Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Pages From PSHA-of-Pakistan-8

    Uploaded by

    AhMeD KhEdR
    8 views1 page
    The document compares different studies that estimated ground motion for Pakistan earthquakes. It shows that earlier studies like GSHAP (1999) and PMD and NORSAR (2007) used only single ground motion prediction equations (GMPEs) without addressing uncertainty. Later studies like NESPAK (2007) and Zaman et al. (2012) used multiple GMPEs for different earthquake source types and environments. The current study, like EMME (2014), also used multiple GMPEs for crustal, intermediate and deep earthquakes, as well as for subduction zones, to better address epistemic uncertainty in ground motion estimates.

    Original Description:

    Original Title

    Pages from PSHA-of-Pakistan-8

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document compares different studies that estimated ground motion for Pakistan earthquakes. It shows that earlier studies like GSHAP (1999) and PMD and NORSAR (2007) used only single ground motion prediction equations (GMPEs) without addressing uncertainty. Later studies like NESPAK (2007) and Zaman et al. (2012) used multiple GMPEs for different earthquake source types and environments. The current study, like EMME (2014), also used multiple GMPEs for crustal, intermediate and deep earthquakes, as well as for subduction zones, to better address epistemic uncertainty in ground motion estimates.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    8 views1 page

    Pages From PSHA-of-Pakistan-8

    Uploaded by

    AhMeD KhEdR
    The document compares different studies that estimated ground motion for Pakistan earthquakes. It shows that earlier studies like GSHAP (1999) and PMD and NORSAR (2007) used only single ground motion prediction equations (GMPEs) without addressing uncertainty. Later studies like NESPAK (2007) and Zaman et al. (2012) used multiple GMPEs for different earthquake source types and environments. The current study, like EMME (2014), also used multiple GMPEs for crustal, intermediate and deep earthquakes, as well as for subduction zones, to better address epistemic uncertainty in ground motion estimates.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    Table 2  (continued)

    Study GSHAP (Zhang et al. PMD and NORSAR NESPAK (2007) Zaman et al. (2012) EMME (2014) Current study
    1999) (2007)

    13
    GMPEs Only single GMPE of GMPE of (Ambraseys GMPE of (Boore et al. Multiple GMPEs for Multiple GMPEs for Multiple GMPEs for
    (Huo and Hu 1992) et al. 2005) was used 1997) was used. different earthquake different earthquake different earthquake
    was used for ground Multiple GMPEs were Multiple GMPEs environments were environments were environments were
    motion estimation not used to deal were not used to used used used
    No multiple GMPEs with the epistemic deal with the epis- For crustal faults, very Active shallow crustal For crustal faults, very
    were used to deal uncertainty temic uncertainty shallow and shallow: region: AK14(0.35), shallow and shallow:
    with the epistemic three NGA west 1 CY08(0.35), three NGA west 2
    uncertainty GMPEs CB08(0.33), AC10(0.2), Z06(0.1) GMPEs CB14(0.33),
    BA08(0.33), Stable shallow crustal BA11(0.33),
    CY08(0.33) Inter- region: AB06(0.4), CY14(0.33)
    mediate: Y97(0.5), C03(0.25), Intermediate: Y97(0.5),
    AB03(0.5) T97(0.35) AB03(0.5)
    Deep: Y97(1.0) Deep Seismicity: Deep: Y97(1.0)
    Subduction zone: Y97(0.5), Subduction zone:
    Y97(0.25), LL08(0.5) Y97(0.25),
    AB03(0.25), Subduction zone: AB03(0.25), Z06(0.5)
    Z06(0.5) Z06(0.4),
    Y97(0.2),
    AB03(0.2),
    LL08(0.2)
    Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering

    You might also like