
754
Web Browser
755
Microsoft Excel
PDF Reader
Windows 7
Any internet browser
Version 2010 – present
765
Any PDF Reader
753
760
763
Hosting and Implementation
762
756
759
In the hosting and implementation of the system, the developers subscribe for
643
a domain and web hosting to be able to upload the database and the web page
757 for the establishment for testing. The developers were given an account for the
connectivity for the developed system and provide hosting for websites on
644 645
virtual servers which can be accessed through
http://bisubilar.org/aaccup/login.php.
758
761
Economic Performance Evaluation
767
751
In any project, analysis is one of the crucial parts of any system and design
646
project. This includes the calculation of the expected cost that the developed
764
766 647
system needs as well as the bene ts that it gives. It takes for the new system
to generate the cost-saving to cover its development, and expenses are
752
determined. This section determines the proposed budget of resources that
648
will be used. Furthermore, it will give them the idea of whether to proceed with
754
computerization or not.
755
Items
Qty
765
Unit
753
Unit Price
760
Total
763
A. Hardware
762
Computer Package
1
756
759
Set
₱ 15,000.00
757 ₱ 15,000.00
Printer
1
Piece
758
761
₱ 7,500.00
₱ 7,500.00
767
Internet Service Provider
751
1
Piece
764
766
₱ 12,000.00
₱ 12,000.00
752
B. Software
Software Development
754
1
755
Lot
₱ 10,000.00
₱ 10,000.00
753
760
C. Software
763
762
Internet
12
756
759
Month
₱ 1,300.00
757 ₱ 12,000.00
₱ 6,000.00
767
D. General Services
751
764
766
752
System Maintenance
4
754
Quarter
755
₱ 1,500.00
₱ 6,000.00
765
753
760
763
762
757 Business intelligence (BI) is a method of sorting and selecting relevant data
649
from a large amount of information. BI offers valuable information that assist
companies in making the best decisions possible (Rostami, 2014).
Furthermore, integrating datasets across an organization presents its own set
758
761 650
of challenges. It is a collection of theories, research methods, procedures,
architectures, and technologies that convert unstructured data into useful
767
information.
751
764
766
The developed system can analyze data and generate graphical reports.
Automated representation of processed data allows real-time data
752
651 652
presentation. These graphical reports are useful for the admin's decision
754
making especially in determining what programs need improvements.
755
653
The previews show graphical representation of collected data with business
654 655
intelligence capability. These data were based from the data inputted to the
system provided by the client. It covers areas such as graph report showing the
765
ongoing level of the programs, graph report showing the summary of weighted
753 656
means of all programs or programs under the selected college and the
760 657
graphical report showing programs evaluated based on the selected year with
763 658
their respective weighted mean.
762
756
759
Screen Layout
757
659
One of the many qualities of the system's user friendliness is its screen layout.
660
It was designed in a way that the users can navigate the system quickly and
661
easily. The system's screen layout provides a clear recognition of the user's
758
761
required task.
767
Testing and Evaluation
751
764
766 662
Software testing is a way of nding out whether software is working as it
663
should; giving the correct output, working fast enough, handling expected
752 664 665 666
loads responding to user inputs properly. Its also a process of determining how
System Usability
765
753
The system usability test adopted the questionnaire created by Lewis, J.R.
760 671
(1995). The test was conducted at the Bohol Island State University Bilar
763
Campus on April 14 -15, 2021. The researchers visited the end users' of ces to
762
present the system and demonstrate modules in detail like the uploading of
documents, downloading of evaluation forms and tools, accreditation
756
759 672 673
processes and submission of accreditation ratings. The presentation and the
answering of questions took two (2) days to complete. After every presentation,
674
757 the respondents were requested to rate the system usability questionnaire.
Based on the result, the average weighted mean of the usability questionnaire
758
761 675
is 6.12 with the interpretation of – Agree. This indicates that the system has
676
high usability rating indicating the acceptability of the system to the end users
767 677 678
.
751
Table 10
Summary of respondents of the System Usability
764
766
N=17
Respondents
752
No of Respondents
Internal Accreditors
754
Task Force
755
QA Director
6
10
1
765
Table 11
753
System Usability Result
760
N=17
763
Criteria for System Usability
762
Weighted
Mean
756
759
Interpretation
768
Overall, I am satis ed with how easy it is to use this system.
757 It was simple to use this system.
769
I can effectively complete my work using this system.
679
I am able to complete my work quickly using this system.
680 681
I am able to ef ciently complete my work using this system.
758
761
770
I feel comfortable using this system.
It was easy to learn to use this system.
767
I believe I became productive quickly using this system.
771
751 682
The system gives error messages that clearly tell me how to x problems.
772
Whenever I make a mistake using the system, I recover easily and quickly.
764
766
The information (such as online help, on-screen messages, and other
documentation) provided with this system is clear.
773
752
It is easy to nd the information I needed.
760
6.0
763
5.9
762
5.8
756
759
768
5.9
757
769
6.1
6.2
6.2
758
761
770
5.7
767
771
751
6.1
772
764
766
6.3
773
752
6.6
754
774
6.5
755
6.1
775
6.4
765
6.6
753
6.3
760
6.0
763
762
6.4
Agree
756
759
768
Agree
757 Agree
769
Agree
758
761
770
Agree
767
Agree
771
751
Agree
772
Agree
764
766
Agree
773
752
Agree
754
774
755
Agree
775
Strongly Agree
Strongly Agree
765
753
Agree
760
763
Strongly Agree
762
Strongly Agree
756
759
Agree
768
Agree
757
769
Strongly Agree
AVERAGE WEIGHTED MEAN
6.12
758
761
770
Agree
767
Web Usability
771
751
772
764
766 683
The program was demonstrated at the Bohol Island State University Bilar
684
Campus. The internal accreditors, task force and the Quality Assurance Of ce
773
752 685 686
director rated the functionality, ease of use and the consistency of the program.
754
774
755
Table 12
775
Summary of respondents of the Web Usability
N=17
765
753
Respondents
760
No of Respondents
763
Internal Accreditors
762
Task Force
QA Director
756
759
6
768
10
757 1
769
758
761
770
Table 13
Web Usability Result
767
N=17
771
751
Web Usability Criteria
772
Weighted
764
766
Mean
Description
773
752
I. Navigation
4.60
754
774
Excellent
755 687 688
1.1 Current location within the site is shown clearly.
689 690
1.2 Link to the site's main page is clearly identi ed.
775 691
1.3 Major/important parts of the site are directly accessible from the main
page.
692
1.4 Easy to use Search function is provided, as needed.
765
1.5 Site accommodates novice to expert users.
753
4.70
760
4.60
763
4.40
762
4.70
756
759
768
4.60
757 Excellent
769
Excellent
Excellent
758
761
770
Excellent
767
Excellent
771
751
II. Functionality
772
4.50
764
766
Excellent
2.2 Functions are clearly labeled.
773
752
2.2 Essential functions are available without leaving the site.
693 694
2.3 Plug-ins are used only if they add value
754
774
4.60
755
4.40
775
4.50
Excellent
Excellent
765
753
Excellent
760
III. User Control
763
4.60
762
Excellent
3.1 Site re ects user's work ow.
756
759
3.2 User can cancel any operation.
768 695
3.3 Clear exit point is provided on every page.
757 3.4 Per page loads moderately to accommodate slow connections.
769
3.5 Currently used browser is supported.
4.60
4.70
758
761
770
4.70
4.40
767
771
751
4.60
772
Excellent
764
766
Excellent
Excellent
773
752
Excellent
754
774
Excellent
755
IV. Language and Content
4.70
775
Excellent
696
4.1 Important information and tasks are given prominence.
697
4.2 Information of low relevance or rarely used information is not included.
765
4.3 Related information or tasks are grouped: on the same page or menu or in
753
the same area within
760
a page.
763
4.4 Language is simple, without jargon.
762
4.5 Paragraphs are brief.
698
4.6 Links are concise, expressive, and visible—not buried in text.
756
759
4.7 Terms are de ned.
768
4.70
757
769
4.40
4.60
758
761
770
767
4.60
771
751
4.60
772
4.50
764
766
4.60
773
752
Excellent
754
774
Excellent
755
Excellent
775
Excellent
765
Excellent
753
Excellent
760
763
Excellent
762
V. Online Help and User Guides
4.30
756
759
Excellent
768 699
5.1 It is always clear what is happening on the site - - visual hints, etc.
757 5.2 Users can receive email feedback if necessary.
769 700
5.3 Con rmation screen is provided for form submittal.
5.4 All system feedback is timely.
5.5 Users are informed if a plug-in or browser version is required.
758
761
770
5.6 Each page includes a "last updated" date.
4.30
767
771
751
4.10
772
4.30
764
766
4.40
773
752
4.10
754
774
4.70
755
Excellent
775
Very Good
Excellent
765
Excellent
753
Very Good
760
763
Excellent
762
VI. Consistency
4.50
756
759
Excellent
768
6.1 The same word or phrase is used consistently to describe an item.
757 6.2 Link re ects the title of the page to which it refers.
769 701
6.3 Browser page title is meaningful and re ects main page heading.
4.60
758
761
770
4.50
767
4.40
771
751
Excellent
772
764
766
Excellent
773
752
Excellent
4.50
756
759
768
4.60
757
769
4.60
4.60
4.50
758
761
770
4.50
767
Excellent
771
751
772
Excellent
764
766
Excellent
773
752
Excellent
754
774
Excellent
755
Excellent
775
Excellent
VIII. Architectural and Visual Clarity
4.51
765
Excellent
753 702
8.1 Site is organized from the user's perspective.
760
8.2 Site is easily scannable for organization and meaning.
763
8.3 Site design and layout are redundant only when required for user
762
productivity.
8.4 White space is suf cient; pages are not too dense.
756
759 703
8.5 Unnecessary animation is avoided.
768
8.6 Colors used for visited and unvisited links are easily seen and understood.
704
757 8.7 Bold and italic text is used sparingly.
769
4.50
4.70
758
761
770
4.50
767
771
751
4.40
772
764
766
4.70
4.50
773
752
4.30
754
774
Excellent
755
Excellent
775
Excellent
765
Excellent
753
760
Excellent
763
Excellent
762
Excellent
756
759
AVERAGE WEIGHTED MEAN
768
4.53
757 Excellent
769
705
The average weighted mean is 4.53 with the interpretation of Excellent. This
706
implies that the end users of the system found the application usable during
758
761
770
internal accreditation.
Chapter 3
767 707
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
771
751
772
764
766
Summary of Findings
773
752
776
After a thorough study of the present system, the researchers found out that
754
774 708 709
the present system uses a manual method which results to problems such as
755 710
dif culty in storing, retrieving and updating evaluation tools and supporting
711 712
documents, time consuming evaluation processes, unsecured data and le
775 713
storage and limited access of the internal accreditors to evaluation tools. There
is a need to secure data and information of the evaluation results and ratings,
online computerized operation of storing evaluation tools and supporting
765 714
documents to prevent loss and misplacement of les as well as the availability
753 715
of tabular and graphical reports.
760
763
762
Based on the needs identi ed, the AACCUP Online: Centralized Accreditation
716
System was developed with the modules of online mechanism, le
756
759 717
management, administration, program evaluation processes and reports. The
768 718 719
developed system was pilot tested and survey was conducted to the web users
757 to rate the developed system according to the system usability questionnaire.
769 720 721 722
The average weighted mean is 6.12 which is interpreted as "Agree". The
interpretation means that the respondents believed and con dent that the
723
system is usable. Meanwhile, the average weighted mean of the web usability
758
761
770 724 725 726
is 4.53 which interpreted as Excellent. This means that the respondents nd
the application satisfying and easy to use.
767
771
751
772
Conclusions
764
766
773
752
777
776
Based on the ndings of the study, the developers had concluded that the
754
774
present system of internal accreditation of BISU – Bilar adopts the manual
755 727 728
processes that resulted to related problems which can be resolved through
729 730 731
computerization. With the assessment of the existing operation particularly on
775
evaluation processes and le management, computerization is possible and
achievable.
765
753 732
With the functional assessment of the AACCUP Online Centralized
760
Accreditation System of Bohol Island State University – Bilar Campus, the
763
capability and features of the system had met the expectations of the users to
762 733
improve the internal evaluation processes.
756
759
768
Recommendation
757
769
734
Based on the conclusions, it is highly recommended that the developed system
735
should be implemented. For a successful implementation of the developed
758
761
770 736
system, the following recommendations should be taken:
767
771
751
Purchase a domain and web hosting to increase the dynamic features that may
772 737 738 739 740
incorporate in the system especially in the amount of data storage.
764
766 741 742
Training and orientation seminars must be conducted to the end users to
743
familiarize and be oriented with the features and operation of the newly
773
752
developed system.
777
776 744 745
Regular system maintenance must be done to ensure security of uploaded les
754
774
and records of the system.
755 746 747,748 749,750
Errors and bugs must be reported so immediate solution will be applied
775
765
753
760
763
762
756
759
768
757
769
758
761
770
767
771
751
772
764
766
773
752
777
776
1. to Wordy sentences Clarity
754
774
755
2. important → essential Word choice Engagement
753
6. it's located Passive voice misuse Clarity
760
7. , and Punctuation in Correctness
763 compound/complex sentences
762
8. and it → . It Hard-to-read text Clarity
756
759
9. is evaluated Passive voice misuse Clarity
757
11. on → in Wrong or missing prepositions Correctness
769
773
752
17. come-up → come up Confused words Correctness
77718.
776 come-up with → develop Wordy sentences Clarity
754
774
19. State; state Text inconsistencies Correctness
755
75322.
Universities and state colleges must Wordy sentences Clarity
760
23. universities and state colleges Passive voice misuse Clarity
763 should be incorporated
762
24. up → with Wrong or missing prepositions Correctness
769
26. Basic → Fundamental Word choice Engagement
75828.
761
770 , which Punctuation in Correctness
compound/complex sentences
771
751
30. a database Determiner use (a/an/the/this, Correctness
772
etc.)
76431.
766 are generated Passive voice misuse Clarity
777
776
34. concurrently Misplaced words or phrases Correctness
754
774
35. Rules, methods, design Passive voice misuse Clarity
755 methodologies and theories to
maintain the consistency of the
components operating concurrently
775
was also provided
763
39. a good Determiner use (a/an/the/this, Correctness
762 etc.)
75844.
761
770
a proper Determiner use (a/an/the/this, Correctness
etc.)
764
766
47. tasks → studies Word choice Engagement
77749.
776 Some related studies are Wordy sentences Clarity
754
774
50. were used Passive voice misuse Clarity
755
77061.
758
761 certain → particular, speci c Word choice Engagement
777
776
65. a using Determiner use (a/an/the/this, Correctness
754
774
etc.)
757
73. The main aim of this study is to Unclear sentences Clarity
769 develop and implement a centralized
accreditation system for BISU – Bilar
that will have available tools needed
for the accreditation of programs.
75874.
761
770 the accreditation Determiner use (a/an/the/this, Correctness
etc.)
771
75176.
is developed Passive voice misuse Clarity
772
77. the accreditation Determiner use (a/an/the/this, Correctness
764
766 etc.)
777
776
80. in order to → to Wordy sentences Clarity
754
774
81. tools → devices Word choice Engagement
755
775
83. This Intricate text Clarity
753
86. , and Comma misuse within clauses Correctness
760
87. the weighted Determiner use (a/an/the/this, Correctness
763 etc.)
762
88. This Intricate text Clarity
94.
772
are manipulated Passive voice misuse Clarity
76495.
766 manipulated → Word choice Engagement
used, driven, controlled, managed
75296.
773 to be able Wordy sentences Clarity
777
776
98.
754
774
, and Comma misuse within clauses Correctness
100.
775 , and Comma misuse within clauses Correctness
102.
753 This module shows tabular reports Unclear sentences Clarity
and graphical representation of data
760 which includes the ongoing
accreditation level of programs,
763 number of evaluated programs,
program's accreditation ratings per
762
area and other reports that the client
may demand.
103.
756
759 the task Determiner use (a/an/the/this, Correctness
etc.)
768
104.
757 manage → manages Faulty subject-verb agreement Correctness
769
105. the record → a record Determiner use (a/an/the/this, Correctness
etc.)
107.
771
751
it → them Pronoun use Correctness
108.
772 a secure Determiner use (a/an/the/this, Correctness
etc.)
764
766
110.
777
776 provide → offer Word choice Engagement
754
774
111. are also going to → Wordy sentences Clarity
755 will also
765
115. documents → copies Word choice Engagement
753
116. documents → copies Word choice Engagement
760
117.
763 document → Word choice Engagement
form, paper, record, copy
762
119.
756
759 documents → records Word choice Engagement
768
120. , or Comma misuse within clauses Correctness
757
121.
769 This Intricate text Clarity
777
776 will enhance their reasoning and
analytical abilities, to widen their
754
774 knowledge in designing and system
development in preparation for their
755
future job.
131.
765 The inputs are coming from the Unclear sentences Clarity
internal accreditors which are the
753 college deans who will going to
evaluate programs of their
760 department and upload the
supporting documents.
763
132.
762 accreditor; accreditor's; Accreditor Text inconsistencies Correctness
768
134. evaluated → estimated Word choice Engagement
757
135. accreditation → certi cation Word choice Engagement
769
139.
771
751 are received Passive voice misuse Clarity
772
140. be evaluated Passive voice misuse Clarity
764
766
141. for the preparation → Wordy sentences Clarity
to prepare
773
752
142. , which Punctuation in Correctness
compound/complex sentences
777
776
143. on Wrong or missing prepositions Correctness
754
774
144.
755 is processed Passive voice misuse Clarity
147.
753 be conducted Passive voice misuse Clarity
760
148. study subjects Wordy sentences Clarity
763
149.
762 , and Comma misuse within clauses Correctness
153.
769 It will be conducted through an Unclear sentences Clarity
interview with the head of the of ce
to gather more information about the
present processes of internal
accreditation.
758
761
770
155.
767 , like Punctuation in Correctness
compound/complex sentences
771
751
156.
772 the process of Wordy sentences Clarity
764
766
157. the programs will be evaluated Passive voice misuse Clarity
777
776 compound/complex sentences
754
774
160. be done Passive voice misuse Clarity
755
162.
775 be done Passive voice misuse Clarity
165.
753 Soft and hard copies of supporting Passive voice misuse Clarity
documents will also be examined
760
166.
763 , including Punctuation in Correctness
compound/complex sentences
762
168.
756
759 Observation of the present of ce Passive voice misuse Clarity
processes will be done
768
169.
757 processes → techniques Word choice Engagement
769
170. To come up with the average Misplaced words or phrases Correctness
weighted mean of the web usability
173.
767 respondents are, or Incorrect verb forms Correctness
771
respondents were
751
174.
772 the web Determiner use (a/an/the/this, Correctness
etc.)
764
766
773
752
176. causing confusion → Wordy sentences Clarity
confusing
777
776
177. , having Punctuation in Correctness
754
774 compound/complex sentences
755
178. serious → severe Word choice Engagement
184.
768 is a realization of → Wordy sentences Clarity
realizes
757
185.
769 another computer system, Determiner use (a/an/the/this, Correctness
other computer systems etc.)
758
761
770
187. the website Determiner use (a/an/the/this, Correctness
etc.)
767
188. , which Punctuation in Correctness
compound/complex sentences
771
751
189.
772 can be accessed Passive voice misuse Clarity
764
766
190. that will be Wordy sentences Clarity
777
776 compound/complex sentences
754
774
193. be used Passive voice misuse Clarity
755
195.
775 do → does Faulty subject-verb agreement Correctness
198.
753 It is better to develop a prototype so Unclear sentences Clarity
that the users can have an initial
760 look-see and feel of the present
system, thus, making it much easier
763
for users to express their needs as
762 well as what they really want.
769
202. information → data Word choice Engagement
204.
770
758
761 will be used Passive voice misuse Clarity
206.
771
751 key → vital, pivotal Word choice Engagement
772
207. It was used Passive voice misuse Clarity
764
766
209.
773
752 It was used Passive voice misuse Clarity
210.
777
776 WAMMP → WAMP Misspelled words Correctness
754
774
211. be used Passive voice misuse Clarity
755
213.
775 , and Comma misuse within clauses Correctness
218.
756
759 who Pronoun use Correctness
768
219. certain → particular, speci c Word choice Engagement
757
220. staffs → staff Incorrect noun number Correctness
769
222. Refers to the courses that will be Passive voice misuse Clarity
758
761
770 evaluated by the accreditors.
225.
772 certain → particular, speci c Word choice Engagement
764
766
226. a software Determiner use (a/an/the/this, Correctness
etc.)
227.
773
752 process → processes Faulty subject-verb agreement Correctness
228.
777
776 , and Comma misuse within clauses Correctness
754
774
229. provide → provides Faulty subject-verb agreement Correctness
755
232.
765 processes → Word choice Engagement
methods, functions, procedures,
753
operations
760
233. a collection, or the collection Determiner use (a/an/the/this, Correctness
763 etc.)
762
234. , and Comma misuse within clauses Correctness
238.
758
761
770 the one Wordy sentences Clarity
241.
772 accreditors. Closing punctuation Correctness
764
766
242. will be Wordy sentences Clarity
777
776
245. forms → conditions Word choice Engagement
754
774
246. Using the accreditation tools and Misplaced words or phrases Correctness
755
forms provided
252.
762 a MS → an MS Determiner use (a/an/the/this, Correctness
etc.)
253.
756
759
the weighted Determiner use (a/an/the/this, Correctness
etc.)
768
254. of the Wordy sentences Clarity
757
255.
769 are submitted Passive voice misuse Clarity
261.
777
776 are → is Faulty subject-verb agreement Correctness
754
774
262. The summary of ratings of each Passive voice misuse Clarity
755 accreditation are also submitted by
the colleges.
263.
775 decision making → Misspelled words Correctness
decision-making
265.
765 needs → requires Word choice Engagement
753
266. be used Passive voice misuse Clarity
760
267. A system that can be used by all the Incomplete sentences Correctness
763
personnel involved in evaluation
762 processes
769
271. , and Comma misuse within clauses Correctness
273.
770
758
761 , and Comma misuse within clauses Correctness
274. Secured database that will keep the Incomplete sentences Correctness
767
records of evaluation results, ratings
and users' information
771
751
275. A webpage that will display the Incomplete sentences Correctness
772
information allowed for public
764
766
viewing
777
776
278. users → user's, users' Incorrect noun number Correctness
754
774
279.
755
, and Comma misuse within clauses Correctness
285.
769 , such Punctuation in Correctness
compound/complex sentences
758
761
770
287. , which Punctuation in Correctness
compound/complex sentences
288.
767 is intended Passive voice misuse Clarity
771
751
289. which contains → that contains Pronoun use Correctness
772
290.
764
766
log in → login Misspelled words Correctness
292. Aside from the main web page which Unclear sentences Clarity
777
776 is intended for public viewing, the
system also comes with a private
754
774 page which contains the log in
module that is absent from the main
755
page.
753
296. On this private page, each of the Unclear sentences Clarity
authorized users must enter a valid
760
username and password in order to
763 have an access to the system.
762
297. access → permit, entry, visa, key Word choice Engagement
299.
768 the access will be granted Passive voice misuse Clarity
300.
757 been found Passive voice misuse Clarity
769
301. found, Punctuation in Correctness
compound/complex sentences
304.
772
clicked → connected Word choice Engagement
305.
764
766 , such Punctuation in Correctness
compound/complex sentences
306.
773
752 , and Comma misuse within clauses Correctness
307. Here, the task force must provide Unclear sentences Clarity
777
776 details of the le he/she wants to
upload such as the program, area
754
774 number, its parameter, its initials
and the le itself.
755
310.
765 Same process of uploading for the Incomplete sentences Correctness
admin and accreditor accounts.
753
769
315. , and Punctuation in Correctness
compound/complex sentences
318.
767 system → design Word choice Engagement
771
751
319. the download Determiner use (a/an/the/this, Correctness
772
etc.)
320.
764
766 on the account of → Determiner use (a/an/the/this, Correctness
on account of etc.)
321.
773
752 , and Comma misuse within clauses Correctness
777
776 have a download button for the
evaluation forms, weighted mean
754
774 calculator, evaluation tools, the
summary of evaluation ratings of the
755
programs under the college where
the accreditor belongs and the
supporting documents.
775
327.
759
756 accreditation → certi cation Word choice Engagement
768
328. ". → ." Misuse of semicolons, quotation Correctness
marks, etc.
757
329.
769 form → format, structure, shape Word choice Engagement
777
776 submenu labeled as "Evaluation
Tools", then nd the tool for the
754
774 desired area by searching …
755
335. tools → devices Word choice Engagement
336.
775 To access these supporting Misplaced words or phrases Correctness
documents
339.
760 To upload Misplaced words or phrases Correctness
763
340. Ratings, Punctuation in Correctness
762 compound/complex sentences
342.
768 nally, Punctuation in Correctness
compound/complex sentences
757
343.
769 labeled → marked Word choice Engagement
758
761
770
345. to compute Incorrect verb forms Correctness
347.
771
751 a successful Determiner use (a/an/the/this, Correctness
etc.)
772
777
776 individual ratings of the ten areas
which are all must be in pdf le
754
774 format.
755
350. , and Comma misuse within clauses Correctness
351.
775 ". → ." Misuse of semicolons, quotation Correctness
marks, etc.
354.
760 ratings → rating Incorrect noun number Correctness
763
355. form → from Confused words Correctness
762
356. area → areas Incorrect noun number Correctness
357.
756
759 To ll this table Misplaced words or phrases Correctness
768
358. as Wrong or missing prepositions Correctness
757
359. all the ratings will be uploaded Passive voice misuse Clarity
769
360. After the accreditors uploaded all the Unclear sentences Clarity
ratings of the evaluations, the
information will be recorded and
stored in the database.
758
761
770
361. The evaluation ratings will be stored Passive voice misuse Clarity
767
362. stored → held Word choice Engagement
771
751
363. be stored Passive voice misuse Clarity
772
364.
764
766 stored → held Word choice Engagement
366. one to ten ratings will be stored Passive voice misuse Clarity
777
776
367. stored → held Word choice Engagement
754
774
368.
755 The users can view the list of Unclear sentences Clarity
evaluation ratings by clicking the
menu labeled as "Results and
Ratings" and choose among the
775
submenus available.
370.
765 placed Wordy sentences Clarity
753
371. are stored Passive voice misuse Clarity
760
372. which is Wordy sentences Clarity
763
373.
762 to → To Improper formatting Correctness
375.
768 user → users Incorrect noun number Correctness
757
376. information → data Word choice Engagement
769
382.
764
766 it → them Pronoun use Correctness
777
776 uses actors and use cases to model
the functionality of a system.
754
774
385.
755 refers → refer Faulty subject-verb agreement Correctness
765
389. useful for → helpful in, helpful for Word choice Engagement
753
390. a good → an excellent, a excellent Word choice Engagement
760
391.
763 could be supplemented Passive voice misuse Clarity
762
392. be written Passive voice misuse Clarity
397.
758
761
770 Required elds must be lled up Passive voice misuse Clarity
771
751
399. in → on Wrong or missing prepositions Correctness
772
400. The system Determiner use (a/an/the/this, Correctness
764
766
etc.)
777
776
403. the potential, or a potential Determiner use (a/an/the/this, Correctness
754
774 etc.)
755
404. same program → same program Improper formatting Correctness
408.
753 the Accreditation Determiner use (a/an/the/this, Correctness
etc.)
760
409.
763 The system Determiner use (a/an/the/this, Correctness
etc.)
762
756
759
411. QA Director: Clicks "Upload" button. Incomplete sentences Correctness
768
412. the potential, or a potential Determiner use (a/an/the/this, Correctness
757 etc.)
769
413. same program → same program Improper formatting Correctness
415.
758
761
770 the Weighted Determiner use (a/an/the/this, Correctness
etc.)
416.
767 The system Determiner use (a/an/the/this, Correctness
etc.)
771
751
417.
772 ". → ." Misuse of semicolons, quotation Correctness
marks, etc.
764
766
777
776
420. Required elds must be lled up Passive voice misuse Clarity
754
774
421.
755 There's → There Redundant words Correctness
426.
763
a le Determiner use (a/an/the/this, Correctness
etc.)
762
428.
756
759 There's → There Redundant words Correctness
768
429. in → on Wrong or missing prepositions Correctness
757
430. the Uploaded Determiner use (a/an/the/this, Correctness
769
etc.)
433.
767 a le Determiner use (a/an/the/this, Correctness
etc.)
771
751
435.
764
766 There's → There Redundant words Correctness
777
776
440.
775 a le Determiner use (a/an/the/this, Correctness
etc.)
765
442. the Accreditation Determiner use (a/an/the/this, Correctness
etc.)
753
443.
760 the download Determiner use (a/an/the/this, Correctness
etc.)
763
444.
762 in → on Wrong or missing prepositions Correctness
768
446. the download Determiner use (a/an/the/this, Correctness
etc.)
757
447.
769 Accreditation. Closing punctuation Correctness
777
776
454. , and Comma misuse within clauses Correctness
754
774
455. the area Determiner use (a/an/the/this, Correctness
755
etc.)
760
459. ". → ." Misuse of semicolons, quotation Correctness
763 marks, etc.
460.
762 , and Comma misuse within clauses Correctness
466.
767 the "Summary Determiner use (a/an/the/this, Correctness
etc.)
771
751
468.
764
766 Ratings → Rating Incorrect noun number Correctness
777
776 etc.)
754
774
471. uploaded → upload Modal verbs Correctness
755
473.
775 the "Area Determiner use (a/an/the/this, Correctness
etc.)
765
475. ". → ." Misuse of semicolons, quotation Correctness
753 marks, etc.
476.
760 ". → ." Misuse of semicolons, quotation Correctness
marks, etc.
763
477.
762 a graphical Determiner use (a/an/the/this, Correctness
etc.)
478.
756
759 a speci c Determiner use (a/an/the/this, Correctness
etc.)
768
769
480. Director: Misuse of semicolons, quotation Correctness
marks, etc.
483.
771
751 ". → ." Misuse of semicolons, quotation Correctness
marks, etc.
772
486.
777
776 the "Reports" Determiner use (a/an/the/this, Correctness
etc.)
754
774
487.
755 Shows a bar graph with ltered Incomplete sentences Correctness
programs with respective weighted
means.
775
488. ". → ." Misuse of semicolons, quotation Correctness
marks, etc.
753
490. a graphical Determiner use (a/an/the/this, Correctness
etc.)
760
491.
763 Director: Misuse of semicolons, quotation Correctness
marks, etc.
762
493.
768 ". → ." Misuse of semicolons, quotation Correctness
marks, etc.
757
494. a college Determiner use (a/an/the/this, Correctness
769
etc.)
777
776 etc.)
754
774
501. the system Determiner use (a/an/the/this, Correctness
755 etc.)
504.
765 ". → ." Misuse of semicolons, quotation Correctness
marks, etc.
753
505.
760 ". → ." Misuse of semicolons, quotation Correctness
marks, etc.
763
506.
762 Director: Misuse of semicolons, quotation Correctness
marks, etc.
777
776 etc.)
754
774
516. The system Determiner use (a/an/the/this, Correctness
755 etc.)
519.
765 ". → ." Misuse of semicolons, quotation Correctness
marks, etc.
753
520.
760 ". → ." Misuse of semicolons, quotation Correctness
marks, etc.
763
521.
762 required → needed, necessary Word choice Engagement
527.
767 areano → area no Misspelled words Correctness
771
751
528. key id → key-id Misspelled words Correctness
772
529.
764
766
areano → area no Misspelled words Correctness
532.
777
776 key id → key-id Misspelled words Correctness
754
774
533. evaname Unknown words Correctness
755
535.
775 toolname → tool name Misspelled words Correctness
538.
753 Ratings → Rating Incorrect noun number Correctness
760
539. evaname Unknown words Correctness
763
544.
769 key id → key-id Misspelled words Correctness
550.
764
766 evadate → evade Misspelled words Correctness
553.
777
776 key id → key-id Misspelled words Correctness
754
774
554. module → modules Incorrect noun number Correctness
755
556.
775 certain → particular, speci c Word choice Engagement
558.
765
, and Comma misuse within clauses Correctness
559.
753 are based Passive voice misuse Clarity
760
560. from → on Wrong or missing prepositions Correctness
763
561.
762
log in → log-in Misspelled words Correctness
562. The log in feature of the system Passive voice misuse Clarity
should not be placed
756
759
563.
768 in → on Wrong or missing prepositions Correctness
757
564. it must Incomplete sentences Correctness
769
569.
771
751 ever Wordy sentences Clarity
772
570. certain → speci c, particular Word choice Engagement
764
766
572.
773
752 its → their Pronoun use Correctness
777
776 users to delete les together with its
information if these are mistakenly
754
774 uploaded and not needed anymore.
755
574. account → accounts Incorrect noun number Correctness
575.
775 which are → that are Pronoun use Correctness
580.
762 evaluation → review, assessment Word choice Engagement
587.
767 ", → ," Misuse of semicolons, quotation Correctness
marks, etc.
771
751
588.
772 of → to Wrong or missing prepositions Correctness
764
766
589. , which Punctuation in Correctness
compound/complex sentences
590.
773
752 Non-functional requirements de ne Unclear sentences Clarity
how a system is supposed to be and
in the form of "the system should be",
777
776 in contrast of the functional
requirements which is in the form of
754
774 "the system should do".
755
591. ". → ." Misuse of semicolons, quotation Correctness
marks, etc.
775
592. the operating, or an operating Determiner use (a/an/the/this, Correctness
etc.)
756
759
597. is ful lled Passive voice misuse Clarity
768
598. , and Comma misuse within clauses Correctness
757
599.
769 an expected → Word choice Engagement
a common, a standard, a typical,
a usual
603.
772 properly → correctly Word choice Engagement
764
766
604. It has components that de ne input, Unclear sentences Clarity
action and an expected response, in
order to decide if a feature of an
773
752 application is working properly.
777
776
606.
754
774
system → method, approach Word choice Engagement
607.
755 in order to → to Wordy sentences Clarity
611.
753 selection → section Word choice Engagement
760
612. end users → end-users Misspelled words Correctness
763
613. This Intricate text Clarity
762
758
761
770
619. functionable → functional Misspelled words Correctness
621.
771
751 a set, or the set Determiner use (a/an/the/this, Correctness
etc.)
772
622.
764
766
been compiled Passive voice misuse Clarity
777
776 been compiled to become a computer
program.
754
774
624.
755 a software Determiner use (a/an/the/this, Correctness
etc.)
625.
775 , and Comma misuse within clauses Correctness
763
629. components → Word choice Engagement
762 details, features, members
757
632. The hardware components however Unclear sentences Clarity
769 refer to the actual components of the
computer such as the monitor,
keyboard, mouse and the system
unit.
633.
758
761
770 makes → make Faulty subject-verb agreement Correctness
777
776
639. properly → correctly, appropriately Word choice Engagement
754
774
640. system Wordy sentences Clarity
755
775
642. properly → correctly Word choice Engagement
644.
765 , which Punctuation in Correctness
compound/complex sentences
753
645.
760
can be accessed Passive voice misuse Clarity
646.
763 This Intricate text Clarity
762
647. This includes the calculation of the Unclear sentences Clarity
expected cost that the developed
system needs as well as the bene ts
756
759 that it gives.
768
648. will be used Passive voice misuse Clarity
757
649.
769
assist → assists Faulty subject-verb agreement Correctness
651.
758
761
770 graphical → visual Word choice Engagement
773
752
656. , and Comma misuse within clauses Correctness
657.
777
776 report → information Word choice Engagement
754
774
658. It covers areas such as graph report Unclear sentences Clarity
755 showing the ongoing level of the
programs, graph report showing the
summary of weighted means of all
programs or programs under the
775
selected college and the graphical
report showing programs evaluated
based on the selected year with their
respective weighted mea…
765
659. user-friendliness Misspelled words Correctness
753
660. was designed Passive voice misuse Clarity
760
661.
763 a clear Determiner use (a/an/the/this, Correctness
etc.)
762
668.
767 have → has Faulty subject-verb agreement Correctness
771
751
669. been accomplished Passive voice misuse Clarity
772
670.
764
766
The survey was done Passive voice misuse Clarity
673.
777
776 The researchers visited the end Unclear sentences Clarity
users' of ces to present the system
754
774 and demonstrate modules in detail
like the uploading of documents,
755
downloading of evaluation forms and
tools, accreditation processes and
submission of accreditation ratings.
775
760
677. end users → end-users Misspelled words Correctness
763
678. This indicates that the system has Unclear sentences Clarity
762
high usability rating indicating the
acceptability of the system to the
end users.
756
759
679. am able to → can Wordy sentences Clarity
768
680.
757 am able to → can Wordy sentences Clarity
769
681. to complete my work using this Inappropriate colloquialisms Delivery
system ef ciently
684.
767 , and Comma misuse within clauses Correctness
771
751
685. , and Comma misuse within clauses Correctness
772
686. the consistency Determiner use (a/an/the/this, Correctness
764
766 etc.)
687. within the site → within site Determiner use (a/an/the/this, Correctness
773
752 etc.)
777
776
689.
754
774
clearly Wordy sentences Clarity
690.
755 is clearly identi ed Passive voice misuse Clarity
695.
760
is provided Passive voice misuse Clarity
696.
763 are given Passive voice misuse Clarity
762
697. is not included Passive voice misuse Clarity
698.
756
759
the text Determiner use (a/an/the/this, Correctness
etc.)
768
699. etc Inappropriate colloquialisms Delivery
757
700.
769 is provided Passive voice misuse Clarity
758
761
770
702. is organized Passive voice misuse Clarity
704.
771
751 is used Passive voice misuse Clarity
772
705. This Intricate text Clarity
764
766
706. end users → end-users Misspelled words Correctness
707.
773
752 , AND Comma misuse within clauses Correctness
777
776
709. to → in Wrong or missing prepositions Correctness
754
774
710.
755 , and Comma misuse within clauses Correctness
714.
756
759 , as Punctuation in Correctness
compound/complex sentences
768
718.
772
, and Punctuation in Correctness
compound/complex sentences
764
766
777
776
721. is interpreted Passive voice misuse Clarity
754
774
722.
755 ". → ." Misuse of semicolons, quotation Correctness
marks, etc.
723.
775 the web Determiner use (a/an/the/this, Correctness
etc.)
726.
760 This Intricate text Clarity
763
727. to → in Wrong or missing prepositions Correctness
762
728. can be resolved Passive voice misuse Clarity
729.
756
759 Based on the ndings of the study, Unclear sentences Clarity
the developers had concluded that
768 the present system of internal
accreditation of BISU – Bilar adopts
757 the manual processes that resulted
769
to related problems which can be
resolved through computerization.
733.
772
With the functional assessment of Unclear sentences Clarity
the AACCUP Online Centralized
764
766 Accreditation System of Bohol Island
State University – Bilar Campus, the
capability and features of the system
had met the expectations of the
773
752 users to improve the internal
evaluation processes.
734.
777
776 is highly recommended Passive voice misuse Clarity
754
774
735. the developed system should be Passive voice misuse Clarity
755 implemented
739.
753 , especially Punctuation in Correctness
compound/complex sentences
760
740.
763 Purchase a domain and web hosting Unclear sentences Clarity
to increase the dynamic features
762 that may incorporate in the system
especially in the amount of data
storage.
756
759
741. Training and orientation seminars Passive voice misuse Clarity
768 must be conducted
757
742. end users → end-users Misspelled words Correctness
769
743. be oriented Passive voice misuse Clarity
746.
771
be reported Passive voice misuse Clarity
751
747.
772 so immediate Incomplete sentences Correctness
764
766
748. an immediate Determiner use (a/an/the/this, Correctness
etc.)
773
752
749. so immediate solution will be applied Passive voice misuse Clarity
750.
777
776 applied. Closing punctuation Correctness
754
774
751. The Bohol Island State University Bohol Island State University | Originality
755 (BISU), formerly the Central Visayas Entranceuniversity
State College of Agriculture, Forestry https://www.entranceuniversity.co
and Technology (CVSCAFT), is a m/city/bohol-island-state-
public institution of higher learning in university/
775
Bohol, Philippines.
752. The institution operates campuses Bohol Island State University - Originality
spread throughout the province, with Wikipedia
the main campus in Tagbilaran City, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boh
765
Bohol. ol_Island_State_University
753
753. an institution at the tertiary level About UAC | University Originality
760 evaluates its educational activities Accreditation Center
https://www.usep.edu.ph/uac/abo
763
ut-uac/
762
754. Science and technology are essential Science and Technology SECTION Originality
for national development and 10 Science and technology ...
progress. The State shall give priority https://www.coursehero.com/ le/
756
759
to research and development, p29me8sm/Science-and-
768
invention, innovation, and their Technology-SECTION-10-Science-
utilization; and to science and and-technology-are-essential-
757
technology education, training, and for/
services. It shall support indigenous,
769 appropriate, and self-re…
757.
764
766 Speci cally, it seeks to answer the INNOVATION AND BUSINESS Originality
following questions: What PERFORMANCE: A LITERATURE
REVIEW
http://ecsocman.hse.ru/data/696/
773
752
521/1221/litreview_innov1.pdf
758.
777
776 A web hosting service is a type of What is domain and web hosting - Originality
internet hosting that allows Yashis Digital Services
754
774 individuals and organizations to https://www.yashis.in/what-is-
make their websites accessible via domain-and-web-hosting/
755
the World Wide Web. Web
760. notable for playing a key role in the Rob Hartill - Wikipedia Originality
765
initial growth of the World Wide Web. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rob
753
_Hartill
761.
760 Code is a code editor rede ned and Visual Studio Code < The Software Originality
optimized for building and debugging Zone
763
modern web and cloud applications. https://thesoftwarezone.com/visu
762
al-studio-code/
763.
768 The le must be in pdf le format Applying for Admission to the Originality
Master’s Program ...
757 https://econ.wisc.edu/masters/ad
mission/
769
764. These buttons are located at the top Basic Components Of Windows - Originality
right When Parents Text
https://www.whenparentstext.co
m/tips/basic-components-of-
758
761
770
windows/
765. uses actors and use cases to model UML Diagrams for Course Originality
767
the functionality of a system. Management System
https://www.edrawsoft.com/uml-
771
751
diagrams-for-course-
772 management-system.html
764
766
766. All the logical and physical design Oracle Database Administrator Originality
choices and Resume Samples | Velvet Jobs
https://www.velvetjobs.com/resu
773
752 me/oracle-database-
administrator-resume-sample
767.
777
776 Non-functional requirements de ne Non-functional requirement - Originality
how a system is supposed to be Wikipedia
754
774 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non
-functional_requirement
755
768. Overall, I am satis ed with how easy PSSUQ (Post-Study System Originality
it is to use this system. It was simple Usability Questionnaire) - UIUX
775
to use this system. I Trend
https://uiuxtrend.com/pssuq-
post-study-system-usability-
questionnaire/
765
769. can effectively complete my work Trustiness in costumer/user chat Originality
753
using this system. I am able to services: the importance ...
complete my work quickly using this https://www.upf.edu/hipertextnet
760 system. I am able to ef ciently /en/numero-
complete my work using this system. 11/trustiness_user_chat.html
763
770.
762
comfortable using this system. It was PSSUQ (Post-Study System Originality
easy to learn to use this system. I Usability Questionnaire) - UIUX
believe I Trend
https://uiuxtrend.com/pssuq-
756
759 post-study-system-usability-
questionnaire/
768
771.
757
The system gives error messages Trustiness in costumer/user chat Originality
that clearly tell me how to x services: the importance ...
769 problems. Whenever I make a https://www.upf.edu/hipertextnet
mistake using the system, I /en/numero-
11/trustiness_user_chat.html
772. recover easily and quickly. The PSSUQ (Post-Study System Originality
758
761
770 information (such as online help, on- Usability Questionnaire) - UIUX
screen messages, and other Trend
documentation) provided with this https://uiuxtrend.com/pssuq-
767
system post-study-system-usability-
questionnaire/
771
751
773. It is easy to nd the information I Questionnaire for User Interface Originality
772
needed. The information provided for Satisfaction (QUIS)
764
766
the system is easy to understand. http://www.di-
srv.unisa.it/~delmal/research/usa
bility/VisualHarmony/UsabilityStu
dy/QUIS_CSQU.pdf
773
752
777
776 organization of information on the Trend
system screens https://uiuxtrend.com/pssuq-
754
774 post-study-system-usability-
questionnaire/
755
775. using the interface of this system. PSSUQ (Post-Study System Originality
This system has all the functions and Usability Questionnaire) - UIUX
775
capabilities I expect it to have. Trend
Overall, I am satis ed with this https://uiuxtrend.com/pssuq-
system. post-study-system-usability-
questionnaire/
765
776. After a thorough study of the present Opening remarks by Chairman of Originality
753
system, Independent Review ...
https://www.info.gov.hk/gia/gener
760 al/201205/31/P201205310283.ht
m
763
777.
762
Based on the ndings of the study, Buildings | Free Full-Text | Originality
the Development of Side Mold ...
https://www.mdpi.com/2075-
5309/11/4/175
756
759
768
757
769
758
761
770
767
771
751
772
764
766
773
752